Bitcoin Forum

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

Vcash


Welcome to the official community topic of Vcash. This topic is moderated by the Vcash community members.

Vcash is a cryptographic currency that is not a clone of any other project. It is designed to be innovative and forward-thinking. It prevents eavesdropping and censorship, promotes decentralized, energy efficient and fast network transactions by use of irrevocable contracts and provides opt-in client-side anonymity. It has no pre-mine, pre-sale, IPO, ICO or BS.

Specifications:

30.7 million coins.
Variable block time targeting 80-200 seconds.
128 coins per block initially.
Difficulty is retargeted every block.
Blake-256 Proof-of-Work algorithm.
0.7% interest rate by use of energy efficient Proof-of-Stake.
0.0005 coin per kilobyte transaction fee.

Whitepaper:

http://v.cash/papers/vanillacoin.pdf

Wallets:

http://v.cash/wallets.php

Exchanges:

Bittrex: https://www.bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-XVC
Poloniex: https://poloniex.com/exchange#btc_xvc
RAWX: https://beta.rawx.io/#/markets/BTC:XVC

Projects:

https://github.com/john-connor/

Proof-of-Work Mining/Coin Distribution

http://pool.v.cash/
http://vcash.miningpoolhub.com/
http://xvc.maxminers.net/
http://xvc.suprnova.cc/

Ledger Explorer:
 
https://explorer.v.cash/
https://www.blockexperts.com/xvc/

Developer Announcements:

Development Team ANN: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1064326.0

Social:

Twitter: https://twitter.com/vdotcash
Forum: https://v.cash/forum/
https://v.cash/slack/

Disclaimer: This project is considered "beta" and is in an ever-changing state. This said, it moves rapidly and keeping up with the evolution is not easy. The best channel for up-to-date information is through the "official" forums. Anything posted on BCT or elsewhere regarding changes to this project's current state should not be considered unless also confirmed through the "official" forums.

Thank you for your support




I'll add the official threads info here.  Please add this to the front page smooth.   If you really want this to be an unmoderated announcement page you should at least start it off with the appropriate information.

Just created an unofficial Vcash facebook fan group. Click below to join !!!

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1835848506633458/

hard to call a forum neutral when it is made by an XMR developer, but we will see.

Smooth, how much resources do most nodes of coins need to run in comparison to VCash?

I don't know. Why don't you tell us about how Vcash nodes are different from other coins'  nodes?

Human populations don't grow faster than Moore's law. Duh.

Disk arrays scale to anything we can fathom.

The issue is that no block chain consensus can maintain decentralization of validation, not because of scaling problems but because of the fundamental economic reality that not every miner can have an equal share of the hashrate, thus verification costs are not shared equally. The creates an asymmetry where economies-of-scale will maximize profit and grow hashrate the fastest thus centralizing mining.

The solution requires some clever innovation on proof-of-work.

Here is the official thread without smooth's manipulation and lies:


"First they spreading fud, but now bitcoin core will copy Vcash code"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1441929.0

At best one would see the type of cartel that TPTB_need_war  has suggested; however my take is that this kind of cartel would only last for a short time before collapsing. Just witness what is currently happening in the crude oil market.

The solution to the block size problem has nothing to do with controlling the size of the blocks.
blah blah blah shit blah blah

The solution to the block size problem has nothing to do with controlling the size of the blocks. It requires a different design where transaction fees trend near to costs but not to costs, thus not making the nodes of the system bankrupt.

Quote from: r0ach on April 18, 2016, 08:36:11 PM
Wasn't the Bitpay solution the one where there's no negative incentive for continuously inflating the block size over time?  I haven't really spent any time examining any of the adaptive block size proposals, but it's obviously not as simple as just coding up something that sounds logical if you're unable to identify all the various game theory and attack vectors involved.

John's answer

I've never seen a proposal other than mine that had working code

Monero and prior to that Bytecoin has had working dynamic block size code since early 2014. It has been proven in the wild against three at least spam environments, one due to poorly-written pool code and twice against malicious attacks.

