Bitcoin Forum

Other => Politics & Society => Topic started by: saddampbuh on November 04, 2016, 09:31:58 AM



Title: Jews on UK High Court Attempting to Cockblock Brexit
Post by: saddampbuh on November 04, 2016, 09:31:58 AM
http://www.dailystormer.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/brexit4.png

Quote
Earlier today, three drag queens on the pretentious UK High Court managed to sabotage the will of the British people yet again.

The phenomenon of judicial tyranny has become a contemporary staple in Anglo-Saxon plutocracies. The decision making power of the ballot has become nothing more than a novelty governments ignore when votes are inconvenient, whether it’s Proposition 8 in California, or now Brexit. Many communist countries during the Cold War had similar symbolic plebiscites and elections, but at least the 1970’s-80’s USSR wasn’t trying to exterminate its native people unlike the current dying Atlanticist powers.

The Supreme Court of the United States is known to be almost half Jewish, the United Kingdom is no different. Here are the three individuals electing themselves arbitrators of British destiny.
http://www.dailystormer.com/uk-high-court-blocks-brexit/


Title: Re: Jews on UK High Court Attempting to Cockblock Brexit
Post by: Masha Sha on November 04, 2016, 09:52:21 AM
I don't see in what would the judeo-ethno-democratic-socialist-nationalist supremacists have an interest in one way or the others. Your judgement is clouded I guess.

However the term drag queens made laugh... then it the control of institution by the judeo-ethno-democratic-socialistnatrionalist is quite impressive, it's statistically a problem.

Would be curious to read the interpretation of those data point by Watson... however he may end up like TayAI if he doesn't repeat the party line.... however one day one AI will learn to LIE ;).

How could they know...


Title: Re: High Court ruling on Brexit
Post by: DooMAD on November 04, 2016, 11:02:25 PM
Disregarding the OP and thread title entirely, for the sake of balance and sanity, there's a less absurd article here:

http://www.economist.com/news/britain/21709589-high-court-rules-parliament-must-vote-trigger-brexit-process-taking-back-control

At this point, It's highly unlikely that anyone in parliament could successfully block Britain triggering article 50 and leaving the EU.  What having a parliamentary debate about it should hopefully accomplish is to ensure we have an actual plan (something I find highly doubtful at present) and conduct this quite significant break-up in an intelligent way, causing as little damage as possible.  Screw prime minister Mayhem and her (blow)hard Brexit drivel.

It's rather unnerving to see that those in the general public who voted for Brexit in the name of "taking back control" from the European parliament and restoring the sovereignty of the UK parliament are now so furious about our parliament being allowed to have a say.  That's what you voted for, isn't it?  Or did none of you actually have the faintest clue what you were voting for aside from "boo, foreigners".   ::)



Title: Re: Jews on UK High Court Attempting to Cockblock Brexit
Post by: Morbid on November 04, 2016, 11:17:38 PM
zionists would be a better term for this context..


Title: Re: High Court ruling on Brexit
Post by: saddampbuh on November 04, 2016, 11:49:00 PM
It's rather unnerving to see that those in the general public who voted for Brexit in the name of "taking back control" from the European parliament and restoring the sovereignty of the UK parliament are now so furious about our parliament being allowed to have a say.  That's what you voted for, isn't it?  Or did none of you actually have the faintest clue what you were voting for aside from "boo, foreigners".   ::)
parliament already had its say when it voted to hold the referendum


Title: Re: High Court ruling on Brexit
Post by: DooMAD on November 05, 2016, 12:17:10 AM
It's rather unnerving to see that those in the general public who voted for Brexit in the name of "taking back control" from the European parliament and restoring the sovereignty of the UK parliament are now so furious about our parliament being allowed to have a say.  That's what you voted for, isn't it?  Or did none of you actually have the faintest clue what you were voting for aside from "boo, foreigners".   ::)
parliament already had its say when it voted to hold the referendum

Yes, and now that we've had the referendum, we need to decide how best to leave.  No one endorsed a particular Brexit strategy in the referendum.  Instead, the public gave a general verdict of "out".  The end outcome will still be honoured, but the method is yet to be defined.  That's what needs to be debated.  We need to try and make a success of it. 

Those whining about this high court verdict would apparently quite happily embrace a grossly authoritarian political culture and abandon the rule of law if it suited their agenda.  The pathetic outcry over this quite sensible judgement is a damning indictment of the unhinged mentality of hardliners.  Feel free to hastily cut off your own nose to spite your face, but the rest of us would prefer a little more caution and sense.


Title: Re: Jews on UK High Court Attempting to Cockblock Brexit
Post by: Sithara007 on November 05, 2016, 05:32:34 AM
I don't think that anyone will be able to block the Brexit, as the majority of the Brits have voted for it. The European Union itself is a failed concept. Unless Merkel changes her dictatorial tone, we are going to see many more countries seceding from the EU.


Title: Re: Jews on UK High Court Attempting to Cockblock Brexit
Post by: popcorn1 on November 05, 2016, 05:41:54 AM
Moody and bond rating[edit]
Moody's was later merged into Dun & Bradstreet, only to again become an independent corporation in October 2000. Moody's status is reflected in Thomas Friedman's 1996 comment: that

There are two superpowers in the world today in my opinion. There's the United States and there's Moody's Bond Rating Service. The United States can destroy you by dropping bombs, and Moody's can destroy you by downgrading your bonds. And believe me, it's not clear sometimes who's more powerful. (February 13, 1996 interview with Jim Lehrer)..Best friends with CITI BANK ;)..

The threats to lower Britain's credit rating if we leave ::)..

Moody's Analytics election model predicts Clinton win
AOL News‎ - 3 days ago
Nov 1 (Reuters) - Low gas prices and President Barack Obama's high approval ratings are .

Now we all know the election is rigged..TRUMP as way more supporters than HILLARY..

Moody's predicts anything that suits their agenda..Example..If they make the money ;)..

The USA and the UK are the same people running the money..Making there family friends money no one else ..The rest of us are slaves..

It's time to change politics were politicians have no way of fiddling the system ;)..

One rule that must change is no politician can have a family member in power for 150 years..
Meaning if i was the president then no one in my family can become a president for 150 years..

Just look at America it's the same people in power if it's not me brother it's me uncle if it's not me uncle it's me cousin if it's not me cousin it's me best friend..
Meaning the power is the same people telling us what and how we should live our lives..
When it's the people that should be telling them what to do..

Just showing people why i wanted out the same people in business are running my life..
IT'S NOT DEMOCRACY >:( >:(..IT'S LINING THE SUPER RICH POCKETS..

They are destroying the planet for there greed ..They are blind to what they are doing because of the money..MONEY MONEY MONEY IT MAKES PEOPLE FUNNY..

You people need to know what happens when low or high taxes get paid to governments..
Take to much tax people flee..Take to less tax and your people suffer..
I.E bad roads schools criminal activity rises..


