Bitcoin Forum

I'm thrilled to announce a new feature of TheBitcoinStrip.com.

Statistics for everybody. (https://thebitcoinstrip.com/stats.html#2015-01-01-to-2016-06-23)

https://i.imgur.com/gtTzuFS.png

TheBitcoinStrip.com is one of the few honest, authentic Bitcoin casino review websites, as well as a statistics hub and educational portal.


--

https://thebitcoinstrip.com/stats.html#2015-01-01-to-2016-06-23

Interesting site. I don't really know any other sites providing individual statistics for a specific gambling website, so maybe this could help us see what sites are up to :) Some reviews are not that current, but a few are pretty recent. I see some written a year ago, and those might not be as good right now. I probably just enjoy watching people win and lose overall :)

Cool site.  Think you have a bug in your betterbets query though, it shows ~$550B in bets this week which I'm guessing is slightly off :)

This seems to be the coin.dance of bitcoin gambling sites.

I think you need to update the statistics on your site, as I see it is not up to date. For example, luckyb.it total wagered is in fact more than 100k btc wagered but on your site is only 71k btc wagered. Too big differences imo, I think it is because you made this site since few months ago and just launched it now without updating the statistics.

Luckybit stats are four months off. I'll fix the crawler for that soon.

I didn't make this site a few months ago... It has been alive and collecting data every 30 minutes since late 2014.

Are you sure stats are correct? The 351 bets per second (for all casinos) is off, MoneyPot alone does over 100 bets a second (and I'm sure PD does at the very least a similar # of bets per second).

Edit:  The leaderboard is also off, BetterBets is being excluded from weekly/monthly wagered.

2nd Edit: I see you are adding it currently.

Awesome review site by the way, very user friendly, also nice to see stats on other casinos outside of the ~10 or so on dicesites :)

The casino statistics is a really cool feature. I'm really surprised at some of the figures, like 351 bets per second (seems like it would be more, considering how many people gamble on dice sites with auto bet). Also surprised that the average bet at bustabit is 3000 bits. Always thought it would be closer to the 100 range. I noticed that you listed BetKing.io as PocketRocketsCasino, but they have rebranded to BetKing.io. Might be good to change that to avoid confusion.

I always loved this site.... We tried contacting the original owner a while ago to update CasinoBitco.in to "BitcoinRush.io"  as we rebranded in 2015 but it never panned out... maybe we can try again ;)

Thanks for the feedback. The statistics are correct, but they don't include casinos that don't report their statistics, or any casinos that aren't listed on the strip.


I will add it. :-) Thanks for the feedback.

The LuckyBit stats are updated now. Here is the link for LuckyBit's stats: https://thebitcoinstrip.com/stats/2014-12-21-to-2016-06-23/s

Will you include crypto-games in statistics and update the review/feautures we offer? Also stats are not updating, but it shows it was updated 10 minutes ago.

I fixed the stats. I noticed you updated the website. Would you like us to review it again? :-)

Really great site, but I don't understand why you're doing these reviews. Detailed reviews like yours cost a bunch. Is there any vested interest in these certain gambling sites?

Sure, you can help with this post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1509214.msg15185378#msg15185378

I take commission from casino affiliate programs to pay for expenses.

thx for all the efforts and the casino listing. will you update this list? in case you will please let me draw your attention to >

BetterBets Casino > Provably Fair > Invest Option > Faucet and thats correct

please look now at the following casinos and what is written there

LuckyBit Derby

Sharpdice

Dust Dice

JackpotRacer (not anymore uptodate)

InvestDice (disabled and changed to Bit-Exo)

Quantum Dice

Bit-Exo

all those casinos should have same written as it is written for
BetterBets > Provably Fair > Invest Option > Faucet

the reason is that they are all powered by Moneypot.com and they enjoy exactly the same conditions
> Provably Fair > Invest Option > Faucet

I hope this helps

keep up the good work

Hey guys,

You definitely has something wrong with wagered stats. Currently you show BitDice at 2100BTC for the past 7 days, which is like on 4000BTC less than actual wagered amount, you can see that dicesites.com shows it right.

Also you have several casino's that are out of existence :)

Regards,
Alex.

A nice site, well made OP, just update it always. You can make some good refs because of this, 8)

Thanks  :)

How come eh casinoes have such different returns ? One is 2.4% one is 35% and one is 100% these are all with 1x Kelly. How come its so different ? Can I really make 100% ? Is the calculator I used right ?

Under-funded casinos with disproportionate turnover are the most attractive to invest in. Every casino has a different size bankroll and a varying volume, so the return is different for each.

