Bitcoin Forum

Other => Archival => Topic started by: CoinHumper on December 16, 2013, 04:55:06 PM



Title: delete
Post by: CoinHumper on December 16, 2013, 04:55:06 PM
delete


Title: Re: delete
Post by: Hazard on December 16, 2013, 04:56:15 PM
Go die in a hole. No one here likes you.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: ixxi on December 16, 2013, 05:00:08 PM
Will I win?

No you will lose. On every possible level.
And the whole cryptocommunity loses along with you.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: T.Stuart on December 16, 2013, 05:02:42 PM
If you can be bothered to do all of this why not just go and meet them face-to-face and sort it out like that? Much easier.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: btcrich on December 16, 2013, 05:13:35 PM

It's fair to assume that 90% of them are small traders averaging less than 1 BTC at any given time. Then there is the rest with more and the top 3%-4% with significant amounts trading at any given time. As a trader you can't make very much money with small trades and I was one of the people with significant amounts at any given time. The bottom 90% alone were probably worth 1500 to 2000 BTC and the top 10% worth several times that. BitJohn has also indicated that about 100 BTC/ month was your revenue stream from fees. It's easy to see there is a magnitude of order more on deposit than brought in by fees.


Lmao.  It's only 63 BTC you idiot. 

I'm sure you wouldn't be complaining if BTC was climbing to 2k at the moment when you might have sold them at their low.

Sounds like you should not be anywhere near crypto currencies at the moment.  You might want to wait until the only way to buy goods is by using Bitcoins before considering owning any.  You're not built for it.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: cryptohunter on December 16, 2013, 05:16:26 PM

It's fair to assume that 90% of them are small traders averaging less than 1 BTC at any given time. Then there is the rest with more and the top 3%-4% with significant amounts trading at any given time. As a trader you can't make very much money with small trades and I was one of the people with significant amounts at any given time. The bottom 90% alone were probably worth 1500 to 2000 BTC and the top 10% worth several times that. BitJohn has also indicated that about 100 BTC/ month was your revenue stream from fees. It's easy to see there is a magnitude of order more on deposit than brought in by fees.


Lmao.  It's only 63 BTC you idiot.  

I'm sure you wouldn't be complaining if BTC was climbing to 2k at the moment when you might have sold them at their low.

Sounds like you should not be anywhere near crypto currencies at the moment.  You might want to wait until the only way to buy goods is by using Bitcoins before considering owning any.  You're not built for it.


Yeah i think he is taking it too far. However this place is starting to piss a lot of people off.

Today there is a new issue, try to withdraw anything and sends you the email confirm, click that and cryptsy says

An Error Has Occurred, Please Log Into Your Account First


WTF is this new shit, their site is full of bugs, really needs to get btce to recommend a good coder.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: tokyoghetto on December 16, 2013, 05:16:40 PM
ITT: People pretend to be BTC Ballers and act like 63 BTC is chump change.

lol.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: hybridsole on December 16, 2013, 05:16:53 PM
I hope you get permabanned from Cryptsy and every other reputable exchange.  


Title: Re: delete
Post by: Bobsurplus on December 16, 2013, 05:20:09 PM
OP, you're a loooooooooser!

Give they guy a break, his site is not easy to maintain nor it it easy to put up with us cryptocoiners.

my advise to you is:

SHUT THE FUCK UP, you have a choice to use his site, you can choose not to as well. NOBODY is forcing you to use cryptsy.



Title: Re: delete
Post by: Lala on December 16, 2013, 05:23:43 PM
Your BTC will hit $1.2k so please shut up.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: btcrich on December 16, 2013, 05:24:37 PM
ITT: People pretend to be BTC Ballers and act like 63 BTC is chump change.

lol.

OP is claiming to be a part of the elite with his measly 63 BTC.  That's funny.

I wasn't hinting at all about how many I own.  I think anyone that has been holding coins for 2+ years will find this chump change though.

Your BTC will hit $1.2k so please shut up.

No, it will never ever ever go up again.  Only down!  ;)

To be honest, Cryptsy has probably done him a huge favor and he's too shortsighted to realize it.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: Bobsurplus on December 16, 2013, 05:25:27 PM
ITT: People pretend to be BTC Ballers and act like 63 BTC is chump change.

lol.

OP is claiming to be a part of the elite with his measly 63 BTC.  That's funny.

I wasn't hinting at all about how many I own.  I think anyone that has been holding coins for 2+ years will find this chump change though.

I've been holding since oct 2012, I bought in at 14- all the way up too 100!


Title: Re: delete
Post by: btcrich on December 16, 2013, 05:32:27 PM
ITT: People pretend to be BTC Ballers and act like 63 BTC is chump change.

lol.

OP is claiming to be a part of the elite with his measly 63 BTC.  That's funny.

I wasn't hinting at all about how many I own.  I think anyone that has been holding coins for 2+ years will find this chump change though.

I've been holding since oct 2012, I bought in at 14- all the way up too 100!


Your portfolio has probably dropped more than $75,000 just today and I bet you'll sleep like a baby.

I have no idea why idiots like the OP even get into crypto currencies.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: Bobsurplus on December 16, 2013, 05:39:27 PM
ITT: People pretend to be BTC Ballers and act like 63 BTC is chump change.

lol.

OP is claiming to be a part of the elite with his measly 63 BTC.  That's funny.

I wasn't hinting at all about how many I own.  I think anyone that has been holding coins for 2+ years will find this chump change though.

I've been holding since oct 2012, I bought in at 14- all the way up too 100!


Your portfolio has probably dropped more than $75,000 just today and I bet you'll sleep like a baby.

I have no idea why idiots like the OP even get into crypto currencies.

I've sold all the coins I'm willing to sell under 10K.

I have amassed a real fortune and for that I thank god. I will hold my last 600 or so coins until their over 10k each or worth nothing, either way the last 14 months have been out of this world for me!

This OP is just sad, sad because he has no real wealth but had the opportunity to and missed out.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: coinerer on December 16, 2013, 05:40:02 PM
Few days ago I wrote on Quark topic:



and we back to 4th. my coffee really nice.  ;D
Wait 5 hours, until Americans wake up and dump.
I'd recommend u to sell fast


Sooner and more they sell, sooner you will buy much more :)



I already bought over 100btc worth, but of prices are going down, then i'm in for another 100 btc worth.  8)


What will you do if it happens Bitcoin fall of 50% for example?





Maybe Cryptsy owners read me :)


Btw, trend is up generally.



