Bitcoin Forum

Signature stays within this forum, with varying elites of long year experience of blockchain technology while the world of the social media exposes projects to richer world of people who also looking for what to invest on. However, have not managed any campaign at both platform but like to know, to what advantage has signature campaign taken over social media or vice versa in recent campaigns.

If the campaign is related to bitcoin, then signature campaign over here in this forum is the best as there are thousands of users who know what is bitcoin and they can join your services. While if you permote it on Social media like facebook twitter, not everyone know about bitcoin, so maybe it wont be that much effective.

It is both effective to be honest. Doing signature campaign and Social media campaign are just contributing something on the success of a project of a certain coin(the Cryptocurrencies), but in different aspects and ways. In the Social media campaign like twitter and facebook, this way, people that have no idea about Cryptocurrencies would be inform that such thing exist, since most of the people right now only knows cash, while in the signature campaign the people that they are informing are those people knows cryptocurrencies and the ones that do social media campaigns.

Can't completely agree with that. If you know quite a few people on social media who are interested in bitcoin, that could help. You could also target specific audiences on social media, like Reddit. You could probably get some kinda sponsored message at a bitcoin-related subreddit. I think (correct me if I'm wrong) that a social media campaign would cost less. Depends, really.

Social media will bring more exposure in terms of advertisement of a product or thing due to the fact that there are already lots of users in the world of social media throughout the globe.

BUT the main thing here is the people's interest on that crypto related thing. If the product is all about crypto then this forum (bitcointalk) and other crypto related forum or even money making online websites are the best place to choose. No doubt that majority of people in the whole world are not interested in crypto so even it reached thousands of views it's not effective at all.

You may be banned from Reddit if you make paid posts.

Also in the social media there are too many fake profiles and media manipulation, I don't know how they affect the campaigns, but is something to take into account(one may say "here too", but in the social media they are really professionals)

Also not few bitcoiners are isolated, because we aren't that many, compared to the total population

The thing in signature campaigns here in forum is you have the target customers and investors if you are going to run a bitcoin / alt coin business.

But it can be also the same thing in social media as long as you are going to join bitcoin / alt coin related groups or pages.

You must need to do that first and have tons of bitcoin friends. And with signature campaign, people here in forum have the same interest and you don't have to look for them.

chronobank we all know had done such massive advertising and they saw that signature campaign works better than social media marketing campaign. i think this is because crypto is such as small community that is why they focus on signature campaign and articles only.

i think both is effective to be a way for promotions and we can reach more people. signature campaign is good for promotions into the community and social media campaign can spread the info for more people in outside. beside that, with social media, we have a list of many people that come from around the world and they are really new people.

I would assume most are to lazy or not paid enough to go through all friends to check if they are real or not. Even on the forum with signature, you will get bad quality posters and people won't look twice at the signatures anyway.

Twitter Audit help the campaign manager to verify if users are not bots. Most campaign manager don't accept users with their twitter audit results less than 80%.
Twitter and facebook campaign still are very effective in spreading the word about the company's existence.  For cryptocurrencies wanting to spread the word to the public not just to the users of bitcointalk, prefer to use social media as well.

BTC users also wants privacy and not subscribe to the newsletters from the developer team. Altcoin developers wants followers on the facebook and twitter because they want to update the users on these media.

i think signature campaign is more effective rather than social media campaign especially if you have bitcoin gambling sites or maybe new bitcoin exchange but indeed in terms of cost signature campaign will more expensive but i'm pretty sure all of members at here is bitcoiners and very interested about bitcoin project but for social media such as twitter or facebook i think not all of your followers or your friends will interested for project related cryptocurrency and if you success running signature campaign do not be surprise that your consumers will more much rather than promotions your sites using social media

for me both will be effective as we knew that in all aspects its needed exposure so if its into crypto most use signature campaign to informed most members and investors here about their project but if its not only about crypto social campaign indeed also to reach more people to get involved with certain project.

signature campaign still above and effective is compare social media campaign
if youre promote use signature campaign you can get market target in cryptco coin user and active use bitcoin and altcoin

Actually signature campaign is much more efficient than our estimation. Advetising here is a accurate targeting on bitcoin/altcoin investors, facebook and twitter have many fake bots, like you said, and some accounts are not bots maybe paid followers, still ineffective. I tried 200 people to retweeted mine, but got 0 result, social media campaign is wasting money.