@TheBitcoinStrip.com

as I see you answered now 2 other postings after mine I need to ask you if you are ignoring my posting?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1523281.msg15332867#msg15332867 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1523281.msg15332867#msg15332867)

What's up, man?

please read the link in above posting. your description of almost all Moneypot apps are wrong and it would be very much appreciated if you could correct those mistakes.

thx

I don't quite understand the post. Is the problem that "faucet" should be "Yes" for all of those?

please let me explain. all those casinos are powered by Moneypot.com that means all are using same  Bank Roll, same faucet and Moneypot Provably Fair option. so all those options should be shown for all the casinos I mentioned cause they are all powered by Moneypot

investDice is disabled and should not be on your list


regarding our casino I would invite you to visit our casino so you can see the difference to the jackpotracer you advertised there.

thank you again for the good work and I hope I could explain it now better and in case that not please feel free to ask

thx

Oh, yeah. I understand that all these casinos are powered by moneypot so they use a shared bankroll and all that, but currently the software treats them as individual casinos, so the details may not always be exactly the same all the time. I don't see it as an important issue though, so I'm just going to leave it. It would require some big code changes to synchronise them all.

Thanks for bringing it to my attention though. :) I'll update the info soon.

thank you for the understanding. I fully understand that if it is a lot of coding involved that you cant do it maybe that soon but to be frank that you don't see it as much important that does not mean that we see it same :)

for us it is yes very important that users don't get the wrong picture about all those casinos and especially about our casino. maybe those other casinos don't care that much as we so we would appreciate if you can't change as you said in near future the code and output  please delete our casino (jackpotracer.com) from your list

thx

I'm a bit confused. What do you see as the big issue exactly? The casinos are still individual casinos with seperate websites, communities, designs, games, etc. The only similarity is that they share the same bankroll because of the fact that they are powered by the Moneypot framework. What's the problem?

sorry if I caused any confusion. yes the casinos are
individual casinos
seperate websites (own domains)
different design

but same community and players cause they need to register with Moneypot.com
same Bank Roll
same Faucet
same Provably Fair

to me it looks like that you did not yet understand the Moneypot business model. what I mean is that you can't praise BetterBets that they have invest option, faucet and provably fair and our casino (or also the others) are only provably fair

but we have also invest option and faucet because all is delivered by Moneypot.com

and if you can't add those important points (for us important) soon as you stated we would like to ask you to take our casino off this list and add it whenever you are ready

thx

LOL jealousy at its high limit, just because you and betterbets are using moneypot doesnt mean that this site should be giving you the same courtesy as they gave to betterbets. Admit it and look with your own eyes, betterbets is one of the most popular sites currently and yours are crap

@Bitcoinstrip : just take them out of your list, one less unimportant casino that will fill your database anyway

yea was waiting for your posting lel and thx for showing us your signature and now you get another 0.00013 lel

as I asked Op to take us off the list you don't need to ask for us and that only shows that you are hunting us with your pointless postings. we will report you to your sig manager and he should take you off the sig campaign list. you are not the first who will lose the sig after we reported it

you should read my posting and not jump in with hate

I asked the OP to add to our casino and to other MP casinos here listed that they offer
Invest option
Faucet
Provably Fair

as all MP apps/casino offering this

I did not ask the OP to add "highly Rated" that is written next to BB

and if you like it or not BB is using MP like we and all other hundreds of apps

All you can do is write a huge number of words in this forum however if you are so smart and all, do it yourself . All you can do is keep on asking and all , also go figure what is wrong and why most people are hating you around here. Figure whats wrong, starting from your silly attitude and be grateful that even bitcoinstrip included your crap casino on their site

I'm a big fan of the idea of this site, from what I've seen this site and dicesites.com are the only two not totally corrupt and shady bitcoin review sites out there.

Out of interest, what is the criteria you use on your homepage to order casinos? Also I'm not sure your leaderboard is totally correct. Currently you're showing in the last 7 days:

* BetterBets ~33425 BTC wagered  (dicesites shows 1249)
* PrimeDice (looks correct enough)
* BitDice.me ~6326.0412 BTC wagered  (looks on the high side, but ok)
* Bustabit 4976.2108 BTC wagered (seems right, exact would be 4896)


Anyway, keep up the good work!

Right.

Right.

Why not?

It doesn't matter how it is achieved; if a casino has provable fairness I will praise it for that. What's the problem with this?

