Bitcoin Forum

Bitcoin => Hardware => Topic started by: Inaba on December 24, 2013, 02:18:19 PM



Title: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: Inaba on December 24, 2013, 02:18:19 PM
The signal to noise ratio here is astounding >:(
There is no signal at all, and it's not our fault.

You and the trolls like you are the explicit example of who's fault it is.


Title: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: cedivad on December 24, 2013, 02:19:28 PM
You and the trolls like you are the explicit example of who's fault it is.
Hey josh, how are you doing? Have you tried to install the blockchain app on your android yet? Do you still need lessons?


Title: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: CYPER on December 24, 2013, 02:29:59 PM
The signal to noise ratio here is astounding >:(
There is no signal at all, and it's not our fault.

You and the trolls like you are the explicit example of who's fault it is.


You are the prime reason for what is wrong with the entire ASIC industry. Go back to your cave.


Title: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: Inaba on December 24, 2013, 03:02:56 PM
Josh is probably taking a % of HF profits due to it's suggestions to john. So there is really no point in asking him it's opinion on HF. I will always remember how sure he was that KNC was gonna be late when we meet, it must have been because he knew that KNC was legit.

And I was right... KNC was late.  They promised summer delivery and didn't deliver until, what... October?



Title: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: Bargraphics on December 24, 2013, 03:04:57 PM
Josh is probably taking a % of HF profits due to it's suggestions to john. So there is really no point in asking him it's opinion on HF. I will always remember how sure he was that KNC was gonna be late when we meet, it must have been because he knew that KNC was legit.

KNC was late.  They promised summer delivery and didn't deliver until, what... October?



They promised "September" delivery and didn't start delivering until October 4th.

Shouldn't you be posting about more delays for the Monarchs on the BFL Forums?

Ironic how you would come on their thread riddled with sympathy.


Title: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: cedivad on December 24, 2013, 03:15:20 PM
And I was right... KNC was late.  They promised summer delivery and didn't deliver until, what... October?
October? So 2 days after we meet and you was sure they would have never shipped? Right. Noted.

Shouldn't you be posting about more delays for the Monarchs on the BFL Forums?
Keeping the SNR low with zero or almost zero informations seems to be the new trend from BFL/HF. I guess that it makes sense, usually not giving bad news should calm everyone down.


Title: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: defcon23 on December 24, 2013, 03:38:33 PM
in august hashfast promised  to deliver their units to batch 1 customers for 15 october.
today we are on 24 december ... and they're insulting all of us by their fucking silence !
it's clear :HASHFAST IS A BIG BIG SCAM !
their model : BFL . that's all

The fun part is that they promissed October delivery and they got the chips on 5 December!
yes and first workings tests on 19 december ..... ( that's on their website ), really funny when you see what they promised in august  ;D


Title: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: Xian01 on December 24, 2013, 03:40:16 PM
... Bitcointalk being troll-city and ignored by most of the general public, unlike back when BFL started and Bitcointalk was somewhat reputable... so all the trolling, lying, FUD and general misinformation is largely irrelevant in todays world...

 * Mumbles something about COINTELPRO tactics - Attempting to discredit these very forums while contributing advertising revenue supporting the forums - Cognitive dissonance *

 Still looking good to ship a closed-loop, water-cooled, PCIe-card-form-factor 600GH/s 28nm Bitcoin mining product in volume by end of March 2014 ?


Title: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: ASIC-K on December 24, 2013, 03:48:39 PM
Josh is probably taking a % of HF profits due to it's suggestions to john. So there is really no point in asking him it's opinion on HF. I will always remember how sure he was that KNC was gonna be late when we meet, it must have been because he knew that KNC was legit.

And I was right... KNC was late.  They promised summer delivery and didn't deliver until, what... October?



haha you are such a douche it hurts. get the fuck out of here.


Title: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: j03 on December 24, 2013, 03:56:36 PM
Josh is probably taking a % of HF profits due to it's suggestions to john. So there is really no point in asking him it's opinion on HF. I will always remember how sure he was that KNC was gonna be late when we meet, it must have been because he knew that KNC was legit.

And I was right... KNC was late.  They promised summer delivery and didn't deliver until, what... October?



You are incorrect, sir. They said all of batch 1 will be in-hand by 15 Oct. They went approx 2 weeks over that mark. 2 weeks lost me about $1,000, but it could have been worse.


Title: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: Inaba on December 24, 2013, 04:57:47 PM
Josh is probably taking a % of HF profits due to it's suggestions to john. So there is really no point in asking him it's opinion on HF. I will always remember how sure he was that KNC was gonna be late when we meet, it must have been because he knew that KNC was legit.

