|
Title: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ Ring Signatures | Anonymous | TOR | Stealth Addresses Post by: Eclipse Crypto on February 27, 2016, 10:02:43 AM https://i.imgur.com/dGFqNbU.jpg https://i.imgur.com/S5JY1mx.png https://i.imgur.com/wSvwXTC.png Ring signatures are the basis of all the anonymous features of Eclipse. Ring signatures obsfucate the originator of a message so that the only mathematical proof that can be attained is that 1 person out of N people is the original writer of a given message. The message can take the form of proposing a new rule, donating tokens, transferring property, or leaking confidential material. https://i.imgur.com/1qhASDa.jpg By design, ring signatures require the computation of a value known as a „key image“. Key images in Eclipse are generated using an algorithm known as „Try-and-Increment“, a cryptographically secure method for mapping a scalar hash to a point on the elliptic curve. The security of Try-and-Increment comes from the fact that this method does not rely on the group generator (i.e. basepoint) of the elliptic curve. The inclusion of our implementation of Try-and-Increment, based on the algorithm proposed in How to Hash into Elliptic Curves (https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6WcJrXCGAnLNjhWekZ4T1c1blk), is our only modification to the optimized libsecp256k1 library that is used in libbitcoincore. https://i.imgur.com/oGqTDkp.png (http://eclipsecrypto.com/)https://i.imgur.com/CkwXw1i.png (https://twitter.com/eclipsecrypto)https://i.imgur.com/xGw6tSY.png (https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/) https://i.imgur.com/S1FUnoT.png (https://eclipsecrypto.herokuapp.com/) https://i.imgur.com/tOqcYFW.png Ticker: EC Algorithm: SHA-256d PoW/PoS with Independent Targeting PoW Block Time: 256 seconds (4 minutes) Max PoW Mining Supply: 2.78 Million (last block 4725) PoW Reward: 4027 EC halving every 337.5 blocks PoS V2 PoS Min Age: 8 hours HiPoS Length: 4 Weeks HiPoS Reward: 300 Corona, decreasing by 10/day to 20 Corona Post-HiPoS Reward: 10 Corona Parameters Algo: SHA256d Fee (Comission): 0.0002 EC Secp256k1: New (bitcoin) Language: C++ Ports Port: 35914 (testnet: 35915) RPC Port: 45914 (testnet: 45915) https://i.imgur.com/WR67Dww.jpg Blockchains that are forks of ByteCoin, the original CryptoNote token, use Ed25519 (see: High-speed high-security signatures (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13389-012-0027-1)), an elliptic curve in a Twisted Edwards form, for their digital signatures. Ed25519 is birationally equivalent to Curve25519, an elliptic curve in Montgomery form, originally studied by D.J. Bernstein in Curve25519: new Diffie-Hellman speed records (https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6WcJrXCGAnLaUpmM0tXb2czQW8). Unfortunately, one cannot be entirely certain if the parameters that were used for Curve25519 (and the subsequently derived parameters for Ed25519) were chosen in such a way to allow a backdoor by the NIST (which has been known to happen with SECP256R1 due to the Snowden revelations) due to choosing the restrictive parameter space a posteriori after a suitably (insecure) curve had been constructed. It is our opinion that neither the security of this curve nor the integrity of Bernstein is up for debate. However, SECP256K1, a Koblitz curve, had parameters chosen by a community of cryptographers as opposed to one cryptographer; it is our opinion that one researcher could be a malicious actor easier than multiple researchers acting in a Byzantine manner. We decided to use the SECP256K1 elliptic curve for Eclipse due to its parameters being chosen publicly in a way to achieve fast arithmetic operations and its long-standing usage with blockchains. https://i.imgur.com/df0dH3l.png Our Team is dedicated to the long-term success of Eclipse Crypto. However, ‘long-term success’ are mere words unless we back them up with action. We have decided to impose a restriction to the access of 1.4 Million EC of our Development Fund wallet using the CheckLockTimeVerify (CLTV) operation. Using this built-in script functionality, we made it so that 1/40 of the tokens that are in control of the Founding Team will become available at the beginning of every quarter for the next 10 years. This action effectively reduces the supply by 40% and gradually increases the access to the coins over the next decade. We are the first cryptocurrency development team to combine these features to create a long-term funding model. We believe that by doing this, we demonstrate our commitment to the development of Eclipse Crypto, not with words, but with recorded, transparent, and provable actions that can be queried on the blockchain. In addition, the coins that are locked away for the next 10 years will not be staking. The Development Fund will be paid quarterly over 10 years: · 1 part for each of the 6 Team Members (to pay for continued development and code maintenance) · 1 part for bounties, marketing, and promotional events / community prizes The remaining 89770 Eclipse from the developers’ public address build the Eclipse Marketing & Development Fund which can be found here: Eco2cHFa6TvTDFhUpdQVvRbMvsajg1ox8A (https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/address.dws?3.htm) The 1.4 Million Eclipse will be locked using CLTV for the forementioned purpose and can be found here (non staking) : ELM61RTMp9Rd13YRwfHxPHrCf8i3p2tu7X (https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/address.dws?13258.htm) https://i.imgur.com/h6ifio8.png https://i.imgur.com/PEyDtsD.png (https://bitbucket.org/EclipseCrypto/eclipse-releases/raw/9bd27571239dcd77a44e6b3dd96eea5673c1cad0/Eclipse-Qt-1.0.0.zip)https://i.imgur.com/GU98Byy.png (https://bitbucket.org/EclipseCrypto/eclipse-releases/raw/9bd27571239dcd77a44e6b3dd96eea5673c1cad0/Eclipse-Qt.dmg)https://i.imgur.com/srAwTQE.png (https://github.com/EclipseCrypto/eclipse) https://i.imgur.com/9ZMUp6m.png (http://eclipsecrypto.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/eclipse-crypto-whitepaper.pdf) https://i.imgur.com/o7HMSG7.png 1. Anonymous Proposals You, along with Alice, Bob, Charlie, and Dianna, belong to an organization that creates rules that determine how everyone behave towards one another. You want to propose a rule that benefits yourself, Bob, and Dianna. However, you have a strong working relationship with Alice and Charlie and don’t want them to find out that you proposed a new law that doesn’t benefit them. With ring signatures, you can hide the fact that you were the one who suggested this new rule. https://i.imgur.com/HsPPaPR.png 2. Anonymous Donations You support an organization that is run by Alice and Bob. Eve is collecting information for Gordon to know who supports and donates to Alice and Bob’s organization. You can donate to Alice and Bob’s organization without Eve finding out and telling Gordon with the use of ring signatures. You support Alice for a particular political office. However, you are not able to donate more than a certain amount to her campaign due to individual contribution limits. With ring signatures, you can avoid these rules by hiding the fact that you are the person donating to Alice’s campaign. https://i.imgur.com/HsPPaPR.png 3. Anonymous Money Transfers You are working in China and make more than $50,000 worth of Yuan in a year. You are afraid that China’s central bank may decide to debase their currency even further, rendering your current holdings in the Yuan worth less. You recently read the news how the Chinese government is trying to stop people from transfering more money out of China than they are allowed using Bitcoin. Eclipse, with its implementation of ring signatures for anonymous money transfers, allows you to circumvent China’s currency exportation laws and anonymously transfer more money out of the country than you are allowed by law. https://i.imgur.com/HsPPaPR.png 4. Anonymous Property Transfers You possess a digital token that represents ownership of some type of property. You can anonymously transfer your property, and the underlying token that represents ownership, to someone else using ring signatures. https://i.imgur.com/HsPPaPR.png 5. Anonymous Whistle Blowing You work for an organization that is performing actions that you believe are unjust. However, you fear for your life if you speak out and tell others about these unfair practices. With the help of ring signatures, you can be an anonymous whistleblower and bring to light the activities with which you do not agree. https://i.imgur.com/d6hYqo2.png https://i.imgur.com/l0ELiIH.png (https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/Exchange/?market=EC_BTC) Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward▲ Mine Now! Post by: Black Mamba on February 27, 2016, 10:18:46 AM No Pool?
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward▲ Mine Now! Post by: Crypt0bull on February 27, 2016, 10:40:34 AM Wow... what a silent launch
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward▲ Mine Now! Post by: Mark Zuckerberg on February 27, 2016, 10:43:09 AM Please provide us with a pool to mine on.
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward▲ Mine Now! Post by: Wednesdaycat on February 27, 2016, 10:44:26 AM OUT OF SYNC
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward▲ Mine Now! Post by: jambo110 on February 27, 2016, 11:45:18 AM :P
Anyone doing some wallet checks yet ? Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward▲ Mine Now! Post by: KJMZNine on February 27, 2016, 11:48:42 AM not available pools ??
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward▲ Mine Now! Post by: notsofast on February 27, 2016, 01:15:12 PM This is like the 6th relaunch of a coin called Eclipse
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward▲ Mine Now! Post by: blastk on February 27, 2016, 01:30:53 PM This is like the 6th relaunch of a coin called Eclipse The name explains how it ends Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward▲ Mine Now! Post by: z38630610 on February 27, 2016, 03:28:12 PM 23:33:41  getmininginfo 23:33:41  { "blocks" : 82, "currentblocksize" : 1000, "currentblocktx" : 0, "difficulty" : { "proof-of-work" : 6426186.76392201, "proof-of-stake" : 0.00097655, "search-interval" : 15 }, "blockvalue" : 402700000000, "netmhashps" : 22240340.03951096, "netstakeweight" : 0.00000000, "errors" : "", "pooledtx" : 0, "stakeweight" : { "combined" : 0 }, "stakeinterest" : 2000000, "testnet" : false } 23:27:43  getpeerinfo 23:27:43  [ { "id" : 1, "addr" : "dcciiab5wabbfl2r.onion:35914", "services" : "10000001b", "lastsend" : 1456586841, "lastrecv" : 1456586843, "bytessent" : 2461, "bytesrecv" : 2800, "conntime" : 1456584916, "version" : 60017, "subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/", "inbound" : false, "chainheight" : 82, "banscore" : 0 }, { "id" : 6, "addr" : "6ljiyejfrjun2rhs.onion:35914", "services" : "10000001b", "lastsend" : 1456586856, "lastrecv" : 1456586857, "bytessent" : 1490, "bytesrecv" : 1531, "conntime" : 1456584934, "version" : 60017, "subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/", "inbound" : false, "chainheight" : 82, "banscore" : 0 }, { "id" : 8, "addr" : "ktrhahru3igoahig.onion:35914", "services" : "10000001b", "lastsend" : 1456586746, "lastrecv" : 1456586747, "bytessent" : 1367, "bytesrecv" : 1463, "conntime" : 1456584944, "version" : 60017, "subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/", "inbound" : false, "chainheight" : 82, "banscore" : 0 }, { "id" : 13, "addr" : "z7r3sczd4hxm53mg.onion:35914", "services" : "10000001b", "lastsend" : 1456586754, "lastrecv" : 1456586754, "bytessent" : 1422, "bytesrecv" : 1573, "conntime" : 1456584952, "version" : 60017, "subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/", "inbound" : false, "chainheight" : 82, "banscore" : 0 }, { "id" : 23, "addr" : "127.0.0.1:53837", "services" : "10000001b", "lastsend" : 1456586796, "lastrecv" : 1456586796, "bytessent" : 1628, "bytesrecv" : 1422, "conntime" : 1456584994, "version" : 60017, "subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/", "inbound" : true, "chainheight" : 82, "banscore" : 0 }, { "id" : 62, "addr" : "itrajv7ef5foccrz.onion:35914", "services" : "10000001b", "lastsend" : 1456586856, "lastrecv" : 1456586857, "bytessent" : 1163, "bytesrecv" : 1259, "conntime" : 1456585414, "version" : 60017, "subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/", "inbound" : false, "chainheight" : 82, "banscore" : 0 }, { "id" : 63, "addr" : "127.0.0.1:53986", "services" : "10000001b", "lastsend" : 1456586807, "lastrecv" : 1456586807, "bytessent" : 1191, "bytesrecv" : 1095, "conntime" : 1456585485, "version" : 60017, "subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/", "inbound" : true, "chainheight" : 82, "banscore" : 0 }, { "id" : 64, "addr" : "127.0.0.1:53997", "services" : "10000001b", "lastsend" : 1456586762, "lastrecv" : 1456586762, "bytessent" : 1123, "bytesrecv" : 1082, "conntime" : 1456585558, "version" : 60017, "subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/", "inbound" : true, "chainheight" : 82, "banscore" : 0 }, { "id" : 65, "addr" : "127.0.0.1:53998", "services" : "10000001b", "lastsend" : 1456586765, "lastrecv" : 1456586764, "bytessent" : 1123, "bytesrecv" : 1027, "conntime" : 1456585562, "version" : 60017, "subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/", "inbound" : true, "chainheight" : 82, "banscore" : 0 }, { "id" : 66, "addr" : "127.0.0.1:53999", "services" : "10000001b", "lastsend" : 1456586770, "lastrecv" : 1456586771, "bytessent" : 1123, "bytesrecv" : 1027, "conntime" : 1456585567, "version" : 60017, "subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/", "inbound" : true, "chainheight" : 82, "banscore" : 0 }, { "id" : 67, "addr" : "127.0.0.1:54001", "services" : "10000001b", "lastsend" : 1456586773, "lastrecv" : 1456586773, "bytessent" : 1288, "bytesrecv" : 1027, "conntime" : 1456585570, "version" : 60017, "subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/", "inbound" : true, "chainheight" : 82, "banscore" : 0 }, { "id" : 68, "addr" : "127.0.0.1:54006", "services" : "10000001b", "lastsend" : 1456586826, "lastrecv" : 1456586826, "bytessent" : 1178, "bytesrecv" : 1027, "conntime" : 1456585621, "version" : 60017, "subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/", "inbound" : true, "chainheight" : 82, "banscore" : 0 }, { "id" : 69, "addr" : "127.0.0.1:54008", "services" : "10000001b", "lastsend" : 1456586831, "lastrecv" : 1456586831, "bytessent" : 1123, "bytesrecv" : 1027, "conntime" : 1456585628, "version" : 60017, "subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/", "inbound" : true, "chainheight" : 82, "banscore" : 0 }, { "id" : 73, "addr" : "127.0.0.1:54242", "services" : "10000001b", "lastsend" : 1456586804, "lastrecv" : 1456586804, "bytessent" : 838, "bytesrecv" : 742, "conntime" : 1456586201, "version" : 60017, "subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/", "inbound" : true, "chainheight" : 82, "banscore" : 0 }, { "id" : 82, "addr" : "4i2wbx5kqzwbxqpk.onion:35914", "services" : "10000001b", "lastsend" : 1456586808, "lastrecv" : 1456586809, "bytessent" : 415, "bytesrecv" : 511, "conntime" : 1456586687, "version" : 60017, "subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/", "inbound" : false, "chainheight" : 82, "banscore" : 0 }, { "id" : 83, "addr" : "127.0.0.1:54524", "services" : "10000001b", "lastsend" : 1456586833, "lastrecv" : 1456586841, "bytessent" : 443, "bytesrecv" : 347, "conntime" : 1456586820, "version" : 60017, "subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/", "inbound" : true, "chainheight" : 82, "banscore" : 0 } ] Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward▲ Mine Now! Post by: jimlite on February 27, 2016, 03:32:54 PM No pool = total eclipse of my heart.
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward▲ Mine Now! Post by: Black Mamba on February 27, 2016, 03:49:22 PM No pool = total eclipse of my heart. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcOxhH8N3Bo :D Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on February 27, 2016, 04:51:43 PM Hi all, we are hoping a pool operator will decide to add EC soon to increase the ability for everyone to mine more easily.
Please continue to check back. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward▲ Mine Now! Post by: ocminer on February 27, 2016, 05:07:57 PM Hi all, we are hoping a pool operator will decide to add EC soon to increase the ability for everyone to mine more easily. Please continue to check back. You'd have a chance if your broken source on github would compile :) Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward▲ Mine Now! Post by: notsofast on February 27, 2016, 05:24:18 PM Hi all, we are hoping a pool operator will decide to add EC soon to increase the ability for everyone to mine more easily. Please continue to check back. You'd have a chance if your broken source on github would compile :) Eclipse is the 12-year-old Indian kid's coin, every time. Broken source, every time. Abandoned before a pool, every time. I should know, the few times I've bothered to mine I get about 75% of the coin supply before every other node leaves and the coin dies. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on February 27, 2016, 05:26:51 PM Hi all, we are hoping a pool operator will decide to add EC soon to increase the ability for everyone to mine more easily. Please continue to check back. You'd have a chance if your broken source on github would compile :) Eclipse is the 12-year-old Indian kid's coin, every time. Broken source, every time. Abandoned before a pool, every time. I should know, the few times I've bothered to mine I get about 75% of the coin supply before every other node leaves and the coin dies. I am not a 12 year old Indian kid and we are working on it. There have only been 105 blocks mined so please stop making assumptions. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward▲ Mine Now! Post by: stoner19 on February 27, 2016, 05:42:27 PM Hi all, we are hoping a pool operator will decide to add EC soon to increase the ability for everyone to mine more easily. Please continue to check back. You'd have a chance if your broken source on github would compile :) ocminer is right. The source is pretty jacked. Would like to see what you are planning on doing with this altcoin. Forget it...source is way jacked up and I see posts being deleted already. Not sure that I want to be involved. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on February 27, 2016, 05:59:23 PM Hi all, we are hoping a pool operator will decide to add EC soon to increase the ability for everyone to mine more easily. Please continue to check back. You'd have a chance if your broken source on github would compile :) ocminer is right. The source is pretty jacked. Would like to see what you are planning on doing with this altcoin. Forget it...source is way jacked up and I see posts being deleted already. Not sure that I want to be involved. The ONLY 2 posts that have been deleted were unnecessary insults, just so we're clear. We're working on this and will have an update out shortly. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward▲ Mine Now! Post by: stoner19 on February 27, 2016, 06:07:15 PM Hi all, we are hoping a pool operator will decide to add EC soon to increase the ability for everyone to mine more easily. Please continue to check back. You'd have a chance if your broken source on github would compile :) ocminer is right. The source is pretty jacked. Would like to see what you are planning on doing with this altcoin. Forget it...source is way jacked up and I see posts being deleted already. Not sure that I want to be involved. The ONLY 2 posts that have been deleted were unnecessary insults, just so we're clear. We're working on this and will have an update out shortly. Understood. Fix the source and I'll consider adding it again. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on February 27, 2016, 06:42:16 PM Hi all, we are hoping a pool operator will decide to add EC soon to increase the ability for everyone to mine more easily. Please continue to check back. You'd have a chance if your broken source on github would compile :) You realize this is not a clone coin so your personal build scripts will not work, don't you? Go check the source for new things ;) You will need to sudo apt-get install libevent-dev Then download and manually install libgmp to /usr/local (default). The latter is not our bug. libgmp has broken pkg-config. Complain to them. This is a consequence of using secp256k1. Then you have to use our makefile.unix. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: stoner19 on February 27, 2016, 07:44:27 PM it's up on superninjapool.tk (http://superninjapool.tk) now.
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on February 27, 2016, 08:02:07 PM it's up on ][Suspicious link removed] (http://[Suspicious link removed) now. There was something funky with validating the daemon address for pool payout. I imagine it has to do with stealth, but I think it's all set. Thanks for sticking with it! You won't regret it. ;) Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: stoner19 on February 27, 2016, 08:02:11 PM Eclipse Crypto, your account is too new so it's not going to allow you to post .tk URLs. you'll just have to put it up as "superninjapool (dot) tk" or something like that.
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on February 27, 2016, 08:49:59 PM Eclipse Crypto, your account is too new so it's not going to allow you to post .tk URLs. you'll just have to put it up as "superninjapool (dot) tk" or something like that. Thank you for getting the pool up and running. Here are easy instructions for everyone to mine EC on the superninjapool. 1. Download the Qt from the OP only! 2. Stratum Host: stratum+tcp://stratum. superninjapool .tk (remove spaces) 3. Ports: Port: 3490, Diff: 5120 Port: 3491, Diff: 20480 Port: 3492, Diff: 40960 4. Use your EC address as your User 5. Make up a random password 6. Enjoy Eclipse! Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: NextGenCrypto on February 27, 2016, 09:00:04 PM it's up on superninjapool.tk (http://superninjapool.tk) now. There was something funky with validating the daemon address for pool payout. I imagine it has to do with stealth, but I think it's all set. nice! got my miners running smooth. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Mohareb on February 27, 2016, 09:04:12 PM Wallets: Github (https://github.com/EclipseCrypto/eclipse) Windows Qt (http://www.mediafire.com/download/a1aiux29fzcu5ax/Eclipse-Qt-1.0.0.zip) The wallet size is high. anyone can check for virus or Trojan? Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: NextGenCrypto on February 27, 2016, 09:11:11 PM Wallets: The wallet size is high. anyone can check for virus or Trojan? its been checked: https://www.virustotal.com/id/url/46813d852b368bdc93971904eb6b89478392207133b9be50629cec810458d3d8/analysis/ clean Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on February 27, 2016, 09:14:23 PM Wallets: Github (https://github.com/EclipseCrypto/eclipse) Windows Qt (http://www.mediafire.com/download/a1aiux29fzcu5ax/Eclipse-Qt-1.0.0.zip) The wallet size is high. anyone can check for virus or Trojan? Someone already beat me to it: 0/55 for Eclipse Qt-v1.0.0.zip https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/a9abc98b1dbc903abfad7df819291f4d85df96152f2fe316f363d47b054b6623/analysis/ Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on February 27, 2016, 09:23:57 PM Wallets: Github (https://github.com/EclipseCrypto/eclipse) Windows Qt (http://www.mediafire.com/download/a1aiux29fzcu5ax/Eclipse-Qt-1.0.0.zip) The wallet size is high. anyone can check for virus or Trojan? its been checked: https://www.virustotal.com/id/url/46813d852b368bdc93971904eb6b89478392207133b9be50629cec810458d3d8/analysis/ clean That's a site scan. I scanned the actual zip archive, which is clean too. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: BleedCrypto on February 27, 2016, 11:18:20 PM whats the point of this coin?
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Belligerent Fool on February 27, 2016, 11:40:04 PM Even when trying to solo mine I get coinbase error mismatch, DOA.... ocminer was right.
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: BleedCrypto on February 27, 2016, 11:50:34 PM Even when trying to solo mine I get coinbase error mismatch, DOA.... ocminer was right. youre right move along nothing to see here. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: chrisvl on February 28, 2016, 12:28:49 AM can someone tell me where is the problem ?