Depend on what objective to achieve

If using sig campaign,

Advantage : Focusing and attract all people who interest on bitcoin in this forum
Disadvantage : Very narrow scope advertising ( just 1 forum )

If using social media

Advantage : it has wide scope that will attract more people world wide ( include forum ) as we already know, twitter and facebook still famous !
Disadvantage : expensive cost

I spend more than a month on this forum and during that period I went through every section of the forum and studied a almost all of the businesses and studied every rule of the forum. In my record I have found that a signature campaign is beneficial than a social media campaign. But it is compulsory that you hire an advertising manager who will give time to your advertising of your site and not a person who give all of your time to take over the forum moderation. It is recommended that you hire a person who care for effective advertising of your site. For moderation on this forum there are very intelligent moderators and they take care of the forum and whenever they feel that someone is avoiding the rules of the forum they deny them from the forum.

Both have an advantage and disadvantage. But use signature campaign on this forum is more efficient, because people here the true bitcoin/cryptocurrency market.

But there are bitcoin users too who not familiar or not get in to this forum, so using social media is good to attract such people.

In my opinion, signature campaign is more effective than social media campaign.
Using sig campaign platform, your audience is already into the crypto regime - meaning they have been using the cryptocurrency already or starting to learn the digital currency. So they are more eager to know about what you are advertising to them.
Whereas, social media campaign has advantages of reaching out to a larger community. However, very few will take the bait as either they are not knowledgeable enough or they are not keen on dealing with cryptocurrency.

Interested in crypto and have no account on this forum is just pure stupid imo, First time I needed an exchange yobit's signatures were all over the place so I clicked on one of them and created my account there even earned a few bucks in first 30 minutes :D.
Just check alexa rankings and see that more than a million people visit these forums daily and they need information thus going through pages and see all the sigs, if a service or company has the most advertisers better the exposure.

In twitter just try to post low quality comments or scam projects, you'll lose your followers or they wont look at your comments like before.

This forum is the mine of information for cryptocurrencies related stuff.

From what I have witnessed, I think that signature campaign is more effective because most of people from Bitcointalk have decent knowledge about Bitcoin. In social media, it is very hard to find someone who knows about cryptos so that it is kinda useless and waste of money. If I am a marketing manager, I will never ever make a social campaign about bitcoin-relate services.

Signature campaign is the most powerful because every one what is bitcoin and what are it's benefits, so people here in bitcointalk forum people will get an identity whether which ICO is running and what are present recent market going on. Where as through social media you will get an alerts from the people and as well as from the company but many people on social media till don't what are crypto currencies.

I think both can be as effective as each other.  Here in the forum you have exposure straight away to thousands of users already interested in this area, on social media it could bring in new people that are unaware or have only heard about bitcoin and the crypto world.

I think it has a lot to do with the user that is advertising especially via the likes of Twitter, if a user is heavily into bitcoin they may have hundreds or thousands of users crypto related vs a standard user that might only have a handful.

It would be interesting to see some stats.

Not really, there were some alt coins which it used signature campaign as the way their promotiing their coins, and the result is they didn't get their min target (Not many people invested) even though they already used signature campaign. Both of signature campaign nor social media campaign are the best way how to promotiong toother people, but the result still depends from how you will make people more "interested" with your project

Really few people here who are serious about altcoins and I am also one of them, therefore the signature campaign if it's related to bitcoin directly it can be much more effective than the social media campaign as in social media not all the users know what bitcoin is and if you do advertise via a facebook page which is bitcoin related than the audience there is much smaller than this forum.

More than 800k users in the forum , all know what bitcoin is, I don't know any other place more effective than this forum to advertise your services or websites if they are bitcoin related.

I think the effectivity of any campaign (whether it is signature or twitter) depends on the members who advertise this product or this altcoin, the crypto community has many concerns as we can watch in this forum, there are gambling fans, trading fans, altcoins fans, so for example when you want to advertise a casino with members who are not interested in gambling or do not post in gambling section, the campaign will be less effective, but when you choose the members who post daily in gambling section, you will reach your goal, therefore I do not prefer a signature campaign or social media campaign, because both kinds can be effective in some cases.

For me signature campaign is more effective let's say you want to advertise your gambling sites all of the members here are more oriented than the social media users so if you will advertise in social media they don't really have an idea especially on bitcoins and there possibilities that they will think your site is a scam.