Title: Re: delete
Post by: hypostatization on December 16, 2013, 05:41:22 PM
I wish this did not happen. In the above text, you have made bold claims about what has occurred behind the scenes at Cryptsy---without providing supporting evidence. I do believe fraud or gross negligence are clear, but there is no concrete evidence (yet) that Cryptsy borrowed from deposits.

All of that being said: Cryptsy is the clear problem here and the source of this issue. Its initial operational failures may be understandable, but all failures past that point belong to Cryptsy. They span a wide range. Cryptsy has unabashedly driven all fallout in this situation, and jeopardized the alt market at large. They have had ample opportunity to respond, correct the situation, and even turn this into a major PR win.

Instead, the message is clear: last week's 148.55 BTC revenue is more important than the financial welfare of its users and broader stability of the alt market. Not only did Cryptsy choose not to suspend trading and deposits---in order to correct known and escalating issues---they also chose to divert resources to opening additional markets. Every moment counts during a crisis like this. BigVern made it count toward his ability to collect fees.

Further, what scant information we have received from Cryptsy has encouraged usage, despite no clear ability to resolve fundamental issues affecting countless users. Incompetence or worse.

Cryptsy chose to operate as a legally registered entity, to identify its owner, leading to countless assurances throughout the community that this somehow makes Cryptsy more trustworthy. Ultimately, they offered users and investors assurance by clearly identifying themselves as subject to the law.

If cryptocurrencies will succeed at large---then that will mean confronting the law, and all of the pain that process entails. Entities like Cryptsy make that inevitable.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: peterlustig on December 16, 2013, 05:42:50 PM
bullshit :P
So you tried to get out your hundreds of btc and cryptsy could not deliver? Evidence or gtfo plz.

@ hypostatization: What's really destabilizing the markets are people like you spreading panic, making elephants out of mosquitos. Cryptsy is great and will become perfect.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: btcrich on December 16, 2013, 05:48:06 PM
How about reading terms before using any service?

Without prejudice to any other terms of this Agreement, relating to the limitation of liability and provision of indemnities, the following clauses shall apply to our Electronic Services.

    j. System errors

We shall have no liability to you for damage which you may suffer as a result of transmission errors, technical faults, malfunctions, illegal intervention in network equipment, network overloads, malicious blocking of access by third parties, internet malfunctions, interruptions or other deficiencies on the part of internet service providers. You acknowledge that access to Electronic Services may be limited or unavailable due to such system errors, and that we reserve the right upon notice to suspend access to Electronic Services for this reason.

    k. Delays

Neither we nor any third party software provider accepts any liability in respect of any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions in any data provided to you in connection with an Electronic Service.
We do not accept any liability in respect of any delays, inaccuracies or errors in prices quoted to you if these delays, inaccuracies or errors are caused by third party service providers with which we may collaborate.
We shall not be obliged to execute any instruction which has been identified that is based on errors caused by delays of the system to update prices provided by the system price feeder or the third party service providers. We do not accept any liability towards executed trades that have been based and have been the result of delays as described above.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: indiemax on December 16, 2013, 06:55:18 PM
OP really ought to move home if he manages to get SEC to shut Cryptsy

lots of pissed off peeps

thin ice indeed


Title: Re: delete
Post by: damnation on December 16, 2013, 07:11:44 PM
it seems a little silly that...op took the anonymous out of bitcoin trade.. whats the taxes due on 63 BTC? and other previous undeclared earnings..

Seems funny to walk into a place... and show them a whole bunch of your undeclared earnings... your trade history.. etc.. anyone with a comp can sign into/onto cryptsy and anyone calculate 1 BTC = $1000, but showing them your trade history... makes the whole thing silly.

I'd be excited to if i was with the IRS and it wouldnt be for finding out about cryptsy.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: stas on December 16, 2013, 07:17:10 PM
OP, you're a loooooooooser!

Give they guy a break, his site is not easy to maintain nor it it easy to put up with us cryptocoiners.

my advise to you is:

SHUT THE FUCK UP, you have a choice to use his site, you can choose not to as well. NOBODY is forcing you to use cryptsy.



+1


Title: Re: delete
Post by: btcrich on December 16, 2013, 07:36:26 PM
I'd be excited to if i was with the IRS and it wouldnt be for finding out about cryptsy.

Here comes the audit for OP.  ;D


Title: Re: delete
Post by: A L I E N on December 16, 2013, 07:47:50 PM
Some were saying that Paul Vernon aka BigVern doesn't visit the forums. I know for a fact that BigVern does indeed look at these boards as I received a PM in response to my thread Cryptsy - Complaint Filed with the Florida Attorney General located here - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=361514.

The answer is no, there is nothing you can do to make this right and that's not how this works anyway. The damage and losses you caused by "borrowing the deposits" is done. You must really think people are stupid and can't clearly see what you have done. Before the new update BitJohn had said numerous times that Cryptsy had somewhere just over 10,000 users. Sounds about right.

It's fair to assume that 90% of them are small traders averaging less than 1 BTC at any given time. Then there is the rest with more and the top 3%-4% with significant amounts trading at any given time. As a trader you can't make very much money with small trades and I was one of the people with significant amounts at any given time. The bottom 90% alone were probably worth 1500 to 2000 BTC and the top 10% worth several times that. BitJohn has also indicated that about 100 BTC/ month was your revenue stream from fees. It's easy to see there is a magnitude of order more on deposit than brought in by fees.

What Cryptsy did was borrow from the customers deposits before the peak of $1200 per BTC and got caught off guard by a rapidly rising market with everybody wanting their BTC NOW and you didn't have them to give.

I do believe you intended to roll out the new update but not as soon as you did. The new roll out and it's subsequent comedy of "errors" were nothing more than a cover while you scrambled to find the funds to put out the fires. I also believe in your panic you further borrowed at the peak, sold high and are now buying back at a 30% discount and returning deposits slowly. That explains why about 45 BTC worth of my coins have been deposited manually into my accounts over the course of the past week.

At the peak, my 63 BTC was worth about $75,000. Today as you are returning it slowly it is worth about $50,000 and falling. You have cost me at least $25,000 by tying up my funds in this botched borrow. That's just me and I can assure people the cumulative damage runs well into the millions.

Now here's the part you need to pay attention to. Early on all I asked for was some detailed explanation from you on exactly what is going on. Nothing more and you remained silent and now are aware that I did indeed file a complaint with the Florida AG. A 140 character cryptic message on Twitter doesn't cut it.

Maybe I am wrong. Maybe just because it walks like a duck, talks like duck and has the DNA of a duck, it really isn't a duck. If I were you, I would break my oath of silence, come here and explain exactly what happened. You might also consider making my deposits right according to the BTC peak as you know exactly who I am.

