Bitcoin Forum

A group of BTC and ETH colleagues and investors have just watched 'the future of Bitcoin'. Especially the self proclaimed inventor of Bitcoin himself Craig Wright. What a sickening and shoddy performance. And we are supposed to believe that this man after all his ranting and money problems is the inventor of the greatest living currency tool of freedom in  2000 years.

What's your point in still discussing this? This has been discussed plenty of times on the forum and no one believes that that poser is not Satoshi Nakamoto. If he was, then he could have already signed messages from all known addresses of Satoshi or he could have went online on the forums using his account here. But he hasn't and he refuses to do it.

he could well be satoshi after falling down the stairs. there's no doubt he has some type of impulse control problem. i think his head's gonna explode before he does some real damage. it is kinda weird how all these odious people gather together.

imo better to not give him any more publicity than what he's getting. He's not Satoshi, let's move on.

The point of this thread is CW turned up today still proclaiming himself as Satoshi. Do you think that it right? Do you? Really?

Just ignore Craig Wright. When he gets tired of proclaiming himself as Satoshi, he will just disappear.
So don't bother yourself, now that CW is again with his mood of being Satoshi.  ;D

Is this really a big deal? Ignore and let him do what he want.

"I am the creator of Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto, I swear. 100%. I can prove it." - He must removed the "can" to make period of this speculation. Tired of his claiming with insufficient proofs.

Doesn't matter if he's Satoshi or not, now...does it?

But Dr. Wright wants on chain scaling and big blocks (as did Satoshi)
so for that reason, I support his position.

LOL, this is not news nor breaking :D
he was never even remotely close to being Satoshi Nakamoto. the day he started behaving in a shady an suspicious manner it became clear that he has no claims. it was all a plan to come to this day.

Is this the first time you're hearing of the dude? We already talked about him a lot about a year ago and how phony he was being. This isn't news to most people who have been here since 2016 and it's blatantly obvious that the guy was lying his ass off and there is zero credibility for his claims.

I don't know why this is being used as a topic right now because this is something a lot of people, including myself, have talked about and come to a consensus that the guy is not Satoshi Nakamoto and is using the obscurity as a means of getting popularity for doing nothing.

we shouldn't even be talking about him, heck we shouldn't even be using his name with Satoshi Nakamoto in the same sentence! the scam he pulled doesn't get any more obvious that this and if anyone still has doubts then they don't understand how bitcoin works.

Oh God here we go. Now it turns into a block size debate. Just leave it alone. It's being fixed finally.

Ok, he's not Satoshi. Did he sign a message? No. Did he move funds? No. Shit or get off the pot Craig. This has to get him paid somehow or he wouldn't do it.

Until we scale, everything is about the block size debate.

That's essentially the only issue that matters.

There is no blocksize debate, there never was. Its all about who controls the development and direction of Bitcoin.

Blocksize is just the rallying call for corporate takeover of Bitcoin.

LOL @ all of these breaking news clickbait threads. Kind of annoying, but also funny at the same time.

Link would help.

i think he is pointing to "the future of bitcoin conference" that started ~13 hours ago.
here is the link to its livestream that i found on google: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAcOnvOVquo

This con artist clearly just wants to find a way to scam people. I wouldn't be surprised if he claimed ownership of all bitcoin. If he truly is S.N. he would be able to PROVE it.

i really love what Charlie Lee (the creator and the head developer of litecoin) did in response to CW's false claims.
he simply signed a message from his publicly known keys and posted it on his twitter for EVERYONE to see and verify with their clients in a second!

he is still trolling CW too. latest tweet was:
"I pray to Satoshi that Craig Wright is not Satoshi."
;D

Not this crap again, Craig Wright is not Satoshi. He knows it, we all know it. There is no need to keep bringing up this topic, it's been done to death.

I enjoyed this too, Charlie Lee is a funny guy at times.

Turned that video off after a few minutes, couldn't believe after all the hype from last time, all he needs to do is prove he's satoshi, so simple but he refuses to do so. Go figure.

Edit: Christ, just turned the video back on, thought he wanted out the spotlight back in 2015?  :P

Why does this happen, after every few days he is not and can never Be satoshi. For the very simple fact he would not be roaming so freely that he is today, the government would have taken him long inside, he can try his level best but he can't fool me or the others who truly believe that he is not satoshi. I don't get it why would someone do this, to satoshi who sacrificed himself to save the future Bitcoins. Shame on this guy, he should be made to take the walk of shame (referring to got here).

This is not even suppose to be up for discussion. Anyone who believes CW is satoshi is apparently as dumb as CW himself.

How many Satoshi Nakamotos were there until now?)

We need a proof so solid ,that its almost impossible to have one

It is very funny to see how he proclaimed to the world that he was the real Satoshi Nakamoto. But in the end he just made himself a fool when he failed to provide evidence that he is the real Satoshi Nakamoto. He just wanted to patent bitcoin so he can be very rich himself. And since he has lost the game he wants to come back by making a threat to the development in bitcoin. He is so desperate that he will do anything so he can come back to game. But in the end nobody believed him and once again he made himself a fool to the eyes of the public once again.

I don't care who is or who is not.

I m exited and see what solutions will come from any, helping make bitcoin that big that it cannot fail any more. And it was always my speech, it must be on chain first...

The comments are more revealing than the video.

Those were questions not comments! :P

~

Anyway, carry on men I must return to my work building the "financial sovereignty mechanism for the world."

Well it does not matter if Satoshi Nakamoto is Craig Wright. Just like other groundbreaking and revolutionary inventions out there, most of its users does not give a d*mn who invented it. As long as the users can use it freely, the inventor will not matter to them.

Is it good to know who invented the thing/s you're using? YES
Is it necessary? NO

You do understand that bitcoin is under threat? So you think sitting back with your head in the sand is the solution?

I think Jon knows very well, that Craig is NOT Satoshi Nakamoto.

As for me - this is a very interesting topic. May be someone can find this topic to be foolish or useless, but it may be for those who are there for a long period of time. But I was a Newbie  just in May of this year and don't know about Bitcoin, Blockchain, Craig Wright andat lots of things at all. So it was interesting and informative to know about that guy due  to all this discussion. So, I am very thankful to everyone who was discussing this topic. Because for me, you may be laughing, but it is a new information. So thank you, guys)))

never though of using the search field on the bottom right page?

Cointelegraph has reported  the story, and doesn't give a good write up for Craig Wright. It says he makes a lot of "claims", intimating they are all a load of crap. It says besides claiming he's Satoshi he "claims" he's controls a mining pool with 20% of all hash power.

https://cointelegraph.com/news/craig-wright-rants-against-bitcoin-decentralization

I just saw the recent speech by Craig Wright on the so called "Future of Bitcoin" with Jon Matonis and other "nChain" members. I saw a lot of contradictions claimed by Wright, like saying his idea of massive block sizes is better and how the blockchain doesn't matter and you don't need to hold it, yet pretending if you don't hold the blockchain yourself you can be certain your money isn't manipulated. You can't make this up.

Just never mind the news, this subject has become a perfect topic for signature show offs. without a signed message from any address within the first 1000 bitcoin addresses (blocks) the whole world saying he's Satoshi it won't matter.