For me, it is both depending on the service you are offering and the target customers. Signature campaign has a small target group range but the targets are homogeneous unlike social media where will have a broad range of people who are heterogeneous.

Signature campaign is really effective here in this forum as majority of people here are crytocurrencies enthusiast. Even more effective if the advertisement is a crypto related product.

This is effective too on social media campaign if they will focus on advertising it on those crypto related groups and money making social groups. If it will spread out just generally on their friends list it will not be effective as most people in social media are not that crypto maniac.

The social campaign can be very effective and have very interesting aspect. My experience is where I participated in several social campaigns (twitter usually) and many of this promoted services I continued to use.
If you must write something about the campaign, you must first to read and learn more about them.
I think campaign, where promoters interact with the service that promotes, is win-win combination

have been thinking also of what could justify the higher pay in signature campaign if the effectiveness of the campaign is not known.

I think both have their advantages and disadvantages.

While with social media campaign you can interact with more people, bitcointalk signature campaign has more narrow targeting. The majority of bitcointalk users are already know about bitcoin and are eager to use bitcoin related services.
On the other hand in social media you are able to find absolutely new people, who are not awre about your rivals' services.

The choice is yours, however, using the combination of marketing channels may be the best decision.

Well this is the largest crypto community in the world. So I guess most of the fanatics are here and they are usually the top guys that are willing to invest, analyze or promote crypto projects. Social media is a big help too but marketing starts within the solid crypto community itself.

If you seen signature campaign here it is because this forum is related in bitcoin and their business are related in bitcoin compare in facebook..
If i have a bitcoin busines related ill stay in signature campaign.  and i am sure i will gain large traffic than in social campaign.. since not all friends in facebook are knows about bitcoin so its a good choice if you stay in this forum..

Bitcointalk is best place for promoting everything related to criptocarencies and blochchain this is evident.
Twitter and facebook are to large for this.

---

I believe signature campaigns must evolve, and managers must find way for everybody to be happy. This is very profitable as marketing choice, but we can improve this by proposing diferent prices for posts. This can be more tasks for menagers but definitely will improve posts quality. More effort you give in creating posts more fee you will get for example. This way campaigns can be even more efective!

Both of them are good to get in but signature campaigns required posts count where it should be constructive so this the reason that members participate in  sig campaign earn more than social media participants because of the efforts done .

Agreed, signature campaign is better because all people here is know about cryptocurrency, altough social media campaign also one of good way to introduce about cryptocurrency to others people outside bitcointalk members.

Both Signature & Social Media Campaign are effective. But in my opinion, Social Media Campaign is slightly more effective than Signature Campaign.


Signature Campaigns are good If only the targeted audience are Crypto Community fans and Enthusiasts. But If you want to reach a large audience If when They're not into Cryptocurrency, You can recruit them (Maybe). That way, It's a win win for you. Aside that, Social Media has always been a traditional place to advertise Products/services. There are Lot's of Crypto Enthusiasts who are not on bitcointalk.

I think they are  both effective campaign. Signature campaign is effective because many people that are pure bitcoin enthusiast because this forum is for cryptocurrency only. Social media campaign is good too. Since social media is used by millions of people. So its a good place to introduce bitcoin. You can give knowlege people there bitcoin there. But im not sure if you can attract many people there because they are different on interests.

Signature campaign
Your targeting is the bitcoiners, because the signature campaign isn't going outside from the forum.

Social media campaign
Your targeting is the random person but it can be predicting are the bitcoiners viewers or not. But it can give you more field for advertising your innovation or stuff.

But I just take an example such as the exchange site advertise, and this will fully relate into the altcoin and we may be targeting the bticoiners to use our service. and signature campaign will be more useful.

If you want to attract more people on this forum, signature is more effective, example when you want to launch new gambling site, more member on this forum wearing the signature code about your gambling site, more people will come to your site to play but the successful of your site is still in your hand how you maintain your gambling site. Social media campaign is to attract more people and more general, many people don't use or become a member on this forum so social media campaign can effective too, see the target from your advertising.

I think signature campaign is more effective than social media for now, but well see in the near future if bitcoin becomes more popular around the world social media maybe become more effective than signature campaign here in bitcoin-talk, most of social media users today have no enough idea about bitcoins but someday i will go for social campaigns lets see.   

