Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 08:14:16 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Unacceptable oversight...  (Read 939 times)
MoonShadow (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1708
Merit: 1007



View Profile
August 02, 2012, 11:50:56 AM
 #1

http://financialservices.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=304699

For Gavin Andreson to have been overlooked as a witness to this event.  It's not like they don't know we exist.

"The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank...sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world."

- Carroll Quigley, CFR member, mentor to Bill Clinton, from 'Tragedy And Hope'
1714896856
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714896856

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714896856
Reply with quote  #2

1714896856
Report to moderator
1714896856
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714896856

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714896856
Reply with quote  #2

1714896856
Report to moderator
1714896856
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714896856

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714896856
Reply with quote  #2

1714896856
Report to moderator
"In a nutshell, the network works like a distributed timestamp server, stamping the first transaction to spend a coin. It takes advantage of the nature of information being easy to spread but hard to stifle." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714896856
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714896856

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714896856
Reply with quote  #2

1714896856
Report to moderator
1714896856
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714896856

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714896856
Reply with quote  #2

1714896856
Report to moderator
Kluge
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1015



View Profile
August 02, 2012, 11:54:16 AM
 #2

Maybe it should be concerning that NSA had an unprecedented presence at Def Con, which also had large Bitcoin-user attendance, and AFAIK, the only USG agency to ask for Gavin was the CIA. Doesn't sound like particularly welcoming behavior.
herzmeister
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1007



View Profile WWW
August 02, 2012, 01:35:54 PM
 #3

.gov? "Monetary Freedom"? Does not compute.  Huh

https://localbitcoins.com/?ch=80k | BTC: 1LJvmd1iLi199eY7EVKtNQRW3LqZi8ZmmB
knight22
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000


--------------->¿?


View Profile
August 08, 2012, 02:07:34 AM
 #4

.gov? "Monetary Freedom"? Does not compute.  Huh

It's a minority

Bitcoin Oz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


Wat


View Profile WWW
August 08, 2012, 02:46:45 AM
 #5

One of them tried to mention bitcoin during those hearings but he said "something....coin" instead  Smiley

TECSHARE
In memoriam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3318
Merit: 1958


First Exclusion Ever


View Profile WWW
August 16, 2012, 09:08:17 AM
 #6

One of the first steps of preventing growth of a diametrically opposed system to the one you control, is to marginalize it by pretending as if it doesn't exist while subsidizing systems that are beneficial to your power structure. Seems to be the care here.
eb3full
VIP
Full Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 198
Merit: 101


View Profile
August 16, 2012, 09:29:23 AM
 #7

Maybe it should be concerning that NSA had an unprecedented presence at Def Con, which also had large Bitcoin-user attendance, and AFAIK, the only USG agency to ask for Gavin was the CIA. Doesn't sound like particularly welcoming behavior.

NSA is perfectly free to attend DEFCON and they've never been discouraged from doing so in the past. One of the tenets of DEFCON is that individuals from all perspectives and positions -- government, big business or otherwise -- should be able to open up a dialogue with the security community. We only benefit from increased speech and participation.

They might be a bit creepy (and people are justified being wary of them) but their strategic interests are aligned with the passions of DEFCON attendees. No need to feel intimidated. DEFCON has been on the government's radar for a long time. Now they're actually treating it like a constructive resource and handing it some legitimacy.

"With four parameters I can fit an elephant, and with five I can make him wiggle his trunk." John von Neumann
buy me beer: 1HG9cBBYME4HUVhfAqQvW9Vqwh3PLioHcU
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!