And I was right... KNC was late.  They promised summer delivery and didn't deliver until, what... October?



You are incorrect, sir. They said all of batch 1 will be in-hand by 15 Oct. They went approx 2 weeks over that mark. 2 weeks lost me about $1,000, but it could have been worse.

Do you just like not read the first post of KNCminer or are you just a troll and/or liar?

Here, let me quote the relevent part for you (bolded for your pleasure):

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=170332.msg1771040#msg1771040

Quote
We will in the upcoming weeks opening our order book to allow the purchase of our first set of ASIC miners. They are in the early stages of development now and will be ready in the summer of 2013 (yes in just a few months)

KNC was months late.  Suck it.


Title: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: Searing on December 24, 2013, 05:01:49 PM
Josh is probably taking a % of HF profits due to it's suggestions to john. So there is really no point in asking him it's opinion on HF. I will always remember how sure he was that KNC was gonna be late when we meet, it must have been because he knew that KNC was legit.

And I was right... KNC was late.  They promised summer delivery and didn't deliver until, what... October?



KNC promised summer delivery on there FPGA protot ype of like 80gh or some such..FPGA unit ...forget the name......the btc community said it was too small too high priced..so they changed it to their proof of concept prototype...and did not deliver that in the summer they delivered their orig ASIC as they stated on time org 250gh was the estimated gh....always stated that for the fall ie sept  (or 1 week late for some folk)....so no the ASIC 400gh stated at the end became current ad  (which they gave us the other 550 gh for free mine does 555gh) was on time +/- a week....so don't spread false info.....ASIC we are talking here.

You want to improve BFL allow us to Xfer our forced to upgrade to  Monarch orders...never wanted one...forced to update due to your being way way behind on your estimated timeline....do that and some of us backed into the monarch orders will xfer to others who wish them (even at a loss) and move on...but imho I don't see you getting them to us till april at double the power and prob 1/2 the hash rate....(surprise me and allow transfers on our pre-order monarchs...if they are on time you can have the last laugh with whoever wants to take them off our hands)...anyway should not matter you can transfer the other older asic stuff ..why not monarchs...at least it would be a way out for me from any BFL product....

anyway my 7131.80 KNC unit has made ROI back even when the 900gh of monarch I got backed into arrives as bricks......hashing nicely at 555gh w/o issues....and 2 days before my Saturn shipped in OCT I canceled it and they refunded me in 4 hrs...so yeah..you could learn a lot from KNC especially the REFUND part ..but alas if you refunded then you would not have your new GH cloud hosting service off of our $$$ that should have gone into production way back this last summer....

anyway trying hard not to rag on your a*ss ...you just probably don't fathom how badly you (with benefit of doubt here at least in your own mind) "seem" to have mislead everyone ordering from BFL ...so consider some of the above..if you are on time/on task on the monarch extending xfer to monarchs should not be that big a deal.....(sorry josh but I really really want to dump them...in a somewhat pre-order legit manner..to whomever ...with warranty etc with a legit xfer option)...imho cut us loose with this added option....be to your benefit not like your previous customers with a choice (not like us forced to upgrade folks) will order from you again...no offense but once burnt don't ya know....that and the fact you are btc wire xfer only "no refunds" and KNC and some others are same but in KNC's case 'refunds up to shipping".....anyway I digress

do what you want I've moved on and covered my losses with bfl by about 4x....but if I we're you I'd consider the above....there are a lot of us who want to cut our losses with BFL even if at a loss...we just don't buy you will come thru on time/product/performance....if we are wrong you can have the last laugh and we've sold our monarch pre-orders for a loss and moved on...even if that is the case I doubt either of us in 2 month hindsight would regret the actions...at that point in time.

my 2c worth

Searing

(heh really really surprise me and everyone else and 'un-ban' me from shoutbox on BFL while your at it...I assume the odds are the same as my above suggestion)

Searing



Title: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: ASIC-K on December 24, 2013, 05:02:45 PM
Josh is probably taking a % of HF profits due to it's suggestions to john. So there is really no point in asking him it's opinion on HF. I will always remember how sure he was that KNC was gonna be late when we meet, it must have been because he knew that KNC was legit.

And I was right... KNC was late.  They promised summer delivery and didn't deliver until, what... October?



You are incorrect, sir. They said all of batch 1 will be in-hand by 15 Oct. They went approx 2 weeks over that mark. 2 weeks lost me about $1,000, but it could have been worse.

Do you just like not read the first post of KNCminer or are you just a troll and/or liar?