I agree to you that sig campaign are more useful than the other. Most of the campaign here are related to Bitcoin and if you want to attract Bitcoiners, you have to run a signature campaign instead of Social media campaign. Another thing is that social media is full of bots, unreal people so that it is hard to achieve success from it

Comparing social media campaign and signature campaigns depends on a few things. If you are targeting people who are crypto-enthusiasts, then signature campaigns will prove to be more effective than the social media campaigns. If you are targeting people of all walks of life probably to educate and gain new signings, then social media campaign will be more effective than signature campaigns.

I couldn't agree more with you, it's based on the target market and so each has its strength and it depends on the campaign manager's ability to maximum his campaign by adopting the right platform. At times it's good to advertise among people in the crypto world and sometimes you target outsiders depending on how you want to reach out.

in my opinion is certainly more effective signature campaign, this is because twitter is too much and how fast the tweet so that people will ignore all the tweets. once again this is my opinion.

If anyone will want to promote their product on this forum or on bitcoin community then they have to take the support of signature campaign because the signature campaign provide more interest for the member on this forum while for social media no one know that from where is the crowd.

Yes true, I take the example of social media twitter is most widely used. When we did all the things associated with bitcoin, certainly the signature campaign was the most effective in this forum. in my opinion, too many fake twitter followers so that most of them don't care what in the tweets.

when you do social media signature campaign, it means that you need to explain a little about cryptocurrency or bitcoin. even there are many rich people on social media, but probably they do not know cryptocurrency. however, it is good to promote cryptocurrency too. but I prefer signature campaign on this forum. it is more effective.

With the so called signature campaign, I noticed most times i get to know about project through the announcement thread not signature campaign/avatar. The ANN thread is where the project is discussed and probable link to websites and blogs. Most signature/avatar say little about the projects, ,most times I dont care unless have seen the logo on icocountdown.

BItcoinTalk is best place for advertising because here we have miners, gamers, investors, coders, all in the one place and all interested in new projects, Few members here are real gold here, and i bealive real oportunity for merchants for small money to get best quality they can get. Signature doesn't need to be part of an campaign to be rented that is what i'm talking about.

They are both effective actually. But in terms of bitcoin related it is much more effective here in this thread forum, while in social media. Why? It is because if the even campaign will be implemented here most of the community are much familiar with bitcoin. unlike in social media, most of it are not familiar with it, they cannot get it so easily compare here.

if we compare & analogies from business side:

Signature campaign in bitcointalk:
- Business As in the euro zone.
- Quality of promotion participants applied.
- Many of rules are applied.

Social media campaign:
- Business As in China (Asia Zone).
- Quality is number two.
- Rules are made a bit lighter (spam not be a severe problem).

Both are equally good and prospectively, but for Bitcoin market, we know who is superior.

My honest opinion, promotion in social media more effectively. Signature campaign in bitcointalk is exclusive. But, the campaign manager had forgotten one thing, promoting campaign is not only targeting personal qualities, but many interest globally.

Principle of marketing is to find a lot of customers from various classes and skills, so that they become successful product after promo. Quality comes after a lot of interest from the participants and readers.

If the companies choose for top/best managers for promoting their products then they will work better for new managers you will see sometimes some managers only start withut some knowledge and sometimes some managers come without any past experience and they work outstanding.

In my personal opinion,I thing both of campaign are pretty effective to achieve your goals.If we compared between signature campaign & social media campaign then sig campaign will take first position.As all campaign are belonged to this  also you guys are here that means we all already have good knowledge about crypto worlds.In here sig campaign are more effective to promote your products or service and will get success also meet the market target.When it comes to the usage of social media in order to achieve your goals it really bring together potential customers that helps run a successful campaign.

yes both have their own benefits, signature campaign through this form is best, because here all the people are related to bitcoin and they discuss all the aspects of bitcoin here, here you remain specific to bitcoin users. on other side social media campaign is also effective, but think signature campaign is the best.

That's really interesting.
I'm just starting my own bitcoin business and think about how to gain users.
Does anyone here has some experience or statistics about campaigns?
Maybe I can put different links for signature campaign and social networks campaign and see how it goes.

well for that you need to look or the help of those people who is expert to run on that and that is a campaign managers so that they can give you proper advice and info about stats on where are the most effective among other two advertising strategies, but if you want to target huge volume of people well its better that apply both social media's and sig campaign out here to see much better result.

You maybe right in your opinion, but even is like that you informed others in the social media whether facebook or twitter still most of there community are refusing it, only few of them are being curious about it. It maybe a lot of millions of peoples subscribe in the social media but the reality of believing in cryptocurrencies 1% all around the world. But in signature campaign, it may not have a volume of people in bitcoin world but the average of believing in crypto was still higher than a social media.