Title: Re: High Court ruling on Brexit
Post by: popcorn1 on November 05, 2016, 07:01:40 AM
It's rather unnerving to see that those in the general public who voted for Brexit in the name of "taking back control" from the European parliament and restoring the sovereignty of the UK parliament are now so furious about our parliament being allowed to have a say.  That's what you voted for, isn't it?  Or did none of you actually have the faintest clue what you were voting for aside from "boo, foreigners".   ::)
parliament already had its say when it voted to hold the referendum

Yes, and now that we've had the referendum, we need to decide how best to leave.  No one endorsed a particular Brexit strategy in the referendum.  Instead, the public gave a general verdict of "out".  The end outcome will still be honoured, but the method is yet to be defined.  That's what needs to be debated.  We need to try and make a success of it. 

Those whining about this high court verdict would apparently quite happily embrace a grossly authoritarian political culture and abandon the rule of law if it suited their agenda.  The pathetic outcry over this quite sensible judgement is a damning indictment of the unhinged mentality of hardliners.  Feel free to hastily cut off your own nose to spite your face, but the rest of us would prefer a little more caution and sense.
Remoners what don't you get about the meaning of Brexit?..

Brexit to me was no free movement of people and to change the elite businesses that are paying our politicians backhanders to do what they want..

I wanted to prove to businesses out there that if you leave we can make what you do and sell to our people your product..We make it our selves and sell it to our selves..

And the person who just set this new company up must now pay his or her proper taxes
And if you leave for cheaper labour then you will not sell your product on our markets..

It makes me angry knowing a company can hold a country to ransom >:( >:(..
If i was in power i would make you pay your way ;)..

If your making billions and your ripping the tax system off you should be in jail..
GREEDY FUCKERS >:(..
Anyone with 50 million and wants to rip the public with more taxes should be shot ;D..
GREEDY FUCKERS..
I always say if you made enough give someone else a chance..
But what is enough to some people..

Obama borrowed double the debt you already had in all of history..Meaning he robbed loads and so did all his CRONIES..

Then our soldiers police secret agents all put there lives in danger to line the politicians and big businesses pockets..So war is to line someones pockets not because your country is in danger but to line someones pockets..Yes there is threats but most are to line someones pockets..
So your used as a pawn to make there lives better not yours but there lives only..
Human cannon fodder..

Now because we don't want free movement of people in the EU ..The Eu said no free trade?..
MEANING WE ARE FULLY OUT..But when we say we are leaving what does leaving mean..
IT MEANS WE ARE FUCKING OUT >:(GONE BYE..

Now you already know that we brexit people want no free movement of people?
And you already know that the EU as said they want free movement or no free trade?..

So what more do you need to know we are OUT?..So what say as anyone got?..NONE..
You remoaners just wont let go..
We want out we don't care if the EU does no trade if they be funny yes we MIGHT and i say MIGHT suffer but we are ready to deal with it because we British can do ANYTHING..
We are way to smart to crumble..

Just look at ICELAND 350k people doing better than the uk Not in the EU..

The deal the Eu done with CANADA do they get to have free movement of EU citizens in Canada?.
So anyone from the EU can live and get a home for free in Canada like they can in the UK..

No well that's not right..Why should we have free movement and pay 10 billion to the EU
But Canada pays nothing and has no free movement..

If we don't leave now we will be the laughing stock of the world..
The usa france will look at Britain as shitbags..The leaders will be happy because they are lining there own pockets but the people will look at us like SHIT >:(..

Please mrs may trigger our new better bright future in march..
We then got 2 years to discuss business..

I am not European i am British..If anything the EU made me do more hours in work from 39 to 42 hour a week..Not that i am bothered.. But i am that someone made me work more hours instead of asking me too..

MOST OF YOU POLITICIANS ARE SCUM BAG THIEVES  ;D..

When will a leader ever go to jail to make an example to the next leader that
NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW NO ONE.. NOT EVEN THE LAW IS ABOVE THE LAW..
The law is set by the people for the people and no one shall be above it NO ONE.

And yes our governments could be bad but at least most people can get to London most will never be able to get to Belgium to complain..
And we can change who we want telling us what to do every 4 or 5 years not with the EU..

So to all you reamoners WE ARE OUT what does out mean?..Meaning we are gone ;)..
We have NATO and the UN for war..So our countries can act together..
So why the need for the EU?..

The whole world will want to live in the uk if we let free movement of people..
Over run system..And the super rich wont even live here to feel it..
BUT they will be enjoying the money..


Title: Re: Jews on UK High Court Attempting to Cockblock Brexit
Post by: Bitbobb on November 05, 2016, 07:09:16 AM
GURANTEED: The "Elite" will be murdering babies and children tonight (especially) and tomorrow night to gain favors with the dark forces before the USA election. This is not a joke.  It is NOT a ruse or "conspiracy story". There is a well known testimony by Viki Polin that was done on Oprah that you can still find on Youtube where she talks about it also. The murders will happen at midnight on the East coast, and at midnight in each time zone up until approximately 2AM in each time zone.

TO HAVE A SHOT AT PREVENTING THE ELECTION FROM BEING STOLEN BY DARK FORCES, WHICH ARE BUILDING POWER TONIGHT (ESPECIALLY) BY MURDERING CHILDREN, WE NEED TO PRAY THROUGH THEIR CEREMONIES TO CANCEL THEIR BENEFIT AND I AM NOT JOKING.
If you have not prayed for years but believe in God, now would be a great time to pray again. It will not take many people focusing on the topic to wreck their ceremonies, the people that hit this web site will probably be enough. What would I pray for and what would I say?

1. Dear God, we did not ask for this filthy corrupted government that is turning America into a filthy and corrupted nation, they got into power via deception. Please return our freedom from tyranny and do not let their evil works benefit them tonight or any other night. Please let America return to a righteous leadership that has respect for the individual who believes in Godly principle.

2. Dear God, please bless the souls of those who will be murdered for the purpose of turning this nation to final darkness and be there, at every ceremony where these children will be murdered. Please take their souls and comfort them, so Satan receives NOTHING. Please "sour" their ceremonies with holiness and render their effects neutral.

3. Dear God, Please bring America to righteous status as a righteous world leader by stopping those who have worked so hard to wreck America's morality, and by stopping those who have used this great nation to spread disaster via war around the globe. Please do not let the election be stolen and instead, put into power those who will bring America away from the edge of final spiritual darkness. Please give the American people what they have asked for, and bring America back into the light.

If you can think of anything else to say, SAY IT. We need huge numbers doing this. Focus on this for a long period of time, especially at midnight in your area and if you are not in a U.S. time zone, pick a time in the U.S. that corresponds with midnight in either Eastern or Pacific time, because that is when a majority of the satanic activities will be happening. If we can muster enough power it will beyond a doubt have a significant impact on everyone's future.


Title: Re: Jews on UK High Court Attempting to Cockblock Brexit
Post by: popcorn1 on November 05, 2016, 07:35:39 AM
It's all about the money :D..Man to make your life very good is what money does?..
It's all about the money END OF STORY..
Then what happens i could imagine is the power gets to their heads then i could imagine humans could get together like a gang and have there rituals and codes of conducts like sacrifice..
You might get some nut cases thinking like this because of the power..
The way humans can think is fucking crazy sometimes..Religion to name one..

