Bitcoin Forum

I got this private message
It was my reply to this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=160162.0

The thread was about bitcoin users having so called "prides" like homosexuals do. And requesting "equality" and "rights", just like the perverts do. As a strong supporter or normal people and normal relationships, I will not tolerate to be part of movement that mimics homosexuals in any way. Or accepts them as "normal" or "acceptable". I fought both homosexuals and police in censored and will do it again if the need arises http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVh5H3mAHuY

Bitcointalk is good in keeping freedom of speech and information. We can discuss many taboo issues, like the Silk Road, bank corruption, black markets or anything else related to these important questions. Censoring one users post because of his attitude towards queers and homos are not acceptable for me.

I agree that your post is on-topic, though the entire topic is pretty pointless. I restored your post and moved the topic to off-topic.

You can discuss whatever you like, however using derogative language contributes nothing to any discussion. I admit it may have been a too harsh of a reaction from me, perhaps I should have edited your post instead of deleted it (the whole thread was ridiculous anyway). However I would urge you to keep in mind that not everyone shares your views and that this forums is not your living room. If you want to belittle, shame and bully certain people, do it within your own four walls but on a public forum which is a private property you will watch your language towards other people.

I totally agree that the topic was nonsense. I don't know is it plain troll topic or someone really think it is a way for cryptocurrencies to gain publicity and adoption. If so, it will be good way for cryptocurrency users look not only geeky and criminal but homo as well!

I will use the language that is appropriate to describe them. If some person is killing other people, he is killer. I can call him killer, despite word "killer" having bad meaning. If someone is having same sex action, he is either fag or queer. There really is not need to find "nicer" words for such persons. I don't need for everyone to share my views, but I hate when one view (queer view) have given advantage by censoring and deleting opposing views.

No one censored you. A user wrote a report and I decided he was right.


And I'm not making anything up either and I couldn't care less for guys sucking dicks, but this is what the dictionary says about the words you used:
fag·got
2 [fag-uht]
noun
Slang: Disparaging and Offensive. a male homosexual.


Gay, queer, homosexual = cool

faggot = offensive and not cool and belongs in the same category as nigger and other such derogatory words that are used mainly to belittle and verbally attack and hurt people with certain kind of dispositions for which they can't help themselves for having.


Also killer is not offensive in the least since such a person had the option to not kill and it's an awful analogy to make and I think gives people reading this pointless whining a pretty good sense of what sort of a person you are. And this will be the last I'll comment on this matter.

Oh the horror.  Gay people use Bitcoin.  So do furries.  So do drug users.  So do pornographers.  No doubt some paedophiles do as well.

You might want to live in a world where only white heterosexual libertarians are associated with Bitcoin but it's not the reality.  If you want to believe it is, maybe you should set up a Bitcoin sub-forum on Stormfront 'cos you don't get to control who or what Bitcoin is associated with.  I'd prefer it wasn't associated with bigotry, but your post dashes that hope.

Sorry, the dictionary is clearly biased. Not a good reference at all.

I don't know what urges they have, but it is actions that make them homo, not desires alone. I also want to rape 15 year old girl but I will never act upon my urges to do such bad things. We are humans and we can do what is right and suppress what is wrong. They chose not only secretly engage in perversion, but they stick this in all others faces. This is when from simple ridicule of homos the things get violent.I don't care. They are just another nodes and anonymous tx. Probably only furries are on same level with gay people but the furries have not made moves for them being accepted as "normal" part of society and there is no laws protecting furries as exclusive group. And when I was 23 I fell in love with 16 year old girl. But she told me she is 20 and looked as such. I'm now totally pedophile by the law.

I'm not libertarian but share some of the views with them. I prefer the don't tell don't ask approach. If someone who is in Bitcoin wants to come out as a successful SR seller or homosexual porn distributor, it will not surprise me at all. Actually it is very likely that each of the nodes connected to me are not ordinary people at all.

Wow. Homosexuality is two consenting adults doing something they want to do. Raping a girl (no matter the age) is forcing yourself on another against their will and without their consent, which is wrong in any society that values personal liberty and rights. Not even close to the same thing.

This flamebait post is clearly working.

This is the best troll thread I've ever seen in Meta. I bow my head and ask that you please teach me, master.

This is extremely liberal viewpoint. From such viewpoint also necrophilia, sadomasochism, zoophilia and sexual cannibalism are acceptable things. Consent actions or not this does not change that same sex relationships are totally unnatural and should not be tolerated as part of society.In my opinion raping girl is more natural, but still very wrong thing to do. Nothing to do with me. The "Bitcoin pride" thread author and one of forum admins made me to open this thread. They are the master trolls http://fc03.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2011/091/4/4/troll_flag_by_romanticdetective-d3cyld7.jpg

They "made" you? I assume that only a large-bore pistol pointed right at your face could force you to do something against your will, and based on your previous posts, I doubt even that would work for some things...

So who held a gun to your head and forced you to post this in here?

They did not "made" it by pointing gun at me and forcing to post. The "bitcoin pride" made me to post the rhetoric question about fags and someone in charge of forum made me to open this thread about censoring anti-homosexual speech.

It is very welcome that my post got restored. The homosexuals are very sensitive against criticism because they are not man enough to just ignore it. That does not mean the normal people should resort to censorship just to please few persons with deviant sexual behavior.

For someone so apparently ruggedly individualist, you seem to surrender your autonomy rather easily. Just by writing the words "bitcoin pride," for instance, seems to have turned you into a puppet, posting against your own will.

I admit, I surrendered my autonomy by posting as a member of this forum community. I'm addicted, I cannot resist my urges to participate there :)

Seriously, what is best action - speaking against something that is unacceptable or just remaining silent on the issue? If we as a people make our voices heard more often, many problems in society would not exist or will be less severe. I'm not talking about homosexuals right now.

Hmmm... it is hard to find a f*ck to give about what other people do with their penises and vaginae.

Politicians like to make inconsequential things like this the focus of debate...

Own your actions... "I posted in response to" instead of "They made me post." ;)

My English is somewhat limited.There was no homosexuality until the homos came out with demands of equality and "protection". And I don't want to see any gay prides in my country. No strange looking people of unknown gender or half naked sadomasochists jerking off in streets.Actually politicians try to speak about homosexual problem as less as possible because about 90% of population don't like them. They try to silently pass the laws regarding homosexuals and other related things and not provoking the society. It is relevant if we and our kids will live in world where love exists or where love are reduced and redefined to include pervert sexual deviations.

You don't see the problem with this statement?

If they didn't exist before they came out, who, then, came out?