I'd like to remind people that my algorithm(s) for adaptive block size generation are Bitcoin/Peercoin protocol specific. After a year of reviewing the Cryptonote source code I no longer take any of it's derived projects seriously so it does not pertain. To get back on topic, my simple algorithm adapts to traffic influx while simultaneously preventing "arbitrary block size" DoS attacks, lastly it is highly configurable, adaptive yet simple while scaling to ∞ TPS.

Blockstream has no authority to make this wild claim that Bitcoin will ever have an adaptive block sizing solution because they are no authority figure over Bitcoin. Stephen Pair of BitPay came up with a written solution here: https://medium.com/@spair/a-simple-adaptive-block-size-limit-748f7cbcfb75#.pb5cyk56m using a common sense and simple approach but he only touched on the subject and did not produce any code to prove his theory so while possibly good it doesn't help us today. That said, you have a simple and adaptive solution that can be deployed "today" to any Bitcoin or Peercoin based crypto-currency:

https://gist.github.com/john-connor/c1e131771cfcca02ac9e7a14a4f08caf

Peace and Love 8)

every body knows that monero copy&paste bytecoin code.

This brings us back to the Cryptonote adaptive blocksize limit combined with a tail emission found in Monero where:
1) The cost of mining a block is set by the block subsidy

2) The total amount in fees per block has to rise to a number comparable to, but most of the time smaller, than the block subsidy.

The reason the above two scenarios do not apply to a Cryptonote coin with a tail emission such a Monero becomes apparent when one considers the economics of the total block reward components of fees and base reward (new coin emission). If the total in fees per block significantly exceed the base reward then it becomes economically attractive for miners to burn coins to the penalty by mining larger blocks. The block size rises until the total fees per block fall below a level where it is uneconomic for the miners to pay the penalty by increasing the blocksize. This level is comparable to the base reward. It is at this point where the need for a tail emission becomes clear, since without the tail emission the total block reward (fee plus base reward) would go to zero.

What was your retort to my prior post? I only see a photo with some inconclusive claims.

XMR dev creates an unmoderated thread about another coin...

XMR shills pile in to prove how shitty bitcointalk has become..

There are already other unmoderated forums that aren't on bitcointalk, and although I would rather discuss things here, you guys really show me why it has moved.


I mean really doesn't the XMR shill army have enough places for them to wag their tongues by now... 

Oh well that's my rant, from now on I'll just come in to add weekly updates.  Have fun running an XMR thread about XVC.

the question is why they created an unmoderated thread about Vcash?and i got it now...they know in their deep mind that Vcash is far more superior than Monero,and this thread is all about a place for FUDing Vcash.

the question is why they created an unmoderated thread about Vcash?

For unmoderated discussion. Enjoy.

For unmoderated discussion. Enjoy.

For unmoderated discussion. Enjoy.

there are other unmoderated places to discuss Vcash,

I'm not aware of any, but in any case, now there is one more.

...
Sorry as I told you before, Monero does not solve the Tragedy of the Commons in Satoshi's design. It does adaptively increase the block size while preventing spam surges.

I doubt John Conner's design has achieved any better, because as I explained at our prior discussion, there is no decentralized solution to that Tragedy of the Commons in the current proof-of-work designs. I have a solution, but it is a very radical change to the proof-of-work design that relies on unprofitable mining by payers.

I responded to this in the Monero Technical Discussion thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1139756.msg14610651#msg14610651 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1139756.msg14610651#msg14610651) I should point out that without a tail emission or something equivalent (for: example demurrage) to secure the coin I would predict that the coin will fail.

First they ignore your unmoderated thread
Then they make fun of your unmoderated thread
Then they fight your unmoderated thread
Then you win

Currently there are about 340 nodes, 312 of them incentivised.. you needed 10k xvc to run one..

Because it is actively getting fudded by the "old boys network". They saw the threat of it and started to shout that he was stealing code, while he made it from the ground up. They never gave any proof, but because the old boys were saying it, people started to believe it. But wat he is done right now is already revolutionary to the whole alt world. And now they are going to implement his code into theirs. How ironic.  

