Bitcoin Forum

Alternate cryptocurrencies => Mining (Altcoins) => Topic started by: Eliovp on January 21, 2016, 11:11:12 PM



Title: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Eliovp on January 21, 2016, 11:11:12 PM
Hello,

I've been working on a website for every GPU miner out there to make it a bit easier to find/set a configuration of his/her needs.

This because i have been seeing a lot of newer and also older miners out there with lots of questions about what software, config, etc.. is best.

I know there have been and maybe still are similar websites as this one. But i will be keeping this one up to date (+ it looks better as well :p) and possibly connect it to software that will auto input the details in there directly from your mining rig (The idea is somewhat similar to the nice hash software, but with an option to post your config/card and or load a config) <-- still working on this idea with someone else.

For now it is already possible to submit your configuration/card.
(I will need to activate this first before it will be shown in the list "yeah, there are always guys out there with false information")
This will go fast because i will get an email every time someone submits a config/card.

It's still in beta so you will probably find some bugs here and there..

Link: here (http://www.mininghwcomparison.com)


So please, do a little effort and submit some configs. it will take you not more than 5 minutes of your time and will be very helpful for others and maybe/possibly for yourself as well!

If you have suggestions or remarks to improve this. Please send me a pm or join #mininghwcomparison on freenode (i will add a contact form later)
Or you can pull a request over at github where i open sourced the project.
link: https://github.com/Eliovp/Mining-Hardware-Comparison


Thx!


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: crsminer on January 22, 2016, 10:41:01 AM
Great initiative!

I have submitted results from my 750Ti 1GB running Lyra2v2.
Will add more.

Thanks!


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Eliovp on January 22, 2016, 12:48:53 PM
Great initiative!

I have submitted results from my 750Ti 1GB running Lyra2v2.
Will add more.

Thanks!
It's active! Think you for your submission!!

Some of my rows are a bit Mixed up, Will fix this asap ☺️


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Eliovp on January 22, 2016, 07:28:01 PM
Fixed some minor issues. Submitting will be smooth and activating (for me) as well.

Please keep submitting cards guys!

For those that have done already thank you! :)


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Eliovp on January 24, 2016, 10:37:55 AM
Okay, i have done some updates.

It's now possible to browse between algorithms (added that in the menu)

Filter options have been slightly improved.

Still need more cards! Especially Nvidia!


Please keep submitting guys!


Mining Hardware Comparison (http://www.mininghwcomparison.com)


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: o3u on January 24, 2016, 06:14:54 PM
I don't see anything listed


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Eliovp on January 24, 2016, 08:40:34 PM
I don't see anything listed

Sure there are mate.

You have 2 big blue buttons at the front page


"Complete list of amd based Graphic cards" and "Complete list of nvidia based Graphic cards"

Just click one of those and you'll get a complete list of that brand.



Than, if you check on top you can filter between amd & nvidia and directly specify an algo.

:)


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Blawpaw on January 24, 2016, 11:55:08 PM
I like the idea a lot! I'm an old miner and sometimes I also have doubts, especially with new algos.
Your site will come in handy and help others with their own configurations!
People need to start contributing because it still has very little information submitted


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Eliovp on January 25, 2016, 06:32:16 AM
I like the idea a lot! I'm an old miner and sometimes I also have doubts, especially with new algos.
Your site will come in handy and help others with their own configurations!
People need to start contributing because it still has very little information submitted


Thank you :)

Exactly! It doesn't take much time to add a few configs + you'll help out others and possibly yourself!

Thx for those that are adding cards/configs! Much appreciated!!

:)


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Eliovp on January 25, 2016, 09:38:54 PM
Some new small changes added/adjusted.

Tables are auto toggled open now. Some extra filter options added. You can click on a header to filter Ascending and Descending.


As i see that it's picking up, i got a domain name.


Link = http://www.mininghwcomparison.com


 8)


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Eliovp on January 26, 2016, 10:15:48 PM
New update!