They were like serial killers or zoophiles. They always existed hidden from society and were not considered "normal" by people and were disliked. The homosexuals are such a small minority that their existence did not matter for people. What they do when nobody knows about it were not problem, the problem came when they came out and started to require to be accepted as normal part of society.

Not up on your Greek (especially Spartan) history, are you?

The past human history have many things that are unacceptable in our society. Think about cannibalism in much recent history. Do You want to sit in restaurant with your girlfriend and watch how cannibal eats human flesh at the table next to you? Or live in neighbors with necrophile? Humans are capable of many sick things, should we be forced to accept them just like we are forced to accept homosexuals?

you seem quite angry with homosexuals.

is there a reason why you don't like them? the "its not natural"-response does not cut it. there is a lot of stuff that is unnatural(computers, money, midgets, ...)

did they hurt you in anyway?

Homosexuals are liars. They lie about their numbers and prevalence of homosexuality and bisexuality in society. They look and act like freaks. They use politicians to advance their cause. The same politicians are hostile against national and sovereign state.computers and money are tools. Humans make and use tools for tasks they need. Midgets are mistake of nature. If they ever decide to request special right or form false midget ideology like homosexuals did, they will be on same line as homosexuals.I managed to hurt few of them but did not get caught. All that they were capable is to use secret police and corrupt court system to harass me for more than 5 years just for openly speaking against homosexuals in public. I'm really angry on them and if when the current political system collapses, they will be used as target practice. Pederasty and lesbianism were crime here until early 1990-ties and will be again, his time with much harsher punishments.

I must say, you sure come off across as batshit insane.

so because people have a different opinion about what is natural, you hurt them?

i know a lot of gay people, and they are generally not liars or freaks(well maybe when drunk, but whos not?)

should drugs be allowed, they are altering your body in unatural ways?

And yet, it was completely acceptable in ancient Greek society. Perhaps the modern unacceptability of homosexuality is the perversion, forced upon humanity by the Catholic Church?

Well, leaving aside the fact that if I were to go to a restaurant that served human flesh, I would most likely be eating it as well, I would imagine that in a restaurant setting, I would be unable to discern whether the man was eating pork, or long pork.

I see no harm in living next to someone who likes his girlfriends colder than normal. As long as he doesn't stink up the neighborhood with his exes.

If it's not harming you, I don't see where you have the room to bitch.

When there is no other options, yes! And this is not about opinions, it is about homosexual practice.The drug use should be decriminalized. And drug users don't challenge the fundamental order of society and junkies are not considered "normal people" and there are no pressure upon society to accept junkies as equal members of society.I don't personally know any gay people. The public gay spokespersons are ugly unattractive women or freaky gay man (so called pidorasi) and judging from gay pride, they are the most "normal" ones. I would not risk in Your place getting drunk and passing out around any of them. The single intimate touch by another man probably can cause me vomit. And being drunk relaxes control on behavior, there are numerous occasions when girls getting touched and stripped by drunk friends.

Just confirming my thoughts about the craziness....

No, also muslims are against homosexuals and often stone or hang them when possible. And take into consideration soviet union. The atheism was official government and ideological position. But homosexuals were imprisoned like other criminals. It really is nothing to do with religion. The most sound opponents of homosexuality are religious people, but many of protesters are non-religious or atheistic like me.So You think that eating human flesh is natural and You are OK with that? Or it is something unnatural and taboo that should not happen?And believe me, they will abandon ex-girlfriends in neighborhood. And if You will protest against his necrophiliac practice, You will be declared intolerant and necrophobic! It is something to do with peoples sanity, both homosexualism and necrophilia, and insane people have other oddities like hoarding or disregard about other people. Homosexuals for example have them too. The exhibitionistic gay prides and urge to dress and look like freak not normal people.They are harming entire definition of best thing in world - Love. Love are between man and women without any variations. Homosexuals are like people who try to fundamentally change Bitcoin rules. Both Love and Bitcoin are concepts, they must be clearly defined to be valuable. Society with homosexuals must do the same as Bitcoin network must do with nodes who try to change the rules.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion :
Criteria for categorizing something as a opinion:
1. subjective
2. in-absolute certainty. (fuck yeah! quadruple negations!)
3. result of emotion.
4. interpretation of facts

homosexuals considers love(a emotion) between people of the same gender natural(in-absolute certainty).

Conclusion:
it is indeed a matter of opinion.

Now using your own logic, i could beat you with a baseball bat, and shove it up your ass when you are laying bleeding and defenceless on the ground, because i don't like the way you treat other people(you have a different opinion then me).

weed is a drug. alcohol is a drug. weed smokers and drinkers are considered normal people.
drugs are messing with your body(FACT!), and are therefor unnatural.

again by your own logic -> KILL ALL THE WEED SMOKERS, AND DRUNK PEOPLE!

are you saying you lack empirical evidence?

"ugly unattractive women", did she have short hair?
"pidoras", offensive slang for gay.
"gay pride", a festival/event where people that are a part of a sexual minority have a chance of showing the world how happy they are.

have you seen carnivals where the dancers have those really long feathers and all kind of shiny stuff on, while they are trying to shake their ass off.
 
done that many times, have even slept with one of them.

i feel sad for you, because you are unable to recognize a beautiful thing.

are you flat out saying its okay to do things to people against their will, because they are drunk?

I think he is trying to provoke you with social constructivism.
It is centered around "if everyone is doing it, it must be okay.", which your posts suggest that you are a advocate for.

Tell me where the bad man touched you?

Ah. I see, it's merely people who would like to assert their control over other people. Catholics, Muslims, Communists, and You. A regular rainbow connection.

I think it is wrong for a person to be killed for food, but then, I feel it is wrong for a person to be killed in anything but defense, anyway. If a person sells his body to the meat processing plant, and someone wants to buy it, I see no point where someone was wronged or did anything "unnatural."

Which is why I would protest against his dumping of the exes in the neighborhood, not his necrophilia.

Oh, I see. It's offending you. So Sorry. You don't have the right to not be offended. I prefer Heinlein's definition of "love":

Marriage, perhaps, can be defined as only between a man and a woman, but love knows no such distinctions.

