Perianne Boring of Chamber of Digital Commerce knows nothing about bitcoin

[Bitware]

Talk... talk... talk but with no real relevance or actual content, she gets paid to do this?

Looks great but doesn't know shit. 

Well, then stop listening to her and look at her.

Precisely. Generally, when women talk, this is all I hear: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HFiMXZiLAs

[TKeenan]

Talk... talk... talk but with no real relevance or actual content, she gets paid to do this?

Looks great but doesn't know shit. 

Well, then stop listening to her and look at her.

Precisely. Generally, when certain women talk, this is all I hear: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HFiMXZiLAs

Let's not be a bunch of misogynist assholes.

[The Bitcoin Co-op]

We should not be discussing her gender, at all, and it discredits our movement when Bitcoiners do so. The primary issue is the degree to which she is loyal to banks and the government. As a matter of fact, those enemies of Bitcoin are majority MEN. Focusing on her gender reinforces the idea that the tech community has a misogyny problem and makes traditional finance and government look pro-equality by comparison.

That's probably her plan, actually. Don't fall for it

[TKeenan]

those enemies of Bitcoin are majority MEN.

I though we weren't supposed to address gender.  Then you go and do it.  WTF?

[The Bitcoin Co-op]

those enemies of Bitcoin are majority MEN.

I though we weren't supposed to address gender.  Then you go and do it.  WTF?

Just wanted to point out the absurdity of linking her womanhood to her participation in the private blockchain movement: there doesn't appear to be any correlation between the two. Maybe I should have just said that.

[TKeenan]

those enemies of Bitcoin are majority MEN.

I though we weren't supposed to address gender.  Then you go and do it.  WTF?

Just wanted to point out the absurdity of linking her womanhood to her participation in the private blockchain movement: there doesn't appear to be any correlation between the two. Maybe I should have just said that.

Yeah, I think the interviewer was laughing more at her stupidity than her womanhood.  Indeed, she was the sexist one by first bringing up sex/gender in her nasty tweet (first one).  Turns out she is the sexist one.  

This tweet is pure sexist bullshit:


This became a man / woman thing because of her comments.  Those guys never had any beef with her being female - they only disagreed with her being dumb.  Then she goes and declares that all this is because they are 'men'.  

I gotta say, that is bullshit.

I'd like her to apologize for this.  This sexism behavior of hers is damaging to the community.  She should withdraw those comments and apologize to the community for having done that.  It was unfair and unwarranted and it draws further divide between all members of the bitcoin community.   

[The Bitcoin Co-op]

those enemies of Bitcoin are majority MEN.

I though we weren't supposed to address gender.  Then you go and do it.  WTF?

Just wanted to point out the absurdity of linking her womanhood to her participation in the private blockchain movement: there doesn't appear to be any correlation between the two. Maybe I should have just said that.

Yeah, I think the interviewer was laughing more at her stupidity than her womanhood.  Indeed, she was the sexist one by first bringing up sex/gender in her nasty tweet (first one).  Turns out she is the sexist one.  

This tweet is pure sexist bullshit:


This became a man / woman thing because of her comments.  Those guys never had any beef with her being female - they only disagreed with her being dumb.  Then she goes and declares that all this is because they are 'men'.  

I gotta say, that is bullshit.

I'd like her to apologize for this.  This sexism behavior of hers is damaging to the community.  She should withdraw those comments and apologize to the community for having done that.  It was unfair and unwarranted and it draws further divide between all members of the bitcoin community.   

We can call her on all of that without posting pictures of her body on the Internet. Doing so leaves a bad impression impression of the Bitcoin community on women who visit this forum. Now people are gonna point and say we're objectifying her, which makes it harder for us to spread Bitcoin love.

[TKeenan]

those enemies of Bitcoin are majority MEN.

I though we weren't supposed to address gender.  Then you go and do it.  WTF?

Just wanted to point out the absurdity of linking her womanhood to her participation in the private blockchain movement: there doesn't appear to be any correlation between the two. Maybe I should have just said that.

Yeah, I think the interviewer was laughing more at her stupidity than her womanhood.  Indeed, she was the sexist one by first bringing up sex/gender in her nasty tweet (first one).  Turns out she is the sexist one.  

This tweet is pure sexist bullshit:


This became a man / woman thing because of her comments.  Those guys never had any beef with her being female - they only disagreed with her being dumb.  Then she goes and declares that all this is because they are 'men'.  

I gotta say, that is bullshit.

I'd like her to apologize for this.  This sexism behavior of hers is damaging to the community.  She should withdraw those comments and apologize to the community for having done that.  It was unfair and unwarranted and it draws further divide between all members of the bitcoin community.  

