Bitcoin Forum

Is there any rating of bounty managers available? That could be a great resource to see who is most experienced and best.

I have never even heard such a question posed before. What is bounty managers? Is it someone that promotes bounty ops for multiple projects? Could be interesting and lucrative work.

Very interesting idea. It's cool. Perhaps somebody could bring this idea into reality. It would be helpfull not only for ICOs but also for bountyhunters.
Such rating could even help bountyhunters to get the best ICOs based on bountymanagers picks.

- Aren't the forum's trust ratings enough ? I mean if someone's a good manager,that would reflect on his ratings.
- Moreover,who'd you call a great bounty manager ? Someone's who's good at managing spreedsheets or someone who can make sure the bounties help in reaching the target audience ?
-Subjective

In my opinion, it is a great idea. Plus the fact that in one subject you can see reviews of all the managers and make a choice the bounty. For example, I have experience in the projects with horrible support. And I would not want to repeat the mistakes.

I have never found any rank about bounty manager.
but as long as I become bounty hunters, I feel comfortable and very happy to always join the Amazix Community ..
Amazix Community is a group of professional crypto ICO consultants who have technical expertise, are excellent at support and led by an elite team of managers. Providing a turnkey service to crypto projects based on Bancor or on the Ethereal Network.
The AmaZix has the ability to advise you on your community engagement in all social channels, as well as the ressources needed to manage those channels for you. This is but one of our skills.
To join our growing network of bounty hunters reach out to @AndrewCB

Reach out for more info.

Visit our site: http://www.amazix.com

I think that the discussion and rating on the forum is enough. But the idea is good and I think that soon there will be specialized sites.

It would be good to see how much bounty successfully completed a particular Manager. To read testimonials from participants of bounty, how responsive managers are as quick to answer queries, etc.

Interesting ideas,create the spirit of the management also there must be a forum bounty manager.

Yes, it is subjective, but there can also be objective means to indicate if a bounty manager is good and effective. For me, for example, the bounty manager has very little control in helping bounties reach target audience. This is down to the project itself to set rules, to determine context and audience. The manager merely takes instructions and within his influence can ensure best meeting of standards.

Some clear objective indicators for me are 1> Manager is always timely with updates to and from project. 2 > Manager ensures high quality of participation, only accepts good posters, for example, and acknowledges all black lists and bans. 3 > Manager communicates well with constructive feedback. Can a poster improve? Can a poster be warned?

I'm still very little involved in the bounty companies. But a friend who participates for a long time, said that he likes sylon, Colorless, Avirunes of Course it's his subjective opinion.

When it comes to ratings then it would really be different and I don't see trust ratings would really be majorly be a basis since not all ratings came from on managing campaigns. Choices would really differ since not all participants do have the same selections that we can able to make ranking precisely.I have seen and joined already some good bounty managers which are good on handling the project marketing at the same time on handling its participants.

There are lots of good bounty managers and I think rating them can help for the bounty hunters and ICO'S. If I will rate bounty manager I probably look how they hold the campaign, distribute the token in the most fairly system and always at the time when spreadsheets need to update. I want also those manager who are easily to talk and down to earth eventhough they are in a high position.

Good point to promote yourself  ;)
But I almost agree with you, this team act very professional, I used to participate in few campaigns. Very fast calculations in spreadsheet, good and fast communication, fast payments. And from other side many participants, what is good for company.

It would be a good idea to make somekind of bounty manager rating, I personally find very unprofessional when bounty manager is newbie user, who is created just for this purpose, I try to avoid such campaigns.

Ratings doesnt say that every campaign that they manage will become successful , its pure luck and with the help of thier bounty participants the project will become successful.

Agreed, bounty managers are just holding the campaign but none of them knows how the ICO will success. They don't know whay is the best ICO and a scam. I think the problem here is the projects who are running at the end of campaign. Managers should not be rated because all of them are responsible with their campaign even there is delayed in spreadsheet.

would be nice if someone make a proper thread about that . like what we have about signature campaign.

as i know there is only forum's trust rating

Yeah, a rating system would be actually nice. Even though bounty managers are not responsible and cannot influence the actual ICO results and the success, what they certainly can do is to provide a good communication to the bounty hunters. What I have experienced a few times is that sometimes bounty managers would respond with a huge delay (days) to quite important questions or would not respond at all. I know that it must be difficult for them to handle all the requests however communication is one of the most important factors here.

You can check all of them on services under marketplace and the other one is altcoin bounties. There are some that have that positive ratings like Yahoo which is the most popular in the btc campaign but still, check for feedbacks from other members.

If you ask who is the most efficient bounty manager in this forum with lots of experience then I my answer would be yahoo. He is a wonderful manager . To tell this answer I don't think any survey is required.

Are you referring to a separate rating that is not seen in the profile? If yes, I don't think that that exists. But ever since I started joining campaigns, I only joined campaigns that is managed by deadley. He has a high trust rating so I'm sure he is a good bounty manager.

sometimes we don't know how the bounty manager do their job exactly, i had an experience about that
Rating and Ranking not just enough...must have port folio, that's it

Unfortunately I don´t know any pre-made list. This sector is not yet mature enough and information is sparse. But try to look into Quanstamp and Wabi ICOs which had been a good experience for participans and a financial success.