Even if homos consider that to be definition for love, this does not mean they are not wrong. In simplified words it is like computer software who gives unexpected and wrong result with the same inputs.You can try to do that, but there is no guarantee I will not manage to slash you with my knife in the process. I bet there are homosexuals who are talking about "tolerance" in front of cameras but in same time want to beat to death the anti-gay protesters.They are not considered equal in many societies.I repeat, if weed smokers (like myself on some occasions) and alcohol drinkers (like me) try to change society using big lies and diplomatic intervention from foreign nations or entities, then shoot them. I cannot imagine how junkies or alcoholics can start to have "stoned days" or "drunk days" in heart of our capital city and be protected from angry mob by police. Or critics labelled "ganjafobes" "alcoholicphobes" or "xenofobes". Alcohol makes you alcoholic, weed makes you Dank and being homosexual makes your anus into goatse. If some organization tries to deny these facts, they will become like homosexuals. Inventing lies about causes and prevalence of homosexuality.There are no gays, bisexuals or similar people in my friends. I don't even suspect that someone might be such in hiding.It is one of the unattractive things in lesbians, but not most ugly one.Being gay is the most shameful and offensive thing to be. It really does not matter how it is called. In almost every part of former ussr gays are called pidors. It came from shortened russian word meaning "pederast", that came from medical term in latin.I really don't understand that. Dressing like freaks and marching on streets. If I'm happy together with my girlfriend, should we both run half-naked on streets wearing makeup like circus clowns?Brazil carnival? I seen that. Gay pride is not similar to that.It seems like you might be one of them!It's not big deal to grab girl by tits or hug her. As long as she does not run screaming away. It is natural.It is myth that people who don't like homosexuals were molested as a child or are homosexuals in hiding.You forgot to add homosexuals to that list. They want to control how society thinks about them and punish people who don't agree with them.I think it is wrong to have someone killed for wrong reasons, but it is OK to kill someone for right reasons. Like in war. I'm not talking about killing other human to eat but about taking enemies life to win.Eating flesh of the same species are rare occurrence in mammals and are potentially dangerous. Just like homosexuality.Good luck protesting only against his stinky skeletons in closet! If the necrophiliac is protected like homosexuals are, the protesting against his dumping of ex-lovers will be classified as "necrophobia" and You declared as a intolerant and fined for hate speech or worse.I's not You who offended me, the whole legitimizing of homosexuality did it. Less than 20 years ago that were one of most shameful thing to do and even was punished by law. Now the same behavior are officially the same as my relationships with my girlfriend. 180 degree turn caused by pressure from european union and political infiltration of parliament by homos.

And You are right. I have not a right not to be offended like homosexuals have. The only right I have are rights I'm ready to fight for! And ready I am as hell!Too broad definition. I might care for well being of many people, but this does not mean I want to fuck them.Homosexuals want to redefine marriage also. And man-women partnership loses the exclusivity if there are also recognized other models of "family".

When an argument comes down to dissecting everything sentence by sentence you know someone is clearly being ignorant...

I'm only showing how wrong gay supporters are. You like to be around people who have totally different and wrong outlook on life? Fine. Your morals and common sense of right and wrong are gone. Sexuality is one of most basic aspects of humanity. Make the sexuality wrong and the result is no more considered a human.

Luckily, you don't have to, as it's happening (mind you, not in your capitol city...)
http://concord-nh.patch.com/topics/420+at+4%253A20+on+4%252F20

But you said "Love," not "sex" or even "fuck." Unfortunately for you, "sex" also cannot be defined as man and woman only, nor can "fuck." Tell me, when you have sex, is it strictly vaginal, missionary (man on top) sex, or do you sometimes only have enough to afford a blowjob?

I fail to see a problem with that. But, perhaps that is because I am not filled with (self?) hate.

The 'natural - unnatural' argument doesn't fly.  Homosexuality occurs in nature, and is therefor natural.  It may be uncommon, but it is no less natural than heterosexuality.  Eating animals is natural.  Animals eating the same animal as they are is natural.  Animals having sex with their brothers, sisters and cousins is natural.

Why, then, do people experience these very same traits?  This argument ends when you come to the following conclusion:

Are people natural?
[ ] Yes
[ ] No

If people are natural, then the things they do are explained.  If people aren't natural, then the things they do are explained.  But there is no "what this person does is natural, and what that person does is unnatural."  We all come from nature, and we all act according to what nature says.  Nobody becomes a pedophile because they thought it was kinda cool.  Nobody has sex with the same gender because their "nature" was tainted by a bad childhood experience.  If humans are so complex that such things would alter the very workings of their mind, why is it that animals have the very same tendencies?  That would imply animals have minds equally as complex as ours, or that these unwanted tendencies aren't intentional and a part of a person's genetic makeup.

For example:  Why does John like the taste of cheesecake while Jim hates it?  They both have the same tongues, right?  So Jim must be pretending to hate it, or John must be pretending to like it.  Because most people like cheesecake, Jim must be a liar.  This is the logic behind the natural/unnatural correlation.  There is no homosexual by choice, only the homosexual as created.  To hate the homosexual is to hate women, or to hate blacks, or to hate pedophiles, or to hate tall people.  It may be hard to accept, but the facts are laid out plain as Jane.  People will be people, and nature doesn't give two damns about morals.  There is no right or wrong, these are abstractions, and must always be remembered that they cannot apply universally, for there is no absolute right, no absolute wrong, and no absolute fact, merely observations and interpretations.  So not only can I not find a reason why homosexuality is wrong, but there can never be a point that homosexuality is wrong.  It's impossible.  Likewise, homosexuality cannot be right.  It is what it is and that's about all you can ever logically figure; all other argument is spurred by emotion, and emotion leads to opinion, and opinion, as we all learned long ago, cannot be used as fire-power to back a fact.

Emotion! (https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/appeal-to-emotion)

I know that efforts to legalize weed are made worldwide and I think it is good thing. Weed are not more harmful than other legal substances. And legalizing weed will give less tools for governments and pigs to persecute people.

I also know that many times potheads exaggerate weeds medical properties or keep silent about the harms it can cause. Good thing is that they never took it to homosexual propagandist level. It would be wrong for european union to force wed legalization upon us. Sovereignty both for individuals and national states!

And better joint in mouth than cock in asshole. Ganja sure are more natural for humans than homosexuality.There is no distinct words for sexual love or other love but they are different things. I'm talking about sexual love.Various positions we can come up, sometimes oral, anal sex. But only with right gender. The fact that I disprove other forms of pseudo-sexual behavior like homosexualism, sadomasochism or zoophilia does not mean I don't have normal sex life when I'm together with girl I love.You fail to see problem in that some people don't want to have normal families and normal lifes? Love with women are one of most important things in life and family are purpose of life. If someone not only does not want to have that but chooses to act different, he is strange at least...

"Sexual love" is not a thing. There is love, and there is sex. Sometimes you have sex with someone you love. Sometimes you love someone but do not have sex with them. Sometimes you have sex with someone you do not love.

I see. so, you would have no problem with a woman ramming a strap-on into your ass, just not a guy using the real thing, is that t?

What's this "normal" you keep talking about? Not everyone is like you. I suggest you get used to that.

