Puppet
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1040
|
 |
November 29, 2014, 02:47:34 PM |
|
Same things were said when the asicminers old USB miners were being sold. And it was probably true. Didn't stop them from selling like crazy.
By the time gen 4 USB sticks could reasonably be expected to ship, Id WAG difficulty to be above 80B. 2.5W/0.3J/GH= ~8GH wich would yield 0.0000501 BTC per day. Last summer, a USB block erupter mined about two orders of magnitude more. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, which will follow the rules of the network no matter what miners do. Even if every miner decided to create 1000 bitcoins per block, full nodes would stick to the rules and reject those blocks.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mabsark
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
|
|
November 30, 2014, 06:11:34 AM |
|
Well shit, AMHash is cheaper per GHs over at Hashie, and you get 10 GHs free to sign-up  Of course it is. Unlike AMHash, Hashie is actually trying to sell AMHash contracts and their sales person isn't completely incompetent. |
|
|
|
|
|
jjdub7
|
|
November 30, 2014, 07:51:38 AM |
|
That Laxo Trade spammer is sending 1000 satoshis all the time, all over the place, and none of their tx failed. Some fountains send even lesser amounts.
I don't think that threshold thing happened here - more likely not all shares are connected to the right addresses yet. That's why this div was - to clear out the shareholding status. So, check your address, and if the div is not there, clear that out with FC.
Laxo is sending 10000 Satoshis as far as I know. What you remember is maybe from before the introduction of the dust threshold in 0.8.2? Faucets and fountains were mostly killed by this, see for example http://bitcoin.lift-institute.com/killing-the-dust/0.00001000 btc, september 2014, long after v0.8.2 many outputs like this, put in a single tx - same way AM sends out divs. Interesting. I have no idea how they are able to do that - they shouldn't be. Thanks for this, I will investigate. Maybe they use their own miner? @all others: sorry for going OT so much, will stop now. If you mine your own blocks, you can ignore the isStandard() checks for transactions, I'm pretty sure (modded mining software - do some reading on luke-jr and Eligius, which accepts/pushes non-standard transactions as well). That would also presumably be how friedcat has been bouncing transactions forward and backward in his wallet(s) to shuffle and subdivide the coins on the books. |
|
|
|
|
|
btcbot
|
|
November 30, 2014, 08:37:16 AM |
|
Well shit, AMHash is cheaper per GHs over at Hashie, and you get 10 GHs free to sign-up Just to clarify, you have to buy at least 20 GH to get that free 10 GH and it's Hashie's own Generation1 contract. WTH, I am now the proud owner of 30 GH of AMHash/Hashie hashing power.  |
Don't tip me... tip the Riseup folks who protect activists around the world. |
|
|
|
jjdub7
|
|
November 30, 2014, 08:39:49 AM |
|
Received my divs on my direct shares as well as on havelock.
Can you forward me the 'sending' address so that I might add them to the spreadsheet? We are still missing proof of **edit** 178 shares. btw. I've updated the spreadsheet with payments from a third address. Known payment addresses for 11/24/2014 dividend138F71yG3gqzhcYowSHw7Qmqos6X2GrRWt *new 115tTroRo3B9ZDQ6ATJGDCHcNEVbjJoZnF 1H7FpBV8huVmPvt5eRzszAkgnERH2FaWvq 1H7FpBV8huVmPvt5eRzszAkgnERH2FaWvq Can everyone reach consensus that 3MkwFfGNQDve7vz1z6gUDVxkuQpcSV3Mz8 is most definitely an ASICMINER address now? Where's stompysteve at? |
|
|
|
|
|
stompysteve
|
|
November 30, 2014, 03:44:20 PM |
|
Received my divs on my direct shares as well as on havelock.
Can you forward me the 'sending' address so that I might add them to the spreadsheet? We are still missing proof of **edit** 178 shares. btw. I've updated the spreadsheet with payments from a third address. Known payment addresses for 11/24/2014 dividend138F71yG3gqzhcYowSHw7Qmqos6X2GrRWt *new 115tTroRo3B9ZDQ6ATJGDCHcNEVbjJoZnF 1H7FpBV8huVmPvt5eRzszAkgnERH2FaWvq 1H7FpBV8huVmPvt5eRzszAkgnERH2FaWvq Can everyone reach consensus that 3MkwFfGNQDve7vz1z6gUDVxkuQpcSV3Mz8 is most definitely an ASICMINER address now? Where's stompysteve at? I've been wanting to redo my wallet tracking post just been very busy, mostly lurking the past month I have some free time today maybe I'll check it out |
|
|
|
|
|
armedmilitia
|
|
November 30, 2014, 04:26:08 PM |
|
Good news everyone! After sending friedcat an email my div showed up. I'm rich, baby, I'm rich!  |
|
|
|
|
kaerf
|
|
December 01, 2014, 12:02:29 AM |
|
Received my divs on my direct shares as well as on havelock.