There's no existing list of bounty managers that are listed to rate them or does have their rating from other people who participated their campaign. What you can just simply do is when you are about to join a campaign you must check their trust page and see on how many people gave them positive feed back for their smooth campaign that they managed. Most of the participants are giving positive feed back to the bounty managers if they are satisfied with his job.

I would be very interested on this. A friend of mine told me that some bounty managers are very rude, like if the people that are promoting the project were actually some short of stupid employees or some short of cheap labour. I hope I have good luck now that I in a bounty ;)

Bounty participants can explain that very well to us. You may find the top listed signature campaign manager list there in service discussion section.
I think in bounty side you will see Jamal aezaz as perfect one who is maintaining trust between all the managers in the bounty side. However, signature side Yahoo still hold the first place in managing that.

I think the above posters Ideas are good guidelines.

I would add reading through the bounty managers recent posts.  You can put together a good picture of their general attitude and professionalism or lack thereof.

I have very low experience on this forum, but I think that such information would be very helpfull for newcomers like me)) Hope we will see one day such rating) :)

Lately there many projects run with by AmaziX. They are very strict with the rules and some of them a bit harsh with the bounty hunters. I would say the get the job done.

I think yahoo is best on both bounty and Signature sides.He had professional behavior on managing the campaign.I had worked with him of many campaigns.I had received my payment on time with no delay.Yahoo is the legend of Manager.So if you are looking for the manager,Yahoo is the best option.

Of course the idea is not new, but relevant. The truth must be borne in mind that not everything depends on the manager. But if not in time notes, or in the branch does not appear, then yes, these should be taken on a pencil.

There are many signature campaign managers in the market and all are not perfect like Yahoo does in managing the signature and bounty campaigns. Since he started managing the bounties recently. He is doing part better any bounty manager doing here.
Other than yahoo. I like the Jamal, Ahmad and Loycev. These people are very promising bounty managers who distributing the tokens at the right time all the people working with the campaigns they manage.

From my point of view, if bounty campaigns announce the identity of bounty managers, it will be beneficial for evaluating whether the ICO is trustworthy or not. And should have bounty managers rating, this will motivate managers to work more efficiently on time rather than delaying in current bounty campaigns :))

Although I think it is a great idea, but in fairness there are not many known bounty managers. If you follow to forum for a bit and see the projects and all you'll be familiar with the good ones.  ;D

If the rating of a bounty manager is high and eventually a crypto project will prove to be a fraud, what will it change?

At the expense of service and managers do not know,but there's definitely a name I can't recall of course that track the upcoming ico and bounty to them, and put them rating.

I haven't found any thread about ratings of bounty managers but I have found a thread that lists different campaign manager and you can found it here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2842283.0
And base on my stay here in the forum, the most experienced and the best managers IMHO are yahoo62278, Lutpin and Lauda. They have their own portfolio and threads that shows their pasts campaigns, just do the searching of it here in forum.

Exactly! I do not see the need to come up with a rating system exclusive for bounty managers. The forum's trust rating was created to also function for that purpose. I personally consider the rank and trust rating of a bounty manager before joining any campaign. A legendary manager with a positive trust rating will definitely be the best option to consider because of his credibility.

My list of good managers (from my experience):
- yahoo62278
- Sylon
- jamalaezaz   
- irfan_pak10 
- deadley 
- ColorlessK   
- needmoney   
- Arteezy.rtx   
- trugad

And 2 bounty platforms:
- https://icoreward.com/
- https://bountyhive.io/

I appreciate manager Sergei.Gerasimenko. He is quite thoughtful and attentive, fair and calm.

Why in the list there are jamalaezaz? Not always right thinks stakes. Not responding to questions and requests to change stakes when I give him proof.
Found in Russian Local this topic: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2845483.msg29193431#msg29193431.
Written very informative, took her to bookmarks

I like the list of people who manage your good bounty campaigns. I also often participate in the campaign of Sylon, yahoo62278 and deadley, the rest I have not joined. I will refer more about the projects of the rest. Thank you for sharing this.

I have lots of bounty managers that I am joining but this one greatly perfect for me for being a responsible and kind manager in campaign.Yahoo 62278 is such a good manager  and always participate to his member ,fair and thoughtful and especially updated in to his payment for us.

Interesting topic. Been thinking about it. It is important not only rating, but also anti-rating, i.e. the list of managers in companies which can not participate!

I haven't come across the bounty manager ratings. They keeps on changing. But I have seen few awesome guys- like colorlessk and Steve from Gladius bounty. These guys are awesome. Steve especially is very responsive and took extra steps to eliminate the fake profile and fake bounty hunters. Very thank full to him!!

I think that it's a great idea! But I don't think that all bounty managers will like it :)

all managers will be good when he has a lot to participate in the success of the project.
I prefer to follow a bounty manager who is firm and always updated about the questions asked by bounty participants.

I have to agree that Amazix do handle themselves very professionally.  I've signed up to several of their campaigns in recent months and find the support structure they provide (standardised bounty layout; Telegram bounty room for the ICOs, etc) very useful for when you have queries or issues with a particular aspect of the campaign.

Good time.
In fact, I can not disagree with the fact that we need an anti-rating, together with a rating that will raise the level of confidence.

Actually before this topic was created, I've created a list of managers that I think are good, and from my list of managers following the gifts they manage.

 

And what place is Tactic I think he is also a good bounty manager.

