Bitcoin Forum
December 05, 2022, 07:07:45 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 23.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 [609] 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 ... 1348 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It  (Read 3914566 times)
SaintFlow
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


The first is by definition not flawed.


View Profile
August 29, 2013, 07:18:25 PM
 #12161

Friedcat is the only one who puts a little trust in bitcoin business. All other players just fucked up

only one? all other fucked?
why so no bitcoin transactions with you?

don't let me make you question your assumptions
1670267265
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1670267265

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1670267265
Reply with quote  #2

1670267265
Report to moderator
1670267265
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1670267265

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1670267265
Reply with quote  #2

1670267265
Report to moderator
1670267265
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1670267265

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1670267265
Reply with quote  #2

1670267265
Report to moderator
Whoever mines the block which ends up containing your transaction will get its fee.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1670267265
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1670267265

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1670267265
Reply with quote  #2

1670267265
Report to moderator
1670267265
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1670267265

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1670267265
Reply with quote  #2

1670267265
Report to moderator
1670267265
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1670267265

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1670267265
Reply with quote  #2

1670267265
Report to moderator
donut
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 246
Merit: 252


View Profile
August 29, 2013, 07:41:34 PM
 #12162

Friedcat is the only one who puts a little trust in bitcoin business. All other players just fucked up

only one? all other fucked?
why so no bitcoin transactions with you?

Are you thick? He's talking about mining businesses.
conv3rsion
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 310
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 29, 2013, 07:54:50 PM
 #12163

I'm extremely happy that Friedcat returned that transaction fee mistake.

Integrity is worth a lot more than 200 coins (no matter what BTC ends up being worth).
TheSwede75
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 29, 2013, 09:04:26 PM
 #12164

I'm extremely happy that Friedcat returned that transaction fee mistake.

Integrity is worth a lot more than 200 coins (no matter what BTC ends up being worth).

Looking forward to being able to call Friedcat "The man with the million dollar integrity" Smiley
donut
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 246
Merit: 252


View Profile
August 29, 2013, 09:08:53 PM
 #12165

Technically he didn't have to refund such a mistake. I am 0.0005 BTC poorer per share I own because of his damn integrity!
vortex1878
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 492
Merit: 500


View Profile
August 29, 2013, 09:11:46 PM
 #12166

Technically he didn't have to refund such a mistake. I am 0.0005 BTC poorer per share I own because of his damn integrity!

Wow. Congratulations.
SebastianJu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 1076


Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile


View Profile WWW
August 29, 2013, 09:22:36 PM
 #12167

Technically he didn't have to refund such a mistake. I am 0.0005 BTC poorer per share I own because of his damn integrity!

Looks like integrity is worth practically nothing to you then. Good to know. I hope i remember before doing business with you.

Please ALWAYS contact me through bitcointalk pm before sending someone coins.
SOFORTGELD
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 29, 2013, 09:23:48 PM
 #12168

Technically he didn't have to refund such a mistake. I am 0.0005 BTC poorer per share I own because of his damn integrity!

multiply  200 shares (average shareholder) = 10 dollar  lost!

Anyways: I would have refunded as well.
SebastianJu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 1076


Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile


View Profile WWW
August 29, 2013, 09:24:29 PM
 #12169

I don't pay for promises. I pay for results and delivery.

Others promise. And promise. And promise.

Friedcat delivers.

Friedcat once was a promiser only too. And i believed him luckily.

There are significantly more promisers than miss their mark compared to ones that hit, like FC.  And even FC has stumbled at times.

When even FC has a hard time, it makes me wonder how in the world some of these other jokers will meet even half of their wild claims.

When i invest in a couple of them and only one of them is a winner similar to Asicminer while all others fail... i still won more than enough...

Please ALWAYS contact me through bitcointalk pm before sending someone coins.
herzmeister
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1007



View Profile WWW
August 29, 2013, 09:53:38 PM
 #12170

About the 200 bitcoin - I wonder when the press picks up on it.

The value Mr. Cat created for the public perception of bitcoin is bigger than 200 coins.


Exactly, I already said elsewhere:

Another remarkable aspect to this story is that despite all the talk about (pseudo-) anonymity in Bitcoin, how transparent it actually is when things are important. The media ought to pick up on this.

https://localbitcoins.com/?ch=80k | BTC: 1LJvmd1iLi199eY7EVKtNQRW3LqZi8ZmmB
stripykitteh
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!


