Bitcoin Forum

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1179238.msg12406963#msg12406963

Quickseller received 20 bitcoin from another scammer to legally petition my Canadian ISP for my information.

Quickseller took the coin, but never actually did anything.  :/

(This useless thread created as a response to all the useless threads he creates.)

Wow.. all these scam BTC you would think he could move out of his mothers gangbang house

Downright savage.

His problem with Lauda is just a problem with women. Due to the weekly gangbangs she has at her house. The house he lives at in the basement stil, so he hears the choo chop train every week and takes it out online at Lauda

Oh I remember this now... Either QS sent himself using the old TF account he probably controls, or was taking stolen $ from a huge thief... either way it's pretty scammy. ::)

He will probably reply: "Not as scammy as the extortion attempt you are involved in".

20 btc wasn't worth 200k back then.

There's no proof besides his word that he received it

How do you know he did nothing?

https://blockchain.info/tx/7547d946f9f622692d845bec3c220cbf323ee3750dd21632fce90ec03ba431ed

Because, he literally did nothing to Vod with it.

I gave him the perfect reason to come after me here.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1614573.0

He believed that my ongoing wish he kill himself was a direct physical threat.   ::)

Yet again, he literally did nothing to me with it - he just threatened other members.

*... not disputed....*

Well he still hasn't disputed it, so if he is not a hypocrite than since he didn't dispute it than he is guilty correct?

How do you know that TF controlled the sending address and QS owned the receiving one?

TF said he sent the transaction here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1179238.msg12407212#msg12407212

the 1GLados change address is known to belong to him. that adds some credibility.

the receiving address is not posted in the thread. QS said he received the transaction here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1179238.msg12406963#msg12406963

something interesting about the transaction posted above---it led to conclusively tying TF (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1184037.msg12460482#msg12460482) to the hashie.co exit scam from 2014.

Very interesting that QS still hasn't replied.

It's clearly not disputed.

Anyways, I just don't seem to find it good enough to spend enough time hating one another. Yeah QS did dodgy shit and yes he can be a pain, but usually the best thing to do with someone you don't agree with is leave them alone. No point talking shit about one another as we have probably already come to the point where we can see that none of this will help.

However, some people can also appear to be entirely different to their original impressions. Best if QS clears up any questions against him.

so why no refund QS?  what is this your lambo fund?

I didn't think your mum let you drive?

Quickseller should be banned from this forum.

So should you for being a scammer.

Quickseller is an annoying butthurt troll.

I aint a scammer.
I never scammed anyone.
Someone got over my account and scammed a filthy scammer or owner of soectrocoin.
Soectrocoin is a scam.
Someone scammed a scammer from my account..
Anyways leave it. I was ready to pay that scammed amount but sime shit called lauda red tagged me without hearing my side.

Somebody that leaves a trustrating with these words:

"you are mother fucker, I will creampie your mother and sister."

Is either retarded or a total retard. I think in your case, it is both things.

No response from Quickseller?

QS - Whether Vod sees this as a useless thread or not, his thread provides better evidence than threads you've created recently where you seem unable to show any real evidence, even though you've claimed to have it.
 
In this thread, I'm at least seeing a 20btc transaction coming from TradeFortress to you and no real evidence that you did anything with it. Which has a few implications and potential conclusions that you would draw yourself if, as an example, someone like Lauda were to do something similar in the past. I'm assuming you will have some decent evidence to defend yourself here and show that you did pursue a petition to the ISP and that this wasn't a fake transaction?  There would certainly be evidence of this?  

Also, just to check, will you be seeking my dox if I continue asking questions?   :-\

There allegations in the OP are so outrageous that they do not deserve to be acknowledged, to the extent that the OP is likely operating in bad faith (in multiple ways).

In fact, it is even mentioned in the OP that this thread is useless (has no basis in fact).


In those cases, lauda has explicitly acknowledged the allegations and attempted to derail the threads by trolling them. Further he very much implicitly denied the allegations both before and after he explicitly said he would not respond to the allegations, which is prima-face evidence that lauda was both trying to say that he denied the subject allegations and later claim he was not lying if/when additional evidence is presented to backup said allegations.   