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on February 28, 2016, 01:29:31 AM can someone tell me where is the problem ? What do you mean problem? There is no problem. Run it a second time. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: chrisvl on February 28, 2016, 01:35:21 AM can someone tell me where is the problem ? What do you mean problem? There is no problem. Run it a second time. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on February 28, 2016, 02:05:30 AM Dear everyone trying to build the wallet:
Golden rule, don't make assumptions about how your build environment relates to building this coin. Use our makefile. Follow its spirit and letter. Second rule, we included our own secp256k1 for a reason. It is custom. You can't use your own. Link to ours. Look at the make file for how it is built. Secp256k1 is designed as an external dependency, so we had to make our custom one quasi-external. Build it according to our recipe and make sure it installs to secp256k1/lib and secp256k1/include in the source tree. This was the most straightforward way to do it without forking secp256k1 and calling it something else, etc. Third rule, manually build and install libgmp to the default location /usr/local. The need to do this is a known issue with libgmp. For some reason known only to some mystics, the libgmp pkg-config is broken from the factory. This is not our bug. Complain to them. libgmp is necessary for secp256k1. Any secp256k1. Fourth rule, install libevent-dev if you are using debian/ubuntu. Fifth rule, if you have a problem, don't be coy. Just PM us with the build error or post it here. Golden rule restated: It's not just another clone, so don't try to build it like it is. And anyway, who wants to mine just another clone? Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on February 28, 2016, 06:40:42 AM whats the point of this coin? It bleeds crypto. ;) Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: cvhmine on February 28, 2016, 07:03:08 AM (imagine an image of an eclipse here) Eclipse Specifications: Ticker: EC Algorithm: SHA-256d PoW/PoS with Independent Targeting PoW Block Time: 256 seconds (4 minutes) Max PoW Mining Supply: 2.78 Million (last block 4725) PoW Reward: 4027 EC halving every 337.5 blocks PoS V2 PoS Min Age: 8 hours HiPoS Length: 4 Weeks HiPoS Reward: 300 Corona, decreasing by 10/day to 20 Corona Post-HiPoS Reward: 10 Corona Port: 35914 (testnet: 35915) RPC Port: 45914 (testnet: 45915) Additional information coming soon. In the meantime, please enjoy PoW mining. Wallets: Github (https://github.com/EclipseCrypto/eclipse) Windows Qt (http://www.mediafire.com/download/a1aiux29fzcu5ax/Eclipse-Qt-1.0.0.zip) Mining Pools: superninjapool . tk Additional Links: EclipseCrypto.com (http://www.eclipsecrypto.com) Twitter.com/EclipseCrypto (http://www.twitter.com/eclipsecrypto) Look good! I've started mining at 400 MH/s at my peak. I got a cheap USB ASIC Miner! I trust in this coin. I will mine it day and night. I don't think it will fail. I like the stealth address thing. Makes it good for anonymity. Haven't seen it in any other wallet. My address is EMuZir44YAkCCHS6TFEn5oUwaLyKgESzyh and I trust in this coin. As I said before, I'm going to keep mining this coin. Long live Eclipse! Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: voteformeg on February 28, 2016, 09:15:17 AM superninjapool.tk works? , because i do not see any coin in my wallet and pool keep saying 33 blocks pending and 66 blocks confirmed
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on February 28, 2016, 09:19:23 AM [Suspicious link removed] works? , because i do not see any coin in my wallet and pool keep saying 33 blocks pending and 66 blocks confirmed Maturity is 120 blocks. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: voteformeg on February 28, 2016, 10:04:28 AM [Suspicious link removed] works? , because i do not see any coin in my wallet and pool keep saying 33 blocks pending and 66 blocks confirmed Maturity is 120 blocks. tanx for answer , nice wallet btw. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: ocminer on February 28, 2016, 10:13:25 AM This thing is still failling to compile for me:
./configure: line 12320: SECP_64BIT_ASM_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12349: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12377: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12402: SECP_GMP_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12508: SECP_OPENSSL_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12526: AX_JNI_INCLUDE_DIR: command not found Seems that secp is somehow broken, I downloaded with --recursive already and manually tried to compile secp first - no luck. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: voteformeg on February 28, 2016, 10:44:09 AM This thing is still failling to compile for me: ./configure: line 12320: SECP_64BIT_ASM_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12349: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12377: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12402: SECP_GMP_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12508: SECP_OPENSSL_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12526: AX_JNI_INCLUDE_DIR: command not found Seems that secp is somehow broken, I downloaded with --recursive already and manually tried to compile secp first - no luck. hhmmm , i hope they pm'ed you with a solution , i am waiting for a suprnovapool so i can see what i have mined Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: voteformeg on February 28, 2016, 04:50:23 PM anyway , recieving amounts now in my wallet
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on February 28, 2016, 07:16:56 PM This thing is still failling to compile for me: ./configure: line 12320: SECP_64BIT_ASM_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12349: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12377: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12402: SECP_GMP_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12508: SECP_OPENSSL_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12526: AX_JNI_INCLUDE_DIR: command not found Seems that secp is somehow broken, I downloaded with --recursive already and manually tried to compile secp first - no luck. Did you manually compile the secp256k library that we included in the repository? Also, just for clarifications, can you provide autoconf and automake versions? Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: ocminer on February 28, 2016, 07:35:35 PM This thing is still failling to compile for me: ./configure: line 12320: SECP_64BIT_ASM_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12349: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12377: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12402: SECP_GMP_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12508: SECP_OPENSSL_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12526: AX_JNI_INCLUDE_DIR: command not found Seems that secp is somehow broken, I downloaded with --recursive already and manually tried to compile secp first - no luck. Did you manually compile the secp256k library that we included in the repository? Also, just for clarifications, can you provide autoconf and automake versions? I tried both, manually and just automatic through your makefile. autoconf --version autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.69 automake --version automake (GNU automake) 1.15 Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: chrisvl on February 28, 2016, 07:51:14 PM This thing is still failling to compile for me: ./configure: line 12320: SECP_64BIT_ASM_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12349: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12377: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12402: SECP_GMP_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12508: SECP_OPENSSL_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12526: AX_JNI_INCLUDE_DIR: command not found Seems that secp is somehow broken, I downloaded with --recursive already and manually tried to compile secp first - no luck. Did you manually compile the secp256k library that we included in the repository? Also, just for clarifications, can you provide autoconf and automake versions? I tried both, manually and just automatic through your makefile. autoconf --version autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.69 automake --version automake (GNU automake) 1.15 Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: ocminer on February 28, 2016, 08:05:18 PM This thing is still failling to compile for me: ./configure: line 12320: SECP_64BIT_ASM_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12349: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12377: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12402: SECP_GMP_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12508: SECP_OPENSSL_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12526: AX_JNI_INCLUDE_DIR: command not found Seems that secp is somehow broken, I downloaded with --recursive already and manually tried to compile secp first - no luck. Did you manually compile the secp256k library that we included in the repository? Also, just for clarifications, can you provide autoconf and automake versions? I tried both, manually and just automatic through your makefile. autoconf --version autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.69 automake --version automake (GNU automake) 1.15 So what were your steps to do so ? Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on February 28, 2016, 08:35:15 PM This thing is still failling to compile for me: ./configure: line 12320: SECP_64BIT_ASM_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12349: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12377: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12402: SECP_GMP_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12508: SECP_OPENSSL_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12526: AX_JNI_INCLUDE_DIR: command not found Seems that secp is somehow broken, I downloaded with --recursive already and manually tried to compile secp first - no luck. Secp is not broken itself. The autoconf includes are. This is indeed a bug with the build scripts. It looks like we tested fresh builds from the private repo at bitbucket, but somehow the repository did not fully transfer correctly to github, where we did a fresh git init. We are making and testing a repo fix now. It really would have been better for someone to post the error message sooner. We can't test under every possible condition, and testing does not always find the bugs. It's obvious in hindsight that we should have done build testing from the public repo. We did many build tests from the private. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: chrisvl on February 28, 2016, 08:39:07 PM This thing is still failling to compile for me: ./configure: line 12320: SECP_64BIT_ASM_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12349: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12377: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12402: SECP_GMP_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12508: SECP_OPENSSL_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12526: AX_JNI_INCLUDE_DIR: command not found Seems that secp is somehow broken, I downloaded with --recursive already and manually tried to compile secp first - no luck. Did you manually compile the secp256k library that we included in the repository? Also, just for clarifications, can you provide autoconf and automake versions? I tried both, manually and just automatic through your makefile. autoconf --version autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.69 automake --version automake (GNU automake) 1.15 So what were your steps to do so ? replace the secp256k1 folder with bitcoin secp256k1 folder on makefile.unix remove the line 274 make -f makefile.unix Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: chrisvl on February 28, 2016, 08:40:45 PM dev send me 2 coins ERocMVnN9VdMvWiJbvgtWo9pLM9qJFt2Ue to check if eclipsed working correctly
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Maicol792 on February 28, 2016, 08:42:33 PM dev we can merge Eclipse whit BitcoinUltra (BTCU)?
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: ocminer on February 28, 2016, 08:44:32 PM This thing is still failling to compile for me: ./configure: line 12320: SECP_64BIT_ASM_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12349: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12377: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12402: SECP_GMP_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12508: SECP_OPENSSL_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12526: AX_JNI_INCLUDE_DIR: command not found Seems that secp is somehow broken, I downloaded with --recursive already and manually tried to compile secp first - no luck. Did you manually compile the secp256k library that we included in the repository? Also, just for clarifications, can you provide autoconf and automake versions? I tried both, manually and just automatic through your makefile. autoconf --version autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.69 automake --version automake (GNU automake) 1.15 So what were your steps to do so ? replace the secp256k1 folder with bitcoin secp256k1 folder on makefile.unix remove the line 274 make -f makefile.unix I was thinking about replacing the secp with bitcoin's secp but the dev states it's a special version with some mods.. so it would make no sense if that's actually working :) Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: chrisvl on February 28, 2016, 08:48:10 PM This thing is still failling to compile for me: ./configure: line 12320: SECP_64BIT_ASM_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12349: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12377: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12402: SECP_GMP_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12508: SECP_OPENSSL_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12526: AX_JNI_INCLUDE_DIR: command not found Seems that secp is somehow broken, I downloaded with --recursive already and manually tried to compile secp first - no luck. Did you manually compile the secp256k library that we included in the repository? Also, just for clarifications, can you provide autoconf and automake versions? I tried both, manually and just automatic through your makefile. autoconf --version autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.69 automake --version automake (GNU automake) 1.15 So what were your steps to do so ? replace the secp256k1 folder with bitcoin secp256k1 folder on makefile.unix remove the line 274 make -f makefile.unix I was thinking about replacing the secp with bitcoin's secp but the dev states it's a special version with some mods.. so it would make no sense if that's actually working :) { "version" : "v1.0.0.0-g", "mode" : "full", "state" : "Full Node", "protocolversion" : 60017, "walletversion" : 10500, "balance" : 0.00000000, "eclipsebalance" : 0.00000000, "newmint" : 0.00000000, "stake" : 0.00000000, "reserve" : 0.00000000, "blocks" : 739, "timeoffset" : -2, "moneysupply" : 1275959.00550400, "connections" : 10, "datareceived" : "111.24 KB", "datasent" : "60.44 KB", "proxy" : "", "ip" : "iebbi7wttlv5rdfg.onion", "difficulty" : { "proof-of-work" : 16337219.17622585, "proof-of-stake" : 128405.33843578 }, "testnet" : false, "keypoolsize" : 101, "paytxfee" : 0.00020000, "mininput" : 0.00000000, "errors" : "" } Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: DeCrypterManiac on February 28, 2016, 08:48:13 PM This thing is still failling to compile for me: ./configure: line 12320: SECP_64BIT_ASM_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12349: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12377: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12402: SECP_GMP_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12508: SECP_OPENSSL_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12526: AX_JNI_INCLUDE_DIR: command not found Seems that secp is somehow broken, I downloaded with --recursive already and manually tried to compile secp first - no luck. Secp is not broken itself. The autoconf includes are. This is indeed a bug with the build scripts. It looks like we tested fresh builds from the private repo at bitbucket, but somehow the repository did not fully transfer correctly to github, where we did a fresh git init. We are making and testing a repo fix now. It really would have been better for someone to post the error message sooner. We can't test under every possible condition, and testing does not always find the bugs. It's obvious in hindsight that we should have done build testing from the public repo. We did many build tests from the private. So there was no (working) source available since launch and you could mine all the blocks yourself until you release the working version.. nice.. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: voteformeg on February 28, 2016, 08:49:52 PM dev send me 2 coins ERocMVnN9VdMvWiJbvgtWo9pLM9qJFt2Ue to check if eclipsed working correctly send Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Bank_sy on February 28, 2016, 08:50:50 PM This thing is still failling to compile for me: ./configure: line 12320: SECP_64BIT_ASM_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12349: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12377: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12402: SECP_GMP_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12508: SECP_OPENSSL_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12526: AX_JNI_INCLUDE_DIR: command not found Seems that secp is somehow broken, I downloaded with --recursive already and manually tried to compile secp first - no luck. Secp is not broken itself. The autoconf includes are. This is indeed a bug with the build scripts. It looks like we tested fresh builds from the private repo at bitbucket, but somehow the repository did not fully transfer correctly to github, where we did a fresh git init. We are making and testing a repo fix now. It really would have been better for someone to post the error message sooner. We can't test under every possible condition, and testing does not always find the bugs. It's obvious in hindsight that we should have done build testing from the public repo. We did many build tests from the private. So there was no (working) source available since launch and you could mine all the blocks yourself until you release the working version.. nice.. There has been pool for some time now it's up on superninjapool.tk (http://superninjapool.tk) now. There was something funky with validating the daemon address for pool payout. I imagine it has to do with stealth, but I think it's all set. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: ocminer on February 28, 2016, 08:51:07 PM This thing is still failling to compile for me: ./configure: line 12320: SECP_64BIT_ASM_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12349: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12377: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12402: SECP_GMP_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12508: SECP_OPENSSL_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12526: AX_JNI_INCLUDE_DIR: command not found Seems that secp is somehow broken, I downloaded with --recursive already and manually tried to compile secp first - no luck. Did you manually compile the secp256k library that we included in the repository? Also, just for clarifications, can you provide autoconf and automake versions? I tried both, manually and just automatic through your makefile. autoconf --version autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.69 automake --version automake (GNU automake) 1.15 So what were your steps to do so ? replace the secp256k1 folder with bitcoin secp256k1 folder on makefile.unix remove the line 274 make -f makefile.unix I was thinking about replacing the secp with bitcoin's secp but the dev states it's a special version with some mods.. so it would make no sense if that's actually working :) { "version" : "v1.0.0.0-g", "mode" : "full", "state" : "Full Node", "protocolversion" : 60017, "walletversion" : 10500, "balance" : 0.00000000, "eclipsebalance" : 0.00000000, "newmint" : 0.00000000, "stake" : 0.00000000, "reserve" : 0.00000000, "blocks" : 739, "timeoffset" : -2, "moneysupply" : 1275959.00550400, "connections" : 10, "datareceived" : "111.24 KB", "datasent" : "60.44 KB", "proxy" : "", "ip" : "iebbi7wttlv5rdfg.onion", "difficulty" : { "proof-of-work" : 16337219.17622585, "proof-of-stake" : 128405.33843578 }, "testnet" : false, "keypoolsize" : 101, "paytxfee" : 0.00020000, "mininput" : 0.00000000, "errors" : "" } Hmm interesting.. Than the secp is NOT special and just a normal version... Which version/revision of secp did you use, I just tried with the latest version from the secp github but it looks like it is too new, its getting some unresolved symbols. Already that money supply at block height ? wow... Serious doubt if it makes any sense to still add this coin... Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: DeCrypterManiac on February 28, 2016, 08:51:39 PM This thing is still failling to compile for me: ./configure: line 12320: SECP_64BIT_ASM_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12349: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12377: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12402: SECP_GMP_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12508: SECP_OPENSSL_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12526: AX_JNI_INCLUDE_DIR: command not found Seems that secp is somehow broken, I downloaded with --recursive already and manually tried to compile secp first - no luck. Secp is not broken itself. The autoconf includes are. This is indeed a bug with the build scripts. It looks like we tested fresh builds from the private repo at bitbucket, but somehow the repository did not fully transfer correctly to github, where we did a fresh git init. We are making and testing a repo fix now. It really would have been better for someone to post the error message sooner. We can't test under every possible condition, and testing does not always find the bugs. It's obvious in hindsight that we should have done build testing from the public repo. We did many build tests from the private. So there was no (working) source available since launch and you could mine all the blocks yourself until you release the working version.. nice.. There has been pool for some time now it's up on superninjapool.tk (http://superninjapool.tk) now. There was something funky with validating the daemon address for pool payout. I imagine it has to do with stealth, but I think it's all set. Yes, but the source was broken on github... Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: chrisvl on February 28, 2016, 08:57:42 PM This thing is still failling to compile for me: ./configure: line 12320: SECP_64BIT_ASM_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12349: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12377: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12402: SECP_GMP_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12508: SECP_OPENSSL_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12526: AX_JNI_INCLUDE_DIR: command not found Seems that secp is somehow broken, I downloaded with --recursive already and manually tried to compile secp first - no luck. Did you manually compile the secp256k library that we included in the repository? Also, just for clarifications, can you provide autoconf and automake versions? I tried both, manually and just automatic through your makefile. autoconf --version autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.69 automake --version automake (GNU automake) 1.15 So what were your steps to do so ? replace the secp256k1 folder with bitcoin secp256k1 folder on makefile.unix remove the line 274 make -f makefile.unix I was thinking about replacing the secp with bitcoin's secp but the dev states it's a special version with some mods.. so it would make no sense if that's actually working :) { "version" : "v1.0.0.0-g", "mode" : "full", "state" : "Full Node", "protocolversion" : 60017, "walletversion" : 10500, "balance" : 0.00000000, "eclipsebalance" : 0.00000000, "newmint" : 0.00000000, "stake" : 0.00000000, "reserve" : 0.00000000, "blocks" : 739, "timeoffset" : -2, "moneysupply" : 1275959.00550400, "connections" : 10, "datareceived" : "111.24 KB", "datasent" : "60.44 KB", "proxy" : "", "ip" : "iebbi7wttlv5rdfg.onion", "difficulty" : { "proof-of-work" : 16337219.17622585, "proof-of-stake" : 128405.33843578 }, "testnet" : false, "keypoolsize" : 101, "paytxfee" : 0.00020000, "mininput" : 0.00000000, "errors" : "" } Hmm interesting.. Than the secp is NOT special and just a normal version... Which version/revision of secp did you use, I just tried with the latest version from the secp github but it looks like it is too new, its getting some unresolved symbols. Already that money supply at block height ? wow... Serious doubt if it makes any sense to still add this coin... Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: chrisvl on February 28, 2016, 08:58:38 PM dev send me 2 coins ERocMVnN9VdMvWiJbvgtWo9pLM9qJFt2Ue to check if eclipsed working correctly send Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: ocminer on February 28, 2016, 09:08:40 PM This thing is still failling to compile for me: ./configure: line 12320: SECP_64BIT_ASM_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12349: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12377: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12402: SECP_GMP_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12508: SECP_OPENSSL_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12526: AX_JNI_INCLUDE_DIR: command not found Seems that secp is somehow broken, I downloaded with --recursive already and manually tried to compile secp first - no luck. Did you manually compile the secp256k library that we included in the repository? Also, just for clarifications, can you provide autoconf and automake versions? I tried both, manually and just automatic through your makefile. autoconf --version autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.69 automake --version automake (GNU automake) 1.15 So what were your steps to do so ? replace the secp256k1 folder with bitcoin secp256k1 folder on makefile.unix remove the line 274 make -f makefile.unix I was thinking about replacing the secp with bitcoin's secp but the dev states it's a special version with some mods.. so it would make no sense if that's actually working :) { "version" : "v1.0.0.0-g", "mode" : "full", "state" : "Full Node", "protocolversion" : 60017, "walletversion" : 10500, "balance" : 0.00000000, "eclipsebalance" : 0.00000000, "newmint" : 0.00000000, "stake" : 0.00000000, "reserve" : 0.00000000, "blocks" : 739, "timeoffset" : -2, "moneysupply" : 1275959.00550400, "connections" : 10, "datareceived" : "111.24 KB", "datasent" : "60.44 KB", "proxy" : "", "ip" : "iebbi7wttlv5rdfg.onion", "difficulty" : { "proof-of-work" : 16337219.17622585, "proof-of-stake" : 128405.33843578 }, "testnet" : false, "keypoolsize" : 101, "paytxfee" : 0.00020000, "mininput" : 0.00000000, "errors" : "" } Hmm interesting.. Than the secp is NOT special and just a normal version... Which version/revision of secp did you use, I just tried with the latest version from the secp github but it looks like it is too new, its getting some unresolved symbols. Already that money supply at block height ? wow... Serious doubt if it makes any sense to still add this coin... Yup, the standard bitcoin secp does it.. So whats the story about the "special version" ? :) If I would have known its the standard bitcoin version... Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: chrisvl on February 28, 2016, 09:12:21 PM After secp problem solving i fetch a error