I really hope you have a kid and he turns out to be gay. What would you do? You could say you're nearly as bad as Mr Hitler himself... But seriously I have quite a few gay friends, and it doesn't make a difference to our relationship... Its not like gay people come up and wave their nobs in your face. I think if you knew some homosexuals, you would realise the majority just want go get on with their lives in a happy way and don't display their sexuality for all to see. You obviously get extremists, ones which really put themselves out there... But you also get in yo face religious people or racists... They are generally the minority. But again you don't know any gay people so you are just relying on what you have heard so your opinion is pretty crappy.
You keep saying the word 'normal'... what is normal exactly? No one person is the same, no one is normal. If we were all normal we would be robots... Each human beings uniqueness is what makes our species so 'great.' I bet you think homosexuality is a disease lol.


I bet you'd LOVE that to happen you cheeky chappy! Alcohol, the closet homosexuals best friend.

you don't understand what im saying! i do not want to hurt you. im just saying, by using your own faulty logic, it would be perfectly acceptable, because we have different opinions.


so you don't know any, and still you think you are qualified to say something about all of them.

so all girl should have long hair. should they stay in the kitchen too?

it does not come from latin, it comes from greek. and it means: "older man having a homosexual relationship with a younger man", notice the age difference, that is where it differs from homosexuality.
you are uneducated, and irrationally angry.

it does not hurt me,

why? because i slept with a lesbian girl?

so if she is passed out, just rape her.

i assume you love your mother, do you want to fuck your mother?
as myrkul said: love and fuck, love and no fuck, no love and fuck. they are different things.

and so what? is there anything wrong about that?


and not just to make you throw up:
http://blindgossip.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/men-kissing-7.jpg

What.


What.


Double what.

and the worst thing: i don't think he is joking.

Normal sex are when man is sticking his dick into women, not other way around. Your thinking is flawed. It is like saying it would be OK for me to have scat play with women but big no with other man.Normal is what are norm in society. Like drinking water is normal but drinking gasoline are not. The same with having sex with proper gender being the norm.Thank You! I hope Your kid will be moron and will have AIDS. What I will do if my children turn out to be homosexual? I will kick them out for good. Homosexuality is choice, it is unnatural to be attracted to your on gender and it is choice to act upon these urges. If my kid decides to be homosexual after all the society and family teaches him about proper way of life, he will be lost to me.I think Hitler was greatest man of 20-th century. Taking care of homosexuals was only part of his work for better world. Too bad he lost the war.The gay pride people definitely are extremists in such sense. In europe the same people travel from pride to pride and there are like about 10 local gay people from 2+ million country showing up, not including political supporters with agenda.I'm atheistic racist and I'm not the minority. Majority of people generally support my ideas but they simply are too afraid to stand for what they believe. It is legacy from stalinist era and russian occupation.Do serial killers are normal? I need binary answer Yes/No. Homosexuals are not normal because they do it wrong and wont admit it. They want everyone else to accept their wrong way of having sex and relationships.I understand. It would be perfectly acceptable to fight for what we each stand for. I will beat crap out of every gay supporter and I welcome them to try to do the same to me. No homo have accepted the challenge in last 8 years.I also don't know any serial killers, but this does not prevent me for having opinion about them. I sure don't want serial killers as accepted part of society.Girls with long hair are more beautiful and womanly. Yes, they preferably stay in kitchen and watch children while men are working. Not quite possible right now because of wrong way the society and economics are made, but this is how it must be. Look at different societies with different family models. Europe are dieing, working women don't have much time to care for kids.No, pederasty is man having anal contact with another man.No, I'm not brainwashed by liberal education system and western media. I know many people who have degree in science or history and who are just as anti-homosexual as me.Because You are in the same company with them. It is like being in the same gang as bank robbers. You are one of them or will become.Is there anything wrong to redefine meaning of God? Or change borders of Fatherland? Or change rules of Bitcoin? World will not stop spinning if any of that happens, but it would become a shitty place to live. It certainly is not OK for me.I wanted to add Goatse here to show the gross nature of homosexuality but I probably have already done this couple of times here. And these man in the pic are not real gays. Too masculine. Chris Cooker is one example of real gayfag.

I have a feeling that I'm trying to prove something to people who think they can divide with zero! Division with zero is not possible, it is wrong! Like homosexuality or zoophilia. Sure in past the division with zero was accepted as valid operation in some societies, just as homosexuality was. And probably squirrels also sometimes divide by zero.

I see, so you would never practice cunnilingus? As for the scat play, nothing in your previous posts indicated that you would be against it, so long as it was with a woman.

Gasoline is poisonous. Drinking it will kill you. Nobody has ever died simply from being gay. What would you do if being gay were the norm, and your heterosexuality were seen the same way you see their homosexuality?

Serial killers are not normal because they harm people. Homosexuals are perfectly normal people who have different sexual tastes than you do.

You know, for a guy who supposedly hates gays, you spend an awful lot of time staring at a gaped asshole. As for the gentlemen in the picture, I can attest, as someone who lived in the 3rd gayest city in the US, that those men are typical of American homosexuals. Not all of them wear makeup, you know.

Not true. AIDS was initially spread by homosexuals and shooting junkies. Homosexuality have various risk factors that normal couples don't have.Then human species would not exist. Very few species of animals show homosexual behavior because only few species had not encountered natural selection against it.No, homosexuals harm entire society by playing by different rules. Think about cancer nodes in Bitcoin network. The network must ban the minority of misbehaving nodes or entire network will succumb to these new gay rules. The same with homosexuals in society.

Fun Fact: fastest rising HIV-positive population: Heterosexual women. It's an anatomy thing. And AIDS doesn't just kill homosexuals. Drinking gasoline only kills the person who drinks it, and pretty much does the job every time.

Another fun fact: the human race no longer needs males (or hetero sex) to reproduce. There's more than enough stored sperm in the world's sperm banks to keep the population going indefinitely, and, of course, gay men can provide samples with just the same ease as straight ones can.

I have yet to see one societal harm done by homosexuals. In fact, in my experience, they've been a great benefit to any community which they moved into. Two incomes, no kids, means a lot of expendable resources. Not only are they a boon to the economy, but they frequently renovate businesses, homes, sometimes entire neighborhoods. They're anything but a "harm" to society.

Wait, let me get this straight. You're afraid that if gays are accepted, they'll turn everyone gay? Or is it just you you're afraid they'll turn? I don't know about you, but I'm not in fear of being turned gay, and as I said, I've lived in the 3rd gayest city in the US. I've know a LOT of gays over the years. Never been tempted to take a ride on the disco stick. I'm secure in my masculinity, and my heterosexuality.