BUT IT'S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY..THE MONEY IS THE POWER..
THE GOLD.. THE LAND.. THE OIL ..THE DRUGS ..THE LOANS.. THE GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS..
ALL POWER..

Things have got to change..Same old system I.E people for the last 150 years..
They are making there children's children's lives better but not your children and your future children..They are creating slaves to debt for the BANKERS


Title: Re: Jews on UK High Court Attempting to Cockblock Brexit
Post by: Masha Sha on November 05, 2016, 10:00:00 AM
Skimming quickly I don't think the term Zionist isn't appropriated. It lacks the ethnic component (sanyanims and others non "tribes" members of the "Zionist" movement).

Then it's really important to recognize that a vast majority of the "tribe" is not even aware of those. And anyway this all agenda centered around Jerusalem and isreal becomes totally insignifiant in the face of the mass of China and Russia resistance.

But yes I find ironic too that freedom of movement isn't included. However I am not sure the situation in Canada is really better than in the us and that it would be a safe propositions.

Edit: yep, freeing the captives would be even greater than praying for them...




Title: Re: High Court ruling on Brexit
Post by: saddampbuh on November 05, 2016, 10:14:40 AM
Yes, and now that we've had the referendum, we need to decide how best to leave.  No one endorsed a particular Brexit strategy in the referendum.  Instead, the public gave a general verdict of "out".  The end outcome will still be honoured, but the method is yet to be defined.  That's what needs to be debated.  We need to try and make a success of it. 

Those whining about this high court verdict would apparently quite happily embrace a grossly authoritarian political culture and abandon the rule of law if it suited their agenda.  The pathetic outcry over this quite sensible judgement is a damning indictment of the unhinged mentality of hardliners.  Feel free to hastily cut off your own nose to spite your face, but the rest of us would prefer a little more caution and sense.
i dont think you understand how this works. the eu wont hold formal negotiations with us until we officially tell them we're leaving by invoking article 50. this has to be done before any replacement treaty can be put before parliament because until we invoke article 50 and begin the process of leaving there isn't going to be one on the table. the only method of leaving the eu is triggering article 50 as both sides told us during the referendum campaign. this verdict prevents the pm from doing that. its not about seeking parliament's consent for whatever we end up signing with the eu once we leave but on the act of leaving itself. parliament wants a veto over the referendum it voted to authorise because it doesn't like the result and the jews have given it one.

and fuck parliament and parliamentary democracy in general. its not as if it is ever representative of the people who elect it. ukip 3.9 million votes and 1 seat snp marxists 1 million votes and 50 seats. 52% of the country wanting to leave the eu and 80% of mps wanting to stay. 3 "major parties" which for some reason still includes the lib dems which get fewer votes than ukip conspiring to enshrine into law the giving away of 0.7% of our gdp in aid when polls show that 80% of people don't want it happening. a dictatorship would be far more in keeping with the popular mood.


Title: Re: High Court ruling on Brexit
Post by: Masha Sha on November 05, 2016, 10:32:40 AM
Yes, and now that we've had the referendum, we need to decide how best to leave.  No one endorsed a particular Brexit strategy in the referendum.  Instead, the public gave a general verdict of "out".  The end outcome will still be honoured, but the method is yet to be defined.  That's what needs to be debated.  We need to try and make a success of it. 

Those whining about this high court verdict would apparently quite happily embrace a grossly authoritarian political culture and abandon the rule of law if it suited their agenda.  The pathetic outcry over this quite sensible judgement is a damning indictment of the unhinged mentality of hardliners.  Feel free to hastily cut off your own nose to spite your face, but the rest of us would prefer a little more caution and sense.
i dont think you understand how this works. the eu wont hold formal negotiations with us until we officially tell them we're leaving by invoking article 50. this has to be done before any replacement treaty can be put before parliament because until we invoke article 50 and begin the process of leaving there isn't going to be one on the table. the only method of leaving the eu is triggering article 50 as both sides told us during the referendum campaign. this verdict prevents the pm from doing that. its not about seeking parliament's consent for whatever we end up signing with the eu once we leave but on the act of leaving itself. parliament wants a veto over the referendum it voted to authorise because it doesn't like the result and the jews have given it one.

and fuck parliament and parliamentary democracy in general. its not as if it is ever representative of the people who elect it. ukip 3.9 million votes and 1 seat snp marxists 1 million votes and 50 seats. 52% of the country wanting to leave the eu and 80% of mps wanting to stay. 3 "major parties" which for some reason still includes the lib dems which get fewer votes than ukip conspiring to enshrine into law the giving away of 0.7% of our gdp in aid when polls show that 80% of people don't want it happening. a dictatorship would be far more in keeping with the popular mood.

LoL on your last remark... technically right now the USA is in a civil war, so you know brexit, what ever, once the American core of the conspiracy is defeated a lot of things will change, the only question will the United States of America need to be defeated to reach those targeted at the core?



Title: Re: High Court ruling on Brexit
Post by: DooMAD on November 05, 2016, 10:35:05 AM
Yes, and now that we've had the referendum, we need to decide how best to leave.  No one endorsed a particular Brexit strategy in the referendum.  Instead, the public gave a general verdict of "out".  The end outcome will still be honoured, but the method is yet to be defined.  That's what needs to be debated.  We need to try and make a success of it. 

Those whining about this high court verdict would apparently quite happily embrace a grossly authoritarian political culture and abandon the rule of law if it suited their agenda.  The pathetic outcry over this quite sensible judgement is a damning indictment of the unhinged mentality of hardliners.  Feel free to hastily cut off your own nose to spite your face, but the rest of us would prefer a little more caution and sense.
i dont think you understand how this works. the eu wont hold formal negotiations with us until we officially tell them we're leaving by invoking article 50. this has to be done before any replacement treaty can be put before parliament because until we invoke article 50 and begin the process of leaving there isn't going to be one on the table. the only method of leaving the eu is triggering article 50 as both sides told us during the referendum campaign. this verdict prevents the pm from doing that. its not about seeking parliament's consent for whatever we end up signing with the eu once we leave but on the act of leaving itself. parliament wants a veto over the referendum it voted to authorise because it doesn't like the result and the jews have given it one.

and fuck parliament and parliamentary democracy in general. its not as if it is ever representative of the people who elect it. ukip 3.9 million votes and 1 seat snp marxists 1 million votes and 50 seats. 52% of the country wanting to leave the eu and 80% of mps wanting to stay. 3 "major parties" which for some reason still includes the lib dems which get fewer votes than ukip conspiring to enshrine into law the giving away of 0.7% of our gdp in aid when polls show that 80% of people don't want it happening. a dictatorship would be far more in keeping with the popular mood.