How so?  You can't deny he sent you $200,000

You can't deny you didn't contact my ISP.

He paid you to do something that you did not do!

Now, are you going to send those coins to charity, or keep stolen goods?

Blockchain evidence

vs

Things Quickseller says

That's a tough one.

LOL.

No.

But it's hilarious, mostly in the hypocrisy department. "The OP is likely operating in bad faith (in multiple ways)" describes most threads QS creates. QS is basically admitting that he's trowing shit at the wall and hoping that "additional evidence" will surface at some point in the future.

to be fair, the title is a bit disingenuous. the allegation is that QS received 20 BTC from TF. at the time, BTC was trading ~ $230, putting the amount netted ~ $4600.

also, it's conceivable (perhaps unlikely) that QS claimed to have received funds but never actually did. we don't have evidence that he posted the address in question. he could have done this as a scare tactic. however, this doesn't explain the involvement of the TF account.


what was the actual agreement?

MOAR SKAMS!

QS is the lowest of the low, anyone you associate with is the same by default. I am greatly surprised that you haven't spent these coins yet..

so what are you going to do? man up and return the funds? send them to charity?

or just keep and become even more scummy?

I remember a while back that BadBear told me he used to be positive QS was TradeFortress, but then over time didn't believe it anymore. I wonder if there was any IP evidence tying them together somehow? I  think it's probably more likely QS bought that account than them being truly the same person but I guess you never know. If I recall correctly QS had thread trying to buy Donator/ VIP accounts at one point.

This is also possible:



Maybe TF just sent money to himself and gave QS an address to post publicly.

I took the implied accusations in this thread as an attempt to mock your recent threads, combined with possibly a bit of retaliation. I realize this thread may have been started for other reasons or to make a point, in a witty/mocking sort of way, but your threads have similar characteristics and I look for any facts or evidence you may present that is worth looking at, as I've done here.

As was the case with an outrageous claim about a pill addiction, you started it with zero evidence (but the possibility of good evidence) and ultimately just made statements about a secret source whom you would never name nor present any evidence the source gave you. Vod is starting this thread maybe with a bit of subjective mocking but also providing blockchain & post evidence showing TF sent you 20BTC for the purpose of a civil action lawsuit against Vod and you appear to have received it and never did anything with it. Is it your claim you did pursue a lawsuit or are you denying this transaction ever happened?  I'm curious what your stance is here?



How is this prima facie evidence?
I'll agree he began the same trollish-like behavior on these threads that have been done in the past with other threads attacking him, which could be interpreted as a hypersensitive reaction for someone who is frequently attacked with threads of this nature.
Lauda implicitly or explicitly denying the allegation is a denial of the allegation.
Whether he said he was or was not going to respond beforehand doesn't seem relevant.

When you finish with "and later claim", this has not happened yet, and appears like speculation, so I've disregarded the rest of this sentence until additional evidence is presented.
Could this be prima facie evidence if your speculation comes true, maybe if any evidence is strong enough, but one will never know because you don't seem to be willing to show any evidence and this comes off as prima facie evidence that you are acting in bad faith.

I must admit the circumstantial evidence is quite damning. Quickseller, what did you do with the BTC? I think you hoodwinked Tradefortress.

Nah, that's way too simple ;D

This is Quicksy we're talking about so the scheme should be appropriately wackadoodle.

Maybe there was an elaborate extortion involving voodoo dolls.
Maybe TF has a pistachio addiction.
Maybe QS had a brain transplant and TF was the donor.

Well, I'm clearly not up to the task, but if we completely disengage from reality à la Quicksy then there is no level of stupid we couldn't sink to.

Quickseller has here cadged valuable tutoring and consulting from me.  Compare the above to the underlined portions below, plus scores of other posts I made on the same and similar subjects.  Although he is misapplying the lesson insofar as Vod presented colourable evidence, that is not my fault; what matters is that he clearly used my instruction to craft his above-quoted response.