If you choose to further ignore the call for an explanation from you, as you did earlier which resulted in the aforementioned complaint, I will start organizing Cryptsy customers into a class and will file a complaint with the FTC. I will also on their behalf come after Cryptsy and Cryptsy's investors for the damages caused by at best, incompetence and more than likely nefarious. Will I win? Who knows. But I do know that getting complaints to the AG and the FTC as well getting your investors sued is a fast track to nowhere really fast. I suggest you create a user modded thread and start explaining.




What Cryptsy did was borrow from the customers deposits before the peak of $1200 per BTC and got caught off guard by a rapidly rising market with everybody wanting their BTC NOW and you didn't have them to give.



Defamation

Any intentional false communication, either written or spoken, that harms a person's reputation; decreases the respect, regard, or confidence in which a person is held; or induces disparaging, hostile, or disagreeable opinions or feelings against a person.

Defamation may be a criminal or civil charge. It encompasses both written statements, known as libel, and spoken statements, called slander.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: Doublelucky on December 16, 2013, 07:52:29 PM
Wanted to liquidate all my shit before Monday morning hit..

Cryptsy still holding onto my pending withdraw from 3 days ago and won't let me withdraw anything else

Can't even move my shit to BTC-e for USD

This is probably the 5th time cryptsy has cost me again.. Like literally cost me
Da fuck!!!!!!!


Title: Re: delete
Post by: PrintMule on December 16, 2013, 07:59:50 PM
By the way. OP is somewhat right in his proceedings. It's just so many people are sucking on cryptsy's big wrinkly tit, they would hate to see it go, even if they are being ripped off, does not matter.

The amount of rage/butthurt in this thread = overwhelming. It would be so satisfying to see them cry when this exchanges goes down.

I personally do not want it to go down. I've done some profits there, and despite the awful waiting time on deposits and horrible trade lag, it was a worthwhile experience. I had a feeling that exchange operators are screwing with me, but it does not matter. As long as you distribute your wealth over multiple exchanges/wallets/services = you are safe.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: jerrybusey on December 16, 2013, 08:31:38 PM
Some people want wild west profits with FDIC bank risk.

Cryptsy has been known to have problems for a long time but some people who apparently can't tolerate the risk of something going wrong with their Crytpsy account at an inconvenient time still can't resist the urge to trade and keep funds there. I'm guessing that's because Cryptsy generally has better prices, tighter spreads, and more volume on most alts than other exchanges do. Assume Crypsty (and every other crypto service) is going to break when you need it most (peak volume times particularly) if you want to be safe. But you don't want to be safe; you want to be rich.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: Doublelucky on December 16, 2013, 09:32:04 PM
Some people want wild west profits with FDIC bank risk.

Cryptsy has been known to have problems for a long time but some people who apparently can't tolerate the risk of something going wrong with their Crytpsy account at an inconvenient time still can't resist the urge to trade and keep funds there. I'm guessing that's because Cryptsy generally has better prices, tighter spreads, and more volume on most alts than other exchanges do. Assume Crypsty (and every other crypto service) is going to break when you need it most (peak volume times particularly) if you want to be safe. But you don't want to be safe; you want to be rich.



No.

Cryptsy isn't AN option... it is the ONLY option.

And the volatility of the market means that all time/every time (every second) is when you "need it the most"

Cryptsy doesn't just 'break' during peak volume times, it always fucks up

 


Title: Re: delete
Post by: CristianoSantos on December 16, 2013, 10:04:06 PM
Some were saying that Paul Vernon aka BigVern doesn't visit the forums. I know for a fact that BigVern does indeed look at these boards as I received a PM in response to my thread Cryptsy - Complaint Filed with the Florida Attorney General located here - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=361514.

The answer is no, there is nothing you can do to make this right and that's not how this works anyway. The damage and losses you caused by "borrowing the deposits" is done. You must really think people are stupid and can't clearly see what you have done. Before the new update BitJohn had said numerous times that Cryptsy had somewhere just over 10,000 users. Sounds about right.

It's fair to assume that 90% of them are small traders averaging less than 1 BTC at any given time. Then there is the rest with more and the top 3%-4% with significant amounts trading at any given time. As a trader you can't make very much money with small trades and I was one of the people with significant amounts at any given time. The bottom 90% alone were probably worth 1500 to 2000 BTC and the top 10% worth several times that. BitJohn has also indicated that about 100 BTC/ month was your revenue stream from fees. It's easy to see there is a magnitude of order more on deposit than brought in by fees.

What Cryptsy did was borrow from the customers deposits before the peak of $1200 per BTC and got caught off guard by a rapidly rising market with everybody wanting their BTC NOW and you didn't have them to give.

I do believe you intended to roll out the new update but not as soon as you did. The new roll out and it's subsequent comedy of "errors" were nothing more than a cover while you scrambled to find the funds to put out the fires. I also believe in your panic you further borrowed at the peak, sold high and are now buying back at a 30% discount and returning deposits slowly. That explains why about 45 BTC worth of my coins have been deposited manually into my accounts over the course of the past week.

At the peak, my 63 BTC was worth about $75,000. Today as you are returning it slowly it is worth about $50,000 and falling. You have cost me at least $25,000 by tying up my funds in this botched borrow. That's just me and I can assure people the cumulative damage runs well into the millions.

Now here's the part you need to pay attention to. Early on all I asked for was some detailed explanation from you on exactly what is going on. Nothing more and you remained silent and now are aware that I did indeed file a complaint with the Florida AG. A 140 character cryptic message on Twitter doesn't cut it.

Maybe I am wrong. Maybe just because it walks like a duck, talks like duck and has the DNA of a duck, it really isn't a duck. If I were you, I would break my oath of silence, come here and explain exactly what happened. You might also consider making my deposits right according to the BTC peak as you know exactly who I am.

If you choose to further ignore the call for an explanation from you, as you did earlier which resulted in the aforementioned complaint, I will start organizing Cryptsy customers into a class and will file a complaint with the FTC. I will also on their behalf come after Cryptsy and Cryptsy's investors for the damages caused by at best, incompetence and more than likely nefarious. Will I win? Who knows. But I do know that getting complaints to the AG and the FTC as well getting your investors sued is a fast track to nowhere really fast. I suggest you create a user modded thread and start explaining.


