Bitcoin Forum

Economy => Reputation => Topic started by: lakisis on September 15, 2016, 03:44:09 AM



Title: [Open] Against BIT.AC Signature Campaign is Scam coz they Rejected 95% member .
Post by: lakisis on September 15, 2016, 03:44:09 AM
[


 

 


Campaign Manager are just enrolling his own alt account its proof and you can see the Campaign Manager Rejected 95% Member





CAMPAIGN OWNER: bitac.......
CAMPAIGN MANAGER: SFR10. Just Enrolled his own bitcointalk multiple account in this campaign and because spot is still empty and its too wonderful SFR10 wrote Reserve in the Spread sheet.
CAMPAIGN Manager : SFR10 do not want to give this opportunity to participate other Member
 





CAMPAIGN SPOTS

Legendary Members: (5 Spots)

Hero Members: (2 Spots)

Sr. Members:  (2 Spots)

Full Member:  (0 Spot)

Member:  (1 Spot)

25 users would be on this campaign



LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1e3hYWiCic0UB0GYOQnc5P1y9Tc96tkYObeWobB8LPaM/edit?usp=sharing



Title: Re: [Open] Against BIT.AC Signature Campaign is Scam coz they Reject 95% member .
Post by: isen on September 15, 2016, 04:02:26 AM
http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/facebook/000/555/778/b34.jpg


Title: Re: [Open] Against BIT.AC Signature Campaign is Scam coz they Reject 95% member .
Post by: yahoo62278 on September 15, 2016, 04:04:01 AM
Hey man, i realize your pissed off cause you have been rejected by yet another campaign but theres a reason youre being rejected. We dont just reject accounts because we want novels written, we want our alts in(my only alt is sellsrmember btw), or because we dont like you(rapidly approaching that point for you). Accounts are rejected for many various reasons.

1. gappy post history- Gappy post history means you made a few posts 1 day, then 3 weeks earlier you made a post, then 12 days earlier made a few more. Makes 20 posts in a day all within a few minutes of each other. Pattern similar to this.

2. spammer- posting total nonsense with account. +1,bump, off topic replies, 1 liner trash that really looks like no effort was put into the post.

3. Negative trust- self explanatory

4. Known alt of another account in the campaign

5. Abusive member- although ive never rejected anyone for this reason and i dont think anyone else would say so publicly, you personally would gain this title from me.

6. No open spots for your rank



Theres many different reason we reject ppl as you see, and im sure theres more reasons to post im just tired and not thinking clearly right now. Once we reject users we get multiple types of replies. Please give a chance sir ill do better is one of my most popular responses to a rejection.

You were given a chance when you created you bitcointalk account. Why should we think that youre gonna do a better job if we allow you in a campaign? I personally have allowed a few shit posters in campaigns if its a very large campaign. On the smaller ones im very selective.

Regardless of why you or anyone else is denied you shouldnt take offense to it. You should work on your account and try to make it a better account. When we hire you to wear sigs youre representing a company. If you want to be an employee of that company then act like it. Your account should be active a few days a week at least. You should think about your responses to a post. Read the thread youre thinking about posting in and make sure your answer isnt gonna be something that has already been said(alot of users dont read threads). Then make your reply. Noone is asking for novels we just want longer than 5-10 words and an on topic response when we look through your history.

Making threads like these will only get you put on managers ignore lists


Title: Re: [Open] Against BIT.AC Signature Campaign is Scam coz they Reject 95% member .
Post by: Avirunes on September 15, 2016, 04:08:17 AM
Every campaign checks different things in an applicant. Some of them only want promotion and some of them want promotion and quality posts. TBH I also got rejected by SFR10 for BlockPay Signature campaign but I feel nothing like butthurt at all. SFR10 does a great job in checking an applicant and so allows who is active and quality poster in the forum.

Also please explain me how rejection of 95% applicants relate to scam?  ;D
SFR10 stealed money did he? Or he tried?  ;D
Better roam around forum and try to understand how things out  here. So far butthurt all explains to me like a kid of 8-9 age crying for his  milk bottle  :P


Title: Re: [Open] Against BIT.AC Signature Campaign is Scam coz they Rejected 95% member .
Post by: LieXurui on September 15, 2016, 04:38:56 AM
last week or maybe two week
OP agry because application in rejected from manager signature yahoo
and now OP agry again because rejected manager signature campaign SF10

hello friend increase your atttitude
manager signature campaign high trusted


Title: Re: [Open] Against BIT.AC Signature Campaign is Scam coz they Rejected 95% member .
Post by: LifeLine on September 15, 2016, 04:58:24 AM
There is Many Foolish and Nonsense Campaign Manager Like as SFR10 and Yahoo etc and i will going to Announce My Project against Bad Managers and this Project will be too Effective and I am sure i will destroy the Career of these Manager through by that Project ,and i collecting some Proof about multiple account of Managers so wait i will soon announce the project in few weeks.