I do not give freebies; consider this to be my bill:  I deem my consulting in this case to be worth 1.31337 BTC.  Quickseller, tell me when you’re ready to pay for services rendered; whereupon I’ll post a fresh address.

Take notice that you must pay promptly.  Take further notice that if you fail to so do, I shall sue you in Internet Court and notify the management of Bitcoin to revoke your wallet.

---

Thanks for the public notice, Vod.  I did not know about the link between Quickseller and TradeFortress; though of course, I read a bit about TradeFortress in the forum archives.

Being new here, I need to ask a question:  Other than a select few such as Mr. Nasty and TradeFortress, is there any well-known forum personality (past or present) with whom Quickseller does not have a fight?

I ask, because I was trying to compile a list of Quickseller’s enemies.  Whereupon I realized that perhaps the opposite task may be easier:  Compile a list of those who are not so.

Really, I can understand making some enemies.  (Really—I of all people can understand that.)  But when someone does most nothing but, that may be indicative.

---

“They’re Quicksy and the Brain...” (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3003189.msg31089278#msg31089278)  (You did say “wackadoodle”.  Wait, TF is the Brain?)

/me munches pistachios.

I'm fairly new too (but used to lurk here without an account) but have skimmed though some of the infamous accusation thread in here. Pretty sure in the "Lauda removed from DT" thread TMAN or someone else mentioned a link between QS and Tomatocage. Now I have little idea how true the claim is or is not but I guess it would be safe to say there isn't bad blood between QS and TC. So there's one more in the "known" personalities I suppose

QS is a true stink nugget.

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=stink%20nugget for reference.

he has no friends other than the two mentioned above

I sincerely regret opening that link and then reading that description. The only question I have is why would someone go all that extent to define a term for something like that. What is the state of mind? Do they wake up thinking about the turd that stays stuck on their ass and wonder "I should define a term and lay the law that unwanted turds should only be referred to hence forth as a Stink Nugget" :'(

I believe that someone had the displeasure of meeting QS either online or IRL, then had a particular messy shit afterwards.. put two and two together and came up with the QS/Stink nugget combo?

Do not trust single word from this scam artist runing ponzi schemes and scamming around under his green trust rating.
Feel free to check his untrusted feedback and see who you are dealing with.
You were warned.

Wow, you are funny.  Do you also do stand-up?

https://web.archive.org/web/20180315002952/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3126248.0#msg32332066

https://web.archive.org/web/20180315002952/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3126248.0#msg32332407

/me reaches for his red paintbrush.

If you have 1 mil + in btc, why are you scamming people for 35,000?

Seems like a waste of time...

Hahah... Everyone should neg this Shit Nugget .... :P

Pleased to oblige.

Bumping since Quickseller continues to accuse others of wrongdoing, while holding onto stolen coins himself.  :/

Let's try and keep this on topic please.

Do you think he's retired and sitting on a beach with an ipad trying to troll everyone, or... I don't get it. why would some dude who claims to be rich be sitting around all mad at people and picking fights? I don't see either of us doing that, right? :P

Cheers! :D

I got a good chuckle out of this post.  *shakes head :D*

Anything involving courts and lawyers is going to take a long time.

Watching this thread for lols.

I'd actually love to see that happen, because my opinion is that scammers should be banned--like most respectable forums.  When he started taking two sides of escrow deals, and especially not disclosing that fact, he crossed over into true scammer territory.   Then he lied and devolved into a kindergartner trying to convince mom he didn't raid the cookie jar, all the while with a chocolate-slobbered mouth, fingers, and a crumb trail leading to his My Little Pony themed bedroom.

This forum has a nice little contingent of intelligent and honest members, and it is these people I enjoy communicating with.  And then there's QS who thinks he's John Nash at a simpleton clan's family reunion.  You know.  People who think a great escrow can be the same dishonest fuck you're doing a deal with.  Well it ain't like that. 

I think most of us see through QS's elephantine discourses, designed to baffle those who don't know any better--fortunately we do. 

And that red trust score speaks for itself.