Big Vern is doing a great job with Ccriptsy. I am confident that he will fix the situation.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: e521 on December 16, 2013, 10:10:41 PM
OP seriously you are such a loser, who cares about your fucking 63 BTC?
I had my coins back creating a simple ticket and waiting 10 hours, as everybody else.
Exchange engine is still shit and deposit are late but hey I use it because I want to.
Please cash out as soon as possible and disappear


Title: Re: delete
Post by: jerrybusey on December 16, 2013, 10:51:43 PM
Some people want wild west profits with FDIC bank risk.

Cryptsy has been known to have problems for a long time but some people who apparently can't tolerate the risk of something going wrong with their Crytpsy account at an inconvenient time still can't resist the urge to trade and keep funds there. I'm guessing that's because Cryptsy generally has better prices, tighter spreads, and more volume on most alts than other exchanges do. Assume Crypsty (and every other crypto service) is going to break when you need it most (peak volume times particularly) if you want to be safe. But you don't want to be safe; you want to be rich.



No.

Cryptsy isn't AN option... it is the ONLY option.

And the volatility of the market means that all time/every time (every second) is when you "need it the most"

Cryptsy doesn't just 'break' during peak volume times, it always fucks up

 

Cryptsy isn't a utility or even a bank. It's a mom and pop startup operating on the fringe (lesser alt coins) of a fringe (Bitcoin) market. Nobody goes there except to try to make money off the most speculative alt coins (which include everything beyond litecoin really). Their unreliability pisses me off but that's the price of playing in lesser alt coins. No other alt exchange could just step in and pick up the slack if Cryptsy disappeared without even worse problems. Look at what has been happening with coinex for example. If you want reliability above all else then stick to BTC and LTC exclusively since there are larger and more reliable exchanges that deal in those, or better yet stick to established investment vehicles. This is still the wild west with all the positives and negatives that entails.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: crazywack on December 16, 2013, 11:04:31 PM
I see audits for all you Florida folks coming soon!!! thanks OP, didn't have to fuck over every current and future cryptsy user.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: MessyCoin on December 16, 2013, 11:27:08 PM
Bitcoin and all alts are still experimental as stated in the software! And from what I have seen, Cryptsy have responded with due diligence to the recent problems. We agree to their terms of service before using them. Feels like the OP may have acted unfairly by escalating their complaint so quickly.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: wtman on December 16, 2013, 11:31:23 PM
yawn


Title: Re: delete
Post by: sixteendigits on December 16, 2013, 11:59:10 PM
Now I haven't always been the biggest Cryptsy fan, the bugs and glitches at times were enough to make my blood boil.  When you stop and think about it though, anyone heavily involved in the alt-scene should be on their knees thanking Big Vern.  The alt-scene simply would not be what it is today without Cryptsy (for better or for worse).

The only people who have room to complain about "Cryptsy costing them money" are newbies who just jumped into the scene with this recent rise.  If you are a GPU miner and/or got into the alt-scene last spring, Cryptsy almost certainly made you WAY more coin than it ever cost you.

I owe Cryptsy for allowing me to vastly improve my financial situation and life over the past 6 months with just 7 7950s.  I am forever grateful for Cryptsy.

So thanks for ruining it for the rest of us OP just because you are pissy about 63 BTC that'll eventually go right back up in value again anyway.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: PrintMule on December 17, 2013, 12:32:45 AM
Now I haven't always been the biggest Cryptsy fan, the bugs and glitches at times were enough to make my blood boil.  When you stop and think about it though, anyone heavily involved in the alt-scene should be on their knees thanking Big Vern.  The alt-scene simply would not be what it is today without Cryptsy (for better or for worse).

The only people who have room to complain about "Cryptsy costing them money" are newbies who just jumped into the scene with this recent rise.  If you are a GPU miner and/or got into the alt-scene last spring, Cryptsy almost certainly made you WAY more coin than it ever cost you.

I owe Cryptsy for allowing me to vastly improve my financial situation and life over the past 6 months with just 7 7950s.  I am forever grateful for Cryptsy.

So thanks for ruining it for the rest of us OP just because you are pissy about 63 BTC that'll eventually go right back up in value again anyway.

Don't worry. It's most likely a desperate FUD thread, nothing more. Although I kinda root for OP here :) He cannot ruin it so simply by himself. Also how do you capital gains from altcoins? It's ridiculous.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: alyssa85 on December 17, 2013, 02:23:00 AM
I'm puzzled here. Cryptsy doesn't trade back and forth into fiat.

It just trades alts, which are all imaginary tokens under the law, like Second Life money and Star Wars Galaxy money. It's not regulated by anyone, it's just "tokens" being bartered back and forth. No dollars are ever quoted on the trades, all trades are just in BTC, LTC and XPM.

Therefore don't see how you can legally claim that you "lost $75,000" when you can't trade BTC for dollars on Cryptsy nor on any exchange regulated by the American govt. You mentioned in the other thread that the Florida regulators "eyes popped at the amount of dollars being traded" - but you were misleading them, weren't you, because no dollars are traded on Cryptsy at all.

You are not covered by any regulation involving finance, because imaginary tokens including cryptos are not recognised as money. You may perhaps be covered by regulation involving sale of goods. But those types of regs simply rap a provider on the knuckles if their customer service is poor or delayed - usually you have to prove their service delay is extraordinarily bad - that you waited months for your goods, and gave them plenty of time to rectify their problem and it still didn't happen. Going to the regulator for sale of goods errors is supposed to be the last resort when you have exhausted all avenues yourself.

As for Cryptsy - their problems all started when they moved from their old trading platform to the new one. The new one had bugs and a lag and it was unfortunate coincidence that they launched it just when loads of new people were trying to join. but I expect they'll sort it.

I personally prefer vircurex - but they are no good for those trading the smaller alts, they only deal with the older established alts.

P.S. People getting involved in cryptos need to stop referencing everything in terms of dollars. It's not about dollars. You haven't lost any dollars. At most you've lost BTC which is a fun imaginary currency, and in any case, you got your fun crypto tokens back didn't you?


Title: Re: delete
Post by: hypostatization on December 17, 2013, 02:34:47 AM
It just trades alts, which are all imaginary tokens under the law, like Second Life money and Star Wars Galaxy money. It's not regulated by anyone, it's just "tokens" being bartered back and forth.

