signature campaign vs social media campaign, which is more effective?

[Strongkored]

If you want to attract more people on this forum, signature is more effective, example when you want to launch new gambling site, more member on this forum wearing the signature code about your gambling site, more people will come to your site to play but the successful of your site is still in your hand how you maintain your gambling site. Social media campaign is to attract more people and more general, many people don't use or become a member on this forum so social media campaign can effective too, see the target from your advertising.

[1714925126]

1714925126

[1714925126]

1714925126

[1714925126]

1714925126

[1714925126]

1714925126

[1714925126]

1714925126

[ice18]

I think signature campaign is more effective than social media for now, but well see in the near future if bitcoin becomes more popular around the world social media maybe become more effective than signature campaign here in bitcoin-talk, most of social media users today have no enough idea about bitcoins but someday i will go for social campaigns lets see.   

[soul-impact]

Signature stays within this forum, with varying elites of long year experience of blockchain technology while the world of the social media exposes projects to richer world of people who also looking for what to invest on. However, have not managed any campaign at both platform but like to know, to what advantage has signature campaign taken over social media or vice versa in recent campaigns.

Signature campaign
Your targeting is the bitcoiners, because the signature campaign isn't going outside from the forum.

Social media campaign
Your targeting is the random person but it can be predicting are the bitcoiners viewers or not. But it can give you more field for advertising your innovation or stuff.

But I just take an example such as the exchange site advertise, and this will fully relate into the altcoin and we may be targeting the bticoiners to use our service. and signature campaign will be more useful.

I agree to you that sig campaign are more useful than the other. Most of the campaign here are related to Bitcoin and if you want to attract Bitcoiners, you have to run a signature campaign instead of Social media campaign. Another thing is that social media is full of bots, unreal people so that it is hard to achieve success from it

[danalt]

Comparing social media campaign and signature campaigns depends on a few things. If you are targeting people who are crypto-enthusiasts, then signature campaigns will prove to be more effective than the social media campaigns. If you are targeting people of all walks of life probably to educate and gain new signings, then social media campaign will be more effective than signature campaigns.

[szpalata]

Comparing social media campaign and signature campaigns depends on a few things. If you are targeting people who are crypto-enthusiasts, then signature campaigns will prove to be more effective than the social media campaigns. If you are targeting people of all walks of life probably to educate and gain new signings, then social media campaign will be more effective than signature campaigns.

I couldn't agree more with you, it's based on the target market and so each has its strength and it depends on the campaign manager's ability to maximum his campaign by adopting the right platform. At times it's good to advertise among people in the crypto world and sometimes you target outsiders depending on how you want to reach out.

[Liang_Kubur]

in my opinion is certainly more effective signature campaign, this is because twitter is too much and how fast the tweet so that people will ignore all the tweets. once again this is my opinion.

[Superzpay]

If anyone will want to promote their product on this forum or on bitcoin community then they have to take the support of signature campaign because the signature campaign provide more interest for the member on this forum while for social media no one know that from where is the crowd.

[JANGKRIK BOSS]

If anyone will want to promote their product on this forum or on bitcoin community then they have to take the support of signature campaign because the signature campaign provide more interest for the member on this forum while for social media no one know that from where is the crowd.

Yes true, I take the example of social media twitter is most widely used. When we did all the things associated with bitcoin, certainly the signature campaign was the most effective in this forum. in my opinion, too many fake twitter followers so that most of them don't care what in the tweets.

[nara1892]

It is both effective to be honest. Doing signature campaign and Social media campaign are just contributing something on the success of a project of a certain coin(the Cryptocurrencies), but in different aspects and ways. In the Social media campaign like twitter and facebook, this way, people that have no idea about Cryptocurrencies would be inform that such thing exist, since most of the people right now only knows cash, while in the signature campaign the people that they are informing are those people knows cryptocurrencies and the ones that do social media campaigns.

when you do social media signature campaign, it means that you need to explain a little about cryptocurrency or bitcoin. even there are many rich people on social media, but probably they do not know cryptocurrency. however, it is good to promote cryptocurrency too. but I prefer signature campaign on this forum. it is more effective.

[royalfestus]

With the so called signature campaign, I noticed most times i get to know about project through the announcement thread not signature campaign/avatar. The ANN thread is where the project is discussed and probable link to websites and blogs. Most signature/avatar say little about the projects, ,most times I dont care unless have seen the logo on icocountdown.

[arbitrage]

BItcoinTalk is best place for advertising because here we have miners, gamers, investors, coders, all in the one place and all interested in new projects, Few members here are real gold here, and i bealive real oportunity for merchants for small money to get best quality they can get. Signature doesn't need to be part of an campaign to be rented that is what i'm talking about.

[dearbesz1219]

Signature stays within this forum, with varying elites of long year experience of blockchain technology while the world of the social media exposes projects to richer world of people who also looking for what to invest on. However, have not managed any campaign at both platform but like to know, to what advantage has signature campaign taken over social media or vice versa in recent campaigns.