I think i should give you merit for that because what you have said was very realistic. Either Am I wants quickseller out of the league. Oh wait I almost forgot upon watching your profile. It seems that you really Idolize him alot. Mind if I would like to ask if you and him uses the same lipstick?


by the way nice lyrics mate what's the beat anyways. "Togs tack togs togs tack"


Sorry, I just couldn't helped it.


Now back to the topic, I petty quickseller alot for receiving such a decent amount by doing nothing.  :(

Why no action is being taken on this scammer?

You are mistaken. In the thread I made exposing Lauda's pill addiction, I made it very clear what evidence I had, and I made no promise to break my promises of confidentiality by outing sources, who would no doubt be retaliated against shortly thereafter.

I also made it very clear that, even if my sources were to be named, evidence against Lauda would still be hearsay. I pointed out that those types of chat logs cannot be verified.

The evidence I presented was my word that I was personally told by someone I believe to be credible that he has good reason to believe that Lauda has a pill problem (I forget the specifics, they are in the other thread). You can decide to believe me, or you can decide that I am someone who should not be trusted, or you can decide that my judgment is diffident, and therefore even though you believe I am telling the truth about receiving this information, you do not find my evidence credible.


The title to this thread very clearly states I received $200k, which is a baseless accusation that does not warrant a response.



I would disagree with that. There have been many threads opened by people who have received a negative rating by lauda who opened threads attempting to discuss said rating that were met with trolling. Surely you believe in a person's right to defend themselves, and their actions?

I would say that lauda is the subject to attacks because he is a bad person. He is a criminal. He tries to take money/property that does not belong to him. He takes strong affirmative steps to silence his critics. He has endorsed and advertised for companies that are very clearly scam attempts. The list goes on....

It is relevant because it very much gives him a way to argue he was not lying regardless of the outcome. Also, he did not say he will not deny the allegation and subsequently change his mind. He said he will not respond after an implicit denial (and a very weak one at that), which would give credibility to a denial of lauda that he was in any way denying that he has a pill problem. 

Fixed Bozo...

Does it warrant a response now?   ::)

Surely this should be very easy for Quickseller to dispel this by simply denying that he received 20BTC. However he has failed to do this. Why do you think Quickseller would not quickly deny that he received 20BTC?

Well, I guess others can interpret the lack of a denial/dispute themselves.

tl/dr: no denial of any kind of receiving 20BTC , the evidence currently presented would be easy to refute, however Quickseller chooses to not do this, likely out of fear he will be proven to be a liar.

---

Better not forget to list my sources:

Why haven't you shared your sources and/or evidence with a trusted member who could corroborate your story?

Okay fine.

Yes I received 20 BTC from TF for the purpose of pursuing civil litigation for a defamation lawsuit against Vod. It was worth about $4,500 at the time (our agreement was based on the USD of the BTC received). The agreement was that I would return any amount unspent after 6 months (I think that was the timeframe) to a specific address.

For reasons I prefer not to state publicly, during the course of due diligence about the situation, certain information was discovered and I told TF that even though I believe someone in Vod's position should be held accountable for his actions, pursuing civil litigation would be against public policy. TF responded by saying that he has other projects/priorities he would rather use the BTC for, and I asked for a signed message requesting the return of the BTC he wanted returned, with a stipulation that sending said amount of BTC to him would absolve further obligations of me to return any BTC to the above mentioned address within the signed message, he provided said signed message, and I promptly returned the BTC.

The specific reason I do not want to state publicly would not affect my reputation, and would make Vod look bad....although I don't particularly like Vod, I think this is the right thing to do.  Given sufficient pressure from those whose opinions I value (and Vod), I may change course. I would give particular weight to Vods pressure because it involves him personally. I will give no weight to what idiots like o_e_l_e_o and suchmoon have to say.


Although I previously opted not to pursue litigation regarding defamation in the past, I continue to reserve all rights. Five thousand dollars is not that much to me anymore, and if it really means all that much to Vod, spending that much on a defamation lawsuit against him would not particularly burden me. 