I am not sure that is accurate: http://www.fincen.gov/statutes_regs/guidance/html/FIN-2013-G001.html (http://www.fincen.gov/statutes_regs/guidance/html/FIN-2013-G001.html)

The definition of a money transmitter does not differentiate between real currencies and convertible virtual currencies. Accepting and transmitting anything of value that substitutes for currency makes a person a money transmitter under the regulations implementing the BSA.12 FinCEN has reviewed different activities involving virtual currency and has made determinations regarding the appropriate regulatory treatment of administrators and exchangers under three scenarios: brokers and dealers of e-currencies and e-precious metals; centralized convertible virtual currencies; and de-centralized convertible virtual currencies.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: Kryptox on December 17, 2013, 02:36:50 AM
I'm puzzled here. Cryptsy doesn't trade back and forth into fiat.

It just trades alts, which are all imaginary tokens under the law, like Second Life money and Star Wars Galaxy money. It's not regulated by anyone, it's just "tokens" being bartered back and forth. No dollars are ever quoted on the trades, all trades are just in BTC, LTC and XPM.

Therefore don't see how you can legally claim that you "lost $75,000" when you can't trade BTC for dollars on Cryptsy nor on any exchange regulated by the American govt. You mentioned in the other thread that the Florida regulators "eyes popped at the amount of dollars being traded" - but you were misleading them, weren't you, because no dollars are traded on Cryptsy at all.

You are not covered by any regulation involving finance, because imaginary tokens including cryptos are not recognised as money. You may perhaps be covered by regulation involving sale of goods. But those types of regs simply rap a provider on the knuckles if their customer service is poor or delayed - usually you have to prove their service delay is extraordinarily bad - that you waited months for your goods, and gave them plenty of time to rectify their problem and it still didn't happen. Going to the regulator for sale of goods errors is supposed to be the last resort when you have exhausted all avenues yourself.

As for Cryptsy - their problems all started when they moved from their old trading platform to the new one. The new one had bugs and a lag and it was unfortunate coincidence that they launched it just when loads of new people were trying to join. but I expect they'll sort it.

I personally prefer vircurex - but they are no good for those trading the smaller alts, they only deal with the older established alts.

P.S. People getting involved in cryptos need to stop referencing everything in terms of dollars. It's not about dollars. You haven't lost any dollars. At most you've lost BTC which is a fun imaginary currency, and in any case, you got your fun crypto tokens back didn't you?

Very well said.  +1


Title: Re: delete
Post by: alyssa85 on December 17, 2013, 02:37:14 AM
It just trades alts, which are all imaginary tokens under the law, like Second Life money and Star Wars Galaxy money. It's not regulated by anyone, it's just "tokens" being bartered back and forth.

I am not sure that is accurate: http://www.fincen.gov/statutes_regs/guidance/html/FIN-2013-G001.html (http://www.fincen.gov/statutes_regs/guidance/html/FIN-2013-G001.html)

The definition of a money transmitter does not differentiate between real currencies and convertible virtual currencies. Accepting and transmitting anything of value that substitutes for currency makes a person a money transmitter under the regulations implementing the BSA.12 FinCEN has reviewed different activities involving virtual currency and has made determinations regarding the appropriate regulatory treatment of administrators and exchangers under three scenarios: brokers and dealers of e-currencies and e-precious metals; centralized convertible virtual currencies; and de-centralized convertible virtual currencies.

None of the cryptos are convertible to fiat in the USA though, are they. Therefore they are not convertible currencies. Cryptsy has never quoted any dollars in any of their trades - they weren't treating them as convertible to fiat at all. You were simply barterring one alt for another. You'd have a devil of a job proving XPM, sexcoin and others are convertible.

With e-gold and others, they were actually offering to convert to dollars, which made egold a convertible virtual currency and which is why they took them down. If they were converting their egold to second life tokens, there wouldn't have been a problem.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: hypostatization on December 17, 2013, 02:39:50 AM
It just trades alts, which are all imaginary tokens under the law, like Second Life money and Star Wars Galaxy money. It's not regulated by anyone, it's just "tokens" being bartered back and forth.

I am not sure that is accurate: http://www.fincen.gov/statutes_regs/guidance/html/FIN-2013-G001.html (http://www.fincen.gov/statutes_regs/guidance/html/FIN-2013-G001.html)

The definition of a money transmitter does not differentiate between real currencies and convertible virtual currencies. Accepting and transmitting anything of value that substitutes for currency makes a person a money transmitter under the regulations implementing the BSA.12 FinCEN has reviewed different activities involving virtual currency and has made determinations regarding the appropriate regulatory treatment of administrators and exchangers under three scenarios: brokers and dealers of e-currencies and e-precious metals; centralized convertible virtual currencies; and de-centralized convertible virtual currencies.

None of the cryptos are convertible to fiat in the USA though, are they. Therefore they are not convertible currencies. Cryptsy has never quoted any dollars in any of their trades - they weren't treating them as convertible to fiat at all. You were simply barterring one alt for another. You'd have a devil of a job proving XPM, sexcoin and others are convertible.

From Cryptsy's own TOS:

12. BSA / FinCEN

Cryptsy is registered with the BSA as an MSB (Money Services Business). Cryptsy may be required to file details of account activity to this organization from time to time.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: alyssa85 on December 17, 2013, 02:42:58 AM
It just trades alts, which are all imaginary tokens under the law, like Second Life money and Star Wars Galaxy money. It's not regulated by anyone, it's just "tokens" being bartered back and forth.

I am not sure that is accurate: http://www.fincen.gov/statutes_regs/guidance/html/FIN-2013-G001.html (http://www.fincen.gov/statutes_regs/guidance/html/FIN-2013-G001.html)

The definition of a money transmitter does not differentiate between real currencies and convertible virtual currencies. Accepting and transmitting anything of value that substitutes for currency makes a person a money transmitter under the regulations implementing the BSA.12 FinCEN has reviewed different activities involving virtual currency and has made determinations regarding the appropriate regulatory treatment of administrators and exchangers under three scenarios: brokers and dealers of e-currencies and e-precious metals; centralized convertible virtual currencies; and de-centralized convertible virtual currencies.

None of the cryptos are convertible to fiat in the USA though, are they. Therefore they are not convertible currencies. Cryptsy has never quoted any dollars in any of their trades - they weren't treating them as convertible to fiat at all. You were simply barterring one alt for another. You'd have a devil of a job proving XPM, sexcoin and others are convertible.

From Cryptsy's own TOS:

12. BSA / FinCEN

Cryptsy is registered with the BSA as an MSB (Money Services Business). Cryptsy may be required to file details of account activity to this organization from time to time.

Ok that's interesting. Wonder why they did that - probably because of the problems MtGox had when they registered under the wrong thing - or perhaps because they were intending to offer conversion to dollars in the future?


