Jews on UK High Court Attempting to Cockblock Brexit

[saddampbuh]

Earlier today, three drag queens on the pretentious UK High Court managed to sabotage the will of the British people yet again.

The phenomenon of judicial tyranny has become a contemporary staple in Anglo-Saxon plutocracies. The decision making power of the ballot has become nothing more than a novelty governments ignore when votes are inconvenient, whether it’s Proposition 8 in California, or now Brexit. Many communist countries during the Cold War had similar symbolic plebiscites and elections, but at least the 1970’s-80’s USSR wasn’t trying to exterminate its native people unlike the current dying Atlanticist powers.

The Supreme Court of the United States is known to be almost half Jewish, the United Kingdom is no different. Here are the three individuals electing themselves arbitrators of British destiny.

http://www.dailystormer.com/uk-high-court-blocks-brexit/

[Masha Sha]

I don't see in what would the judeo-ethno-democratic-socialist-nationalist supremacists have an interest in one way or the others. Your judgement is clouded I guess.

However the term drag queens made laugh... then it the control of institution by the judeo-ethno-democratic-socialistnatrionalist is quite impressive, it's statistically a problem.

Would be curious to read the interpretation of those data point by Watson... however he may end up like TayAI if he doesn't repeat the party line.... however one day one AI will learn to LIE .

How could they know...

[DooMAD]

Disregarding the OP and thread title entirely, for the sake of balance and sanity, there's a less absurd article here:

http://www.economist.com/news/britain/21709589-high-court-rules-parliament-must-vote-trigger-brexit-process-taking-back-control

At this point, It's highly unlikely that anyone in parliament could successfully block Britain triggering article 50 and leaving the EU.  What having a parliamentary debate about it should hopefully accomplish is to ensure we have an actual plan (something I find highly doubtful at present) and conduct this quite significant break-up in an intelligent way, causing as little damage as possible.  Screw prime minister Mayhem and her (blow)hard Brexit drivel.

It's rather unnerving to see that those in the general public who voted for Brexit in the name of "taking back control" from the European parliament and restoring the sovereignty of the UK parliament are now so furious about our parliament being allowed to have a say.  That's what you voted for, isn't it?  Or did none of you actually have the faintest clue what you were voting for aside from "boo, foreigners".  

[Morbid]

zionists would be a better term for this context..

[saddampbuh]

It's rather unnerving to see that those in the general public who voted for Brexit in the name of "taking back control" from the European parliament and restoring the sovereignty of the UK parliament are now so furious about our parliament being allowed to have a say.  That's what you voted for, isn't it?  Or did none of you actually have the faintest clue what you were voting for aside from "boo, foreigners".  

parliament already had its say when it voted to hold the referendum

[DooMAD]

It's rather unnerving to see that those in the general public who voted for Brexit in the name of "taking back control" from the European parliament and restoring the sovereignty of the UK parliament are now so furious about our parliament being allowed to have a say.  That's what you voted for, isn't it?  Or did none of you actually have the faintest clue what you were voting for aside from "boo, foreigners".  

parliament already had its say when it voted to hold the referendum

Yes, and now that we've had the referendum, we need to decide how best to leave.  No one endorsed a particular Brexit strategy in the referendum.  Instead, the public gave a general verdict of "out".  The end outcome will still be honoured, but the method is yet to be defined.  That's what needs to be debated.  We need to try and make a success of it. 

Those whining about this high court verdict would apparently quite happily embrace a grossly authoritarian political culture and abandon the rule of law if it suited their agenda.  The pathetic outcry over this quite sensible judgement is a damning indictment of the unhinged mentality of hardliners.  Feel free to hastily cut off your own nose to spite your face, but the rest of us would prefer a little more caution and sense.

[Sithara007]

I don't think that anyone will be able to block the Brexit, as the majority of the Brits have voted for it. The European Union itself is a failed concept. Unless Merkel changes her dictatorial tone, we are going to see many more countries seceding from the EU.