Title: Re: [Open] Against BIT.AC Signature Campaign is Scam coz they Rejected 95% member .
Post by: izanagi narukami on September 15, 2016, 05:03:26 AM

When campaign manager do right things, there're still some  member who against it
When campaign manager do nothing , there're still some member who against it

What should they do ?


Title: Re: [Open] Against BIT.AC Signature Campaign is Scam coz they Rejected 95% member .
Post by: james.lent on September 15, 2016, 05:09:46 AM
There is Many Foolish and Nonsense Campaign Manager Like as SFR10 and Yahoo etc and i will going to Announce My Project against Bad Managers and this Project will be too Effective and I am sure i will destroy the Career of these Manager through by that Project ,and i collecting some Proof about multiple account of Managers so wait i will soon announce the project in few weeks.

Should name it the Butt-hurt Project. Pretty sure that'll be the most suitable title for it.


Title: Re: [Open] Against BIT.AC Signature Campaign is Scam coz they Rejected 95% member .
Post by: mirakal on September 15, 2016, 05:36:13 AM
LOL, this is the funniest thread I have seen so far, the OP is making a campaign against SFR, damn why are you forcing your self to a campaign where you are not qualified, I would tell you there are other campaign that accepts your kind of post but you attitude is something that will make you won't last in a campaign.


Title: Re: [Open] Against BIT.AC Signature Campaign is Scam coz they Rejected 95% member .
Post by: lemipawa on September 15, 2016, 05:47:51 AM
SFR10 is one of the best campaign manager here, I say "one" bexause theres a lot of them here who are in chorus of cleaning the forum with spammers and farmers. I once worked with him and got kicked out because I was not able to meet the number of posts per week and he is polite in notifying me in his decision but instead of trowing tantrum's I accepted my short coming and move on. Your life does not depend on signature campaign. Be a man and not like kid that was not allowed to play with the other kids.


Title: Re: [Open] Against BIT.AC Signature Campaign is Scam coz they Rejected 95% member .
Post by: x4 on September 15, 2016, 05:58:23 AM

When campaign manager do right things, there're still some  member who against it
When campaign manager do nothing , there're still some member who against it

What should they do ?
Well this are kind of people who loves complaining, whether the campaign manager do the right thing  or the opposite one, they will still complain. I don't know what kind of manager is sfr10 because I've never enrolled and tried to enroll in the campaign he manages but all I know is he giving effort to choose the right user to join in any campaign he manage.


Title: Re: [Open] Against BIT.AC Signature Campaign is Scam coz they Rejected 95% member .
Post by: zend7 on September 15, 2016, 06:08:08 AM
SFR 10 has rejected all of my applications in the signature he is a manager of them and I didn't open a post like yours. When such thing happen move on to the next signature campaign. There are much better managers than him who are more open to contact and explain their participants what's happening. SFR 10 is not looking for story writers as most of people say here because I have seen people in safe dice signature he is running that don't know to write in proper English language.

If you really think you are a good poster and write quality content move on to the next campaign or try one with automatic enrollment if there's any spot left there.


Title: Re: [Open] Against BIT.AC Signature Campaign is Scam coz they Rejected 95% member .
Post by: Gahs on September 15, 2016, 06:14:42 AM

When campaign manager do right things, there're still some  member who against it
When campaign manager do nothing , there're still some member who against it

What should they do ?



Maybe they should disappear so no one will be against them ;D :D :D ;)


Title: Re: [Open] Against BIT.AC Signature Campaign is Scam coz they Rejected 95% member .
Post by: Omegasun on September 15, 2016, 06:14:48 AM
SFR 10 has rejected all of my applications in the signature he is a manager of them and I didn't open a post like yours. When such thing happen move on to the next signature campaign. There are much better managers than him who are more open to contact and explain their participants what's happening. SFR 10 is not looking for story writers as most of people say here because I have seen people in safe dice signature he is running that don't know to write in proper English language.

If you really think you are a good poster and write quality content move on to the next campaign or try one with automatic enrollment if there's any spot left there.

it is true. SFR10 is a good manager and very keen on reviewing quality of post of applicants. I rejected by him in his past campaigns because i'm aware that my post quality is not good. OP do same things as this to other manager that rejected him just like yahoo. So i think his words has no value and much better to ignore


Title: Re: [Open] Against BIT.AC Signature Campaign is Scam coz they Rejected 95% member .
Post by: nydiacaskey01 on September 15, 2016, 06:39:51 AM
If you really think you are a good poster and write quality content move on to the next campaign or try one with automatic enrollment if there's any spot left there.
How can you move to the next campaign if you are rejected by a campaign manager who runs multiple campaings in this forum. Also, example I was rejected by SFR10 and yahoo62278 accepted me in his campaign does that make yahoo62278 a less strict campaign manager? Much better to say improve post quality and apply again after a few weeks. All of the campaign managers have common goals and that is to get rid of those spammers and pay those who deserves to be paid.