Ah, there he is, roflmao. Picture is complete. Changed from sockpuppet to your own account bro? You are bringing old news and we don't give a damn about it. You people make the first letter of fud become alive haha

The Devastation that man wrecks on himself (in short society is a power vacuum that requires a strong tyrant to beat the men into not defecting from the good of society):

Collectivism is a power vacuum and the argument is always about who gets to steal for and from whom.

Bernie: "Socialism can be repaired as long as I can be in charge of the stealing to insure it is fair".
Trump: "Stealing can be optimized if I am Dicktator-in-chief"
Clinton: "You'll tolerate my theft (for myself and my cronies) because as a Democrat I'll steal some for you too (and not remind you I funded it all by expanding an egregious future debt on your children's back)"

the question is why they created an unmoderated thread about Vcash?and i got it now...they know in their deep mind that Vcash is far more superior than Monero,and this thread is all about a place for FUDing Vcash.

You should rename this the Vcash Masturbation Topic because that's what it is, the usual suspects circle jerking each other off. However, since this thread only exist out of fear these Craptonote Clonejobs have 12 ZeroDay flaws left to be exploited. Piss me off. 8)

Sorry guys, i created a new thread yet another Vcash scamming-and-pumping self-moderated thread

Vcash is the only coin that ISPs can't kill by blocking a specific port and the only coin other than BTC that Poloniex only requires 1 confirmation for.  Even if you don't understand what john's doing, you must have some agenda for attacking the coin with clear innovations when there are so many pointless clones worth more.

I agree using different ports have merit but is this really a big deal? On most coins there are already quite a few nodes that use different ports for whatever reason (running multiple nodes on the same IP address being one of them), meaning in the unlikely case of a global port block, the coin would still work, but a lot of nodes would be (temporarily) cut off. They all have some kind of --port option or preference setting in a GUI, so if ISPs start blocking, wouldn't users just switch to different ports?

The average Joe shouldn't have to mess with his port configuration, "let the code handle it" to quote the man.

This seems like a simple change that any coin can make if and when needed.

Yet they are waiting for the train wreck to come before moving while Vcash is getting ready, scalable and future-proof.

You haven't answered how blocking a port is a train wreck. Your node stops working so you either change the port setting or download an update. Did port blocking kill Bittorrent?

Did Vcash (formerly Vanilla) use Bitcoin code, even in part, without indicating that they did so?

It clearly did. Some people care, some don't. Make up your own mind.

Are there any independent witnesses of the non-anonymous type?

Credible verification from reliable sources?

Can anyone point me to a good link, legit review from CoinDesk etc.

The many sites I perused just regurgitate the Vcash party line.

With the Greg Maxwell report, plus the deletions by Vcash on other threads and the attitude of John-Connor...

Mind made up.

I have no problem with moderation in announcement sections of bitcointalk.  So often this section is used by full troll/shills drowning out every useful piece of information posted there.

Please add this to the front page smooth.

Straight up trolls are bad but so is blatant censorship, which happens in the vcash forum and moderated thread.  posts get deleted unless they are something along the lines of "yay, vcash is the best!!!11!!1   hodl!!!"

There is no criticism or free opinions allowed ;)

Quote
Quote from: q327K091 on Today at 07:32:10 PM
Quote from: ocminer on Today at 06:51:42 PM
Quote from: luksbit on Today at 06:07:13 PM
vcash are you in freefall? sad :(


What comes around, goes around :)


why did you de-list the coin exactly, due to forks? who cares about the attitude , technology matters , if I would care about the attitude I would be in the academia  ::)

btw you run fantastic and honest pools.. yo probably are one of the most important people in the space... very solid! thank you

as far as vcash and network hash it has been transferred and high @ other pool, some taking chance solo, in general I would close an eye on an "attitude" Einstein was known to had one (big ego too but that's like being hidden from history books)

you also were not breaking bank @ocminer.. but you keep your fees low.. despite the fact your server costs can not be that low... thats very decent of you actuallly, overall your pool accounted for close to100% of the network.. which is never good, one of these days one of these coins will catapult to the BTC level.. hopefully.. will be super fun then.. now we kiiind of having fun, cheers

aaand someone is playing big now.. buy order @ 57413.52578572 , 8 BTC (where word big is relative) but for us at the moment is lol

in general if BTC core developers scan vcash c++ codebase for "ideas" above is a bargain

As john or some of his sheeps decided to delete my post containing nothing but truth from the other thread, I'm reposting it here:


Actually the XVC and former VNL pool was running for a long time, it was running flawless for all that time, I've always migrated to the latest version and xCore etc. helped a lot until one day suddenly it forked and I had to fully resynch to the network - a day after the resync it forked again and a third time the next day again, I always had to reimburse miners because they literally minted hot air while the pool was forked.

