Bitcoin Forum

Bitcoin => Hardware => Topic started by: farproc on June 19, 2013, 10:24:45 PM



Title: Avalon June 19 update
Post by: farproc on June 19, 2013, 10:24:45 PM
Just got the mail:
Quote
most orders have been added to the system, shipping has began en mass.
picture are worth a thousands of words.
http://avalon-asic.us5.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=238a9ecd2e5192e3cd3ace26d&id=7f2b693b04&e=16c54c7989

Quote
shipping has began en mass.
This may explain the recent hash power decreasing:
They were mining with customers' hardware!!!! :-[


Title: Re: Avalon June 19 update
Post by: BitSyncom on June 19, 2013, 10:26:32 PM
no, don't you mean this?

http://www.asicminercharts.com/


Title: Re: Avalon June 19 update
Post by: AFox on June 19, 2013, 10:26:49 PM
Already discussed here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=238391.0


Title: Re: Avalon June 19 update
Post by: Dalkore on June 19, 2013, 11:26:05 PM
no, don't you mean this?

http://www.asicminercharts.com/

That is a huge drop from ASICMiner.   Power failure?


Title: Re: Avalon June 19 update
Post by: glendall on June 19, 2013, 11:57:47 PM
^^^^ I don't think anyone figured this out yet.

Maybe ASICMINER is reconfiguring there entire setup in plans to bring an additional 200 TH online.


Title: Re: Avalon June 19 update
Post by: rammy2k2 on June 20, 2013, 12:33:46 AM
nice pics for sure !  ;D


Title: Re: Avalon June 19 update
Post by: suprabitz on June 23, 2013, 04:41:03 PM
i wouldnt fault them for mining with customers hardware for a couple days to a week to burn in properly and check for faults. last thing you want is to get your unit and it doesnt work. now if they kept them for weeks or months thats another story


Title: Re: Avalon June 19 update
Post by: cpengr on June 23, 2013, 06:38:58 PM
i wouldnt fault them for mining with customers hardware for a couple days to a week to burn in properly and check for faults. last thing you want is to get your unit and it doesnt work. now if they kept them for weeks or months thats another story

Maybe.

Or maybe manufacturers doing such testing should be using the testnet, so as to not reduce revenue for their other paying customers.