To be honest I think social media campaign is more effective because almost all people in this world have social media accounts, a little bit different with sign campaign which is only forum members or bitcoiners who will see the advertisement. Social media campaign can cover non bitcoiners and may attract much more people who never heard about bitcoin. Of course it needs to have social media accounts with many real friends/followers and needs a great advertising tweets/posts with interesting hastags.

I think signature campaign is more effective than social media campaign because more bitcoin users can appreciate in bitcoin forum and they could get the right info they want here. Unlike social media, some viewers that don't know btc yet just ignore the campaigns and is only having good feedbacks from bitcoin user thats linked to social media only.

I think both of them have their own use and they can't really be compared. Like people in the forum is so different from social media. Especially if you are advertising a service or product that is centered with bitcoins or other crypocurrency. In that case the forum would be the best place to be. Since in social media, most likely if the advertiser's audience is not familiar with bitcoin then it would just be ignored.

I don't know if social media advertisement would be ignored or not. but I can see new altcoin projects are giving equally priority to both social media and signature campaigns. and doing social media marketing on large bases. and if someone seen on a place a lot of time than it will surely get peoples attraction. same as social media campaigns.

In social media, it will depend on the type of people that will being spreaded out of the information.

If randomly distributed then it has 50/50 chance to land on those people who have an idea about crypto related thing. But there are facebook group that is crypto related and a user can add those people involved in that group and then do the social media advertising. In that way, the traffic will also passed to those persons involved in crypto world.

I think campaign here have more effect then socialnmedia campaigns. Here on forum I'm more informed then on social networks, and here I clicked on signatures many times, on social networks usually I hide all the unnecessary informations. That is my example, and I know many others who don't vlivl on any advertisements on social networks.

In my own opinion, I will go for the combination of both to complement each other. But if I am to pick my favorite, I will still go for Signature campaigns. The social media is so dispersed that some people here separates their real lives form bitcoin world which means advertising on my facebook will mean sending message to those who are not interested but Signature campaigns will do otherwise as it will be available to those population rightly interested into what one is offering...

both has also an advantages and it's the way that you can promote your business and you can give an opportunity to the people who are looking for an extra aside from that social media campaign is able to promote and give information to more people but not all people on the social media has an knowledge or an idea about how your business works especially when it is crypto currency related and they don't even know what is it . while in signature campaign all people can easily understand how the business is working but it is only applicable on a certain place such as forum . both campaign could be effective but only for those people who already has a knowledge about crypto currency or bitcoin .

Signature campaign I think still is a lot better than facebook and twitter campaign there are just too few people in the social media that are willing to engage to crypto knowing that we are pretty much into anonymity. I do visit facebook for I also have an account yet none of my real friends offline knew I was into crypto. 

I remember Stellar distributes their coin through facebook but it didn't work and only thousands of fake users got it.

Both of them has different significant role social media like face book and twitter will get awareness of specific identity in social media. Where as signature campaign is to get awareness about specific launch of the coin in this forum

Which is correct they cater different audience and most of the projects really needed this two advertisement to encourage investors and also to bring attention as if those people seen this ads for sure they will be aware of the project existence.

both campaign are effective, social media campaign is effective since it reach a huge number of people around the world, signature campaign on the other hand is also effective since every post of the one bearing the signature will be a promotional tool for the signature appeared on his/her post.
social media targeted everyone even those not engage on cryptos, while signature campaign targeted those already crypto enthusiasts that were members of the forum.

Defiantly, social media is good for reaching out more people and attracting other who never heard of bitcoin, but like you said it requires you to have a good friend base or followers base, signature campaign on the other hand does not require you to have anything you just need to post constantly and talk with others on this forum, but I guess if you need to get paid more you need to rank up your account, so they both have their pros and cons.

As for me I would prefer to choose signature campaign over social media campaign especially If the Product I am advertising is a crypto related one ! This forum has a thousands of visitors in a daily basis so If you want to promote your website/services/product I think signature campaign is a good choice !

Social media campaign is more effective when some start up try to introduce their business with the same bitcoin technology like blockchain. Innovation in a project could get more impression in social media because lots of people love to see something new.
But if you create a new altcoin and want people know your bounty, signature campaign in this forum is more effective than social media campaign.

