Bitcoin Forum

CP3U- Now Mine Bitcoin, Litecoin, Quark , or any similar coin!!! 64 Bit Windows

Win64 Only!

10/30 Added CryptoNote / Monero miner

These are 64-bit hardware-specific miners! Please choose the one that matches your cpu!

Examples:




Use at own risk, test with backed up wallet/dir. Not responsible,  Due diligence, make sure review source

Minerd.exe will show up as a virus in some cases, although this is a false positive! (descendants of Pooler's Miner will have same detections)

Downloads:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/philosopherstone/files/QRK/

Source:
https://github.com/palmd/Cp3u

Intel:
First Optimizations
http://s12.postimg.org/zai453prx/old1.jpg

Improved Version
http://s22.postimg.org/hmysm125t/new1.jpg

Improved Version 2
http://s28.postimg.org/bwkbm3g7x/image.jpg

BTC donations for development of projects - thanks!
http://phstones.com/images/donateBTC.PNG

Easy P2pool mining:
Neisklar's P2Pool - 3% fee

http://176.221.46.81:8372/static/

Example command-line or to place in .bat:


1) replace QV41kKfw9L6qNr43SNRFci9HzgsxeJf5yh to address you would like your quark sent too.(do not replace :x)

2) Profit! you will see payments coming into the address you specified in 1.

so the miner is the wallet? how does that work? or are we supposed to use the miner from august?

This is just an optimized standalone miner, you also need the client, please get that from the main Quark thread. In the link above I made new files for multiple types of CPUs. See my message above on how to mine with the p2pool. (work in progress)

Will update it with solo mining instructions as well  ;)

2 question:

1) Is it going to work with pools ?

2) how can it be run under linux ?

yes it works with pools, please see my first response above, I have tested the clients using p2pool.

I will release some more variants, and the faster client as soon as I can.

Thanks I got it to work :) This is my first attempt at mining so your guide was very helpful!

Thanks, Solo mining is a bit difficult now so I added .bat and .txt file to make it easier to setup using p2pool

its not working on my machine

What cpu are you using?

I added .bat files to https://sourceforge.net/projects/philosopherstone/files/QRK/

download Win64_all.zip (again) and run the .bat - tell me what happens.

should work on most every chip.

AMD,
and i'm using win64_all

it getting started, but after some seconds, it crashed and windows trying to close it.

Which AMD chip is it?

Athlon II X2

Try legacy I added it to
https://sourceforge.net/projects/philosopherstone/files/QRK/

If that doesn't work your not 64 bit win or the chip is too old to use sse2

Have updated files once again to fix small bug report, can try them if you are having problems.

Will release the even more optimized clients when possible

Thanks, Will give them a try!

X

thanks mate we need to get mining out more to the lower Tech i will Tip as soon as i can - Cryptsy seems semi functional - i have a little Qrk on there my other Qrk is cold -

my only request if o have not done it already is can you post it on our forum - it will be very useful there  i might make an actual  "mining" section - i'll go look

Cheers. 

Thanks!  Running it now without any issue.

The Athlon II series most definitely supports it, sse2 was introduced in the Athlon 64.

Yep this miner can get out to everybody,.. not to shabby to make $30+ a day mining on a decent computer using 25 cents in electricity per day either  ;D

It reports like this:

Ya I saw it when I looked it up - the only flag in the legacy version is for sse2

Any luck with it?

Are you seeing


Those should go by pretty quick if its working correctly.

Try it with http://qrk.coinmine.pl/

I put the batch in the files (may need to dl again) to mine with this pool now as it seems to have better latency. Also check your CPU usage.. should be running near 100% with default settings

is 176.221.46.81 your pool?  that gets super high # of DOA

No, that is some p2pool I found...easiest to set up, no account needed, it does pay on time but I recommend http://qrk.coinmine.pl  (not p2pool)

I've only tested for a bit on vishera (bdver2), which works fine.

Still solo mining with gpus though, ~ 75 watts for 2+ mh/s from caymans.

