Turns the Armis is running a scam, and not the charity (no charity license!) he claims. But he wants to reassure you that all the public identities of his board of directors (no corporation license!) will be disclosed to the stakeholders (no corporation license!) once he collects a large sum of non-reversible currency.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1002378.msg11371652#msg11371652Do all his sponsors know he is running a scam? Esp Hobonickels - I know thy are pro-charity and anti-greed.Vod carried that same falsehood to a PICISI sponsor: ([WAC] Official WorldAidCoin Thread)
Turns out Armis is running a scam, and not the charity (no charity license!) he claims. But he wants to reassure you that all the public identities of his board of directors (no corporation license!) will be disclosed to the stakeholders (no corporation license!) once he collects a large sum of non-reversible currency.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1002378.msg11371652#msg11371652Do all his sponsors know he is running a scam? Esp Hobonickels - I know thy are pro-charity and anti-greed.Here was the PICISI sponsor's response:
I find that very hard to believe in Armis. Also its not like he is asking a lot of donations. It would not make sense in anyway possible to scam people. He has my trust anyway
Here was my direct response:
I find that very hard to believe in Armis. Also its not like he is asking a lot of donations. It would not make sense in anyway possible to scam people. He has my trust anyway
I appreciate your support. Vod's irresponsible smear campaign is a pit of negativity.
It has become obvious to me that Vod didn't read much about PICISI before rushing to judgement. Ask him to tell you what PICISI is, he could not tell you because he didn't read about it and refuses to believe what he is told by the creator of PICISI.
He claims it's a scam so I said if you actually believe that then bet your membership in bitcointalk.org, once I prove that it is not a scam Vod membership must resign.
He refused to address that. That's proof that he is not just spreading fear but that he doesn't stand behind his words, position, and feedback.
How unfair is it to have a "trust system" in which someone could make a false accusation that causes damage to ones character but suffer no penalty when proven wrong?
I know the site isn't a free country, however I also know that 'guilty until proven innocent' is a bad policy, but worse is the fact that no penalty is suffered by those who seek to used the trust system as an extortion mechanism.
Vod mentioned "Charity" "license" "corporation" "board of directors" "stakeholders" and "collection of large sums of ... currency" In short, Vod jumped to the wrong conclusion over and over again because he didn't want to read.
Here is a more comprehensive view: Vod is assuming facts not in evidence, and more importantly if he or anyone simply look at the fact (or the evidence) everyone should see the truth. Here are the facts PICISI is a business plan taking shape, I am the designer of the plan. A critical part of that plan is formation of the org, creation of the site, and creation of currency.
Vod didn't read the plan, didn't read the articles about the plan, nor did he read the threads about the plan, because had he done any or all of them he would have found that there was never any plan for PICISI to be a charity, that it was always the plan for PICISI to be a business, and the plan was for the business to help give CC more exposure in real world applications.
The evidence of those facts is more than obvious, the site prerequisites imply that no site presently exists, the site prerequisites also imply that once those goals are met that something else will occur, when you look at the individual prerequisites in relation to all of them the viewer should reasonable conclude that soon after all goals are achieved the basic tools will be in place to create the business.
You don't need a license to market a plan, you don't need a license to raise money to form a org or any type, you don't need a license put the pieces together for the creation of that business.
Vod mentioned a 'corporation' and 'board of directors' where did he get that from? Who called PICISI a corporation? Who said PICISI has a board of directors? No one that I see, Vod is the only person putting that out there to my knowledge. Given that Vod used the word "stakeholders" like this: "stakeholders (no corporation license!)" I assume Vod has confused the words "stakeholders" with the word "stockholders". Again he allowed his preconceived notions to prejudice his judgement. It's important to note that I corrected that error of his earlier however he likely didn't read it or believe it.
and lastly,
Vod mentioned 'collection of large sums of money', he really needs to explain that because PICISI does plan on making large sums of money, over and over again, and I would not be foolish to run away from that.
Vod clearly failed to get adequately informed about PICISI before he came to his conclusions, famto get familiar with the subject before makeing ado his homework
I'm looking for people to help me manage PICISI it requires that interested parties read all of the articles presently available about PICISI, and have a solid understanding about PICISI in addition to being suitable for the position sought. So that when more FUD arrives at PICISI's doorstep more of us are ready to defend her.