It is true now. 15 to 20 years ago AIDS were almost exclusive to homosexuals, junkies and prisoners. Monogamic couples were largely safe.And living in a world where kids are not result of parents love? It is probably worse than Orwellian society. You demonstrate how fucked up worldview and values homosexuals have.No, it is completely false. Homosexuals cannot put brick on brick to renovate something, straight man are builders. Homosexuals usually work as barbers or stylists and such professions. And traditional families are the most beneficial to society. Fags without kids means less people in future, meaning declining workforce for nation. Not economically beneficial at all.Learn to read and understand what I'm telling. I'm not afraid about me turning gay, it cannot happen. I'm afraid that if homosexuality will become accepted as normal, other perversions and deviations will become too. Zoophilia, necrophilia, sadomasochism, baby fucking, cannibalism. And the dissolution of traditional family is real possibility as a result. When kids are made from frozen sperm and raised in fag communities. And this will be only the beginning.

I've tried to follow this disussion here: MysteryMiner contra The Board, and I see that The Board is completely missing the social context.

MysteryMiner is a Latevian neofascist. If you aren't aware of the neo-nazism in the ex-USSR you'll need to gain the understanding of the social context.

There is a documentary entitled "The Pack of White Wolves" which is a Greek/English movie about neo-nazism in Russia, primarily about Slavic Union (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavic_Union). The initials of this organization in Russian are "CC" which is the same as the German abbreviation "SS" for Schutzstaffel. The movie was made in 2011 and should be easy to find on the web, and the subtitles and transcripts are available for several languages.

Please note that MysteryMiner is Latevian, so for him Slavic Union is both an ally and an enemy. An ally because as a Latevian he is of Slavic heritage like Russians. An enemy because  Latevia was occupied by the Soviet Union and the native Latevians were subject to forced russification.

Also please note that "The Pack of White Wolves" is made by the anti-fascists, therefore the pro-nazi characters are crudely drawn.

If you want to get a better emotional understanding of the neo-nazism in the ex-USSR I can recommend two science-fiction movies that contain deeper portayal of the pro-nazis. The movies are completely fictious, they are in the action/adventure/sci-fi/fantasy genre, but all the characters are well-drawn and very grounded in the reality of the contemporary Commonwealth of Independent States.

Those movies are "My iz budushchego" and "My iz budushchego 2". They were distributed under various titles like "Paradox Soldiers", "We Are from the Future", "Amongst Heroes", etc.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1192431/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1590125/

Edit: I made a mistake. MysteryMiner is Latevian, not Lithuanian. I'm correcting this message.

You have no idea how stupid you sound. Even if "Homosexuals cannot put brick on brick to renovate something" were true (it's not), they can still pay people to do so for them. And usually, the worry is overpopulation, not underpopulation.

Well, let's read what you said, shall we?
Sure sounds like you're afeared of turning gay. Like most homophobes. They're afraid of those dark desires deep within them.

So the Eastern European bigot is saying he wished Hitler would have won, I'm guessing thinking he would have had a place in the new Aryan world order.

This thread is awesome.

1. I'm not Lithuanian and don't live in Lithuania.
2. I'm not neofascist. I'm traditional national-socialist. There are a lot of differences.
3. Lithuanians haven't Slavic ancestry. Lithuanians together with Latvians are last two living Baltic nations with unique history.
4. Movie made by anti-fascists about fascists are just as objective as movie about americans made by North Koreans. I suspect it is not worth watching as it very likely contains more falsified information than PirateAt40 advertisements.
5. Slavic Union are white power neonazi group that are hostile to sovereignty of nations in former USSR. I have been in contact with them, I know their attitude.

Nazism is nothing to do with being anti-homosexual. It is like saying all Bitcoin supporters are Libertarians. It is stereotype. Very few people are openly nazistic. Majority don't call them nazis or even don't support many policies of nazism. But they still have the same opinion on homosexuality.

So the people who say that division with zero are impossible all are mathematicians?Overpopulation might be a problem if You live in Africa. The shrinking population is catastrophic in many parts of Europe.I have not any homosexual desires. I'm talking about extremely small minority who fuck in different ways forcing the majority of society to accept them as valid way of life. I'm not talking of everyone turning into a fag. Can You see the difference?I would have place there, yes! My nation in 1941 was saved from deportations and genocide by advancing German army. Hitler's army. Also Germany had best economy and fairest organization of society than any other nation participating in WW2. Facts speak for themselves.

They're not forcing anything. If anyone is using force here, it's you.

Laws protecting homosexuals from rightful discrimination and riot police protecting gay pride are not force? Homosexuals are manipulating society just to get accepted. It is either some conspiracy or just unrealized self-importance to be accepted. Either way they first started to disturb order. Before them kikes and russians were the problem, now they are joined by perverts.

Defensive force is another matter entirely. And here I am going to side with you - a bit. Discrimination (freedom of association means freedom not to associate) is fine. It's when you start throwing bricks at their parades that you cross the line. Initiating force is a no-no.

I apologise for my mistakes.

I've mixed up Lithuania with Latvia. I've corrected my previous message in this thread. To make such a mistake for me is completely unexcusable, I'm well aware of the .lt versus .lv distinction and the distinctive history of both nations.

Equally bad on my part is mixing up Slavs with Balts.

I regret making those mistakes.

What I reconfirm is the information about the cooperation and mutual support of the national-socialistic, neo-fascist, old-falangist and similar totalitarian and human-purity movements in Europe. Unfortunately this phenomenon is so recent that there is very little publicly-available information about this in English. Whatever is available in English tends to use code-words, like 88 for "Heil Hitler".

Edit: It is equally hard to come by a reliable and representative information about the social situation in the Baltic independent states that were former republics of the USSR. But please don't try to make direct comparisons between the LGBT rights in the USA and the LGBT rights in the former Soviet Bloc. You will completely miss the point both in the historical and current social context.

Facts:

Balts were slavicized ages ago. Check the damn language. Duh.
Your nation was pwned for thousands of years. Fact.
During WW2 the idiots thought that killing poles and jews was good for business. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponary_massacre
Now, they're just nothing. Who would remember a lithuanian or a latvian today?

Too bad soviets didnt ship them to Siberia like Chechens.

do you consider yourself a minority?

Relatively certain he views himself - mistakenly - among the majority.

He may be a hetero Caucasian male, but his view plant him squarely in the minority.

First gay pride was not met with actively violent protestors. Protestors were peacefully sitting in front of church to block gayfags from entering church and spoiling it. Protesters, including women were forcefully removed by riot police. Next and subsequent years gays were met with much more stronger opposition...Don't worry, it is easy to mix up similar countries with obscure history.These are false facts invented by NKVD officers under Stalin and Beria.