We can call her on all of that without posting pictures of her body on the Internet. Doing so leaves a bad impression impression of the Bitcoin community on women who visit this forum. Now people are gonna point and say we're objectifying her, which makes it harder for us to spread Bitcoin love.

When you decorate your tits with sparkly sequins and push them up high for all to see, and when you strut around on a runway in a bikini competition you pretty much give up your right to claim others are objectifying women.  She posted those pictures on the Internet.  She wore that bikini in a beauty competition.  I am not sure you can dump that on the bad behavior of guys.  But, whatever you say is good by me.  

[alani123]

those enemies of Bitcoin are majority MEN.

I though we weren't supposed to address gender.  Then you go and do it.  WTF?

Just wanted to point out the absurdity of linking her womanhood to her participation in the private blockchain movement: there doesn't appear to be any correlation between the two. Maybe I should have just said that.

Yeah, I think the interviewer was laughing more at her stupidity than her womanhood.  Indeed, she was the sexist one by first bringing up sex/gender in her nasty tweet (first one).  Turns out she is the sexist one.  

This tweet is pure sexist bullshit:


This became a man / woman thing because of her comments.  Those guys never had any beef with her being female - they only disagreed with her being dumb.  Then she goes and declares that all this is because they are 'men'.  

I gotta say, that is bullshit.

I'd like her to apologize for this.  This sexism behavior of hers is damaging to the community.  She should withdraw those comments and apologize to the community for having done that.  It was unfair and unwarranted and it draws further divide between all members of the bitcoin community.  

We can call her on all of that without posting pictures of her body on the Internet. Doing so leaves a bad impression impression of the Bitcoin community on women who visit this forum. Now people are gonna point and say we're objectifying her, which makes it harder for us to spread Bitcoin love.

When you decorate your tits with sparkly sequins and push them up high for all to see, and when you strut around on a runway in a bikini competition you pretty much give up your right to claim others are objectifying women.  She posted those pictures on the Internet.  She wore that bikini in a beauty competition.  I am not sure you can dump that on the bad behavior of guys.  But, whatever you say is good by me.

I think that The Bitcoin Co-op has a point here. Big part of politics in the US is follows neo-progressive narratives that would make the bitcoin community seem unwelcome to women. You'd simply be following the feminist example by calling all women incompetent though, in the exact same way in which feminists assess that "all men are sexist". Such statements simply can not be true as they're nothing more than generalizations. Is Perianne Boring clueless when it comes to bitcoin? Sure! She advertised outright scams like Garza's ventures through her Chamber of Digital Commerce, this must have been a direct result of a mix of greed and incompetence in both finance and bitcoin's technical side. But is this proof that all women in bitcoin are incompetent? Of course not. It's easy to falsify such a statement with a single example while proving such a thing is virtually impossible.

[The Bitcoin Co-op]

those enemies of Bitcoin are majority MEN.

I though we weren't supposed to address gender.  Then you go and do it.  WTF?

Just wanted to point out the absurdity of linking her womanhood to her participation in the private blockchain movement: there doesn't appear to be any correlation between the two. Maybe I should have just said that.

Yeah, I think the interviewer was laughing more at her stupidity than her womanhood.  Indeed, she was the sexist one by first bringing up sex/gender in her nasty tweet (first one).  Turns out she is the sexist one.  

This tweet is pure sexist bullshit:


This became a man / woman thing because of her comments.  Those guys never had any beef with her being female - they only disagreed with her being dumb.  Then she goes and declares that all this is because they are 'men'.  

I gotta say, that is bullshit.

I'd like her to apologize for this.  This sexism behavior of hers is damaging to the community.  She should withdraw those comments and apologize to the community for having done that.  It was unfair and unwarranted and it draws further divide between all members of the bitcoin community.  

We can call her on all of that without posting pictures of her body on the Internet. Doing so leaves a bad impression impression of the Bitcoin community on women who visit this forum. Now people are gonna point and say we're objectifying her, which makes it harder for us to spread Bitcoin love.

When you decorate your tits with sparkly sequins and push them up high for all to see, and when you strut around on a runway in a bikini competition you pretty much give up your right to claim others are objectifying women.  She posted those pictures on the Internet.  She wore that bikini in a beauty competition.  I am not sure you can dump that on the bad behavior of guys.  But, whatever you say is good by me.  