Ethereum configs have built in calculator if you click "More Info"

screenshot

http://s11.postimg.org/o4onpfcoj/Schermafbeelding_2016_01_26_om_23_15_02.png


 8)


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Eliovp on January 27, 2016, 10:02:01 PM
Blake256 (Decred) added to the list!  8)


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: atp1916 on January 30, 2016, 09:53:25 PM
Elio, perhaps you could post that irc room you put up?

It would be an efficient way (for those who use IRC) to drop in and message you about the site.


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Eliovp on January 30, 2016, 10:55:29 PM
Hey atp,

#mininghwcomparison on freenode.

had a very busy few days, noticed some bugs here and there that i need to fix. Menu is a little screwy as well.

Everyone's welcome with questions/remarks or for a chit chat :)


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: MaxDZ8 on January 31, 2016, 08:40:26 AM
Can you somewhat make UI denser?
There are the old MYR comparisons around... I hope this time gathering the information is successful, it would be about time this data is found and made coherent!


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Eliovp on January 31, 2016, 10:54:25 AM
Can you somewhat make UI denser?
There are the old MYR comparisons around... I hope this time gathering the information is successful, it would be about time this data is found and made coherent!

Hey Max

Don't exactly know what you mean by making the user interface denser. Could you explain what you mean by that?


Or could you get on irc perhaps? freenode #mininghwcomparison


Thx :)


Edit: Ok, i think i know what you mean, you have to click around to much to get to the data you want/need.

Been thinking about that, on how to make it more user friendly.

Will try some things out. Thx for your comment! Really appreciate it!


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: crsminer on February 02, 2016, 05:41:15 PM
Is there a way to confirm that submitted hashrates are real? I mean, one user (alevlaslo) submitted results for a R9 390 - 38.84 MH/s!

I see that you have a "comment" box in "More info" tab, but is inactive. Maybe you should make it active so we can discuss there about the results posted.

Also, maybe you can add another field with print screen?

Thanks!


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Eliovp on February 02, 2016, 05:55:54 PM
Is there a way to confirm that submitted hashrates are real? I mean, one user (alevlaslo) submitted results for a R9 390 - 38.84 MH/s!

I see that you have a "comment" box in "More info" tab, but is inactive. Maybe you should make it active so we can discuss there about the results posted.

Also, maybe you can add another field with print screen?

Thanks!

Hey Crsminer, thank you for posting.

You're right. That is a bit over it. At this time i'm just relying on those who submit.

There is an option to post a screenshot. But nobody does :(.

I'm working with someone on something new to add. So that the inputs cannot be wrong. I'll explain this later.


That comment box is broken somehow. it "use" to work :p
I need to get into that asap.

Thx for letting me know!

I'll post back when it's fixed :)

(was wondering why no one posted any comments.. that explains :p)


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Eliovp on February 02, 2016, 06:03:18 PM
Is there a way to confirm that submitted hashrates are real? I mean, one user (alevlaslo) submitted results for a R9 390 - 38.84 MH/s!

I see that you have a "comment" box in "More info" tab, but is inactive. Maybe you should make it active so we can discuss there about the results posted.

Also, maybe you can add another field with print screen?

Thanks!

Hey Crsminer, thank you for posting.

You're right. That is a bit over it. At this time i'm just relying on those who submit.

There is an option to post a screenshot. But nobody does :(.

I'm working with someone on something new to add. So that the inputs cannot be wrong. I'll explain this later.


That comment box is broken somehow. it "use" to work :p
I need to get into that asap.

Thx for letting me know!

I'll post back when it's fixed :)

(was wondering why no one posted any comments.. that explains :p)

Fixed it :)


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: crsminer on February 02, 2016, 06:08:08 PM
Sure :) I really liked your idea and this site can become very useful to the miners.

Another thing that I was thinking regarding the calculator page. If you add another field with card cost in usd, you can calculate ROI as well.
Or even better, insert this field into the "Submit your card configuration" page.
Maybe then we can sort after ROI :)

P.S. I know prices vary , but we can make an idea...