Being an idiot, I can see only a word salad with some thinly-veiled threats sprinkled in ("would make Vod look bad"). Also quite noticeable is a distinct lack of proof for the refund, but that's not unusual with Quicksy.

Quickseller kept the coin.  He is simply lying again.

The reason he will not sue me is also a lie - if he reveals his identity, he will be hit with multiple lawsuits for all the scamming he has done ...  :/

I have not scammer anyone, ever. This includes TF, I followed through on the terms of my agreement with TF, as modified (the terms of which were proposed by him), and he was happy at the conclusion of out transaction.

Don't even try to provide proof of anything you say. We can't handle the truth.

Riiiiiiiiight. I'll just leave this here (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bogus_escrow):

"In the bogus escrow scam, a scammer sets itself up as the recipient of money or goods and then requests the use of an escrow service which is self-operated."

whatever went down with TF, there's no way he would sue quickseller. that payment to quickseller tied TF to a cloud mining exit scam, so TF be like

https://media.giphy.com/media/4pMX5rJ4PYAEM/giphy.gif


to be fair, this is from the same paragraph:

there is a difference between a) the buyer being defrauded entirely and b) the buyer being defrauded out of an escrow fee he intended to pay anyway. that wikipedia article is about the former, not the latter.

Is that alia?

It would be most appropriate to remove the "not disputed" tag in the title of the thread, as this is not accurate.

Realistically, it would be appropriate to add a [resolved] tag as this has been shown to be unsubstantiated and false. 

Shown? It was just you saying things, nothing was really "shown".

Realistically, it has been proven via blockchain that you took 20btc.
You did not return the coin and you did not do the work.

Please provide the proof you returned the coin, as you are known to lie.  :/

You forget that Quickseller's definition of "proof" follows the same rules as his definition of "scam": inconsistent, different depending on whether we are talking about him or everybody else, and modifiable as and when he desires.

I thought this was a joke but Quicksy isn't really known for his sense of humor... so he might be actually thinking that he could be a moderator:

Didn't he just post he doesn't spend that much time on that account anymore?    ::)

Hey Quicksy, if you are looking for a project to dump those 20 stolen coins and redeem yourself a bit, check my signature.  :)

If this is a serious advice; I'd like him to contact BTCforJoe (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=557989), for he runs a community kitchen and feeds the underprivileged families which is actually a commendable task and it would possibly be the most humanitarian act that QS could do with those 20 BTCs.


P.S. Vod I can't find accounts of quite a few members on the site; e.g. http://dev.martinlawrence.ca/bpip/search.aspx?q=suchmoon are you updating something?
https://i.imgur.com/3aFeK6e.png


EDIT :


[1] Thanks I got it.

[2] What the...  ???

Look at the line "BPIP Parsing Progress:   225,733 (11.02 %)"

That tells you the largest number we have parsed so far.   If your ID number is higher than that, we haven't processed it yet.

My website was hacked after I made this thread, promoting Quickseller as an elite hacker.   ::)

Whomever did it, elite may be going a bit far considering sql injection is probably as common these days as winnuke was in the 90's :P  

I am fairly sure that Vod is rejected by women when it is 365 days from the last Christmas (eg he doesn’t get rejected on Christmas Eve, on leap years, when some women are feeling extra *charitable*).

Surely this is the fault of Jesus. ::)

Thx man.   :-\

I will continue to remind people that you hold onto 20 stolen bitcoins, and you lied about returning them.

... interestingly enough, TF has returned, and has apparently sent 6.3BTC to OgNasty..


wtf?

Hahaha.... Coincidence?   :P

Now... Nothing at all shady about that... Wait... Doesn't QS own the TF account?  ::)

Briefly messaged Quickseller last night.

Has has ZERO interest in returning the stolen coins, and is just waiting for everyone to get forget so he can once again claim he has never scammed.  :/

I feel as long as you and some other key members are around and fighting against that he has no chance of anyone forgetting. I do not understand why you are still messaging expecting different results though.