I think if she dressed that way at her Summit or posted those pictures on Bitcoin channels like this forum, I'd call her on it. Until then, it's safest from a strategic PR perspective to avoid the subject of sexuality, because men usually lose debates that involve it. All you married guys know what I'm talking about

[smoothie]

She's also really insecure:

https://wp.stakepool.com/2016/06/18/perianne-boring-threatening-lawsuit-over-her-disasterous-interview-on-bitcoin-uncensored/
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4olwor/perianne_boring_of_digital_chamber_of_commerce/

wow just fucking wow....

lol I listened to the episode and yes they were a bit hard on her but she put herself out there. They gave her every opportunity to show them that she wasn't full of crap and wasn't using talking points and BUZZWORDS to sound like she knew what she was talking about.

At the end they basically said "We dont think you know anything about Bitcoin or blockchain technology to be in the position to make decisions that you are supposedly making"

Now she is trying to play the victim of "harassment"?

Lady, you agreed to participate in the interview which you knew was RECORDED....lol

[smoothie]

My god she's hard to listen to.. So many words, so little content.

yeah seems to be a recurring theme of QUANTITY vs QUALITY

[smoothie]

Talk... talk... talk but with no real relevance or actual content, she gets paid to do this?

Looks great but doesn't know shit. 

Well, then stop listening to her and look at her.

Just need ear plugs and sunglasses.

[TKeenan]

My god she's hard to listen to.. So many words, so little content.

yeah seems to be a recurring theme of QUANTITY vs QUALITY

Yeah, at least her sequined decorated tits are both QUANTITY and QUALITY.  You'd have to admit she has that going for her.

[Bitware]

Talk... talk... talk but with no real relevance or actual content, she gets paid to do this?

Looks great but doesn't know shit.  

Well, then stop listening to her and look at her.

Precisely. Generally, when certain women talk, this is all I hear: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HFiMXZiLAs

Let's not be a bunch of misogynist assholes.

Oh, look what we have here... a Crusader.

You need to worry about and speak for only yourself and take your blue pill mangina self and shove your feminism up your ass, then go fuck yourself.

That said, I said "Generally" for a reason. It's certainly the overwhelming vast majority of them.

[DGulari]

Talk... talk... talk but with no real relevance or actual content, she gets paid to do this?

Looks great but doesn't know shit.  

Well, then stop listening to her and look at her.

Precisely. Generally, when certain women talk, this is all I hear: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HFiMXZiLAs

Let's not be a bunch of misogynist assholes.

Oh, look what we have here... a Crusader.

You need to worry about and speak for only yourself and take your blue pill mangina self and shove your feminism up your ass, then go fuck yourself.

That said, I said "Generally" for a reason. It's certainly the overwhelming vast majority of them.

This is probably a result of your very low intellect.  When you can't understand things, your brain just fills in with 'Whaw-wwa-whha'
Don't waste time trying to get an education, you are most certainly beyond any hope. 

[Bitware]

Talk... talk... talk but with no real relevance or actual content, she gets paid to do this?

Looks great but doesn't know shit.  

Well, then stop listening to her and look at her.

Precisely. Generally, when certain women talk, this is all I hear: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HFiMXZiLAs

Let's not be a bunch of misogynist assholes.

Oh, look what we have here... a Crusader.

You need to worry about and speak for only yourself and take your blue pill mangina self and shove your feminism up your ass, then go fuck yourself.

That said, I said "Generally" for a reason. It's certainly the overwhelming vast majority of them.

This is probably a result of your very low intellect.  When you can't understand things, your brain just fills in with 'Whaw-wwa-whha'
Don't waste time trying to get an education, you are most certainly beyond any hope.  

I understand that when experienced, confident and assertive men speak general inconvenient truths about women, other "men" who can get none (or are terrified of losing one that are barely holding onto) start white knighting, playing Captain Save-a-Ho.

[TKeenan]

I understand that when experienced, confident and assertive men speak general inconvenient truths about women, other "men" who can get none (or are terrified of losing one that are barely holding onto) start white knighting, playing Captain Save-a-Ho.

Or they're just trying to help you stop being such an embarrassing douche.
A possibility we shouldn't overlook

Yep.  As dumb as Perianne is, I'd rather have her on my team than that douchebag of shit.

[Divinespark]

I agree that she is really clueless about BTC and the blockchain and shouldn't be talking about either, but some of the attacks on twitter were vicious and misogynistic, and quite unacceptable to be honest

[pedrog]

Oh man! This is hilarious!

Thanks for sharing!

It remind me of Miss Teen South Carolina: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj3iNxZ8Dww

It has nothing to do with gender, half of this forum is quite stupid and I'm pretty sure they're dudes.