They are both effective actually. But in terms of bitcoin related it is much more effective here in this thread forum, while in social media. Why? It is because if the even campaign will be implemented here most of the community are much familiar with bitcoin. unlike in social media, most of it are not familiar with it, they cannot get it so easily compare here.

[the rise]

if we compare & analogies from business side:

Signature campaign in bitcointalk:
- Business As in the euro zone.
- Quality of promotion participants applied.
- Many of rules are applied.

Social media campaign:
- Business As in China (Asia Zone).
- Quality is number two.
- Rules are made a bit lighter (spam not be a severe problem).

Both are equally good and prospectively, but for Bitcoin market, we know who is superior.

My honest opinion, promotion in social media more effectively. Signature campaign in bitcointalk is exclusive. But, the campaign manager had forgotten one thing, promoting campaign is not only targeting personal qualities, but many interest globally.

Principle of marketing is to find a lot of customers from various classes and skills, so that they become successful product after promo. Quality comes after a lot of interest from the participants and readers.

[Vikingr]

if we compare & analogies from business side:

Signature campaign in bitcointalk:
- Business As in the euro zone.
- Quality of promotion participants applied.
- Many of rules are applied.

Social media campaign:
- Business As in China (Asia Zone).
- Quality is number two.
- Rules are made a bit lighter (spam not be a severe problem).

Both are equally good and prospectively, but for Bitcoin market, we know who is superior.

My honest opinion, promotion in social media more effectively. Signature campaign in bitcointalk is exclusive. But, the campaign manager had forgotten one thing, promoting campaign is not only targeting personal qualities, but many interest globally.

Principle of marketing is to find a lot of customers from various classes and skills, so that they become successful product after promo. Quality comes after a lot of interest from the participants and readers.

If the companies choose for top/best managers for promoting their products then they will work better for new managers you will see sometimes some managers only start withut some knowledge and sometimes some managers come without any past experience and they work outstanding.

[mrjoy15]

In my personal opinion,I thing both of campaign are pretty effective to achieve your goals.If we compared between signature campaign & social media campaign then sig campaign will take first position.As all campaign are belonged to this  also you guys are here that means we all already have good knowledge about crypto worlds.In here sig campaign are more effective to promote your products or service and will get success also meet the market target.When it comes to the usage of social media in order to achieve your goals it really bring together potential customers that helps run a successful campaign.

[markyminer]

In my personal opinion,I thing both of campaign are pretty effective to achieve your goals.If we compared between signature campaign & social media campaign then sig campaign will take first position.As all campaign are belonged to this  also you guys are here that means we all already have good knowledge about crypto worlds.In here sig campaign are more effective to promote your products or service and will get success also meet the market target.When it comes to the usage of social media in order to achieve your goals it really bring together potential customers that helps run a successful campaign.

yes both have their own benefits, signature campaign through this form is best, because here all the people are related to bitcoin and they discuss all the aspects of bitcoin here, here you remain specific to bitcoin users. on other side social media campaign is also effective, but think signature campaign is the best.

[sir.humus]

That's really interesting.
I'm just starting my own bitcoin business and think about how to gain users.
Does anyone here has some experience or statistics about campaigns?
Maybe I can put different links for signature campaign and social networks campaign and see how it goes.

[ultrloa]

That's really interesting.
I'm just starting my own bitcoin business and think about how to gain users.
Does anyone here has some experience or statistics about campaigns?
Maybe I can put different links for signature campaign and social networks campaign and see how it goes.

well for that you need to look or the help of those people who is expert to run on that and that is a campaign managers so that they can give you proper advice and info about stats on where are the most effective among other two advertising strategies, but if you want to target huge volume of people well its better that apply both social media's and sig campaign out here to see much better result.

[bravehearth0319]

It is both effective to be honest. Doing signature campaign and Social media campaign are just contributing something on the success of a project of a certain coin(the Cryptocurrencies), but in different aspects and ways. In the Social media campaign like twitter and facebook, this way, people that have no idea about Cryptocurrencies would be inform that such thing exist, since most of the people right now only knows cash, while in the signature campaign the people that they are informing are those people knows cryptocurrencies and the ones that do social media campaigns.

You maybe right in your opinion, but even is like that you informed others in the social media whether facebook or twitter still most of there community are refusing it, only few of them are being curious about it. It maybe a lot of millions of peoples subscribe in the social media but the reality of believing in cryptocurrencies 1% all around the world. But in signature campaign, it may not have a volume of people in bitcoin world but the average of believing in crypto was still higher than a social media.

[panjul07]

To be honest I think social media campaign is more effective because almost all people in this world have social media accounts, a little bit different with sign campaign which is only forum members or bitcoiners who will see the advertisement. Social media campaign can cover non bitcoiners and may attract much more people who never heard about bitcoin. Of course it needs to have social media accounts with many real friends/followers and needs a great advertising tweets/posts with interesting hastags.