[popcorn1]

Moody and bond rating[edit]
Moody's was later merged into Dun & Bradstreet, only to again become an independent corporation in October 2000. Moody's status is reflected in Thomas Friedman's 1996 comment: that

There are two superpowers in the world today in my opinion. There's the United States and there's Moody's Bond Rating Service. The United States can destroy you by dropping bombs, and Moody's can destroy you by downgrading your bonds. And believe me, it's not clear sometimes who's more powerful. (February 13, 1996 interview with Jim Lehrer)..Best friends with CITI BANK ..

The threats to lower Britain's credit rating if we leave ..

Moody's Analytics election model predicts Clinton win
AOL News‎ - 3 days ago
Nov 1 (Reuters) - Low gas prices and President Barack Obama's high approval ratings are .

Now we all know the election is rigged..TRUMP as way more supporters than HILLARY..

Moody's predicts anything that suits their agenda..Example..If they make the money ..

The USA and the UK are the same people running the money..Making there family friends money no one else ..The rest of us are slaves..

It's time to change politics were politicians have no way of fiddling the system ..

One rule that must change is no politician can have a family member in power for 150 years..
Meaning if i was the president then no one in my family can become a president for 150 years..

Just look at America it's the same people in power if it's not me brother it's me uncle if it's not me uncle it's me cousin if it's not me cousin it's me best friend..
Meaning the power is the same people telling us what and how we should live our lives..
When it's the people that should be telling them what to do..

Just showing people why i wanted out the same people in business are running my life..
IT'S NOT DEMOCRACY ..IT'S LINING THE SUPER RICH POCKETS..

They are destroying the planet for there greed ..They are blind to what they are doing because of the money..MONEY MONEY MONEY IT MAKES PEOPLE FUNNY..

You people need to know what happens when low or high taxes get paid to governments..
Take to much tax people flee..Take to less tax and your people suffer..
I.E bad roads schools criminal activity rises..

[popcorn1]

It's rather unnerving to see that those in the general public who voted for Brexit in the name of "taking back control" from the European parliament and restoring the sovereignty of the UK parliament are now so furious about our parliament being allowed to have a say.  That's what you voted for, isn't it?  Or did none of you actually have the faintest clue what you were voting for aside from "boo, foreigners".  

parliament already had its say when it voted to hold the referendum

Yes, and now that we've had the referendum, we need to decide how best to leave.  No one endorsed a particular Brexit strategy in the referendum.  Instead, the public gave a general verdict of "out".  The end outcome will still be honoured, but the method is yet to be defined.  That's what needs to be debated.  We need to try and make a success of it. 

Those whining about this high court verdict would apparently quite happily embrace a grossly authoritarian political culture and abandon the rule of law if it suited their agenda.  The pathetic outcry over this quite sensible judgement is a damning indictment of the unhinged mentality of hardliners.  Feel free to hastily cut off your own nose to spite your face, but the rest of us would prefer a little more caution and sense.

Remoners what don't you get about the meaning of Brexit?..

Brexit to me was no free movement of people and to change the elite businesses that are paying our politicians backhanders to do what they want..

I wanted to prove to businesses out there that if you leave we can make what you do and sell to our people your product..We make it our selves and sell it to our selves..

And the person who just set this new company up must now pay his or her proper taxes
And if you leave for cheaper labour then you will not sell your product on our markets..

It makes me angry knowing a company can hold a country to ransom ..
If i was in power i would make you pay your way ..

If your making billions and your ripping the tax system off you should be in jail..
GREEDY FUCKERS ..
Anyone with 50 million and wants to rip the public with more taxes should be shot ..
GREEDY FUCKERS..
I always say if you made enough give someone else a chance..
But what is enough to some people..

Obama borrowed double the debt you already had in all of history..Meaning he robbed loads and so did all his CRONIES..

Then our soldiers police secret agents all put there lives in danger to line the politicians and big businesses pockets..So war is to line someones pockets not because your country is in danger but to line someones pockets..Yes there is threats but most are to line someones pockets..
So your used as a pawn to make there lives better not yours but there lives only..
Human cannon fodder..

