Palmdetroit (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
PHS 50% PoS - Stop mining start minting
|
|
December 03, 2013, 05:45:15 AM |
|
False + ? Ad-Aware Trojan.Generic.9705038 20131203 Agnitum Riskware.BitCoinMiner!mabHpPndSNc 20131202 AhnLab-V3 20131202 AntiVir TR/BitCoinMiner.Gen 20131203 Antiy-AVL 20131129 Avast Win32:Crypt-OSW [Trj] 20131203 AVG 20131202 Baidu-International Trojan.Win32.Win64.aYo 20131202 BitDefender Trojan.Generic.9705038 20131203 Bkav 20131129 ByteHero 20131127 CAT-QuickHeal 20131202 ClamAV 20131203 Commtouch 20131203 Comodo UnclassifiedMalware 20131203 DrWeb 20131203 Emsisoft Trojan.Generic.9705038 (B) 20131203 ESET-NOD32 a variant of Win64/BitCoinMiner.E 20131202 F-Prot 20131203 F-Secure Trojan.Generic.9705038 20131203 Fortinet W64/BitCoinMiner.E 20131202 GData Trojan.Generic.9705038 20131203 Ikarus Win32.Crypt 20131203 Jiangmin 20131202 K7AntiVirus Trojan ( 004828c81 ) 20131202 K7GW Trojan ( 004828c81 ) 20131202 Kaspersky not-a-virus:RiskTool.Win64.BitCoinMiner.i 20131203 Kingsoft 20130829 Malwarebytes 20131203 McAfee RDN/Generic PUP.x!blp 20131203 McAfee-GW-Edition 20131202 Microsoft 20131203 MicroWorld-eScan Trojan.Generic.9705038 20131203 NANO-Antivirus 20131203 Norman Troj_Generic.QRECX 20131202 nProtect 20131202 Panda Trj/CI.A 20131202 Rising 20131203 Sophos 20131203 SUPERAntiSpyware 20131202 Symantec Bitcoinminer 20131203 TheHacker 20131202 TotalDefense 20131203 TrendMicro TROJ_GEN.R0CBC0OK913 20131203 TrendMicro-HouseCall TROJ_GEN.R0CBC0OIS13 20131203 VBA32 20131202 VIPRE Trojan.Win32.Generic!BT 20131203 ViRobot 20131202 I would not follow that link or repost the url
|
|
|
|
Palmdetroit (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
PHS 50% PoS - Stop mining start minting
|
|
December 03, 2013, 05:46:47 AM |
|
Does it not report the successful share?
It reports like this: [2013-11-30 23:10:22] accepted: 219/220 (99.55%), 713.56 khash/s (yay!!!) thank you, so its not working here, tried x64 and legacy, intel i5 2nd with p2ppool as you described Are you seeing [2013-11-30 23:35:25] Stratum detected new block [2013-11-30 23:35:43] Stratum detected new block [2013-11-30 23:35:56] Stratum detected new block Those should go by pretty quick if its working correctly. Try it with http://qrk.coinmine.pl/I put the batch in the files (may need to dl again) to mine with this pool now as it seems to have better latency. Also check your CPU usage.. should be running near 100% with default settings Im using minerd_w32_sse3.exe for my Q6600 and it shows the hashes and speed on every thead, i've created another worker for my laptop which is an i5-2410M 2.4Ghz to try to speed things up (just temporarily, while it's still somewhat minable, I dont wanto damage it). I was planning to leave it for the night and see if I wake up with results, but im only seeing "Stratum detected new block" all the time and nothing else. Is this normal? Why your version of minerd doesn't show speed and hashes? It would be better, it feels like you are doing something, since pool information on the websites is useless since it's always lagged. Btw, about false positives, just always download the stuff from a thrusted source, but most antivirus are throwing miners as trojans these days. Because I put the -q flag in the command line which means quiet, simply remove -q to see the hashes and madness. With -q you only see stratum and shares submitted.On laptops I would recommend using -t x , where x is cores-1 .. or have very good cooling!