While investigating those forks I came to the conclusion that John actually banned/blacklisted the pools main IP and therefore caused the fork for the pool, he later also confirmed it on twitter:


https://i.imgur.com/VkiAPn4.png

https://i.imgur.com/7QIsf8Y.png


As it doesn't make sense fighting against the dev of the coin,the miners are always the losers, I decided to stop and close the pool for good. I was asking myself why the dev wouldn't contact me if the pool really spews invalid blocks. I've confirmed that all my blocks were and are fully valid as I compared them to other blocks (from other pools) on the network. It seems like only some privileged pools are "certified" to operate pools for the coin. However there are some ways to circumvent any ban, it wasn't worth the time then and it surely isn't yet.

I've heard from a miner that even his private pool forked a few days ago, he moved to another IP and it was fine again until this IP was also banned/blacklisted.. It's a hide and seek if you're trying to solo with lots of hash :)

I lost coins on your pool.
I think you're a clueless liar.
You were under ddos an just not able to mitigate, thats why you forked over and over again.

not sure what happened but it's nice shill thread you've got here

John deleted the official vcash forum and now redirects to a different, old forum.

This reminds me of the equinox dev some time ago:

https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FvZ1yIhd.jpg&t=570&c=hCoy5jjLdaStyQ


And to the guy who is the moderator of the unofficial, moderated xvc thread: When will you finally stop deleting posts in the thread, when will you be man enough to face the truth that John dumped and when will you wake up. You're not better than John by covering his back.

Are you that naive?  Do you not know that is Emilio Mann using a domain name registered to John Connor?

Are you that naive?  Do you not know that is Emilio Mann using a domain name registered to John Connor?

Are you that naive?  Do you not know that is Emilio Mann using a domain name registered to John Connor?

Who's Emilio Mann?  What domain name is he using, and for what uses?

Is the guy in the photo Emilio Mann?  Or is Emilio Mann the Equinox dev?  Or is Emilio Mann the moderator of the Unofficial XVC thread?

Emilio Mann is the moderator of the Unofficial XVC thread

Why is it important that his name is Emilio Mann?  Does he have a shady history?

Mazz admits that Vcash is a "well planned con" and he "doesn't want to have anything to do with it anymore". Well... I have respect for people who have the courage to admit that they were wrong. I hope you'll get to the bottom of it and find the truth.  ;)


https://i.imgsafe.org/dcfe6acdfe.jpg

Who is "John Connor"?

Does anyone actually know?

Why is it important that his name is Emilio Mann?  Does he have a shady history?

Emilio ? Hmm.. I wasn't aware he was actually moderating the thread, I thought he is/was a clever guy.. Ok, thanks for clearing that up.

EMILIO is JHON ?

https://i.imgur.com/75hbpTg.png

https://i.imgur.com/HKs11qH.jpg

FUBARed

Dun Dun, Dun Dun, Dun Dun

There are 4 people with the password moderating that thread.
I never deleted a post from you.



Nope
I am your father

the "mods" still delete in the original Thread...

IOW, you've learned nothing from the Vtrash debacle.

Le Sigh.

Funny how you didn't make your problem with John Conner explicit until it was safe, moot water under the bridge to do so.

The delusional Vtrash community takeover people right now:

https://i.imgur.com/J4RzF5f.jpg

EVERYONE knew John Connors personality was an issue. It was no secret, and I'm not defending and never did defend his personal traits. I've always said the guy puts out top code but thinks he is Einstein or Steve Jobs. Meaning "Hey I'm a genius coder and the best so I can be an @sshole to everyone like they were."  Well in crypto or any business, you need to have some social skills and be nice to at least the right people at the right time, and he obviously can't do that.