Now because we don't want free movement of people in the EU ..The Eu said no free trade?..
MEANING WE ARE FULLY OUT..But when we say we are leaving what does leaving mean..
IT MEANS WE ARE FUCKING OUT >:(GONE BYE..

Now you already know that we brexit people want no free movement of people?
And you already know that the EU as said they want free movement or no free trade?..

So what more do you need to know we are OUT?..So what say as anyone got?..NONE..
You remoaners just wont let go..
We want out we don't care if the EU does no trade if they be funny yes we MIGHT and i say MIGHT suffer but we are ready to deal with it because we British can do ANYTHING..
We are way to smart to crumble..

Just look at ICELAND 350k people doing better than the uk Not in the EU..

The deal the Eu done with CANADA do they get to have free movement of EU citizens in Canada?.
So anyone from the EU can live and get a home for free in Canada like they can in the UK..

No well that's not right..Why should we have free movement and pay 10 billion to the EU
But Canada pays nothing and has no free movement..

If we don't leave now we will be the laughing stock of the world..
The usa france will look at Britain as shitbags..The leaders will be happy because they are lining there own pockets but the people will look at us like SHIT ..

Please mrs may trigger our new better bright future in march..
We then got 2 years to discuss business..

I am not European i am British..If anything the EU made me do more hours in work from 39 to 42 hour a week..Not that i am bothered.. But i am that someone made me work more hours instead of asking me too..

MOST OF YOU POLITICIANS ARE SCUM BAG THIEVES  ..

When will a leader ever go to jail to make an example to the next leader that
NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW NO ONE.. NOT EVEN THE LAW IS ABOVE THE LAW..
The law is set by the people for the people and no one shall be above it NO ONE.

And yes our governments could be bad but at least most people can get to London most will never be able to get to Belgium to complain..
And we can change who we want telling us what to do every 4 or 5 years not with the EU..

So to all you reamoners WE ARE OUT what does out mean?..Meaning we are gone ..
We have NATO and the UN for war..So our countries can act together..
So why the need for the EU?..

The whole world will want to live in the uk if we let free movement of people..
Over run system..And the super rich wont even live here to feel it..
BUT they will be enjoying the money..

[Bitbobb]

GURANTEED: The "Elite" will be murdering babies and children tonight (especially) and tomorrow night to gain favors with the dark forces before the USA election. This is not a joke.  It is NOT a ruse or "conspiracy story". There is a well known testimony by Viki Polin that was done on Oprah that you can still find on Youtube where she talks about it also. The murders will happen at midnight on the East coast, and at midnight in each time zone up until approximately 2AM in each time zone.

TO HAVE A SHOT AT PREVENTING THE ELECTION FROM BEING STOLEN BY DARK FORCES, WHICH ARE BUILDING POWER TONIGHT (ESPECIALLY) BY MURDERING CHILDREN, WE NEED TO PRAY THROUGH THEIR CEREMONIES TO CANCEL THEIR BENEFIT AND I AM NOT JOKING.
If you have not prayed for years but believe in God, now would be a great time to pray again. It will not take many people focusing on the topic to wreck their ceremonies, the people that hit this web site will probably be enough. What would I pray for and what would I say?

1. Dear God, we did not ask for this filthy corrupted government that is turning America into a filthy and corrupted nation, they got into power via deception. Please return our freedom from tyranny and do not let their evil works benefit them tonight or any other night. Please let America return to a righteous leadership that has respect for the individual who believes in Godly principle.

2. Dear God, please bless the souls of those who will be murdered for the purpose of turning this nation to final darkness and be there, at every ceremony where these children will be murdered. Please take their souls and comfort them, so Satan receives NOTHING. Please "sour" their ceremonies with holiness and render their effects neutral.

3. Dear God, Please bring America to righteous status as a righteous world leader by stopping those who have worked so hard to wreck America's morality, and by stopping those who have used this great nation to spread disaster via war around the globe. Please do not let the election be stolen and instead, put into power those who will bring America away from the edge of final spiritual darkness. Please give the American people what they have asked for, and bring America back into the light.