Title: Re: [Open] Against BIT.AC Signature Campaign is Scam coz they Rejected 95% member .
Post by: Avirunes on September 15, 2016, 06:54:43 AM
If you really think you are a good poster and write quality content move on to the next campaign or try one with automatic enrollment if there's any spot left there.
How can you move to the next campaign if you are rejected by a campaign manager who runs multiple campaings in this forum. Also, example I was rejected by SFR10 and yahoo62278 accepted me in his campaign does that make yahoo62278 a less strict campaign manager? Much better to say improve post quality and apply again after a few weeks. All of the campaign managers have common goals and that is to get rid of those spammers and pay those who deserves to be paid.

If the applicant is rejected on the basis of quality then certainly not but if applicant is rejected on the basis of low no.  posts in concerned section where they want to grab attention then its worth trying to post application in other campaign as well.



Title: Re: [Open] Against BIT.AC Signature Campaign is Scam coz they Rejected 95% member .
Post by: olubams on September 15, 2016, 06:56:21 AM
SFR 10 has rejected all of my applications in the signature he is a manager of them and I didn't open a post like yours. When such thing happen move on to the next signature campaign. There are much better managers than him who are more open to contact and explain their participants what's happening. SFR 10 is not looking for story writers as most of people say here because I have seen people in safe dice signature he is running that don't know to write in proper English language.

If you really think you are a good poster and write quality content move on to the next campaign or try one with automatic enrollment if there's any spot left there.

I want to agree with you on this as campaign managers are at liberty to choose based on established criteria and most times on objectivity coupled with subjectivity, this can not be taken away from them and because they reject an application is not a necessity for name calling... @op if you are not ok with it just create your own campaign, manage it and reject their applications...


Title: Re: [Open] Against BIT.AC Signature Campaign is Scam coz they Rejected 95% member .
Post by: malcovixeffect on September 15, 2016, 07:07:09 AM
You are putting up a butthurt campaign while in other hand you are wearing other signature? That shows what clown you are, you are not even willing to use your joke signature. Are you a 12 yr old child?


Title: Re: [Open] Against BIT.AC Signature Campaign is Scam coz they Rejected 95% member .
Post by: choppork on September 15, 2016, 09:31:29 AM
Quote
Campaign Manager are just enrolling his own alt account its proof and you can see the Campaign Manager Rejected 95% Member
Nice proof you got there. Instead of crying about it in this place, why not think of a reason why he didn't accept you and all the other users? Maybe it's because you all have a low quality post and SFR doesn't want that. He simply just don't want to accept people who aren't qualified enough in his mind. SFR is also looking for people who aren't posting consecutively, he always advice that you post with as much interval as you can.


Title: Re: [Open] Against BIT.AC Signature Campaign is Scam coz they Rejected 95% member .
Post by: ultrloa on September 15, 2016, 12:37:22 PM
The two mentioned managers are the best one managers existing here and it is their Obligation to deny the user they like if they are didn't pass on their criteria, and don't be so butthurt so much OP for being denied by them just improve your post qualit so the other campaign managers would love to accept you, and don't used sock puppets to create an army to give some comments on how they run their campaign. So i will give my big thumbs up for those 2 guy.


Title: Re: [Open] Against BIT.AC Signature Campaign is Scam coz they Rejected 95% member .
Post by: DarkStar_ on September 15, 2016, 01:30:55 PM
SFR 10 has rejected all of my applications in the signature he is a manager of them and I didn't open a post like yours. When such thing happen move on to the next signature campaign. There are much better managers than him who are more open to contact and explain their participants what's happening.
I'm betting that it is because you discuss with your own alts, which is a really bad thing to do here and looked down on by the community.
https://i.imgur.com/FZwhNM9.png
Oh, and tipster threads are seen kinda like spam and not a great place to advertise.


Title: Re: [Open] Against BIT.AC Signature Campaign is Scam coz they Rejected 95% member .
Post by: leowonderful on September 16, 2016, 01:20:04 AM
All campaign managers have their own tendencies to reject and accept people into their campaigns; it's likely that you just didn't meet their criteria. Just because 95% of the people that applied got rejected doesn't mean that the campaign isn't legit; I'm sure there's a good reason why your main account got rejected, and if you just asked SFR he'd give you a perfectly good explanation on why you did get rejected. I ask that most of the time when I get rejected.