Thanks for testing,  I also tested the bulldozer one on 8150, 4300, I did test out a piledriver one too.. maybe 10% increase, maybe not. I'm pretty sure you can push 1.5m on a 8350 @ ~125w.. Id love to get some numbers on a 9590

There is some room to do more improvements on the code still.

thanks, it worked greatly.

Now, is there any linux version i can find? maybe a source to compile ?

That's exactly what I'm seeing. But does that mean it's working? Why does it not report hashrate? Also, the pool you defaulted to is not indicating any hash rate for the worker.

Do you know how to fix that?... if you see a problem with that.

I took the "-q" flag out and saw some thread activity. But it didn't read like anything you posted above. Also, it indicated just a few kilohash, nowhere near 1MH. Maybe it was so low it would not register on the website.
I have a 3.40 Ghz Intel (SandyBridge) i7-2600 ... I'd have thought that would be a good CPU to mine with, but apparently not.

I've spent nearly half a day trying to figure out the scattered shoddy quark documentation across all these threads. And still no real success. Yours is perhaps the closest I've come to figuring something out.

I figured out my problem. It's kinda silly, but to help others, I'll describe what happened. I had my config file in my wallet set to automine. So, it was mining while the software was connected. Essentially, I had two miners competing for the processor. ALSO... I was using the legacy software, and not the i7 software.

It's mining at near 1MH. Some accepted values have been reported. Wow. This is a little bit of a relief.

Is there a GPU miner for this yet?... I'm kinda hoping not to avoid more headaches... and so we are all on the same playing field.

There is indeed a GPU miner but I think it takes a % of your mining, haven't looked at it.

10%. Kinda hard to solo at this point unless you have a lot of GPUs too.

Well I heard that GPU miner is solo only, with CPU  miner you can just put it on a bunch of cpus and point them all to your own client or use pools.

Its still profitable to mine so expect it to keep increasing  :)

Just for clarification purposes - new Intel = Haswell only?

I have that version working on both a 3770k and a 4770k, so no.

I just used the newest flag for haswell, although reported to me 5%+ faster it's in the margin of error and most likely adds nothing or near it since AVX2 is the only improvement I know of from the lesser build.

There is shortcuts to some of the algs in quarkcoin that I have not implemented in release d binary, but they are only about ~15% atm

best quarkminer is the minerd64_sse4.exe  from here : *Edited by SaltySpitoon* Link Removed due to virus warnings
the minerd64_sse4.1.exe didnt work, but the minerd64_sse4.exe  is fast and show the shares and i got double accepted than with the i7 here!!!

False + ?
Ad-Aware    Trojan.Generic.9705038    20131203
Agnitum    Riskware.BitCoinMiner!mabHpPndSNc    20131202
AhnLab-V3       20131202
AntiVir    TR/BitCoinMiner.Gen    20131203
Antiy-AVL       20131129
Avast    Win32:Crypt-OSW [Trj]    20131203
AVG       20131202
Baidu-International    Trojan.Win32.Win64.aYo    20131202
BitDefender    Trojan.Generic.9705038    20131203
Bkav       20131129
ByteHero       20131127
CAT-QuickHeal       20131202
ClamAV       20131203
Commtouch       20131203
Comodo    UnclassifiedMalware    20131203
DrWeb       20131203
Emsisoft    Trojan.Generic.9705038 (B)    20131203
ESET-NOD32    a variant of Win64/BitCoinMiner.E    20131202
F-Prot       20131203
F-Secure    Trojan.Generic.9705038    20131203
Fortinet    W64/BitCoinMiner.E    20131202
GData    Trojan.Generic.9705038    20131203
Ikarus    Win32.Crypt    20131203
Jiangmin       20131202
K7AntiVirus    Trojan ( 004828c81 )    20131202
K7GW    Trojan ( 004828c81 )    20131202
Kaspersky    not-a-virus:RiskTool.Win64.BitCoinMiner.i    20131203
Kingsoft       20130829
Malwarebytes       20131203
McAfee    RDN/Generic PUP.x!blp    20131203
McAfee-GW-Edition       20131202
Microsoft       20131203
MicroWorld-eScan    Trojan.Generic.9705038    20131203
NANO-Antivirus       20131203
Norman    Troj_Generic.QRECX    20131202
nProtect       20131202
Panda    Trj/CI.A    20131202
Rising       20131203
Sophos       20131203
SUPERAntiSpyware       20131202
Symantec    Bitcoinminer    20131203
TheHacker       20131202
TotalDefense       20131203
TrendMicro    TROJ_GEN.R0CBC0OK913    20131203
TrendMicro-HouseCall    TROJ_GEN.R0CBC0OIS13    20131203
VBA32       20131202
VIPRE    Trojan.Win32.Generic!BT    20131203
ViRobot       20131202

