Bitcoin Forum

Listen to this interview (https://soundcloud.com/bitcoinuncensored/perianne-boring-of-digital-chamber-of-commerce-talks-blockchain-trooooooolll)

Laugh ;D

Look at her tweets:

https://anonmgur.com/up2/024939636451cfa9a9122e72cd2424a6.png
https://archive.is/Syjeg

Laugh more  ;D ;D

Holy shit!!  They ripped her head off!!!!

I am not saying she didn't deserve it, she probably did, but they seriously ripped her head off.  Buzz words overuse will get you into big ass trouble when talking to someone who understands things.  Those buzzwords only work on people who don't understand. 

I still like Perrianne - at least she is smoking hot.  Got to give her that.  Unfortunately, relying on your 'smoking hot' to get by furthers the notion that women are somehow less than men in these matters.

She might not understand what a blockchain is, but at least she is smoking hot...

http://twt-thumbs.washtimes.com/media/image/2011/05/18/20110518-194108-pic-647151526_s878x1316.jpg?54c4bc3dfb00f429c9006a0307a00e246c39169f

I forgive her.


https://bitcointa.lk/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fi1.wp.com%2Fwww.neverobsolete.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F04%2Fmedia-media237-0002376743-0002376743_SM_1237851431.jpg&hash=941c2b0d4d4f894c8fe1ebdb3763d50f

Goddammit. Can't we do something to get rid of men? I mean they're soooo over these days. I haven't seen one in a few years but I'm hoping they'll die off completely soon.

I'm gonna guess that the bitcoin space doesn't attract the most forgiving or socially able men to begin with so you'd better come well armed if you're gonna talk to one.

People are actually going to try to listen.  Then, when the speaker is talking in circles with nothing but more, and more buzz words, they are going to call you out.  She should have arrived with some decent content.  Showing up with nothing but hype and silly BS was a big mistake. This community gets bored fast when you try to pull the wool over.  She stepped on that hornet's nest all by herself.   But like I said, I forgive her.  She is a great addition to the community and I do hope we get to see more of her.  Much more of her.

She's also really insecure:
https://wp.stakepool.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/ClL6yeqVEAIbdAR.jpg
https://wp.stakepool.com/2016/06/18/perianne-boring-threatening-lawsuit-over-her-disasterous-interview-on-bitcoin-uncensored/
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4olwor/perianne_boring_of_digital_chamber_of_commerce/

Seems like her Chamber of Digital Commerce will promote anyone, even outright scams. You'd only have to pay them. It's like Perianne Boring founded this Chamber only to get paid for shilling. She doesn't know what's she's talking about anyway so why bother vetting?  :D

https://anonmgur.com/up2/336473e5f5ce55dea482f0167805c546.png
https://twitter.com/derosetech/status/744254129028079616

I haven't heard this. I don't think I will. Too embarrassing, to be honest. I can imagine that she is just a paid PR and knows nothing about how any of this actually works.

Not just paid for PR, she's the founder and President of the Chamber of Digital Commerce and has been featured as a speaker in many major Bitcoin events that attract interest of high profile investors. She even did a terrible job (https://youtu.be/6rGHSpC5uNk?t=7187) at indroducing the Australian Senate to bitcoin.

If that cease and desist email is real, then I am laughing my head off!  You've got to be kidding?!  She thinks she has the right to prevent you from publishing that?  lolololol!  Once she granted the interview, she gave up any right to confidentiality.  Does she believe just because the result was unfavorable to her that she has a right to prevent the publisher from using his work? 

Apparently, she doesn't know anything about blockchain, and she doesn't know anything about PR law either.  Poor girl. 

OMG!  And some people wonder why women don't get involved with bitcoin.  What a fucking pig. 

I have no reason to believe it was not real, Chris DeRose, one of the guys that did the podcast/interview, tweetet the image first (https://twitter.com/derosetech/status/743932647265681408).

Listening to the interview, it's pretty clear she's in over her head..


Wow.. Thanks for the link btw.

My god she's hard to listen to.. So many words, so little content.

This just proves how much more sophisticated Canada is than Australia.  Australia will listen to any dope when trying to figure out bitcoin and Canada gets the sharpest tool in the shed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUNGFZDO8mM (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUNGFZDO8mM) 

The difference and contrast between these two hearings is striking. 

Yes, entitled and privileged women absolutely believe that they have the right to retroactively withdraw consent... until they are informed otherwise by authority.

What a shame.  It seemed like we had a real nice lady in the community.  Then she had to go and run down the idiot path.  Damn shame.  She might be able to wow an Australian politician with buzzwords - but most people in this community don't really get easily tricked by such things.  Good luck to her in her next gig.  Hope she goes there with somewhat better integrity.

That's what politicians do: lots of talk, little content!

Talk... talk... talk but with no real relevance or actual content, she gets paid to do this?

Looks great but doesn't know shit.  :(

Well, then stop listening to her and look at her.

Precisely. Generally, when women talk, this is all I hear: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HFiMXZiLAs

Let's not be a bunch of misogynist assholes.

We should not be discussing her gender, at all, and it discredits our movement when Bitcoiners do so. The primary issue is the degree to which she is loyal to banks and the government. As a matter of fact, those enemies of Bitcoin are majority MEN. Focusing on her gender reinforces the idea that the tech community has a misogyny problem and makes traditional finance and government look pro-equality by comparison.