sigringu.cpp: In function ‘int hashToEC(const uint8_t*, uint32_t, BIGNUM*, EC_POINT*)’: sigringu.cpp:150:60: error: ‘secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes’ was not declared in this scope if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash)) ^ make: *** [obj/sigringu.o] Error 1 i remove the line 150-151 from sigringu.cpp and then make -f makefile.unix Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: ocminer on February 28, 2016, 09:14:22 PM After secp problem solving i fetch a error sigringu.cpp: In function ‘int hashToEC(const uint8_t*, uint32_t, BIGNUM*, EC_POINT*)’: sigringu.cpp:150:60: error: ‘secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes’ was not declared in this scope if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash)) ^ make: *** [obj/sigringu.o] Error 1 i remove the line 150-151 from sigringu.cpp and then make -f makefile.unix Yeah but this cannot work, you're just removing that function from the source.. If the source/binary ever needs this function it will fail Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: chrisvl on February 28, 2016, 09:15:07 PM This thing is still failling to compile for me: ./configure: line 12320: SECP_64BIT_ASM_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12349: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12377: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12402: SECP_GMP_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12508: SECP_OPENSSL_CHECK: command not found ./configure: line 12526: AX_JNI_INCLUDE_DIR: command not found Seems that secp is somehow broken, I downloaded with --recursive already and manually tried to compile secp first - no luck. Did you manually compile the secp256k library that we included in the repository? Also, just for clarifications, can you provide autoconf and automake versions? I tried both, manually and just automatic through your makefile. autoconf --version autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.69 automake --version automake (GNU automake) 1.15 So what were your steps to do so ? replace the secp256k1 folder with bitcoin secp256k1 folder on makefile.unix remove the line 274 make -f makefile.unix I was thinking about replacing the secp with bitcoin's secp but the dev states it's a special version with some mods.. so it would make no sense if that's actually working :) { "version" : "v1.0.0.0-g", "mode" : "full", "state" : "Full Node", "protocolversion" : 60017, "walletversion" : 10500, "balance" : 0.00000000, "eclipsebalance" : 0.00000000, "newmint" : 0.00000000, "stake" : 0.00000000, "reserve" : 0.00000000, "blocks" : 739, "timeoffset" : -2, "moneysupply" : 1275959.00550400, "connections" : 10, "datareceived" : "111.24 KB", "datasent" : "60.44 KB", "proxy" : "", "ip" : "iebbi7wttlv5rdfg.onion", "difficulty" : { "proof-of-work" : 16337219.17622585, "proof-of-stake" : 128405.33843578 }, "testnet" : false, "keypoolsize" : 101, "paytxfee" : 0.00020000, "mininput" : 0.00000000, "errors" : "" } Hmm interesting.. Than the secp is NOT special and just a normal version... Which version/revision of secp did you use, I just tried with the latest version from the secp github but it looks like it is too new, its getting some unresolved symbols. Already that money supply at block height ? wow... Serious doubt if it makes any sense to still add this coin... Yup, the standard bitcoin secp does it.. So whats the story about the "special version" ? :) If I would have known its the standard bitcoin version... Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: chrisvl on February 28, 2016, 09:16:21 PM After secp problem solving i fetch a error sigringu.cpp: In function ‘int hashToEC(const uint8_t*, uint32_t, BIGNUM*, EC_POINT*)’: sigringu.cpp:150:60: error: ‘secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes’ was not declared in this scope if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash)) ^ make: *** [obj/sigringu.o] Error 1 i remove the line 150-151 from sigringu.cpp and then make -f makefile.unix Yeah but this cannot work, you're just removing that function from the source.. If the source/binary ever needs this function it will fail Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: ocminer on February 28, 2016, 09:18:30 PM After secp problem solving i fetch a error sigringu.cpp: In function ‘int hashToEC(const uint8_t*, uint32_t, BIGNUM*, EC_POINT*)’: sigringu.cpp:150:60: error: ‘secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes’ was not declared in this scope if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash)) ^ make: *** [obj/sigringu.o] Error 1 i remove the line 150-151 from sigringu.cpp and then make -f makefile.unix Yeah but this cannot work, you're just removing that function from the source.. If the source/binary ever needs this function it will fail Yeah cheers and thanks for your help, you've helped a lot more than the dev actually :) Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on February 28, 2016, 09:19:47 PM After secp problem solving i fetch a error sigringu.cpp: In function ‘int hashToEC(const uint8_t*, uint32_t, BIGNUM*, EC_POINT*)’: sigringu.cpp:150:60: error: ‘secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes’ was not declared in this scope if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash)) ^ make: *** [obj/sigringu.o] Error 1 i remove the line 150-151 from sigringu.cpp and then make -f makefile.unix Yeah but this cannot work, you're just removing that function from the source.. If the source/binary ever needs this function it will fail Yeah cheers and thanks for your help, you've helped a lot more than the dev actually :) Post an error message next time. If you wait until literally Sunday morning to post a helpful error message, do you think you are going to get help immediately? Legit devs have legit lives. You had all weekend to post an error message. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Panadacoin on February 28, 2016, 09:22:06 PM After secp problem solving i fetch a error sigringu.cpp: In function ‘int hashToEC(const uint8_t*, uint32_t, BIGNUM*, EC_POINT*)’: sigringu.cpp:150:60: error: ‘secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes’ was not declared in this scope if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash)) ^ make: *** [obj/sigringu.o] Error 1 i remove the line 150-151 from sigringu.cpp and then make -f makefile.unix Yeah but this cannot work, you're just removing that function from the source.. If the source/binary ever needs this function it will fail Yeah cheers and thanks for your help, you've helped a lot more than the dev actually :) Post an error message next time. If you wait until literally Sunday morning to post a helpful error message, do you think you are going to get help? You had all weekend to post an error message. You really come across as quite the dick. Keep your shitcoin fuckboy. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: chrisvl on February 28, 2016, 09:24:14 PM After secp problem solving i fetch a error sigringu.cpp: In function ‘int hashToEC(const uint8_t*, uint32_t, BIGNUM*, EC_POINT*)’: sigringu.cpp:150:60: error: ‘secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes’ was not declared in this scope if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash)) ^ make: *** [obj/sigringu.o] Error 1 i remove the line 150-151 from sigringu.cpp and then make -f makefile.unix Yeah but this cannot work, you're just removing that function from the source.. If the source/binary ever needs this function it will fail Yeah cheers and thanks for your help, you've helped a lot more than the dev actually :) Post an error message next time. If you wait until literally Sunday morning to post a helpful error message, do you think you are going to get help immediately? Legit devs have legit lives. You had all weekend to post an error message. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: ocminer on February 28, 2016, 09:24:34 PM After secp problem solving i fetch a error sigringu.cpp: In function ‘int hashToEC(const uint8_t*, uint32_t, BIGNUM*, EC_POINT*)’: sigringu.cpp:150:60: error: ‘secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes’ was not declared in this scope if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash)) ^ make: *** [obj/sigringu.o] Error 1 i remove the line 150-151 from sigringu.cpp and then make -f makefile.unix Yeah but this cannot work, you're just removing that function from the source.. If the source/binary ever needs this function it will fail Yeah cheers and thanks for your help, you've helped a lot more than the dev actually :) Post an error message next time. If you wait until literally Sunday morning to post a helpful error message, do you think you are going to get help immediately? Legit devs have legit lives. You had all weekend to post an error message. You had all time since launch to get your repo cloned onto a vm/vps and do a simple test compile there. It's not my job getting bugs/flaws ironed out you implement or do testing which you didn't ;) Nevertheless with all the love in this thread and your attitude, good luck with this project. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: chrisvl on February 28, 2016, 09:26:36 PM dev this lines is required
if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash)) return 1; ? Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on February 28, 2016, 09:28:22 PM After secp problem solving i fetch a error sigringu.cpp: In function ‘int hashToEC(const uint8_t*, uint32_t, BIGNUM*, EC_POINT*)’: sigringu.cpp:150:60: error: ‘secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes’ was not declared in this scope if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash)) ^ make: *** [obj/sigringu.o] Error 1 i remove the line 150-151 from sigringu.cpp and then make -f makefile.unix Yeah but this cannot work, you're just removing that function from the source.. If the source/binary ever needs this function it will fail Yeah cheers and thanks for your help, you've helped a lot more than the dev actually :) Post an error message next time. If you wait until literally Sunday morning to post a helpful error message, do you think you are going to get help? You had all weekend to post an error message. You really come across as quite the dick. Keep your shitcoin fuckboy. It's a 2 way street. If there is a problem post an error message. We don't know what is happening in your computer screen. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: chrisvl on February 28, 2016, 09:31:01 PM After secp problem solving i fetch a error sigringu.cpp: In function ‘int hashToEC(const uint8_t*, uint32_t, BIGNUM*, EC_POINT*)’: sigringu.cpp:150:60: error: ‘secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes’ was not declared in this scope if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash)) ^ make: *** [obj/sigringu.o] Error 1 i remove the line 150-151 from sigringu.cpp and then make -f makefile.unix Yeah but this cannot work, you're just removing that function from the source.. If the source/binary ever needs this function it will fail Yeah cheers and thanks for your help, you've helped a lot more than the dev actually :) Post an error message next time. If you wait until literally Sunday morning to post a helpful error message, do you think you are going to get help immediately? Legit devs have legit lives. You had all weekend to post an error message. You had all time since launch to get your repo cloned onto a vm/vps and do a simple test compile there. It's not my job getting bugs/flaws ironed out you implement or do testing which you didn't ;) Nevertheless with all the love in this thread and your attitude, good luck with this project. also ask where is the problem https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378922.msg14033384#msg14033384 and i dont get a answer the like problem is on secp and i ignore it you answer What do you mean problem? There is no problem. Run it a second time. if you have answer we have problem on secp e.g i had the solution from yesterday Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on February 28, 2016, 09:43:36 PM After secp problem solving i fetch a error sigringu.cpp: In function ‘int hashToEC(const uint8_t*, uint32_t, BIGNUM*, EC_POINT*)’: sigringu.cpp:150:60: error: ‘secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes’ was not declared in this scope if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash)) ^ make: *** [obj/sigringu.o] Error 1 i remove the line 150-151 from sigringu.cpp and then make -f makefile.unix Yeah but this cannot work, you're just removing that function from the source.. If the source/binary ever needs this function it will fail Yeah cheers and thanks for your help, you've helped a lot more than the dev actually :) Post an error message next time. If you wait until literally Sunday morning to post a helpful error message, do you think you are going to get help immediately? Legit devs have legit lives. You had all weekend to post an error message. You had all time since launch to get your repo cloned onto a vm/vps and do a simple test compile there. It's not my job getting bugs/flaws ironed out you implement or do testing which you didn't ;) Nevertheless with all the love in this thread and your attitude, good luck with this project. also ask where is the problem https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378922.msg14033384#msg14033384 and i dont get a answer the like problem is on secp and i ignore it you answer What do you mean problem? There is no problem. Run it a second time. if you have answer we have problem on secp e.g i had the solution from yesterday Your question was "can someone tell me where is the problem". Describe the problem. No one can read your mind. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Anoona on February 28, 2016, 09:49:43 PM I have errors during the compilation
Code: src/init.h:10:21: fatal error: eclipse.h: The file or directory does not exist Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on February 28, 2016, 09:50:36 PM dev this lines is required if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash)) return 1; ? Yes, it takes a 32 byte big endian scalar hash and returns two 32 byte big endian scalars that describe a point on the eliptic curve secp256k1. ;) Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: chrisvl on February 28, 2016, 09:53:36 PM dev this lines is required if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash)) return 1; ? Yes, it takes a 32 byte big endian scalar hash and returns two 32 byte big endian scalars that describe a point on the eliptic curve secp256k1. ;) Code: sigringu.cpp: In function ‘int hashToEC(const uint8_t*, uint32_t, BIGNUM*, EC_POINT*)’: Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: ocminer on February 28, 2016, 10:00:34 PM dev this lines is required if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash)) return 1; ? Yes, it takes a 32 byte big endian scalar hash and returns two 32 byte big endian scalars that describe a point on the eliptic curve secp256k1. ;) Code: sigringu.cpp: In function ‘int hashToEC(const uint8_t*, uint32_t, BIGNUM*, EC_POINT*)’: Nope, error is still there :) Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: chrisvl on February 28, 2016, 10:04:39 PM dev this lines is required if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash)) return 1; ? Yes, it takes a 32 byte big endian scalar hash and returns two 32 byte big endian scalars that describe a point on the eliptic curve secp256k1. ;) Code: sigringu.cpp: In function ‘int hashToEC(const uint8_t*, uint32_t, BIGNUM*, EC_POINT*)’: Nope, error is still there :) also if we remove the lines 150-151 on sigringu.cpp its compiled success.. if the lines 150-151 is required dev how we can solve the problem without removing the lines 150-151 ? Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: glen123 on February 28, 2016, 10:05:14 PM dev this lines is required if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash)) return 1; ? Yes, it takes a 32 byte big endian scalar hash and returns two 32 byte big endian scalars that describe a point on the eliptic curve secp256k1. ;) Code: sigringu.cpp: In function ‘int hashToEC(const uint8_t*, uint32_t, BIGNUM*, EC_POINT*)’: Nope, error is still there :) @Oc: lohnt nicht sich darüber aufzuregen . es ist immer noch eine "Bringschuld" des Devs eine funktionierende Source zu stellen . Und da er das nicht im Griff hat , so what :-) Gruss Glen Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: chrisvl on February 28, 2016, 10:08:16 PM dev this lines is required if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash)) return 1; ? Yes, it takes a 32 byte big endian scalar hash and returns two 32 byte big endian scalars that describe a point on the eliptic curve secp256k1. ;) Code: sigringu.cpp: In function ‘int hashToEC(const uint8_t*, uint32_t, BIGNUM*, EC_POINT*)’: Nope, error is still there :) @Oc: lohnt nicht sich darüber aufzuregen . es ist immer noch eine "Bringschuld" des Devs eine funktionierende Source zu stellen . Und da er das nicht im Griff hat , so what :-) Gruss Glen Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: glen123 on February 28, 2016, 10:12:42 PM nur wenn wir halt eigenmächtig in der src rumeditieren wird evtl mehr zerschossen als jemanden lieb ist .
Und wie oben zu lesen war es ja keine "special" Version von Secp Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on February 28, 2016, 10:21:21 PM dev this lines is required if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash)) return 1; ? Yes, it takes a 32 byte big endian scalar hash and returns two 32 byte big endian scalars that describe a point on the eliptic curve secp256k1. ;) Code: sigringu.cpp: In function ‘int hashToEC(const uint8_t*, uint32_t, BIGNUM*, EC_POINT*)’: BUILD FIX IS IN 1. Delete your existing eclipse directory just to be sure. 2. Clone the repo. 3. make -f makefile.unix Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on February 28, 2016, 10:27:45 PM dev this lines is required if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash)) return 1; ? Yes, it takes a 32 byte big endian scalar hash and returns two 32 byte big endian scalars that describe a point on the eliptic curve secp256k1. ;) Code: sigringu.cpp: In function ‘int hashToEC(const uint8_t*, uint32_t, BIGNUM*, EC_POINT*)’: No, that commit was not the final for this fix. The final for the fix is https://github.com/EclipseCrypto/eclipse/commit/0b1593e2a443ae24a763be7eeef2ab5d74da7d7b Follow these instructions: BUILD FIX IS IN 1. Delete your existing eclipse directory just to be sure. 2. Clone the repo. 3. make -f makefile.unix Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on February 28, 2016, 10:42:13 PM dev this lines is required if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash)) return 1; ? Yes, it takes a 32 byte big endian scalar hash and returns two 32 byte big endian scalars that describe a point on the eliptic curve secp256k1. ;) Code: sigringu.cpp: In function ‘int hashToEC(const uint8_t*, uint32_t, BIGNUM*, EC_POINT*)’: Nope, error is still there :) Yes, and we made no announcement for that commit too. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: glen123 on February 28, 2016, 10:47:47 PM hth
logfile.txt https://copy.com/IONneq2mTBKRUOVN seems that one : g++: error: /usr/local/lib/libgmp.a: not found ! sudo apt-get install libgmp3-dev does not fix that Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: stoner19 on February 28, 2016, 10:52:54 PM hth You have to manually extract and install it to that dir, per the instructions from the dev the other day. logfile.txt https://copy.com/IONneq2mTBKRUOVN seems that one : g++: error: /usr/local/lib/libgmp.a: not found ! sudo apt-get install libgmp3-dev does not fix that Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: stoner19 on February 28, 2016, 10:57:11 PM Far as I can see mining and payouts are working perfectly on my pool, are they not?
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: chrisvl on February 28, 2016, 10:57:58 PM hth ii solved removing this line https://github.com/EclipseCrypto/eclipse/blob/master/src/makefile.unix#L274logfile.txt https://copy.com/IONneq2mTBKRUOVN seems that one : g++: error: /usr/local/lib/libgmp.a: not found ! sudo apt-get install libgmp3-dev does not fix that Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: glen123 on February 28, 2016, 11:07:36 PM make[3]: Entering directory '/root/gmp/gmp-6.1.0'
/bin/mkdir -p '/usr/local/lib' /bin/bash ./libtool --mode=install /usr/bin/install -c libgmp.la '/usr/local/lib' libtool: install: /usr/bin/install -c .libs/libgmp.so.10.3.0 /usr/local/lib/libgmp.so.10.3.0 libtool: install: (cd /usr/local/lib && { ln -s -f libgmp.so.10.3.0 libgmp.so.10 || { rm -f libgmp.so.10 && ln -s libgmp.so.10.3.0 libgmp.so.10; }; }) libtool: install: (cd /usr/local/lib && { ln -s -f libgmp.so.10.3.0 libgmp.so || { rm -f libgmp.so && ln -s libgmp.so.10.3.0 libgmp.so; }; }) libtool: install: /usr/bin/install -c .libs/libgmp.lai /usr/local/lib/libgmp.la libtool: install: /usr/bin/install -c .libs/libgmp.a /usr/local/lib/libgmp.a libtool: install: chmod 644 /usr/local/lib/libgmp.a libtool: install: ranlib /usr/local/lib/libgmp.a libtool: finish: PATH="/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/games:/sbin" ldconfig -n /usr/local/lib ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Libraries have been installed in: /usr/local/lib and now the last try to compile again Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on February 28, 2016, 11:10:45 PM hth ii solved removing this line https://github.com/EclipseCrypto/eclipse/blob/master/src/makefile.unix#L274logfile.txt https://copy.com/IONneq2mTBKRUOVN seems that one : g++: error: /usr/local/lib/libgmp.a: not found ! sudo apt-get install libgmp3-dev does not fix that Please do not remove that line. You need to link against our secp256k1 library and that is where the makefile tells you to link to the one that is built and that we provide which is located in that directory. As for the gmp issue, we mentioned this before that you have to install gmp manually into /usr/local/lib since gmp has a broken pkg-config when used in conjunction with secp256k1 (any secp256k1). Please try the following to do a fresh clone and try again to install rm -rf eclipse git clone https://github.com/EclipseCrypto/eclipse.git cd eclipse/src make -f makefile.unix Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: glen123 on February 28, 2016, 11:16:56 PM ;D ;D ;D ;D
EclipseCrypto version v1.0.0.0-g (2016-02-28 15:17:03 -0700) Operating in full mode. Using OpenSSL version OpenSSL 1.0.1f 6 Jan 2014 Startup time: 02/28/16 23:16:06 Default data directory /root/.eclipsecrypto Used data directory /root/.eclipsecrypto dbenv.open LogDir=/root/.eclipsecrypto/database ErrorFile=/root/.eclipsecrypto/db.log Bound to 127.0.0.1:35914 TOR thread started. AddLocal(eedngwl7r7p3aqc5.onion:35914,6) Loading block index... Opening LevelDB in /root/.eclipsecrypto/txleveldb Opened LevelDB successfully SetBestChain: new best=000001e79ad85e44c7b1 height=0 trust=4194320 blocktrust=4194320 date=02/23/16 08:54:20 ResetSyncCheckpoint: pending for sync-checkpoint 00000eca234f07edc98aaf3f2a7b7478dc58992a9cd439323d099c6a590ca2bb ERROR: LoadBlockIndex() : failed to reset sync-checkpoint EclipseCrypto: Error loading blkindex.dat Finalise() StopNode() Flushed 0 addresses to peers.dat 1ms Shutdown complete. ;D ;D ;D ;D Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: chrisvl on February 28, 2016, 11:17:52 PM ;D ;D ;D ;D try to restart it EclipseCrypto version v1.0.0.0-g (2016-02-28 15:17:03 -0700) Operating in full mode. Using OpenSSL version OpenSSL 1.0.1f 6 Jan 2014 Startup time: 02/28/16 23:16:06 Default data directory /root/.eclipsecrypto Used data directory /root/.eclipsecrypto dbenv.open LogDir=/root/.eclipsecrypto/database ErrorFile=/root/.eclipsecrypto/db.log Bound to 127.0.0.1:35914 TOR thread started. AddLocal(eedngwl7r7p3aqc5.onion:35914,6) Loading block index... Opening LevelDB in /root/.eclipsecrypto/txleveldb Opened LevelDB successfully SetBestChain: new best=000001e79ad85e44c7b1 height=0 trust=4194320 blocktrust=4194320 date=02/23/16 08:54:20 ResetSyncCheckpoint: pending for sync-checkpoint 00000eca234f07edc98aaf3f2a7b7478dc58992a9cd439323d099c6a590ca2bb ERROR: LoadBlockIndex() : failed to reset sync-checkpoint EclipseCrypto: Error loading blkindex.dat Finalise() StopNode() Flushed 0 addresses to peers.dat 1ms Shutdown complete. ;D ;D ;D ;D Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: glen123 on February 28, 2016, 11:18:51 PM whats the name of the.conf file ?
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: chrisvl on February 28, 2016, 11:19:41 PM whats the name of the.conf file ? eclipsecrypto.confTitle: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on February 28, 2016, 11:21:06 PM ;D ;D ;D ;D try to restart it EclipseCrypto version v1.0.0.0-g (2016-02-28 15:17:03 -0700) Operating in full mode. Using OpenSSL version OpenSSL 1.0.1f 6 Jan 2014 Startup time: 02/28/16 23:16:06 Default data directory /root/.eclipsecrypto Used data directory /root/.eclipsecrypto dbenv.open LogDir=/root/.eclipsecrypto/database ErrorFile=/root/.eclipsecrypto/db.log Bound to 127.0.0.1:35914 TOR thread started. AddLocal(eedngwl7r7p3aqc5.onion:35914,6) Loading block index... Opening LevelDB in /root/.eclipsecrypto/txleveldb Opened LevelDB successfully SetBestChain: new best=000001e79ad85e44c7b1 height=0 trust=4194320 blocktrust=4194320 date=02/23/16 08:54:20 ResetSyncCheckpoint: pending for sync-checkpoint 00000eca234f07edc98aaf3f2a7b7478dc58992a9cd439323d099c6a590ca2bb ERROR: LoadBlockIndex() : failed to reset sync-checkpoint EclipseCrypto: Error loading blkindex.dat Finalise() StopNode() Flushed 0 addresses to peers.dat 1ms Shutdown complete. ;D ;D ;D ;D Yes. Sorry. You need to start it twice. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: glen123 on February 28, 2016, 11:26:14 PM listen=1
server=1 daemon=1 rpcuser=xxxxxxxxxx rpcpassword=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx rpcport=2336 ( that port i want ! ) rpcallowip=127.0.0.1 staking=0\n enableaccounts=1 ./eclipsed EclipseCrypto server starting root@gcpool:~/eclipse/src# EclipseCrypto: Unable to bind to 127.0.0.1:35914 on this computer. EclipseCrypto is probably already running. EclipseCrypto: Failed to listen on any port. hmmhhmhm Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: chrisvl on February 28, 2016, 11:27:53 PM listen=1 ./eclipsed stop and try it again server=1 daemon=1 rpcuser=xxxxxxxxxx rpcpassword=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx rpcport=2336 ( that port i want ! ) rpcallowip=127.0.0.1 staking=0\n enableaccounts=1 ./eclipsed EclipseCrypto server starting root@gcpool:~/eclipse/src# EclipseCrypto: Unable to bind to 127.0.0.1:35914 on this computer. EclipseCrypto is probably already running. EclipseCrypto: Failed to listen on any port. hmmhhmhm Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: ocminer on February 28, 2016, 11:28:11 PM Never run anything as root ..
The latest commit is compiling and running fine now finally Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: chrisvl on February 28, 2016, 11:29:26 PM Never run anything as root .. yes run fine The latest commit is compiling and running fine now finally Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: glen123 on February 28, 2016, 11:30:19 PM ist meine "compile" umgebung :)
btw : könnte immer noch ein wenig SSO MPOS Hilfe brauchen , die Caches/Tokens machen mir zu schaffen . Datenbanke funken Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on February 28, 2016, 11:32:01 PM Never run anything as root .. The latest commit is compiling and running fine now finally Thanks for sticking with it! We appreciate all the support you provide for every coin that you offer mining services for. If there are asshole voices coming from this account, it's because there are several of us. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: glen123 on February 28, 2016, 11:33:03 PM it does not allow to change RPC Port with my eclipsecrypto.conf
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: chrisvl on February 28, 2016, 11:34:07 PM it does not allow to change RPC Port with my eclipsecrypto.conf why ? i use 3333Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: glen123 on February 28, 2016, 11:36:06 PM i need multiple ports for different coins
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: chrisvl on February 28, 2016, 11:36:48 PM I have errors during the compilation dev without #include "eclipse.h" in init.h the error is solved is required the #include "eclipse.h" ?Code: src/init.h:10:21: fatal error: eclipse.h: The file or directory does not exist Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: glen123 on February 28, 2016, 11:44:05 PM sorry , my fault with the .conf file .
Too sleepy rightnow and Eyes to lazy all good "version" : "v1.0.0.0-g", "mode" : "full", "state" : "Full Node", "protocolversion" : 60017, "walletversion" : 10500, "balance" : 0.00000000, "eclipsebalance" : 0.00000000, "newmint" : 0.00000000, "stake" : 0.00000000, "reserve" : 0.00000000, "blocks" : 802, "timeoffset" : -1, "moneysupply" : 1313221.25350400, "connections" : 10, "datareceived" : "426.91 KB", "datasent" : "49.62 KB", "proxy" : "", "ip" : "eedngwl7r7p3aqc5.onion", "difficulty" : { "proof-of-work" : 9143104.18414356, "proof-of-stake" : 182635.91124866 }, "testnet" : false, "keypoolsize" : 0, "paytxfee" : 0.00020000, "mininput" : 0.00000000, "errors" : "" Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on February 28, 2016, 11:47:11 PM I have errors during the compilation dev without #include "eclipse.h" in init.h the error is solved is required the #include "eclipse.h" ?Code: src/init.h:10:21: fatal error: eclipse.h: The file or directory does not exist Are you sure that secp256k1 finished building? You can't comment out that include. Your error looks like secp256k1 didn't finish building. Did you try a fresh pull and build with our make file? Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on February 29, 2016, 04:11:52 AM Eclipse Twitter Promotion!