I find a caveat on this ranking - The managers can ban users for participating and giving them a bad rating could make the users be banned from their campaigns as retaliation. Also, the ratings could be misused to harm the reputation of good managers.

Too many problems to make a good rep system.

bounty managers are the selected persons to handle a bounty campaign ,they are in charge in evrything about campaign  like counting post, giving stakes and answering questions related to the campaign.

There's no existing list of bounty managers that are listed to rate them or does have their rating from other people who participated their campaign. What you can just simply do is when you are about to join a campaign you must check their trust page and see on how many people gave them positive feed back for their smooth campaign that they managed. Most of the participants are giving positive feed back to the bounty managers if they are satisfied with his job.

I think you should read this and it will help you to know about bounty managers of this forum.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3034728.0

If you have enough time read all of it.

There is no rating or ranking system is available to sort our the bounty managers but if you are an active forum member then you may know hwo are the best and you can check them by their trust ratings and don't forget to check the ratings from non DT members too.
I will say Yahoo is the best campaign manager ever and you can see that half of the running signature campaigns are only managed by Yahoo and he is also managing some bounties too.

It's a good idea, I think we should have a system where members evaluate a manager based on the bounty project he introduces, as well as his attitude when he supports the participation.

Its almost right.  Bounty manager is the people who handle the the campaign which will promote the project.
As i know, there is no such rating for that manager. Dont ever think that manager will be the most important reference.
The project quality is more important

Members or participants should evaluate managers through their performance and experience on how that managers work during the bounty.

I saw the list and my campaign manager isn't on it. Include also aTriz as one of the best campaign managers so far in the forum.

He's fair in judgment and also approachable if there are problems existing on his campaign.

There is no such things called "Rating of bounty managers". Even if there was/is any, i'm 100% sure if the result is invalid/bias. Why? Because people will pick/choose their manager which currently they joined. It's almost impossible to you to choose campaign manager A when you currently joined on campaign which managed by Campaign manager B.
As example on above me, he was joined on Bitdice campaign for several weeks and now when he moved to other project he is saying about other campaign manager (currently he joined).

This is a very interesting idea. This will give a an idea beforehand for the participants and help them make better decisions.

rating does not guarantee an ico they handle will work, I follow bounty always from amazix team, ico they handle all the success and also very big fee you can follow chanel telegram amazix here https://t.me/amazix

I will always select the bounty campaign with ICO rating and ico team and with white paper there no matter about the bounty manager.

I know that in joining a campaign it will only depend on the project itself whether or not the campaign will be successful and profitable but I think the point is the higher rating the higher chance of income when joining their campaign. Of course those managers will do their research about the project before accepting the job and for the past camapaigns that I have with one of the bounty manager all of them are successful and I am satisfied with the rewards.

An interesting proposal, but practically applying it correctly will be difficult. I suppose that the project managers can at any time change the manager of the company's bounty.

I think it's an interesting idea, but It depends on the project itself to set rules, to define the context and the audience. Managers only make the decision to ensure the best meeting standard and create the spirit of management must also have the manager of the bounty forum.

Everybody make an own rating in due course. I've worked with the deadley manager more than once. He always on time answers questions and honestly keeps a score of steaks. I like working with him. This is my subjective opinion.

Perhaps a manager can influence your choice, there are really examples of good leading campaign specialists. But the basis of choice should be based on an understanding of the concept of the project you are entering.

Currently, on the forum, I do not see the evaluation of the bounty manager :)). But in my view, bounty managers are unnecessary because each person will have different thoughts on each manager. So if the manager judges each bounty will not be fair to them. Instead, self-assessing and choosing the managers would be better.

A very good & interesting idea.
IMHO, that will help the bounty hunter community alot
That also create a competitive environment for BM on arranging & completing their work in more effective way & proper way.
Also that will help effective BM to gain more projects & more reputation

I did not meet such a resource, where there was a rating of managers of generosity. In my opinion, everyone who makes money in bonuses campaigns knows the best managers.

in most cases it all happens that way, because they only pay attention to a quality project, But also to the name of the manager who conducts the Bounty company.

Yes of course, understanding the project will still matter but having a great manager can help the project advertise and its more comfortable for the bounty hunters to participate because they know that the manager works so hard for every campaign he managed.

I already read a topic in this forum about bounty manager but unfortunately I didn't save the link of this topic :(. As I feel and follow all other member in this forum, I can ensure that the best bounty manager in this forum must be Yahoo and deadley, both of them are truthworthy managers, all campaign that managed by these manager are very good. For now, I'm being in BuzzShow bounty campaign which managed by Yahoo :)

It will depends on how they market the product during ICO with their bounty hunters. But looking back on their past project you will notice that it was successful project and they keep on tracking good projects. If Bounty managers are having a hard time on checking spreadsheet then something is missing on them maybe they are tired? or lousy? A good Bounty Managers are always active and somehow they could give you special bounty for a good campaign.

Bounty managers rate are the same in my own , but thier popularity i would say yahoo is leading the place in signature bounty ,  next on the list will be sylon, atriz, needmoney,deadley

I am still confused to determine a decent bounty manager. because there are some ICO whose managers are still ranked newbie. this is very influential on the interest of inverstor. I think the rankings are right above the members.

I don't know why they accept a bad poster like you on their campaigns. You should be blacklisted for being a bad poster until your english is improved.

Ussually those managers are coming from their own project (whose using newbie account). They don't hire any campaign manager.

