Bitcoin Forum

Bitcoin => Bitcoin Discussion => Topic started by: Dimelord on March 10, 2017, 03:05:30 AM



Title: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: Dimelord on March 10, 2017, 03:05:30 AM
The australian computer scientist Craig wright is continuing his effort to get lots of digital currency and block chain patents and claims to be Satoshi nakamoto. Satoshi published the bitcoin white paper and dissapeared after releasing versions of bitcoin.Patent race is going on.Wright is fighting with some 70 banks to get the patent.If any of them got patent for bitcoin,then what would happen???


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: Vaskiy on March 10, 2017, 03:23:18 AM
The australian computer scientist Craig wright is continuing his effort to get lots of digital currency and block chain patents and claims to be Satoshi nakamoto. Satoshi published the bitcoin white paper and dissapeared after releasing versions of bitcoin.Patent race is going on.Wright is fighting with some 70 banks to get the patent.If any of them got patent for bitcoin,then what would happen???
In a recent days article it's been explained about the patent application for 70 bitcoin and blockchain based technology invention through his lawyer. In my opinion such an effort is based on the upcoming etf, because when bitcoin ETF is approved the trading regulations serve similar to shares. This gets him a patent earning wherever it gets implemented. I don't think he'll be given patent rights, because his identity as Satoshi is not yet confirmed.


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: AliceWonderMiscreations on March 10, 2017, 05:14:44 AM
The australian computer scientist Craig wright is continuing his effort to get lots of digital currency and block chain patents and claims to be Satoshi nakamoto. Satoshi published the bitcoin white paper and dissapeared after releasing versions of bitcoin.Patent race is going on.Wright is fighting with some 70 banks to get the patent.If any of them got patent for bitcoin,then what would happen???
In a recent days article it's been explained about the patent application for 70 bitcoin and blockchain based technology invention through his lawyer. In my opinion such an effort is based on the upcoming etf, because when bitcoin ETF is approved the trading regulations serve similar to shares. This gets him a patent earning wherever it gets implemented. I don't think he'll be given patent rights, because his identity as Satoshi is not yet confirmed.

I hope the real Satoshi sends a message to the media signed by a key only the real Satoshi has denouncing software patents.


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: davis196 on March 10, 2017, 05:48:26 AM
The australian computer scientist Craig wright is continuing his effort to get lots of digital currency and block chain patents and claims to be Satoshi nakamoto. Satoshi published the bitcoin white paper and dissapeared after releasing versions of bitcoin.Patent race is going on.Wright is fighting with some 70 banks to get the patent.If any of them got patent for bitcoin,then what would happen???
In a recent days article it's been explained about the patent application for 70 bitcoin and blockchain based technology invention through his lawyer. In my opinion such an effort is based on the upcoming etf, because when bitcoin ETF is approved the trading regulations serve similar to shares. This gets him a patent earning wherever it gets implemented. I don't think he'll be given patent rights, because his identity as Satoshi is not yet confirmed.

I hope the real Satoshi sends a message to the media signed by a key only the real Satoshi has denouncing software patents.

The blockchain is free and open source and some guy appears and wants to patent all the technology just to make money.This is ridiculous.
I`m still wondering why Satoshi Nakamoto left the bitcoin community?
Perhaps he was dissapointed by somethig.


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: amacar2 on March 10, 2017, 06:16:46 AM
I hope the real Satoshi sends a message to the media signed by a key only the real Satoshi has denouncing software patents.
If he do so, than that will be a real disaster. There will be fear all over the market if real satoshi shows any signs of his life and also he don't have to do this to prove craig is not real satoshi. Everybody knows that he can't be satoshi and he is just trying to take the fame of bitcoin/blockchain technology.