View Profile
August 29, 2013, 09:57:02 PM
 #12171

About the 200 bitcoin - I wonder when the press picks up on it.

The value Mr. Cat created for the public perception of bitcoin is bigger than 200 coins.


Exactly, I already said elsewhere:

Another remarkable aspect to this story is that despite all the talk about (pseudo-) anonymity in Bitcoin, how transparent it actually is when things are important. The media ought to pick up on this.

Yes, if you are a big enough player, bitcoin really only offers pseudonymity, not anonymity.

Bravo, friedcat. One only has to consider for a moment what a lot of other bitcoin luminaries would do with such a windfall to realize that friedcat is an unusual beast.

 
                                . ██████████.
                              .████████████████.
                           .██████████████████████.
                        -█████████████████████████████
                     .██████████████████████████████████.
                  -█████████████████████████████████████████
               -███████████████████████████████████████████████
           .-█████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
        .████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
       .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       ..████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████..
       .   .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       .      .████████████████████████████████████████████████.

       .       .██████████████████████████████████████████████
       .    ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████
       .█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
        .███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
           .█████████████████████████████████████████████████████
              .████████████████████████████████████████████████
                   ████████████████████████████████████████
                      ██████████████████████████████████
                          ██████████████████████████
                             ████████████████████
                               ████████████████
                                   █████████
.CryptoTalk.org.|.MAKE POSTS AND EARN BTC!.🏆
donut
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 246
Merit: 252


View Profile
August 29, 2013, 10:04:44 PM
 #12172

Technically he didn't have to refund such a mistake. I am 0.0005 BTC poorer per share I own because of his damn integrity!

Looks like integrity is worth practically nothing to you then. Good to know. I hope i remember before doing business with you.

You guys just don't understand sarcasm when you see it, do you?
Let me chew it for you: it's a really really tiny sum in the grand scheme of things, and I posted the exact sum to illustrate the fact.

I am sure those 200 BTC will go a long way in terms of trusting customers.
SebastianJu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 1076


Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile


View Profile WWW
August 29, 2013, 10:38:19 PM
 #12173

Technically he didn't have to refund such a mistake. I am 0.0005 BTC poorer per share I own because of his damn integrity!

Looks like integrity is worth practically nothing to you then. Good to know. I hope i remember before doing business with you.

You guys just don't understand sarcasm when you see it, do you?
Let me chew it for you: it's a really really tiny sum in the grand scheme of things, and I posted the exact sum to illustrate the fact.

I am sure those 200 BTC will go a long way in terms of trusting customers.

Ah ok... you sounded so serious that i really thought you care about that sum... Smiley

Anyway... even if it would be a sum for a number of shares owned... its a way way bigger sum for someone who lost it. And we dont even know if its a normal bitcoiner that has more of it or only a developer that would have to work years to pay it back... only saying...

Please ALWAYS contact me through bitcointalk pm before sending someone coins.
AngelSky
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 537



View Profile
August 29, 2013, 11:00:09 PM
 #12174

What are you talking about guys ? Integrity ? Am I dreaming ?
TsuyokuNaritai
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 30, 2013, 12:58:45 AM
 #12175

I know the 6hr average doesn't mean squat, but...

http://www.dpcapital.net/blockchain/?hours=1,2,3,4,5,6,7
http://blockchain.info/blocks/ASICMiner

no blocks AT ALL for the last six hours!?! Shocked

DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1052


Gerald Davis


View Profile
August 30, 2013, 01:13:04 AM
Last edit: August 30, 2013, 01:37:10 AM by DeathAndTaxes
 #12176

I know the 6hr average doesn't mean squat, but...

http://www.dpcapital.net/blockchain/?hours=1,2,3,4,5,6,7
http://blockchain.info/blocks/ASICMiner

no blocks AT ALL for the last six hours!?! Shocked

There is a ~3% chance of 0 blocks vs 3.6 blocks expected in 6 hours is due to luck.
There is a ~1% chance of 0 blocks vs 4.8 blocks expected in 8 hours is due to luck.
There is a ~0.2% chance of 0 blocks vs 6.0 blocks expected in 10 hours is due to luck.

Assumes AM is operating at 10% of network hashrate (well technically 10% of the hashrate required to sustain the current difficulty), if AM is lower then the chances would be higher.
CMMPro
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 30, 2013, 01:35:21 AM
 #12177

Interesting that Slush's pool has had a run of shit luck too the past day or so.