I think that as soon as you create such a resource, the rather dirty battle for ratings will begin. I wouldn't trust those.

I agree. Just do some research yourself. Check previous bounties. How did the bounty manager do? Was he/she supportive or tight on regulations? How did they communicate? How did they solve problems? Et cetera.

Getting a thread with topic "bounty campaign maneger rating and trusted ones" can be helpful because you based on the campaign that best ICO they got( As I see on your question here) So yeah like other told you cant get a list of threads which a one person can create and thatvis only base on there bounty campaign experience.

I would say and suggest make a topic like A question of " Please give your own list of best campaign manegers go encountered with? which one of them is great? Which one of them has nice propper communication? In which you should revised you topic or make anothe like what I wrote here. Remember if tgey did give you is because they want you to know about the well known campaign manager.

You should just specify it the question.

Yeah! It is nessecery now! Because there are a lot of situation when bounty manager do unfair things. And we should know good and bad managers.

Good idea! Let's do some kind of ICO for bounty managers ;)

What did I just read ? Learn basic spellings man.You are paid to carry a signature by a bounty manager for writing crap.This is exactly the kind of bounty managers we need to get rid off.

To start with,I'd advise finding users like you who are hired by the bounty managers for shit-posting and take actions against them.This isn't just limited to the bounties but decreases the quality of the forum overall.

I haven't seen a Thread that gives information about the rating of Bounty manager but i guess there is.
Check This Thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3034728.msg32533675#msg32533675 This can give you an idea who could be the great manager. One Of my best manager is yahoo62278, He picks Real Paying project, He Himself is the escrow if i'm not mistaken.  He Have Handled Realisti Project Like, Vehicle Lifecycycle Blockchain (VLB), Insurepal (INL) Recommended By J MCafee and is now listed on exchange site, JIBREL, INDAHASH, and Currently are, ELIGMA, ALAX, COntractnet and may more. If I'll rate him 1-100 I'll give Him 95, because not all managers are Perfect.

Manager rating !!!!
I did not heard that kind of word in forum yet. But i think it can be open for good or bad managing. Some manager is so lazy that they do not give any answer in right time. It is so painful. So it should run.

Basically, if the bounties are led by team members, they are more loyal.
but when managers are a bit more sad, although this is not the rule. this is my view. From managers depends on the counting of stacks. The honesty of the owners of projects and the guarantee of getting tokens in their wallet from them does not really depend.

If you ask who is the most effective bonuses manager in this forum with a lot of experience, I would say that it will be yahoo. He's a great manager.

Below are three bounty managers in my opinion best for now. maybe for your recommendation choose bounty :

1) deadley Overall Impression: He and his helper is the most adequate on this forum. Actively answer in a personal and in a telegram. The most adequate on the forum. He has a telegram where he writes his latest news https://t.me/deadleybounty It requires weekly reports. With this manager you can earn tokens Grin I earned 204 INS tokens with him. This is for Twitter and Facebook. approximately  $ 500. Now I participate in many of his companies. If the manager limited the number of participants it would be ideal at all Grin Cheesy

active companies that I know
SocialMedia.Market
Ntok
Kryll
Lendroid


2) Colorlessk This manager rarely responds to private messages, but there are no problems with him. He has a lot of companies but I like working with him because he does not have to do reports. He now has his own bounty portal. I advise you to visit it https://bountyhive.io/ Has earned with it 900 tokens Soma. This is for Twitter and Facebook. approximately  $ 250. Now I participate in many of his companies


3) Sylon I like that he is very active with so many companies that he leads. I did not have any problems with him. Reports he does not require. He has generous awards for the signature but very small for the twitter. Plus, the fact that he does not require reports, and the downside is that he keeps the calculations after the ICO ends and many retweets fly during this time. Worked for him on Twitter and received 3000 PRL.

People can have their own favorite and rating over manager, because it is hard to compare one to another, there are so many factors and value to consider to make a rating of them. While i say so, i kinda agree to this one post. yahoo62278 is a great manager for me, he has rules and always stick to it, strict to the cheaters, kind to great participant, and he had handle great project like insurepal, jibrel, bustadice and now he is one of the advisors of VLB, that is a great portfolio to consider he is one of the best among other managers.

Interesting topic, you need to take note. Yes, all managers come across fraud, there's nothing to be done about it, everyone is wrong, but all successful campaigns are profitable enough, I think.

I suggest to choose a bounty manager whose ranking is already hero ,, legendary .. so far as long as I am working on a project from bounty manager who has a rating that is always success.,

I think until now not available yet, however your idea is good. But not only bounty manager pools but also some members who do not have experienced yet but interested to be a bounty manager... ;D

This idea is great, it will make bounty managers more attentive in their work. Some bounty managers have a very bad attitude towards the participants

Hmmm... My little list of ok managers:
1. sylon
2. needmoney
3. blockeye
4. sergei.gerasimenko

Indeed, it is subjective, however there can likewise be target intends to show if an abundance director is great and viable. For me, for instance, the abundance supervisor has next to no control in helping bounties achieve target gathering of people. This is down to the undertaking itself to set tenets, to decide setting and group of onlookers. The supervisor simply takes guidelines and inside his impact can guarantee best gathering of gauges.
Some reasonable target markers for me are
1) Manager is constantly convenient with updates to and from venture.
2) Manager guarantees high caliber of investment, just acknowledges great publications, for instance, and recognizes every single boycott and bans.
3) Manager discusses well with valuable input. Could a notice make strides? Could a blurb be cautioned?

