Bitcoin Forum

He launched a bounty campaign paid in Bitcoin that will take a month on 7th May 2017, he said that he will pay everyone 7th June 2017, NOTHING, at that date, he did not even completed spreedsheets, and until now, he said that he will pay us on Thursday 15th 2017, NOTHING.
I also want to add that he refused 90% of social media bounties, with no explanations about the reason.
Link to his profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=721115
Link to his thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1905333.0

well try to private message him and see if he replies back if not then we might have to give him negative trust because he's making everyone waste their time submitting blogs and media articles on there accounts  ::)

I guess you (OP) is one of OneGram's participants? You didn't get any payment until now and you using new account to criticize him?

---

Oh well, you joined in a risky campaign without any escrow

---

There are 2 other managers besides jamal, what happened with them?

They turned off. Only I am here trying to fix things and listening users blaming me ...

I'd just like to state 90% were indeed refused but I've went through the accounts and it's pretty obvious these 90% are fake accounts or accounts built only with the sole purpose of joining bounty campaigns.

If anything, you're giving the company a bad image with your useless fake Twitter/Facebook accounts.

I'm not merely stating they gave the company a bad image.

I'm merely laughing at how users actually complain when they know their accounts are fake/completely useless.

90% of them actually didn't promote the company, that's it.

My account was too rejected and I don't mind if it had happened when the campaign started or atleast in the first week. The list was updated after the end of the campaign and then we all got to know that we were rejected. This should be done at the start and not at the end.

I definitely agree with you here.

Campaign managers shouldn't be taking on work they can't handle, users should be accepted / rejected right at the start.

Letting users retweet the whole campaign time (even if completely useless accounts) and rejecting them at the end isn't the way to go.

Most of the times this is not up to them though, whoever is behind OneGram most likely was the one who requested Jamalaezaz to be strict on the accepted users.

I agree there. That should be clarified as there was a lot that happened during the campaign. First it got closed due to some personal issues and then 90% were rejected. Also, the payment has been delayed till now. Hope these issues get resolved soon.

That's complete bullshit, and I've seen similar stunts pulled in other campaigns where people will wear the signature to apply, and then after nearly an entire week they find out they got rejected.  Meanwhile the campaign gets free advertising.   That just happened to me for a couple days when I was applying to the let's think about the future campaign.   And right now I haven't been accepted by Edwardard for the one I'm applying for now.  He's on the ball though; some managers most assuredly are not.

1. If you're going to wear the signature, first figure out if you've been accepted or not. If the manager hasn't stated you've been accepted wearing it for a week is at least ridiculous (from your end).
I do though think managers should take 24-48 hours maximum to accept/reject new participants (except for special occasions). This way these type of situations would no longer happen.

2. I could agree on the campaign getting free advertising on the signature campaigns. I completely disagree on the social marketing (Twitter and Facebook) part though. I've only seen the accounts that were used on the OneGram so I'm merely stating on what I've seen from one campaign but they are just completely useless and accounts that merely retweet every single bounty campaign available. If you're looking for campaigns to be fair with you start being fair with them by actually using your real account.

Since this is related to me now I would like to answer it. So how would like to receive an answer? PM or public.

---

Guess I will go public then. In my campaign, I never push campaign participants to wear signatures or avatar prior to my message accepting them.

You are free to wear or not wear signatures before my message but manager shouldn't be held responsible in that case until he accepts you officially. Hope you get the difference.

Yes that's the way to do it.Otherwise you can always let them know that they have been rejected.

Many managers expect members to wear signatures before applying,if someone's already in a campaign and should they wish to apply,they can always message the campaign managers.

Op's case,he's still replying and he shouldn't be blamed since all you fools took a risk by advertising for free without a back up escrow.Campaign manager did mention it.

Though the onegram campaign is in a terrible mess, I think it is too early for a scam accusation. Yes, he did fail to keep the timeframe, and as he says, the other two managers have left, he must be trying hard to make up everything. As long as he does not deny his responsibility or stop interacting with participants, a scam is not a appropriate word. Even I am personally not happy with his management technique, and perhaps the most vocal critic  ;D of him in the onegram thread, but still, I would differ with calling everything as scam, at least as of now.

Ehhh...didn't really care if I got an answer from you or not, but apparently I struck a nerve.  It's your loss anyway.  Keep accepting people who use English as their 7th language and see what kind of great advertising you get.  Posts that absolutely no one wants to read.  You may not like my posts, you may not agree with them, but don't say I need to improve them and to try again.  My posts are better constructed and more interesting than 95% of shit on this forum and 99.99% more interesting than other campaigners.  You'd be lucky to have someone like me promoting your thingamajig.  All those people who applied in that thread were utter morons.  At least you didn't accept them.  But lots of luck to you.