No, this verdict doesn't prevent the PM from invoking article 50, it just prevents her from doing it in an incredibly stupid and arrogant way.  Again, the most likely outcome is that article 50 will still be triggered, but the debate will determine what we'll attempt to bargain for when we do.  If you're going to talk figures, then yes, 52% of the British public voted to leave the EU, but only 24% of the country voted Conservative.  So it follows that people didn’t vote for the terms of Brexit to be dictated by the Conservatives.  Also, no one, that's zero percent of the public, voted for Theresa Mayhem, so there's no way in hell she's calling all the shots.


Title: Re: High Court ruling on Brexit
Post by: saddampbuh on November 05, 2016, 01:34:50 PM
No, this verdict doesn't prevent the PM from invoking article 50, it just prevents her from doing it in an incredibly stupid and arrogant way.  Again, the most likely outcome is that article 50 will still be triggered, but the debate will determine what we'll attempt to bargain for when we do.
bremoaner spin. it does prevent her from invoking article 50 .

“The government does not have power under the crown’s prerogative to give notice pursuant to article 50 for the UK to withdraw from the European Union.”
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/nov/03/parliament-must-trigger-brexit-high-court-rules

this traitor is telling the government it has to go back to mps to get permission for something the last government already got permission for

agreed mps will probably go along with it but on the condition we carry on making payments and accepting all the eu's rules and judgements and the free movement of people. this is not a conspiracy theory but literally what the bremoaners like clegg have told us they are aiming for. mps will try and force us to stay in the eu in all but name with all the unwanted trappings of the single market.

Quote
If you're going to talk figures, then yes, 52% of the British public voted to leave the EU, but only 24% of the country voted Conservative.  So it follows that people didn’t vote for the terms of Brexit to be dictated by the Conservatives.  Also, no one, that's zero percent of the public, voted for Theresa Mayhem, so there's no way in hell she's calling all the shots.
if you add the ukip and dup vote to that of the tories there is slightly above 50% for brexit but its not all that important. if an election were held today the tories would win by 100 seats. the only reason may doesn't want to call one is corbyn will have to resign afterwards and she wants to keep him around as long as possible.

a truly representative parliament would have given us the tories in coalition with 80+ ukip mps, paving the way for genuine nationalism a couple of elections down the line. no wonder the traitorous establishment hates pr, referendums and anything else that expresses the popular will.


Title: Re: Jews on UK High Court Attempting to Cockblock Brexit
Post by: saddampbuh on November 05, 2016, 03:58:00 PM
• The legal bid appears to have been initiated by Alex Chesterman, a Jewish businessman.
• The bid was delegated to the law firm Mischon de Reya, founded by a Jewish lawyer, and that has retained a strong synthesis between its work and that of Jewish interests.
• The legal bid has been led by a Jewish lawyer, David Pannick, QC.
• In an effort to obscure the staffing and clientele behind the bid, David Pannick approached the Royal Courts of Justice to obtain masking measures for the bid. This measure was granted by Lord Justice Sir Brian Leveson, also Jewish.
• Finally, the legal bid was accepted by three judges at the High Court, two of whom, Terence Etherton and Philip Sales, are Jewish.
Jews are thought to comprise around 0.5% of the British population, and in light of this statistic the demonstrable prominence of Jews in the legal challenge against Brexit must be seen as nothing less than remarkable


Title: Re: Jews on UK High Court Attempting to Cockblock Brexit
Post by: bryant.coleman on November 05, 2016, 06:25:56 PM
• The legal bid appears to have been initiated by Alex Chesterman, a Jewish businessman.
• The bid was delegated to the law firm Mischon de Reya, founded by a Jewish lawyer, and that has retained a strong synthesis between its work and that of Jewish interests.
• The legal bid has been led by a Jewish lawyer, David Pannick, QC.
• In an effort to obscure the staffing and clientele behind the bid, David Pannick approached the Royal Courts of Justice to obtain masking measures for the bid. This measure was granted by Lord Justice Sir Brian Leveson, also Jewish.
• Finally, the legal bid was accepted by three judges at the High Court, two of whom, Terence Etherton and Philip Sales, are Jewish.
Jews are thought to comprise around 0.5% of the British population, and in light of this statistic the demonstrable prominence of Jews in the legal challenge against Brexit must be seen as nothing less than remarkable

The Jews are still having a huge influence in the Western nations, although they have been driven away from the Eastern European nations such as Russia, Poland, and Romania. Look at the American presidential elections. Despite constituting for just 1.5% of the total population, more than half of the donations for Hitlery has come from the Jews.


Title: Re: Jews on UK High Court Attempting to Cockblock Brexit
Post by: saddampbuh on November 05, 2016, 06:41:47 PM
The Jews are still having a huge influence in the Western nations, although they have been driven away from the Eastern European nations such as Russia, Poland, and Romania. Look at the American presidential elections. Despite constituting for just 1.5% of the total population, more than half of the donations for Hitlery has come from the Jews.
yes i made a topic about that and got called antisemitic despite providing the proof which was of course ignored, they have recreated the same corruption in america and west european countries that led to their destruction 70-80 years ago, either they aren't aware of it or they think their money and influence will save them

what's interesting about the american election is that trump gets hardly any support from jewish donors despite being friendly with israel and having jewish family members, they know they can't use him to flood america with third wold immigrants and carry on their wars and that's what matters most to them


Title: Re: Jews on UK High Court Attempting to Cockblock Brexit
Post by: Daniel91 on November 05, 2016, 06:59:28 PM
I really think that you are to much paranoid here.
It seems that you see Jews everywhere.
UK high court made legal decision according to the law.
Religion or nationality of judges are irrelevant
UK government have choice to accept it or appeal the court's decision to the Supreme Court.
It's legal system in action, nothing strange or illegal here.
UK is not ''third world'' country but longest democracy in the world.




Title: Re: Jews on UK High Court Attempting to Cockblock Brexit
Post by: Bitbobb on November 05, 2016, 08:37:23 PM
The Jews are still having a huge influence in the Western nations, although they have been driven away from the Eastern European nations such as Russia, Poland, and Romania. Look at the American presidential elections. Despite constituting for just 1.5% of the total population, more than half of the donations for Hitlery has come from the Jews.
yes i made a topic about that and got called antisemitic despite providing the proof which was of course ignored, they have recreated the same corruption in america and west european countries that led to their destruction 70-80 years ago, either they aren't aware of it or they think their money and influence will save them

what's interesting about the american election is that trump gets hardly any support from jewish donors despite being friendly with israel and having jewish family members, they know they can't use him to flood america with third wold immigrants and carry on their wars and that's what matters most to them

Would you be interested to know that Jews were suggested to be banned from USA by the founding fathers?  The concern was that they join countries but never assimilate.  For 10 generations they will live among you in their own collective groups and therefore they are not there to improve the country but to improve their group at the expense of the country they inhabit.  This was Geo. Washinton that offer this caution in the form of a ban.  And it was rejected.