In order to star to bring awareness to Eclipse, we are going to be making a large push on Twitter and rewarding our followers who participate! The first promotion will reward users with 15 EC simply for following twitter.com/EclipseCrypto (http://twitter.com/EclipseCrypto) and providing your EC address. Step 1: Sign on to Twitter and follow twitter.com/EclipseCrypto (http://twitter.com/EclipseCrypto) Step 2: Fill out this Google form to provide us your address so we can track activity without annoying you every time: http://goo. gl/forms/ga2gcFsUsO (copy/remove space) Here are the rules: 1: Obviously you've gotta be a follower 2: You have to have at least 50 REAL followers (we'll verify on TwitterAudit) 3: Participate and earn EC That's it. Stay tuned to the thread and we'll have regular promotions to earn additional EC! Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on February 29, 2016, 04:54:51 AM Never run anything as root .. The latest commit is compiling and running fine now finally Thank you. Shot you a PM as well. Looks like ec.suprnova.cc (http://ec.suprnova.cc) is up and running, okay to mine there? Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: wildduck on February 29, 2016, 07:44:17 AM Ofcourse mate suprnova.cc most reliable pool out there.
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on February 29, 2016, 08:05:41 AM Far as I can see mining and payouts are working perfectly on my pool, are they not? A few on the team have been mining on your pool since you opened it up and superninjapool . tk has been rock solid. One thing: if you tweaked the source to remove the secp256k1 dependency in sigringu.cpp, please rebuild with the latest commit. Removing the dependency will, when validating certain kinds of sending transactions, result in an uninitialized array with essentially random values. This means your node will reject some valid transactions. We guess you probably fixed it by modifying the autoconf generated configure file, but if you changed the source you might run into the problem described. Thanks again for your pool services! Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: stoner19 on February 29, 2016, 04:09:33 PM Far as I can see mining and payouts are working perfectly on my pool, are they not? A few on the team have been mining on your pool since you opened it up and superninjapool . tk has been rock solid. One thing: if you tweaked the source to remove the secp256k1 dependency in sigringu.cpp, please rebuild with the latest commit. Removing the dependency will, when validating certain kinds of sending transactions, result in an uninitialized array with essentially random values. This means your node will reject some valid transactions. We guess you probably fixed it by modifying the autoconf generated configure file, but if you changed the source you might run into the problem described. Thanks again for your pool services! Hope everyone has been happy with the mining so far at superninjapool.tk (http://superninjapool.tk) ;D Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Bank_sy on February 29, 2016, 04:43:14 PM what is the purpose of this coin?
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: voteformeg on February 29, 2016, 04:58:07 PM Far as I can see mining and payouts are working perfectly on my pool, are they not? A few on the team have been mining on your pool since you opened it up and superninjapool . tk has been rock solid. One thing: if you tweaked the source to remove the secp256k1 dependency in sigringu.cpp, please rebuild with the latest commit. Removing the dependency will, when validating certain kinds of sending transactions, result in an uninitialized array with essentially random values. This means your node will reject some valid transactions. We guess you probably fixed it by modifying the autoconf generated configure file, but if you changed the source you might run into the problem described. Thanks again for your pool services! Hope everyone has been happy with the mining so far at superninjapool.tk (http://superninjapool.tk) ;D i'm happy with your pool Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on February 29, 2016, 05:52:43 PM what is the purpose of this coin? To hell with it, here comes the cat out of the bag. Eclipse is the first truly cryptographically anonymous coin based on the bitcoin protocol. It is forked from shadowcash, which was completely de-anoned. See here: https://shnoe.wordpress.com/2016/02/11/de-anonymizing-shadowcash-and-oz-coin/ You will see from Shen Noether's write-up that they used a cryptographically insecure hashToEC function. Here, we replaced their hashToEC with a cryptographically secure variant. Right now shadowcash is still not anonymous. Eclipse is anonymous. The writeup linked above describes how the shadowcash hashToEC is broken, so I won't go into it here. We use what is known as "try-and-increment hashing to an elliptic curve". It is a simple algorithm that is used in several cryptosystems. Key image with our algo goes like this: 1. take a scalar hash (e.g. SHA256d) of the public key (k) and map it to x on the secp256k1 discrete field 2. determine whether this x is a quadratic residue of secp256k1 3. if x is not a quadratic residue, set x = x+1 and go to 2 4. else x is a quadratic residue so keep the point x, y, where y is the positive solution to x for secp256k1, let's call this point p 5. multiply the point p = (x,y) by the scalar representing the private key x, such that key image I = xp You can verify this is our algo by looking at secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes() in our source tree at src/secp256k1/secp256k1/src/secp256k1.c. Rather than re-invent the wheel, we used bitcoin's secp256k1 library to determine the suitability of x and to find it's root to map point x,y. Happy mining! Edit: I forgot to add that anyone who investigates may come across a caveat about try-and-increment where it is subject to "timing attack". Timing attack is absolutely not relevant to ring signatures though, because everyone already knows what a timing attack might reveal: the curve, the input k, and the scalar hash algorithm used. Going back to the original cryptonote white paper, the private key x is protected by discrete logarithm hardness. Edit: We have a whitepaper coming that goes into more detail and summarizes Shen's work. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: BlockchainDynamics on February 29, 2016, 06:12:24 PM Thanks for the informative post Eclipse. Tweeted it out because it seems to be a significant addition to this coin.
The Eclipse launch was noted on our podcast on saturday. If you are interested in hearing the part about eclipse you can check it out @ http://thecryptoworld.org/innagural-blockchain-dynamics-radio-show the mention of Eclipse is @ 49:04:00 . It is brief but we were going through many coins and could only mention them for a minute. I will be sure to describe your post with this update about Eclipse on our next show and if you have any more information we could pass on, or if you yourself would like to speak on the show, please let me know. Best of luck on your project https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1379730 Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon SHA256d ▲ HiPoS ▲ Mine Now! Post by: OSMIUMCOIN on February 29, 2016, 07:01:26 PM Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon SHA256d ▲ HiPoS ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on February 29, 2016, 07:06:25 PM We are very interested. Obviously, we can't post pictures yet, but we are currently discussing the look. A comment from one of the devs: "i like it, only thing that is an issue with me is that the planet in the center (or whatever it is) makes me think of a negative connotation (like no smoking or whatever)....i mean, if it were more planet-y, i like it". Also, it is "eclipse crypto", not "coin" because there are technically more than one "coin" here. Is it possible to give the "e" less of a negative connotation? We are also discussing a bounty. We know this is work. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon SHA256d ▲ HiPoS ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Mark Zuckerberg on February 29, 2016, 08:46:32 PM NICE!! That is great looking work. I'm shocked at the reveal after the iffy launch. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon SHA256d ▲ HiPoS ▲ Mine Now! Post by: stoner19 on February 29, 2016, 08:50:16 PM Sometimes communication is easier on IRC vs the forums here at bitcointalk, so I registered and created the channel if anyone is interested in joining/participating. #eclipsecoin (https://kiwiirc.com/client/irc.freenode.net/#eclipsecoin) on freenode.
https://kiwiirc.com/client/irc.freenode.net/#eclipsecoin (https://kiwiirc.com/client/irc.freenode.net/#eclipsecoin) Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon SHA256d ▲ HiPoS ▲ Mine Now! Post by: stoner19 on February 29, 2016, 09:13:20 PM Is there a block explorer yet? If not, I'd suggest making that next on your list of things to do.
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Bank_sy on February 29, 2016, 10:38:29 PM what is the purpose of this coin? To hell with it, here comes the cat out of the bag. Eclipse is the first truly cryptographically anonymous coin based on the bitcoin protocol. It is forked from shadowcash, which was completely de-anoned. See here: https://shnoe.wordpress.com/2016/02/11/de-anonymizing-shadowcash-and-oz-coin/ You will see from Shen Noether's write-up that they used a cryptographically insecure hashToEC function. Here, we replaced their hashToEC with a cryptographically secure variant. Right now shadowcash is still not anonymous. Eclipse is anonymous. The writeup linked above describes how the shadowcash hashToEC is broken, so I won't go into it here. We use what is known as "try-and-increment hashing to an elliptic curve". It is a simple algorithm that is used in several cryptosystems. Key image with our algo goes like this: 1. take a scalar hash (e.g. SHA256d) of the public key (k) and map it to x on the secp256k1 discrete field 2. determine whether this x is a quadratic residue of secp256k1 3. if x is not a quadratic residue, set x = x+1 and go to 2 4. else x is a quadratic residue so keep the point x, y, where y is the positive solution to x for secp256k1, let's call this point p 5. multiply the point p = (x,y) by the scalar representing the private key x, such that key image I = xp You can verify this is our algo by looking at secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes() in our source tree at src/secp256k1/secp256k1/src/secp256k1.c. Rather than re-invent the wheel, we used bitcoin's secp256k1 library to determine the suitability of x and to find it's root to map point x,y. Happy mining! Edit: I forgot to add that anyone who investigates may come across a caveat about try-and-increment where it is subject to "timing attack". Timing attack is absolutely not relevant to ring signatures though, because everyone already knows what a timing attack might reveal: the curve, the input k, and the scalar hash algorithm used. Going back to the original cryptonote white paper, the private key x is protected by discrete logarithm hardness. Edit: We have a whitepaper coming that goes into more detail and summarizes Shen's work. that is cool, I was expecting just another shitcoin but this looks like it might have some actual potential. you have caught my interest. I am hoping that you will be able to bring more to the table than just the fix in shadowcash. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on February 29, 2016, 11:01:13 PM that is cool, I was expecting just another shitcoin but this looks like it might have some actual potential. you have caught my interest. I am hoping that you will be able to bring more to the table than just the fix in shadowcash. It's not "just a fix". You actually have to know what you are doing and be able to do it correctly. It's not like we fixed a typo somewhere. Shadowcash didn't know what they were doing and got completely de-anoned. They are still trying to figure out the correct way to do it. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Bank_sy on February 29, 2016, 11:16:36 PM that is cool, I was expecting just another shitcoin but this looks like it might have some actual potential. you have caught my interest. I am hoping that you will be able to bring more to the table than just the fix in shadowcash. It's not "just a fix". You actually have to know what you are doing and be able to do it correctly. It's not like we fixed a typo somewhere. Shadowcash didn't know what they were doing and got completely de-anoned. They are still trying to figure out the correct way to do it. I did not mean to underplay your fix for shadowcash, apologies if I have offended. Just wanted to say I hope you will continue to improve eclipse in ways other than fixing the anonymity flaw in shadowcash because there is potential for eclipse. Suggestion: if the fix is indeed correct, having it verified somehow will bring much more credibility and attention to eclipse. I am not capable of verifying it otherwise I would gladly volunteer. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on February 29, 2016, 11:19:52 PM that is cool, I was expecting just another shitcoin but this looks like it might have some actual potential. you have caught my interest. I am hoping that you will be able to bring more to the table than just the fix in shadowcash. It's not "just a fix". You actually have to know what you are doing and be able to do it correctly. It's not like we fixed a typo somewhere. Shadowcash didn't know what they were doing and got completely de-anoned. They are still trying to figure out the correct way to do it. I did not mean to underplay your fix for shadowcash, apologies if I have offended. Just wanted to say I hope you will continue to improve eclipse in ways other than fixing the anonymity flaw in shadowcash because there is potential for eclipse. Suggestion: if the fix is indeed correct, having it verified somehow will bring much more credibility and attention to eclipse. I am not capable of verifying it otherwise I would gladly volunteer. We hope to offer Shen Noether a bounty for a review of our method. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Bank_sy on February 29, 2016, 11:53:04 PM that is cool, I was expecting just another shitcoin but this looks like it might have some actual potential. you have caught my interest. I am hoping that you will be able to bring more to the table than just the fix in shadowcash. It's not "just a fix". You actually have to know what you are doing and be able to do it correctly. It's not like we fixed a typo somewhere. Shadowcash didn't know what they were doing and got completely de-anoned. They are still trying to figure out the correct way to do it. I did not mean to underplay your fix for shadowcash, apologies if I have offended. Just wanted to say I hope you will continue to improve eclipse in ways other than fixing the anonymity flaw in shadowcash because there is potential for eclipse. Suggestion: if the fix is indeed correct, having it verified somehow will bring much more credibility and attention to eclipse. I am not capable of verifying it otherwise I would gladly volunteer. We hope to offer Shen Noether a bounty for a review of our method. Great idea Shen providing a review would be great for Eclipse. I was getting the opinion of others on SDC/Eclipse and a good point was brought up. any input or thoughts from the XMR camp? Does this mean Eclipse is cryptograhically anonymous? They seem to have at least tried to fix the one identified flaw in SDC. Whether SDC has other flaws they didn't fix or whether their fix is even correct is not something anyone can answer without spending a lot of time reviewing it all, which probably won't ever happen. Valid points, I am hoping they will be able to get their 'fix' properly reviewed. Assuming the fix is indeed correct, would that mean that it is then truly anonymous? In other words: if recently exposed flaw in SDC anonymity was fixed, does it make SDC as/more anonymous as XMR? or is SDC still inferior to XMR for anonymity? What about the other 99.999% of SDC, developed by the same people who made a basic math/crypto error, and which no one has ever reviewed? Shen found that one flaw effectively by accident, while working on something else. If SDC were comprehensively reviewed, then one could make claims about it. At this point, I would not. Have you considered the possibility of this? Is there a reason why you chose shadowcash method of anonymity over other ways of anonymity? Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 01, 2016, 01:33:42 AM Great idea Shen providing a review would be great for Eclipse. I was getting the opinion of others on SDC/Eclipse and a good point was brought up. any input or thoughts from the XMR camp? Does this mean Eclipse is cryptograhically anonymous? They seem to have at least tried to fix the one identified flaw in SDC. Whether SDC has other flaws they didn't fix or whether their fix is even correct is not something anyone can answer without spending a lot of time reviewing it all, which probably won't ever happen. Valid points, I am hoping they will be able to get their 'fix' properly reviewed. Assuming the fix is indeed correct, would that mean that it is then truly anonymous? In other words: if recently exposed flaw in SDC anonymity was fixed, does it make SDC as/more anonymous as XMR? or is SDC still inferior to XMR for anonymity? What about the other 99.999% of SDC, developed by the same people who made a basic math/crypto error, and which no one has ever reviewed? Shen found that one flaw effectively by accident, while working on something else. If SDC were comprehensively reviewed, then one could make claims about it. At this point, I would not. Have you considered the possibility of this? Is there a reason why you chose shadowcash method of anonymity over other ways of anonymity? As usual, smooth has beautiful insight, but it's not an insight that wasn't also obvious to us. It's important to understand that SDC ported the cryptonote ring signature system to the bitcoin codebase, almost in it's entirety. You can see what I mean in the naming of the methods: CN: hash_to_ec --> SDC: hashToEC CN: generate_key_image --> SDC: generateKeyImage CN: generate_ring_signature --> SDC: generateRingSignature Why is this important? Because where SDC has an opportunity to deviate, they may create security flaws. Here, they chose to use curve secp256k1, which has a number of useful properties, most notably the potential for an very efficient implementation, as has been created by bitcoin. In choosing secp256k1, they had no template function by which to map a scalar hash (SHA256d) to an EC point. So they did the most "obvious" and provably wrong thing, they took the scalar multiple of the EC base point, using the hash as the scalar. Shen discovered this flaw, we absolutely do not want to take credit for his insight. In general, SDC did not deviate significantly from cryptonote elsewhere from what we can tell. Thus, since they followed the cryptonote recipe, the rest of the ring signature system will be as secure as cryptonote for the simple reason that there are not many ways to screw it up. Once you have the EC point from the hash, generating the signature and key image is identical to the cryptonote method. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon SHA256d ▲ HiPoS ▲ Mine Now! Post by: NextGenCrypto on March 01, 2016, 02:43:12 AM I dunno what any of this mumbo jumbo means, but I hope someone reputable can provide some input.
Thanks again to stoner19 for the early pool. Sometimes ya just gotta take the risk. In my case, I just love to waste BTC mining what are normally shitcoins. ;D Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Bank_sy on March 01, 2016, 03:01:26 AM Great idea Shen providing a review would be great for Eclipse. I was getting the opinion of others on SDC/Eclipse and a good point was brought up. any input or thoughts from the XMR camp? Does this mean Eclipse is cryptograhically anonymous? They seem to have at least tried to fix the one identified flaw in SDC. Whether SDC has other flaws they didn't fix or whether their fix is even correct is not something anyone can answer without spending a lot of time reviewing it all, which probably won't ever happen. Valid points, I am hoping they will be able to get their 'fix' properly reviewed. Assuming the fix is indeed correct, would that mean that it is then truly anonymous? In other words: if recently exposed flaw in SDC anonymity was fixed, does it make SDC as/more anonymous as XMR? or is SDC still inferior to XMR for anonymity? What about the other 99.999% of SDC, developed by the same people who made a basic math/crypto error, and which no one has ever reviewed? Shen found that one flaw effectively by accident, while working on something else. If SDC were comprehensively reviewed, then one could make claims about it. At this point, I would not. Have you considered the possibility of this? Is there a reason why you chose shadowcash method of anonymity over other ways of anonymity? As usual, smooth has beautiful insight, but it's not an insight that wasn't also obvious to us. It's important to understand that SDC ported the cryptonote ring signature system to the bitcoin codebase, almost in it's entirety. You can see what I mean in the naming of the methods: CN: hash_to_ec --> SDC: hashToEC CN: generate_key_image --> SDC: generateKeyImage CN: generate_ring_signature --> SDC: generateRingSignature Why is this important? Because where SDC has an opportunity to deviate, they may create security flaws. Here, they chose to use curve secp256k1, which has a number of useful properties, most notably the potential for an very efficient implementation, as has been created by bitcoin. In choosing secp256k1, they had no template function by which to map a scalar hash (SHA256d) to an EC point. So they did the most "obvious" and provably wrong thing, they took the scalar multiple of the EC base point, using the hash as the scalar. Shen discovered this flaw, we absolutely do not want to take credit for his insight. In general, SDC did not deviate significantly from cryptonote elsewhere from what we can tell. Thus, since they followed the cryptonote recipe, the rest of the ring signature system will be as secure as cryptonote for the simple reason that there are not many ways to screw it up. Once you have the EC point from the hash, generating the signature and key image is identical to the cryptonote method. It appears that the devs behind eclipse are at least somewhat competent at coding and if you have managed to successfully fix the flaw then great job. I have some realistic concerns about eclipse though. If the fix is the only new implementation for eclipse then eclipse will simply fade away when SDC applies a fix as well. There would be no appeal to utilize SDC over Eclipse with all things being equal in terms of anonymity. My next concern is potential flaws in other parts of SDC code, this means Eclipse will also be vulnerable to them. Do you guys have plans for eclipse other than applying the fix? Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 01, 2016, 03:34:21 AM Just a reminder about our Twitter promo! We've had a good number of responses so far. :D
Eclipse Twitter Promotion! In order to star to bring awareness to Eclipse, we are going to be making a large push on Twitter and rewarding our followers who participate! The first promotion will reward users with 15 EC simply for following twitter.com/EclipseCrypto (http://twitter.com/EclipseCrypto) and providing your EC address. Step 1: Sign on to Twitter and follow twitter.com/EclipseCrypto (http://twitter.com/EclipseCrypto) Step 2: Fill out this Google form to provide us your address so we can track activity without annoying you every time: http://goo. gl/forms/ga2gcFsUsO (copy/remove space) Here are the rules: 1: Obviously you've gotta be a follower 2: You have to have at least 50 REAL followers (we'll verify on TwitterAudit) 3: Participate and earn EC That's it. Stay tuned to the thread and we'll have regular promotions to earn additional EC! Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon SHA256d ▲ HiPoS ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Black Mamba on March 01, 2016, 04:56:52 AM POS starts after POW is done?
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon SHA256d ▲ HiPoS ▲ Mine Now! Post by: pol5 on March 01, 2016, 05:10:15 AM I like this coin ;)
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon SHA256d ▲ HiPoS ▲ Mine Now! Post by: NextGenCrypto on March 01, 2016, 05:14:37 AM POS starts after POW is done? PoS has already started... Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon SHA256d ▲ HiPoS ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Bank_sy on March 01, 2016, 05:17:34 AM POS starts after POW is done? PoS has already started... Currently PoW/PoS PoS V2 PoS Min Age: 8 hours HiPoS Length: 4 Weeks HiPoS Reward: 300 Corona, decreasing by 10/day to 20 Corona Post-HiPoS Reward: 10 Corona this coin is promising, just hope devs have more planned than the anonymity fix. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon SHA256d ▲ HiPoS ▲ Mine Now! Post by: snortex on March 01, 2016, 05:43:31 AM POS starts after POW is done? PoS has already started... Currently PoW/PoS PoS V2 PoS Min Age: 8 hours HiPoS Length: 4 Weeks HiPoS Reward: 300 Corona, decreasing by 10/day to 20 Corona Post-HiPoS Reward: 10 Corona this coin is promising, just hope devs have more planned than the anonymity fix. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon SHA256d ▲ HiPoS ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 01, 2016, 06:19:27 AM It appears that the devs behind eclipse are at least somewhat competent at coding and if you have managed to successfully fix the flaw then great job. I have some realistic concerns about eclipse though. If the fix is the only new implementation for eclipse then eclipse will simply fade away when SDC applies a fix as well. There would be no appeal to utilize SDC over Eclipse with all things being equal in terms of anonymity. My next concern is potential flaws in other parts of SDC code, this means Eclipse will also be vulnerable to them. Do you guys have plans for eclipse other than applying the fix? Yes, we have an internal roadmap. But before we make it public, we need to see for ourselves what kind of potential there is for an anonymous coin. Our motivation was to get some people who know cryptography and math (us) together with a coin that has good anonymity. We aren't for bells and whistles until the potential of the underlying protocol is fully realized. However, if you like bells and whistles, those that come with shadowcoin are pretty good. If you insist, our near-term plans are twofold and a little technical. 1. First, we need to bring the bitcoin secp256k1 library to the entirety of the Eclipse code base. This means not only using it as an API for patching the broken shadowcash ring signatures (which we have done), but also to use it for all of the operations over secp256k1. This also means integrating Schnorr signatures, which are native to the bitcoin secp256k1 library. 2. Second the current implementation needs proper blockchain pruning. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon SHA256d ▲ HiPoS ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Bank_sy on March 01, 2016, 07:05:45 AM It appears that the devs behind eclipse are at least somewhat competent at coding and if you have managed to successfully fix the flaw then great job. I have some realistic concerns about eclipse though. If the fix is the only new implementation for eclipse then eclipse will simply fade away when SDC applies a fix as well. There would be no appeal to utilize SDC over Eclipse with all things being equal in terms of anonymity. My next concern is potential flaws in other parts of SDC code, this means Eclipse will also be vulnerable to them. Do you guys have plans for eclipse other than applying the fix? Yes, we have an internal roadmap. But before we make it public, we need to see for ourselves what kind of potential there is for an anonymous coin. Our motivation was to get some people who know cryptography and math (us) together with a coin that has good anonymity. We aren't for bells and whistles until the potential of the underlying protocol is fully realized. However, if you like bells and whistles, those that come with shadowcoin are pretty good. If you insist, our near-term plans are twofold and a little technical. 1. First, we need to bring the bitcoin secp256k1 library to the entirety of the Eclipse code base. This means not only using it as an API for patching the broken shadowcash ring signatures (which we have done), but also to use it for all of the operations over secp256k1. This also means integrating Schnorr signatures, which are native to the bitcoin secp256k1 library. 2. Second the current implementation needs proper blockchain pruning. Thanks for your continued responses. It is good to hear that you have a vision for eclipse that expands beyond the anonymity fix. The sky is the limit for an anonymous coin but only if it is truly anonymous. I am looking forward to see everything take hold and hope to see eclipse as a top contender for anonymity. I remain a bit skeptical of how dedicated you will be to eclipse because quite frankly the altcoin scene is just an absolute mess but I am liking eclipse much more than any other recent garbage launches. Hard work will pay off so I hope you remain dedicated to eclipse and success will follow! Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon SHA256d ▲ HiPoS ▲ Mine Now! Post by: cryptohunter2 on March 01, 2016, 07:21:03 AM bring it to some exchanges else will end up in the hands of 10 people who mine shart 256 and the coin will fail already?