Here, let me quote the relevent part for you (bolded for your pleasure):

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=170332.msg1771040#msg1771040

Quote
We will in the upcoming weeks opening our order book to allow the purchase of our first set of ASIC miners. They are in the early stages of development now and will be ready in the summer of 2013 (yes in just a few months)

KNC was months late.  Suck it.


you know a thing or two about sucking it, don't you Josh.


Title: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: Inaba on December 24, 2013, 05:03:05 PM
Josh is probably taking a % of HF profits due to it's suggestions to john. So there is really no point in asking him it's opinion on HF. I will always remember how sure he was that KNC was gonna be late when we meet, it must have been because he knew that KNC was legit.

And I was right... KNC was late.  They promised summer delivery and didn't deliver until, what... October?



KNC promised summer delivery on there FPGA protot ype of like 80gh or some such..FPGA unit ...forget the name......the btc community said it was too small too high priced..so they changed it to their proof of concept prototype...and did not deliver that in the summer they delivered their orig ASIC as they stated on time org 250gh was the estimated gh....always stated that for the fall ie sept  (or 1 week late for some folk)....so no the ASIC 400gh stated at the end became current ad  (which they gave us the other 550 gh for free mine does 555gh) was on time +/- a week....so don't spread false info.....ASIC we are talking here.


Does it hurt to be so wrong all the time?


Title: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: ASIC-K on December 24, 2013, 05:05:07 PM
Josh is probably taking a % of HF profits due to it's suggestions to john. So there is really no point in asking him it's opinion on HF. I will always remember how sure he was that KNC was gonna be late when we meet, it must have been because he knew that KNC was legit.

And I was right... KNC was late.  They promised summer delivery and didn't deliver until, what... October?



KNC promised summer delivery on there FPGA protot ype of like 80gh or some such..FPGA unit ...forget the name......the btc community said it was too small too high priced..so they changed it to their proof of concept prototype...and did not deliver that in the summer they delivered their orig ASIC as they stated on time org 250gh was the estimated gh....always stated that for the fall ie sept  (or 1 week late for some folk)....so no the ASIC 400gh stated at the end became current ad  (which they gave us the other 550 gh for free mine does 555gh) was on time +/- a week....so don't spread false info.....ASIC we are talking here.

You want to improve BFL allow us to Xfer our forced to upgrade to  Monarch orders...never wanted one...forced to update due to your being way way behind on your estimated timeline....do that and some of us backed into the monarch orders will xfer to others who wish them (even at a loss) and move on...but imho I don't see you getting them to us till april at double the power and prob 1/2 the hash rate....(surprise me and allow transfers on our pre-order monarchs...if they are on time you can have the last laugh with whoever wants to take them off our hands)...anyway should not matter you can transfer the other older asic stuff ..why not monarchs...at least it would be a way out for me from any BFL product....

anyway my 7131.80 KNC unit has made ROI back even when the 900gh of monarch I got backed into arrives as bricks......hashing nicely at 555gh w/o issues....and 2 days before my Saturn shipped in OCT I canceled it and they refunded me in 4 hrs...so yeah..you could learn a lot from KNC especially the REFUND part ..but alas if you refunded then you would not have your new GH cloud hosting service off of our $$$ that should have gone into production way back this last summer....

anyway trying hard not to rag on your a*ss ...you just probably don't fathom how badly you (with benefit of doubt here at least in your own mind) "seem" to have mislead everyone ordering from BFL ...so consider some of the above..if you are on time/on task on the monarch extending xfer to monarchs should not be that big a deal.....(sorry josh but I really really want to dump them...in a somewhat pre-order legit manner..to whomever ...with warranty etc with a legit xfer option)...imho cut us loose with this added option....be to your benefit not like your previous customers with a choice (not like us forced to upgrade folks) will order from you again...no offense but once burnt don't ya know....that and the fact you are btc wire xfer only "no refunds" and KNC and some others are same but in KNC's case 'refunds up to shipping".....anyway I digress

do what you want I've moved on and covered my losses with bfl by about 4x....but if I we're you I'd consider the above....there are a lot of us who want to cut our losses with BFL even if at a loss...we just don't buy you will come thru on time/product/performance....if we are wrong you can have the last laugh and we've sold our monarch pre-orders for a loss and moved on...even if that is the case I doubt either of us in 2 month hindsight would regret the actions...at that point in time.

my 2c worth

Searing

(heh really really surprise me and everyone else and 'un-ban' me from shoutbox on BFL while your at it...I assume the odds are the same as my above suggestion)

Searing



Does it hurt to be so wrong all the time?

(Just wanted to quote your stupidity before you edited it.)

Does it hurt to be the most disliked individual in the bitcoin community?