Title: Re: delete
Post by: Kryptox on December 17, 2013, 02:43:23 AM
It just trades alts, which are all imaginary tokens under the law, like Second Life money and Star Wars Galaxy money. It's not regulated by anyone, it's just "tokens" being bartered back and forth.

I am not sure that is accurate: http://www.fincen.gov/statutes_regs/guidance/html/FIN-2013-G001.html (http://www.fincen.gov/statutes_regs/guidance/html/FIN-2013-G001.html)

The definition of a money transmitter does not differentiate between real currencies and convertible virtual currencies. Accepting and transmitting anything of value that substitutes for currency makes a person a money transmitter under the regulations implementing the BSA.12 FinCEN has reviewed different activities involving virtual currency and has made determinations regarding the appropriate regulatory treatment of administrators and exchangers under three scenarios: brokers and dealers of e-currencies and e-precious metals; centralized convertible virtual currencies; and de-centralized convertible virtual currencies.

None of the cryptos are convertible to fiat in the USA though, are they. Therefore they are not convertible currencies. Cryptsy has never quoted any dollars in any of their trades - they weren't treating them as convertible to fiat at all. You were simply barterring one alt for another. You'd have a devil of a job proving XPM, sexcoin and others are convertible.

From Cryptsy's own TOS:

12. BSA / FinCEN

Cryptsy is registered with the BSA as an MSB (Money Services Business). Cryptsy may be required to file details of account activity to this organization from time to time.

Really?  Are they moving money?  No.

This is them preparing for opening USD markets which they have not completed yet.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: tinybike on December 17, 2013, 02:48:00 AM
Go die in a hole. No one here likes you.

Blame the victim much?  He says the crooks at Cryptsy cheated him out of his money, so he reported them.  What other recourse does he have?  Should he just sit there and take it, because otherwise he risks upsetting your precious gravy train?  For fuck's sake, if he's been defrauded, what he's doing is absolutely fair.  Way too many people on this board are taking the Cryptsy's side even if the OP was actually cheated.

Let me tell you: if you think that, you are what's going to make this house of cards come tumbling down.  Because there's a limit to the amount of abuse people will put up with, and eventually, it gets reported, and then the show's over.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: hypostatization on December 17, 2013, 02:49:51 AM
Really?  Are they moving money?  No.

Is that legally clear in US courts at this point? I am not sure what case precedent exists.

Definition of real currency vs. convertible virtual currency:

FinCEN defines “real” currency as (i) a jurisdiction’s coin and paper money that is (ii) designated as legal tender for that jurisdiction and (iii) is customarily used and accepted as a medium of exchange in the jurisdiction.  A “virtual” currency is “a medium of exchange that operates like a currency in some environments, but does not have all the attributes of real currency.” “Convertible” virtual currency is a virtual currency that has “an equivalent value in real currency, or acts as a substitute for real currency.” Virtual currencies and convertible virtual currencies are not legal tender in any jurisdiction.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: mackcowanii on December 17, 2013, 02:50:05 AM
You're a fucking piece of shit and I sincerely hope something bad happens to you.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: MicroGuy on December 17, 2013, 02:55:23 AM
http://s3.amazonaws.com/rapgenius/1346139160_cantwealljustgetalong.jpg


Title: Re: delete
Post by: alyssa85 on December 17, 2013, 02:59:45 AM
Really?  Are they moving money?  No.

Is that legally clear in US courts at this point? I am not sure what case precedent exists.

Definition of real currency vs. convertible virtual currency:

FinCEN defines “real” currency as (i) a jurisdiction’s coin and paper money that is (ii) designated as legal tender for that jurisdiction and (iii) is customarily used and accepted as a medium of exchange in the jurisdiction.  A “virtual” currency is “a medium of exchange that operates like a currency in some environments, but does not have all the attributes of real currency.” “Convertible” virtual currency is a virtual currency that has “an equivalent value in real currency, or acts as a substitute for real currency.” Virtual currencies and convertible virtual currencies are not legal tender in any jurisdiction.

But were the alts being used as a "substitute for real currency", or were they just goods that had a value assigned. eg you can trade a car for money, but the car is not a substitute for money, it's a good that has a value assigned.  

With egold, the entire point of the business was moving dollars into egold and then out of them. Cryptsy is just bartering virtual tokens back and forth, no dollars involved at all. Second Life Linden dollars are traded on LindeX for dollars, but I think they are treated as a good, like a car or an ipad, not as a currency. So you are using your US dollars to buy a good rather than a substitute for real money.  If anyone knows more about their status, please post.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: WillBit on December 17, 2013, 03:01:10 AM
Some were saying that Paul Vernon aka BigVern doesn't visit the forums. I know for a fact that BigVern does indeed look at these boards as I received a PM in response to my thread Cryptsy - Complaint Filed with the Florida Attorney General located here - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=361514.

The answer is no, there is nothing you can do to make this right and that's not how this works anyway. The damage and losses you caused by "borrowing the deposits" is done. You must really think people are stupid and can't clearly see what you have done. Before the new update BitJohn had said numerous times that Cryptsy had somewhere just over 10,000 users. Sounds about right.

It's fair to assume that 90% of them are small traders averaging less than 1 BTC at any given time. Then there is the rest with more and the top 3%-4% with significant amounts trading at any given time. As a trader you can't make very much money with small trades and I was one of the people with significant amounts at any given time. The bottom 90% alone were probably worth 1500 to 2000 BTC and the top 10% worth several times that. BitJohn has also indicated that about 100 BTC/ month was your revenue stream from fees. It's easy to see there is a magnitude of order more on deposit than brought in by fees.

What Cryptsy did was borrow from the customers deposits before the peak of $1200 per BTC and got caught off guard by a rapidly rising market with everybody wanting their BTC NOW and you didn't have them to give.

I do believe you intended to roll out the new update but not as soon as you did. The new roll out and it's subsequent comedy of "errors" were nothing more than a cover while you scrambled to find the funds to put out the fires. I also believe in your panic you further borrowed at the peak, sold high and are now buying back at a 30% discount and returning deposits slowly. That explains why about 45 BTC worth of my coins have been deposited manually into my accounts over the course of the past week.

At the peak, my 63 BTC was worth about $75,000. Today as you are returning it slowly it is worth about $50,000 and falling. You have cost me at least $25,000 by tying up my funds in this botched borrow. That's just me and I can assure people the cumulative damage runs well into the millions.

Now here's the part you need to pay attention to. Early on all I asked for was some detailed explanation from you on exactly what is going on. Nothing more and you remained silent and now are aware that I did indeed file a complaint with the Florida AG. A 140 character cryptic message on Twitter doesn't cut it.