Im using minerd_w32_sse3.exe for my Q6600 and it shows the hashes and speed on every thead, i've created another worker for my laptop which is an i5-2410M 2.4Ghz to try to speed things up (just temporarily, while it's still somewhat minable, I dont wanto damage it). I was planning to leave it for the night and see if I wake up with results, but im only seeing "Stratum detected new block" all the time and nothing else. Is this normal? Why your version of minerd doesn't show speed and hashes? It would be better, it feels like you are doing something, since pool information on the websites is useless since it's always lagged.

Btw, about false positives, just always download the stuff from a thrusted source, but most antivirus are throwing miners as trojans these days.

Because I put the -q flag in the command line which means quiet, simply remove -q to see the hashes and madness.  With -q you only see stratum and shares submitted.

On laptops I would recommend using -t x , where x is cores-1 .. or have very good cooling!

Is this legit?

http://www.share-online.biz/dl/L78K8NRMGUG

I got it from there:

Any Linux version?

Thanks for this miner. Works great with coinmine.pl

I have successfully tested a vishera bulldozer, plus an older 4-core phenom X2

The older phenom needs the legacy.zip, or else it will crash.

Now both workers are visible in coinmine.pl but somehow coinmine.pl shows both workers with the same kilohash?

Strange. I get about 1.5 megahash with the bulldozer alone. But when I add the 4-core-phenom, coinmine shows
the exact same value (of like 800 kilohash) for each worker.

But the miner on my 4-core-phenom shows an average of 3-400 kilohash (in the commandline), so I don't understand what happens
here.

Maybe have to let it run for a day to see better average value at coinmine.pl.

hm, now my bulldozer is listed as inactive on coinmine.pl,...
But the commandline in bulldozer is still running, and showing correct values.

Is there something I have to adjust when I run many computers in the same home network?
Like different ports per computer or something?

LOL, every minerd.exe will give on many virusscanners results, even Urs, see here:

SHA256:   80c3daa3bab0105ead192bfdbd423c120a06bda6f7fac1d7332f201dc59012f9
Dateiname:   i7.zip
Erkennungsrate:    9 / 48
Analyse-Datum:    2013-12-07 12:31:22 UTC ( vor 0 Minuten )

Avast    Win32:Crypt-OSW [Trj]    20131207
Baidu-International    Trojan.Win64.BitCoinMiner.E    20131207
ESET-NOD32    a variant of Win64/BitCoinMiner.E    20131207
Ikarus    Win32.Crypt    20131207
K7AntiVirus    Trojan ( 004828c81 )    20131207
McAfee    RDN/Generic.dx!c2i    20131207
Symantec    Bitcoinminer    20131207
TrendMicro-HouseCall    TROJ_GEN.F47V1130    20131207
VIPRE    Trojan.Win32.Generic!BT    20131207


But thats the point :

NOTICE: Results are not 100% accurate and can be reported as a false positive by some scannerswhen and if malware is found. Please judge these results for yourself.  


links:

http://r.virscan.org/report/5832ee85219711b825f9208fd9ff5676.html

https://www.virustotal.com/de/file/80c3daa3bab0105ead192bfdbd423c120a06bda6f7fac1d7332f201dc59012f9/analysis/1386419482/

I came to the same conclusions you are.  However, the truth is different.  What I concluded after a week of observing is that your worker may not show as being "online" unless it just recently got a "block" accepted.  As for the khash/rates being off or not assigned correctly, I totally agree and I am still puzzled by it.  I would love for someone who is informed to comment, too.