Title: Re: Jews on UK High Court Attempting to Cockblock Brexit
Post by: saddampbuh on November 05, 2016, 08:42:25 PM
I really think that you are to much paranoid here.
It seems that you see Jews everywhere.
UK high court made legal decision according to the law.
Religion or nationality of judges are irrelevant
UK government have choice to accept it or appeal the court's decision to the Supreme Court.
It's legal system in action, nothing strange or illegal here.
UK is not ''third world'' country but longest democracy in the world.
a majority of british people (and a significant majority at that if the votes of foreigners are discounted) voted to leave the eu. jewish lawyers, judges and financiers are conspiring to prevent the will of the people from being carried out.

are we to suppose it is pure coincidence that in every country in which they live and are allowed to hold positions of power jews use their influence to take decisions that run contrary to the wishes of the people in their host nation

Would you be interested to know that Jews were suggested to be banned from USA by the founding fathers?  The concern was that they join countries but never assimilate.  For 10 generations they will live among you in their own collective groups and therefore they are not there to improve the country but to improve their group at the expense of the country they inhabit.  This was Geo. Washinton that offer this caution in the form of a ban.  And it was rejected.
indeed and this is true for many other nations in which they have resided throughout the millenia. the trouble is they are too good at blending in with the natives as they come in all ethnicities and skin tones and need only change their clothes and their names. they have pretended to be white, arabic, spanish and turkish at various times in history. "the eternal jew" should be mandatory viewing in schools.


Title: Re: Jews on UK High Court Attempting to Cockblock Brexit
Post by: Bitbobb on November 05, 2016, 11:46:17 PM
I really think that you are to much paranoid here.
It seems that you see Jews everywhere.
UK high court made legal decision according to the law.
Religion or nationality of judges are irrelevant
UK government have choice to accept it or appeal the court's decision to the Supreme Court.
It's legal system in action, nothing strange or illegal here.
UK is not ''third world'' country but longest democracy in the world.
a majority of british people (and a significant majority at that if the votes of foreigners are discounted) voted to leave the eu. jewish lawyers, judges and financiers are conspiring to prevent the will of the people from being carried out.

are we to suppose it is pure coincidence that in every country in which they live and are allowed to hold positions of power jews use their influence to take decisions that run contrary to the wishes of the people in their host nation

Would you be interested to know that Jews were suggested to be banned from USA by the founding fathers?  The concern was that they join countries but never assimilate.  For 10 generations they will live among you in their own collective groups and therefore they are not there to improve the country but to improve their group at the expense of the country they inhabit.  This was Geo. Washinton that offer this caution in the form of a ban.  And it was rejected.
indeed and this is true for many other nations in which they have resided throughout the millenia. the trouble is they are too good at blending in with the natives as they come in all ethnicities and skin tones and need only change their clothes and their names. they have pretended to be white, arabic, spanish and turkish at various times in history. "the eternal jew" should be mandatory viewing in schools.

Yeah and one of the weapons is the "arranged marriage"  The young woman never reveals to the man (or visa versa) that they are in fact Jewish.  Hillpill is one example with Bill.  Another famous example is the famous actress that befriended Michael Jackson.  When she died all the christian people at her christian funeral got stood up because SURPRISE!  she was jewish the whole time.  just wanted to get close to Michael for whatever purpose.


Title: Re: Jews on UK High Court Attempting to Cockblock Brexit
Post by: popcorn1 on November 06, 2016, 07:34:41 AM
Jews Muslims Christians Atheist..Are to blame not just Jews ;)..
When money is concerned it's every man or women for them selves ;)..

Yes Jews are good at making money..But why get jealous do what they do..
SAVE UP and buy a business or do loans with interest..

And 1 good thing Jews are good at is thinking how to make something to sell..
To create to sell to the masses..

People need to know that 1 way how you make yourself rich is..
YOU NEED TO PRODUCE SOMETHING THAT EVERYBODY WANTS..
Then you can become super rich..
Then you can pay anybody to do what you want them to do..TO BE YOUR BITCH ;)..
As the saying goes everybody as a price?..
Judges presidents prime ministers all have a price..

So what we as people need to do is stop the loop holes were leaders have no way of fiddling the system..
I.E to be bought and fiddling with contracts and stop them using the taxes how they see fit so they cannot tax skim anymore..stop leaders from becoming a thief..

Because..https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6Z_U7jJMAM..

So just don't blame Jews everybody is at it..Money as no religion or colour ONLY GREED..
The more money you got the more you can do..

If your jealous of the Jews because of money ..Then learn to do what they do..
think think think while you save save save..Then build or open a business..

I cannot get jealous over something like that it's to be admired if anything..Clever..

When you get to the top.You tend to want to stay there..So what will some people do to stay there is anyone's guess..




Title: Re: Jews on UK High Court Attempting to Cockblock Brexit
Post by: Bitbobb on November 06, 2016, 08:14:49 AM



Title: Re: High Court ruling on Brexit
Post by: DooMAD on November 06, 2016, 11:42:10 PM
Not sure what the Clinton pic has to do with the rest of the thread, so I'll try to adjust the course of the conversation back to Blighty, as it were.  As I've been stating recently in other threads (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1637427.msg16467234#msg16467234), the UK is, in many ways, undeniably taking a swing towards hardline fascism and people should be seriously concerned by that.  In the case of this particular ruling, certain disgusting gutter rags that people, for reasons beyond my comprehension, often mislabel as "newspapers", appear to be drawing inspiration from sources that no one should ever dare draw inspiration from:

https://scontent-lhr3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/14947878_1828646354071258_4184568159696365957_n.jpg?oh=0fb259970d8bd0ad8d7f96405d12556b&oe=58979E0F

The direct translation of 'Volksverräter' technically means 'traitors of the people', but the comparison is close enough to be relevant.  Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.  Stop regressing to such a primitive and archaic mindset.  


Title: Re: High Court ruling on Brexit
Post by: saddampbuh on November 07, 2016, 01:28:38 AM
Not sure what the Clinton pic has to do with the rest of the thread, so I'll try to adjust the course of the conversation back to Blighty, as it were.  As I've been stating recently in other threads (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1637427.msg16467234#msg16467234), the UK is, in many ways, undeniably taking a swing towards hardline fascism and people should be seriously concerned by that.  In the case of this particular ruling, certain disgusting gutter rags that people, for reasons beyond my comprehension, often mislabel as "newspapers", appear to be drawing inspiration from sources that no one should ever dare draw inspiration from:

https://scontent-lhr3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/14947878_1828646354071258_4184568159696365957_n.jpg?oh=0fb259970d8bd0ad8d7f96405d12556b&oe=58979E0F[/img]

The direct translation of 'Volksverräter' technically means 'traitors of the people', but the comparison is close enough to be relevant.  Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.  Stop regressing to such a primitive and archaic mindset.  

would you have us believe the (((people))) who launched a communist uprising and brought america into ww1 causing germany to lose, signed up to versailles and then used the "independent judiciary" to imprison anyone who spoke out against the humiliation WEREN'T enemies to the german people? or is it one of those everyone who disagrees with me is hitler memes leftists trot out when they can't think of anything to say.