If your post quality is poor, improving instantly won't help. Give it time. It took me over a month to improve mine, and it's still admittedly not the best. The forum isn't about earning money 99.99% of the time, look for something you actually enjoy posting about and not some spam thread that you post on just to get paid. Signatures are advertising, and having poor post quality doesn't make it likely that someone will click on your signature.

The funniest part is that you yourself have alts; it's pretty much undeniable.


Title: Re: [Open] Against BIT.AC Signature Campaign is Scam coz they Rejected 95% member .
Post by: senyorito123 on September 16, 2016, 08:33:14 AM
Butthurt will always be butthurt cry now OP your not making any sense here, SFR10 have his own rights to choose on who and what kind of participants he wants on his campaign, and i think he is great since he doesn't allow those bad posters to join his campaign so better back off, your not doing a great job here, this thread will mark you off and im very sure campaign managers for now are having sone doubts to accept you in their campaigns.


Title: Re: [Open] Against BIT.AC Signature Campaign is Scam coz they Rejected 95% member .
Post by: lol lol on September 18, 2016, 04:26:42 AM
it is funny to see SFR10 participants defending him here :D

it is much funnier when you see participants of his campaigns spamming bullshit all over the forum and get paid for it fully.


example:
the topic is a rather old one which is bumped by spammers like this. and starter is asking how long does it take for bitcoin blockchain size grows too large
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1494001.0

here the reply
https://i.imgur.com/pY19SL7.jpg


Title: Re: [Open] Against BIT.AC Signature Campaign is Scam coz they Rejected 95% member .
Post by: eaLiTy on September 18, 2016, 05:15:41 AM
it is funny to see SFR10 participants defending him here :D

it is much funnier when you see participants of his campaigns spamming bullshit all over the forum and get paid for it fully.


example:
the topic is a rather old one which is bumped by spammers like this. and starter is asking how long does it take for bitcoin blockchain size grows too large
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1494001.0

here the reply
https://i.imgur.com/pY19SL7.jpg

i can see that you are frustrated about SFR10,he has rejected me too and said two answers at different times for the rejections ,he is the manager that runs the campaign he soley has the rights to reject or accept anyone,there may be more than 10k active users who are qualified for the campaign ,he cannot choose everyone,he does have the authority to reject application and more over this forum is not meant to earn bitcoins,just consider campaigns as tip jars.  ;)

hope you have created new alts just for this thread  ;D  ;D
1.https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=818926

and

2.https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=880675


Title: Re: [Open] Against BIT.AC Signature Campaign is Scam coz they Rejected 95% member .
Post by: isen on September 18, 2016, 05:58:38 AM

hope you have created new alts just for this thread ;D  ;D
1.https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=818926

and

2.https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=880675

To be fair I think that LifeLine does not belong to him but it is one of OP's many aliases,the rest are CapitalTalk,BitDiscussion,GoodLuck2,ForumBit..and probably more that i am not aware atm.
But still it's funny to see people hiding behind alts and cry for their rejection.


Title: Re: [Open] Against BIT.AC Signature Campaign is Scam coz they Rejected 95% member .
Post by: Lauda on September 22, 2016, 11:13:20 AM
I've looked into your posting activity. The primary reason (if not the sole reason) for the rejection of your application is your horrible posting quality. It can be clearly seen on page 2 and 3 of your posts that you're farming up your post count by replying in low quality, generic thread with 1-2 liners expressing useless input (e.g. "I think.. x").

That being said, you've made false and defamatory statements against SF10 and this campaign without having any evidence to back this up. This is an act of calumny, which I can not approve of.


Title: Re: [Open] Against BIT.AC Signature Campaign is Scam coz they Reject 95% member .
Post by: Decoded on September 22, 2016, 12:05:35 PM
I've seen Laiksis complaining way too many times about his inability to get into a campaign. Nuke already. Reminds me of those trolls that used to run rampant here. **Shudder**

Hey man, i realize your pissed off

It's you're goddamit


Title: Re: [Open] Against BIT.AC Signature Campaign is Scam coz they Rejected 95% member .
Post by: mishra1994u on September 24, 2016, 05:33:34 PM
No you cant say like that.They are the one who are paying for it and it is only and only their wish who they select and who they reject.They can even reject 99% participants and only accept 1 in a 100.But as long as they are paying to that 1% accepted you cannot call them scam.


Title: Re: [Open] Against BIT.AC Signature Campaign is Scam coz they Rejected 95% member .
Post by: gkv9 on September 28, 2016, 07:30:44 PM
OP, it's still unacceptable unless you show some strong and solid proof against SFR10...
Happy to see that SFR10 didn't reply to such threads as he knows his work and he is doing it good IMHO...
Look OP or SFR10, neither am I with anyone of you nor am I against, if OP proves SFR10 guilty, it will definitely have an adverse impact on the careers of many managers here... Will be quite interesting to watch...