|
|
|
|
giveBTCpls
|
|
December 03, 2013, 10:37:21 AM |
|
False + ? Ad-Aware Trojan.Generic.9705038 20131203 Agnitum Riskware.BitCoinMiner!mabHpPndSNc 20131202 AhnLab-V3 20131202 AntiVir TR/BitCoinMiner.Gen 20131203 Antiy-AVL 20131129 Avast Win32:Crypt-OSW [Trj] 20131203 AVG 20131202 Baidu-International Trojan.Win32.Win64.aYo 20131202 BitDefender Trojan.Generic.9705038 20131203 Bkav 20131129 ByteHero 20131127 CAT-QuickHeal 20131202 ClamAV 20131203 Commtouch 20131203 Comodo UnclassifiedMalware 20131203 DrWeb 20131203 Emsisoft Trojan.Generic.9705038 (B) 20131203 ESET-NOD32 a variant of Win64/BitCoinMiner.E 20131202 F-Prot 20131203 F-Secure Trojan.Generic.9705038 20131203 Fortinet W64/BitCoinMiner.E 20131202 GData Trojan.Generic.9705038 20131203 Ikarus Win32.Crypt 20131203 Jiangmin 20131202 K7AntiVirus Trojan ( 004828c81 ) 20131202 K7GW Trojan ( 004828c81 ) 20131202 Kaspersky not-a-virus:RiskTool.Win64.BitCoinMiner.i 20131203 Kingsoft 20130829 Malwarebytes 20131203 McAfee RDN/Generic PUP.x!blp 20131203 McAfee-GW-Edition 20131202 Microsoft 20131203 MicroWorld-eScan Trojan.Generic.9705038 20131203 NANO-Antivirus 20131203 Norman Troj_Generic.QRECX 20131202 nProtect 20131202 Panda Trj/CI.A 20131202 Rising 20131203 Sophos 20131203 SUPERAntiSpyware 20131202 Symantec Bitcoinminer 20131203 TheHacker 20131202 TotalDefense 20131203 TrendMicro TROJ_GEN.R0CBC0OK913 20131203 TrendMicro-HouseCall TROJ_GEN.R0CBC0OIS13 20131203 VBA32 20131202 VIPRE Trojan.Win32.Generic!BT 20131203 ViRobot 20131202 I would not follow that link or repost the urlIs this legit? http://www.share-online.biz/dl/L78K8NRMGUGI got it from there: The win executables took some time to compile, they are linkes in the announcement thread, and here: Win64: http://www.share-online.biz/download.php?id=E7OXBNRMUUWin32: http://www.share-online.biz/download.php?id=L78K8NRMGUGSince the quark-algo is pure plain c, i compiled it for different processor/instructionsets, just pick one that works best for you. AVX better than SSE and so on. Win64 will definatly gain heavy speed improvements: On my old core2 laptop, I had a win32_sse3 run with around 9-12 khash/s per core. With w64_sse4 i got around 22-26 khash/s per core. Is it faster? Github?
Yes definatly, one core on wallet: ~11kHash/s, w64_sse4 one core: ~23kHash/s So at least on my testing machine and win64: around 100% gain Github will come hopefully after the weekend, and hopefully coreectly setup as fork. See above:) It's waaaaayyyy faster:) The pool is for now only a standalone p2pool. The blocktimes in the stats page are hours off, but following the link into the block explorer shows the right times in UTC. I hope to have next week some time to create/setup a traditional pool. Yeah nice, taking it out of the loop, need to try out whats the speedgain in the cpuminer. I wonder if we get even more gain (since memory is not an issue) if we create for multiple times used hash functions in one hash run, distinct contexts, and then combine them in one big struct, so thats one big continous block of memory which can be copied with one single memcpy call, instead now 9 calls for smaller blocks.
|
|
|
|
Martijnvdc
|
|
December 03, 2013, 10:40:07 AM |
|
Any Linux version?
|
|
|
|
georgem
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1007
spreadcoin.info
|
|
December 07, 2013, 10:21:05 AM |
|
Thanks for this miner. Works great with coinmine.pl
I have successfully tested a vishera bulldozer, plus an older 4-core phenom X2
The older phenom needs the legacy.zip, or else it will crash.
Now both workers are visible in coinmine.pl but somehow coinmine.pl shows both workers with the same kilohash?
Strange. I get about 1.5 megahash with the bulldozer alone. But when I add the 4-core-phenom, coinmine shows the exact same value (of like 800 kilohash) for each worker.
But the miner on my 4-core-phenom shows an average of 3-400 kilohash (in the commandline), so I don't understand what happens here.
Maybe have to let it run for a day to see better average value at coinmine.pl.
|
|
|
|
georgem
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1007
spreadcoin.info
|
|
December 07, 2013, 10:24:34 AM |
|
hm, now my bulldozer is listed as inactive on coinmine.pl,... But the commandline in bulldozer is still running, and showing correct values.