The difficulty requirement is quite high now, I assume the pool raised it to lower demand on it's servers, since they were having problems earlier this week. This causes higher variance where you will show offline (if you haven't gotten share recently) or a very high mining rate, or low depending on how many shares you have submitted in the time frame the pool uses to calculate active hashrate, so this is normal

You don't need separate ports but you can try all using one worker (to 'smooth out' variance)

Pool is down for maint. now it seems so not sure if you can change the time window or not.

The rate shown in the miner is more accurate than the pool.  What hardware/cpu/settings are getting 1.5mh ?

I appreciate the updates but my machines are so old they are all using the legacy miner.  Any updates for that one?

Any luck with win64all_improved?

Here is experimental version, but I have no idea if it will show any improvements, let me know and will delete if not
https://sourceforge.net/projects/philosopherstone/files/QRK/

No, I just tried the 64 improved, it starts, then quickly crashes on my fastest processor the Phenom II X4 940 BE.

I'll try the experimental version.

Ok, the experimental legacy version runs at 109.75 khash/sec per processor.

The original runs at 120.76 khash/sec per processor on the Phenom II X4 940 BE.

try the AMD legacy one and post results =

111.52 khash/sec per processor

I have a question: I have a Intel Core i7 2600 3.4 GHz CPU. Which mine would be the "best" ???

Use the best one I'll delete the experimental

Test out i3i5i7_improved and old i7 one , see which reports higher.

Can't download i7.zip file. G-Data AV blocks the site.
I'll try the i3i5i7 one.

Thanks

Learning to mine here, and I guess I am currently mining for palmdetroit, now how do I set my address up in the .bat file for the win64_all version?
[Edit] Wrong file, trying improved version now

This seems a great innovation! Keep up the good work.

The included .txt file will tell you what to change, you can mine at the same pool or choose another, but yes make your own account.

Thanx man

posted the OP at the QRK forum mate thanks posted up your Tip addy also ! cheers !

[2013-12-08 01:27:06] thread 2: 1698191 hashes, 39.94 khash/s
[2013-12-08 01:27:06] thread 3: 250658 hashes, 40.89 khash/s
[2013-12-08 01:27:06] thread 0: 1469527 hashes, 38.46 khash/s
[2013-12-08 01:28:01] Stratum detected new block
[2013-12-08 01:28:01] thread 3: 2171140 hashes, 38.99 khash/s
[2013-12-08 01:28:01] thread 2: 2155430 hashes, 38.71 khash/s
[2013-12-08 01:28:01] thread 1: 2644721 hashes, 47.49 khash/s
[2013-12-08 01:28:01] thread 0: 1460809 hashes, 26.26 khash/s
[2013-12-08 01:28:19] Stratum detected new block
[2013-12-08 01:28:39] thread 0: 1575728 hashes, 41.87 khash/s
[2013-12-08 01:28:50] thread 2: 2116855 hashes, 43.49 khash/s
[2013-12-08 01:28:50] thread 1: 1536784 hashes, 31.58 khash/s
[2013-12-08 01:28:50] thread 3: 2319497 hashes, 47.65 khash/s
[2013-12-08 01:28:56] Stratum detected new block
[2013-12-08 01:28:56] thread 0: 273782 hashes, 45.29 khash/s
[2013-12-08 01:28:56] thread 2: 297297 hashes, 49.19 khash/s
[2013-12-08 01:28:56] thread 1: 279225 hashes, 46.20 khash/s
[2013-12-08 01:28:56] thread 3: 293593 hashes, 48.58 khash/s
[2013-12-08 01:29:30] Stratum detected new block
[2013-12-08 01:29:30] thread 3: 1668719 hashes, 48.51 khash/s
[2013-12-08 01:29:30] thread 0: 1555619 hashes, 45.21 khash/s
[2013-12-08 01:29:30] thread 1: 1692331 hashes, 49.18 khash/s
[2013-12-08 01:29:30] thread 2: 1574535 hashes, 45.75 khash/s