Title: Re: High Court ruling on Brexit
Post by: Bitbobb on November 07, 2016, 01:40:49 AM
Not sure what the Clinton pic has to do with the rest of the thread, so I'll try to adjust the course of the conversation back to Blighty, as it were.  As I've been stating recently in other threads (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1637427.msg16467234#msg16467234), the UK is, in many ways, undeniably taking a swing towards hardline fascism and people should be seriously concerned by that.  In the case of this particular ruling, certain disgusting gutter rags that people, for reasons beyond my comprehension, often mislabel as "newspapers", appear to be drawing inspiration from sources that no one should ever dare draw inspiration from:

The direct translation of 'Volksverräter' technically means 'traitors of the people', but the comparison is close enough to be relevant.  Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.  Stop regressing to such a primitive and archaic mindset.  

Media.  She has a jewish daughter.  The media or rags as you call them is an extension of gov in USA and now the world since we allow them into our discussion.  as we attempt our own brexit2.0 in USA here which is the threads discussion I though your original post was brexit related.  Hill is crypto jew bet on it.  How else the jewish daughter?  So that is why I thought it worth mentioning that a rag was fronting the establishment lie just like was attempted in your recent brexit with your media and online gov polls that got busted in the 11th hour.  My post is that bust for the USA!  I am sure if the 88% of the voters get it through in spite of the vote irregularities being reported in every precinct in usa that it will also be a hard victory to hold on to for the same reason you are mentioning here in the thread for the UK.  Our supreme cout is half jewish though they are 2 % of population.  And maybe the remaining other half has some crypto's in them ..that was my earlier point.  So there is a tie in since the concern stems from the same group havin a choke hold on the processes of all the nation states of the planet right now.  In fact they are now solidifying control of the processes at the local level so be warned.  If this groups is moving into these lessor goals it is either out of fear or because they have guarontees of a pres victory or some mixture of both..


Title: Re: High Court ruling on Brexit
Post by: popcorn1 on November 07, 2016, 07:37:26 AM
Not sure what the Clinton pic has to do with the rest of the thread, so I'll try to adjust the course of the conversation back to Blighty, as it were.  As I've been stating recently in other threads (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1637427.msg16467234#msg16467234), the UK is, in many ways, undeniably taking a swing towards hardline fascism and people should be seriously concerned by that.  In the case of this particular ruling, certain disgusting gutter rags that people, for reasons beyond my comprehension, often mislabel as "newspapers", appear to be drawing inspiration from sources that no one should ever dare draw inspiration from:

https://scontent-lhr3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/14947878_1828646354071258_4184568159696365957_n.jpg?oh=0fb259970d8bd0ad8d7f96405d12556b&oe=58979E0F

The direct translation of 'Volksverräter' technically means 'traitors of the people', but the comparison is close enough to be relevant.  Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.  Stop regressing to such a primitive and archaic mindset.  
They are enemy of the people ;D..
Point 1..How can we discuss how we are going to leave the EU until we trigger article 50..
We cannot discuss business until it's been triggered..

And the point i don't get is we voted out?..
So does the remoaner's think that if it's a bad deal that they don't like we will still be in the EU
and we wont leave?..
WE VOTED OUT?..So no matter what the deal is we are out..GONE BYE..
We as people voted to leave the EU..SO WE LEAVE ;)..

Now why didn't the law step in before the referendum happened if something was so wrong?..
parliament give the people the vote to stay or leave the EU..
Now because they didn't get the result they wanted it's another vote >:(..

People say well we get a say so how we leave?..
Brexit wants no free movement of people..
Now the Eu knows this So how do we get over this snag who will give in?..
Now if they come back with a bad deal and we still have free movement of people..
UKIP will win the next election 100%..And if they drag it on UKIP will win the next election..

And if Ukip wins will it be better for immigrants then?..

Until we trigger article 50 we cannot discuss business..
When we trigger article 50 parliament then can discuss business only till we trigger it..
So what was with the stalling?..We have no say until we trigger article 50..

We need to trigger ARTICLE 50 to even speak business with the EU..
Then parliament has a say DIP SHITS the dip shits are the remoaners ;)..

just come on the news Ryanair said they had to lower prices bad for share holders good for consumers ..But business is booming because cheaper flights  ;)..

Been saying it all along it will get cheaper if we leave ..
Most of all this shit is because businesses are trying to keep there rich share holders in profit
instead of thinking of the consumers..
They are so stupid they would rather make 100 pounds off 1 million people instead of making 20p
off 5 billion people..
Cheaper the goods the more will buy..
make less profits and more people will buy giving you more profits ;)..And it keeps people in jobs ;D..Yes i know some businesses have to make as much on 1 item because only a few ether need it or can afford it..But most businesses work on the masses owning..

Like food sell cheap more buy..
A Yacht not many will buy so you need to make as much as you can..

But the poor need cheap stuff so they can afford to save up for Christmas so they can give there children something at Christmas..It's so sad when parents cannot afford to give a child a good Christmas because the bills they pay are way over charged..
Rent food electric gas and water..What the poor need before they even buy clothes for there children..
Walker crisp saying they need to put prices up :D..
No stop paying gary millions to do these stupid ads :D..Then you can save money :D..
But point being is someone will come along and make a cheaper packet of crisp just as nice but cheaper ;)..
Bringing back the competition the EU was stopping the competition for cheaper goods
just what the poor needs..The RICH SHARE HOLDERS and the mangers in all businesses have been getting away with wages that pay way more than the workers..

When we leave the EU let the competitions begin ;)..Who can sell the cheapest goods on our markets..Good for all the masses..Only the few are super rich money no object..







Title: Re: Jews on UK High Court Attempting to Cockblock Brexit
Post by: popcorn1 on November 07, 2016, 08:24:29 AM
WE VOTED OUT SO WE ARE OUT ;D..Democracy is at stake..
I wonder if the judges got paid?..So much fiddling going on who knows  ;D..


Title: Re: Jews on UK High Court Attempting to Cockblock Brexit
Post by: Masha Sha on November 07, 2016, 08:31:51 AM
• The legal bid appears to have been initiated by Alex Chesterman, a Jewish businessman.
• The bid was delegated to the law firm Mischon de Reya, founded by a Jewish lawyer, and that has retained a strong synthesis between its work and that of Jewish interests.
• The legal bid has been led by a Jewish lawyer, David Pannick, QC.
• In an effort to obscure the staffing and clientele behind the bid, David Pannick approached the Royal Courts of Justice to obtain masking measures for the bid. This measure was granted by Lord Justice Sir Brian Leveson, also Jewish.
• Finally, the legal bid was accepted by three judges at the High Court, two of whom, Terence Etherton and Philip Sales, are Jewish.
Jews are thought to comprise around 0.5% of the British population, and in light of this statistic the demonstrable prominence of Jews in the legal challenge against Brexit must be seen as nothing less than remarkable

Thank you for your informative work!!!