I'm trying to think of something to compare your argument to, to give you a better understanding of what you're trying to convey... It's like saying that I can't praise a site for using HTTPS because they didn't invent the SSL technology. It's like saying I can't say a casino's web design is user-friendly if they used a CSS framework like Bootstrap. It's like saying I can't say a website is fast if they use a CDN like Amazon S3 or CloudFlare. It's a complete non-argument.

Do you understand?

It's not like I haven't mentioned in the review that they use Moneypot's technology, either. (https://i.imgur.com/lPoaatR.png) Although it wouldn't change anything if I didn't.

Great.

Thanks RHavar. I've been having trouble crawling Moneypot-enabled casinos in the past few days. They seem to have added some bot protection since the recent DDoS, and my bot is being caught in it. :( I'll get around it, though, and the numbers will adjust themselves shortly.

As for the ranking criteria on the homepage, it's actually pretty complex and uses mostly arbitrary metrics. It's basically a points system, and the way casinos get points is by having a high rating, a low edge, provable fairness, a cold wallet, anonymity, an invest option, a high max profit, high weekly/monthly/yearly wagered/bet numbers, etc. It's definitely not the most effective system, but whatever.

by agreeing 2 times saying "right" and then saying "why not" it looks like you want to insist that your list is correct. we don't agree and please delete our JackpotRacer from your list. thank you

I refuse.  ;D

Read the rest of my post, lol.

Nice site now we can see all casino sites and i think it will help for most gamblers to know what site is the best to play and what site is popular..

Thanks mate. Glad you like it.

Ah, that makes sense.



I think you might be better off using something like <total wagered> or <total wagered in the $TIMEPERIOD> or something like that. Any ranking that doesn't show the most popular sites at the top, I think is a little flawed. I guess the only problem with showing the most popular casinos first is it helps further entrench them, but I also think that's probably what most players want anyway.  ;D


P.S. save your time and add JackpotRacer to your ignore list, he's incoherent at the best of times

Oh, and you might want to change this to a cumulative chart (or add it underneath):

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/spa/rmczv2tqcr196vz/nzblj87d.png

why didn't you put JackpotRacer to your ignore list? it is time to do it.  I will never put you on ignore cause I enjoy your postings like I enjoy dooglus and NLNico postings

or maybe you can explain why MP casinos/apps should not be treated same in OP's list?

they use all same BR same Faucet and same Provably Fair

that BetterBets is best MP app is undisputed from our side but they use MP BR, Faucet and Provably Fair

if my request to add those points are so incoherent why did OP add it? I can tell you why because he is a fair guy and want to deliver a fair list.

oh sorry for my english

Yep. I agree that the current ranking is flawed, and I'll revise it shortly.


Done. Thanks for the suggestion. That looks much better. Am going to make it start at the correct number (ie. not zero) soon -- it's a bit harder than it sounds.

https://i.imgur.com/rcixICt.png

This site is still managed by user who is deeply involved-invested with Diggit minesweeper site?

They all have differences in variance, there is no way to guarantee a stable income. Sometimes the casino wins more and sometimes the players win more. Usually bigger casinos will tend to have a more precise average income tending to their house edge.

Oh come one learn to grow up atleast, you cant expect to get the same treatment from all those review sites. Eventhough you and Betterbets use the same provably fair, bankroll and other stuff from MP but the amount of effort put to build the site is totally different. Betterbets deserved it, your site dont atleast for now

@bitcoinstrip : this site is still run by oldmate? or was it sold?

This is a really good site. It has everything you could want all at one place. Really a great source of knowledge. It helps to watch the entire market to find out where is the best to invest. Very grateful for this website it looks like it took a lot of hard work.

This is a great site. I would love to try out gambling sites other than Primedice. I love to see how much websites profit or lose from their bankroll. Keep it up thebitcoinstrip.com!!!

@TheBitcoinStrip.com Do u accept pure blockchain based gambling websites? If yes, would u like to include www.BitcoinBetting.website ?

Absolutely mate. I will add it soon :)

Thank you for reaching out!

Just to let u know that we have moved to a new domain https://www.Chain-Bet.com.

I have always loved using bitcoinstrip to check out the stats but apparently it hasn't been updated for long long times. It has a lot of troubles with the website lacking information and definitely not properly manned enough to fix the bugs and issues they are having. It was at its peak the only website where you could see all the information on stats of casinos of bitcoin you ever wanted, I am 100% sure there must be even some casinos that started all because people saw how big casino world in bitcoin is.

I know casinos are not as liked as they used to be now that people prefer trading as a new way of gambling but I honestly remember this place as one of the main reasons to take bitcoin gambling world bigger. It is a legacy website and I hope one day it would be either kept up and updated properly or at least sold to someone who would.