Bitcoin Forum

Economy => Reputation => Topic started by: Hueristic on April 09, 2017, 07:12:06 PM



Title: Does QuestionAuthority deserve Neg trust?
Post by: Hueristic on April 09, 2017, 07:12:06 PM
Quotes:

There's nothing wrong with a pump-n-dump scheme. Bitcoin has been used as a p-n-d many times. I've made a lot of money manipulating stupid people into paying more for something than it's worth (I used to work in real estate where it's a normal practice). Bob/Patrick/Steven or whatever took advantage of stupid people, so what? That's a normal day at Century 21 or CB Richard Ellis. People are supposed to be noble and honest because it's cryptocurrency? Oh, please. What screws most people is their own greed. A fool and his money are soon parted is the name of the game.


I never had to manipulate people in bitcoinland. There's so many people doing it here it's almost cliché. I did make a shit ton of coins shilling for BitSwift (Timeshare coin) under another nick but that doesn't count because I don't consider the altcoin crowd as real crypto people. Bitcoin people want to make a better world by screwing the establishment and big banking. Altcoin people just want to make a quick buck because they're butthurt over not being bitcoin early adopters. Altcoin "get rich quickers" get what they deserve.


Link To my quote.


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=896480.msg18522763#msg18522763


Title: Re: Does QuestionAuthority deserve Neg trust?
Post by: actmyname on April 09, 2017, 07:59:26 PM
Yes. A negative trust would be perfectly justified in this case.

Archive 1 (https://archive.is/fqiUL#selection-4693.94-4693.192)
Archive 2 (https://archive.is/hvCV9#selection-5153.106-5153.282)



Why trust someone who says that they manipulate other people? Someone who shills for coins to make a quick buck, justifying it with others' greed? The self-incrimination simply publicizes the fact and tells us not to trust them.


Title: Re: Does QuestionAuthority deserve Neg trust?
Post by: Quickseller on April 09, 2017, 10:23:09 PM
I am fairly certain that he used to be a cop (worked in law enforcement), not in the real estate industry.

I also know for a fact that he likes to troll people, and would not be surprised if that is what he is doing.

Either way, he does not trade here, and really does not even post in any of the sections that display users' trust.


Title: Re: Does QuestionAuthority deserve Neg trust?
Post by: QuestionAuthority on April 10, 2017, 04:47:03 AM
I am fairly certain that he used to be a cop (worked in law enforcement), not in the real estate industry.

I also know for a fact that he likes to troll people, and would not be surprised if that is what he is doing.

Either way, he does not trade here, and really does not even post in any of the sections that display users' trust.

LOL - ding, ding, ding - We have a winner Johnny. Tell them what they won.

Point one - correct.

Point two - correct. But I don't just like to troll. I love to troll, especially dumbasses. That's why I've never been able to troll you Quickseller, you're not a dumbass.

Point three - correct.

ROFL - I didn't even know what timeshare coin was until I read that thread. Isn't the OP in that BobSurplus thread a great read though? Very well written. The author must be an English major.

You're right, I almost never post outside of Bitcoin Main Discussion.


Title: Re: Does QuestionAuthority deserve Neg trust?
Post by: Quickseller on April 10, 2017, 05:09:43 AM
Point two - correct. But I don't just like to troll. I love to troll, especially dumbasses. That's why I've never been able to troll you Quickseller, you're not a dumbass.
hooray for me! lol


Title: Re: Does QuestionAuthority deserve Neg trust?
Post by: Lauda on April 10, 2017, 06:01:33 AM
Why trust someone who says that they manipulate other people?
Oh boy.

Someone who shills for coins to make a quick buck, justifying it with others' greed?
I just wanted to drop by (even though this is already pretty much over) to state that if you wanted to neg. rate shills, we'd be looking at over 100 000 accounts being neg. rated. Good luck with that plan considering that the forum indirectly supports both hacked accounts and shilling for scam accounts. ::)


Title: Re: Does QuestionAuthority deserve Neg trust?
Post by: QuestionAuthority on April 10, 2017, 04:11:40 PM
Why trust someone who says that they manipulate other people?
Oh boy.

Someone who shills for coins to make a quick buck, justifying it with others' greed?
I just wanted to drop by (even though this is already pretty much over) to state that if you wanted to neg. rate shills, we'd be looking at over 100 000 accounts being neg. rated. Good luck with that plan considering that the forum indirectly supports both hacked accounts and shilling for scam accounts. ::)

Never could troll you either. You're far too bright and level headed. Logic and reason seem to be lost on most people here though. I can forgive the obvious 12 year olds posting here because they have no life experience or knowledge of the world and how it works, it's the obvious older posters that really need to be trolled. I'm pretty sure they get trolled IRL too. LOL


Title: Re: Does QuestionAuthority deserve Neg trust?
Post by: Quickseller on April 10, 2017, 05:40:05 PM
Why trust someone who says that they manipulate other people?
Oh boy.

Someone who shills for coins to make a quick buck, justifying it with others' greed?
I just wanted to drop by (even though this is already pretty much over) to state that if you wanted to neg. rate shills, we'd be looking at over 100 000 accounts being neg. rated. Good luck with that plan considering that the forum indirectly supports both hacked accounts and shilling for scam accounts. ::)

Never could troll you either. You're far too bright and level headed.
Lol, I am not sure you actually think I am smart anymore.

It looks like you are trolling everyone in this thread.


Title: Re: Does QuestionAuthority deserve Neg trust?
Post by: Lauda on April 10, 2017, 05:48:39 PM
Never could troll you either. You're far too bright and level headed. Logic and reason seem to be lost on most people here though. I can forgive the obvious 12 year olds posting here because they have no life experience or knowledge of the world and how it works, it's the obvious older posters that really need to be trolled. I'm pretty sure they get trolled IRL too. LOL
QS thinks you're trolling again. I don't know what to believe anymore. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Lol, I am not sure you actually think I am smart anymore.

It looks like you are trolling everyone in this thread.
So, where are your pitchforks? That's what you used to do in cases in which you weren't biased at all. :-X


Title: Re: Does QuestionAuthority deserve Neg trust?
Post by: ibminer on April 10, 2017, 06:19:18 PM
Looks like an exciting circle jerk you all have going here.  ;D

http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/587/276/24c.jpg


Title: Re: Does QuestionAuthority deserve Neg trust?
Post by: QuestionAuthority on April 10, 2017, 07:31:41 PM
Why trust someone who says that they manipulate other people?
Oh boy.

Someone who shills for coins to make a quick buck, justifying it with others' greed?
I just wanted to drop by (even though this is already pretty much over) to state that if you wanted to neg. rate shills, we'd be looking at over 100 000 accounts being neg. rated. Good luck with that plan considering that the forum indirectly supports both hacked accounts and shilling for scam accounts. ::)

Never could troll you either. You're far too bright and level headed.
Lol, I am not sure you actually think I am smart anymore.

It looks like you are trolling everyone in this thread.

Well, the threads already here, may as well have some fun. The verifiable truth is that I don't post anywhere in a trust thread, I don't sell anything here or buy anything here (because I don't trust anyone here) and I don't have to care what my trust rating is because I don't use it. I kind of like it actually. One of my favorite posters here was TerryTibbs he had a horrible trust rating and was labeled as a scammer back in the scammer tag days. I thought he was one of the smartest, nicest people I ever talked to so I'm in good company.