Maybe I am wrong. Maybe just because it walks like a duck, talks like duck and has the DNA of a duck, it really isn't a duck. If I were you, I would break my oath of silence, come here and explain exactly what happened. You might also consider making my deposits right according to the BTC peak as you know exactly who I am.

If you choose to further ignore the call for an explanation from you, as you did earlier which resulted in the aforementioned complaint, I will start organizing Cryptsy customers into a class and will file a complaint with the FTC. I will also on their behalf come after Cryptsy and Cryptsy's investors for the damages caused by at best, incompetence and more than likely nefarious. Will I win? Who knows. But I do know that getting complaints to the AG and the FTC as well getting your investors sued is a fast track to nowhere really fast. I suggest you create a user modded thread and start explaining.




OP is a narc-ass bitch!


Title: Re: delete
Post by: hypostatization on December 17, 2013, 03:08:57 AM
But were the alts being used as a "substitute for real currency", or were they just goods that had a value assigned. eg you can trade a car for money, but the car is not a substitute for money, it's a good that has a value assigned.

Cryptsy also handles Bitcoin. I wonder what impact that could have in court. It will be interesting to see how this all develops.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: Mylon on December 17, 2013, 05:34:50 AM
The amount of hate in this thread is just sad... I'm gonna go back and hit the ignore button a couple of times. (update: so a dozen people addded)

To OP, hope Cryptsy answers but ain't looking that way. Also do you happen to have a source for the funds lending claim?

If it's true what they did, they deserve to get crushed.

To the kind souls in this thread, awesome job trying to keep up the positive attitude.

To the rest... Does your mother know you like to spread so much hate on the internet, and what would she say about it? Enjoy it while it lasts, 5 years from now the NSA will put a stop to it.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: Malooka on December 17, 2013, 05:49:41 AM
How about reading terms before using any service?

Without prejudice to any other terms of this Agreement, relating to the limitation of liability and provision of indemnities, the following clauses shall apply to our Electronic Services.

    j. System errors

We shall have no liability to you for damage which you may suffer as a result of transmission errors, technical faults, malfunctions, illegal intervention in network equipment, network overloads, malicious blocking of access by third parties, internet malfunctions, interruptions or other deficiencies on the part of internet service providers. You acknowledge that access to Electronic Services may be limited or unavailable due to such system errors, and that we reserve the right upon notice to suspend access to Electronic Services for this reason.

   

Since Cryptsy states the terms above, it goes both ways, right?

e.g. the guy who mistakenly was able to withdraw 60 BTC was under no obligation to return it since Cryptsy clearly states they shall have no liability for all the above - the user shouldn't either.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: HPWolf on December 17, 2013, 07:46:06 AM
All the people that think Cryptsy is great, give it time.

I too was very happy with Cryptsy as they were trading coins others never had and everything was going great.
Then i lost a very small amount of QRK that i deposited into my account. I opened a support ticket for and waited, three weeks later ..... nothing so i decided to remove all my coins and move on.

That's where the fun started, says i have withdrawn funds, nothing has shown up in my wallets and now my account is in a negative balance and i cant do anything.
After waiting for support for 3 weeks for some QRK, i can just assume i wont hear anything from anybody for a long time, services like these are not needed and flaming somebody cause he is trying to make it public is also wrong.

I have only lost a little bit, but that little bit is all i had and its really depressing when you put all your effort in to try and make some coin and some stupid exchange just gobbles it up and ignores you.

My sympathy goes out to the people that have lost allot more then me and i do hope Cryptsy does sort out there problems and return our coins even after waiting 3 weeks and it does not look that promising.
I am opening another ticket today to see what can be done about removing the rest of my coins, hopefully there will be some sort of response.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: achillez on December 18, 2013, 02:47:18 AM
it seems a little silly that...op took the anonymous out of bitcoin trade.. whats the taxes due on 63 BTC? and other previous undeclared earnings..

Seems funny to walk into a place... and show them a whole bunch of your undeclared earnings... your trade history.. etc.. anyone with a comp can sign into/onto cryptsy and anyone calculate 1 BTC = $1000, but showing them your trade history... makes the whole thing silly.

I'd be excited to if i was with the IRS and it wouldnt be for finding out about cryptsy.

uh I sure as heck hope that people declare their BTC earnings. There's nothing anonymous about the bitcoin ledger and address/IP tracking.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: this1dude on December 18, 2013, 03:08:54 AM
it seems a little silly that...op took the anonymous out of bitcoin trade.. whats the taxes due on 63 BTC? and other previous undeclared earnings..

Seems funny to walk into a place... and show them a whole bunch of your undeclared earnings... your trade history.. etc.. anyone with a comp can sign into/onto cryptsy and anyone calculate 1 BTC = $1000, but showing them your trade history... makes the whole thing silly.

I'd be excited to if i was with the IRS and it wouldnt be for finding out about cryptsy.

uh I sure as heck hope that people declare their BTC earnings. There's nothing anonymous about the bitcoin ledger and address/IP tracking.

SBC mixing service, when it gets implemented looks promising in this department


Title: Re: delete
Post by: BrewCrewFan on December 18, 2013, 03:14:55 AM
it seems a little silly that...op took the anonymous out of bitcoin trade.. whats the taxes due on 63 BTC? and other previous undeclared earnings..

Seems funny to walk into a place... and show them a whole bunch of your undeclared earnings... your trade history.. etc.. anyone with a comp can sign into/onto cryptsy and anyone calculate 1 BTC = $1000, but showing them your trade history... makes the whole thing silly.

I'd be excited to if i was with the IRS and it wouldnt be for finding out about cryptsy.

uh I sure as heck hope that people declare their BTC earnings. There's nothing anonymous about the bitcoin ledger and address/IP tracking.

No I hope that the OP claims his/her earnings on the taxes.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: Mad Scientist on December 18, 2013, 03:16:23 AM
Some people here are protecting Cyptsy like the US Gov't protects the Federal Reserve!

Getting this ironed out in as a transparent way as possible will only strengthen the ENTIRE Crypto Community.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: rapidfire187 on December 18, 2013, 03:45:27 AM
Don't ripple the waters You might create a tidal wave that will hit only you. K.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: jerrybusey on December 18, 2013, 11:17:30 AM
Once the dust settles from the current crash companies like Cryptsy will probably get a little breathing room as volumes decrease. Of course it may get worse in the short term as people panic and try to get into fiat as fast as possible.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: Slingshot on December 18, 2013, 01:54:37 PM
Once the dust settles from the current crash companies like Cryptsy will probably get a little breathing room as volumes decrease. Of course it may get worse in the short term as people panic and try to get into fiat as fast as possible.