Great idea, but difficult to archive it properly. So who will leave these ratings - bounty participants, ICO owners?
But conceptually it would be great to see best campaign managers and their past&ongoing campaigns. And statistics about how successful were these campaigns.

I agree with your list because these are also bounty managers. I regularly participate in the bounty programs they manage. I also added three very good bounty program managers that are: aTriz, deadley and yahoo62278.

Dont believe that the current rating system is enough. Moreover Merits definitely ar not objective since managers get a lot of merits for campaigns which are successful and give them a lot of profit.

One can be a great manager but project can fail and in other situation, campaign manager could be poor but a project could be a successful.


I believe that the rating should be based on how do manager manages spreadsheets, how many mistakes he makes and how he corrects them. Also how he communicates.

I have been wondering how much does manager contribute regarding the distribution of bounty, does manager is the one who decides what % is going to different bounty types, signature, twitter and so on ?

Yes im hoping for that to happen because a lot of bounty managers are not updating the stakes and sometimes they skip of some bounty reports. But it should not anytime every time because a lot of bounty hunters are doing their best.

Thanks for creating this thread

about Sandra Evans I can only say good: I asked about shares, she counted all that was missed, and the answer was sent that everything is ok. I will continue to work with this manager

Usually, if the bounty manager is the developer himself, this is not bad, but more professional bounty managers with high rank on the forum cause more confidence. This is only my opinion.

The idea is good, it's just what the assessment will be like? Is it from the project, or from the bounty manager himself? I think this is rather difficult, although I support this idea.

BTC paying signature campaign or bounties. In this both the side yahoo would be the right person to get the 5 out of 5 whether it is participants rating or previously used project owner's rating. He is mister perfect in managing any kind of signature campaign I have noticed.
When there is no ICO in end of 2015 onwards I am seeing him. So far and present, He is perfect person to manage the any kind of campaign. He is been advisor for some ICO projects as well.

My Top Three bestie Managers are below:

Yahoo62278
aTriz
Hexah

Trust rating is one way of showing that some one is good as bounty manager and most of the hunters always mention someone name to one. Like this thread
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3085997.0

''If you do bad people will talk about you but when you do great then member will spread your name...''

There are some bounty managers that trusted in rating.They are responsible in paying us weekly and following their rules and regulations must worth it for us.They try everything to make their project successful and thats the traits of every campaign manager need.

Depends on how many campaigns the had succeeded some bounties are failed but if bounty managers are very loyal on their participants and pay tokens on time then they can have alot of projects to get.

"trust" that resides in each account in my opinion including rating. however, only moderators can provide a rating to the bounty managers. if we can give it also may be better, because we often encounter a scam

 
      I do not think there's a reward manager rating, but I'm convinced it would be a great idea. In addition to the rating of ICO projects, there is also a reward rating. It would have seemed wonderful to me.

I think trust rating is enough to know who is the best manager because anyone can manage campaign of they want so it is impossible to track the manahers and implement a rating system for them so see their trust rating before hiring them and there are already some well know managers are available so they can be considered as best.

Maybe this can work. We don't see green trust in managers that much -red trust more often on those lazy ones-. I don't know are people having trust issues?  ;D

Maybe we can do a community voting poll for this. To bring out best managers who actually check campaigns and hunters good.

Met such a material in the Russian-language branch, but I want to say that this is not the best way to choose a company

As for me, i haven't come across the bounty manager ratings. It keeps on changing, but I`ve seen few awesome guys like colorlessk and Steve from Gladius bounty. These guys r rly not bad. Steve especially is very responsive and took extra steps to eliminate the fake profile and fake bounty hunters i think.

good advice, it may be very helpful for who will look for bounty project and also can reduce the number of bounty scam, because according to me if the experienced manager will not be possible the project scam  ;)

What are the things you should include in the criteria for rating the bounty managers? Like is it the way they give stakes?

Its great and i will support this too.
As i know, the manager is only small piece of success so i will not so aware about it.
As i know, there is more important thing which can make success beside manager like team and others.

In General, AmaZix team conducts good projects, but the comfort of participation in the project, unfortunately, depends on the specific Manager. I have a negative experience with TagaMungkahi from AmaZix. Anyone interested can see how the Manager checks the report and what is happening with spredsheets project Current.

I think there is. But i don't have any idea if anyone can make a rating to all bounty managers. I guess only the ICO bounty team will give the ratings to the bounty managers and not the users nor participants.

Give a rating to bounty manager, if in my opinion, he who updates spreadsheed ontime,
quick response,  On time Distribution of token stake.

I think the idea is good, but it is very hard to make an objective rating, because everyone can give just a personal subjective rating

interesting idea to read testimonials from participants of bounty, how responsive managers are as quick to answer queries, etc
Yeah, a rating system would be actually nice. Even though bounty managers are not responsible and cannot influence the actual ICO results and the success, what they certainly can do is to provide a good communication to the bounty hunters

What rating of bounty managers could be? What is the criteria of good bounty manager? We will include all bounty managers or most famous?

Good information, you have information with bad bounty managers, with whom it's better not to run a bounty program.