 This is what the improved win64 miner is doing for me, two shares so far, should I be getting more? or does it seem to be on track, thanx in advance

P.S. Do you think I should expect to see my hashrate and shares on coinmine,pl?

Yes, sorry, you are absolutely right.
The miner shows about 900 Kh/s when it says "YAYYY!!!"

The pool got all wrong, and often shows an average of 1.5 Mh/s...

So I suppose 900 Kh/s is the right value.

My exact cpu is an amd 8-core vishera piledriver. So it's not exactly a bulldozer, but I believe it's the successor of the bulldozer model.
It has 4 Ghz.
It runs best with the bulldozer-miner, and the improved version made it jump from 800kh to 900 kh.

Thanks.

The i3i5i7 seems a bit improved, getting a few more khash on i7 2600.

Hello,
I am trying and finally get it to work. I am using the i3i5i7_improved and now it is showing that it is running at about 50 khashes/sec..isnt it a lot slow ( i am using intel i5 4 cores). I am running it for 10 min now and shows 100% usage of the CPU , but on http://www.coinmine.pl/ it is not appearing as acitve yet...any suggestion?

OMG, please make something to reduce cpu usage, my temperature went from 50 to 95 when i was mining.

standard AMD A10 5800 (APU)
console reports about 390 kh/s (80-90kh/s/core) varies quite a bit

coinmine thinks differently, suggesting a hashrate of 224.

In 1 hour I mined .3 unconfirmed quark coins which convert to 3 cents per hour

which is disappointing

there is a command line switch to reduce the number of processors.  The switch is -t.  So at the end of your bat file you add -t 3  if you want to only use 3 of your quads processors.  This will reduce the core temp and obviously your overall hash rate.

@JuanHungLo
thx

I use http://www.coinmine.pl/qrk  and now i see:

Credit            Fee
0.12765842    0.00127659


and status of TRANSACTION HISTORY are all Unconfirmed.  When i can transfer that to my wallet? How much i need to wait?  (its noob question,plz understand)

Guess that experiment is over, mined several hours, to find out I do not really understand difficulty and I should never have attempted to mine this coin, how does coinmine pool work anyway?

Seems about 10-12% increase on the newer AMD and ~5% on Intels, I might put up a piledriver one later I have to see what they added, might do a steamroller too. I remember someone getting 1.2-1.3mh with 8350, but was heavily Oc'd and using the piledriver one

Only when you get shares will it show up on the pool

Is possible mining from a VPN with a fast CPU? Someone knows any VPS's web with good prices?

Best regards!

Palmdetroit,

my son has an i7 but he runs win32 (I know, I know) do you have a CPU miner for win32?
Or is the performance really poor?

digitalocean for vps, if you know how to setup vps to mine btc or any other currency please let me know.

'Nother 3-5% improvement has been posted. (v2)

keep getting "Access is Denied" on minerd from ALL quark miners.

pooler's cpu miner works fine.

windows 7 + core i5

why can the quark wallet not incorp a more efficient miner?

I think because the client bins are 32bit, could be wrong though. But probably could be done on a 64bit client, setting a bounty is the quickiest way to find out. I kind of remember trying to do a 64bit wallet back in August, will check. (most prefer standalone, even for solo mining)

Might be intervention from antiviral, the source is from poolers which is widely detected. Check AV logs

pooler's works fine on my machine. only quark ones seem to have trouble.
confirmed my firewall + AV software is off, no luck

Im using your i3i5i7_Improved2.zip. It crashes on launch on my Macbook via Bootcamp. It has i5-2415M CPU on 64-Bit Win 7

My hash did increase by 10 khash/s on each thread on my i5 2500k PC though :)

EDIT: I'm using win64_all_improved.zip and it works

Thanks for the info, I will try to put up win64_allimproved2 version

does the i3i5i7 older improved (not 2) work on the macbook?