Hello OP, I guess if the campaign is related too much in bitcoin the most effective way to advertise it is here in the forum, and tho we can see that there are  much more chance that people can see it in social media, but those who are totally bitcoin enthusiast is here, they can easily access it here and view. But most effective way of advertising in any kind of stuff or services you want to be advertised is the social media, where there are real friends and followers so it is kind of effective. But it is better if you use both.

i think both have their benefit that is why some devs ( in Altcoin ICO ) made signature and social media campaign to promote their ICO.

I think social media campaigns are much better, especially that with social media sites you can track specific groups. For instance, when someone likes casinos on FB, we know he is a possible gambler.
Bitcointalk campaigns don't target specific users, but rather a much larger group of bitcoin users. Also, this forum has only a couple thousand active users, which is nothing compared to FB or Twitter.

There is difference between both type of campaigns. Signature campaign will provide the fine income but it will never spread outside the forum about bitcoins but social campaigns is best option to spread the bitcoin in the social media and due to this we can find some decent adoption.

Before I read your post, I wanted to write that the best solution is combo - combination of both types of campaigns.
After reading your post, came to my mind that it is not so simple ..
It seems to me that everything depends on the product.
We must decide if we want to reach only a litlle, but very carefully precised group of clients only on bitcointalk, or maybe we want show our product to a wider audience through social media ..
Anyway I will choose combo of both ;)

Both methods are effective when advertising and is best to do both at the same time . But it depends on the owners budget for promotion . Signature Campaigns costs a lot compared to social media . If you want to focus mainly on spreading awareness then go for social media but Signature campaigns here is best when boosting sales cause all of your audience her is a bitcoin user  unlike in social media that everyone can certainly view tweets but if they don't have bitcoin it won't have an effect in your sales .

That is the problem with social media campaigns, though you can remedy this by hiring people whose audience are all bitcoiners too. For example, hiring someone who owns a facebook group dedicated to bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies. That would be as effective as a signature campaign in my opinion.

Yes there are already lots of facebook groups that crypto related so advertising it there will somehow sort the target of the campaign that will be done in social media. Like here in our country, Im a member of I think 5 facebook crypto related group and money making online group and lots of crypto advertisement are present almost everyday.

Good opportunity to catch those person/s with knowledge in crypto related thing.

Yes there are differences between two of them but it depends upon on your target viewers.

Since we are into crypto currencies the best way to advertise is through here in forum with signature campaigns.

Although there are people who are in social media, it can be also another good way to promote something.

Yes, so both are effective way of earn views of your advertising stuff or services, thousands can see your advertisement since thousands of accounts are here and in social media, and both are not hard to make some advertisement. Both can attract different type of customers.

it's good in a social media campaign, it will be more reach all people when compared with the signature, all of them have advantages and disadvantages, that in social media, many people came to know but is likely to come join relatively small. different from the signature to the point in this context largely already understood what the message in question in the signature campaign and the possibility to join the relatively large.

It depends on your target and what you are advertising. For example if you are advertising a wallet service, mixer, exchange,... its better a signature campaign on this forum (your public is users with bitcoin interest). For casinos, shops,...  social media campaigns can reach more people.

We have different kinds of  signature campaigns that can either be a mere service or altcoin  ICO, of which crowd funding for ICOs can be got from forum members here who have an understanding of cryptos... which is the right target and for social media campaigns these are more targeted at getting users to try out something new which is more of a gamble to owners of the sig as they try to increase their user base. But I think both should be run to be more effective and  get to the right audience.

Both methods are good, but to a point. Targeting social media groups when you want to trade bitcoin can be not as effective as a sig campaign on a bitcoin forum, but if you want to sell something everyone uses, like shoes, it's best to advertise everywhere both on a bitcoin forum and social media sites.

both of them certainly have their respective advantages. I think social campaign is more focused on those who are not familiar with bitcoin. and a signature campaign focused on bitcoin users to use their bitcoin, the place could be exchange, gambling sites and others.

Not only signature campaign gives more exposure it also help get good search rankings in google as well.Social media campaign also have there advantages but they have more limitations also like character limit on twitter etc.I think if something is bitcoin related and need promotion,BTT signature campaigns are best

I think only those who have run both campaign would be able to tell you which of these two campaigns are more effective.I am sure differnt campaign owners will have different opinion.
From a member's perspective,I would say signature campaign are more effective because a signature attracts more attention and it contains more info like link to website,bitcointalk thread etc than a post on social media would.

both have advantages since if you advertise via sig here people could truly see the one who advertised and focused the market here in btc aswell as in facebook and any other social media where we can see more spam post and greater audience where also good to target interms of advertising, i cannot call only Bct eig advertising is the best since there are sites who managed to get their success social media campaigns.