That's probably her plan, actually. Don't fall for it

I though we weren't supposed to address gender.  Then you go and do it.  WTF?

Just wanted to point out the absurdity of linking her womanhood to her participation in the private blockchain movement: there doesn't appear to be any correlation between the two. Maybe I should have just said that.

Yeah, I think the interviewer was laughing more at her stupidity than her womanhood.  Indeed, she was the sexist one by first bringing up sex/gender in her nasty tweet (first one).  Turns out she is the sexist one.  

This tweet is pure sexist bullshit:
https://anonmgur.com/up2/024939636451cfa9a9122e72cd2424a6.png

This became a man / woman thing because of her comments.  Those guys never had any beef with her being female - they only disagreed with her being dumb.  Then she goes and declares that all this is because they are 'men'.  

I gotta say, that is bullshit.

I'd like her to apologize for this.  This sexism behavior of hers is damaging to the community.  She should withdraw those comments and apologize to the community for having done that.  It was unfair and unwarranted and it draws further divide between all members of the bitcoin community.   

We can call her on all of that without posting pictures of her body on the Internet. Doing so leaves a bad impression impression of the Bitcoin community on women who visit this forum. Now people are gonna point and say we're objectifying her, which makes it harder for us to spread Bitcoin love.

When you decorate your tits with sparkly sequins and push them up high for all to see, and when you strut around on a runway in a bikini competition you pretty much give up your right to claim others are objectifying women.  She posted those pictures on the Internet.  She wore that bikini in a beauty competition.  I am not sure you can dump that on the bad behavior of guys.  But, whatever you say is good by me.  

I think that The Bitcoin Co-op has a point here. Big part of politics in the US is follows neo-progressive narratives that would make the bitcoin community seem unwelcome to women. You'd simply be following the feminist example by calling all women incompetent though, in the exact same way in which feminists assess that "all men are sexist". Such statements simply can not be true as they're nothing more than generalizations. Is Perianne Boring clueless when it comes to bitcoin? Sure! She advertised outright scams like Garza's ventures through her Chamber of Digital Commerce, this must have been a direct result of a mix of greed and incompetence in both finance and bitcoin's technical side. But is this proof that all women in bitcoin are incompetent? Of course not. It's easy to falsify such a statement with a single example while proving such a thing is virtually impossible.

I think if she dressed that way at her Summit or posted those pictures on Bitcoin channels like this forum, I'd call her on it. Until then, it's safest from a strategic PR perspective to avoid the subject of sexuality, because men usually lose debates that involve it. All you married guys know what I'm talking about ;)

wow just fucking wow....

lol I listened to the episode and yes they were a bit hard on her but she put herself out there. They gave her every opportunity to show them that she wasn't full of crap and wasn't using talking points and BUZZWORDS to sound like she knew what she was talking about.

At the end they basically said "We dont think you know anything about Bitcoin or blockchain technology to be in the position to make decisions that you are supposedly making"

Now she is trying to play the victim of "harassment"?

Lady, you agreed to participate in the interview which you knew was RECORDED....lol

yeah seems to be a recurring theme of QUANTITY vs QUALITY

Just need ear plugs and sunglasses.

Yeah, at least her sequined decorated tits are both QUANTITY and QUALITY.  You'd have to admit she has that going for her.

Oh, look what we have here... a Crusader.

You need to worry about and speak for only yourself and take your blue pill mangina self and shove your feminism up your ass, then go fuck yourself.

That said, I said "Generally" for a reason. It's certainly the overwhelming vast majority of them.

This is probably a result of your very low intellect.  When you can't understand things, your brain just fills in with 'Whaw-wwa-whha'
Don't waste time trying to get an education, you are most certainly beyond any hope. 

I understand that when experienced, confident and assertive men speak general inconvenient truths about women, other "men" who can get none (or are terrified of losing one that are barely holding onto) start white knighting, playing Captain Save-a-Ho.

Yep.  As dumb as Perianne is, I'd rather have her on my team than that douchebag of shit.

I agree that she is really clueless about BTC and the blockchain and shouldn't be talking about either, but some of the attacks on twitter were vicious and misogynistic, and quite unacceptable to be honest

Oh man! This is hilarious!

Thanks for sharing!

It remind me of Miss Teen South Carolina: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj3iNxZ8Dww

It has nothing to do with gender, half of this forum is quite stupid and I'm pretty sure they're dudes. :D

boringgg!  :D

is there any transcript of it?
the audio is really bad and and i just cannot understand most of it (i'm not from english country)

I have never heard someone talk so much and say so little.

Don't worry, even if you were from an English country and spoke perfect Queen's English, there is nothing in there to understand.  Put a bunch of rocks in a large tin can and shake it up vigorously.  You'll get about the same meaning out of that.

Not much point on transcribing this interview, Perianne didn't say anything valuable aside of making goofy statements like saying that ACH and SWIFT are blockchains. If you want a summary, someone on reddit summarized  (http://Perianne)her goofs on the podcast.

Dunno, but I hope so. It'd just give Chris Derose ground to make fun of her even more.

Has she left the scene completely?