There probably isn't any scam here. Either Quickseller has always been Tradefortress or he just controlled the Tradefortress account at the time of the deal and he just sent the coins to himself just to try shit you up (or he never controlled that address in the first place and TF sent coins to himself).

Against what public policy?

I find it a little hard to believe you would not disclose information that could make Vod look bad, are you willing to state this reason privately?

I assume there is a signed message and transaction from that time proving this?

Quickseller has such low morals he even uses children to forward his agenda.  :/

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2028469.msg20239127#msg20239127
"It is my understanding and belief that Martin Lawrence is a pedophile."

What's more - he complains instantly if anyone uses his real name, but he has no problems using my real name and calling me the worst name in the book...

Well Quicky, I have your name, tracing down your location - things are soon going to get as real for you as you made them for me.  

Anyone who uses children the way you do deserves to be punished as harshly as possible.

And right before that comment, in the same post:
Where is the beyond any doubt proof of the pedophile comment? Vod has certainly disputed the statement/charge... so doesn't this post seem a little contradictory?

Quicky is a literal narcissist.  One of the worst trust ratings (THE worst if we believe he was actually TF) yet he goes around on the forum giving advice to others that he does not follow himself.

Yet, despite all his scamming and all his lies, he still has positive trust from people.   ???

I read over that thread about child porn.  Pedophilia only concerns someone that hasn't reached puberty.  In nature when a human reaches the age where they can reproduce they are considered an adult.

I have a background in science so I don't follow stupid brainwashing by mainstream media.

Quickseller dude you can't claim that you won't state things publicly which would make Vod look bad when you have already called him a pedophile in public and may I add without any evidence to back up that claim at all. Not only have you made a bold statement but you have not backed it up with a single piece of evidence either.

Then  you have the audacity to say you won't state anything publicly because it would make Vod look bad. I'm sorry but  ??? ??? ??? ???

Vod is also a pedophile not only a shitposter, I saved the cache of the report on ripoff and already reported him on the following websites:

http://www.solvecrime.ca/
http://vancouver.ca/police/contact/report-a-crime.html

I suggest everyone to do the same make a research yourself on google or ask me in pm

And what evidence have you supplied to them? Because I might be missing something here but it looks like you are blindly following the accusations rather than validating the proof (there is no proof)

Your negative trust that you left on Vod doesn't back up anything either and just makes people laugh at the poor attempt of slandering someone. All those comments on that site scream out fake.

I sent them his info, the report from his coworker, the ripoff cache and the 4chan archived thread

If they can't come up in finding a crime they may investigate his online activity, I will make a report to some of the major ISPs in Canada just to draw more attention to it

Using children to forward your agenda makes you one sick freak. 

You will tell this to a judge

Only if you identity yourself, at which time your parents become bankrupt.  :)

That site is complete bullshit that does not provide any bit of proof what so ever. The only thing it does do is claim that Vod is and does not back it up with anything. Just because something is on a website does not mean it is valid.

Also the comments section looks like complete bullshit to me too. None of the comments are verified via ID and could very easily be faked. Just have a look at it and you can post a comment if you wanted too.

ISPs? What are they going to do? If there was any substance to any of these claims Vod would of been in an ongoing investigation with the authorities and if a few people from the internet can gather 'evidence' then the authorities would of already nailed him.

Give up spreading false information. Its the lowest of the lows to accuse someone of something like this.

According to ripoffreport, you sent them information and content that should not be relied upon... and the accuracy of the information you sent them relies on anonymous authors and commenters.  ???
https://www.ripoffreport.com/terms-of-service

I'm sorry but I really don't understand why the website ripoff report is being treated as something reputable. Literally anyone in the world can make a report there and none of it is verified. Get out of here with your grasps for attention.  You have thought of the worst thing possible in your mind and just thrown shit at a wall and hoped that some of it would stick. It has not and anyone supporting your claims should be discredited immediately.

It's not.  I believe the only people that continue to insist I am a pedo are people who were probably abused as a child.  :(

It certainly would explain Quicky's narcissistic behavior - sexual abuse fucks people up.