Signature campaign is more effective than social media campaign if the business related bitcoin
and on bitcointalk are user's bitcoin at leat knowing about bitcoin ,
but if they are not related bitcoin social media campaign is more effective
because on social media many people who don't know about bitcoin.

I guess so, you have your point, but do you think all people in social media are interested about it (bitcoin)? As I encountered, people on social media dont know about bitcoin cryptocurrency. Maybe through social media bitcoin word would spread in the world but not all users in social media are interested to read or even understand it. Even explaining to a person personally, they dont understand it easily, also in social media, it is hard to understand unless a person wanted to know it.

I guess it depends on your target market. Using the social media as your jump off point of your new site is good but I noticed that in FB pages related to Bitcoin, most of them are promoting links to scam sites like those doublers and other sites that requires investment. I seldom see gambling sites being promoted, while in this forum, you will see a lot of the campaigns are related to gambling sites like dice sites and casino's. Last time I see a campaign related to investment is about ore-mine.

I don't think social media advertising is effective unless the target audience is interested in bitcoin. For example, getting a bitcoin related account to post about your service would work, but a random person posting about the same service might not.

I think another way to advertise on social media would be to take advantage of the targeting tags when you buy a facebook ad to specifically target bitcoin users.

For me the most effective of them all is signature campaign. Why? Who have interest about  Altcoin, Bitcoin, Bitcoin projects, Bitcoin Gambling and Etc. All who have interest on bitcoin is here in forum. So the most effective is signature campaign. In Social Media Campaign is effective too, but only few investors, user, player they can get there.

Yeah exactly, since all people is in social media but not people in social are in bitcoin and most of the people in social is on facebook (e.g., posting status/pictures/videos, reading convos). Though advertising bitcoin is effective through social media but not all people are fun or users with it. Even in my place, they are very curious about bitcoin but they don't want to use it.

Unlike others who believe in signature campaigns, I go with social media campaigns. The fact here is that I agree that users over here are using the currency and are aware of what is blockchain technology about and how it works. Social media is open to users who are may be unaware of this currency and would/may likely be interested in learning about blockchain technology. Signature campaigns on this forum may get the required exposure but if they have ads on Facebook/Twitter and promote their website effectively, they may get much more leads than they would get on this forum which is a limited source. That's the reason brands/companies have focus groups as well as promote their brand actively on Twitter and Youtube which gives them a better exposure.

Both will be effective if run simultaneously as the will reach a larger audience   but if advertising funds are limited to one campaign then you will have to know which user group you are targeting whether its users already using crypto{veterans} then signature campaign can be used , or you will be  looking for a freshman to try out your services then social media campaign will be a good reach.

More effective for who, the employer or the employee? Most profitable for employees are the signature campaigns. The social media campaigns don't give us many chances of profit, even because there are too less social media campaigns than signature campaigns on this forum. But for who wants to promote his business I believe the signature campaign is a bit better, because here he will find the target public, people who probably have more interest for what he wants to promote.

You can earn more from signature campaign. There are much more signature then social media campaigns and they are better paid.
But for employer who wants to advertise his product or service to a wider circle of people social media are better because they are available to larger number of people and more popular.

If you're not a shit poster,you'd know it is not as easy to earn from signature campaigns.With the rules getting stricter as time passes by,there would be a point where only very high quality posters will be privileged to earn from signature campaigns which is worth the advertisers money.

Signature campaign has to be more effective based on the fact that people on here are going to be interested in things relating to crypto, gambling, and so on relating to bitcoin. That's pretty evident as this is a bitcoin forum and people are being targeted in the best marketing way possible.

The difference on twitter is that most of your followers may not give a flying fuck about some random internet currencies bullshit which means you miss out on marketing to those people as they don't even have bitcoin. You want to target people who'll have a usage for the service itself.

But signature campaign only gather viewer from forum , just one resource !
Compare if we use social media campaign that able reach people around the world especially if they have legit crypto followers !