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: ol92 on February 18, 2016, 09:45:49 AM
Great comparison : thanks!


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Eliovp on February 19, 2016, 11:09:53 AM
Great comparison : thanks!

You're welcome.

Still have a lot on my "Todo list". But have been having it very busy lately so i pushed that little project a little to the side.

Will definitely work on it as soon as i've got some spare time.

Thx for liking it :)


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Eliovp on March 05, 2016, 01:05:23 PM
Thx for everyone that has been submitting configs/cards.

We now have 170 active configs/cards.

Please keep them coming!

I will clean up as soon as i find some time to do this.
My apologies for that.


Again, keep it as honest as you can please.
It has no point of submitting configs that aren't realistic.
That doesn't help anyone.


I will do some extra modifications on the commenting system as this isn't optimal at this point.

Thx again!


Greetings!


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Eliovp on March 14, 2016, 06:19:21 PM
I've been seeing some unrealistic entries lately.

Please keep it honest guys.

An R9 380 just cannot do 41Mh/s @ Ethereum on stock clocks. I doubt that even if it would be heavily OC'ed it wouldn't even get that high.

Same for a 390 (non x). That card just does not do 40Mh on Ethereum. I own that card myself and at those clocks i barely hit 30Mh.

So please keep it as honest as possible.

Thx


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: MaxDZ8 on March 15, 2016, 04:28:46 PM
Have you considered they might be running custom kernels?


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Eliovp on March 15, 2016, 05:26:02 PM
Have you considered they might be running custom kernels?

I have yes.

Knowing a few devs here, i'm pretty sure there isn't an optimized kernel out there that does those kind of speeds :)

But if it was true. They should mention it.


Greetings :)


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: ol92 on March 15, 2016, 05:57:56 PM
Have you considered they might be running custom kernels?

I have yes.

Knowing a few devs here, i'm pretty sure there isn't an optimized kernel out there that does those kind of speeds :)

But if it was true. They should mention it.


Greetings :)
Benchmarking eth mining is tricky : if you use the built in benchmark, it will use the initial dag which will leads to higher scores for most cards. Moreover, you will have some significant variances between the differents runs: the builtin bench will give the max/mean/min, but I suppose some people have given the max instead of the mean.
Regards


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Tmdz on March 18, 2016, 06:42:26 AM
I wanted to thank the op and give him a free bump for this awesome chart (really it should be sticky'd), this has helped me tremendously on choosing a gpu that would work for me.  You do have to ignore a few of those out of range scores but in general most of ratings appear to be pretty accurate and I added a old card to the list.


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Eliovp on March 18, 2016, 08:22:07 AM
I wanted to thank the op and give him a free bump for this awesome chart (really it should be sticky'd), this has helped me tremendously on choosing a gpu that would work for me.  You do have to ignore a few of those out of range scores but in general most of ratings appear to be pretty accurate and I added a old card to the list.

Thank you very much for your kind words.

This is more valuable to me then money!

Really appreciate it! :-)


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: ashkanb on March 20, 2016, 05:07:23 PM
great list, really easy to navigate, sort ,filter and compare different gpus to see which one would best fit specific tasks.

keep up the good work. :)


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Eliovp on March 20, 2016, 07:29:51 PM
great list, really easy to navigate, sort ,filter and compare different gpus to see which one would best fit specific tasks.

keep up the good work. :)

Will do! Thank you!

Definitely need some spare time to do some upgrades/clean up.

Future plans :p


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: rednoW on March 21, 2016, 08:02:49 PM
2 Eliovp

Could you please post gpu-z screenshot from Fury (Nano) mining etherium? Is there a memory controller load data?
How do you think what is the reason why Fury cannot beat Hawaii in ETH mining?