Balts are not slavicized even now. Baltic language group are distinct group. Completely distinct language group than neighboring Slavic language group.

Latvians kicked out both Germans and Russians from Latvia in WW1. Further read here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latvian_War_of_Independence

During WW2 in year 1940 we were occupied by Soviet Union. About 35 000 were murdered or forcibly relocated by jewish NKVD officers for behalf of russian colonists. It all ended in 1941 when German army forced Russian army to retreat. Some people who's relatives were murdered or taken away by soviets were quick to volunteer into police brigades. But they were not participating in repressions against jews mainly because german "special units" did not trust latvians with this task. Additional reading: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_occupation_of_Latvia_in_1940

We still are something. Time and our actions will prove it!

And You are russian imperialist who want to kill every neighboring nation just to expand the russian land. And You are butthurt about the fact that they are fighting back - Latvians, Finns, Chechens, even slavic Ukrainians. Every neighboring nation hate Russians.You are wrong Myrkul. You probably will not believe but my views are not in minority.

LOL. Stalin and Beria wrote the wikipedia. OMG this is so funny.


Fact: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Balto-Slavic_language

The simple story of Balts. West Balts got pwned by Germanic tribes, East Balts got pwned by Slavs.. The remnants got kicked all the way to the north and a bunch of them just simply got assimilated.


After centuries getting owned? And how long they lasted. O'way. Jews did a much better job with Israel.

Fact:

Reds pwned Latvians, only after help from Germany AND Poland they got their short lived independence.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Latvia



So you're a latvian?

I assume these guys aren't Latvians? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust_in_Latvia#Ar.C4.81js_commando_formed

Jewish NKVD? Ahhhh..





Huh? Finns / Ukrainians are fine with Russians. Only small dicks like you bitch a lot.

Why would they want to enter a church? Was the priest/minister/whatever of this church among the crowd preventing their entry? Do you have a news report or other article regarding this event? (Russian is fine, Google does a half-way decent job with the translation)

I have to say I don't approve of use of riot police to remove a counterprotest.

You guys certainly have some difficulty getting that whole "peaceably assemble" bit down.
You're right, I don't believe you. Yours is a dwindling voice.

What?

People are open minded enough to use this revolutionary internet currency but do have issues if some people around them don't follow the 2000 years old Biblical view of "proper" human relationships.

Maybe all of the scared people just are too scared of their own bi- or homosexual thoughts. This is just insane, I couldn't care less if there are some gay couples walking in the streets, it's none of my business.

...while claiming they are atheist.

I have unedited VHS video tape from that event. Police using force against non-violent and passive protesters, including older women and teenagers. Jut for the "gay" people to enter church as an act of blasphemy. I'm not christian but I understand that the only reason for church service that day was to provocate and infuriate christians.

And what about "peacefull assembly" of necrophiliacs? (their assembly really must be quiet and peaceful ;) )Different parts of world have different moral and cultural values. Different laws. Good luck forcing decriminalization of alcohol consumption upon Saudi arabian muslims!If homosexuality was "proper" then every people would fuck everyone else. More than 90% prefer opposite sex as sexual partners.

I stopped to believe the concept of god in the same day I learned that Santa Claus and Easter bunny are fake. My parents were atheistic as well. Opposing homosexuality and other deviations is nothing to do with religion at all. I have no religion, don't believe there is anything supernatural in world etc. It just happens so than in USA largest anti-gay protesters are christians. Here christians are protesting too, but main body of protesters are ordinary people.It is not true. The homosexual controlled press and television make people believe this bullcrap about protesters being hidden gay themselves. I liked naked women from age 9 when I started to masturbate. Of course I cannot prove that I have no desires or thoughts of having homosexual affairs.

It is my business if I find something disgusting and unpleasant happening in public. If I'm in cinema with my girlfriend I would not like to see a gay or lesbian couple around. It is like someone eating dog shit instead of popcorn. In both gay and dog shit cases I will kick the sicko out of there.

You failed to answer one vital question: Where was the pastor/priest/etc during all this? What was the church's opinion on the matter? And that VHS tape does me no good. I need something I can look at, not something you can look at and tell me about. Forgive me, but your objectivity is suspect.

Assuming they're not harming anyone, I have no problem with them.

The pastor was gay himself. Google for Maris Sants. He is the pidar pastor that got his ass kicked out from christian community. It was long ago and back then I was using VHS system for video. Probably goggling for Riga pride 2005 will bring up some videos from that event.Then all your common sense are totally gone. Not to mention moral values. You perfectly demonstrated this. I got impression that You are capable of thinking different than mainstream media and also a gun enthusiast. It is untypical for such person to be fag supporter.

Can I move this thread to Politics & Society now? I don't think the past few pages had anything to do with the forum itself...

Well, there you are then. His church, he can decide who to give a service for. If a little old lady was blocking the entrance to my place of business, she'd get moved out of the way, too. I probably wouldn't use riot police, but like I said, you guys don't quite have the whole "peaceful protest" thing down yet.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarianism

Perfectly typical.

I'm fine with that.

The homosexuals were trying every possibility to intentionally infuriate society. They were expecting violent reaction to advance their political goals. There were no real violence against homosexuals before the gay prides. But they wanted to have public demonstrations, official recognition by state, gay marriage and adoption rights. It is all about what values and order society have, not what each pervert does in his bedroom.

The church was not owned by pastor. His actions caused him to be expelled from christian community. It is like cashier or security guard letting in robbers and convicts into bank vault and do banking operations in there.

More like the bank manager letting convicts have bank accounts. He was put in charge of the church. That gave him the ability to choose who to do services for.

I'm sorry if your fine "atheist" ::) sensibilities were offended by a pastor giving a service for whomever he felt like, but it's not yours, or the crowd's, decision, it's his. If that got him booted from the church hierarchy, well, then that's the risk he took.

Here in the US, we have churches specifically set up for gays, by gays. And I have no problem with that, nor with gays attending normal church services.

i am i minority, and therefor i sympetise with other minorities. No im not gay, i have a mental disorder called autism. "Weird" people(like me, or homos, or blacks, or jews) were killed in Germany when the Nazis ruled.

Now a short poem in danish by Martin Niemöller from WW2:
and translation to english:

This is why we disagree with you: You are attacking a minority. And we ask the question: "will i be next?"

No sane and intelligent person, would support a system that discriminates minorities, except in self defense(bankrobbers or murders).

Therefor i conclude that you are either very stupid, or insane. Discussion over.

He's already established that he's a Nazi. So very probably both.