Can you forward me the 'sending' address so that I might add them to the spreadsheet? We are still missing proof of **edit** 178 shares. btw. I've updated the spreadsheet with payments from a third address. Known payment addresses for 11/24/2014 dividend138F71yG3gqzhcYowSHw7Qmqos6X2GrRWt *new 115tTroRo3B9ZDQ6ATJGDCHcNEVbjJoZnF 1H7FpBV8huVmPvt5eRzszAkgnERH2FaWvq 1H7FpBV8huVmPvt5eRzszAkgnERH2FaWvq Can everyone reach consensus that 3MkwFfGNQDve7vz1z6gUDVxkuQpcSV3Mz8 is most definitely an ASICMINER address now? Where's stompysteve at? If 3Mkw is theirs, then 3KBUuGko4H5ke7EVsq9B7PLK1c5Askdd7y is likely theirs as well  |
|
|
|
|
|
drasted
|
|
December 01, 2014, 01:38:45 AM |
|
Received my divs on my direct shares as well as on havelock.
Can you forward me the 'sending' address so that I might add them to the spreadsheet? We are still missing proof of **edit** 178 shares. btw. I've updated the spreadsheet with payments from a third address. Known payment addresses for 11/24/2014 dividend138F71yG3gqzhcYowSHw7Qmqos6X2GrRWt *new 115tTroRo3B9ZDQ6ATJGDCHcNEVbjJoZnF 1H7FpBV8huVmPvt5eRzszAkgnERH2FaWvq 1H7FpBV8huVmPvt5eRzszAkgnERH2FaWvq Can everyone reach consensus that 3MkwFfGNQDve7vz1z6gUDVxkuQpcSV3Mz8 is most definitely an ASICMINER address now? Where's stompysteve at? What's the relation between 3MkwFfGNQDve7vz1z6gUDVxkuQpcSV3Mz8 and these addresses? Honest question, I've just had a quick look but i can't see it show up in any transactions between them. |
|
|
|
|
|
jjdub7
|
|
December 01, 2014, 05:16:02 AM |
|
Received my divs on my direct shares as well as on havelock.
Can you forward me the 'sending' address so that I might add them to the spreadsheet? We are still missing proof of **edit** 178 shares. btw. I've updated the spreadsheet with payments from a third address. Known payment addresses for 11/24/2014 dividend138F71yG3gqzhcYowSHw7Qmqos6X2GrRWt *new 115tTroRo3B9ZDQ6ATJGDCHcNEVbjJoZnF 1H7FpBV8huVmPvt5eRzszAkgnERH2FaWvq 1H7FpBV8huVmPvt5eRzszAkgnERH2FaWvq Can everyone reach consensus that 3MkwFfGNQDve7vz1z6gUDVxkuQpcSV3Mz8 is most definitely an ASICMINER address now? Where's stompysteve at? What's the relation between 3MkwFfGNQDve7vz1z6gUDVxkuQpcSV3Mz8 and these addresses? Honest question, I've just had a quick look but i can't see it show up in any transactions between them. Try searching for my or others' previous posts here in the thread (search bar will narrow to this thread only). In short, from what I've observed all the way back from tube sales and then later from mining inflows, it appears to be friedcat's main multisig address for storing funds, although AM has since split the wallet across many addresses. |
|
|
|
|
|
stompysteve
|
|
December 02, 2014, 10:45:34 AM |
|
Coming down to the line on the difficulty bet, was it between puppet and someone else? Gonna be a close one I had my money on a drop
|
|
|
|
|
Puppet
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1040
|
|
December 02, 2014, 10:51:29 AM |
|
Not that close. Im taking bets now I will lose that bet |
|
|
|
|
|
raskul
|
|
December 02, 2014, 12:16:13 PM |
|
Not that close. Im taking bets now I will lose that bet Haha how much gave you at stake? |
tips 1APp826DqjJBdsAeqpEstx6Q8hD4urac8a
|
|
|
Puppet
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1040
|
|
December 02, 2014, 12:22:39 PM |
|
how much gave you at stake?
Peanuts (0.1 BTC) |
|
|
|
|
xhomerx10
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3808
Merit: 7912
|
|
December 02, 2014, 01:04:53 PM |
|
how much gave you at stake?
Peanuts (0.1 BTC) Alright, you're on. I'll wager 0.05 that you wont lose the bet. Only 63 blocks to go though... |
|
|
|
|
gogxmagog
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1009
Ad maiora!
|
|
December 02, 2014, 02:02:10 PM |
|
Is there any business arraignment between btc China and AM? Weren't they in line to supply them chips or am I dreaming.
I can't remember
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gws24
|
|
December 02, 2014, 03:09:22 PM |
|
Is there any business arraignment between btc China and AM? Weren't they in line to supply them chips or am I dreaming.
I can't remember
No you're right. Can't find it anymore but there was definitely some press statement (not by am itself) made somewhere that AM was one of the providers along with bitmain I think of the hardware for btcchina pool. If thats true then supposing AM provides half then that is about 6 PH delivered by AM because btcchina pool is at roughly 12 PH right now. |
|
|
|
|
RoadStress
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007
|
|
December 02, 2014, 03:16:58 PM |
|
Peanuts (0.1 BTC)
Alright, you're on. I'll wager 0.05 that you wont lose the bet. Only 63 blocks to go though... I say take the bet Puppet. |
|
|
|
Puppet
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1040
|
|
December 02, 2014, 03:23:27 PM |
|
Alright, you're on. I'll wager 0.05 that you wont lose the bet.
Only 63 blocks to go though...
Ok, its your loss. |
|
|
|
|
Dexter770221
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1029
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 02, 2014, 04:21:27 PM |
|
|
Under development Modular UPGRADEABLE Miner (MUM). Looking for investors.
Changing one PCB with screwdriver and you have brand new miner in hand... Plug&Play, scalable from one module to thousands.
|
|
|
|
