|
Title: . Post by: air1 on August 15, 2013, 03:54:41 PM ;)
Title: Re: While I'm here Post by: 🏰 TradeFortress 🏰 on August 15, 2013, 03:55:20 PM No, btctalkaccounts.
Title: Re: While I'm here Post by: DarkHyudrA on August 15, 2013, 03:56:29 PM I think that I'll hide the Lending section, most of them are newbies and scammers looking for a loan...
Title: Re: While I'm here Post by: 🏰 TradeFortress 🏰 on August 15, 2013, 03:57:19 PM No, btctalkaccounts. *states the obvious* Hey TF, just a tip for future investigations, using Pastebin to keep track of your info is a bad idea. ;) Never used pastebin for that, wonder who did? Title: Re: While I'm here Post by: cornish_will on August 15, 2013, 04:21:41 PM I think that I'll hide the Lending section, most of them are newbies and scammers looking for a loan... What about the newbies who decide to lend loans??? Whats wrong with Newbies looking for a loan???? just asking not trying to upset anyone Will :-) Title: Re: While I'm here Post by: J603 on August 16, 2013, 02:50:20 PM I think that I'll hide the Lending section, most of them are newbies and scammers looking for a loan... What about the newbies who decide to lend loans??? Whats wrong with Newbies looking for a loan???? just asking not trying to upset anyone Will :-) Apparently post count is what matters for trust, even though the biggest scammers were not newbies. And those with huge post counts can just inflate it with useless quick posts. Title: Re: While I'm here Post by: DarkHyudrA on August 16, 2013, 03:09:59 PM I think that I'll hide the Lending section, most of them are newbies and scammers looking for a loan... What about the newbies who decide to lend loans??? Whats wrong with Newbies looking for a loan???? just asking not trying to upset anyone Will :-) Apparently post count is what matters for trust, even though the biggest scammers were not newbies. And those with huge post counts can just inflate it with useless quick posts. Rarely a newbie will have a good or any OTC or reputation in the forum. By being a Sr. Member or Hero has a higher chance of a history of successful trades. Title: Re: While I'm here Post by: J603 on August 16, 2013, 03:14:44 PM I think that I'll hide the Lending section, most of them are newbies and scammers looking for a loan... What about the newbies who decide to lend loans??? Whats wrong with Newbies looking for a loan???? just asking not trying to upset anyone Will :-) Apparently post count is what matters for trust, even though the biggest scammers were not newbies. And those with huge post counts can just inflate it with useless quick posts. Rarely a newbie will have a good or any OTC or reputation in the forum. By being a Sr. Member or Hero has a higher chance of a history of successful trades. Sometimes Sr. Members or Heroes do. But sometimes they don't. For example, I'm guessing if you asked for a small loan it would get lent without any questions, just because you are a senior member. However, you only have one transaction on your trust list. Title: Re: While I'm here Post by: CrazyBit on August 18, 2013, 01:38:06 AM Quote However, you only have one transaction on your trust list. More transactions are required to increase the trust.Title: Re: While I'm here Post by: J603 on August 19, 2013, 03:34:49 PM Quote However, you only have one transaction on your trust list. More transactions are required to increase the trust.Not always. I have never seen a loan request by a hero or sr member that got rejected because of lack of transaction history. For some reason, people think that no one would want to "lose" a high level account, despite the fact that these accounts have no inherent value. Title: Re: While I'm here Post by: nimda on August 19, 2013, 04:04:04 PM Quote However, you only have one transaction on your trust list. More transactions are required to increase the trust.Not always. I have never seen a loan request by a hero or sr member that got rejected because of lack of transaction history. For some reason, people think that no one would want to "lose" a high level account, despite the fact that these accounts have no inherent value. - High cost to create: hundreds of non-spam posts spread fairly evenly over a long period of time - Non-zero resell value However, can you point to an accepted loan request by a hero member who had no transaction history? Title: Re: While I'm here Post by: J603 on August 19, 2013, 04:36:03 PM Quote However, you only have one transaction on your trust list. More transactions are required to increase the trust.Not always. I have never seen a loan request by a hero or sr member that got rejected because of lack of transaction history. For some reason, people think that no one would want to "lose" a high level account, despite the fact that these accounts have no inherent value. - High cost to create: hundreds of non-spam posts spread fairly evenly over a long period of time - Non-zero resell value However, can you point to an accepted loan request by a hero member who had no transaction history? I can't even find a hero member asking for a loan request. However, my statement was that I've never seen a hero get rejected. I think that the burden of proof is on you. Title: Re: While I'm here Post by: nimda on August 19, 2013, 06:07:46 PM Quote However, you only have one transaction on your trust list. More transactions are required to increase the trust.Not always. I have never seen a loan request by a hero or sr member that got rejected because of lack of transaction history. For some reason, people think that no one would want to "lose" a high level account, despite the fact that these accounts have no inherent value. - High cost to create: hundreds of non-spam posts spread fairly evenly over a long period of time - Non-zero resell value However, can you point to an accepted loan request by a hero member who had no transaction history? I can't even find a hero member asking for a loan request. However, my statement was that I've never seen a hero get rejected. I think that the burden of proof is on you. Here, I'll help you: OgNasty loan request (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=276758.0) (Transaction history: NASTYMINING security) Scott J loan request (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=262594.0) (Transaction history: in thread) Tittiez loan request (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=265375.0) (Transaction history: lots - loans, moneypaks (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=127607.msg1355521), etc RandomQ loan request (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=159820.0) (Transaction history: lots - stocks (https://cryptostocks.com/securities/30), etc) Usagi loan request - NOT FILLED (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=250672.0) (Transaction history: lots, but sometimes dubious) So, here are some better statements to make: "I have never seen a Hero Member without transaction history request a loan" "I have seen a Hero Member get a loan request rejected" "I have seen a Hero Member get a loan request rejected because it made no sense" |