Provided an escrow for us for a trade. It went smoothly. Recommended ++
Then proceeded to publish all the information regarding the trade assuming that the account is still under my ownership. While any private information is forfeit in case of a scam, the escrow should've informed me to avoid any mistake before doing so.
I will not be using him as escrow in future and suggest others avoid too. The trade went smoothly, but his subsequent poor judgementt in trying to show the community that he is an useful member makes him an unreliable escrow.
So he escrowed an account sale then published the account name?
What he said is not true. I mentioned his name, price and to avoid privacy problem, I only mentioned the site which owned that address but not the address. I think this is standard thing here. If not, please correct me.
-snip-
On SellingSenior's feedback it looks like MZ left a feedback saying that he's an alt of "The Bad Guy" so I'm guessing that The Bad Guy account was sold by SellingSenior, and made publicly by MZ afterwards.
No. SellingSenior was the buyer.
You can see my post here --
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1136500.msg12008480#msg12008480.