You have a higher threshold than me. If someone went to this much length to try and slander my name then I really don't know how I would cope. They have obviously made a fake report on that piece of shit website and tried to pass it off as fact. I just looked at the comments and they are obviously fake it is almost hard to keep in the laughter if it wasn't for the serious accusations which are being tossed around. That is even if you can call them accusations at this point. I think we can just refer to them as blatant lies from now on.

Looking at that website they seem to invite reports like these which are nonsense because they try and plug their "defendant" services which they vow to clear your name for a set fee. That site is a JOKE. A complete and utter joke.

Meh.  Everyone has their strengths and weaknesses.  I don't cope well with gullible people who spam their religion.

A fake report on an extortion website being promoted by known scammers?  Easier to deal with... 

Besides, getting angry at an anonymous person is foolish.  They only lie because they are anonymous.  Identify them, and they will shut right up.

That's why I'm proud to have my identity known.  It would keep me honest, if my morality already didn't do so.  :)

You sound upset. Are you having problems with the ladies (or a particular lady)?  Don’t take it out on me  ;D

I think I figured it out. Quicksy is Vod's ex-girlfriend. That would explain EVERYTHING.

Quicksy would be a woman, not a lady. 

I only date ladies.  :)

Ok, back to the drawing board.

One of these days I'll get it right I'm sure.

Is that a "yes" on the lady problems?

Can you start a new thread in reputation about my lady problems? 

This thread is about you scamming 20 BTC  I understand your need to deflect, but that won't work long term.  :/

You recently lied about returning the coins.   Why?

QS has returned the bitcoins back to me, as requested by me on mutually agreed upon terms. Here is the relevant portions of the email exchange.

Me:


QS:


Me:


To which QS returned and the matter is considered settled.

Will Quickseller be confirming these messages so others can at least partially accept their validity? 
I'm not going to comment on anything at this point until confirmed as there may be some games being played here. Go figure. ::)

Wait.... Do you think QS could just be talking to himself over two different accounts?  :o  ::)

Didn't Quicksy claim that he backed out due to concerns about Vod's privacy? Doesn't sound like that at all in those supposed messages.

Anyway, without a dated signed message this is just a ridiculous trollery by one or two bright red scammers.

That was my first thought, but I don't know if there's any proof for that.  I would spin around on my head giggling like a school girl if it could be proven.  That amount of bitcoin always struck me as ludicrous to be sending for a service like what it apparently was, and QS pulling off such a puppet show wouldn't be out of character for him.

There's probably no concrete (or public) proof linking them together, but BadBear once told me years ago that he was 'almost certain' they were the same and this was before this potential vod lawsuit deal shenanigans. Personally, I'm not sure if they've always been one and the same but I find it more probable that QS just bought the TF account or at least controlled it at one point (and maybe still does), but that's just my opinion.

::)

Probably being the operative word. That doesn't mean he doesn't think that you and tf are or have always been the same person. He might say the same if he was asked directly about that.

1- you fraudulently altered that quote and enough people know the area where I live and the area TF lives for it to be reasonable to say we are not the same person.

2- you know very well that theymos cannot say without a doubt that an account is being run by it’s original owner so you are basically saying that because you speculate something that you have zero evidence of cannot be disproven it must be true. That is the exact kind of logic that would make me question their judgement.

3- BadBear confirmed years ago I have no unknown alts, which you choose to ignore.

If you're referring to this post then you're the one choosing to ignore some important aspects of it:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1171059.msg12358580#msg12358580


Besides you've had many suspected alts surface after that statement was made so it doesn't mean anything today.

1) Fraudulently altered lol. I put the square brackets in to emphasise that what he said doesn't mean you are two different people. In fact, if theymos is of the opinion that you're the same (which he may or may not be), then it would back up what BadBear said.

2) Of course it is speculation, but as I said before I really don't care on how you perceive me or my judgement.

3) See what suchmoon wrote, but which BadBear statement should we take as gospel? The one when he says there's no alts, but disregard the one where he thinks you are tf? This is probably one of those things that is pointless even discussing because without concrete proof either way then all it is going to be is speculation, but let's not forget admins have access to more info than we do and there's obviously more going on here than meets the eye.