I know. But what really pissed me off, is that he does not respond to logic.

Church are anti-gay by definition. Most of the gays attending church were not believers like majority of people living in ex-ussr. They visited church with single purpose - provocation. I don't care about church. All that I want is fags being removed from society and I don't like that they get their goals.People with autism are vegetables. Aspergers are over-diagnosed in recent time. People with autism usually have no empathy towards others, so You probably are not sick with autism. Nazis did good job by destroying the incurable sick. The mentally retarded will not only never be cured but also the mental retardation is abomination of human. I have seen really retarded people peeing on walls, salivating and having seizures. If you think that junkies or homeless are disgusting then think again.No. By creating unified nation I would not be next. I'm normal individual with proper skin color, ethnicity and political views.Was German people stupid and insane to vote Hitler as a canceler? And to fight for his ideas to death? I don't think so! This is like me saying that all libertarians or democrats are retarded.

Thanks for calling me a carrot. Asshole!
yes, i do have problems with empathy(and otherthings too). and, no im not sick.
Even though i have a problem with empathy, that does not mean that i don't know who to function in a society. All i have to do is behave in my own self interest, which means i should me nice to people, so that they will be nice to me too.
Empathy is the ability to recognize and feel others emotions.

LOL no, you are delusional and should be put in a institution.
and yes that is a valid aggression on a individual, who rape girls and attack other people. rapists and violent people are harmful for society, and should be put away.

No, they were not. They thought they were behaving in there own self interest, when Hitler came to power germany was poor, becuase they had lost WW1, and the Americans pulled out all their investments in Germany because of the wallstreet crack in '29.
Hitler blamed "the evil and rich" jews, and gave them Highways. and then brainwashed/group pressured the German people into nazism.
I can understand that they were confused.

Yup. God loves everyone. Except gays. ::)

Yes.

Oh, and before you start crowing that all crazy people should be exterminated, maybe you should consider that that might include you....
http://open.salon.com/blog/anthony_j_palik/2011/01/08/does_being_a_nazi_make_one_mentally_ill

You are not carrot, You are tomato! And I don't think that any real retards must be viewed as a minority. Many of them are not even self-aware and have nothing human left in them. They are incurable and burden to society and everyone who comes in contact with them. Contrary if You are capable of visiting this forum and are smart enough to use computer, You are not crazy. If You have other difficulties in life, it is either because all people have them or You are bad person.I never raped girl. On one occasion I released my hold on girl's leg so she can run away. I like them too much to hurt them in any way.

And what is considered violent people who must be put away? Are policeman violent? Are soldiers violent? Are person in self-defence violent? They do what they think is good. War of Independence was won by violence. I consider myself to be a resistance fighter. Fighting for things I'm ready to die for. And also ready to make enemy die for it!Hitler was absolutely right about jews influence. He was so right that in few years Germany regained economic strength to fight war for 6 years. German people were not stupid. Hitler's politics was example in many countries abroad, including Britain.Christian god does not love anything. By definition everyone will go to hell unless they are complete slaves of god. Only in bible there is black on white written that homosexuals must die with blood spilled. But I don't care about what is written in bible. Even if there wiould be written "be gayfag for your lord, assfuck or go to hell" I still would not accept homosexuality. Bible is made by old jews and redacted many times over centuries. It is nothing to do with divinity.

Dear OP,

Prejudice against those who are gay (regardless of gender) is EXACTLY the same as racism, religious genocide and is truly disgusting and abhorrent behaviour.

You who would bring back mutilation and human beings as 'property' disgusts me.

One day karma will work it's way around to you and you'll be treated as 'property', beaten, possibly mutilated, and definitely humiliated to the point where you feel utterly worthless. Because your religious belief is different than the person who is torturing you.

P.s. I'm not gay, I just think that you are an abhorrent 'thing' and I look forward to the day that you're treated the way you want to treat others :)

Btw - I'm going to guess that the OP lives in the US. Here's some facts, 'gay' people in the US (before the Europeans came over and destroyed everything) were actually revered much more than 'straight' people, and these 'gay' (was another term used back then) people were teachers, healers, carers, wise people, etc.

Op,

Just read your comment in one of your follow-up posts. WTF .. You seriously need to go lock yourself up in a mental institute and get help, I advise this for your own safety, cause with your views you're probably going to get mutilated or killed in a very painful way.

You've got screws loose in your head, go fix it, I suggest a swan dive in a brick yard, that should work ;)

I'm also a racist. So what? I have no religious beliefs. I'm atheist. Karma does not exist. I know numerous examples of good people having shitty life until they die and bad people living good and prosperous life because they are bad. It all comes down to how smart or lucky you are.

And racism is nothing bad at all. It is caring for your own people for better future.

You're a complete *bleep* really aren't you :D Throw that racism shit in certain parts of the UK and you'll get beaten to an inch of your life.

Chopping off peoples body parts because you 'own' them and you're a racist segregationist piece of sh*t isn't gonna end well for you ;)

And karma doesn't give a care whether you believe in it or not.

Racism is NOTHING about 'caring about your own people'. You just continue to highlight not only how disgusting you are, but also how stupid you are, which easily highlights how retarded anti-gay people are. I'm sure the nazi community is thanking you greatly for showing us how a anti-gay, racist, rapist, is presenting himself.

Research shows that actually, people like YOU are the true 'closet gay', too scared by your upbringing to admit it to yourself that YOU Sir, are totally gay. And by reaction you throw hate and violence at it (truly throwing it at yourself).

Your views of raping women also re-enforces the pyschological studies that prove YOU are totally gay and would take it up the backside quicker than I could blink if you really knew no one would find out. Because you are way over compensating with trying to portray that you would 'rape a woman' (or at least don't consider it 'bad') whilst at the same time attacking the gay community.

I imagine that if people here decided to start sending you PM's with gay people having sex you'd secretly be spanking off all day and night :D

P.s. about the 'Karma' thing, witness how your life goes in the next 3 months.

the reason the jews had the banking industrial, was because they was not allowed to own land in a christian country, and their own contry isreal had been taking from them along time ago. thereby forcing them to do the banking for the christians.

so hitler was actually attacking the jews, because they had been semi-forced into the banking industry for a few centuries.

know your history dude, you are fucked up

im not at all taking about karma. im talking about mutual benefits through voluntary social transactions(tit-for-tat).

There are religious scholars that would disagree with you, here. You're not worth the effort to argue the point, though.


Hey genius: Your "own people" are Homo Sapiens Sapiens, ie Humans. There is only one Race. What you're whining about is ethnicity, minor differences in skin coloration or facial features. Might as well discriminate based on eye color. ::)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master_race


But clearly jewish are more superior... Let's check how many Nobel prizes they got o.O

20% of all prizes, while there are only 0.2% of the population...