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: Kemarit on March 10, 2017, 06:58:01 AM
This Satoshi wannabe is a intellectual property land graber. And it looks like he is doing it for money because he knows  that succesful patents could be worth billions of dollars. We all know that Satoshi or who ever he is made bitcoin and blockchain with an idea that it is independent of any central authority. But if ever it would be patented, it will take away our monetary freedom from anyone. But I have to agree, I don't think he will be given a patent though, because he haven't proven that he is Satoshi.

https://arstechnica.com/business/2016/05/craig-wright-i-dont-have-the-courage-to-prove-im-satoshi-nakamoto/ (https://arstechnica.com/business/2016/05/craig-wright-i-dont-have-the-courage-to-prove-im-satoshi-nakamoto/)



Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: Telepo on March 10, 2017, 07:06:12 AM
The australian computer scientist Craig wright is continuing his effort to get lots of digital currency and block chain patents and claims to be Satoshi nakamoto. Satoshi published the bitcoin white paper and dissapeared after releasing versions of bitcoin.Patent race is going on.Wright is fighting with some 70 banks to get the patent.If any of them got patent for bitcoin,then what would happen???

if this fact is right , Bitcoin price will be deeply down because he knows his digital currency clearly and we do not know how many coins he has got.


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: Opsamk on March 10, 2017, 07:07:25 AM
This is a tale as old as bitcoin's history.


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: bitcoinissatan on March 10, 2017, 07:28:39 AM
I just saw someone Craig looks like rubbish, she claimed is satoshi Nakamoto in fact I think bitcoin must evolve to live without satoshi Nakamoto, at least more and more people are afraid to hold bitcoin if there is someone who controls it :P


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: vnvizow on March 10, 2017, 07:32:23 AM
This is a tale as old as bitcoin's history.
Yup, and the funny thing is it's doesn't matter who's Satashi Nakamoto. The community will move on with or without him/her/them


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: NorrisK on March 10, 2017, 07:40:26 AM
I just saw someone Craig looks like rubbish, she claimed is satoshi Nakamoto in fact I think bitcoin must evolve to live without satoshi Nakamoto, at least more and more people are afraid to hold bitcoin if there is someone who controls it :P

It must indeed evolve to live on without satoshi, but that doesn't mean some idiots (including banks) should be able to patent and benefit of the work of someone else.

Bitcoin was created partially to get around all the corrupt things of the banking world, and now they are trying to claim it. I hope they never succeed, although they can ofcourse patent new applications of the technology.


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: Searing on March 10, 2017, 07:46:29 AM
He currently is acting like he is..patenting everything BTC related he can. He claims he is in line on Jan 1st 2020 to get a giant trust fund (of other founders now dead
or how he set it up to evade taxes) and that will then prove he is Satoshi..this paving the way as 'proof' for the above btc patents he is getting.

He really, really hates btc types like us now for NOT believing he is Satoshi (even if he really did not want to be found out by us and the Australian Tax Authorities)

thus imho if above is true he will dump massively ...screwing open source BTC and making it pear shaped..and then have control and $$$ via the patented stuff he

now can prove he is the inventor of btc

now I only give him a 1 out of 20 shot of being Satoshi (or part of the team)

but 'evil genius' wise it has a lot of "DR. EVIL' going for it ....on the above imho 'flimsy' projections / views above

it makes a damn fine 'boogeyman' story however for BTC bedtimes....shudder ..the horror :)



Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: bitcoinissatan on March 10, 2017, 07:49:44 AM
I just saw someone Craig looks like rubbish, she claimed is satoshi Nakamoto in fact I think bitcoin must evolve to live without satoshi Nakamoto, at least more and more people are afraid to hold bitcoin if there is someone who controls it :P

It must indeed evolve to live on without satoshi, but that doesn't mean some idiots (including banks) should be able to patent and benefit of the work of someone else.