Statistically it's bound to happen.
Rebelution
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10



View Profile
August 30, 2013, 02:01:06 AM
 #12178

I know the 6hr average doesn't mean squat, but...

http://www.dpcapital.net/blockchain/?hours=1,2,3,4,5,6,7
http://blockchain.info/blocks/ASICMiner

no blocks AT ALL for the last six hours!?! Shocked

There is a ~3% chance of 0 blocks vs 3.6 blocks expected in 6 hours is due to luck.
There is a ~1% chance of 0 blocks vs 4.8 blocks expected in 8 hours is due to luck.
There is a ~0.2% chance of 0 blocks vs 6.0 blocks expected in 10 hours is due to luck.

Assumes AM is operating at 10% of network hashrate (well technically 10% of the hashrate required to sustain the current difficulty), if AM is lower then the chances would be higher.


Calculations to support these probabilities?  They do not seem accurate to me.

Also there are several errors in your post.  All results are "due to luck" whether they are much lower than the expected value, exactly the expected value or much greater than the expected value.  The word "chances" should be "probabilities."  And it doesn't make any sense to say "~3% chance of 0 blocks vs 3.6 blocks."  I think you mean to say "~3% chance of 0 blocks when the expected number of blocks is 3.6."

Don't mean to be hard on you or anything. It's just that you write that as if you know what you talking about, but you clearly do not.  So I don't want other readers to be misled by your post if it is completely inaccurate.
dhenson
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 30, 2013, 02:05:14 AM
 #12179

I know the 6hr average doesn't mean squat, but...

http://www.dpcapital.net/blockchain/?hours=1,2,3,4,5,6,7
http://blockchain.info/blocks/ASICMiner

no blocks AT ALL for the last six hours!?! Shocked

There is a ~3% chance of 0 blocks vs 3.6 blocks expected in 6 hours is due to luck.
There is a ~1% chance of 0 blocks vs 4.8 blocks expected in 8 hours is due to luck.
There is a ~0.2% chance of 0 blocks vs 6.0 blocks expected in 10 hours is due to luck.

Assumes AM is operating at 10% of network hashrate (well technically 10% of the hashrate required to sustain the current difficulty), if AM is lower then the chances would be higher.


Calculations to support these probabilities?  They do not seem accurate to me.

Also there are several errors in your post.  All results are "due to luck" whether they are much lower than the expected value, exactly the expected value or much greater than the expected value.  The word "chances" should be "probabilities."  And it doesn't make any sense to say "~3% chance of 0 blocks vs 3.6 blocks."  I think you mean to say "~3% chance of 0 blocks when the expected number of blocks is 3.6."

Don't mean to be hard on you or anything. It's just that you write that as if you know what you talking about, but you clearly do not.  So I don't want other readers to be misled by your post if it is completely inaccurate.

This is going to be good...

dree12
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1073



View Profile
August 30, 2013, 03:33:40 AM
 #12180

I know the 6hr average doesn't mean squat, but...

http://www.dpcapital.net/blockchain/?hours=1,2,3,4,5,6,7
http://blockchain.info/blocks/ASICMiner

no blocks AT ALL for the last six hours!?! Shocked

There is a ~3% chance of 0 blocks vs 3.6 blocks expected in 6 hours is due to luck.
There is a ~1% chance of 0 blocks vs 4.8 blocks expected in 8 hours is due to luck.
There is a ~0.2% chance of 0 blocks vs 6.0 blocks expected in 10 hours is due to luck.

Assumes AM is operating at 10% of network hashrate (well technically 10% of the hashrate required to sustain the current difficulty), if AM is lower then the chances would be higher.


Calculations to support these probabilities?  They do not seem accurate to me.

Also there are several errors in your post.  All results are "due to luck" whether they are much lower than the expected value, exactly the expected value or much greater than the expected value.  The word "chances" should be "probabilities."  And it doesn't make any sense to say "~3% chance of 0 blocks vs 3.6 blocks."  I think you mean to say "~3% chance of 0 blocks when the expected number of blocks is 3.6."

Don't mean to be hard on you or anything. It's just that you write that as if you know what you talking about, but you clearly do not.  So I don't want other readers to be misled by your post if it is completely inaccurate.

Do you understand what a distribution is?
Pages: « 1 ... 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 [609] 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 ... 1348 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!