And you didn't push anyone to wear the advertising beforehand.  I take back that part of what I said.  That was a misunderstanding on my part which I'll take ownership of.

I've only ever been in a campaign with Edwardard, and he's been very good.  But I do read threads of other sig campaigns, and I was extremely briefly in the QTUM campaign run by BlackMambaPH.  I'm of the opinion that campaigns aren't selective enough.  Not even close, though it's a very good thing that some campaigns are only accepting Sr. member and above.

HI guys
Me and Davide72 from italian local section have been scammed too by jamal and dimitri by taas. They didn't paid our translation and moderation bounties.

They didn't answer our questions, though a chat room created to solve this issue today but  both quitted, jamal without any sentence. Dimitri said all bounties paid and discuss matters with jamal

A total amount of 4500 taas was our bounty reward, they takes it for himselfes..... i call this  theft

If im wrong why don't he come to us and told clear

i read this thread , i want you to know

I used my real account and followed the rules but still my status was marked rejected. Din't feel like arguing as it was just 1 week of free publicity that I did for the campaign. I'm wondering about the status of my translation that I completed as it would be really unfair if last moment the manager says you are not eligible for the payment. Work as well as the wait for a month would be wasted then.


I have seen this happening with signature campaigns too where they add rules just before making the payments. They accept participants, participants work for a week and then rules changed to receive the payment. This makes the campaign and the manager look bad.


Did you approach the dev team on slack or any other channel? I'm shocked that this happened with you. Jamal was handling the Ethbits campaign too but I got paid for my work. Hope your issue is resolved soon.

This is a breaking news for us, we never ever been advised about this. As told we created a chat room with team and jamal but they quitted. We are posting here and on the official thread than we'l post on slack and telegram.

we're thinking to speak with a lawyer next monday

Jamal was not on ethbits, i did local translation and have been paid by another team member (julien)

Does it mean onegram team don't pay or jama not pay.If onegram not pay , onegram will make the name of islam bad but if jamal not pay I will never join the campaign managed by him.

 me and Parma we would like to get our  translating bounty  soon

this is Jamal

https://vgy.me/lfLAnF.jpg

I already decide this I will never join any campaign which is managed by Jamal because he is really one of worst person here managing campaigns and rejecting members at the end of campaign its never been fair

I was also the participant of OneGram and I have also not got payment but I think Jamal has done his job and any delay in payment is because of Onegram team.There were 3 managers and they made it clear in op itself that there is no escrow for funds.Unfortunatly here is no one from OneGram team to clesrify things

I've stated that countless time that whenever someone reply to me he must quote my previous message. I am getting hundred of messages at a day and I can't remember previous messages.

Anyway. Devide sent me a message "Italian Translation" and I replied "No thanks" I thought he's asking for a translation job on another project I am managing.. that was a misunderstanding happened because he didn't quoted my previous reply..

Anyway . I've just replied him and clarified the issue.. I was not the one who paid TaaS bounties and you knew that from the day one..

hahahaha you should mention the topic

The way this is going, it's already putting a stain on the image of Onegram as an Islamic coin whether the fault is from Jamal or from the company. Whichever way, I guess that caveat on the first page of the Onegram campaign of not using an escrow is a pointer to what is happening now. None of them from that company wanted to take responsibility from the beginning if things went wrong as it is now. Jamal should have had the funds escrowed or held them himself just the way Yahoo does. So, Jamal should share in the blame. It's partly his fault.

davide was asking for bounty payment, wich one? italian translation, he knows very well who Davide is and wich ANN he translated. he done the same when we created a telegram chat wit him and dimitri (taas).
Jamal is an impostor , he made some traps and cheats. he done very bad work with taas . when issue solved you'll know how

I can't understand what Islam has to do with this onegram coin. The coin has nothing to do with Islam or nor is it Islamic in any way, they claimed the coin is Sharia compliant, which many muslims will differ too. Just by someone claiming something to be sharia compliant does not make it Islamic in any way  ;D
Tomorrow if I slap someone in the name of the president of America, will the president be blamed for it or I am the cunt  ::) to be held responsible?

So, what actually are you trying to clarify?  Has onegram refused to pay you for your campaign observation?
These recurr verbalizing questions should be plainly answered so that campaign participants would omit blaming you.