It depends on the target audience or market, some people will go for signature campaign if their targeted market is cryptocurrencies lovers, but if it is a dynamics market social media campaign should be better

I can't agree with this also. Using both signature campaign and social media campaign are both effective in their own ways, and also all the signature campaigns here are related to bitcoins, even though it is altcoin, then it is related to bitcoin because you would convert it anyways in bitcoin to have more profit, and this altcoins would not be here right now, if bitcoin does not exist in the first place.

I think it is also regarding what you want to achieve as well as the product. If its pure bitcoin related thing like a casino or something you may think it is only bitcointalk signature campaign but having some social media presence also means that you will show more trust.

I do not trust a casino that has its last post 2 years ago. I want to play on a social and active casino, I want to talk with the owner-mods or whatever they have and see them do promotions on social media. Primedice would be a great example.

Which one is more effective? The one that pays me more bitcoin. Full stop.


Oh, for the business owner? You gotta think about your target market first - where do the people that buy your goods and services go online? Go there, and advertise.

OP ask about the most effective campaign, not from where the user can earn more.
Also i agree with @ Joel_Jantsen about the signature is an easy job. It is only of you spamming on the forum.

Then maybe a mixture of both is the better,because social media campaign can reach more people around the world but only if they know some terms that are spoken in forums, it could be effective in almost cases.We must not forget that in social media they talk about everything so sometimes they do not pay attention to everything, so the forums are more convenient because they are more specialized in something, as in this case.

If talk of a more effective campaign is relative and depends on each person or needs. Between the signature campaign and social media campaign are both very easy because we get paid only posting, it like advertising a website. But the signature campaign is more desirable because they are paid higher. But if for marketing new site I think is more effective social media campaign, because to reach people more widely. Both have of each advantages.

Agree, it is not about that which campaign is better/more effective. It is about what kind of service we want to promote and what is the target. 99% of Bitcointalk users already use Bitcoin, so if someone is looking for new/fresh customers, for him much better will be social media campaign. For those who are looking for strict and only Bitcoin users i would advice Bitcointalk signature campaign. Anyway everyone know that only one stream of advertisement is not good, so to be honest i will run both - social media and signature campaigns together.

Coming to promotion both are very effective because social media campaign is a viral advertising and signature campaign is awareness advertising. So each has it's own unique features but most of the owners spent money for signature campaign when compared to social media.

Most of the signature campaign in bitcoin world is most often happened in bitcointalk forum and they can get fund mostly here in this industry not in the social media. Because in the social media campaign their participants was also the subscribers in the social media too. So same scenario in cryptocurrency and bitcoin world.

All the signature campaigns on this forum require a rank of Jr. member or higher and even then they don’t pay you that much, however social campaigns still do not pay that much but they don’t require you to have a high rank so even a newbie can get in, hence we cannot expect effective promotions from newbie.

But signature campaign just targets crtpto users or just this forum members whereas social media campaigns target rest of world too.

I think both is pretty much good if these two platforms has millions of users then promoting your site is good either in these two.
The only difference is that Bitcointalk community has a knowledge about crypto-currencies and knows what bitcoin is, while on social media sites there are only plenty of users who has a knowledge in Altcoins.
Depending on the site you are trying to promote, if is some kind of a blog site and you need visits to boost your traffic then both is good but if is Altcoin related, bitcointalk is the best pick.

That is certainly true, but I see that it all depends on the target that they seek. For those who do that all have different targets and sometimes they do the right thing. not forever signature gives a positive impact for those who hold and not always social media give positive impact, it all depends on how we use media that we are very strategic. So, think back to everything before deciding something so that the results obtained are more optimally

This is true only if you're advertising a business that deals exclusively with Bitcoin. In such case a signature campaign will probably find more target audience on a Bitcoin forum, like this one.
If the business accepts both Bitcoin and fiat payments, a social media campaign will find more target audience, because it addresses both Bitcoin and fiat users at the same time.

there are some numerous campaign has been failed since they didn't get their expected exposure on that time, and also i think if we combined those two campaigns surely advertisers can gain more success but its all matter really on how they can sustain it since sustaining a ad campaigns surely can cost a lot and making it running for long time is a must if we are aiming to get a long term users and lured them all.

Its normal that some numerous campaigns will be failed because of competitions with other sites raising campaigns in signature campaign. But if you ask me what would I prefer to have is, I would highly confirm that signature campaign is more effective rather than social media campaign. People viewing at social media doesn't gain any interest with the promotion that's been linked to their pages and yet most of them were avoiding to view ads in social media, including the campaigns we have.