Is there something I have to adjust when I run many computers in the same home network? Like different ports per computer or something?
|
|
|
|
jaycee1974
Member
Offline
Activity: 68
Merit: 10
|
|
December 07, 2013, 12:39:45 PM |
|
False + ? Ad-Aware Trojan.Generic.9705038 20131203 Agnitum Riskware.BitCoinMiner!mabHpPndSNc 20131202 AhnLab-V3 20131202 AntiVir TR/BitCoinMiner.Gen 20131203 Antiy-AVL 20131129 Avast Win32:Crypt-OSW [Trj] 20131203 AVG 20131202 Baidu-International Trojan.Win32.Win64.aYo 20131202 BitDefender Trojan.Generic.9705038 20131203 Bkav 20131129 ByteHero 20131127 CAT-QuickHeal 20131202 ClamAV 20131203 Commtouch 20131203 Comodo UnclassifiedMalware 20131203 DrWeb 20131203 Emsisoft Trojan.Generic.9705038 (B) 20131203 ESET-NOD32 a variant of Win64/BitCoinMiner.E 20131202 F-Prot 20131203 F-Secure Trojan.Generic.9705038 20131203 Fortinet W64/BitCoinMiner.E 20131202 GData Trojan.Generic.9705038 20131203 Ikarus Win32.Crypt 20131203 Jiangmin 20131202 K7AntiVirus Trojan ( 004828c81 ) 20131202 K7GW Trojan ( 004828c81 ) 20131202 Kaspersky not-a-virus:RiskTool.Win64.BitCoinMiner.i 20131203 Kingsoft 20130829 Malwarebytes 20131203 McAfee RDN/Generic PUP.x!blp 20131203 McAfee-GW-Edition 20131202 Microsoft 20131203 MicroWorld-eScan Trojan.Generic.9705038 20131203 NANO-Antivirus 20131203 Norman Troj_Generic.QRECX 20131202 nProtect 20131202 Panda Trj/CI.A 20131202 Rising 20131203 Sophos 20131203 SUPERAntiSpyware 20131202 Symantec Bitcoinminer 20131203 TheHacker 20131202 TotalDefense 20131203 TrendMicro TROJ_GEN.R0CBC0OK913 20131203 TrendMicro-HouseCall TROJ_GEN.R0CBC0OIS13 20131203 VBA32 20131202 VIPRE Trojan.Win32.Generic!BT 20131203 ViRobot 20131202 I would not follow that link or repost the urlLOL, every minerd.exe will give on many virusscanners results, even Urs, see here: SHA256: 80c3daa3bab0105ead192bfdbd423c120a06bda6f7fac1d7332f201dc59012f9 Dateiname: i7.zip Erkennungsrate: 9 / 48 Analyse-Datum: 2013-12-07 12:31:22 UTC ( vor 0 Minuten ) Avast Win32:Crypt-OSW [Trj] 20131207 Baidu-International Trojan.Win64.BitCoinMiner.E 20131207 ESET-NOD32 a variant of Win64/BitCoinMiner.E 20131207 Ikarus Win32.Crypt 20131207 K7AntiVirus Trojan ( 004828c81 ) 20131207 McAfee RDN/Generic.dx!c2i 20131207 Symantec Bitcoinminer 20131207 TrendMicro-HouseCall TROJ_GEN.F47V1130 20131207 VIPRE Trojan.Win32.Generic!BT 20131207 But thats the point : NOTICE: Results are not 100% accurate and can be reported as a false positive by some scannerswhen and if malware is found. Please judge these results for yourself. links: http://r.virscan.org/report/5832ee85219711b825f9208fd9ff5676.htmlhttps://www.virustotal.com/de/file/80c3daa3bab0105ead192bfdbd423c120a06bda6f7fac1d7332f201dc59012f9/analysis/1386419482/
|
|
|
|
JuanHungLo
|
|
December 07, 2013, 04:04:11 PM |
|
hm, now my bulldozer is listed as inactive on coinmine.pl,... But the commandline in bulldozer is still running, and showing correct values.
Is there something I have to adjust when I run many computers in the same home network? Like different ports per computer or something?
I came to the same conclusions you are. However, the truth is different. What I concluded after a week of observing is that your worker may not show as being "online" unless it just recently got a "block" accepted. As for the khash/rates being off or not assigned correctly, I totally agree and I am still puzzled by it. I would love for someone who is informed to comment, too.
|
Bull markets are born on pessimism, grow on skepticism, mature on optimism, and die on euphoria. - John Templeton
|
|
|
Palmdetroit (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
PHS 50% PoS - Stop mining start minting
|
|
December 08, 2013, 01:58:45 AM |
|
hm, now my bulldozer is listed as inactive on coinmine.pl,... But the commandline in bulldozer is still running, and showing correct values.
Is there something I have to adjust when I run many computers in the same home network? Like different ports per computer or something?
I came to the same conclusions you are. However, the truth is different. What I concluded after a week of observing is that your worker may not show as being "online" unless it just recently got a "block" accepted. As for the khash/rates being off or not assigned correctly, I totally agree and I am still puzzled by it. I would love for someone who is informed to comment, too. The difficulty requirement is quite high now, I assume the pool raised it to lower demand on it's servers, since they were having problems earlier this week. This causes higher variance where you will show offline (if you haven't gotten share recently) or a very high mining rate, or low depending on how many shares you have submitted in the time frame the pool uses to calculate active hashrate, so this is normal You don't need separate ports but you can try all using one worker (to 'smooth out' variance) Pool is down for maint. now it seems so not sure if you can change the time window or not.
|
|
|
|
Palmdetroit (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
PHS 50% PoS - Stop mining start minting
|
|
December 08, 2013, 02:02:04 AM |
|
Thanks for this miner. Works great with coinmine.pl
I have successfully tested a vishera bulldozer, plus an older 4-core phenom X2
The older phenom needs the legacy.zip, or else it will crash.