I totally agree with you. Yahoo62278 is a very good manager, but due to its popularity it's very difficult to get to it. Registration closes very quickly

 Certainly be! Here guy describes everything in detail, come and see for yourself! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3034728.0

for me only the best managers are just yahoo and needmoney because since i start bitcoin yahoo is really good if manager then on altcoins is needmoney because i am a trusted and well known for me yahoo and needmoney are the trusted managers for me because they are the ones who join the campaign.

There are many campaign managers now that are good, and those managers that has green trust is an advantage but still not necessarily to have it. Because still there is a managers which is good actually even they don't have positive trust.

That's true.

But you all need to bear in mind,  sometimes bounty managers are in fact the community management team, and the bounty threads are posted by the ICOs accounts so no way of knowing who's the Bounty manager.

That would be useful, but no rating can protect from sudden fraud or scam...Personally I recommend to pay attention to amazix managers, they're really good.

bounty managers have a really important role. A factor I'm paying attention to is trust. There are a few bonty managers I know on the market.

I agree, these are good managers. They have a lot of good projects. But recently they have complicated the conditions for participation. But I believe that this is only a plus.

the topic is interesting. it depends on how many campaigns did their jobs in order to service the participants. it also can evaluate the manager work during the bounty. sometimes, the high ranking can be trusted by everyone.

Im still hoping for this function to be activated too, because a lot of bounty managers are lazy updating the spreadsheets and some are good too.

May I ask a link to the ICOs they hold? I would to check them out.

i think there's informal ones, but haven't seen a real formal ranking before. at the moment i actually like https://bountyhive.io (http://bountyhive.io/r/AlbertLee).. if u consider the platform as a whole as a "bounty manager"... no need for the regular reporting in btc bounty threads, communication is clear, bounty rules are well marked out, payment is quick. makes things 5 times as efficient.

This is a good idea as some bounty managers don't even care of the bounty hunters and don't even reply to questions. They just posts the bounty they manage and the rules after that the bounty hunters are on their own because they won't answer questions from them so sad.

What kind of rating? in which area or what criteria should be used to provide one?  You can use the forum as a tool to search for the best and experienced bounty campaign managers. Actually you can just simply check their trust rating, that would be enough to Identify a good manager.

Can't remember the place I read about rate of bounty manager in this forum. But I can ensure that there is a topic about bounty managers in this forum. Sorry that I can't find it out atm but if you wanna know the best bounty manager, I would suggest you Yahoo, deadley, needmoney, Sylon and Aerys2 ( this is my favorite bounty manager cause he often manages good bounty campaign with limited number of bounty participant)

This is a very interesting idea. This will give a an idea beforehand for the participants and help them make better decisions.

It would be a great idea to get them rather but I think they will take some stick for things when it’s out of their control and that wouldn’t be fair. Lots of the bounties at the minute are dependant on the people running the ico to be good and I think a lot of them keep making the same mistakes.

For me deni aka skrinnikov is good and fair.

I like the list of people who manage your good campaigns. I also often participate in the Silon campaign, yahoo62278 and deadley, the rest I did not join.

Of course the idea is not new, but relevant. The truth must be borne in mind that not everything depends on the manager. But if not in time notes, or in the branch does not appear, then yes, these should be taken on a pencil.

Till now, i never heard there is such rating from the community but people who felt happy with the support that managers are giving. In this way, the community is giving positive trust rating to the managers and at the same time, manager themselves proving their transparency.

For me good manager not only can manage good and quick update spreadsheet but they must choose the right and good project before managing the project because if they try to spread the word about the project but in the other side that the project scam people? Its not good manager.

I suggest to choose a bounty manager whose ranking is already hero ,, legendary .. so far as long as I am working on a project from bounty manager who has a rating that is always success.,

I think so. with a rating for bounty managers, we can decide to follow a promising campaign because the higher the rating the manager the more trusted the campaign.

this is very interesting how they (bounty manager) get paid from their project promotion
whether with the token of the project they are promoting? I am curious about it

#Joined airdrop
Bitcointalk: @ironurbane
Telegram: @ironurbane

I prefer the bounty manager from the rank of full member to the top because this according to my experience must be active and the campaign is completed.

Depends on how many campaigns the had succeeded some bounties are failed but if bounty managers are very loyal on their participants and pay tokens on time then they can have alot of projects to get.

Very useful idea, I think. There is some managers, who disappointed the bounty participants very much. And I am among them. If there was the list of bounty manager rating, they try to be patient at least. I have next idea. May be some of experienced bounty hunters can  make such list and publish it.

Not bad idea, it's just what the assessment will be like? Is it from the project, or from the bounty manager himself? I think this is rather difficult, although I support this idea.

if there was such a resource, then there would be constant cheating .. especially since there are always dissatisfied people, I think there is no such resource  :-\

There is anyone has provided information about a good bounty manager, the author of Ranillo79, please see here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3085997.0

I think every bounty hunter has his own list of top managers for whom he follows and participates in their bounty campaigns! Yes, I've seen tables of top bounty managers more than once!

I never see some rating of bounty managers around since some of the manager of a certain ICO is named after their project unlike the other with a high ranking profile, but we have a lot of thread about certain individual who run campaign continuously and they leave a comment per manager, you can look around.

I don't know if there is a rating for bounty managers. For me i rate the managers according to the successful ICO that they manage.