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon SHA256d ▲ HiPoS ▲ Mine Now! Post by: NextGenCrypto on March 01, 2016, 07:27:55 AM bring it to some exchanges else will end up in the hands of 10 people who mine shart 256 and the coin will fail already? ??? http://puu.sh/nqG3m/3ad95c4057.png Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon SHA256d ▲ HiPoS ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Bank_sy on March 01, 2016, 07:33:49 AM bring it to some exchanges else will end up in the hands of 10 people who mine shart 256 and the coin will fail already? ??? http://puu.sh/nqG3m/3ad95c4057.png wow considering block rewards are not even that high, that is quite alot of hash power.... https://gyazo.com/4cc887e734919b00894ba9ca780ada01 Network weight has gone up by almost double in the last few hours as well :o :o Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon SHA256d ▲ HiPoS ▲ Mine Now! Post by: blacklizard on March 01, 2016, 11:42:47 AM If one says that SDC is not anonymous then that person doesn't know how to bloody use it (right).
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon SHA256d ▲ HiPoS ▲ Mine Now! Post by: chrisvl on March 01, 2016, 11:45:22 AM https://ec.suprnova.cc 460 ths network hashrate 1 + phs
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: allyouracid on March 01, 2016, 12:23:23 PM hth ii solved removing this line https://github.com/EclipseCrypto/eclipse/blob/master/src/makefile.unix#L274logfile.txt https://copy.com/IONneq2mTBKRUOVN seems that one : g++: error: /usr/local/lib/libgmp.a: not found ! sudo apt-get install libgmp3-dev does not fix that Every line in the code has its purpose, and by deleting stuff, you just delay the problems to later. You have to solve problems by setting up the dependencies. No way around that. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: chrisvl on March 01, 2016, 12:30:02 PM hth ii solved removing this line https://github.com/EclipseCrypto/eclipse/blob/master/src/makefile.unix#L274logfile.txt https://copy.com/IONneq2mTBKRUOVN seems that one : g++: error: /usr/local/lib/libgmp.a: not found ! sudo apt-get install libgmp3-dev does not fix that Every line in the code has its purpose, and by deleting stuff, you just delay the problems to later. You have to solve problems by setting up the dependencies. No way around that. personally not studied the code i have no time,to me work fine I tried to help Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon SHA256d ▲ HiPoS ▲ Mine Now! Post by: stoner19 on March 01, 2016, 02:51:45 PM Over the course of the next 3 weeks or so I'll be distributing a fairly significant bonus (equal .25% of the total supply) to all miners who use superninjapool.tk (http://superninjapool.tk).
Bonuses will be sent out separately from mining payouts near the end of each week and will be distributed based on a workers accepted shares for EC mining. Happy mining everyone! Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon SHA256d ▲ HiPoS ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 01, 2016, 04:16:47 PM If one says that SDC is not anonymous then that person doesn't know how to bloody use it (right). No SDC got bloody de-anoned 100%. If you think you are using at anonymously, you are bloody mistaken. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon SHA256d ▲ HiPoS ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Bank_sy on March 01, 2016, 04:51:46 PM If one says that SDC is not anonymous then that person doesn't know how to bloody use it (right). No SDC got bloody de-anoned 100%. If you think you are using at anonymously, you are bloody mistaken. here is the link for SDC anonymity flaw https://shnoe.wordpress.com/2016/02/11/de-anonymizing-shadowcash-and-oz-coin/ Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Wheatclove on March 01, 2016, 05:00:18 PM Why are you guys spamming the SDC thread and Slack?
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Bank_sy on March 01, 2016, 05:01:30 PM Why are you guys spamming the SDC thread and Slack? I don't see any spamming in the thread... I posted the 'fix' to SDCs anonymity bug because it concerns SDC, does it not? What I posted is very relevant to SDC. It's not like I was talking about rainbows and butterflies. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 01, 2016, 05:10:28 PM Why are you guys spamming the SDC thread and Slack? I don't see any spamming in the thread... I posted the 'fix' to SDCs anonymity bug because it concerns SDC, does it not? What I posted is very relevant to SDC. It's not like I was talking about rainbows and butterflies. SDC looks to be converging on a reasonable fix, but not a recommended one. Originally, they took the scalar hash then multiplied it by the private key and then used it for the scalar multiple of the group generator (two different types of "multiply" here but I didn't invent this convention). Math looks like I = H(K_i)xG That was the very wrong way. Now they take an arbitrary point on the curve by hashing the time stamp, trying to map it to a point, then using that point as a generator. This takes advantage of the fact that all curve points on a prime field can be full generators. The new generator is G* I = H(K_i)xG* There is a relationship between G and G*, namely one is a multiple of the of the other: G = aG* But in this case G* is "unknown log", so G is protected by discrete log hardness. In general, however, it is not good to try to use a generator to hash scalars to a curve. They already learned this lesson once. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Wheatclove on March 01, 2016, 05:10:40 PM Why are you guys spamming the SDC thread and Slack? I don't see any spamming in the thread... I posted the 'fix' to SDCs anonymity bug because it concerns SDC, does it not? What I posted is very relevant to SDC. It's not like I was talking about rainbows and butterflies. You claim to post a fix, but your posts contain much more than the actual proposed fix. You're posting an advertisement for this coin that attacks SDC. Twice you've done this. It doesn't concern SDC. The devs have implemented a fix on the testnet awhile ago and have been testing since. I'd focus on your own coin if I were you. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Bank_sy on March 01, 2016, 05:15:10 PM Why are you guys spamming the SDC thread and Slack? I don't see any spamming in the thread... I posted the 'fix' to SDCs anonymity bug because it concerns SDC, does it not? What I posted is very relevant to SDC. It's not like I was talking about rainbows and butterflies. You claim to post a fix, but your posts contain much more than the actual proposed fix. You're posting an advertisement for this coin that attacks SDC. Twice you've done this. It doesn't concern SDC. The devs have implemented a fix on the testnet awhile ago and have been testing since. I'd focus on your own coin if I were you. My post was a very reasonable one and was not an attack on SDC in anyway. It looks like my post was deleted, SDC thread has heavier censoring than I expected.... What are you guys so afraid of? I had interest in SDC before but it is quickly fading. They may be testing a fix but if other ways to fix are present, they should be looking at those ways too (if they are competent devs). This is not 'my' coin.. It is simply a coin that claims to have fixed the flaw in SDC so I have taken some interest in it. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 01, 2016, 05:15:18 PM Why are you guys spamming the SDC thread and Slack? I don't see any spamming in the thread... I posted the 'fix' to SDCs anonymity bug because it concerns SDC, does it not? What I posted is very relevant to SDC. It's not like I was talking about rainbows and butterflies. You claim to post a fix, but your posts contain much more than the actual proposed fix. You're posting an advertisement for this coin that attacks SDC. Twice you've done this. It doesn't concern SDC. The devs have implemented a fix on the testnet awhile ago and have been testing since. I'd focus on your own coin if I were you. You sound to me like a scared SDC bagholder. Did I hit the nail on the head?? Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Wheatclove on March 01, 2016, 05:17:28 PM Why are you guys spamming the SDC thread and Slack? I don't see any spamming in the thread... I posted the 'fix' to SDCs anonymity bug because it concerns SDC, does it not? What I posted is very relevant to SDC. It's not like I was talking about rainbows and butterflies. You claim to post a fix, but your posts contain much more than the actual proposed fix. You're posting an advertisement for this coin that attacks SDC. Twice you've done this. It doesn't concern SDC. The devs have implemented a fix on the testnet awhile ago and have been testing since. I'd focus on your own coin if I were you. You sound to me like a scared SDC bagholder. Did I hit the nail on the head?? I don't own any SDC. Your constructive, well-mannered criticisms are appreciated. Your other behavior is not. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Bank_sy on March 01, 2016, 05:18:55 PM Why are you guys spamming the SDC thread and Slack? I don't see any spamming in the thread... I posted the 'fix' to SDCs anonymity bug because it concerns SDC, does it not? What I posted is very relevant to SDC. It's not like I was talking about rainbows and butterflies. You claim to post a fix, but your posts contain much more than the actual proposed fix. You're posting an advertisement for this coin that attacks SDC. Twice you've done this. It doesn't concern SDC. The devs have implemented a fix on the testnet awhile ago and have been testing since. I'd focus on your own coin if I were you. You sound to me like a scared SDC bagholder. Did I hit the nail on the head?? He sounds exactly like that. I posted the same concerns in XMR thread and managed to receive alot of input and we managed to have some productive discussions about it I post in SDC and auto deleted and called spamming. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 01, 2016, 05:19:48 PM Why are you guys spamming the SDC thread and Slack? I don't see any spamming in the thread... I posted the 'fix' to SDCs anonymity bug because it concerns SDC, does it not? What I posted is very relevant to SDC. It's not like I was talking about rainbows and butterflies. You claim to post a fix, but your posts contain much more than the actual proposed fix. You're posting an advertisement for this coin that attacks SDC. Twice you've done this. It doesn't concern SDC. The devs have implemented a fix on the testnet awhile ago and have been testing since. I'd focus on your own coin if I were you. You sound to me like a scared SDC bagholder. Did I hit the nail on the head?? He sounds exactly like that. I posted the same concerns in XMR thread and managed to receive alot of input and we managed to have some productive discussions about it I post in SDC and auto deleted and called spamming. That's great to hear and we appreciate any constructive feedback, especially from those experienced in the XMR community. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 01, 2016, 05:46:25 PM Why are you guys spamming the SDC thread and Slack? I don't see any spamming in the thread... I posted the 'fix' to SDCs anonymity bug because it concerns SDC, does it not? What I posted is very relevant to SDC. It's not like I was talking about rainbows and butterflies. You claim to post a fix, but your posts contain much more than the actual proposed fix. You're posting an advertisement for this coin that attacks SDC. Twice you've done this. It doesn't concern SDC. The devs have implemented a fix on the testnet awhile ago and have been testing since. I'd focus on your own coin if I were you. You sound to me like a scared SDC bagholder. Did I hit the nail on the head?? I don't own any SDC. Your constructive, well-mannered criticisms are appreciated. Your other behavior is not. We can tell by your avatar that you don't own any SDC. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon SHA256d ▲ HiPoS ▲ Mine Now! Post by: NextGenCrypto on March 01, 2016, 07:22:58 PM Over the course of the next 3 weeks or so I'll be distributing a fairly significant bonus (equal .25% of the total supply) to all miners who use superninjapool.tk (http://superninjapool.tk). Bonuses will be sent out separately from mining payouts near the end of each week and will be distributed based on a workers accepted shares for EC mining. Happy mining everyone! Nice, this is awesome. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon SHA256d ▲ HiPoS ▲ Mine Now! Post by: johnnysof on March 01, 2016, 07:48:25 PM Over the course of the next 3 weeks or so I'll be distributing a fairly significant bonus (equal .25% of the total supply) to all miners who use superninjapool.tk (http://superninjapool.tk). Bonuses will be sent out separately from mining payouts near the end of each week and will be distributed based on a workers accepted shares for EC mining. Happy mining everyone! Nice, this is awesome. Seriously? Which total supply? I expect not the total coins supply, but the coins mined at your pool. Also .25% means probably 0.25%, so with other words you just reduce your fees from 2% to 1.75%. The other pool takes only 1%, I think you need other strategy... Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: kondiomir on March 01, 2016, 08:11:25 PM Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon SHA256d ▲ HiPoS ▲ Mine Now! Post by: stoner19 on March 01, 2016, 08:13:27 PM Over the course of the next 3 weeks or so I'll be distributing a fairly significant bonus (equal .25% of the total supply) to all miners who use superninjapool.tk (http://superninjapool.tk). Bonuses will be sent out separately from mining payouts near the end of each week and will be distributed based on a workers accepted shares for EC mining. Happy mining everyone! Nice, this is awesome. Seriously? Which total supply? I expect not the total coins supply, but the coins mined at your pool. Also .25% means probably 0.25%, so with other words you just reduce your fees from 2% to 1.75%. The other pool takes only 1%, I think you need other strategy... Correct, 0.25% BONUS from the TOTAL SUPPLY. I'm not reducing fees. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: voteformeg on March 01, 2016, 09:25:25 PM what is the best way to stake this?? more small amounts or less bigger amounts?
and leave wallet open or open it after a few days? Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Bank_sy on March 01, 2016, 10:12:21 PM what is the best way to stake this?? more small amounts or less bigger amounts? and leave wallet open or open it after a few days? I would say chunks of larger amounts is best, leave it open to stake now because PoS rewards decrease everyday by 10 Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: kelsey on March 01, 2016, 10:57:06 PM QT link down? Website link down?
dead already? Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 01, 2016, 11:03:27 PM QT link down? Website link down? dead already? Not at all. No one has touched the link. It's on mediafire. We looked into it. Mediafire is down. If it doesn't come up soon, we'll host it somewhere else. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 02, 2016, 02:33:37 AM We'll be sending out rewards for joining soon and adding additional promo's! Don't forget to follow and register!
Eclipse Twitter Promotion! In order to star to bring awareness to Eclipse, we are going to be making a large push on Twitter and rewarding our followers who participate! The first promotion will reward users with 15 EC simply for following twitter.com/EclipseCrypto (http://twitter.com/EclipseCrypto) and providing your EC address. Step 1: Sign on to Twitter and follow twitter.com/EclipseCrypto (http://twitter.com/EclipseCrypto) Step 2: Fill out this Google form to provide us your address so we can track activity without annoying you every time: http://goo. gl/forms/ga2gcFsUsO (copy/remove space) Here are the rules: 1: Obviously you've gotta be a follower 2: You have to have at least 50 REAL followers (we'll verify on TwitterAudit) 3: Participate and earn EC That's it. Stay tuned to the thread and we'll have regular promotions to earn additional EC! Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 02, 2016, 03:14:41 AM QT link down? Website link down? dead already? Thanks for the heads up about the site, need to look into why it needed rebooting! Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 02, 2016, 05:38:47 AM Pump and dump? We deleted your post. We have a minimum information entropy requirement. Noob: 100 words of information entropy Jr: 75 words of information entropy etc. We might raise the numbers depending on how many stupid people choose to spurt banal one-liners. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Bank_sy on March 02, 2016, 06:53:36 AM QT link down? Website link down? dead already? Thanks for the heads up about the site, need to look into why it needed rebooting! site is still down in case you don't know Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 02, 2016, 07:22:53 AM QT link down? Website link down? dead already? Thanks for the heads up about the site, need to look into why it needed rebooting! site is still down in case you don't know Mediafire is up. But it doesn't matter. We are going to move hosting the Qts to github when we get the mac wallet built, which should be done within an hour or 2. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: BTCturbo on March 02, 2016, 11:05:37 AM can't download Windows QT from Mediafire ???
Please change this sh*t storage on something better mega.nz as example Good luck, dev! Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: MissCrypto on March 02, 2016, 12:18:02 PM Could we get a block explorer that shows the current coin supply?
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Black Mamba on March 02, 2016, 03:30:49 PM Could we get a block explorer that shows the current coin supply?  { "version" : "v1.0.0.0-g", "mode" : "full", "state" : "Full Node", "protocolversion" : 60017, "walletversion" : 60000, "balance" : "eclipsebalance" : 0.00000000, "newmint" : 0.00000000, "stake" : 0.00000000, "reserve" : 0.00000000, "blocks" : 2206, "timeoffset" : -6, "moneysupply" : 1750763.64185400, "connections" : 5, "datareceived" : "1.38 MB", "datasent" : "2.21 MB", "proxy" : "", "ip" : "xdqsv7a5et6z7sto.onion", "difficulty" : { "proof-of-work" : 10923942.87690015, "proof-of-stake" : 346408.22314906 }, "testnet" : false, "keypoolsize" : 100, "paytxfee" : 0.00000000, "mininput" : 0.00000000, "unlocked_until" : 0, "errors" : "" } Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: MissCrypto on March 02, 2016, 03:38:52 PM Could we get a block explorer that shows the current coin supply? -snip-Yeah I guess it's time for me to start learning about the console. Thank you! Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Black Mamba on March 02, 2016, 03:53:01 PM No problem ;)
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 02, 2016, 04:48:16 PM can't download Windows QT from Mediafire ??? Please change this sh*t storage on something better mega.nz as example Good luck, dev! Okay. We'll put it on something better. We are almost done building the mac wallet. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Bank_sy on March 02, 2016, 05:17:54 PM Could we get a block explorer that shows the current coin supply? -snip-Yeah I guess it's time for me to start learning about the console. Thank you! type getinfo into console and you can see supply Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 02, 2016, 06:06:25 PM can't download Windows QT from Mediafire ??? Please change this sh*t storage on something better mega.nz as example Good luck, dev! Okay. We'll put it on something better. We are almost done building the mac wallet. We still need to move from mediafire, but the Mac wallet is at http://www.mediafire.com/download/wa9i3b2pi8rprdh/Eclipse-Qt.dmg We just finished building it. We'll move from mediafire soon. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 02, 2016, 06:14:46 PM stop launching scam coins. thanks. I love deleting posts from trolls who don't even bother to read. Get a life child. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: BleedCrypto on March 02, 2016, 06:23:41 PM can't download Windows QT from Mediafire ??? Please change this sh*t storage on something better mega.nz as example Good luck, dev! Okay. We'll put it on something better. We are almost done building the mac wallet. We still need to move from mediafire, but the Mac wallet is at http://www.mediafire.com/download/wa9i3b2pi8rprdh/Eclipse-Qt.dmg We just finished building it. We'll move from mediafire soon. awesome. ty for this! Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward▲ Mine Now! Post by: notsofast on March 02, 2016, 06:32:31 PM Hi all, we are hoping a pool operator will decide to add EC soon to increase the ability for everyone to mine more easily. Please continue to check back. You'd have a chance if your broken source on github would compile :) Eclipse is the 12-year-old Indian kid's coin, every time. Broken source, every time. Abandoned before a pool, every time. I should know, the few times I've bothered to mine I get about 75% of the coin supply before every other node leaves and the coin dies. I am not a 12 year old Indian kid and we are working on it. There have only been 105 blocks mined so please stop making assumptions. OK, since this post I've monitored the thread and I'm convinced you aren't Niitassin the 12-year-old Indian kid who serially releases cryptocurrencies called Eclipse or Eclipsecoin and abandons them. The "insert an image of an eclipse here" is the kind of jokey voicing I've come to recognize from his ANN threads. And he was talking about implementing the same library. But he wasn't forking SDC to fix its broken anon and you are, so that's good. I'm mining. Best of luck. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: OSMIUMCOIN on March 02, 2016, 06:40:50 PM Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: stoner19 on March 02, 2016, 06:58:43 PM Don't forget, there will be a bonus issued to miners who use superninjapool.tk (http://superninjapool.tk) over the next few weeks!