I always thought "gay bashing" was kinda gay. I could care less about what consenting adults want to do in the bedroom. But gay bashers can't seem to stop thinking about it.

 :-X

I would argue socioeconomic factors play a larger part than straight genetics.

He does love posting that goatse image....

Any normal white straight male christians here?

Not christian, and probably not what some would call normal, But I am straight, white, and male.

This is what happened to Britain when they allowed immigrants. Tolerance poisons and kills nation.You are hallucination. I'm not chopping off body parts lolFake research does not count anything. It all are political propaganda to smear anti-gay protesters. If You like homosexuals, you are gay. If You don't like homosexuals, you are gay. Complete bullshit.I never told that raping women is good. I told that women raping is more natural than being gayfag. Learn to read!I'm confident it will be much better than it is now!Jews are in banking industry because they want to control world and banks gives them power. Also the banks are operating a scam schemes. It perfectly fits into jew nature. The christians being forbidden to banking might be true in middle ages but not in 1930's Germany.I don't need any benefits from jews, negroes or gayfags and they will not receive any from me. Ever! My society are my people. In national strength I trust!White and black are no slightly different skin colors. They are opposite side. My ancestors were white people, living, enduring hardships and fighting for this land for millennium! I feel united with my nation and it's past. In same time negroes were eating bananas and fucking in savannas and bushes of Africa. They are totally alien.Learn to read. It is not about secret actions in bedroom. They take their "otherness" publicly into streets and mass media and this is where gayfags crossed all lines.I also love posting Pain series https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Pain_series and images from Offended section https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Offended to websites for shock value. Does this hint me being gay?

Great glad to see there are more people like me here.

First off, Unless you're an albino (and therefore a genetic mutation which, by your philosophy, should be purged), you're not white. Your skin color can, at most, be described as "light tan" This is produced as the result of low levels of melanin in your skin. Your ancestors developed this light coloration as a result of lower solar radiation levels in the northern regions where they lived, and due to colder temperatures requiring you to cover your body, thus blocking solar radiation. This resulted in a lack of Vitamin D (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitamin_D) production, and those with lighter skin were better able to produce it. Thus, the lighter skin color evolved in response to the different conditions your ancestors experienced after leaving Africa.

The Africans, by contrast, stayed in the sun, and heat, and thus required no mutation to allow additional solar radiation to pass. Their melanocytes produce as much as the original strain that left Africa and became your ancestors. If you want to talk about racial purity, I suggest you look at Africa for an example of a "pure" human.

Secondly, since the various ethnicities can interbreed, they are by definition not "totally alien." Merely offshoots of the same species - which originated in Africa.

It is one of the hypothesis You described. I'm OK if it turns out to be truth. But strangely this is also the politically correct version. We still don't know over how long time period the skin color and facial features changed. It also is possible that various human races lived in prehistoric europe and asia before. It is still mystery because of rarity of human remains and the political consequences the discoveries might bring.

This still does not mean that black people must be allowed in europe or white people are welcome to colonize Africa. Every nation and race have their own place.

I'm christian, and hetrosexual ('straight' as you put it), and I'm male! But I'm classed as 'black' (I'm actually 'tanned' tone, and consider myself 'dark' when asked). So I guess I'm not like you? And I must go back to my own planet?

Ohh.. wait..

I'm afraid Science beats you, there, too: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrial_Eve

Uh huh. Until one needs some more "lebensraum," right? Here's a crazy idea: Let people live wherever the hell they want.

No I don't know why I said I mentioned skin color. Being hetero and christian are the most important thing.

"There's no place for the state in the bedrooms of the nation".
-Pierre Elliott Trudeau

I hate how those anti-gay zealot are always trying to push the government into everything. Don't you have any notion of freedom? Are you so insecure that you need the government to manage how people fuck together?

I really don't understand Americans. They want guns to protect themselves against the government, but they need the state to tell them how to use their dick.  ::)

This is the most insane thread I have read in years. :o

While I am very impressed that he is honest enough to share his opinions on the world, it is a shame he doesn't have the intelligence to realise how stupid his opinions really are.

I am proud of being white and northern European with a gene history going back almost 1600 years.  However, I am perfectly happy that a black person is just as right to be proud of their colour and genetic history.

Where it all falls apart is when someone thinks they are superior to another because of a colour - especially when it comes from a person from a nation of inbred goat herders who are known for marrying their sisters!
(ok, so I made up the last bit, but bet I could find more people who agree with me, than who agree with the OP's views!)

Anyway - there is very little point in carrying on with this thread - except for entertainment purposes! ;)

Thankfully, Him, I don't have to be embarrassed for. He's from one of those little Baltic countries that got raped by annexed into the Soviet union, and then left out to dry when it broke up.

its actually the gays pushing their agenda on non-gays.

Yeah, that whole "we're people too" thing was bad enough when the women and then the blacks did it...  ::)

There is a proverb that say that the worse enemy of a woman is another woman. I think it's the same for gay people.

Burn on OP, apply cold water!

completely different. woman and black people can't control if they're born wit out a dick or if their skin is black

They also can't control whether or not they like dick.  Do you like sushi?  Some people don't like sushi.  However, all people are born with the same tongues, so why is it that Bill likes sushi but Jane hates sushi?  OBVIOUSLY Jane is a fucking liar, because if Bill likes sushi, and Jane's got the same tongue Bill was born with, she's just pretending to dislike sushi for attention.

Well said. But a well-cared-for dick tastes no better - or worse - than your arm. So you might amend that to "They also can't control whether or not they like the taste of dick"

Good call ;D  Fixed it

Mysteryminer, there's something called tolerance. Learn to tolerate shit, going out of your way to belittle someone is hateful. Tolerating something doesn't mean you have to like it, it just means that you don't go out of your way to be hatin'.

http://www.southparkstudios.com/full-episodes/s06e14-the-death-camp-of-tolerance

Here you go, southpark can teach you more ethical behavior then life can.

I believe it was Franklin and/or Paine who came up with the "EAT SHIT OR DIE" illustration.

taste for sushi isn't biologically important and backed by billions of years of evolution  :-X

On the contrary, food tastes are closely linked to evolution. For most of our development, food was scarce. Therefore, high-calorie, high fat foods, those that gave us the vitally necessary energy to keep living, taste good. If we have a deficiency of a particular vitamin or mineral, we develop a craving for a food that contains it.

oh i change my stance then.

So the Eastern European bigot is saying he wished Hitler would have won, I'm guessing thinking he would have had a place in the new Aryan world order.

This thread is awesome.