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: ol92 on March 21, 2016, 08:20:49 PM
2 Eliovp

Could you please post gpu-z screenshot from Fury (Nano) mining etherium? Is there a memory controller load data?
How do you think what is the reason why Fury cannot beat Hawaii in ETH mining?
From the results, non oc fury beats non oc hawaï and oc fury is just a little bit better than oc hawaï but at a lower power.

Beside pure compute performance, one key point is memory latency access in eth mining + some memory cache: hbm is very good for bandwith but not so much for latency.
On nvidia side, a GTX 970 is almost as good as a GTX 980 Ti probably due to issue with memory cache or latency...



Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Eliovp on March 21, 2016, 09:11:34 PM
2 Eliovp

Could you please post gpu-z screenshot from Fury (Nano) mining etherium? Is there a memory controller load data?
How do you think what is the reason why Fury cannot beat Hawaii in ETH mining?

I could do that from one of my nano's yes. Fury not anymore, i sold those.



I'm sure a Fury can beat any hawaii card. If you OC it high enough that is :)

Same for Hawaii, if you run a high end hawaii card at stock clocks, and you run a fury x at stock clocks it'll go faster.

If you oc that hawaii card, it'll beat that fury. Obviously....


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: rednoW on March 22, 2016, 06:39:52 AM
Thanx, I already got it
https://forum.bits.media/uploads/monthly_03_2016/post-18272-0-01669700-1458609815_thumb.jpeg

Definetly memory latency issue ... or not optimal opencl code for ethhash to use all the 4k CU's

Here is 290x doing 32-33mh for comparison
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-MhP7uQWcN5U/VvDqXkWfi-I/AAAAAAAABGc/-d7RPGargsIcFbYSSCvEv8V2Vb_Wzjt5ACCo/s800-Ic42/290x_1200_1500_eth.jpg


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Ayers on March 22, 2016, 07:14:35 AM
i hope they will fix that issue with the new generation of gpu for nvidia, or ethereum will remain preferabely with amd gpu, and no competition is bad, it make gpu more expensive


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Yutard on March 31, 2016, 06:58:15 AM
Does anybody notice when the DAG files become larger, the R9 390 and Nano's hash rate also decrease?


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Eliovp on March 31, 2016, 06:56:51 PM
Does anybody notice when the DAG files become larger, the R9 390 and Nano's hash rate also decrease?

I haven't noticed any decrease in speed with my Nano's, neither on my 390's.

Maybe when the DAG reaches +2GB. But i doubt it..


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Eliovp on March 31, 2016, 07:01:50 PM
Btw.

Over 300 Cards/configs already!

Keep em coming guys!

Yeah i know, i seriously need to do an upgrade....

http://s16.postimg.org/6t519eeph/Schermafbeelding_2016_03_31_om_21_00_30.png


Those 14 Inactive cards are either Unrealistic or incomplete submissions...


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Lucentar on March 31, 2016, 08:18:37 PM
Does anybody notice when the DAG files become larger, the R9 390 and Nano's hash rate also decrease?

I haven't noticed any decrease in speed with my Nano's, neither on my 390's.

Maybe when the DAG reaches +2GB. But i doubt it..

The DAG file size is only 1.3GB at the moment, why the 280x hash rate dropped from 28 to 22 MH/s, while it has 3GB memory?


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: ashkanb on April 09, 2016, 08:40:10 PM
OP i submitted my gpu's info to your list today; there's a slight problem though!
not sure whether i mistyped or something else happened;
the driver is listed as "Crimson 15.1.1 Beta" that is not correct; it's "Crimson 15.11.1 Beta";
also, i mentioned my speed as "18~18.8" and only the "~18.8" made it to the list; that'd be misleading.
if i'm only allowed a single number i'd like to input the average of around 18.5 Mhs.

is there any way i can edit and correct my entry? or will someone be doing that?!

p.s. i made the entry with the same name as my user id here in bitcointalk.


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Eliovp on April 09, 2016, 10:48:59 PM
changed it.

No there is no way you can change it (yet)

Again, i have so much to update. My list is only growing lately..