Now both workers are visible in coinmine.pl but somehow coinmine.pl shows both workers with the same kilohash?
Strange. I get about 1.5 megahash with the bulldozer alone. But when I add the 4-core-phenom, coinmine shows the exact same value (of like 800 kilohash) for each worker.
But the miner on my 4-core-phenom shows an average of 3-400 kilohash (in the commandline), so I don't understand what happens here.
Maybe have to let it run for a day to see better average value at coinmine.pl.
The rate shown in the miner is more accurate than the pool. What hardware/cpu/settings are getting 1.5mh ?
|
|
|
|
Palmdetroit (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
PHS 50% PoS - Stop mining start minting
|
|
December 08, 2013, 02:57:40 AM Last edit: December 08, 2013, 03:14:51 AM by Palmdetroit |
|
Bulldozer Improved added. i3i5i7 Improved added. Should add 10%+ speed .
https://sourceforge.net/projects/philosopherstone/files/QRK/
Could use some feedback for improvements over previous miner (speed increases).
|
|
|
|
JuanHungLo
|
|
December 08, 2013, 04:03:04 AM |
|
I appreciate the updates but my machines are so old they are all using the legacy miner. Any updates for that one?
|
Bull markets are born on pessimism, grow on skepticism, mature on optimism, and die on euphoria. - John Templeton
|
|
|
Palmdetroit (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
PHS 50% PoS - Stop mining start minting
|
|
December 08, 2013, 04:04:46 AM Last edit: December 08, 2013, 04:16:31 AM by Palmdetroit |
|
I appreciate the updates but my machines are so old they are all using the legacy miner. Any updates for that one?
Any luck with win64all_improved? Here is experimental version, but I have no idea if it will show any improvements, let me know and will delete if not https://sourceforge.net/projects/philosopherstone/files/QRK/
|
|
|
|
JuanHungLo
|
|
December 08, 2013, 04:21:18 AM |
|
No, I just tried the 64 improved, it starts, then quickly crashes on my fastest processor the Phenom II X4 940 BE.
I'll try the experimental version.
|
Bull markets are born on pessimism, grow on skepticism, mature on optimism, and die on euphoria. - John Templeton
|
|
|
JuanHungLo
|
|
December 08, 2013, 04:29:22 AM |
|
Ok, the experimental legacy version runs at 109.75 khash/sec per processor.
The original runs at 120.76 khash/sec per processor on the Phenom II X4 940 BE.
|
Bull markets are born on pessimism, grow on skepticism, mature on optimism, and die on euphoria. - John Templeton
|
|
|
Palmdetroit (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
PHS 50% PoS - Stop mining start minting
|
|
December 08, 2013, 04:39:36 AM |
|
Ok, the experimental legacy version runs at 109.75 khash/sec per processor.
The original runs at 120.76 khash/sec per processor on the Phenom II X4 940 BE.
try the AMD legacy one and post results =
|
|
|
|
JuanHungLo
|
|
December 08, 2013, 04:59:02 AM |
|
Ok, the experimental legacy version runs at 109.75 khash/sec per processor.
The original runs at 120.76 khash/sec per processor on the Phenom II X4 940 BE.
try the AMD legacy one and post results = 111.52 khash/sec per processor
|
Bull markets are born on pessimism, grow on skepticism, mature on optimism, and die on euphoria. - John Templeton
|
|
|
Atomar
|
|
December 08, 2013, 05:27:11 AM |
|
I have a question: I have a Intel Core i7 2600 3.4 GHz CPU. Which mine would be the "best"
|
|
|
|
Palmdetroit (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
PHS 50% PoS - Stop mining start minting
|
|
December 08, 2013, 06:04:27 AM |
|
Ok, the experimental legacy version runs at 109.75 khash/sec per processor.
The original runs at 120.76 khash/sec per processor on the Phenom II X4 940 BE.
try the AMD legacy one and post results = 111.52 khash/sec per processor Use the best one I'll delete the experimental
|
|
|
|
Palmdetroit (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
PHS 50% PoS - Stop mining start minting
|
|
December 08, 2013, 06:06:29 AM |
|
I have a question: I have a Intel Core i7 2600 3.4 GHz CPU. Which mine would be the "best" Test out i3i5i7_improved and old i7 one , see which reports higher.
|
|
|
|
|