Title: dot.tk Post by: smeagol on June 10, 2013, 07:55:32 PM DOT.TK SPYWARE ALERT
I visited dot.tk on my company computer and it detected spyware. Not sure if real or not but be careful! :) Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: nimda on June 10, 2013, 07:57:32 PM Can you be more specific? That's a legitimate registrar.
Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: r3wt on June 10, 2013, 08:01:10 PM Can you be more specific? That's a legitimate registrar. probably a competitor such as subdomain.com or co.nf, co.nr etc. i just visited dot tk and nothing from chrome, Avast Internet Security or Malware Bytes Pro. Its very possible however that a hacker injected malicious code into the form by some groundbreaking sql injection, but if thats the case it was obviously caught and contained by dot. tk Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: jackjack on June 10, 2013, 08:02:55 PM Can you be more specific? That's a legitimate registrar. ThisTitle: Re: dot.tk Post by: neurobox on June 10, 2013, 08:06:06 PM It's a legit registrar, but it's subdomains are frequently abused for spyware. WOT and the likes have cordoned off the whole .tk domain as an elevated risk of a threat, which seems more lazy than fair.
Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: r3wt on June 10, 2013, 08:08:15 PM Can you be more specific? That's a legitimate registrar. Thisin his defense although dot tk has cleaned up their act, in the past they were notorious for allowing scam customers. there are still many dot tk paid domains that point directly to spyware and banner farms. they dont terminate paid accounts for abuse of TOS. that being said the claims of dot.tk(their oficial registrar site) being infected with malware i didn't get nothing when i went their in chrome. normally chrome will alert followed by Avast Int Security a few seconds later. usually a scam with Malware Bytes Pro reveals details about the mode of delivery. i've found that 99 percent of the time it is cross site scripting, meaning a page has been compromised by spyware Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: mprep on June 10, 2013, 08:09:36 PM I don't know. I used dot.tk domain services and I have never had any malware problems. It's like saying that a domain registrar is full of malware because he registered a .com domain that has a infected website associated with it.
Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: neurobox on June 10, 2013, 08:34:54 PM .tk is a bit different than other TLDs in that the one registrar has a lock on the market, and gives out domains without strong traceability. Try getting a .ca anonymously, then tell me which TLD a script kiddie would try first.
Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: nimda on June 10, 2013, 08:36:06 PM All this is true, but the OP specifically said dot.tk, and I'd be rather surprised to see the registrar itself distributing malware.
Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: mprep on June 10, 2013, 08:38:17 PM All this is true, but the OP specifically said dot.tk, and I'd be rather surprised to see the registrar itself distributing malware. Yeah, that's highly unlikely.Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: neurobox on June 10, 2013, 09:29:55 PM All this is true, but the OP specifically said dot.tk, and I'd be rather surprised to see the registrar itself distributing malware. Yeah, that's highly unlikely.Yep, that's my point. The OP's company computer was probably running something that works indiscriminately, as I've seen done. That said, WOT does now make the distinction, and dot.tk itself checks out as "Trustworthy." The other possibility is that you are running malware that is hosts-redirecting your attempt to access dot.tk, redirecting to a spoof server that does have malware on it... do you get 77.243.130.175 when you ping dot.tk? Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: ranlo on June 11, 2013, 04:30:19 AM All this is true, but the OP specifically said dot.tk, and I'd be rather surprised to see the registrar itself distributing malware. Yeah, that's highly unlikely.Yep, that's my point. The OP's company computer was probably running something that works indiscriminately, as I've seen done. That said, WOT does now make the distinction, and dot.tk itself checks out as "Trustworthy." The other possibility is that you are running malware that is hosts-redirecting your attempt to access dot.tk, redirecting to a spoof server that does have malware on it... do you get 77.243.130.175 when you ping dot.tk? The second is what I'd think it is -- if the issue is with visiting dot.tk itself. They used to be a lot worse than they are now; while still used by a lot of scammers/hackers, they're not nearly as bad. Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: jackjack on June 11, 2013, 08:01:38 AM All this is true, but the OP specifically said dot.tk, and I'd be rather surprised to see the registrar itself distributing malware. Yeah, that's highly unlikely.Yep, that's my point. The OP's company computer was probably running something that works indiscriminately, as I've seen done. That said, WOT does now make the distinction, and dot.tk itself checks out as "Trustworthy." The other possibility is that you are running malware that is hosts-redirecting your attempt to access dot.tk, redirecting to a spoof server that does have malware on it... do you get 77.243.130.175 when you ping dot.tk? The second is what I'd think it is -- if the issue is with visiting dot.tk itself. They used to be a lot worse than they are now; while still used by a lot of scammers/hackers, they're not nearly as bad. Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: ranlo on June 11, 2013, 08:05:16 AM All this is true, but the OP specifically said dot.tk, and I'd be rather surprised to see the registrar itself distributing malware. Yeah, that's highly unlikely.Yep, that's my point. The OP's company computer was probably running something that works indiscriminately, as I've seen done. That said, WOT does now make the distinction, and dot.tk itself checks out as "Trustworthy." The other possibility is that you are running malware that is hosts-redirecting your attempt to access dot.tk, redirecting to a spoof server that does have malware on it... do you get 77.243.130.175 when you ping dot.tk? The second is what I'd think it is -- if the issue is with visiting dot.tk itself. They used to be a lot worse than they are now; while still used by a lot of scammers/hackers, they're not nearly as bad. It's possible that the ratio is the same and that it's the fact that there's so many more people using TK's now that it doesn't "feel" the same. Kind of like if there's 1:100 rate of crime, you will feel that there's a lot more criminals when there's 100k people vs 1k, when really it's the same. Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: mprep on June 11, 2013, 09:02:26 AM All this is true, but the OP specifically said dot.tk, and I'd be rather surprised to see the registrar itself distributing malware. Yeah, that's highly unlikely.Yep, that's my point. The OP's company computer was probably running something that works indiscriminately, as I've seen done. That said, WOT does now make the distinction, and dot.tk itself checks out as "Trustworthy." The other possibility is that you are running malware that is hosts-redirecting your attempt to access dot.tk, redirecting to a spoof server that does have malware on it... do you get 77.243.130.175 when you ping dot.tk? The second is what I'd think it is -- if the issue is with visiting dot.tk itself. They used to be a lot worse than they are now; while still used by a lot of scammers/hackers, they're not nearly as bad. It's possible that the ratio is the same and that it's the fact that there's so many more people using TK's now that it doesn't "feel" the same. Kind of like if there's 1:100 rate of crime, you will feel that there's a lot more criminals when there's 100k people vs 1k, when really it's the same. Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: ranlo on June 11, 2013, 09:08:39 AM Well at least I'm trying to contribute by showing tyat not every .tk website is a scam/malware-overrun website. I get ya. I actually started up a few tk's on my own after doing research on them again. And I'm not a scammer/malware abuser, :p. Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: mprep on June 11, 2013, 09:12:37 AM Well at least I'm trying to contribute by showing tyat not every .tk website is a scam/malware-overrun website. I get ya. I actually started up a few tk's on my own after doing research on them again. And I'm not a scammer/malware abuser, :p. Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: ranlo on June 11, 2013, 09:18:38 AM Well at least I'm trying to contribute by showing tyat not every .tk website is a scam/malware-overrun website. I get ya. I actually started up a few tk's on my own after doing research on them again. And I'm not a scammer/malware abuser, :p. True, that's another good reason to use them, :). Also, the benefit of .com over .tk is solely about SEO. Other than that there are no differences. And that only matters because .tk is a country-based domain and .com is universal. Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: mprep on June 11, 2013, 09:28:55 AM Well at least I'm trying to contribute by showing tyat not every .tk website is a scam/malware-overrun website. I get ya. I actually started up a few tk's on my own after doing research on them again. And I'm not a scammer/malware abuser, :p. True, that's another good reason to use them, :). Also, the benefit of .com over .tk is solely about SEO. Other than that there are no differences. And that only matters because .tk is a country-based domain and .com is universal. Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: ranlo on June 11, 2013, 09:29:56 AM Well at least I'm trying to contribute by showing tyat not every .tk website is a scam/malware-overrun website. I get ya. I actually started up a few tk's on my own after doing research on them again. And I'm not a scammer/malware abuser, :p. True, that's another good reason to use them, :). Also, the benefit of .com over .tk is solely about SEO. Other than that there are no differences. And that only matters because .tk is a country-based domain and .com is universal. Actually, a lot of registrars give free privacy. The problem is if you're running an actual business (or really anything where you want authority) you need to leave it public as transparency (stores, authority blogs, etc.). Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: mprep on June 11, 2013, 09:33:00 AM Well at least I'm trying to contribute by showing tyat not every .tk website is a scam/malware-overrun website. I get ya. I actually started up a few tk's on my own after doing research on them again. And I'm not a scammer/malware abuser, :p. True, that's another good reason to use them, :). Also, the benefit of .com over .tk is solely about SEO. Other than that there are no differences. And that only matters because .tk is a country-based domain and .com is universal. Actually, a lot of registrars give free privacy. The problem is if you're running an actual business (or really anything where you want authority) you need to leave it public as transparency (stores, authority blogs, etc.). Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: jackjack on June 11, 2013, 09:34:12 AM Well at least I'm trying to contribute by showing tyat not every .tk website is a scam/malware-overrun website. I get ya. I actually started up a few tk's on my own after doing research on them again. And I'm not a scammer/malware abuser, :p. True, that's another good reason to use them, :). Also, the benefit of .com over .tk is solely about SEO. Other than that there are no differences. And that only matters because .tk is a country-based domain and .com is universal. Actually, a lot of registrars give free privacy. The problem is if you're running an actual business (or really anything where you want authority) you need to leave it public as transparency (stores, authority blogs, etc.). Any name to give? Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: ranlo on June 11, 2013, 09:35:42 AM Well at least I'm trying to contribute by showing tyat not every .tk website is a scam/malware-overrun website. I get ya. I actually started up a few tk's on my own after doing research on them again. And I'm not a scammer/malware abuser, :p. True, that's another good reason to use them, :). Also, the benefit of .com over .tk is solely about SEO. Other than that there are no differences. And that only matters because .tk is a country-based domain and .com is universal. Actually, a lot of registrars give free privacy. The problem is if you're running an actual business (or really anything where you want authority) you need to leave it public as transparency (stores, authority blogs, etc.). Just looked at your site, actually. If you change to a more static payment method (instead of random) I'd be willing to feature it on the BTC Faucet Rotator (http://coinfaucets.tk). Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: ranlo on June 11, 2013, 09:36:17 AM Well at least I'm trying to contribute by showing tyat not every .tk website is a scam/malware-overrun website. I get ya. I actually started up a few tk's on my own after doing research on them again. And I'm not a scammer/malware abuser, :p. True, that's another good reason to use them, :). Also, the benefit of .com over .tk is solely about SEO. Other than that there are no differences. And that only matters because .tk is a country-based domain and .com is universal. Actually, a lot of registrars give free privacy. The problem is if you're running an actual business (or really anything where you want authority) you need to leave it public as transparency (stores, authority blogs, etc.). Any name to give? Namecheap (http://www.namecheap.com/) is one of the bigger ones. Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: mprep on June 11, 2013, 09:41:54 AM Well at least I'm trying to contribute by showing tyat not every .tk website is a scam/malware-overrun website. I get ya. I actually started up a few tk's on my own after doing research on them again. And I'm not a scammer/malware abuser, :p. True, that's another good reason to use them, :). Also, the benefit of .com over .tk is solely about SEO. Other than that there are no differences. And that only matters because .tk is a country-based domain and .com is universal. Actually, a lot of registrars give free privacy. The problem is if you're running an actual business (or really anything where you want authority) you need to leave it public as transparency (stores, authority blogs, etc.). Just looked at your site, actually. If you change to a more static payment method (instead of random) I'd be willing to feature it on the BTC Faucet Rotator (http://coinfaucets.tk). Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: jackjack on June 11, 2013, 09:47:56 AM Thanks
Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: ranlo on June 11, 2013, 09:51:04 AM I wish I could. As I'm only a sort-of a techie but not a coder, I have to process every payment by hand as well as be aware of the min transaction limit in bitcoin-qt. If I knew how to code php or any similiar language, I could make accumulative payments, 24 or 8 or something hour limits without having to check addresses and of course automatic payments. But as I only know how to review and check code, I'm unable to do such. Awwww, :(. I know PHP (that's what the rotator is built in) but when it comes to interfacing with the client I wouldn't even know where to start. Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: mprep on June 11, 2013, 09:54:15 AM I wish I could. As I'm only a sort-of a techie but not a coder, I have to process every payment by hand as well as be aware of the min transaction limit in bitcoin-qt. If I knew how to code php or any similiar language, I could make accumulative payments, 24 or 8 or something hour limits without having to check addresses and of course automatic payments. But as I only know how to review and check code, I'm unable to do such. Awwww, :(. I know PHP (that's what the rotator is built in) but when it comes to interfacing with the client I wouldn't even know where to start. Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: ranlo on June 11, 2013, 09:59:42 AM I wish I could. As I'm only a sort-of a techie but not a coder, I have to process every payment by hand as well as be aware of the min transaction limit in bitcoin-qt. If I knew how to code php or any similiar language, I could make accumulative payments, 24 or 8 or something hour limits without having to check addresses and of course automatic payments. But as I only know how to review and check code, I'm unable to do such. Awwww, :(. I know PHP (that's what the rotator is built in) but when it comes to interfacing with the client I wouldn't even know where to start. This makes it seem pretty easy: http://blockchain.info/api/blockchain_wallet_api Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: mprep on June 11, 2013, 10:07:08 AM I wish I could. As I'm only a sort-of a techie but not a coder, I have to process every payment by hand as well as be aware of the min transaction limit in bitcoin-qt. If I knew how to code php or any similiar language, I could make accumulative payments, 24 or 8 or something hour limits without having to check addresses and of course automatic payments. But as I only know how to review and check code, I'm unable to do such. Awwww, :(. I know PHP (that's what the rotator is built in) but when it comes to interfacing