- Moreover,who'd you call a great bounty manager ? Someone's who's good at managing spreedsheets or someone who can make sure the bounties help in reaching the target audience ?
-Subjective

if someone's a good manager,that would reflect on his ratings.

My experience shows that such managers are often arrogant. They treat bounty hunters like cattle, like slaves.Before them, you need to kneel and beg plaintively. No business environment.

there are a lot of good gift managers, which they can hold the prize campaigns very well and I'm happy with the responsiveness of managers who respond quickly to the questions of campaign participants, and I prefer the menager who equally distributes tokens with quick calculations also professional

I think the rating should be the number of bounties he/she did manage against scammed/ no payments made.

Depends on how many campaigns the had succeeded some bounties r failed but if bounty managers r very loyal on their participants and pay tokens on time then they can have alot of projects to get.

Managers are really helpful to take the project promotion to this forum via bounty campaigning and signatures. As like that project owners giving the best promotion by selecting the good participants to work in this campaign.
I do not see any special thread ranking who is best manager of this forum.
If you personally ask the people who is favorite and best manager. You may see the yahoo62278 name from the various people. After him there many successful campaign manager available in the forum.

This summer, my friends are rolling out a new platform on the ratings of ICO. It will be necessary to give them an idea with a rating of bounty managers)

Personally, I came across different managers, but some of them were simply not tolerable. I think that there should be a strict selection for managers, because this is a very responsible job.

I saw that someone made spreadsheet with managers and campaigns but I have not seen any common ratings.

the ranking manager is not too influential while the value of investor confidence in the manager is still good, many good managers in bounty call it:
sylon
amazix
yahoo
and many more influential managers

I don't know if there are any rating system for them or not buy you can check out this thread. There are some more like this one. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3085997.0

I greatly appreciate the bounty management of the sylon, he has a team to test and evaluate the quality of bounty hunter work very professional. I like and participate in many bounty campaigns of sylon management.

I have an idea, let's in this topic to publish the information that we find on their own or those of other managers from various bounty kompaniy.Schitayu that in this way we can save ourselves from the bench more veroyatnosti. Some forum users will support me ???

It's only a list of good manager. That doesn't prove anything which the best manager among others.
Actually people have their own opinion which is the best manager for them, they will join on all campaigns which managed by different managers until they found the best and suits them well.

Quite an innovative idea,  it will go a long way to assist  and serve as one of the ways in decision making on what bounty to choose because the integrity of a bounty manager over time will be rated, hence it will boost confidence on the project they manage.

A survey about the managers regarding on their campaigns and bounties ? This is a good idea but is it fair for them? Im sure those people who got rejected by these managers on a campaign has a grudge on them. Managers have different strategies promoting an ICO and people should know that. But if that would be the case. I still vote for sir yahoo62278 for a fair and right management.

wow This is a very good idea. Can someone make a bounty manager ranking list?

This makes it easy for the newbie to find a trusted manager, avoid being scammed by scam projects

 ;) I know that in joining a campaign it will only depend on the project itself whether or not the campaign will be successful and profitable but I think the point is the higher rating the higher chance of income when joining their campaign. Of course those managers will do their research about the project before accepting the job and for the past camapaigns that I have with one of the bounty manager all of them are successful and I am satisfied with the rewards. :)

I'm more interested in why the forum has no way to influence their work. Why there is nowhere to send a complaint with the screenshots. Many managers do not turn to circulation, do not expose stacks. How to deal with them?

I think trust rating is enough to know who is the best manager because anyone can manage campaign of they want so it`s impossible to track the manahers and implement a rating system for them so see their trust rating before hiring them and there r already some well know managers r available so they can be considered as best.

I agree campaign managing is a very responsible job because they need to control the flow of people joining for bounty. At the same time, they need to keep track of the company activity whether they are reliable. Yes, we have to give them the rating on the basis selection of ICO projects.

great idea, with the rating of bounty manager, all host and bounty hunters can choose the good one for their bounties.

Yes of course there is, but I do not have it. I'm just battling three best managers: Needmoney, Sylon and Deadly which I think is best

I also agree with the idea, it can help inform investors who want to invest so as not to be wrong. also with the manager's rank can help bounty hunter get the best ICO. so that all parties are not harmed. hopefully, the idea can be realized.

I like the list of people who manage your good bounty campaigns. I also often participate in the campaign of Sylon, yahoo62278 and deadley, the rest I have not joined. I will refer more about the projects of the rest. Thank you for sharing this.

I will repost a new post on this topic, I'll give you a link to another thread where we talked carefully on the subject.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3571218.0

Until now we only to know how good bounty manager based on experiences and how many members joined in there.
I prefer amazix and accounts linked directly to ICO.

I have not met such a resource where the rating of all bounty managers would be presented. Without a doubt, if such a resource existed it would be very convenient, but I think that to make such a resource is very difficult because managers of bounty are many.

It would be nice if there was such a parameter as the rating of the bounty manager. At least for me, this is a very important parameter. I always pay attention to it before I start participating in the campaign.

Rating of bounty manager of this forum is enough, because this forum is best popular, where everyone discuss about crypto.

This is really a very good idea and I support it. Although some bounties that a good manager leads, may not be successful. From this no one is immune.
However, I still support this idea.