I will get some time to sorten things out though.

Maybe i'll add a registration part so people can add/modify configs.

I'm the only one who can allow/modify them at this moment. Maybe that will change as well.

Never thought this would be such a success.

Thx for your submission none the less!


Oh yeah, i changed the speed to the average because the filter option would go crazy on it if i left it as you submitted it :)

Also need to to some changes to that....

Like i said, todo list is only growing.. :)


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: umop-apisdn on April 10, 2016, 12:27:00 AM
This is great, I really appreciate your efforts.

I hope to pull something together soon and your site is really helping!!


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Eliovp on May 03, 2016, 10:21:35 PM
This is great, I really appreciate your efforts.

I hope to pull something together soon and your site is really helping!!

Thank you for those kind words!


I have updated the website a bit.

Cleaned up a lot of things, not only visual things.

For those that have visited or/and still are, you'll see the difference immediately when checking configs.


Also, the submission form has been a little modified. (Will re-write that later).

As for my to-do list, been finding some extra time here and there, so it'll get there eventually :p

Greetings!


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: QuintLeo on May 04, 2016, 07:56:59 AM
The NVidia maxwll cards can't match the hashrate of AMD cards - but they're more power-efficient, on a hash/W basis they actually don't fare too badly (except the 750ti which doesn't have enough RAM to work well IF at all on Ethereum).

 On a hash/$ basis they .... well, get them used they might be in the same ballpark as the USED AMD cards a lot of folks keep talking about buying.



Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Yutard on May 05, 2016, 08:07:11 PM
The NVidia maxwll cards can't match the hashrate of AMD cards - but they're more power-efficient, on a hash/W basis they actually don't fare too badly (except the 750ti which doesn't have enough RAM to work well IF at all on Ethereum).

 On a hash/$ basis they .... well, get them used they might be in the same ballpark as the USED AMD cards a lot of folks keep talking about buying.



I undervoltage a XFX R9 390, its hash i 27.5 MH/s at 977/1040 MHz. The power consumption is 160W, so it is better than nV 970.


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: QuintLeo on May 06, 2016, 06:06:39 AM
My pair of 970s are running well under that 160 watts mining Ethereium - complete system with an A10-5700 and 2 of those cards is only around 300 watts (yeah, the A10 is overkill but I already HAD the system and it's 2-slot mATH motherboard up and running).

 I'd GUESS they're pulling 100-120 watts or so, though they're only pulling about 20.5Mh/s

 My triple GTX950 system pulls a bit over 30MH/s on a TOTAL consumption of under 350 watts (that's an A10-8760K that's running Prime95 on the CPUs, Dnet on the GPU, as well as the Nvidias themselves - guessing 80-90 watts each for the cards at most).


 I do wish I could get my HD 7870 to do Ethereum though - but it keeps hanging on the "can't load the full core" part then the miner just SITS there, left it on overnight once and it still didn't go - same system with one of the GTX970s and NVidea drivers instead of fglrx ran fine, abet it took forever generating the first couple DAG files (Semperon 3000 with 1 Gig ram, yeah it's kinda funny the vid cards have twice the ram the SYSTEM does).
 I might try it on a "bigger" system at some point to see if the hangup is the limits of the CPU/system ram not the GPU - I've got a 5050e 2Gig system I'm in process of shutting down MPrime on with plans to put some sort of vidcards in it to mine with instead.

 For now, the poor 7870 folds for Curecoin.....


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Unacceptable on May 06, 2016, 10:29:37 AM
My pair of 970s are running well under that 160 watts mining Ethereium - complete system with an A10-5700 and 2 of those cards is only around 300 watts (yeah, the A10 is overkill but I already HAD the system and it's 2-slot mATH motherboard up and running).

 I'd GUESS they're pulling 100-120 watts or so, though they're only pulling about 20.5Mh/s

 My triple GTX950 system pulls a bit over 30MH/s on a TOTAL consumption of under 350 watts (that's an A10-8760K that's running Prime95 on the CPUs, Dnet on the GPU, as well as the Nvidias themselves - guessing 80-90 watts each for the cards at most).