 First my sympathies towards everyone that believes they have been victimized.

 Second my sympathies towards Cryptsy whom most here believe are ethically trying, but obviously overwhelmed at the very least.

 

But...:

 I don't trust the motivations of someone (the OP) that is also clamoring for another Exchange, an extremely shady one, to reopen, in another thread here at bitcointalk.org !

 Does the OP have a position in the profits by way of profit shares or whatever, at that other Exchange still closed ???



Caveat emptor - let the buyer beware!




Title: Re: delete
Post by: WillBit on December 18, 2013, 02:00:21 PM
OP is a snitch:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1JJkMD1hE4&noredirect=1


Title: Re: delete
Post by: rikkejohn on December 18, 2013, 02:20:07 PM
Turning on the OP is pointless. Cryptsy is in trouble, and if people think they only handed out 60 BTC (then worth $60k) they are wrong. The Cryptsy forum was littered with posts about people with negative balances (have been allowed to spend twice). Many of the posts seem to have disappeared. This forum has posts saying similar. BTC-e Troll Box has people claiming the same.  

I just managed to double spend again this morning on one of my accounts (I have another account with minus 10 LTCs). I put an order in, the order was accepted. But the coins stayed in my balance. I made the same order again, and left things. Five minutes later both orders execute.

My balance looks fine, yet I know it is not. So I tested with the self-audit, and sure enough I suddenly had a negative (which I subsequently paid off).

So I could have, assuming the withdrawal is working (it is not actually (lol)), taken Cryptsy money and transferred it out.

How many people have done this? Given all the lag crap, I'm sure we're talking about a hell of lot of Cryptsy money leaving the exchange by mistake.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: Slingshot on December 18, 2013, 02:26:35 PM


Just hold all your coins till mcxNOW comes back online with v3!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=345627.msg3748747#msg3748747


Title: Re: delete
Post by: Slingshot on December 18, 2013, 02:29:01 PM
The bad news for Tradehill is that they are based out of San Francisco. Being based out of the USA is a huge liability that no serious investor is willing to take. If the US Government decides they want to freeze Tradehill, it is as simple as phone call and quick orders from the court to the bank.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=52382.msg631163#msg631163


Title: Re: delete
Post by: TribalBob on December 18, 2013, 04:30:16 PM
Lmao.  It's only 63 BTC you idiot. 

I'm sure you wouldn't be complaining if BTC was climbing to 2k at the moment when you might have sold them at their low.

Sounds like you should not be anywhere near crypto currencies at the moment.  You might want to wait until the only way to buy goods is by using Bitcoins before considering owning any.  You're not built for it.


WTF... What do you mean ONLY 63 BTC...?

If you've got BTC to just throw away like that where 63 BTC doesn't mean shit to you, please feel free to throw some BTC away in this direction...


Title: Re: delete
Post by: HPWolf on December 18, 2013, 06:11:43 PM
Lmao.  It's only 63 BTC you idiot. 

I'm sure you wouldn't be complaining if BTC was climbing to 2k at the moment when you might have sold them at their low.

Sounds like you should not be anywhere near crypto currencies at the moment.  You might want to wait until the only way to buy goods is by using Bitcoins before considering owning any.  You're not built for it.


WTF... What do you mean ONLY 63 BTC...?

If you've got BTC to just throw away like that where 63 BTC doesn't mean shit to you, please feel free to throw some BTC away in this direction...

+1 :)


Title: Re: delete
Post by: Malooka on December 20, 2013, 01:55:46 AM

It's fair to assume that 90% of them are small traders averaging less than 1 BTC at any given time. Then there is the rest with more and the top 3%-4% with significant amounts trading at any given time. As a trader you can't make very much money with small trades and I was one of the people with significant amounts at any given time. The bottom 90% alone were probably worth 1500 to 2000 BTC and the top 10% worth several times that. BitJohn has also indicated that about 100 BTC/ month was your revenue stream from fees. It's easy to see there is a magnitude of order more on deposit than brought in by fees.


Lmao.  It's only 63 BTC you idiot. 


I get tired of reading such stupid responses.

If it's "only 63 BTC" then send 25% of that amount to someone on this thread.  Not me - just pick someone at random, get their address, and send it.  It's ONLY 15.75 BTC, such a miniscule amount to a big man like you, right?

Now put up or shut up.

I didn't think so, "idiot."


Title: Re: delete
Post by: NWO on March 25, 2014, 09:10:32 AM
Soooo this never got sorted out?  ;D


Title: Re: delete
Post by: ysbysb2000 on March 26, 2014, 04:27:31 AM
If you can be bothered to do all of this why not just go and meet them face-to-face and sort it out like that? Much easier.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: LiteCoinGuy on June 11, 2014, 05:36:33 PM
is here a staff from crypsy on bitcointalk ? their support seems not good (or there is none)  ::)


Title: Re: delete
Post by: spazzdla on June 11, 2014, 07:09:13 PM
is here a staff from crypsy on bitcointalk ? their support seems not good (or there is none)  ::)

Doubtful, the eventually respond.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: tranzactionezlive on January 13, 2016, 06:14:12 PM
Yes , the staff are the people attacking the op disguised in the average user.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: Blawpaw on January 13, 2016, 07:36:52 PM
It seems that they didn't borrow anything. Instead, they stole it. Now, this is gonna be MTGox 2.0 and I wonder what can it do to the trust on cryptos built along 2015...


Title: Re: delete
Post by: TrueAnon on January 13, 2016, 07:39:44 PM
Personally I find it scary and dumb for ANYONE to leave any type of funds on cryptsy right now, it's simply going downhill and won't be much longer until they're out of business...leaving many folks fucked.  Get out of there while you still can, I know I did awhile back.


Title: Re: delete
Post by: tranzactionezlive on January 27, 2016, 10:07:31 AM
Personally I find it scary and dumb for ANYONE to leave any type of funds on cryptsy right now, it's simply going downhill and won't be much longer until they're out of business...leaving many folks fucked.  Get out of there while you still can, I know I did awhile back.


I've been trying to for at least a couple of months however i keep banging my head on a wall of uncooperation on their part, citing vague and mischievous reasons for not giving what is mine.

I'm really tired of repeating myself and reading the same crap.

We'll see, if they don't comply i've gathered enough video evidence for....anything i want to do with it including legal bombardment. What's valuable if not videos that show.....lies, and more...lies. Who's lies ? Paul knows.