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 02, 2016, 07:02:53 PM Hi all, we are hoping a pool operator will decide to add EC soon to increase the ability for everyone to mine more easily. Please continue to check back. You'd have a chance if your broken source on github would compile :) Eclipse is the 12-year-old Indian kid's coin, every time. Broken source, every time. Abandoned before a pool, every time. I should know, the few times I've bothered to mine I get about 75% of the coin supply before every other node leaves and the coin dies. I am not a 12 year old Indian kid and we are working on it. There have only been 105 blocks mined so please stop making assumptions. OK, since this post I've monitored the thread and I'm convinced you aren't Niitassin the 12-year-old Indian kid who serially releases cryptocurrencies called Eclipse or Eclipsecoin and abandons them. The "insert an image of an eclipse here" is the kind of jokey voicing I've come to recognize from his ANN threads. And he was talking about implementing the same library. But he wasn't forking SDC to fix its broken anon and you are, so that's good. I'm mining. Best of luck. Thanks for your support. We really didn't do our background research on the name "eclipse". None of us had heard of a coin called eclipse, so we thought it was a cool name that conveyed "hiding". It just turned out to be a strange coincidence, especially with the jokey voicing, as you say. We hope to build a little steam and get some loose ends like a website, branding, etc., together so this looks like a real coin. Window dressing is the last thing we thought about. We spent all our time prior to launch just making sure we got the crypto right. You'll see that the part we fixed is technically correct according to the latest literature, taking into account best practices. That still can't be said for the fix that shadowcash has planned. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: y_0 on March 02, 2016, 11:25:42 PM Why are you guys spamming the SDC thread and Slack? I don't see any spamming in the thread... I posted the 'fix' to SDCs anonymity bug because it concerns SDC, does it not? What I posted is very relevant to SDC. It's not like I was talking about rainbows and butterflies. SDC looks to be converging on a reasonable fix, but not a recommended one. Originally, they took the scalar hash then multiplied it by the private key and then used it for the scalar multiple of the group generator (two different types of "multiply" here but I didn't invent this convention). Math looks like I = H(K_i)xG That was the very wrong way. Now they take an arbitrary point on the curve by hashing the time stamp, trying to map it to a point, then using that point as a generator. This takes advantage of the fact that all curve points on a prime field can be full generators. The new generator is G* I = H(K_i)xG* There is a relationship between G and G*, namely one is a multiple of the of the other: G = aG* But in this case G* is "unknown log", so G is protected by discrete log hardness. In general, however, it is not good to try to use a generator to hash scalars to a curve. They already learned this lesson once. The fact that $G$ = $aG^*$ is but a little lemma whose proof that I found in the margins of my notebook. I will use the additive notation, since this is what is used for Elliptic Curves, but it's just a convention. Multiplicative notation is just as fine. Lemma *: Let $K$ be a cyclic group of order $n$. Let $G$ be a generator of $K$, i.e. $<G> = K$. Then, $\forall H \in K \exists a \in \{0, \dots, n-1\}$ such that $aG = H$. Proof: Assume $K$ is a cyclic group of order $n$ and $G$ generates $K$ and let $H \in K$. By definition of cyclic groups, since $G$ generates $K$, there exists an integer $a \in \{0, \dots, n-1\}$ such that $aG = H$. -- see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclic_group . Q.E.D. of Lemma *. Now, since the elliptic curve that is secp256k1 is a group whose order is a prime, then it is a cyclic group. This is because all groups that have prime order are cyclic -- for a proof, see : http://planetmath.org/proofthateverygroupofprimeorderiscyclic. For some clarification that secp256k1 has prime order, see : http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/38108/order-of-group-of-points-of-secp256k1 and the answer by Akater which references the documents defining standard curves, for instance SECG -- http://www.secg.org/sec2-v2.pdf -- to which secp256k1 belongs. Therefore, by (*), $G = aG^*$ is true. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Bank_sy on March 03, 2016, 12:48:22 AM I liked your previous work more, just need to make the E a little smaller and maybe bolder. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 03, 2016, 02:29:21 AM Rewards have been sent to everyone who has followed and registered so far! The offer still stands!! Eclipse Twitter Promotion! In order to star to bring awareness to Eclipse, we are going to be making a large push on Twitter and rewarding our followers who participate! The first promotion will reward users with 15 EC simply for following twitter.com/EclipseCrypto (http://twitter.com/EclipseCrypto) and providing your EC address. Step 1: Sign on to Twitter and follow twitter.com/EclipseCrypto (http://twitter.com/EclipseCrypto) Step 2: Fill out this Google form to provide us your address so we can track activity without annoying you every time: http://goo. gl/forms/ga2gcFsUsO (copy/remove space) Here are the rules: 1: Obviously you've gotta be a follower 2: You have to have at least 50 REAL followers (we'll verify on TwitterAudit) 3: Participate and earn EC That's it. Stay tuned to the thread and we'll have regular promotions to earn additional EC! Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Bank_sy on March 03, 2016, 03:49:20 AM Why are you guys spamming the SDC thread and Slack? I don't see any spamming in the thread... I posted the 'fix' to SDCs anonymity bug because it concerns SDC, does it not? What I posted is very relevant to SDC. It's not like I was talking about rainbows and butterflies. SDC looks to be converging on a reasonable fix, but not a recommended one. Originally, they took the scalar hash then multiplied it by the private key and then used it for the scalar multiple of the group generator (two different types of "multiply" here but I didn't invent this convention). Math looks like I = H(K_i)xG That was the very wrong way. Now they take an arbitrary point on the curve by hashing the time stamp, trying to map it to a point, then using that point as a generator. This takes advantage of the fact that all curve points on a prime field can be full generators. The new generator is G* I = H(K_i)xG* There is a relationship between G and G*, namely one is a multiple of the of the other: G = aG* But in this case G* is "unknown log", so G is protected by discrete log hardness. In general, however, it is not good to try to use a generator to hash scalars to a curve. They already learned this lesson once. The fact that $G$ = $aG^*$ is but a little lemma whose proof that I found in the margins of my notebook. I will use the additive notation, since this is what is used for Elliptic Curves, but it's just a convention. Multiplicative notation is just as fine. Lemma *: Let $K$ be a cyclic group of order $n$. Let $G$ be a generator of $K$, i.e. $<G> = K$. Then, $\forall H \in K \exists a \in \{0, \dots, n-1\}$ such that $aG = H$. Proof: Assume $K$ is a cyclic group of order $n$ and $G$ generates $K$ and let $H \in K$. By definition of cyclic groups, since $G$ generates $K$, there exists an integer $a \in \{0, \dots, n-1\}$ such that $aG = H$. -- see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclic_group . Q.E.D. of Lemma *. Now, since the elliptic curve that is secp256k1 is a group whose order is a prime, then it is a cyclic group. This is because all groups that have prime order are cyclic -- for a proof, see : http://planetmath.org/proofthateverygroupofprimeorderiscyclic. For some clarification that secp256k1 has prime order, see : http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/38108/order-of-group-of-points-of-secp256k1 and the answer by Akater which references the documents defining standard curves, for instance SECG -- http://www.secg.org/sec2-v2.pdf -- to which secp256k1 belongs. Therefore, by (*), $G = aG^*$ is true. I'm a bit lost, are you saying that SDC testnet fix is valid? Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 03, 2016, 04:01:05 AM Why are you guys spamming the SDC thread and Slack? I don't see any spamming in the thread... I posted the 'fix' to SDCs anonymity bug because it concerns SDC, does it not? What I posted is very relevant to SDC. It's not like I was talking about rainbows and butterflies. SDC looks to be converging on a reasonable fix, but not a recommended one. Originally, they took the scalar hash then multiplied it by the private key and then used it for the scalar multiple of the group generator (two different types of "multiply" here but I didn't invent this convention). Math looks like I = H(K_i)xG That was the very wrong way. Now they take an arbitrary point on the curve by hashing the time stamp, trying to map it to a point, then using that point as a generator. This takes advantage of the fact that all curve points on a prime field can be full generators. The new generator is G* I = H(K_i)xG* There is a relationship between G and G*, namely one is a multiple of the of the other: G = aG* But in this case G* is "unknown log", so G is protected by discrete log hardness. In general, however, it is not good to try to use a generator to hash scalars to a curve. They already learned this lesson once. The fact that $G$ = $aG^*$ is but a little lemma whose proof that I found in the margins of my notebook. I will use the additive notation, since this is what is used for Elliptic Curves, but it's just a convention. Multiplicative notation is just as fine. Lemma *: Let $K$ be a cyclic group of order $n$. Let $G$ be a generator of $K$, i.e. $<G> = K$. Then, $\forall H \in K \exists a \in \{0, \dots, n-1\}$ such that $aG = H$. Proof: Assume $K$ is a cyclic group of order $n$ and $G$ generates $K$ and let $H \in K$. By definition of cyclic groups, since $G$ generates $K$, there exists an integer $a \in \{0, \dots, n-1\}$ such that $aG = H$. -- see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclic_group . Q.E.D. of Lemma *. Now, since the elliptic curve that is secp256k1 is a group whose order is a prime, then it is a cyclic group. This is because all groups that have prime order are cyclic -- for a proof, see : http://planetmath.org/proofthateverygroupofprimeorderiscyclic. For some clarification that secp256k1 has prime order, see : http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/38108/order-of-group-of-points-of-secp256k1 and the answer by Akater which references the documents defining standard curves, for instance SECG -- http://www.secg.org/sec2-v2.pdf -- to which secp256k1 belongs. Therefore, by (*), $G = aG^*$ is true. I'm a bit lost, are you saying that SDC testnet fix is valid? That's not the topic of that math. The other dev is just clarifying mathematically where I asserted the relationship G = aG*, and showing how it is valid. That was actually a response to a post on the SDC thread where someone without much math knowledge was questioning what I said. You can't respond to them in their thread or you will get deleted. So our other dev decided just to do it here. He proved the relationship holds for all group elements G* over a prime field because G is a generator for the group. Our other dev is a real precise mathy-type who doesn't let anything go in the way of math reasoning. Oh, and to answer your question, I said "G is protected by discrete log hardness". So the exploit that de-anoned their chain in the first place is now protected by a cryptographically hard problem. However, I also observed that the way they are doing it (maybe to save CPU cycles) is not advisable in general. I can show a couple of reasons why. Here's essentially where they pick their generator in their current plan: Code: uint256 hash = Hash(Params().pszTimestamp, Params().pszTimestamp + strlen(Params().pszTimestamp)); What's this do? It takes the hash of the same time stamp string used for the genesis hash and will use it to map to a generator. Then this generator is used for every ring signature in the entire block chain. Now, if, for some reason anyone ever solves a for G = aG* Then the whole system comes crashing down. Every signature will be deanoned. Period. You may be thinking that the discrete log problem holds here and you would be right. But, on the most practical level it is a single point of failure. Of lesser potential issue is why did they pick that timestamp? There are zillions of seemingly obvious strings and numbers that could be used to seed the generator. Why not the name of the coin, why not "Satoshi Nakamora", why not "Alan Turing", etc. etc? Admittedly this second potential for nefarious intent is far-fetched, but it exists nonetheless, and is a valid cyptographic concern because it leaves some wiggle room that compromises the "rigidity" of the crypto system. Our system has neither this single point of failure nor arbitrary parameter. I'll further add that this seemingly simple solution used by shadowcash undoubtedly occurred to the creators of cryptonote. Why didn't the cryptonote devs use this solution of a generator with "unknown" log? Why would they not want to make their system save CPU cycles and further find the group point in constant time? Why did they use a curve where they could solve the root (or find a residue for the root they found)? These are rhetorical questions, but very important to ask. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 03, 2016, 07:58:01 AM Could we get a block explorer that shows the current coin supply? Yes. We are working on all this. We are still nailing down the following: 1. Finalize branding, logos, etc., pay the bounty 2. Add enough Website Content to satisfy exchanges 3. Block explorer (probably fairglu's) -- this much of the list will get us on yobit and/or bleutrade 4. We need to decide on where to host the Qt wallets so we can track downloads (not mediafire) 5. Finalize the medium-term development road map 6. Get the whitepaper finished (post bleutrade/yobit, pre bittrex) It seems like a straightforward list, but we have multiple devs and we have to reach consensus about every little thing. Once we finalize all decisions, we should proceed through the list pretty fast, although we will pace 4 & 5 to ensure we spend enough time at the smaller exchanges before we move to the larger. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: chrisvl on March 03, 2016, 08:30:01 AM Could we get a block explorer that shows the current coin supply? Yes. We are working on all this. We are still nailing down the following: 1. Finalize branding, logos, etc., pay the bounty 2. Add enough Website Content to satisfy exchanges 3. Block explorer (probably fairglu's) -- this much of the list will get us on yobit and/or bleutrade 4. We need to decide on where to host the Qt wallets so we can track downloads (not mediafire) 5. Finalize the medium-term development road map 6. Get the whitepaper finished (post bleutrade/yobit, pre bittrex) It seems like a straightforward list, but we have multiple devs and we have to reach consensus about every little thing. Once we finalize all decisions, we should proceed through the list pretty fast, although we will pace 4 & 5 to ensure we spend enough time at the smaller exchanges before we move to the larger. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Bank_sy on March 03, 2016, 04:17:53 PM Could we get a block explorer that shows the current coin supply? Yes. We are working on all this. We are still nailing down the following: 1. Finalize branding, logos, etc., pay the bounty 2. Add enough Website Content to satisfy exchanges 3. Block explorer (probably fairglu's) -- this much of the list will get us on yobit and/or bleutrade 4. We need to decide on where to host the Qt wallets so we can track downloads (not mediafire) 5. Finalize the medium-term development road map 6. Get the whitepaper finished (post bleutrade/yobit, pre bittrex) It seems like a straightforward list, but we have multiple devs and we have to reach consensus about every little thing. Once we finalize all decisions, we should proceed through the list pretty fast, although we will pace 4 & 5 to ensure we spend enough time at the smaller exchanges before we move to the larger. sounds good but 3,4,5,6 are pretty much a parts of 2 Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 03, 2016, 05:07:56 PM Could we get a block explorer that shows the current coin supply? Yes. We are working on all this. We are still nailing down the following: 1. Finalize branding, logos, etc., pay the bounty 2. Add enough Website Content to satisfy exchanges 3. Block explorer (probably fairglu's) -- this much of the list will get us on yobit and/or bleutrade 4. We need to decide on where to host the Qt wallets so we can track downloads (not mediafire) 5. Finalize the medium-term development road map 6. Get the whitepaper finished (post bleutrade/yobit, pre bittrex) It seems like a straightforward list, but we have multiple devs and we have to reach consensus about every little thing. Once we finalize all decisions, we should proceed through the list pretty fast, although we will pace 4 & 5 to ensure we spend enough time at the smaller exchanges before we move to the larger. sounds good but 3,4,5,6 are pretty much a parts of 2 Exchanges don't require a roadmap or whitepaper. Is there more you think we should be doing? We're more than happy to accept help if you feel this isn't suitable in the short term. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Akbarkoe on March 03, 2016, 05:56:45 PM i have a problem if i open the wallet QT.
ERROR LOADING BLKINDEX.DAT http://i63.tinypic.com/238jur.jpg How to fix it? Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: NextGenCrypto on March 03, 2016, 05:58:25 PM i have a problem if i open the wallet QT. ERROR LOADING BLKINDEX.DAT http://i63.tinypic.com/238jur.jpg How to fix it? I think you just have to try to open it again. Common error with Qt's. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Akbarkoe on March 03, 2016, 06:02:09 PM i have a problem if i open the wallet QT. ERROR LOADING BLKINDEX.DAT http://i63.tinypic.com/238jur.jpg How to fix it? I think you just have to try to open it again. Common error with Qt's. I open that again still the same I dont know how to fix it? any problem with the wallet QT? Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: NextGenCrypto on March 03, 2016, 06:03:11 PM i have a problem if i open the wallet QT. ERROR LOADING BLKINDEX.DAT http://i63.tinypic.com/238jur.jpg How to fix it? I think you just have to try to open it again. Common error with Qt's. I open that again still the same I dont know how to fix it? any problem with the wallet QT? I haven't had any issues. Try deleting everything except your wallet.dat from your eclipsecrypto roaming folder and restart. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 03, 2016, 06:11:01 PM Could we get a block explorer that shows the current coin supply? Yes. We are working on all this. We are still nailing down the following: 1. Finalize branding, logos, etc., pay the bounty 2. Add enough Website Content to satisfy exchanges 3. Block explorer (probably fairglu's) -- this much of the list will get us on yobit and/or bleutrade 4. We need to decide on where to host the Qt wallets so we can track downloads (not mediafire) 5. Finalize the medium-term development road map 6. Get the whitepaper finished (post bleutrade/yobit, pre bittrex) It seems like a straightforward list, but we have multiple devs and we have to reach consensus about every little thing. Once we finalize all decisions, we should proceed through the list pretty fast, although we will pace 4 & 5 to ensure we spend enough time at the smaller exchanges before we move to the larger. sounds good but 3,4,5,6 are pretty much a parts of 2 We are going to go through the process in due time. First you get on small exchanges for price discovery and distribution. Then you go on big exchanges. There is no rush here. Miners can get out early at a smaller exchange with some good profit. And believers can hold for bigger exchanges or implementation of roadmap features. We won't put the cart in front of the horse. We are going to put some website content up within the day. For now, the community should start to try to help us get on yobit or bleutrade. In the meantime, here is a block explorer with rich list: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/ Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Bank_sy on March 03, 2016, 06:17:16 PM Could we get a block explorer that shows the current coin supply? Yes. We are working on all this. We are still nailing down the following: 1. Finalize branding, logos, etc., pay the bounty 2. Add enough Website Content to satisfy exchanges 3. Block explorer (probably fairglu's) -- this much of the list will get us on yobit and/or bleutrade 4. We need to decide on where to host the Qt wallets so we can track downloads (not mediafire) 5. Finalize the medium-term development road map 6. Get the whitepaper finished (post bleutrade/yobit, pre bittrex) It seems like a straightforward list, but we have multiple devs and we have to reach consensus about every little thing. Once we finalize all decisions, we should proceed through the list pretty fast, although we will pace 4 & 5 to ensure we spend enough time at the smaller exchanges before we move to the larger. sounds good but 3,4,5,6 are pretty much a parts of 2 We are going to go through the process in due time. First you get on small exchanges for price discovery and distribution. Then you go on big exchanges. There is no rush here. Miners can get out early at a smaller exchange with some good profit. And believers can hold for bigger exchanges or implementation of roadmap features. We won't put the cart in front of the horse. We are going to put some website content up within the day. For now, the community should start to try to help us get on yobit or bleutrade. In the meantime, here is a block explorer with rich list: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/ Did not mean to be rude, just that for coins these days block explorer, road map, graphics are just standard things. There is no rush to get on bigger exchanges and I agree with smaller exchanges first then later getting on to larger ones. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: BleedCrypto on March 03, 2016, 07:24:17 PM Could we get a block explorer that shows the current coin supply? Yes. We are working on all this. We are still nailing down the following: 1. Finalize branding, logos, etc., pay the bounty 2. Add enough Website Content to satisfy exchanges 3. Block explorer (probably fairglu's) -- this much of the list will get us on yobit and/or bleutrade 4. We need to decide on where to host the Qt wallets so we can track downloads (not mediafire) 5. Finalize the medium-term development road map 6. Get the whitepaper finished (post bleutrade/yobit, pre bittrex) It seems like a straightforward list, but we have multiple devs and we have to reach consensus about every little thing. Once we finalize all decisions, we should proceed through the list pretty fast, although we will pace 4 & 5 to ensure we spend enough time at the smaller exchanges before we move to the larger. sounds good but 3,4,5,6 are pretty much a parts of 2 We are going to go through the process in due time. First you get on small exchanges for price discovery and distribution. Then you go on big exchanges. There is no rush here. Miners can get out early at a smaller exchange with some good profit. And believers can hold for bigger exchanges or implementation of roadmap features. We won't put the cart in front of the horse. We are going to put some website content up within the day. For now, the community should start to try to help us get on yobit or bleutrade. In the meantime, here is a block explorer with rich list: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/ nice. one step closer to exchanging. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Bank_sy on March 03, 2016, 07:33:55 PM Could we get a block explorer that shows the current coin supply? Yes. We are working on all this. We are still nailing down the following: 1. Finalize branding, logos, etc., pay the bounty 2. Add enough Website Content to satisfy exchanges 3. Block explorer (probably fairglu's) -- this much of the list will get us on yobit and/or bleutrade 4. We need to decide on where to host the Qt wallets so we can track downloads (not mediafire) 5. Finalize the medium-term development road map 6. Get the whitepaper finished (post bleutrade/yobit, pre bittrex) It seems like a straightforward list, but we have multiple devs and we have to reach consensus about every little thing. Once we finalize all decisions, we should proceed through the list pretty fast, although we will pace 4 & 5 to ensure we spend enough time at the smaller exchanges before we move to the larger. sounds good but 3,4,5,6 are pretty much a parts of 2 We are going to go through the process in due time. First you get on small exchanges for price discovery and distribution. Then you go on big exchanges. There is no rush here. Miners can get out early at a smaller exchange with some good profit. And believers can hold for bigger exchanges or implementation of roadmap features. We won't put the cart in front of the horse. We are going to put some website content up within the day. For now, the community should start to try to help us get on yobit or bleutrade. In the meantime, here is a block explorer with rich list: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/ nice. one step closer to exchanging. well shit, one address has 44% of total supply.... This is either going to be a crazy pump or already a dead coin.... Doesn't help that they are staking constantly as well... :-X Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: butragenjo on March 03, 2016, 08:25:33 PM Any exchange for that crypto?
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Bank_sy on March 03, 2016, 08:40:43 PM Any exchange for that crypto? none yet... added to voting list for SafeCex https://safecex.com/coin/add?q=ec Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Black Mamba on March 03, 2016, 08:47:52 PM Any exchange for that crypto? none yet... added to voting list for SafeCex https://safecex.com/coin/add?q=ec An exchange would be a good plan. 8) Because the block reward becomes less and less. The same applies to POS reward. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Bank_sy on March 03, 2016, 11:19:04 PM If possible I would like to see some sort of voting/proposal mechanism for EC like DNET has.
It encourages community participation and would require certain minimum investment to influence direction of EC. If you insert a masternode system of some sort, you can split up PoS rewards (voting rights is good enough too). Also I would like to see 10 EC PoS inflation decrease to <5 over time. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 04, 2016, 12:27:12 AM If possible I would like to see some sort of voting/proposal mechanism for EC like DNET has. It encourages community participation and would require certain minimum investment to influence direction of EC. If you insert a masternode system of some sort, you can split up PoS rewards (voting rights is good enough too). Also I would like to see 10 EC PoS inflation decrease to <5 over time. There isn't any reason to reduce the 10 EC inflation rate. Over time, the fixed reward will represent less and less inflation. I don't anticipate anyone on the team embracing masternodes. We don't see a use for them unless someone can make a very compelling case. It's not clear how a community is going to implement anything it votes for. How do you see that working? Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: ttookk on March 04, 2016, 01:16:45 AM Is there a minimum amount, at which staking becomes possible?Also, it seems that the wallet weight does not change?
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 04, 2016, 05:03:13 AM Is there a minimum amount, at which staking becomes possible?Also, it seems that the wallet weight does not change? There is a minimum amount, but you would probably never actually stake with it. You could stake with 1 EC. On another topic, we have moved the downloads to bitbucket: Windows: https://bitbucket.org/EclipseCrypto/eclipse-releases/raw/9bd27571239dcd77a44e6b3dd96eea5673c1cad0/Eclipse-Qt-1.0.0.zip Mac: https://bitbucket.org/EclipseCrypto/eclipse-releases/raw/9bd27571239dcd77a44e6b3dd96eea5673c1cad0/Eclipse-Qt.dmg Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Black Mamba on March 04, 2016, 05:15:00 AM Hi Dev,
HiPoS Reward: 300 Corona, decreasing by 10/day to 20 Corona Post-HiPoS Reward: 10 Corona What are Corona's? Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 04, 2016, 06:34:34 AM Hi Dev, HiPoS Reward: 300 Corona, decreasing by 10/day to 20 Corona Post-HiPoS Reward: 10 Corona What are Corona's? Eclipse has two currencies: coronas and eclipse. A corona the clear currency. Eclipse is the dark currency, protected by cryptographic ring signatures. Somewhere in cyberspace you can read "A corona (Latin, 'crown') is an aura of plasma that surrounds the sun and other celestial bodies. The Sun's corona extends millions of kilometres into space and is most easily seen during a total solar eclipse, but it is also observable with a coronagraph". In other words, it's the part you see. "Corona" or "Crown" or similar is used as the name of many currencies, referring of course to the crown of a monarch. The crown of a monarch is meant to represent halo in western cultures, which itself can be traced to representing the corona of the sun. And we come full circle with the etymology and symbolism. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Bank_sy on March 04, 2016, 07:18:56 AM If possible I would like to see some sort of voting/proposal mechanism for EC like DNET has. It encourages community participation and would require certain minimum investment to influence direction of EC. If you insert a masternode system of some sort, you can split up PoS rewards (voting rights is good enough too). Also I would like to see 10 EC PoS inflation decrease to <5 over time. There isn't any reason to reduce the 10 EC inflation rate. Over time, the fixed reward will represent less and less inflation. I don't anticipate anyone on the team embracing masternodes. We don't see a use for them unless someone can make a very compelling case. It's not clear how a community is going to implement anything it votes for. How do you see that working? the 10 EC inflation rate can be discussed later I think. The masternode idea was more to have a cut off for being able to vote (owning at least x EC = 1 vote) like how DNET is doing. They do not have to give rewards, I just think the voting part can be useful. The community might not be able to implement what they vote for but this way you will have a way to see what people who are invested into EC will think. You guys want to add something to EC but aren't sure? Then you submit proposal/vote and see what EC owners think. If you look at DNET, it encourages community participation. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: soSYC on March 04, 2016, 07:43:25 AM Could we get a block explorer that shows the current coin supply? Yes. We are working on all this. We are still nailing down the following: 1. Finalize branding, logos, etc., pay the bounty 2. Add enough Website Content to satisfy exchanges 3. Block explorer (probably fairglu's) -- this much of the list will get us on yobit and/or bleutrade 4. We need to decide on where to host the Qt wallets so we can track downloads (not mediafire) 5. Finalize the medium-term development road map 6. Get the whitepaper finished (post bleutrade/yobit, pre bittrex) It seems like a straightforward list, but we have multiple devs and we have to reach consensus about every little thing. Once we finalize all decisions, we should proceed through the list pretty fast, although we will pace 4 & 5 to ensure we spend enough time at the smaller exchanges before we move to the larger. sounds good but 3,4,5,6 are pretty much a parts of 2 We are going to go through the process in due time. First you get on small exchanges for price discovery and distribution. Then you go on big exchanges. There is no rush here. Miners can get out early at a smaller exchange with some good profit. And believers can hold for bigger exchanges or implementation of roadmap features. We won't put the cart in front of the horse. We are going to put some website content up within the day. For now, the community should start to try to help us get on yobit or bleutrade. In the meantime, here is a block explorer with rich list: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/ nice. one step closer to exchanging. well shit, one address has 44% of total supply.... This is either going to be a crazy pump or already a dead coin.... Doesn't help that they are staking constantly as well... :-X 85% of the supply is claimed, and one wallet has 44%. Who thought 2.1 million max in a couple weeks would be a good idea? Great concept, but hair-brained approach. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 04, 2016, 07:50:45 AM Could we get a block explorer that shows the current coin supply? Yes. We are working on all this. We are still nailing down the following: 1. Finalize branding, logos, etc., pay the bounty 2. Add enough Website Content to satisfy exchanges 3. Block explorer (probably fairglu's) -- this much of the list will get us on yobit and/or bleutrade 4. We need to decide on where to host the Qt wallets so we can track downloads (not mediafire) 5. Finalize the medium-term development road map 6. Get the whitepaper finished (post bleutrade/yobit, pre bittrex) It seems like a straightforward list, but we have multiple devs and we have to reach consensus about every little thing. Once we finalize all decisions, we should proceed through the list pretty fast, although we will pace 4 & 5 to ensure we spend enough time at the smaller exchanges before we move to the larger. sounds good but 3,4,5,6 are pretty much a parts of 2 We are going to go through the process in due time. First you get on small exchanges for price discovery and distribution. Then you go on big exchanges. There is no rush here. Miners can get out early at a smaller exchange with some good profit. And believers can hold for bigger exchanges or implementation of roadmap features. We won't put the cart in front of the horse. We are going to put some website content up within the day. For now, the community should start to try to help us get on yobit or bleutrade. In the meantime, here is a block explorer with rich list: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/ nice. one step closer to exchanging. well shit, one address has 44% of total supply.... This is either going to be a crazy pump or already a dead coin.... Doesn't help that they are staking constantly as well... :-X 85% of the supply is claimed, and one wallet has 44%. Who thought 2.1 million max in a couple weeks would be a good idea? Great concept, but hair-brained approach. A couple of years ago, all coins were distributed like this and there would be 400 miners on a coin in 30 minutes. Nowadays, you can't get 4 miners before two days go by. I guess times have changed. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: ocminer on March 04, 2016, 07:54:04 AM Could we get a block explorer that shows the current coin supply? Yes. We are working on all this. We are still nailing down the following: 1. Finalize branding, logos, etc., pay the bounty 2. Add enough Website Content to satisfy exchanges 3. Block explorer (probably fairglu's) -- this much of the list will get us on yobit and/or bleutrade 4. We need to decide on where to host the Qt wallets so we can track downloads (not mediafire) 5. Finalize the medium-term development road map 6. Get the whitepaper finished (post bleutrade/yobit, pre bittrex) It seems like a straightforward list, but we have multiple devs and we have to reach consensus about every little thing. Once we finalize all decisions, we should proceed through the list pretty fast, although we will pace 4 & 5 to ensure we spend enough time at the smaller exchanges before we move to the larger. sounds good but 3,4,5,6 are pretty much a parts of 2 We are going to go through the process in due time. First you get on small exchanges for price discovery and distribution. Then you go on big exchanges. There is no rush here. Miners can get out early at a smaller exchange with some good profit. And believers can hold for bigger exchanges or implementation of roadmap features. We won't put the cart in front of the horse. We are going to put some website content up within the day. For now, the community should start to try to help us get on yobit or bleutrade. In the meantime, here is a block explorer with rich list: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/ nice. one step closer to exchanging. well shit, one address has 44% of total supply.... This is either going to be a crazy pump or already a dead coin.... Doesn't help that they are staking constantly as well... :-X 85% of the supply is claimed, and one wallet has 44%. Who thought 2.1 million max in a couple weeks would be a good idea? Great concept, but hair-brained approach. A couple of years ago, all coins were distributed like this and there would be 400 miners on a coin in 30 minutes. Nowadays, you can't get 4 miners before two days go by. I guess times have changed. Sorry to say but a year ago, Sources of a release on github could be compiled without a fuss and without multiple tries immediately... ;) Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 04, 2016, 08:31:22 AM Sorry to say but a year ago, Sources of a release on github could be compiled without a fuss and without multiple tries immediately... ;) That's because they were all pure clone coins. Pure clone coins build out of the box. We have no argument with you, though. I'd say our mistake was that we launched something that is not a clone coin as if it were a clone coin, and that didn't leave much room for error. But once built, you can't argue that this puppy isn't a great coin for mining, staking, and its intended functionality. On another topic, what are people's thoughts on this "HTML5 wallet" that Eclipse presently uses? Seriously, I thought it would be cool but I find that I'm not so fond of it. What does everyone think? Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Akbarkoe on March 04, 2016, 02:12:32 PM My problem is not solved
How to fix it? I download new wallet, but still the same http://i67.tinypic.com/208wqci.jpg Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: danonthehill on March 04, 2016, 03:50:52 PM Sorry guys, I will no longer be mining this. 44% instamined +HIPOS. Distribution is fucked.