with the client I wouldn't even know where to start. This makes it seem pretty easy: http://blockchain.info/api/blockchain_wallet_api Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: ranlo on June 11, 2013, 10:10:48 AM I wish I could. As I'm only a sort-of a techie but not a coder, I have to process every payment by hand as well as be aware of the min transaction limit in bitcoin-qt. If I knew how to code php or any similiar language, I could make accumulative payments, 24 or 8 or something hour limits without having to check addresses and of course automatic payments. But as I only know how to review and check code, I'm unable to do such. Awwww, :(. I know PHP (that's what the rotator is built in) but when it comes to interfacing with the client I wouldn't even know where to start. This makes it seem pretty easy: http://blockchain.info/api/blockchain_wallet_api I'm not sure how to actually do the pinging for the auto payments. I think that's a cron job or something. I think I can handle the rest though if you want me to mock up a script (it'll be the code part, not the visual part though -- I'm a coder, not a designer, :P). Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: mprep on June 11, 2013, 10:16:12 AM I wish I could. As I'm only a sort-of a techie but not a coder, I have to process every payment by hand as well as be aware of the min transaction limit in bitcoin-qt. If I knew how to code php or any similiar language, I could make accumulative payments, 24 or 8 or something hour limits without having to check addresses and of course automatic payments. But as I only know how to review and check code, I'm unable to do such. Awwww, :(. I know PHP (that's what the rotator is built in) but when it comes to interfacing with the client I wouldn't even know where to start. This makes it seem pretty easy: http://blockchain.info/api/blockchain_wallet_api I'm not sure how to actually do the pinging for the auto payments. I think that's a cron job or something. I think I can handle the rest though if you want me to mock up a script (it'll be the code part, not the visual part though -- I'm a coder, not a designer, :P). Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: ranlo on June 11, 2013, 10:17:31 AM I wish I could. As I'm only a sort-of a techie but not a coder, I have to process every payment by hand as well as be aware of the min transaction limit in bitcoin-qt. If I knew how to code php or any similiar language, I could make accumulative payments, 24 or 8 or something hour limits without having to check addresses and of course automatic payments. But as I only know how to review and check code, I'm unable to do such. Awwww, :(. I know PHP (that's what the rotator is built in) but when it comes to interfacing with the client I wouldn't even know where to start. This makes it seem pretty easy: http://blockchain.info/api/blockchain_wallet_api I'm not sure how to actually do the pinging for the auto payments. I think that's a cron job or something. I think I can handle the rest though if you want me to mock up a script (it'll be the code part, not the visual part though -- I'm a coder, not a designer, :P). Sure, I'll take a look at it. Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: mprep on June 11, 2013, 10:22:36 AM Here's the link to the thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=201973.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=201973.0)
Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: ranlo on June 11, 2013, 10:25:16 AM Here's the link to the thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=201973.0 Got it. Going to look it over and I'll send you a pm, :). Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: mprep on June 11, 2013, 10:29:44 AM Here's the link to the thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=201973.0 Got it. Going to look it over and I'll send you a pm, :). Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: RichG on June 11, 2013, 08:40:58 PM I wish I could. As I'm only a sort-of a techie but not a coder, I have to process every payment by hand as well as be aware of the min transaction limit in bitcoin-qt. If I knew how to code php or any similiar language, I could make accumulative payments, 24 or 8 or something hour limits without having to check addresses and of course automatic payments. But as I only know how to review and check code, I'm unable to do such. Awwww, :(. I know PHP (that's what the rotator is built in) but when it comes to interfacing with the client I wouldn't even know where to start. Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: ranlo on June 11, 2013, 10:10:42 PM I wish I could. As I'm only a sort-of a techie but not a coder, I have to process every payment by hand as well as be aware of the min transaction limit in bitcoin-qt. If I knew how to code php or any similiar language, I could make accumulative payments, 24 or 8 or something hour limits without having to check addresses and of course automatic payments. But as I only know how to review and check code, I'm unable to do such. Awwww, :(. I know PHP (that's what the rotator is built in) but when it comes to interfacing with the client I wouldn't even know where to start. Ugh, JSON, lol. I need to get a bit more adept at PHP before I move into that. Sadly I lack the real capability of doing OOP. I use.... structured *gasp* :p Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: bitbybit2 on June 12, 2013, 11:19:56 AM DOT.TK SPYWARE ALERT I visited dot.tk on my company computer and it detected spyware. Not sure if real or not but be careful! :) It is an exaggeration. I have noticed the same with anonpaste.me . Title: Re: dot.tk Post by: mprep on June 12, 2013, 05:14:59 PM DOT.TK SPYWARE ALERT I visited dot.tk on my company computer and it detected spyware. Not sure if real or not but be careful! :) It is an exaggeration. I have noticed the same with anonpaste.me . |