If you can think of anything else to say, SAY IT. We need huge numbers doing this. Focus on this for a long period of time, especially at midnight in your area and if you are not in a U.S. time zone, pick a time in the U.S. that corresponds with midnight in either Eastern or Pacific time, because that is when a majority of the satanic activities will be happening. If we can muster enough power it will beyond a doubt have a significant impact on everyone's future.

[popcorn1]

It's all about the money ..Man to make your life very good is what money does?..
It's all about the money END OF STORY..
Then what happens i could imagine is the power gets to their heads then i could imagine humans could get together like a gang and have there rituals and codes of conducts like sacrifice..
You might get some nut cases thinking like this because of the power..
The way humans can think is fucking crazy sometimes..Religion to name one..

BUT IT'S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY..THE MONEY IS THE POWER..
THE GOLD.. THE LAND.. THE OIL ..THE DRUGS ..THE LOANS.. THE GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS..
ALL POWER..

Things have got to change..Same old system I.E people for the last 150 years..
They are making there children's children's lives better but not your children and your future children..They are creating slaves to debt for the BANKERS

[Masha Sha]

Skimming quickly I don't think the term Zionist isn't appropriated. It lacks the ethnic component (sanyanims and others non "tribes" members of the "Zionist" movement).

Then it's really important to recognize that a vast majority of the "tribe" is not even aware of those. And anyway this all agenda centered around Jerusalem and isreal becomes totally insignifiant in the face of the mass of China and Russia resistance.

But yes I find ironic too that freedom of movement isn't included. However I am not sure the situation in Canada is really better than in the us and that it would be a safe propositions.

Edit: yep, freeing the captives would be even greater than praying for them...

[saddampbuh]

Yes, and now that we've had the referendum, we need to decide how best to leave.  No one endorsed a particular Brexit strategy in the referendum.  Instead, the public gave a general verdict of "out".  The end outcome will still be honoured, but the method is yet to be defined.  That's what needs to be debated.  We need to try and make a success of it. 

Those whining about this high court verdict would apparently quite happily embrace a grossly authoritarian political culture and abandon the rule of law if it suited their agenda.  The pathetic outcry over this quite sensible judgement is a damning indictment of the unhinged mentality of hardliners.  Feel free to hastily cut off your own nose to spite your face, but the rest of us would prefer a little more caution and sense.

i dont think you understand how this works. the eu wont hold formal negotiations with us until we officially tell them we're leaving by invoking article 50. this has to be done before any replacement treaty can be put before parliament because until we invoke article 50 and begin the process of leaving there isn't going to be one on the table. the only method of leaving the eu is triggering article 50 as both sides told us during the referendum campaign. this verdict prevents the pm from doing that. its not about seeking parliament's consent for whatever we end up signing with the eu once we leave but on the act of leaving itself. parliament wants a veto over the referendum it voted to authorise because it doesn't like the result and the jews have given it one.

and fuck parliament and parliamentary democracy in general. its not as if it is ever representative of the people who elect it. ukip 3.9 million votes and 1 seat snp marxists 1 million votes and 50 seats. 52% of the country wanting to leave the eu and 80% of mps wanting to stay. 3 "major parties" which for some reason still includes the lib dems which get fewer votes than ukip conspiring to enshrine into law the giving away of 0.7% of our gdp in aid when polls show that 80% of people don't want it happening. a dictatorship would be far more in keeping with the popular mood.

[Masha Sha]

Yes, and now that we've had the referendum, we need to decide how best to leave.  No one endorsed a particular Brexit strategy in the referendum.  Instead, the public gave a general verdict of "out".  The end outcome will still be honoured, but the method is yet to be defined.  That's what needs to be debated.  We need to try and make a success of it. 