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 04, 2016, 03:53:02 PM My problem is not solved How to fix it? I download new wallet, but still the same http://i67.tinypic.com/208wqci.jpg Just try twice. This happens to all Qts. You have to restart it once. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: chrisvl on March 04, 2016, 05:16:30 PM i sell eclipse for bitcoins and altcoins if anyone is intrest pm me
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: chrisvl on March 04, 2016, 05:24:17 PM Sorry guys, I will no longer be mining this. 44% instamined +HIPOS. Distribution is fucked. I got 6500 coins trying to stake for 48h and no stake and it looks like i never gonna stake.It seems like staking is reserved for top 10 and yes distribution is fucked. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: ttookk on March 04, 2016, 05:58:35 PM Sorry guys, I will no longer be mining this. 44% instamined +HIPOS. Distribution is fucked. I got 6500 coins trying to stake for 48h and no stake and it looks like i never gonna stake.It seems like staking is reserved for top 10 and yes distribution is fucked. This around 3200 EC wallet staked yesterday: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/address.dws?286.htm However, I'm a little concerned by the distribution as well. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Kushedout on March 04, 2016, 08:04:59 PM I am willing to buy 50K EC for .15btc, up to 1 BTC worth. PM me if interested. Open to negotiation.
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Bank_sy on March 04, 2016, 08:46:42 PM I am willing to buy 50K EC for .15btc, up to 1 BTC worth. PM me if interested. Open to negotiation. 50k for 0.15 BTC? I'm willing to pay at least 0.2 BTC Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 05, 2016, 01:34:35 AM A new promotion with a 5 EC bounty has been posted on twitter! https://twitter.com/EclipseCrypto/status/705929208732581888 (https://twitter.com/EclipseCrypto/status/705929208732581888) Eclipse Twitter Promotion! In order to star to bring awareness to Eclipse, we are going to be making a large push on Twitter and rewarding our followers who participate! The first promotion will reward users with 15 EC simply for following twitter.com/EclipseCrypto (http://twitter.com/EclipseCrypto) and providing your EC address. Step 1: Sign on to Twitter and follow twitter.com/EclipseCrypto (http://twitter.com/EclipseCrypto) Step 2: Fill out this Google form to provide us your address so we can track activity without annoying you every time: http://goo. gl/forms/ga2gcFsUsO (copy/remove space) Here are the rules: 1: Obviously you've gotta be a follower 2: You have to have at least 50 REAL followers (we'll verify on TwitterAudit) 3: Participate and earn EC That's it. Stay tuned to the thread and we'll have regular promotions to earn additional EC! Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: NextGenCrypto on March 05, 2016, 05:11:42 AM Looking for 25k EC for .15 BTC OBO
Let's do this. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: voteformeg on March 05, 2016, 10:07:18 AM Looking for 25k EC for .15 BTC OBO Let's do this. can sell 20 K for 0.2 btc Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: wasref on March 05, 2016, 10:26:05 AM buying EC coins too, pm me with your offer
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: complexring on March 05, 2016, 04:24:53 PM Also looking to buy. I'd buy .2 btc worth for ~40k. PM with your best offers.
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: chrisvl on March 05, 2016, 07:16:57 PM 1000 coins for sell 0.00025 btc per coin altcoins accepted
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: lockepi on March 06, 2016, 12:27:47 AM yobit not adding this
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: NextGenCrypto on March 06, 2016, 12:45:21 AM Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: kimochidesh on March 06, 2016, 08:09:25 AM dead coin ;D
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Black Mamba on March 06, 2016, 10:29:56 AM Hello People ,
Retweet please https://twitter.com/crypto_addicted/status/706426210541309952 Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: voteformeg on March 06, 2016, 12:03:14 PM Selling 10K for 0.25 btc ( 0.000025 /coin ) should be the real price for this EC i guess , PM if intrested
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: voteformeg on March 06, 2016, 12:14:44 PM Hello People , Retweet please https://twitter.com/crypto_addicted/status/706426210541309952 retweeted Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: bitcoinwonders010 on March 06, 2016, 01:50:18 PM 9000 coins for 0.00001(0.09btc)
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: buchaski on March 06, 2016, 09:29:23 PM looking to buy a large amount name your price in pm
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: kimochidesh on March 06, 2016, 09:59:38 PM we need exchanger :)
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: magaura on March 06, 2016, 10:07:36 PM PM me if you want to sell some..
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: chrisvl on March 06, 2016, 11:59:49 PM I sell 2000 coins for 0.027 btc
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Bank_sy on March 07, 2016, 02:24:55 AM I am willing to buy some coins too, PM if any wants to sell to me
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: wasref on March 07, 2016, 02:41:57 AM pm me buying coins
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 07, 2016, 04:40:02 AM we need exchanger :) Yes we do. We are doing everything we can to get on one. In case anyone is wondering if we are working on anything, we are. But we won't have any updates until we get on an exchange. We have approached every exchange. The community has to get involved. We only need to be on one for a few days to establish a price point, and then we will start to make development plans public and give updates. The reason is because we don't want to have a roadmap that will artificially raise the price and hurt distribution. We want to spend some time on a small exchange to let miners take reasonable profits while bringing more people into the community. Right now, the logical place to focus is on yobit. Please submit requests there if you haven't already. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Black Mamba on March 07, 2016, 05:04:44 AM Hello People , Retweet please https://twitter.com/crypto_addicted/status/706426210541309952 retweeted Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Topknotbam on March 07, 2016, 07:10:25 AM Hey. Give me a node?
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: ocminer on March 07, 2016, 07:15:23 AM Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 07, 2016, 07:30:54 AM It looks like SDC went live with our solution for hashToEC.
https://i.imgur.com/S9Q3t7l.png They switched from creating a new generator, discussed here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378922.msg14079014#msg14079014 What's this mean? We are the leaders kids. This is the heart of our algo, pushed publicly 9 days ago: Code: for (j = 0; j < k; ++j) This is shadowcash's pushed to their repo 3 days ago: Code: while(!EC_POINT_set_compressed_coordinates_GFp(ecGrp, ptRet, bnTmp, 0, bnCtx) && count < 100) This is their commit after they read our critique of their method: https://github.com/shadowproject/shadow/commit/106afc6975cf41090ca2a0c47877de0cc8a16f1a Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: proletariat on March 07, 2016, 08:07:07 AM Want to buy a few coins. PM me if interested. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: cryptohunter on March 07, 2016, 08:16:54 AM 9000 coins for 0.00001(0.09btc) will buy 5000 for 0.05 Pm me or post here anyone who is selling for this rate Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: chrisvl on March 07, 2016, 08:49:00 AM i sell 700 eclipse for 0,011 btc
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: stoner19 on March 07, 2016, 04:45:39 PM the 1st bonus round to miners at superninjapool.tk (http://superninjapool.tk) has been sent out. The bonus payout is calculated based on each miner's submitted shares as a percentage of all shares submitted through the timeframe for this bonus round (from day 1 on superninjapool.tk (http://superninjapool.tk) until today) and paid out accordingly.
All addresses that have received the bonus are listed here: Code: EXai5RuqUZmn3ooj5qBvVRDetUL3B8atPY This is the 1st of 3 bonuses to be paid. Next one will be issued roughly this coming weekend. PoW is over. I will be sending out the remaining bonuses shortly. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: voteformeg on March 07, 2016, 04:50:01 PM This is the 1st of 3 bonuses to be paid. Next one will be issued roughly this coming weekend.
tanx did not know i was in for a bonus , great Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: stoner19 on March 07, 2016, 04:52:54 PM Actually, it appears that we have just reached the end of the PoW phase, so I'll be compiling the remainder of the bonuses to be paid out and send them shortly. The list of addresses to received a bonus will remain unchanged from the above list.
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: cryptohunter on March 07, 2016, 05:36:36 PM i sell 700 eclipse for 0,011 btc how many you have total? PM me the details. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Bank_sy on March 07, 2016, 05:38:17 PM It looks like SDC went live with our solution for hashToEC. https://i.imgur.com/S9Q3t7l.png They switched from creating a new generator, discussed here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378922.msg14079014#msg14079014 What's this mean? We are the leaders kids. This is the heart of our algo, pushed publicly 9 days ago: Code: for (j = 0; j < k; ++j) This is shadowcash's pushed to their repo 3 days ago: Code: while(!EC_POINT_set_compressed_coordinates_GFp(ecGrp, ptRet, bnTmp, 0, bnCtx) && count < 100) This is their commit after they read our critique of their method: https://github.com/shadowproject/shadow/commit/106afc6975cf41090ca2a0c47877de0cc8a16f1a good job implementing the fix before SDC! will be watching what happens next... Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: stoner19 on March 07, 2016, 08:36:02 PM Last of the miner bonuses sent out. Thanks to those who used superninjapool.tk (http://superninjapool.tk)!
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: NextGenCrypto on March 07, 2016, 09:22:51 PM Last of the miner bonuses sent out. Thanks to those who used superninjapool.tk (http://superninjapool.tk)! Thanks for getting your pool setup for us to mine on stoner19. :thumbsup: Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: bangomatic on March 07, 2016, 11:21:59 PM It looks like SDC went live with our solution for hashToEC. https://i.imgur.com/S9Q3t7l.png They switched from creating a new generator, discussed here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378922.msg14079014#msg14079014 What's this mean? We are the leaders kids. This is the heart of our algo, pushed publicly 9 days ago: Code: for (j = 0; j < k; ++j) This is shadowcash's pushed to their repo 3 days ago: Code: while(!EC_POINT_set_compressed_coordinates_GFp(ecGrp, ptRet, bnTmp, 0, bnCtx) && count < 100) This is their commit after they read our critique of their method: https://github.com/shadowproject/shadow/commit/106afc6975cf41090ca2a0c47877de0cc8a16f1a why you hatin on shadowcash? isnt your coin just a shadowcash clone? Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: BleedCrypto on March 08, 2016, 02:09:14 AM It looks like SDC went live with our solution for hashToEC. https://i.imgur.com/S9Q3t7l.png They switched from creating a new generator, discussed here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378922.msg14079014#msg14079014 What's this mean? We are the leaders kids. This is the heart of our algo, pushed publicly 9 days ago: Code: for (j = 0; j < k; ++j) This is shadowcash's pushed to their repo 3 days ago: Code: while(!EC_POINT_set_compressed_coordinates_GFp(ecGrp, ptRet, bnTmp, 0, bnCtx) && count < 100) This is their commit after they read our critique of their method: https://github.com/shadowproject/shadow/commit/106afc6975cf41090ca2a0c47877de0cc8a16f1a why you hatin on shadowcash? isnt your coin just a shadowcash clone? since when is stating a fact, "hatin"? Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: NextGenCrypto on March 08, 2016, 03:17:26 AM Everyone wants to buy...I'd suggest ya'll go vote on c-cex.
https://c-cex.com/?id=vote&coin=ec Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Bank_sy on March 08, 2016, 04:45:08 AM everyone wants to buy but noone will sell...... :o
Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: bangomatic on March 08, 2016, 01:59:29 PM It looks like SDC went live with our solution for hashToEC. https://i.imgur.com/S9Q3t7l.png They switched from creating a new generator, discussed here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378922.msg14079014#msg14079014 What's this mean? We are the leaders kids. This is the heart of our algo, pushed publicly 9 days ago: Code: for (j = 0; j < k; ++j) This is shadowcash's pushed to their repo 3 days ago: Code: while(!EC_POINT_set_compressed_coordinates_GFp(ecGrp, ptRet, bnTmp, 0, bnCtx) && count < 100) This is their commit after they read our critique of their method: https://github.com/shadowproject/shadow/commit/106afc6975cf41090ca2a0c47877de0cc8a16f1a why you hatin on shadowcash? isnt your coin just a shadowcash clone? since when is stating a fact, "hatin"? since your dev has been over in the SDC slack channel, pretty much on a daily basis, berating the devs there calling them idiots, fools, etc... I'd call that "hating" Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 08, 2016, 05:40:28 PM Hello, we deleted several posts quoting a particular vicious troll. If you were deleted it was not because of the content of your messages, but because of the specific troll you quoted. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: bangomatic on March 08, 2016, 05:48:47 PM Hello, we deleted several posts quoting a particular vicious troll. If you were deleted it was not because of the content of your messages, but because of the specific troll you quoted. LOL that wallet has more bugs than a bait store....Good Luck! Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 08, 2016, 05:50:48 PM Hello, we deleted several posts quoting a particular vicious troll. If you were deleted it was not because of the content of your messages, but because of the specific troll you quoted. LOL that wallet has more bugs than a bait store....Good Luck! Please let us know if you find any. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: bangomatic on March 08, 2016, 05:52:08 PM Hello, we deleted several posts quoting a particular vicious troll. If you were deleted it was not because of the content of your messages, but because of the specific troll you quoted. LOL that wallet has more bugs than a bait store....Good Luck! Please let us know if you find any. I wont need too! you'll find them soon enough. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 08, 2016, 06:28:45 PM Hello, we deleted several posts quoting a particular vicious troll. If you were deleted it was not because of the content of your messages, but because of the specific troll you quoted. LOL that wallet has more bugs than a bait store....Good Luck! Please let us know if you find any. I wont need too! you'll find them soon enough. We fixed the main one from SDC, which was the bug that completely deanoned the shadowcash chain. It was a good fix and SDC copied it, scrapping their own fix hours after we pointed out flaws in theirs. If we find more bugs, then we will fix them and, like our anon fix, SDC is welcome to copy them. Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 09, 2016, 01:45:16 AM Eclipse has been added for trading on c-cex.com!
Here is BTC and USD trading pairs: https://c-cex.com/?p=ec-btc https://c-cex.com/?p=ec-usd Also it is tradable to LTC and DOGE: https://c-cex.com/?p=ec-ltc https://c-cex.com/?p=ec-doge Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: Bank_sy on March 09, 2016, 03:51:43 AM Eclipse has been added for trading on c-cex.com! Here is BTC and USD trading pairs: https://c-cex.com/?p=ec-btc https://c-cex.com/?p=ec-usd Also it is tradable to LTC and DOGE: https://c-cex.com/?p=ec-ltc https://c-cex.com/?p=ec-doge finally EC is on exchange! Title: Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now! Post by: dfgv12 on March 09, 2016, 03:53:44 AM Hello dev any bounty for translating???
Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: wasref on March 09, 2016, 10:58:31 AM with roadmap released i see this heading much higher.
coin supply price cap shadowcash 6,5million 19k sats $530,000 eclipse 2.1million 2500 sats $21k with only 20k on sell side 100k sats lol Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Bank_sy on March 09, 2016, 05:18:44 PM with roadmap released i see this heading much higher. coin supply price cap shadowcash 6,5million 19k sats $530,000 eclipse 2.1million 2500 sats $21k with only 20k on sell side 100k sats lol maybe.... if devs continue to support EC... Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 09, 2016, 05:30:51 PM with roadmap released i see this heading much higher. coin supply price cap shadowcash 6,5million 19k sats $530,000 eclipse 2.1million 2500 sats $21k with only 20k on sell side 100k sats lol maybe.... if devs continue to support EC... We aren't going anywhere. You'll see. ;D Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Bank_sy on March 09, 2016, 06:18:36 PM with roadmap released i see this heading much higher. coin supply price cap shadowcash 6,5million 19k sats $530,000 eclipse 2.1million 2500 sats $21k with only 20k on sell side 100k sats lol maybe.... if devs continue to support EC... We aren't going anywhere. You'll see. ;D okay i will be watching 8) Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: NextGenCrypto on March 09, 2016, 07:54:04 PM with roadmap released i see this heading much higher. coin supply price cap shadowcash 6,5million 19k sats $530,000 eclipse 2.1million 2500 sats $21k with only 20k on sell side 100k sats lol maybe.... if devs continue to support EC... We aren't going anywhere. You'll see. ;D okay i will be watching 8) +1 Getting a little bit of volume on c-cex. Let's hope it builds from here. Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: lotfipro on March 09, 2016, 08:09:43 PM HOW to stake EC ? daily 300 coin EVRY 337.5 block or evry 4 wekend or what ??
Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: NextGenCrypto on March 09, 2016, 10:24:07 PM HOW to stake EC ? daily 300 coin EVRY 337.5 block or evry 4 wekend or what ?? Transfer it to your wallet, and leave it opened and unlocked for staking. Easy as that. Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Bank_sy on March 10, 2016, 01:04:39 AM with roadmap released i see this heading much higher. coin supply price cap shadowcash 6,5million 19k sats $530,000 eclipse 2.1million 2500 sats $21k with only 20k on sell side 100k sats lol maybe.... if devs continue to support EC... We aren't going anywhere. You'll see. ;D okay i will be watching 8) +1 Getting a little bit of volume on c-cex. Let's hope it builds from here. with proper planning this can get to at least $100,000 market cap, maybe even compete with shadow later Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: wasref on March 10, 2016, 02:16:10 PM price is stablized around here we need a direction as to where this is going so people can know what to do
Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Bank_sy on March 10, 2016, 03:55:25 PM price is stablized around here we need a direction as to where this is going so people can know what to do still waiting to see what dev wants to do with coin... Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Black Mamba on March 11, 2016, 07:32:19 PM Any news??
Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 11, 2016, 10:08:05 PM Hang tight gents. Rome wasn't built overnight. Enjoy the trading. Market is pretty thin. Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: maxxdxx on March 12, 2016, 09:49:02 AM Pump EC 8)
Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 12, 2016, 09:51:10 AM Any news?? Purposefully no. We are letting things mix up on c-cex. Right now is the time for the faithless to dump and the brave to buy. Keep an eye on the big address. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/#!rich Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Black Mamba on March 12, 2016, 10:06:24 AM Any news?? Purposefully no. We are letting things mix up on c-cex. Right now is the time for the faithless to dump and the brave to buy. Keep an eye on the big address. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/#!rich Yes he or she staking like crazy Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Bank_sy on March 12, 2016, 04:14:19 PM Any news?? Purposefully no. We are letting things mix up on c-cex. Right now is the time for the faithless to dump and the brave to buy. Keep an eye on the big address. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/#!rich what are we watching for? ??? ::) Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Black Mamba on March 12, 2016, 07:19:37 PM Any news?? Purposefully no. We are letting things mix up on c-cex. Right now is the time for the faithless to dump and the brave to buy. Keep an eye on the big address. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/#!rich what are we watching for? ??? ::) To the Eclipse ::) Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 12, 2016, 09:40:59 PM Any news?? Purposefully no. We are letting things mix up on c-cex. Right now is the time for the faithless to dump and the brave to buy. Keep an eye on the big address. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/#!rich what are we watching for? ??? ::) We are waiting a week or so while Eclipse gets traded on C-CEX to improve the distribution. Mostly because the coin didn't get a lot of attention at first, the distribution is not very good. Hopefully, being on an exchange a while will fix that. Miners should be in good profit right now. After we have been on C-CEX for a week, we'll start better communication. Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: WigitGetIt on March 12, 2016, 11:27:14 PM Any news?? Purposefully no. We are letting things mix up on c-cex. Right now is the time for the faithless to dump and the brave to buy. Keep an eye on the big address. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/#!rich what are we watching for? ??? ::) Your watching for this address to dump. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/address.dws?3.htm (https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/address.dws?3.htm) It has 997,125.6373 EC Current Supply 2,247,240 EC Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Mark Zuckerberg on March 14, 2016, 05:43:33 AM Any news?? Purposefully no. We are letting things mix up on c-cex. Right now is the time for the faithless to dump and the brave to buy. Keep an eye on the big address. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/#!rich what are we watching for? ??? ::) Your watching for this address to dump. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/address.dws?3.htm (https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/address.dws?3.htm) It has 997,125.6373 EC Current Supply 2,247,240 EC hasnt happened yet? next? Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: kaene on March 14, 2016, 09:03:12 AM Any news?? Purposefully no. We are letting things mix up on c-cex. Right now is the time for the faithless to dump and the brave to buy. Keep an eye on the big address. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/#!rich what are we watching for? ??? ::) Your watching for this address to dump. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/address.dws?3.htm (https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/address.dws?3.htm) It has 997,125.6373 EC Current Supply 2,247,240 EC hasnt happened yet? next? Wouldn't that address be c-cex? Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: glax1983 on March 15, 2016, 06:23:19 AM Any news?? Purposefully no. We are letting things mix up on c-cex. Right now is the time for the faithless to dump and the brave to buy. Keep an eye on the big address. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/#!rich what are we watching for? ??? ::) Your watching for this address to dump. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/address.dws?3.htm (https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/address.dws?3.htm) It has 997,125.6373 EC Current Supply 2,247,240 EC hasnt happened yet? next? Wouldn't that address be c-cex? I think not. This address had so much coins before listing on c-cex Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: NextGenCrypto on March 15, 2016, 08:39:44 PM Things have been quiet, I'll offer a few suggestions that maybe the devs could offer bounties for?