Take a look at my trust rating and compare it to yours, Quicksy.  :)

You recently lied about returning the coins - why?

Oh, please.  You already question the judgement of people who don't approve of your sockpuppetry and the notion that a person can be involved in a deal and also escrow the deal--and whether you question that judgement or not is absolutely irrelevant to any of the people with brains on bitcointalk, because they already know not to deal with you, because of your shoddy judgement.  And I would say that's accurately reflected in your feedback score.

Quickseller will only "broadly agree" to the discussion shown by Tradefortress, so I don't know what details may be debated moving forward.

It appears the actions that Vod was going to "be held responsible for" was attempting to alert others in the community about a fraudulent escrow operation that was being run and letting them know their potential rights for a refund, he used the word "anyone", which apparently applies to *all* escrow customers, instead of certain scammed escrow customers, and this is what Quickseller wanted to go after Vod for?     Doesn't it seem much more likely it was because Vod hurt a fraudulent escrow operation?   Sadly, I'm not sure Quickseller even sees it as fraudulent behavior... but it is. It is clearly deceiving others for financial gain, not to mention trust abuse.

This is all just pathetic. If Vod were this bad of a person, Quickseller has to be a coward for not pursuing. Regardless, the reality seems to be that Vod was trying to spotlight an escrow scam, QS and/or friends got upset (personally & financially) and went on some sort of personal vendetta since then.

Quickseller was too cowardly to reveal his own identity because someone who has charged escrow fees to members who thought they were getting a level of financial security they were not really getting (fraud), would never risk their own identity, because it would likely open up those scammers for legal actions against themselves which would likely financially outweigh anything they could potentially get out of suing Vod, not to mention potential time in prison.

One thing seems clear, Quickseller is fine with accepting known scammers as valuable allies for whatever motive he may have at any given time, which I think shows his character, and an extreme lack of integrity.


The fact that Quickseller's spin on this nowadays is "I had a heart for Vod's mental disorder", again, shows the character and lack of integrity, honesty, etc.

Quickseller, how many faces you got man?  https://youtu.be/ddKlCSe3OAY?t=5s

Of course Quicksy still thinks he's a "very trusted" escrow. For TF. For 20 BTC. Can't make this stuff up.

You mean like (taking a totally random example here) claiming someone has a pill addiction with no evidence whatsoever, and since it cannot be disproven it must be true? I would agree that is exactly the kind of logic that would make me question someone's judgement.

That is ridiculous. Courts have a standard practice against punishing people for crimes, including murder under similar logic - this includes refraining from finding guilt under these circumstances.


More ridiculousness. Privacy and the right to anonymity is a fundamental right protected by the US constitution and is a valued ethos of the forum. The overwhelming majority of people that conduct any kind of business on the forum conceal their identities (those who do not conduct business have an even greater percentage of anonymity), including those with significant trust and authority. Even the mods, including the global mods are allowed to keep their identity secret from even the administration, even if this means they can conceal income and assets so they can continue to receive welfare transfer payments from the government.

And again, it's OK if someone else's privacy is violated by you (as you constantly flood my trust page with my real name and the pedo story you made up).

You should be protected by fundamental rights - but no one else should.

Right Quicksy?

Your story is weak and yet another lie.

 ::)

Quicksy the constitutional scholar ::)

The right to anonymity doesn't extend to defamation. Which seems to be your main activity on the forum these days. Only a matter of time until you get someone to test the limits of your anonymity.

Dude. Get a grip and stop rehashing old shit. Nobody cares and nobody wants to see this shit bumped over and over .... It's 2020, not 2018. ::)

Evidence has no statute of limitations

Just stop bumping ancient threads. Make a new one and post your accusations, not other peoples from years ago. ::)

Let everyone know what a scamer Quickseller is

He is -14.  You are -17.   Tell us how bad he is, remembering you are worse.  :/

Locking this thread.  I did offer to remove the feedback from his account a while ago (small steps) but he could not show he returned the coins.