 I do wish I could get my HD 7870 to do Ethereum though - but it keeps hanging on the "can't load the full core" part then the miner just SITS there, left it on overnight once and it still didn't go - same system with one of the GTX970s and NVidea drivers instead of fglrx ran fine, abet it took forever generating the first couple DAG files (Semperon 3000 with 1 Gig ram, yeah it's kinda funny the vid cards have twice the ram the SYSTEM does).
 I might try it on a "bigger" system at some point to see if the hangup is the limits of the CPU/system ram not the GPU - I've got a 5050e 2Gig system I'm in process of shutting down MPrime on with plans to put some sort of vidcards in it to mine with instead.

 For now, the poor 7870 folds for Curecoin.....


Did you go to the ET hash folder & delete the DAG & start it again???  It may help  ;)


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: ldw-com on May 06, 2016, 11:02:26 AM
Oh btw.

If there are developers out there that are willing to help, send me a pm. This account or my main account "Eliovp".

I'll throw some btc, obviously not much because this is completely ad-free and done in my free time.

But looking at the traffic that is generated, this website has potential :) (4-500 clicks per day)

Greetings!


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Andy777s on May 06, 2016, 04:45:59 PM
It is important to specify miner software and its version along with driver version. Claymors ETH miner gives me 21.5MH on 380X while I managed to get 18.5MH with official ETH miner.


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Eliovp on May 08, 2016, 07:51:06 AM
Got over 500 Configs/Cards active at this moment.

Thx everyone for their submissions! Appreciate it!

Keep em coming!

Will update the website as soon and as regular as i can.


My offer is still open...

Oh btw.

If there are developers out there that are willing to help, send me a pm. This account or my main account "Eliovp".

I'll throw some btc, obviously not much because this is completely ad-free and done in my free time.

But looking at the traffic that is generated, this website has potential :) (4-500 clicks per day)

Greetings!


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: ekiller on May 22, 2016, 07:56:01 PM
what happened to your website ? http://www.mininghwcomparison.com/ 
can not be displayed. Only white empty page


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Eliovp on May 22, 2016, 08:26:38 PM
Script kiddies flooding my database..

Kind of dumb of me not setting up captcha..

Will do when i'm back from holiday..

Greetings and sorry!


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: fr4nkthetank on May 24, 2016, 02:03:58 AM
Script kiddies flooding my database..

Kind of dumb of me not setting up captcha..

Will do when i'm back from holiday..

Greetings and sorry!

sorry to hear that, a lot of people are assholes in crypto...because of money.


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: QuintLeo on May 24, 2016, 06:55:48 AM
Your site works pretty well in Firefox, but current Chrome version it never loads anything.
 Might be an XP issue though, Google has stated they no longer support XP for Chrome updates (kinda dumb given how many CORPORATE machines still run XP).


 DO NOT SET UP CRAPCHA. That stuff SUCKS. It's a cure that is MUCH worse than the disease.


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: ldw-com on May 29, 2016, 03:23:27 PM
Ok, It's back up with google Recaptcha. So no normal captcha where you never type the correct sequence from the first time.

So just check the checkbox and you'll be fine!

Greetings!


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: ZedZedNova on May 29, 2016, 04:57:43 PM
Ok, It's back up with google Recaptcha. So no normal captcha where you never type the correct sequence from the first time.

So just check the checkbox and you'll be fine!

Greetings!

Thanks! I just provided my info/config.

- zed


Title: Re: Mining Hardware Comparison
Post by: Eliovp on June 28, 2016, 09:53:09 PM
Hey guys,

I put the website on github today.

In other words, if there is anyone out there in the mood to help out, or clean it up a bit.. or whatever..

Please go ahead :)

https://github.com/Eliovp/Mining-Hardware-Comparison


Greetings!