Those whining about this high court verdict would apparently quite happily embrace a grossly authoritarian political culture and abandon the rule of law if it suited their agenda.  The pathetic outcry over this quite sensible judgement is a damning indictment of the unhinged mentality of hardliners.  Feel free to hastily cut off your own nose to spite your face, but the rest of us would prefer a little more caution and sense.

i dont think you understand how this works. the eu wont hold formal negotiations with us until we officially tell them we're leaving by invoking article 50. this has to be done before any replacement treaty can be put before parliament because until we invoke article 50 and begin the process of leaving there isn't going to be one on the table. the only method of leaving the eu is triggering article 50 as both sides told us during the referendum campaign. this verdict prevents the pm from doing that. its not about seeking parliament's consent for whatever we end up signing with the eu once we leave but on the act of leaving itself. parliament wants a veto over the referendum it voted to authorise because it doesn't like the result and the jews have given it one.

and fuck parliament and parliamentary democracy in general. its not as if it is ever representative of the people who elect it. ukip 3.9 million votes and 1 seat snp marxists 1 million votes and 50 seats. 52% of the country wanting to leave the eu and 80% of mps wanting to stay. 3 "major parties" which for some reason still includes the lib dems which get fewer votes than ukip conspiring to enshrine into law the giving away of 0.7% of our gdp in aid when polls show that 80% of people don't want it happening. a dictatorship would be far more in keeping with the popular mood.

LoL on your last remark... technically right now the USA is in a civil war, so you know brexit, what ever, once the American core of the conspiracy is defeated a lot of things will change, the only question will the United States of America need to be defeated to reach those targeted at the core?

[DooMAD]

Yes, and now that we've had the referendum, we need to decide how best to leave.  No one endorsed a particular Brexit strategy in the referendum.  Instead, the public gave a general verdict of "out".  The end outcome will still be honoured, but the method is yet to be defined.  That's what needs to be debated.  We need to try and make a success of it. 

Those whining about this high court verdict would apparently quite happily embrace a grossly authoritarian political culture and abandon the rule of law if it suited their agenda.  The pathetic outcry over this quite sensible judgement is a damning indictment of the unhinged mentality of hardliners.  Feel free to hastily cut off your own nose to spite your face, but the rest of us would prefer a little more caution and sense.

i dont think you understand how this works. the eu wont hold formal negotiations with us until we officially tell them we're leaving by invoking article 50. this has to be done before any replacement treaty can be put before parliament because until we invoke article 50 and begin the process of leaving there isn't going to be one on the table. the only method of leaving the eu is triggering article 50 as both sides told us during the referendum campaign. this verdict prevents the pm from doing that. its not about seeking parliament's consent for whatever we end up signing with the eu once we leave but on the act of leaving itself. parliament wants a veto over the referendum it voted to authorise because it doesn't like the result and the jews have given it one.

and fuck parliament and parliamentary democracy in general. its not as if it is ever representative of the people who elect it. ukip 3.9 million votes and 1 seat snp marxists 1 million votes and 50 seats. 52% of the country wanting to leave the eu and 80% of mps wanting to stay. 3 "major parties" which for some reason still includes the lib dems which get fewer votes than ukip conspiring to enshrine into law the giving away of 0.7% of our gdp in aid when polls show that 80% of people don't want it happening. a dictatorship would be far more in keeping with the popular mood.

No, this verdict doesn't prevent the PM from invoking article 50, it just prevents her from doing it in an incredibly stupid and arrogant way.  Again, the most likely outcome is that article 50 will still be triggered, but the debate will determine what we'll attempt to bargain for when we do.  If you're going to talk figures, then yes, 52% of the British public voted to leave the EU, but only 24% of the country voted Conservative.  So it follows that people didn’t vote for the terms of Brexit to be dictated by the Conservatives.  Also, no one, that's zero percent of the public, voted for Theresa Mayhem, so there's no way in hell she's calling all the shots.

[saddampbuh]

No, this verdict doesn't prevent the PM from invoking article 50, it just prevents her from doing it in an incredibly stupid and arrogant way.  Again, the most likely outcome is that article 50 will still be triggered, but the debate will determine what we'll attempt to bargain for when we do.

bremoaner spin. it does prevent her from invoking article 50 .

“The government does not have power under the crown’s prerogative to give notice pursuant to article 50 for the UK to withdraw from the European Union.”
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/nov/03/parliament-must-trigger-brexit-high-court-rules

this traitor is telling the government it has to go back to mps to get permission for something the last government already got permission for

agreed mps will probably go along with it but on the condition we carry on making payments and accepting all the eu's rules and judgements and the free movement of people. this is not a conspiracy theory but literally what the bremoaners like clegg have told us they are aiming for. mps will try and force us to stay in the eu in all but name with all the unwanted trappings of the single market.

