Bitcoin Forum

Economy => Reputation => Topic started by: antikonti on December 17, 2017, 05:57:25 AM



Title: Questions to Lauda.
Post by: antikonti on December 17, 2017, 05:57:25 AM
In first place, I would like to make this public because of a bit ignorance.
This thread is self-moderated for the only reason that no other opinions/posts are needed than Lauda.
I were kind enough to request and ask you, based your negative feedback on my trust score is not based on anything wrong on this forum, including not violating any forum rule to have self moderated thread.
the person who made me clear the thread it self removed the negative trust from my profile and your trust score was based on his words which are already in the past.
My questions is, what else you expect from me for this negative trust to be removed?
My thread is completely legit/valid with proof of ownership and everything needed.
No one were lied/scammed/cheated by me and nothing wrong was done from me to anyone.
I would like my negative trust to be removed, or at least to get answer what I should done to be removed.
Never did anything wrong to receive any negative feedback, and all the words was empty talks with no ground or evidences.
Everyone know it except the people who are here just to troll around.
I'm posting this to the public because I was kind enough to ask you via private messages ( http://prntscr.com/hojx6i , http://prntscr.com/hojx8o)
But all I get was ignorance -> http://prntscr.com/hojxdy
I would like to tell you that definition of "spam" is (Spamming, unsolicited or undesired electronic messages).
My messages based on the actions cannot be called unsolicited or undesired.
Thanks for your attention.

*I'm going to repeat that every single post other than Lauda posts will be removed because it will be off-topic.
** This thread is only made public so people can see the treatment to people who done nothing wrong but get unfair trust score.
If trusted people like Lauda abusing the trust system or not giving second chance to new members to improve their activity, then I don't know who can newbies trust and ask for help/knowledge.


Title: Re: Questions to Lauda.
Post by: Lauda on December 17, 2017, 06:35:37 AM
Maybe, just maybe, I have a life and maybe, just maybe you shouldn't be self-entitled and harassing people over the weekend. The number of times that you've PM'd me within 24-36 hours is what I consider spamming and usually put one on PM ignore right away.
Sigh, I'll get to it when I can.


Title: Re: Questions to Lauda.
Post by: antikonti on December 17, 2017, 08:04:32 AM
Maybe, just maybe, I have a life and maybe, just maybe you shouldn't be self-entitled and harassing people over the weekend. The number of times that you've PM'd me within 24-36 hours is what I consider spamming and usually put one on PM ignore right away.
Sigh, I'll get to it when I can.
Thanks for the answer.
Resolved for now.


Title: Re: Questions to Lauda.
Post by: antikonti on December 18, 2017, 03:56:52 AM
Thread is open again


Title: Re: Questions to Lauda.
Post by: antikonti on December 18, 2017, 02:13:25 PM
Looking forward to speak with you Lauda.


Title: Re: Questions to Lauda.
Post by: Lauda on December 18, 2017, 02:14:50 PM
Looking forward to speak with you Lauda.
a) You are breaking the rules by overbumping.
b) To you "soon" does not mean the next day. I will try to get to this in the next few days. There's no need to bump this until such has passed.


Title: Re: Questions to Lauda.
Post by: antikonti on December 21, 2017, 09:26:40 PM
Thread open again because of ignorance.


Title: Re: Questions to Lauda.
Post by: Lauda on December 21, 2017, 09:29:33 PM
Thread open again because of ignorance.
Moved 5 positions down the queue because of annoyance.


Title: Re: Questions to Lauda.
Post by: antikonti on December 29, 2017, 04:37:14 PM
never did anything wrong, always providing proof of ownership and accepting escrow.
not sure why I still have this red trust.
waiting from 2 weeks for some attention, this is absurd