1. New logo, branding, etc. 2. New website 3. IRC/Twitter/Slack tipbot 4. Signature campaign 5. Blog articles, etc. In addition, more frequent communication w/ the community would go a long way. Just my 2 EC. Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: complexring on March 17, 2016, 12:40:14 AM Things have been quiet, I'll offer a few suggestions that maybe the devs could offer bounties for? 1. New logo, branding, etc. 2. New website 3. IRC/Twitter/Slack tipbot 4. Signature campaign 5. Blog articles, etc. In addition, more frequent communication w/ the community would go a long way. Just my 2 EC. Great ideas! I'm looking forward to see where this is going. The logos that were posted by one of the other members was pretty nice looking. What happened with that? Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 17, 2016, 01:14:46 AM Things have been quiet, I'll offer a few suggestions that maybe the devs could offer bounties for? 1. New logo, branding, etc. 2. New website 3. IRC/Twitter/Slack tipbot 4. Signature campaign 5. Blog articles, etc. In addition, more frequent communication w/ the community would go a long way. Just my 2 EC. Great ideas! I'm looking forward to see where this is going. The logos that were posted by one of the other members was pretty nice looking. What happened with that? Ultimately we are looking for more than just a new logo. As was suggested above, we agree it's time for some updates and we'd like to work with someone who could design a logo, additional artwork, design the website, etc. rather than just a new logo. If anyone has any suggestions or has the skills personally, please send us a message. Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Bank_sy on March 19, 2016, 10:27:28 PM dead
Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Black Mamba on March 20, 2016, 12:58:38 PM Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 20, 2016, 06:13:06 PM EC Bounty Offer:
As noted previously, we are looking for someone to begin working with us on a new logo, images, website, etc. to help establish the Eclipse brand so we can begin moving forward in other areas. The reward for this work will be paid in EC and will be negotiated based on the services provided. If you are interested, please reach out to us via PM or email at admin@eclipsecrypto.com. We will also offer a small finders fee for anyone who refers the person we choose to work with. If you've got suggestions on a top notch designer, let us know and you may receive some EC! Like we've said before, we're not going anywhere. We'll try to be better about staying in communication, but please do not assume we'll have a daily "update". More to come. Don't lose faith so easily. Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: kondiomir on March 21, 2016, 07:42:55 PM Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 23, 2016, 09:18:28 PM EC Bounty Offer: As noted previously, we are looking for someone to begin working with us on a new logo, images, website, etc. to help establish the Eclipse brand so we can begin moving forward in other areas. The reward for this work will be paid in EC and will be negotiated based on the services provided. If you are interested, please reach out to us via PM or email at admin@eclipsecrypto.com. We will also offer a small finders fee for anyone who refers the person we choose to work with. If you've got suggestions on a top notch designer, let us know and you may receive some EC! Like we've said before, we're not going anywhere. We'll try to be better about staying in communication, but please do not assume we'll have a daily "update". More to come. Don't lose faith so easily. We've updated this to a full blown Logo contest with .1 BTC reward. Please check out the thread here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1410021.0 Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: penambang on March 27, 2016, 06:38:14 AM Hi,
I'm trying to build QT wallet on my ubuntu but failed: Code: src/init.h:10:21: fatal error: eclipse.h: No such file or directory where I can find that file? Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 27, 2016, 09:31:08 PM Hi, I'm trying to build QT wallet on my ubuntu but failed: Code: src/init.h:10:21: fatal error: eclipse.h: No such file or directory where I can find that file? Did you run autogen.sh then configure? You need to have automake and autoconf installed. Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: penambang on March 28, 2016, 04:16:05 AM Hi, I'm trying to build QT wallet on my ubuntu but failed: Code: src/init.h:10:21: fatal error: eclipse.h: No such file or directory where I can find that file? Did you run autogen.sh then configure? You need to have automake and autoconf installed. I usually build linux wallet using qmake. Update: I edit path to eclipse.h in init.h to: Code: #include "tor/adapter/eclipse.h" Also there is wrong file on eclipse.pro (ringsig.cpp instead of sigringu.cpp?) Now I got this error: Code: build/init.o: In function `AppInit2(boost::thread_group&)': eclipsed daemon was successfully compiled without error, but I need GUI wallet. Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Skyrik on March 29, 2016, 09:48:37 PM good project devs. And i like your wallet. We need to go on yobit may be some posts in twitter with request ?
Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Skyrik on March 29, 2016, 10:08:23 PM Hi, I'm trying to build QT wallet on my ubuntu but failed: Code: src/init.h:10:21: fatal error: eclipse.h: No such file or directory where I can find that file? Did you run autogen.sh then configure? You need to have automake and autoconf installed. Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Black Mamba on March 30, 2016, 07:54:44 AM Guys, everybody please make this request: https://yobit.net/en/addcoin/ (https://yobit.net/en/addcoin/). We need more exchanges for EC. Thanks You mean we need more volume ;) Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 30, 2016, 09:37:17 PM Hi, I'm trying to build QT wallet on my ubuntu but failed: Code: src/init.h:10:21: fatal error: eclipse.h: No such file or directory where I can find that file? Did you run autogen.sh then configure? You need to have automake and autoconf installed. Yes, PoW has ended and Eclipse is currently PoS only. When the time is appropriate, we will create a Slack channel. :D Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on April 02, 2016, 05:51:56 PM Check out the submission from the winner of our logo contest! Stay tuned!
Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: magaura on April 03, 2016, 02:22:14 AM Check out the submission from the winner of our logo contest! Stay tuned! :o GOOOD! Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Skyrik on April 04, 2016, 12:19:02 PM soon will be update? we are waiting for it ^_^
Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: kamvreto on April 04, 2016, 05:12:44 PM Check out the submission from the winner of our logo contest! Stay tuned! :o GOOOD! good design bro !! teach me.. ;) Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on April 04, 2016, 09:20:19 PM soon will be update? we are waiting for it ^_^ Soon-ish there will be an update. Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Skyrik on April 05, 2016, 12:47:10 PM soon will be update? we are waiting for it ^_^ Soon-ish there will be an update. Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Mysterion on April 05, 2016, 01:54:05 PM Looking to buy a good amount of EC off exchange, please get in touch via PM!!
Maybe Eclipse Dev is willing to provide escrow? Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Skyrik on April 08, 2016, 06:39:33 PM dead coin?
Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on April 09, 2016, 04:04:32 PM Looking to buy a good amount of EC off exchange, please get in touch via PM!! Maybe Eclipse Dev is willing to provide escrow? Please let us know, we'd be happy to help. dead coin? More alive than ever before. Quite a bit going on in the background, things don't happen over night. We'll step up our efforts to communicate more. Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Skyrik on April 09, 2016, 08:11:25 PM Looking to buy a good amount of EC off exchange, please get in touch via PM!! Maybe Eclipse Dev is willing to provide escrow? Please let us know, we'd be happy to help. dead coin? More alive than ever before. Quite a bit going on in the background, things don't happen over night. We'll step up our efforts to communicate more. Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Mysterion on April 10, 2016, 01:05:49 PM Offer still stands.
If anyone wants out at current price (+25% premium) without crashing the market, let me know :) Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: magaura on April 12, 2016, 05:15:03 AM I'm buying too..if you want to sell.. dm
Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Arrakeen on April 12, 2016, 06:19:51 AM Any pools available for this coin?
Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Mysterion on April 12, 2016, 08:48:22 AM Any pools available for this coin? POW is over I think.. How much is the current POS reward? Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Black Mamba on April 12, 2016, 04:38:30 PM Any pools available for this coin? POW is over I think.. How much is the current POS reward? Post-HiPoS Reward: 10 Corona Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Mysterion on April 14, 2016, 06:52:10 PM Post-HiPoS Reward: 10 Corona Is that equal to 10 EC or how much is that? Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Black Mamba on April 15, 2016, 04:04:28 AM Post-HiPoS Reward: 10 Corona Is that equal to 10 EC or how much is that? Yess .. Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Skyrik on April 16, 2016, 02:01:17 AM Looking to buy a good amount of EC off exchange, please get in touch via PM!! Maybe Eclipse Dev is willing to provide escrow? Please let us know, we'd be happy to help. dead coin? More alive than ever before. Quite a bit going on in the background, things don't happen over night. We'll step up our efforts to communicate more. Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Bank_sy on April 16, 2016, 07:44:23 PM Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: kcanup on April 22, 2016, 05:55:44 PM Wheres dev? He's offline since 12 April...
Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: penambang on April 29, 2016, 03:18:02 PM Coin dead?
Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on April 29, 2016, 06:25:11 PM We're here. Far from dead, breathing new life into EC.
;) Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Bank_sy on April 30, 2016, 09:04:58 PM We're here. Far from dead, breathing new life into EC. ;) More alive than ever before. Quite a bit going on in the background, things don't happen over night. We'll step up our efforts to communicate more. soon will be update? we are waiting for it ^_^ Soon-ish there will be an update. Hang tight gents. Rome wasn't built overnight. Enjoy the trading. Market is pretty thin. with roadmap released i see this heading much higher. coin supply price cap shadowcash 6,5million 19k sats $530,000 eclipse 2.1million 2500 sats $21k with only 20k on sell side 100k sats lol maybe.... if devs continue to support EC... We aren't going anywhere. You'll see. ;D same thing as every other scam coin... dev just keeps posting "you will see! wait a bit more!" ::) ::) ::) Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Eclipse Crypto on May 01, 2016, 12:52:06 AM We're here. Far from dead, breathing new life into EC. ;) More alive than ever before. Quite a bit going on in the background, things don't happen over night. We'll step up our efforts to communicate more. soon will be update? we are waiting for it ^_^ Soon-ish there will be an update. Hang tight gents. Rome wasn't built overnight. Enjoy the trading. Market is pretty thin. with roadmap released i see this heading much higher. coin supply price cap shadowcash 6,5million 19k sats $530,000 eclipse 2.1million 2500 sats $21k with only 20k on sell side 100k sats lol maybe.... if devs continue to support EC... We aren't going anywhere. You'll see. ;D same thing as every other scam coin... dev just keeps posting "you will see! wait a bit more!" ::) ::) ::) And what is it you are doing to help? Exactly. Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Skyrik on May 01, 2016, 12:56:26 AM Anyway you need to inform all community of EC about progress of development....
Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: chivaki on May 01, 2016, 01:53:30 AM Anyway you need to inform all community of EC about progress of development.... Yup 100% rightTitle: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Bank_sy on May 01, 2016, 04:22:55 AM We're here. Far from dead, breathing new life into EC. ;) More alive than ever before. Quite a bit going on in the background, things don't happen over night. We'll step up our efforts to communicate more. soon will be update? we are waiting for it ^_^ Soon-ish there will be an update. Hang tight gents. Rome wasn't built overnight. Enjoy the trading. Market is pretty thin. with roadmap released i see this heading much higher. coin supply price cap shadowcash 6,5million 19k sats $530,000 eclipse 2.1million 2500 sats $21k with only 20k on sell side 100k sats lol maybe.... if devs continue to support EC... We aren't going anywhere. You'll see. ;D same thing as every other scam coin... dev just keeps posting "you will see! wait a bit more!" ::) ::) ::) And what is it you are doing to help? Exactly. there is nothing to help... what do i do??? say to someone "buy EC" they ask me why and i wont be able to say why. Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Skyrik on May 10, 2016, 03:57:06 PM 1.5 month without any news . this coin is dead
Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Anoona on May 11, 2016, 12:17:29 AM Dead coin, any advance on this? lol
Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Black Mamba on May 11, 2016, 04:11:41 AM Dead coin, any advance on this? lol Yes move on ! 8) I don't think so.. :D Yes I know if the developers themselves have collected enough coins . Then they re- launch this shit ;) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378922.msg14401318#msg14401318 https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/#!rich https://i.imgur.com/CEonbGi.png Good luck !! :D Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: Bank_sy on May 26, 2016, 12:36:32 AM I don't think so.. :D Yes I know if the developers themselves have collected enough coins . Then they re- launch this shit ;) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378922.msg14401318#msg14401318 https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/#!rich https://i.imgur.com/CEonbGi.png Good luck !! :D dev has too much coins and there is no development. Good thing i dumped long time ago 8) 8) 8) Title: Re: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Trade on C-cex! Post by: voteformeg on May 28, 2016, 09:00:35 PM wish i did that too , i am now a bagholder of an eclipsecoin that has nothing to keep them for , when coin started it was a good coin but after the logo contest no big news anymore
but again i paid BTC to learn a lesson Title: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ Ring Signatures | Anonymous | TOR | Stealth Addresses Post by: Eclipse Crypto on March 30, 2017, 05:55:29 PM ------- // ------- Hi all! We are excited to share some progress with you! After an extended communication hiatus (for which we apologize -- there is only so often we can say that we are working in the background, albeit slowly), we are preparing to roll out the results that we have done over the last year and announce the next steps in our plan for continued development and community support. It has taken some time to solidify a plan moving forward, but we have managed to put an excellent team together to take this project to the next level. As we all worked full-time jobs over the last year, it was a challenge to allocate time and resources to drive the necessary momentum from the beginning. However, with the reality of several team members stepping down from their full time commitments and committing to Eclipse full time, we know that we can turn our plans into a reality. We have updated the OP where you will find new details on Eclipse development that highlight some of the necessary changes that we hope will not only build confidence in our new structure but also in our team and the future of Eclipse. We are sure that many of you have questions. We will be available here but also more readily available on our Slack channel https://eclipsecrypto.slack.com (https://eclipsecrypto.slack.com) and we encourage everyone to join to stay up to date on progress moving forward. Get yourself an invite at https://eclipsecrypto.herokuapp.com (https://eclipsecrypto.herokuapp.com). We are looking forward to welcoming you! We are excited to have a clear path forward and and appreciate any feedback from the community. Stay tuned during the next few days. More to come! Team Eclipse ------- // ------- The all new Eclipse OP https://i.imgur.com/dGFqNbU.jpg https://i.imgur.com/S5JY1mx.png https://i.imgur.com/wSvwXTC.png Ring signatures are the basis of all the anonymous features of Eclipse. Ring signatures obsfucate the originator of a message so that the only mathematical proof that can be attained is that 1 person out of N people is the original writer of a given message. The message can take the form of proposing a new rule, donating tokens, transferring property, or leaking confidential material. https://i.imgur.com/1qhASDa.jpg By design, ring signatures require the computation of a value known as a „key image“. Key images in Eclipse are generated using an algorithm known as „Try-and-Increment“, a cryptographically secure method for mapping a scalar hash to a point on the elliptic curve. The security of Try-and-Increment comes from the fact that this method does not rely on the group generator (i.e. basepoint) of the elliptic curve. The inclusion of our implementation of Try-and-Increment, based on the algorithm proposed in How to Hash into Elliptic Curves (https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6WcJrXCGAnLNjhWekZ4T1c1blk), is our only modification to the optimized libsecp256k1 library that is used in libbitcoincore. https://i.imgur.com/oGqTDkp.png (http://eclipsecrypto.com/)https://i.imgur.com/CkwXw1i.png (https://twitter.com/eclipsecrypto)https://i.imgur.com/xGw6tSY.png (https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/) https://i.imgur.com/S1FUnoT.png (https://eclipsecrypto.herokuapp.com/) https://i.imgur.com/tOqcYFW.png Ticker: EC Algorithm: SHA-256d PoW/PoS with Independent Targeting PoW Block Time: 256 seconds (4 minutes) Max PoW Mining Supply: 2.78 Million (last block 4725) PoW Reward: 4027 EC halving every 337.5 blocks PoS V2 PoS Min Age: 8 hours HiPoS Length: 4 Weeks HiPoS Reward: 300 Corona, decreasing by 10/day to 20 Corona Post-HiPoS Reward: 10 Corona Parameters Algo: SHA256d Fee (Comission): 0.0002 EC Secp256k1: New (bitcoin) Language: C++ Ports Port: 35914 (testnet: 35915) RPC Port: 45914 (testnet: 45915) https://i.imgur.com/WR67Dww.jpg Blockchains that are forks of ByteCoin, the original CryptoNote token, use Ed25519 (see: High-speed high-security signatures (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13389-012-0027-1)), an elliptic curve in a Twisted Edwards form, for their digital signatures. Ed25519 is birationally equivalent to Curve25519, an elliptic curve in Montgomery form, originally studied by D.J. Bernstein in Curve25519: new Diffie-Hellman speed records (https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6WcJrXCGAnLaUpmM0tXb2czQW8). Unfortunately, one cannot be entirely certain if the parameters that were used for Curve25519 (and the subsequently derived parameters for Ed25519) were chosen in such a way to allow a backdoor by the NIST (which has been known to happen with SECP256R1 due to the Snowden revelations) due to choosing the restrictive parameter space a posteriori after a suitably (insecure) curve had been constructed. It is our opinion that neither the security of this curve nor the integrity of Bernstein is up for debate. However, SECP256K1, a Koblitz curve, had parameters chosen by a community of cryptographers as opposed to one cryptographer; it is our opinion that one researcher could be a malicious actor easier than multiple researchers acting in a Byzantine manner. We decided to use the SECP256K1 elliptic curve for Eclipse due to its parameters being chosen publicly in a way to achieve fast arithmetic operations and its long-standing usage with blockchains. https://i.imgur.com/df0dH3l.png Our Team is dedicated to the long-term success of Eclipse Crypto. However, ‘long-term success’ are mere words unless we back them up with action. We have decided to impose a restriction to the access of 1.4 Million EC of our Development Fund wallet using the CheckLockTimeVerify (CLTV) operation. Using this built-in script functionality, we made it so that 1/40 of the tokens that are in control of the Founding Team will become available at the beginning of every quarter for the next 10 years. This action effectively reduces the supply by 40% and gradually increases the access to the coins over the next decade. We are the first cryptocurrency development team to combine these features to create a long-term funding model. We believe that by doing this, we demonstrate our commitment to the development of Eclipse Crypto, not with words, but with recorded, transparent, and provable actions that can be queried on the blockchain. In addition, the coins that are locked away for the next 10 years will not be staking. The Development Fund will be paid quarterly over 10 years: · 1 part for each of the 6 Team Members (to pay for continued development and code maintenance) · 1 part for bounties, marketing, and promotional events / community prizes The remaining 89770 Eclipse from the developers’ public address build the Eclipse Marketing & Development Fund which can be found here: Eco2cHFa6TvTDFhUpdQVvRbMvsajg1ox8A (https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/address.dws?3.htm) The 1.4 Million Eclipse will be locked using CLTV for the forementioned purpose and can be found here (non staking) : ELM61RTMp9Rd13YRwfHxPHrCf8i3p2tu7X (https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/address.dws?13258.htm) https://i.imgur.com/h6ifio8.png https://i.imgur.com/PEyDtsD.png (https://bitbucket.org/EclipseCrypto/eclipse-releases/raw/9bd27571239dcd77a44e6b3dd96eea5673c1cad0/Eclipse-Qt-1.0.0.zip)https://i.imgur.com/GU98Byy.png (https://bitbucket.org/EclipseCrypto/eclipse-releases/raw/9bd27571239dcd77a44e6b3dd96eea5673c1cad0/Eclipse-Qt.dmg)https://i.imgur.com/srAwTQE.png (https://github.com/EclipseCrypto/eclipse) https://i.imgur.com/9ZMUp6m.png (http://eclipsecrypto.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/eclipse-crypto-whitepaper.pdf) https://i.imgur.com/o7HMSG7.png 1. Anonymous Proposals You, along with Alice, Bob, Charlie, and Dianna, belong to an organization that creates rules that determine how everyone behave towards one another. You want to propose a rule that benefits yourself, Bob, and Dianna. However, you have a strong working relationship with Alice and Charlie and don’t want them to find out that you proposed a new law that doesn’t benefit them. With ring signatures, you can hide the fact that you were the one who suggested this new rule. https://i.imgur.com/HsPPaPR.png 2. Anonymous Donations You support an organization that is run by Alice and Bob. Eve is collecting information for Gordon to know who supports and donates to Alice and Bob’s organization. You can donate to Alice and Bob’s organization without Eve finding out and telling Gordon with the use of ring signatures. You support Alice for a particular political office. However, you are not able to donate more than a certain amount to her campaign due to individual contribution limits. With ring signatures, you can avoid these rules by hiding the fact that you are the person donating to Alice’s campaign. https://i.imgur.com/HsPPaPR.png 3. Anonymous Money Transfers You are working in China and make more than $50,000 worth of Yuan in a year. You are afraid that China’s central bank may decide to debase their currency even further, rendering your current holdings in the Yuan worth less. You recently read the news how the Chinese government is trying to stop people from transfering more money out of China than they are allowed using Bitcoin. Eclipse, with its implementation of ring signatures for anonymous money transfers, allows you to circumvent China’s currency exportation laws and anonymously transfer more money out of the country than you are allowed by law. https://i.imgur.com/HsPPaPR.png 4. Anonymous Property Transfers You possess a digital token that represents ownership of some type of property. You can anonymously transfer your property, and the underlying token that represents ownership, to someone else using ring signatures. https://i.imgur.com/HsPPaPR.png 5. Anonymous Whistle Blowing You work for an organization that is performing actions that you believe are unjust. However, you fear for your life if you speak out and tell others about these unfair practices. With the help of ring signatures, you can be an anonymous whistleblower and bring to light the activities with which you do not agree. https://i.imgur.com/d6hYqo2.png https://i.imgur.com/b8FAUGg.png (https://c-cex.com/?p=ec-btc)https://i.imgur.com/l0ELiIH.png (https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/Exchange/?market=EC_BTC) ------- // ------- Hi all! The new Eclipse website is now live! eclipsecrypto.com (http://eclipsecrypto.com/) more to come soon … Team Eclipse ------- // ------- ------- // ------- Hi all! We're proud to announce that the long awaited Eclipse Whitepaper is now ready! Check it out! You can find it here (http://eclipsecrypto.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/eclipse-crypto-whitepaper.pdf). https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378922.msg14026068#msg14026068 > Downloads http://eclipsecrypto.com/ > Downloads Stay tuned! Team Eclipse ------- // ------- ------- // ------- Trade Eclipse on the following exchanges: https://i.imgur.com/b8FAUGg.png (https://c-cex.com/?p=ec-btc)https://i.imgur.com/l0ELiIH.png (https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/Exchange/?market=EC_BTC) https://c-cex.com/?p=ec-btc https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/Exchange/?market=EC_BTC Team Eclipse ------- // ------- |