Bitcoin was created partially to get around all the corrupt things of the banking world, and now they are trying to claim it. I hope they never succeed, although they can ofcourse patent new applications of the technology.
lol, I see developers and teams of each project altcoin easier to make altcoin them into the trash it is cool only to multiply the bitcoin them, so I hope also no attempts to make a patent for bitcoin, may it be big in the future without satoshi Nakamoto


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: NeuroticFish on March 10, 2017, 07:53:11 AM
Craig Wright is just a random broke guy that may have been close enough to Bitcoin team to know some "secrets", however, somebody that spends a lot of time trying to get rich on behalf of Bitcoin and Satoshi.
He's clearly not Satoshi, the last fiasco on proving it will remain in history.

I wish that somebody could stop him, because if he succeeds with his patents he has the opportunity to harm Bitcoin. And if that brings him financial gains, he'll do it in the blink of an eye.


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: olushakes on March 10, 2017, 07:59:00 AM
It even defies common sense for Craig Wright to be claiming he is Satoshi because how on earth will someone who claims to have invented this technology leave it open, only after some years when you now see the potentials then come back to start fighting over it. Then it means you never believe in the project from the beginning and even though you invented it which is even not ascertained, then you dont deserve any credit for it.


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: panopotty on March 10, 2017, 10:33:18 AM
I don't think he'll be given patent rights, because his identity as Satoshi is not yet confirmed.

a patent has nothing to do with him as satoshi

it has nothing to do with whether he is or not


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: Searing on March 10, 2017, 10:50:35 AM
I don't think he'll be given patent rights, because his identity as Satoshi is not yet confirmed.

a patent has nothing to do with him as satoshi

it has nothing to do with whether he is or not

it would help a lot however...and with maybe 15% to 20% of all BTC in existence ..he could make BTC do a merry little dance.....etc etc

it would NOT end well imho :(

then again...what do I know at one time I drank the BFL Kool Aid :(


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: panopotty on March 10, 2017, 01:44:59 PM
wright with code and BTC
Ayre with a shiteload of fiat....

that is a merry dance


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: funbarrel on March 10, 2017, 01:47:38 PM
The australian computer scientist Craig wright is continuing his effort to get lots of digital currency and block chain patents and claims to be Satoshi nakamoto. Satoshi published the bitcoin white paper and dissapeared after releasing versions of bitcoin.Patent race is going on.Wright is fighting with some 70 banks to get the patent.If any of them got patent for bitcoin,then what would happen???
then it would be kinda good because there wouldn't be so much shitcoins popping up every single day, but however it would be hard for the good coins to make fortune as well so it is good and bad at the same time... Though I wouldn't want for this to happen because it is always better to have more freedom from the banks and stuff like that.


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: theochino on March 10, 2017, 02:03:14 PM
It even defies common sense for Craig Wright to be claiming he is Satoshi because how on earth will someone who claims to have invented this technology leave it open, only after some years when you now see the potentials then come back to start fighting over it. Then it means you never believe in the project from the beginning and even though you invented it which is even not ascertained, then you dont deserve any credit for it.

If Craig is Satochi, why even bother with patent when one owe 40% of the coins around ?
That logic elude me.

A real computer scientist would not give a shit.

Theo Chino
Fighting the New York Man on Thursday http://www.article78againstNYDFS.com (Tipping gladly accepted)


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: panopotty on March 10, 2017, 02:08:43 PM
it is 5% and why did gates work wioth 100 billion

FB guy wuih 40 billion

money does not mean not working

duh


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: Searing on March 10, 2017, 03:23:53 PM
It even defies common sense for Craig Wright to be claiming he is Satoshi because how on earth will someone who claims to have invented this technology leave it open, only after some years when you now see the potentials then come back to start fighting over it. Then it means you never believe in the project from the beginning and even though you invented it which is even not ascertained, then you dont deserve any credit for it.

If Craig is Satochi, why even bother with patent when one owe 40% of the coins around ?
That logic elude me.

A real computer scientist would not give a shit.

