Bitcoin Forum

Hi all, i understand that some bounties for signature gives $5 per post in coin value and some gives like 100 stakes depending on the rank.

But which is honestly a better selection or choice? Thanks in advance

I think the stake is better, because it can get more tokens / coins.
the second reason is, depending on your process.
Whether you are in compliance or not.
if appropriate then there are results.

I prefer bounty with stakes rather than bounties payment in usd value. If the bounty pool is huge you will get more payment when the pool is dividend. Another option i can consider is if it will be paid with bitcoin with $5 per post.

I will choose $5 per post. My reason is that $5 per post what i get the value is already being determine and i do not have to take the risk of whether the price will rise or drop like what you are getting for stakes. If you feel more adventurous you can consider stake also but is is a bet as you will not know the price till it launch.

thanks alot for the sharing. Currently trying out $5/post for 20 post max per week for a start.

And saw one 100 stake/w hence am thinking which is a much better choice

I have not had any completed bounties yet hence I am unable to judge how much does the stakes relates to even if its 100/w for my rank

Do not pay attention to it, just take part in many projects. See payments going in your myetherwallet.

Participate in the current signature bounty in which I am participating, its gonna be a huge profit. (just 1 week left until the bounty ends)

Some bounties pay in BTC also.
Paying fixed value good for fast income, you know how much you earn.
Stakes earning depends how many peoples in one bounty and we dont know how much will cost each token in final, its good for hodlers

First it depends on the total allocation for the signature bounty. Most of the mangers give it around 40%. After that the next thing that matters is how much the company has been able to raise. Suppose a company raised 100mn dollars, and out of this, 2% were reserved for bounty. So there would be 2mn dollars available for bounty participants. Now out of this 2mn, 40% were for signature, then 80k would be divided to the participants depending upon the stakes.
So you cannot really make out which would be more profitable.

I prefer a signature campaign that gives $ 5 per post, if maximum 30 signatures, I can earn $ 150 per week, I think it's more profitable for me,gift giving with usd looks more clear.

i prefer to get stakes rather than getting usd. because it all depends on the project that we follow, if we use usd per post, then we will lose the opportunity to earn more money. especially if the project has a very big value, would be a disadvantage for us if only rely on usd per post

For me it doesn't matter either in $ or token as long as the project is looks good in terms of its purpose and having the potential of its developments in the future. Another is the allocated budget which differs on each in every project.

It really doesn't matter much to me. It all will end up in proper use anyway.
But for all I know, most of the projects I participated in offers payment in tokens and not in USD.
I can earn USD in some other ways, like daytime or office jobs, but it cannot give me cryptos in any way.
So may be, at some point, I prefer earning cryptos.

I do totally agree with you Sir. I also prefer signature campaigns that pays $ per post if they were available. I've got to see my earnings even before ICO ends. If a campaign pays in tokens or stakes, i am always in deep thought whether the equivalent value is satisfying or not especially if there were so many participants. But nonetheless the very first thing i am also most particular about is the total allocation for the signature bounty.

I think stakes are better

When you say it that way, I wold then prefer earning stakes than USD. Surely, we can earn it daily in our office or any other facilities/stores/agencies that require our services. But any of those don't offer earnings in cryptos.
And crypto is highly volatile, despite that, if you are clever enough, you can earn satisfying profits from it.
So, yeah, I prefer it in stakes.

Appreciate all these inputs! Let me test it out for the bounties that I have on hand with those stakes on hand.

After which i can decide which is worth but of course I had to agree having Stake with high potential project and especially with good ranking will give you more.

When you are paid a fixed fee you can accurately calculate how much you will receive. However, in most cases it will be more profitable to receive stakes. The award for the signature is 30-40% of the total pool for bounty. Maybe it will happen that the number of participants will be small and in that case you will receive a much higher payment.

I personally think that stake it is better because they can make a lot more money.

I think Stake is better and more equal than giving a fixed amount per week. Many projects have a small amount of people participate, then they have the right to earn with a fixed bounty pool

There is no right decision. When your reward amount fixed in USD, you will know how much money (in tokens) you will get in the end of bounty. But with stakes you won’t know it until the end of campaign.

Based on my experience i can tell that stakes system is better. Mostly, the signature campaign reward is much bigger then 5$ even for Jr. Member.

It all depends on the company and the Manager. It is very difficult to predict income in advance. Such a lottery  ;D

Getting your reward in stakes is more preferable to collecting USD. When stakes are converted into token and then you trade the token in exchange, you can get more than what you should have gotten in USD.