• The legal bid appears to have been initiated by Alex Chesterman, a Jewish businessman.
• The bid was delegated to the law firm Mischon de Reya, founded by a Jewish lawyer, and that has retained a strong synthesis between its work and that of Jewish interests.
• The legal bid has been led by a Jewish lawyer, David Pannick, QC.
• In an effort to obscure the staffing and clientele behind the bid, David Pannick approached the Royal Courts of Justice to obtain masking measures for the bid. This measure was granted by Lord Justice Sir Brian Leveson, also Jewish.
• Finally, the legal bid was accepted by three judges at the High Court, two of whom, Terence Etherton and Philip Sales, are Jewish.
Jews are thought to comprise around 0.5% of the British population, and in light of this statistic the demonstrable prominence of Jews in the legal challenge against Brexit must be seen as nothing less than remarkable

The Jews are still having a huge influence in the Western nations, although they have been driven away from the Eastern European nations such as Russia, Poland, and Romania. Look at the American presidential elections. Despite constituting for just 1.5% of the total population, more than half of the donations for Hitlery has come from the Jews.

Don't forget Japan... I dare anyone to speak about chosen people to the emperor of Japan... ahaha


Title: Re: Jews on UK High Court Attempting to Cockblock Brexit
Post by: Masha Sha on November 07, 2016, 09:57:45 AM
The Jews are still having a huge influence in the Western nations, although they have been driven away from the Eastern European nations such as Russia, Poland, and Romania. Look at the American presidential elections. Despite constituting for just 1.5% of the total population, more than half of the donations for Hitlery has come from the Jews.
yes i made a topic about that and got called antisemitic despite providing the proof which was of course ignored, they have recreated the same corruption in america and west european countries that led to their destruction 70-80 years ago, either they aren't aware of it or they think their money and influence will save them

what's interesting about the american election is that trump gets hardly any support from jewish donors despite being friendly with israel and having jewish family members, they know they can't use him to flood america with third wold immigrants and carry on their wars and that's what matters most to them

A little add on to your post:

http://libertyblitzkrieg.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Screen-Shot-2016-11-05-at-12.31.00-PM-1024x691.jpg


Title: Re: High Court ruling on Brexit
Post by: DooMAD on November 07, 2016, 02:41:27 PM
Point 1..How can we discuss how we are going to leave the EU until we trigger article 50..
We cannot discuss business until it's been triggered..

And the point i don't get is we voted out?..
So does the remoaner's think that if it's a bad deal that they don't like we will still be in the EU
and we wont leave?..
WE VOTED OUT?..So no matter what the deal is we are out..GONE BYE..
We as people voted to leave the EU..SO WE LEAVE ;)..

Now why didn't the law step in before the referendum happened if something was so wrong?..
parliament give the people the vote to stay or leave the EU..
Now because they didn't get the result they wanted it's another vote >:(..

People say well we get a say so how we leave?..
Brexit wants no free movement of people..
Now the Eu knows this So how do we get over this snag who will give in?..
Now if they come back with a bad deal and we still have free movement of people..
UKIP will win the next election 100%..And if they drag it on UKIP will win the next election..

And if Ukip wins will it be better for immigrants then?..

Until we trigger article 50 we cannot discuss business..
When we trigger article 50 parliament then can discuss business only till we trigger it..
So what was with the stalling?..We have no say until we trigger article 50..

We need to trigger ARTICLE 50 to even speak business with the EU..

It might be your view that Brexit means no free movement of people, but the referendum wasn't exactly clear on that.  Many of the Leave proponents were campaigning on a "have their cake and eat it" platform, where they said we could stop free movement of people and still have access to the free market.  Clearly that's not going to fly.  If that's the kind of negotiating stance you think we should attempt when we trigger article 50, we're definitely not going to get a good deal.  If we're not having free market access, we need to decide what type of tariffs we could agree to.  And so on.

It's not as simple as shouting "we're out" over and over.  The debate in parliament is crucial to ensure we're at least somewhat united on what type deal we're aiming for *before* we even start negotiating.  Do you think we should just trust the PM to wing it?  Make some shit up and hope for the best?  Theresa Mayhem should not have the final say (and I'd be surprised if you wanted her to, as she campaigned to Remain) on what that deal should be.  Plus the public have a right to know what it is we've agreed to.  This shouldn't be one individual acting behind closed doors.  Again, we're going to leave, but we need to be smart and transparent about it, deciding how best to leave with the least amount of collateral damage.


Title: Re: Jews on UK High Court Attempting to Cockblock Brexit
Post by: gentlemand on November 07, 2016, 03:14:51 PM
I dunno about cockblocking, but I cannae believe how woolly the entire process has been and it's something that needs hardened clarification. This court thingy moves towards that.

People didn't vote for a secretive inner circle to have carte blanche over an entire country. They voted for Brexit. It's parliament's right and job to decide what form that takes. People voted for that too.


Title: Re: High Court ruling on Brexit
Post by: popcorn1 on November 07, 2016, 03:27:49 PM
Point 1..How can we discuss how we are going to leave the EU until we trigger article 50..
We cannot discuss business until it's been triggered..

And the point i don't get is we voted out?..
So does the remoaner's think that if it's a bad deal that they don't like we will still be in the EU
and we wont leave?..
WE VOTED OUT?..So no matter what the deal is we are out..GONE BYE..
We as people voted to leave the EU..SO WE LEAVE ;)..

Now why didn't the law step in before the referendum happened if something was so wrong?..
parliament give the people the vote to stay or leave the EU..
Now because they didn't get the result they wanted it's another vote >:(..

People say well we get a say so how we leave?..
Brexit wants no free movement of people..
Now the Eu knows this So how do we get over this snag who will give in?..
Now if they come back with a bad deal and we still have free movement of people..
UKIP will win the next election 100%..And if they drag it on UKIP will win the next election..

And if Ukip wins will it be better for immigrants then?..

Until we trigger article 50 we cannot discuss business..
When we trigger article 50 parliament then can discuss business only till we trigger it..
So what was with the stalling?..We have no say until we trigger article 50..

We need to trigger ARTICLE 50 to even speak business with the EU..

It might be your view that Brexit means no free movement of people, but the referendum wasn't exactly clear on that.  Many of the Leave proponents were campaigning on a "have their cake and eat it" platform, where they said we could stop free movement of people and still have access to the free market.  Clearly that's not going to fly.  If that's the kind of negotiating stance you think we should attempt when we trigger article 50, we're definitely not going to get a good deal.  If we're not having free market access, we need to decide what type of tariffs we could agree to.  And so on.

It's not as simple as shouting "we're out" over and over.  The debate in parliament is crucial to ensure we're at least somewhat united on what type deal we're aiming for *before* we even start negotiating.  Do you think we should just trust the PM to wing it?  Make some shit up and hope for the best?  Theresa Mayhem should not have the final say (and I'd be surprised if you wanted her to, as she campaigned to Remain) on what that deal should be.  Plus the public have a right to know what it is we've agreed to.  This shouldn't be one individual acting behind closed doors.  Again, we're going to leave, but we need to be smart and transparent about it, deciding how best to leave with the least amount of collateral damage.
No but what you don't realise is ..What do we discuss until article 50 as been triggered?..

The EU will listen to what parliament is saying then say no to the terms we propose?..
Because before article 50 is even triggered you have told the EU what we want?..
So they are going to refuse ..So will article 50 be even triggered?..

