Bitcoin Forum

With the developing scenario in this world, we could aspect a full fledged war which we haven't seen for some decades.
This situation can easily turn into a regional or world war.
Let's (pray this doesn't happen) guess who will be the first to strike.

I see US provoking NK to firing the first missile. US will just stand prepared on the side and provoke the NK and we know that NK is capable of being provoked quite easily and with NK provoked into attacking first, US will have justification in the peoples eyes to return the fire full force.

That is the main event and trump is prepared for this knowing that they can defeat North Korea with their High tech war machines . 
However i don't want this war to happen and it might be the fire fpr the other countries to start a war against others .

Aside from that situation a trash talking between north korea and the uinted states. The current situation between china and india is a much more serious. China is now really doing something sending some troops to their borders and also have said that they are going to attack when its necessary

China have given an ultimate to India to withdraw it's troop form Doklam. And if not fulfiled, China would be glad to experiment it's new toys over India.
That situation would surely deteriorate the power situation there. A defeated India would be easily bullied by Pakistan.

I don't think that this will be resulting into a "full fledged war because they are also thinking what it will be or how will it be affecting their countrymen. I think this will be just like a cold war where only words and taunts are thrown to each other. More importantly, we don't need to expect a war, let us just focus on what we can do to ourselves.

That wouldn't be a good choice for them as India's military power is huge. They have a lot of long range ballistic missiles, their own missile defense system and a lot of nuclear subs. A real war between these two would end with no winners.

I think that The United States are most likely to attack. They like to be the aggressor and Trump is very easily offended.

Likely there is not going to be a full fledged war. But hypocritical countries like North Korea and India who boasts about their power but are worthless can be the first ones to strike. Though they wouldn't last long, but can cause serious civilian damage to others and themselves. 

No one attacks first, I hope!

I really don't know who is telling the truth because we all know that USA is so used to in making up stories so that they will become the face of telling the truth even though North Korea is the one initiating it because maybe USA is using media to show case that North Korea is bombing Guam, who knows. But if this all news is true I think North Korea will be the one to first move because USA is only at a defensive mode.

You missed a voting option. You should also add none of the above or no one. That's what I think, no one will make the first move. Its all just a bunch of blah blah blah.

That's easy: USA, they have 0 tolerance.

I don't think it would lead to a world war if north korea strikes first. Even their staunch ally china hasn't approved of all their missile tests that seem to be a taunt to the west. If north korea mives first, they're pretty much alone and would be easily defeated.

I do not think that in the modern world, a global war will begin, because it unifies all modern technologies that are not beneficial to many rulers. Most likely there will be an information war or the US can inflict a few blows.

Information war already begins. Maybe not a Real war, but something like that

I don't see anyone "firing first" in a way as to start a major war. Even North Korea isn't that reckless.

The first will not start a nuclear war no one. Conventional war too, no one wants to start. Trump has no support in the community, and that means he will not dare to action. Most likely the war will be limited to economic methods and information technology.

Trump has been seeking to attack North Korea all along and now this inexperienced douche bag gives him the chance to do just that, I totally support the overthrow of the Kim Jon Un dynasty, i believe that they have been in power for far a long time and the world will definitely be a peaceful place when He is not in it. He has been a tyrant ever since he assumed the throne when his father died.

It is going to be USA. If they say that they don't want to tolerate N.Korea as nuclear power, they will make it somehow that N.Korea is not nuclear power. Yes they have nukes, and ballistic missiles, but it is not modern technology. It is unclear if they ICBM's are reliable. I expect soon that they attack them to stop N.Korea from becoming fully nuclear and ballistic power.

USA us not falling power, where did you get that from? They are every where. They still are doing many bad things across the world and with their actions they provoke others. Syria, Ukraine that seems like US wish to be all around Russia, that is a clear provocation!
Russia is not USSR nostalgic, for what they need that revenge that you talk about? They are strong and they have rich country, they can participate in battle for power in the world and when I hear what US politicians are talking I'm amazed with so much stupidity on one place, they are going around the world kill innocent people just to be able to push in their companies and take everything valuable from poor countries, Russia don't do this kind of things.
China is not expending country, they are big already. I don't know where do you find this information's for opening this thread. Its ridiculous and far from truth.

I think no-one. North Korea is probably bluffing that they will actually use nuclear weapons to gain leverage in negotiations. They get global attention, and are less likely to be overthrown in the process.

I doubt the North Koreans will initiate any attacks on the USA, and there is no way that Trump will attack first, Even though he wants the Kin Jong Un out he will not start this and kill North Korean civilians will be casualties of the war, He seems to care more about them than their own President.

I really dont care who willstrike first...
But when these event happens the human race is doomed...
.
I will rather hear "who will intervene first?"
The one who will have all the guts to stop nations from destroying each other...

If there is going to be a physical confrontation, then I am 99.9% sure that it will be Donald Trump who is going to start it. Anyway, I am thankful to god that Hillary was defeated in 2016. Else, a third world war would have been started already.

At this stage , i don't think that will be any strikes. Because technologies nowadays have brought USA in a higher position. They are almost everywhere in the world and they are also not loosing their power. And i also wish that this will not happen.

I'm pretty sure the USA will start it, and maybe they already did. But the thing with the US is (if you subscribe to the conspiracies) is that it will look like they're the victim and blurt it out to the media then after getting sympathy from their allies and the whole world they will send in the cavalry and bring down the hammer until the US gets what they want. Leaving the soldiers dead on both side and the pockets of politicians a bit more fatter

The US will never strike the first blow. They can provoke to then start military action against someone

Putin is insane and puts all Russia into insanity. And unlike North Korea, Putin acts (the capture of the Crimea, an attempt to seize Donbass in Ukraine). And in their TV news a mad TV presenter threatened to turn the US into radioactive ash.

It is usually all the times the USA to strike first, but not without having first staged a false flag attack.