Icebreaker and Smooth, you guys really need to get over this John stole bitcoin code nonsense. I suppose you think Elon Musk stole Henry Fords formula when he decided to put tires on his Tesla car. John has already stated that there are some lines of code similiar to peercoin for compatibility and not re-inventing the wheel. Vcash is written from scratch and has almost no resemblance to bitcoin and a little resemblance to peercoin's most basic features. John also said he would credit Sonny King if Sonny wants him to. Hell he probably would even credit Satoshi Nakamoto for shits and giggles IF Satoshi asked him to. But so far he says Nick Szabo nor Sonny King has asked :)

So if John said his code was 99% from scratch and 1% was used from btc/ppc code to maintain backwards compatibility, would that make you happy? From scratch doesn't necessarily mean 100%. When you bake a cake from scratch you don't lay the eggs yourself. I agree with Wolf, you need to get over this little sticking point. No one that owns Vcash or may own Vcash in the future cares if it is 98, 99, or 100% original code.  No one cares if John used 1% of the same code from btc or ppc that 99% of other dev's use 90% of that code. Bottom line is he used FAR, FAR less and it is fine. Now I see your point if you want to be a stickler about whether he should or should not need to acknowledge either btc or ppc legally. But to me and most people what he did is not illegal, and even if it borders on unethical or illegal or he should do it. All I can say is when the speed limit is 55mph and you drive 56mph you did something illegal. When your kid has 10,000 songs on his ipod/iphone, he did something illegal. When you watch Game of Thrones on the internet without acknowleging and paying HBO, you did something illegal. When you surf porn, like 90% of the population, you probably run across something accidentaliy that is illegal for you to view without paying the producer somehow. There are all sorts of very slightly unethical or illegal stuff that everyone on the planet does, and no one gives a fuck. I guarantee you that both Smooth and Icebreaker have done one to all of the things mentioned above. So stop being the crypto cops, riaa, mpaa, etc. It is not your job, no one cares, and go do something useful like working on your coin.  And I'm the first one to say I don't agree with everything John is and does.  Sure he most likely has a genius level IQ (as do I), he sure as hell can code and knows a lot about p2p, crypto, mining, hardware, fpga, and coding in multiple languages on multiple devices, as well as creating one hell of a good coin. But he is arrogant, stubborn, makes up his own theories and realities sometimes, bans a lot of good people from twitter, hasn't doxed himself or promoted his project yet. He thinks that it is 2009 and Vcash is as important as BTC, he thinks he needs to be anonymous like Satoshi. This ISN'T 2009. To be successful in 2016 you need a credible face behind your project and promotion. No one in Vcash cares about your little "he stole a few lines of code and didn't acknowledge it" bullshit. What we care about is that he starts doing what any successful coin's creator or CEO does. Meaning tell us who the fuck you are, what all the great projects and code you have created over the last 20 years are, and start marketing/promoting your coin and getting the world to use it.  Smooth, you don't even know who Connor is. If he came out and was someone you respected, I bet you would be buying up Vcash. That is all.

to be honest it still doesn't bother me that he copied a few lines of code

Why re-write DirectX or OpenGl? Game devs use it all the time.

Now I agree his CHARACTER of not attributing that or admitting it is the problem. But still I say this all has nothing to do with the code it has everything to do with the man's honesty, character, and psych issues.

I actually don't care about his personal problems and I actually wish people would leave him (or other people with personal challenges who pop up here from time to time) alone about it. There is a sadistic streak on this forum that comes out where certain people want to "beat up the special kids" whenever they can. It isn't admirable.

Whatever challenges john-conner faces I hope he gets the help he needs and/or otherwise manages to reach some state of happiness and peace in his life.

So JC has been doxed. Now it`s time to dox asshole smooth!

I doubt you will be able to doxx @smooth. He is too astute.