Guys do  you know jamal ?
NO? neither i, im SURE i don't! i never worked with him i none one of my Bitcointalk project !!!
but he claims the contrary

but the layer, cheater and robbery says something that he can't prove

MY BEST FRIEND????   ???  ???  ???  ???  ???

https://vgy.me/RhNqZG.jpg


Do you know TAAS TEAM who is your "trusted"  campaign manager?  :o

This is only the beginning of the trap, stay tuned other coming

Sigh..
A lot of problem happened,and he's really a trouble maker.
His campaign always ended with questionable ending,
And the participants always rejected for unknown reason,even thought they accepted them in the first and second week.
After that he'll reject them.
And lack of comunication with other team member,make it even worst.
Corruption? It might be

Jamal run with 25k of monaco bounty.

Old strategy of him " Reject participants at the end of campaign. "
Thatis is his best strategy with delay payment.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1924985.1540 this is monaco card problem

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1905333.580 onegram case the same

Already answered this in Monaco thread:


only 43 users out of 250+ disqualified. and anyone can see why I've rejected them and  BTW I am still open to listen those who think they disqualified by mistake or with wrong reason (already changed 3 user's status from rejected to accepted)

If you say that your strategy is the best, Why there always crowd at the end of the campaign, many participants complaining. My article also rejected at the end of the payment date. You make participants waiting. At the beginning of the first week you can reject or disqualify participants. I just give suggestion. I don't follow any campaign of your managing anymore but I feel dissapointed seeing your act. If you reject at the first week so the participants will stop campaigning, no problem after that. I know your strategy to make more participants but don't want to pay more.

Probably he gets your bounty. Its likely that is his strategy to confuse people and gets to ran-off with your tokens.

I agree with this Statement
i was rejected at the end of the campaign by accusing me of multiple accounts without any evidence and clarity,really disappointing  ???
if you Mr. Jamalz accused me for that reason .i want to ask for proof that I am a multi account with his allegations ???

Why don't you ask Jamal for proof of having a multiple accounts, if he has proven you have multiple account would you take back the responses you made here? The guys is just working for the team, if the team hasn't given you the bounties you can always ask the dev if they have already paid jamal. The way I see it is that Jamal can't give you the bounties unless the dev team already sent the payment to him.

This is just misunderstanding and wrong checking by Mr. Jamalz
He has given me an explanation of this misunderstanding,so i am quite satisfied with the answer. Jamalz

Jamal and suporters always accused participanst using multiple accounts. That's the way they answer. I delete my red trust to jamal because he in the end paid the bounty reward. But the fact the payment is lower than the stated in the ann. It's OK It is just lesson to bounty participants. You see that  monaco and onegram show the end of crowd bounty WHy? Why? That's  the same manager, the same case. He is not scammer but he is unfair. If he sees that some participants using multiple account just easy to mark red at the first week. No problem after that. isn't it.

Red mark isn't a sanction for a user with multiple accounts because those account with red trust are just going to be thrown away and they could  again create another account. A better sanction is to disqualify the account for it not to be in a campaign again, those accounts are luckier that Jamal didnt add a red mark along with disqualification else they can't join to campaigns not managed by jamal.

Ahh...Sorry mate you are not in DT2.

I have heard a lot of complains about Jamal I know he is sincere but he gets fucked when he don't use escrow..He should use one.

Simple way to keep annoyed from this. Don't participate any campign he managed. Or rather contact the project Dev to don't hire this person. That would be the thing to do.

You are DT nothing, idiot. :D

Cheap people try to cut any costs, thus avoid using escrow.

That is no solution of any kind. Jamal should either learn how to properly manage campaigns or stop managing them completely.

Im going to watch on how much the community will suffer cos this dude is already running multiple signature while his previous campaign are still having problems. I guess he likes to create confusion to steal and people can only say that they are missing pay-outs hehe

I'm just going to give my 2cents, take it or leave it.

As a newbie, Jamal was the only one to even talk to me. I was allowed to do a translation.
Later, Jamal received a complaint that translation was not good. I got disqualified.

I messaged Jamal and explained that I am a native and that complaint was false.
He listened to my arguments and then he changed my status again to accepted.

Although Bounties for the campaign have not yet been distributed, I believe that if
someone he disqualifies talks to him about it and explains his argument, he will find that
Jamal is a reasonable man.

So I don't know... to me atleast, he doesn't seem like a bad campaign manager at all...

he i not the only camp manager , you can definitely choose to work for other camp manager.