I just tried i3i5i7 older improved and it crashes as well. Only win64_all_improved works so far.

superdooper. i3i5i7_Improved2 is ~4% faster than i3i5i7_Improved. Just tipped you some of the very first dust I ever mined :-)

What can I use for Linux?


Thx  ;D

by the way, see this posting with a measurements of
load, temperature und khash in relation to -t N with N=#threads:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=362559.msg3881767#msg3881767

Looks like some type of throttle on your speed

thanks will put out a new win_all

I tried to compile on Linux...


I get the following error messages:


it is a recently installed x86_64 Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.2.51-1
and I used this sourcecode:


Thanks for your help!

Added new win_all version 2 should increase speed for those running on the earlier version.

how can I use them with my win 32,: ( I'm new and I almost difficult to work installing the software miners

Hi,

I know it might not be in your best interest to support older hardware but i am having troubles getting my i7 960 to mine. I can get the miner running showing hash rate but no yay's are coming through.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks.

Microsoft Windows scam.

depending on the pool, and their difficulty, might be very rare to see a yay! on older hardware. Even on 2-3mh+ machines sometimes you don't see one for a few minutes. Also I think difficulty adjusts on the one pool so if you put a bunch of pcs on one worker you'll see even less.

It's in everyone's interest to have as many miners as possible. You are running fine now?

Use the source, Luke.

That was actually a very good advice... I have now 4 computers running with the same worker.

And coinmine.pl has no problem with it.

The total hashes seem to be about right.

I am now hoping to see a higher shares rate because of the "smoothing out of variance" (as you called it)...
but will have to wait a day or two to get better data.

It seems better...

Amazing. Thank you for sharing this.

your shares should be the same either way, it depends on the pool.  If you spread it out over many workers some will show 0 rate some will show normal , some higher, the pool is calculating that rate on a small amount of time, so if you get lucky and get many shares it will be higher in that time period, unlucky will show less. The more mining power you use the more it 'smooths out'.

OP, what are you running that gets you 2500KH? 

I'm not sure what I should be seeing for my CPU, just started reading on the Quark thing.  i5-4670 ~760khash/s is good?

Hello all,

Another fan that joins the comunity . Well atm im farming sexcoin with the gpu and quarcoin since i had that quad core doing nothing profitable q9550 at 333khs .

Cya.

I must be doing something wrong. On my Core I7-3770K I only get about 45 kh/s per thread using Improved2, far less using older versions, less than 1kh/s per thread.

What am I doing wrong? I am getting nothing even remotely close to the 2400 kh/s shown in the OP.

Any ideas?

just make sure you installed libcurl3-dev



redownload the source, I am using this repro:



then it should work, proceed:



I compile on LInux Mint 16, and it worked.

getting ~1.1 Mhash on i7-3970X
doesnt seem right to me...

strange i get on my i7  3770K only 650khash/s. Any advices?

 i7 2006K  OC 4.4GHz  98-94Khashs x Theard = 789|khsahs

Yes, 1.5 mh/s shouldn't be too difficult around the stock parameters. If I don't forget, I could provide you with the ~equivalent of 9590 numbers tomorrow since I keep my base clock at 4.7 ghz now (switched out the stock cooler that I was still using when I did the original test) and I should be able to reach 5 ghz without much trouble, lots of voltage headroom left when compared to a stock 9590. It's a decently binned chip. 