Lol, I know I am really far removed from modern culture in that I didn't even realize that smooth's avatar is from the movie The Big Lebowski.

http://www.visitsidneyshelby.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/big-lebowski-poster.jpg

I don't believe that. Smooth has helped many people on this forum and he even defended JC:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1441959.msg17086298#msg17086298

What smooth didn't like was that JC was making claims of being a supreme expert and that all his code was original and yet he was actually using code from Bitcoin and his algorithms and whitepapers were lacking. (I am not defending iCEBREAKER who tends to be too political and hyper-critical of any coin he is not invested in)

JC is apparently a reasonably talented P2P (Bittorrent) dev (as I had long since publicly speculated that he was) and perhaps could be a great team member on a coin if his attitude improved (didn't he do good work in the past in Bittorrent group development?), but he is not capable of creating any significant breakthroughs for our ecosystem by himself (as  evident by the half-ass shit Zerotime and anonymity he produced). You shills can go on and on about "break it if you can", but it doesn't change the fact that we are collection of experts and we know what the fuck we are talking about. And you don't! So STFU or go on babbling your ignorance, your choice.

JC mislead speculators. Period. And for that he is receiving some animosity.

If he wants to come back, be non-anonymous subject to public scrutiny and improve his ethics (and cut out the drugs!), then maybe the community will give him another chance. But he needs to build a team of devs. One man shows are impossible. This stuff is way too complex and too much work for a one man development team.

I am not saying that he never had an original design idea. Apparently he made many tweaks which resulted in some better performance and compression characteristics. But those aren't apparently game changers. I know you Vcash supporters think they are, but I have a surprise coming for you.

Smooth et al stopped policing the altcoin discussion forums. They let JC destroy himself. You n00b speculators are so easily fooled, because you don't think clearly. You believe any technobabble that is thrown your direction. Or maybe you don't care, as long as you can fool some other n00bs. And this always backfires in the end. Only correct effort and honesty workout in the long-run. Ethics matter a lot for success. Those who cut corners end up failing. So don't blame your failure on smooth.

But he ripped people off. Why shouldn't they be a little bit pissed off?

He was ostensibly using the money from our altcoin ecosystem to ply his drug habit.

Maybe you are an upstanding individual, but how can you overcome the fact that your community is composed of mafia who threaten to steal and hack into the computers of other developers?


Your leader John Conner has established a culture of theft, lying, and technical incompetence.

Nobody truly capable (of significant game changing direction) is ever going to work on the source code that is Vcrash, because it was born of theft and will remain tainted forever.

And BTW, if anyone is thinking about hacking into my computer to steal my designs before I publish them open source, then you will be reported to the FBI. And you will never get the support of the speculators nor community, because the investors know that the copycoins do not have the leadership that the original inventor provides. The design itself is not enough, as you actually must have all the information that is not written in the white paper, including knowing how to do mass marketing (which you can't steal from my whitepaper nor from my brain because it is my talent).

Stealing doesn't work. It is failure. And Vtrash will always be a failure because it is born of and has a permanent entrenched culture of theft.

These failureturds blame their problems on @smooth (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1704796.msg17089106#msg17089106), who was even trying to be nice and wishing the best for JC (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1441959.msg17086298#msg17086298). When I try to explain that to them, they attack me creating sockpuppet account with an abusive name calling.

The community acts like spoiled brat, teenage retards. Acting like the boys who threw spitballs in class in elementary school. How can you build anything serious from a community like that?


We need honest and upstanding competition. This means to be ethical, professional, and compete honestly. May the best technology, with the best marketing, and the most inspired teams win. Open source. Respect for intellectual honesty and hard work. Respect for contributors and attempting to inspire the best-of-the-best to join the ecosystem. All this sleazy scams, mafia style, drug infested, nonsense should be ignored by upstanding, mature members of our altcoin speculator and investor community.


Our altcoin communities need to grow up. Be professional. And stop acting like pimple-faced, teenage boys.

I have nothing more to say to your community. I hope you disassociate yourself from this sleaze. Stop feeding the trolls. We have real work to do in the altcoin space. No more time for this nonsense!


No seriously and sufficiently talented group of developers are going to associate themselves with this project. There aren't that many truly capable developers in the altcoin arena. None of them are going to be inspired to work on a project that has this sleazy history. Period. You are wasting your time and effort.

---

Your community of liars and spin-masters is so inaccurate:


I haven't written anything about Vtrash for months. I wrote a few posts in past 24 hours because of the recent news.