Theo Chino
Fighting the New York Man on Thursday http://www.article78againstNYDFS.com (Tipping gladly accepted)

I agree with you ..but this is my only real 'black swan' once in a generation shot at hitting something venture capital wise
so OF COURSE THE ASIC/btc GODS shall smite me!!!!!! aragh.....

of course craig wright the 'twit' would be satoshi we would find out on a trust on jan 1st 2020 and he would flush 15-20% of all BTC just
to watch btc open source universe burn..because the majority of us mocked him as satoshi ..live on the patent money....be big man like trump
in a little man manner....argh!

don't really believe it but it gives me the shudders even thinking about it :(..(grrr.....must man up..its just a fable..btc boogeyman is not real) :(



Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: panopotty on March 10, 2017, 03:29:24 PM
https://www.ipo.gov.uk/types/patent/p-os/p-journal/p-pj?startYear=2013&startMonth=June&startDay=26th+-+6475&endYear=2017&endMonth=March&endDay=8th+-+6668&filter=nChain&perPage=100&sort=Publication+Date

https://www.ipo.gov.uk/types/patent/p-os/p-journal/p-pj?startYear=2013&startMonth=June&startDay=26th+-+6475&endYear=2017&endMonth=March&endDay=8th+-+6668&filter=ncip&perPage=100&sort=Publication+Date

https://www.ipo.gov.uk/types/patent/p-os/p-journal/p-pj?startYear=2013&startMonth=June&startDay=26th+-+6475&endYear=2017&endMonth=March&endDay=8th+-+6668&filter=eitc&perPage=100&sort=Publication+Date

3 7 73

that is 83 now that i can find

seeing how wright and ayre operate
maybe more?


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: panopotty on March 10, 2017, 03:33:47 PM
*** A real computer scientist would not give a shit. ***

satoshi was not a normal computer scientist h

he was a generalist.

ecominiocs
statistics
law
computer science.

Wright is tring to hide it and make ppl think he is not, but wrights PhD is in the uni library. so, they say no wright but ti is listed there

wright is in newcastle as a post grad stats - same wright

wright is in northumbria as postgrad law - same wright

U London has wright but cannot find details and nobody talks....

wright taught computer science...

i think wright is just trying to make us ignore him


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: panopotty on March 10, 2017, 04:06:09 PM
It even defies common sense for Craig Wright to be claiming he is Satoshi because how on earth will someone who claims to have invented this technology leave it open,

it make perfect sense

you mazke it open but you own a shiteload
people use it
your horde goes up

if you have a patent, it is not used as much
it less valuable

so wright got us all using and now wants to exploit


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: hv_ on March 10, 2017, 06:26:37 PM
*** A real computer scientist would not give a shit. ***

satoshi was not a normal computer scientist h

he was a generalist.

ecominiocs
statistics
law
computer science.

Wright is tring to hide it and make ppl think he is not, but wrights PhD is in the uni library. so, they say no wright but ti is listed there

wright is in newcastle as a post grad stats - same wright

wright is in northumbria as postgrad law - same wright

U London has wright but cannot find details and nobody talks....

wright taught computer science...

i think wright is just trying to make us ignore him

And some bamboozled


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: panopotty on March 10, 2017, 10:32:57 PM
yea

all of you who believed the story he wanted you to.

http://researchoutput.csu.edu.au/R?RN=384570219

it is all searchable
wright tryed to hide it and made us think it bs

but it is there
he got all the ppl thinking it lies so not a one now check

he make us all think not satoshi and we just not think and just dismiss


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: CloudStrife on April 02, 2017, 07:07:50 AM
I think the guy is a troll. It's hard to believe he has been naive to believe that people wouldn't disprove what he said.


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: panopotty on April 02, 2017, 10:15:13 AM
I think the guy is a troll. It's hard to believe he has been naive to believe that people wouldn't disprove what he said.

god. it is right there and wright has you all not even checking.


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: Dorky on April 02, 2017, 10:59:23 AM
Craig is not Satoshi.

I am.



Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: XVS on April 02, 2017, 11:07:32 AM
Anyone can claim anything. Does not proof anything.