If you're going to talk figures, then yes, 52% of the British public voted to leave the EU, but only 24% of the country voted Conservative.  So it follows that people didn’t vote for the terms of Brexit to be dictated by the Conservatives.  Also, no one, that's zero percent of the public, voted for Theresa Mayhem, so there's no way in hell she's calling all the shots.

if you add the ukip and dup vote to that of the tories there is slightly above 50% for brexit but its not all that important. if an election were held today the tories would win by 100 seats. the only reason may doesn't want to call one is corbyn will have to resign afterwards and she wants to keep him around as long as possible.

a truly representative parliament would have given us the tories in coalition with 80+ ukip mps, paving the way for genuine nationalism a couple of elections down the line. no wonder the traitorous establishment hates pr, referendums and anything else that expresses the popular will.

[saddampbuh]

• The legal bid appears to have been initiated by Alex Chesterman, a Jewish businessman.
• The bid was delegated to the law firm Mischon de Reya, founded by a Jewish lawyer, and that has retained a strong synthesis between its work and that of Jewish interests.
• The legal bid has been led by a Jewish lawyer, David Pannick, QC.
• In an effort to obscure the staffing and clientele behind the bid, David Pannick approached the Royal Courts of Justice to obtain masking measures for the bid. This measure was granted by Lord Justice Sir Brian Leveson, also Jewish.
• Finally, the legal bid was accepted by three judges at the High Court, two of whom, Terence Etherton and Philip Sales, are Jewish.
Jews are thought to comprise around 0.5% of the British population, and in light of this statistic the demonstrable prominence of Jews in the legal challenge against Brexit must be seen as nothing less than remarkable

[bryant.coleman]

• The legal bid appears to have been initiated by Alex Chesterman, a Jewish businessman.
• The bid was delegated to the law firm Mischon de Reya, founded by a Jewish lawyer, and that has retained a strong synthesis between its work and that of Jewish interests.
• The legal bid has been led by a Jewish lawyer, David Pannick, QC.
• In an effort to obscure the staffing and clientele behind the bid, David Pannick approached the Royal Courts of Justice to obtain masking measures for the bid. This measure was granted by Lord Justice Sir Brian Leveson, also Jewish.
• Finally, the legal bid was accepted by three judges at the High Court, two of whom, Terence Etherton and Philip Sales, are Jewish.
Jews are thought to comprise around 0.5% of the British population, and in light of this statistic the demonstrable prominence of Jews in the legal challenge against Brexit must be seen as nothing less than remarkable

The Jews are still having a huge influence in the Western nations, although they have been driven away from the Eastern European nations such as Russia, Poland, and Romania. Look at the American presidential elections. Despite constituting for just 1.5% of the total population, more than half of the donations for Hitlery has come from the Jews.

[saddampbuh]

The Jews are still having a huge influence in the Western nations, although they have been driven away from the Eastern European nations such as Russia, Poland, and Romania. Look at the American presidential elections. Despite constituting for just 1.5% of the total population, more than half of the donations for Hitlery has come from the Jews.

yes i made a topic about that and got called antisemitic despite providing the proof which was of course ignored, they have recreated the same corruption in america and west european countries that led to their destruction 70-80 years ago, either they aren't aware of it or they think their money and influence will save them

what's interesting about the american election is that trump gets hardly any support from jewish donors despite being friendly with israel and having jewish family members, they know they can't use him to flood america with third wold immigrants and carry on their wars and that's what matters most to them

[Daniel91]

I really think that you are to much paranoid here.
It seems that you see Jews everywhere.
UK high court made legal decision according to the law.
Religion or nationality of judges are irrelevant
UK government have choice to accept it or appeal the court's decision to the Supreme Court.
It's legal system in action, nothing strange or illegal here.
UK is not ''third world'' country but longest democracy in the world.