You guys don't debate with intellectual honesty, nor mutual respect. Go read my recent posts. None of them were abusive, nor inaccurate hyperbole.

Your community only knows how to create fights. Every Vtrash thread is full of this intellectually dishonest crap from your sleazy community members.

oh no!  john conner smoked pot?   yes, that explains everything  ::)


@iamnotblack
If you think pot should be illegal, you need to spend a few moments and educate yourself.  Try to get at least a tiny amount of knowledge on the "dangers" of using pot regularly.  And then get a tiny amount of knowledge on the dangers of McDonald's fast food and tobacco.     Do you now think that fast food and tobacco should be illegal?  Should people who smoke tobacco and eat fast food get arrested?  The correct answer is NO.  You see, there's this little thing called personal freedom that many people, unlike yourself, value and respect. 

Also, please spend a few moments educating yourself on prohibition and all the negative effects it has had on society.  Do a little bonus research on how well prohibition worked out with alcohol.


cryptocurrency, to me and a hell of a lot of other people, is about personal freedom and personal privacy.  if you don't care about those things, why did you ever get involved?

One fine day...
You will get a letter informing you that the surgeon that performed your lobotomy smoked pot.

i'm sure my doctor will be drinking martinis and snorting pot off of a nurse's ass during surgery.  And afterwards, he's going to go buy some cheap Vcash. 

Unlike you guys, I wouldnt consider what John did as ripping people off...  He screwed people over for sure, but I think he just got tired of getting very little reward for his work, and finally just sold what he had and moved on...

It was bound to happen, and luckilly I got out before it did, but look at it this way.  The day of the altcoin is over,  there is very little new money moving into this space and everyone will fight over the last of the scraps as people realize that there will be no bitcoin killer,  true there will be new projects that work with  bitcoin and world currencies to allow remmitances in a fast and easy way, but there will not be another crypto currency that will challenge bitcoin for this use.  If it was going to succeed we would have seen much more money enterring the space as all these micro chains arose.

sorry guys no one cares about new solutions to the bitcoin problem without those solutions being inside the bitcoin environment.  I bet people couldnt cash out more than 100 million dollars from the entire alt space without completely drying it up and killing it forever.

peace out

I am out of altcoins and will be looking at how blockchain tech can be used in the realworld from now on, my libertarian dreams are gone, as the only thing to see here is pennystock gambling, not real world fixes.

JC is just an autistic person. Maybe he can't help it. But i know one thing...he never got the credit and respect he could deserve.  Just because he is being such an asshole to anyone.

We need 7 BTC of volume on Bittrex within the next 5 days.  Please sell to yourself a little if you have coins there.  Thank you

Something is going on with the massive Polo volume over the last few days. I know it is a captive market, but still. It is far from dead, just don't know if there will be a fork or battle like ETH/ETC, which I think would be bad for the coin. It doesn't need any more drama, does it?

Thanks yelllowsin for the update, there are guide to make a node ?  
to make some pos coin i need only the wallet ?

Thanks yelllowsin for the update, there are guide to make a node ? 
to make some pos coin i need only the wallet ?

Dead coins pump on Polo all the time.  BBR is the prime example.  XCN as well.

Even dead, useless proven scams like jl777hodl, XC, and BlockNet were victims of Polo necromancy at one time or another.

Here's what's going on.

https://i.imgur.com/EEQnFY8.jpg

The frog is long gone from this world, but its body may be animated by application of artificial external stimulus.

stumbled upon this coin... sounds like a coin with lots of history and stories.
is there a timeline of events archived somewhere?

Where is a good pool for this?

  burnt out my GPUs so havn't mined in a while, but i see this is still up:  https://pool.vchain.info/ (https://pool.vchain.info/)

That's similar to pool.vanillaco.in , I can't see if I'm earning something on those pools.

I'll start with this deleted post that was removed by one of their scam promoters claiming that Bitcoin is going "copy Vcash" by adding an adaptive blocksize. I pointed out that Monero (and previously Bytecoin) had such an adaptive blocksize almost a year before Vcash launched.


Enjoy this open, neutral forum for discussion of Vcash/Vanillacoin as my gift to you.

Other resources from community members below. No endorsement implied.