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: andrew24p on April 04, 2017, 12:50:07 AM
I think Craig was probably friendly with or knows who satoshi is. That being said I dont think that he himself is satoshi.


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: aso118 on April 04, 2017, 01:03:56 AM
Craig Wright has lost all credibility with his claims.
If he really was Satoshi and wanted to convince the world, it would have been easy for him to do so. Unfortunately, he only tried fooling a few journalists.


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: Astvile on April 04, 2017, 01:29:47 AM
Anyone that is expert on computers and technology or even people who only have knowledge can proclaim as satoshi nakamoto since satoshi nakamoto is still anonymous to the users and bitcoin enthusiast.Everyone can claim that they are him and claim that bitcoin network is made by him but the true lies behind,


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: zimmah on April 04, 2017, 01:42:02 AM
Wow, this is old news.

It doesn't really matter who satoshi is, it's best if no one knows because bitcoin is better without a leader.

and if the government knows who satoshi is he might be in trouble.


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: AjithBtc on April 04, 2017, 02:35:41 AM
Wow, this is old news.

It doesn't really matter who satoshi is, it's best if no one knows because bitcoin is better without a leader.

and if the government knows who satoshi is he might be in trouble.
Yeah it's an long back news. Often someone claim themselves as Satoshi. It doesn't make an impact upon the price or any structured progressing of bitcoin. As the identity is still unknown, people to be popular use his name as the innovation is something which is gonna make lot changes.


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: jacktheking on April 04, 2017, 02:44:54 AM
Wow, this is old news.

It doesn't really matter who satoshi is, it's best if no one knows because bitcoin is better without a leader.

and if the government knows who satoshi is he might be in trouble.

You're right. Unless the government support new technology and idea, he shouldn't reveal himself until he is more comfortable. Bitcoin is doing well for the past few years without a "founder" but a "foundation"*. Bitcoin will continue to do well in the coming years. So, if you are not comfortable to reveal yourself, we understand you, Satoshi Nakamoto.

* does not mean Bitcoin will turns back if the founder reveal his real identity though. Maybe it will makes Bitcoin and Crypto technology better - for example, his government accept his invention and put in a lot of investment into it.

(for easier reference, I am referring to Satoshi Nakamoto as Male in this post). (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=104617.0)


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: zeze18 on April 04, 2017, 02:59:48 AM
so far widely circulated claiming to be the inventor and actors satoshi bitcoin history,
although some of them are not able to show proof of facts in favor of the discovery of bitcoin.


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: Herbert2020 on April 04, 2017, 06:07:01 AM
why are we even still arguing about this!

it is very simple. if you go to the bank and want to close your account for example they will ask you some identification, you can't tell the bank clerk i am me and you have to take my word for it, or say i showed my ID to some random guy and he approved i am me! you have to show proper identification to the bank clerk.

in bitcoin this is simple and verifiable by everyone and it is called signing a message with the private key, and it can not be forged like regular IDs.


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: Qartada on April 04, 2017, 06:42:41 AM
why are we even still arguing about this!

it is very simple. if you go to the bank and want to close your account for example they will ask you some identification, you can't tell the bank clerk i am me and you have to take my word for it, or say i showed my ID to some random guy and he approved i am me! you have to show proper identification to the bank clerk.

in bitcoin this is simple and verifiable by everyone and it is called signing a message with the private key, and it can not be forged like regular IDs.
All Satoshi would need to do is prove that he mined block zero (this would show that he accessed Bitcoin before anyone else and therefore was Satoshi).  It's pretty easy and Wright could just do it but he claims to have to "jump through hoops" to verify his identity.

Satoshi is better off as pseudonymous.  He doesn't need the attention.


Title: Re: Craig wright claims as satoshi?
Post by: kiklo on April 04, 2017, 06:47:12 AM
I would believe Craig is Batman, before I would believe he is satoshi.  :P

https://metvnetwork.s3.amazonaws.com/YZDlO-1443470703-78-list_items-adamwest_batman_1.jpg

 
8)