Yes please post, this is the CPU that uses 225-250watts?  Look forward to your response

edit: also let me know if you want a Steamroller specific build

is there any chance to compile a win32 version?
i'm using q9550 with win32 and i cant install a 64bit windows on it
thanks

I believe the wallet itself is 32 bit? and can solo mine, at a reduced speed.

yes, but what about mining in a pool?
considering the difficulty, i think it doesn't worth to mine solo

I have been using the Win64_all for about three weeks and then about 3 days ago it started spiting out errors. and then very strangely the minerd.exe just disappeared from my comp.  When I try to unzip it again from the zip file it will not unzip, even though it still shows in the zip file.  I turned off my virus prog in case it was that but same result.

If I try to download the file again from SF it always comes down corrupt.  I tried all the other files.  They will download but all crash as soon as they are started.  Is this just me or is anyone else experiencing this too.

Update:

Now Mine Bitcoin, Litecoin, Quark , or any similar coin

Can you implement for Vertcoin too ?

Add Intel-Haswell Optimized for testing

https://sourceforge.net/projects/philosopherstone/files/QRK/

also i removed some redundant dll's - if you have one missing pm or post here I can re-add them in!

Also another 1~2% speed increase for the others, and new binaries that should not pop false positives (for now).

Am using minerd with the quark switch right now, getting 60-80 hashes per core on my i5. Can you tell me what kind of performance increase I might expect with this software?

Hard to say since it depends on which minerd you are using.  Just test it and if you can, please post results.

Palmdetroit, thank you for your release! Has 2.5Mh on 6pc's with your miners.
Can donate you only by FZ, MOL, PRT or DUC.

what is the profitable cpu to mine? or better to ask profitable system to cpu mine?

Very fast..appreciate the update!

NP have another update in the works.

I gained about 40khash/s on an i7-960, about 200 on a 2x Xeon E5-1650

but my quark windows miner is something i hadn't updated in like 6+ months

Yup Quark, well isn't profitable anymore, but you can use it on other coins just as well.

What command line would you use to mine quark based coins to a wallet on another system?

for solomining you just set the IP and credentials to match with whatever client (set to server ) on your network. for details on whatever coin, just check their threads.

That would be super awesome.....

Could you please do that ?

What CPU got this (2494Kh/s) result? I have 4770K, but I get 805Kh/s only.

Dual opteron 6344(24 cores) comes in around there.

Can this CPU miner be used while I mine with my GPU using CGMiner?

yup just set t=n-1

where n is the number of your processros . So on quadcores


this will make sure your GPU miners run 100%

OK im sorry im kinda new on these -- can any one help me and post how ican use these in linux with quark !!! i tied to use the one in https://github.com/palmd/Cp3u put when i use -a quark it simply doesnt work these is the code i used
apt-get update
apt-get install -y make gcc m4 automake libevent-dev zlibc zlib1g-dev libjansson-dev libcurl4-openssl-dev git autoconf g++
cd /usr/local/
git clone https://github.com/pooler/cpuminer
cd cpuminer
./autogen.sh
./configure CFLAGS="-O3"
make

./minerd -a quark --url stratum+tcp://mine2.coinmine.pl:6020 -u Weblogin.Worker -p Worker password

can this miner be used on freebsd? if yes - how to compile it?

Updated bins with working pools for speed testing.

Added CryptoNote / Monero miner.

I have question does this miner can output data to a text file as well?
I hope to see start time and amount of shares (accepted or rejected!
So what the settings to add in code?

I am also trying mining qrk via GPU miner seen here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=632503.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=632503.0)

I understand it has latest binaries for windows. Somebut someone suggested me using the following settings for gpu miner:


it the last three setting that concern:
I know "I" mean intensity, "G" is number of thread and "W" amount of work or mhs or something!
Does thread number has something to do with my CPU or on GPU
If it has something to do with number of my cpu cores than using CPU while using sgminer isn't best!

Via GPU produced the following:
share (accepted): 594
share (rejected): 4
Hours: 20 of work

On CPU produced more as seen below:
shares: 674
rejected: 4
just over 17 hours work

If thread number seen in above has something to do with number of my cpu cores than using CPU while using sgminer isn't best! Based on my radeon v7 240 and on code above, what the best settings so I can earn more via my GPU?