Good time.
In fact, I can not disagree with the fact that we need an anti-rating, together with a rating that will raise the level of confidence.

as always with such ideas There are both positive and negative sides. It seems to me that someone should display ratings, but also these possibilities someone can and abuse.

unfortunately there is not such a thing. but we gave it an evaluation score over all the projects we had done and we joined the bounty accordingly. but there is a good side. If we click on the negative trust, the profile is clicked. you can see if you are doing a scam project. The last 3 projects of a manager I have teamed up with scam. her moderator complained that their account has become a negative trust.

the beginning to find out is of the rating then if he got a negative trust or not. after that show, the enthusiasts of the bounty. that's my opinion

now bounty managers get a negative trust for SCAM projects, and now the rating of managers can change a lot

I do not understand the ranks of bounty managers, but have tried to join some trusted bounty managers, sometimes also get scams or scams.

I've never heard of such ratings but I've made my personal (mostly subjective) evaluation of the managers for the bounties I participated in.
For example, I know that bounty manager XXX never provides spreadsheets, so I wouldn't participate in any of his campaigns because in this way I am not able control my work.
And on the other hand I know that bounty manager YYY is always available and helpful - so it is a real pleasure to participate in the campaigns that are managed by him.

There are some ratings, but all of them are subjective in one way or another. Now even experienced managers have skam projects.

By clicking on this link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2845483.0) you can find useful information on choosing a company's bounty manager. There, a person describes the managers of companies in which he participated and their attitude towards bounty members and awards.

It seems to me that the whole point of choosing a Bounty campaign manager is to find an honest and decent person who performs his duties. But the quality of the company itself does not depend on it. Even good Bounty managers can also fall into the trap of scammers.

I see before that there is a topic listing all existing managers and rating them to rank. But that topic has disappeared. Evaluation of managers is a must. These assessments will help people have a more objective view of the manager as well as the projects they have been involved in. There are currently many ICO scam projects, causing huge losses for investors.

The bonus payment depends on the management of the ICO project and the bounty manager can not control so should trust the serious and reputable project management on the forum. To limit your participation in bad projects, it is important that the bounty hunter needs to do a thorough examination of the ICO project before deciding to participate in the bounty campaign of that project.

   I think we could see the bounty manager who is the best and well experienced through their rank position and if they have a lot of positive trust ratings. And also we can see the good manager if they manage the campaign properly and become active to the project they manage through bounty campaigns.

It's a good idea to think that Bounty managers will know what the Bounty manager rates are. Whether they are really trustworthy or not. So I'm so grateful that there is such a topic like this, it really helped to this furom. Thank you.

a good question but we can only refer to it because there are too many scam projects that the manager doesn't know yet. But I will also give some managers that I think the project they manage is pretty good: Sylon, Colorlessk, deadley,...

This is a good idea and can be helpful for bounty hunters and community in general. Also, this will ensure that bounty managers will do their best, be more responsive and be able to deliver bounty rewards on time coz there are bounty managers that just create a thread and that's all, they will just go back to the thread when bounty finish ..but not all, just some of them  ;)

Yes there is. There is a very good table showing almost all the managers and bounty that they do. And in this table you can vote for your favorite Manager. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3051158.0

Where would  you base the rating? To the success of the ICO, handling the participants in the bounty campaign he/she is handling? I mean it is hard to give a rating to anu bounty manager since they are all doing thier job. What if the ICO tunred into scam would you give a bounty manager a negative/low rating evenif he/she doesn't have anything to do with the project turning to scams. There are lot to be considered before givng an opinion or rating.

A good campaign managers have to be ranked senior member, hero member and legendary. Because they have the full knowledge of a project and aim to bring it to higher place.

When you are a long time to participate in bounty companies, you will already know from your experience with which manager you work best. I saw the ratings, but not always my personal opinion coincides.

I have long developed a rating, there are managers in the bounties of which I will not participate even if they threaten me with a gun. Recently, they painted the trust by the way, which says a lot.

You said it perfectly, I support you!. For whom should a good Manager be? for the creators of ICO or for hunters ? I think that ranks on the forum are more than enough. However, there may not be enough site that will only have a list of bounty managers and their companies that any newbie can choose him.

Agreed with this proposal , there should be a dedicated thread to know which bounty manager is best performer and which one only manage scam ICOs .
here i am not saying that even dump in ico will be treated as scam but some managers announce bounty for complete scam project which run away just after ico end and never show their face .

I think bounty manager should be ranked higher than our expectations. Now some bounty hire newbies and junior member to control a project this is totally wrong. Because not newbies and Jr member don't have sounds knowledge of promoting a project to higher place. Good bounty manager should be ranked legendary and hero member

I think for the official rankings may not exist, but I am used to make a benchmark on the trust they have, the more positive trust then I will believe it more than the manager who has red confidence

thats a good idea so the bounty manager will give extra power to get excellent ratings from participant each project

I just yesterday met a topic on the forum, where they discussed which bounty managers are the most popular. Many participants gave objective feedback with whom to work, and who is better to avoid. I can't remember the names of these managers right now, but I'll be back here as soon as I find this post...

Ratings with trust rating can't be that accurate when it comes on handling any campaign.
Remember that some people who have green trust are buyers and sellers with the risk of bitcoin.
For me, i have known some great campaign managers, because i followed their campaigns.
great handling in spreadsheets, easily to communicate, great haste in paying participants.



If the rating of a bounty manager is plenty high and eventually a crypto company will prove to be fraud, what will it change? By the way we see it so often!