WE KNOW WHAT YOU REMOANERS ARE TRYING TO DO..STALL ..SO STUPID..

Parliament voted 6 to1 to give the people the vote to leave the EU?..
So we voted to leave?..
Now we cannot discuss how we leave until article 50 as been triggered ?..
The EU needs us to trigger article 50 to discuss business..
SO HOW THE HELL DO WE KNOW WHAT TO DISCUSS UNTIL WE TRIGGER ARTICLE 50?..

We could spend 1 year discussing how we leave YES?..
So after a year of discussions we trigger article 50 YES?..
Now after a year of discussions what if the EU disagrees?..It's been a waste of time..

Now if we trigger article 50 then we have 2 years to leave the EU to discuss properly how we leave between 2 parties knowing what each other wants?..

Don't trigger article 50 then how do we discuss leaving?..

Now once we trigger article 50 it goes back to parliament how we leave..
But what ever the out come the British people voted to leave so we must leave..

How we leave?..Well we wont know nothing until we trigger article 50 because there is no discussions because the EU needs article 50 triggered before they will speak..

THE REMOANERS ARE DESTROYING OUR NATION ..Now BUZZ OFF :D :D..




Title: Re: High Court ruling on Brexit
Post by: DooMAD on November 08, 2016, 10:40:25 AM
No but what you don't realise is ..What do we discuss until article 50 as been triggered?..

The EU will listen to what parliament is saying then say no to the terms we propose?..
Because before article 50 is even triggered you have told the EU what we want?..
So they are going to refuse ..So will article 50 be even triggered?..

WE KNOW WHAT YOU REMOANERS ARE TRYING TO DO..STALL ..SO STUPID..

Parliament voted 6 to1 to give the people the vote to leave the EU?..
So we voted to leave?..
Now we cannot discuss how we leave until article 50 as been triggered ?..
The EU needs us to trigger article 50 to discuss business..
SO HOW THE HELL DO WE KNOW WHAT TO DISCUSS UNTIL WE TRIGGER ARTICLE 50?..

Just in case you're one of those people who thought the sole purpose of Europe was to lecture us on bendy bananas, it's important to note that there were a few other benefits (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptfmAY6M6aA).  One obvious and rather important thing that needs to be discussed is what this supposed "British Bill of Rights" is going to look like if we do withdraw from the ECHR as well.  You have to remember that anything that isn't protected under EU law tends to be cut under the tories (http://www.politics.co.uk/comment-analysis/2016/06/10/legal-aid-cuts-have-ripped-the-heart-out-of-our-justice-syst).  People are already raising concerns that workers rights (http://strongerunions.org/2016/02/25/10-workers-rights-brexit-would-risk/) could come under threat, since the tories have never expressed much of an interest in protecting those (and when the topic does arise, it just sounds like they're paying lip service).  Incidentally, #9 in that list "is particularly relevant because foreign firms can now get knock-down price bargains on British companies because of the newly weak value of the Pound (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-workers-rights-take-over-firms-a7403051.html)".  It would be naive to trust this government, with a proven track record of placing the rights of billionaires (those elites you claim you don't like) above the average person, with the task of deciding what our rights will be post brexit.

So yeah, what could we possibly discuss until we trigger article 50?   ::)

Just remember, when they start taking your rights away so they can give more tax cuts to the wealthy, you're getting exactly what you voted for.


Title: Re: High Court ruling on Brexit
Post by: popcorn1 on November 08, 2016, 11:00:53 AM
No but what you don't realise is ..What do we discuss until article 50 as been triggered?..

The EU will listen to what parliament is saying then say no to the terms we propose?..
Because before article 50 is even triggered you have told the EU what we want?..
So they are going to refuse ..So will article 50 be even triggered?..

WE KNOW WHAT YOU REMOANERS ARE TRYING TO DO..STALL ..SO STUPID..

Parliament voted 6 to1 to give the people the vote to leave the EU?..
So we voted to leave?..
Now we cannot discuss how we leave until article 50 as been triggered ?..
The EU needs us to trigger article 50 to discuss business..
SO HOW THE HELL DO WE KNOW WHAT TO DISCUSS UNTIL WE TRIGGER ARTICLE 50?..

Just in case you're one of those people who thought the sole purpose of Europe was to lecture us on bendy bananas, it's important to note that there were a few other benefits (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptfmAY6M6aA).  One obvious and rather important thing that needs to be discussed is what this supposed "British Bill of Rights" is going to look like if we do withdraw from the ECHR as well.  You have to remember that anything that isn't protected under EU law tends to be cut under the tories (http://www.politics.co.uk/comment-analysis/2016/06/10/legal-aid-cuts-have-ripped-the-heart-out-of-our-justice-syst).  People are already raising concerns that workers rights (http://strongerunions.org/2016/02/25/10-workers-rights-brexit-would-risk/) could come under threat, since the tories have never expressed much of an interest in protecting those (and when the topic does arise, it just sounds like they're paying lip service).  Incidentally, #9 in that list "is particularly relevant because foreign firms can now get knock-down price bargains on British companies because of the newly weak value of the Pound (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-workers-rights-take-over-firms-a7403051.html)".  It would be naive to trust this government, with a proven track record of placing the rights of billionaires (those elites you claim you don't like) above the average person, with the task of deciding what our rights will be post brexit.

So yeah, what could we possibly discuss until we trigger article 50?   ::)

Just remember, when they start taking your rights away so they can give more tax cuts to the wealthy, you're getting exactly what you voted for.
And you could be right sir..BUT 4 years later there GONE ;)..Not with the EU..
In the 21st century it's the people who now have sovereign..WE RULE..
Now because the age of the internet it's very hard to hide things from the people ;)..
And it's gone so much easier to gather people ;)..Angry people fighting for every ones rights..

But 4 years later there gone ;D..EU we don't know who they are and no one voted for them to work for the people..THEY WORK FOR THEMSELVES  ;)..

And Nick cleg is a PEG :D..Hope he gets run over by a bus it would make my year..
Lied to the young adults over uni fees..SHAME ON HIM..Who would trust a SHIT like that ;D..

Always been a die hard labour man BUT Mrs may does the right thing then i will support her..
Does the wrong thing and she is gone ;)..BUT she already knows this..
She got to keep the poor and rich happy some how..
So i wait to see what she does before i give my vote..if she is all for the poor it's no good if she is all for the rich then that's no good..In the middle women i am happy..


Title: Re: High Court ruling on Brexit
Post by: dirokkl on November 08, 2016, 11:29:07 AM
It's rather unnerving to see that those in the general public who voted for Brexit in the name of "taking back control" from the European parliament and restoring the sovereignty of the UK parliament are now so furious about our parliament being allowed to have a say.  That's what you voted for, isn't it?  Or did none of you actually have the faintest clue what you were voting for aside from "boo, foreigners".   ::)
parliament already had its say when it voted to hold the referendum
I do think that such referendums should take place. The people in the mass do not understand politics and Economics. Time held such a referendum it means someone needed it.