Title: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: CYPER on December 24, 2013, 05:06:21 PM
Josh is probably taking a % of HF profits due to it's suggestions to john. So there is really no point in asking him it's opinion on HF. I will always remember how sure he was that KNC was gonna be late when we meet, it must have been because he knew that KNC was legit.

And I was right... KNC was late.  They promised summer delivery and didn't deliver until, what... October?



KNC promised summer delivery on there FPGA protot ype of like 80gh or some such..FPGA unit ...forget the name......the btc community said it was too small too high priced..so they changed it to their proof of concept prototype...and did not deliver that in the summer they delivered their orig ASIC as they stated on time org 250gh was the estimated gh....always stated that for the fall ie sept  (or 1 week late for some folk)....so no the ASIC 400gh stated at the end became current ad  (which they gave us the other 550 gh for free mine does 555gh) was on time +/- a week....so don't spread false info.....ASIC we are talking here.


Does it hurt to be so wrong all the time?


I am 100% confident that if you happen to die in the worst possible and painful way, 99% of the people on this forum would not care. Some would even feel a little happier inside.


Title: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: jspielberg on December 24, 2013, 05:07:03 PM
I think some folks are more likely to give KnC the benefit of the doubt because they didn't start off with a hard deadline like Oct. X through Y.  The "end of summer" I guess is technically September 22nd (in which case... they were late by a couple of weeks?) :^)

I do remember some teeth gnashing and some hand wringing in the beginning of October in the main KnC thread, but I think that was the normal trolling to get folks to claim refunds so as to reduce the expected hashrate.

Seems counter productive in this thread as there are no refunds currently. If refunds are being offered in a week... it will just lock in a larger loss than just mining with the thing (assuming the 10-day warranty is really just CYA and not an expected shelf life).


Title: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: Searing on December 24, 2013, 05:25:45 PM
Josh is probably taking a % of HF profits due to it's suggestions to john. So there is really no point in asking him it's opinion on HF. I will always remember how sure he was that KNC was gonna be late when we meet, it must have been because he knew that KNC was legit.

And I was right... KNC was late.  They promised summer delivery and didn't deliver until, what... October?



KNC promised summer delivery on there FPGA protot ype of like 80gh or some such..FPGA unit ...forget the name......the btc community said it was too small too high priced..so they changed it to their proof of concept prototype...and did not deliver that in the summer they delivered their orig ASIC as they stated on time org 250gh was the estimated gh....always stated that for the fall ie sept  (or 1 week late for some folk)....so no the ASIC 400gh stated at the end became current ad  (which they gave us the other 550 gh for free mine does 555gh) was on time +/- a week....so don't spread false info.....ASIC we are talking here.


Does it hurt to be so wrong all the time?


I stand corrected on that point....of course you we're more then  1 year late...and and basically told everyone  "2 more months" for that period of time...big whoop KNC gave me my unit oct 15th. and from the timeline you mention it was to be 250gh for the same price..and I got 555gh for the same price  (1st units we're 4wks late from my lot from your above calculations).....you told me in chat no later then AUG for my april jally ..I got it on Oct 31st Halloween......no option for refund after may 30th or so....yeah KNC is the villain here by being late ..right!

sheeh...

as to my other point...they refund you don't ..they give more hash for free..that same point of time on the post you quote they said there unit would be 250gh they delivered ..as you state correct....550gh or in my case 555gh ..gasp 4wks from the first units (I was in the middle) late...they refunded a 2nd order ...the day before  it shipped in 4hrs...had the refund in my account.

getting thru to you yet?  by the by your RMA button on shoutbox don't work or so people have been stating on here for a month

anyway.....I guess that is a NO on extending your customer transfer option to monarch customers.....too bad...now you have do deal with me some more

alas it was a good product bfl wise.....but this the problem/issue people have with bfl/you ...it is always to "your advantage" attitude and never your fault really is not gonna get BFL anyplace in the future imho....KNC made a mistake by allowing paypal on a www page which I took advantage of on their purchase option...they informed me it was a mistake asked for btc or wire xfer....I did the wire xfer ...my bank screwed up not KNC ..they held my very early order for 6 WEEKS on my word..and the fact I had paid and it was their option mistake and admited such to me and others in that boat...and I only had a weak copy of a pdf of the xfer.from my bank..i was sure after dealing with BFL I was sooo screwed.....in that they had no proof it was my bank error..they could have easlily kicked me to the curb ..they chose "NOT" to do so ...so imho that is what p*ss*s off everyone about BFL ....you never take the high road...never admit mistakes or misinformation....it is always the customers fault...if that had happened with you guy's assuming I did get thru...it would have been "tough luck' NEXT...silly way to try and get repeat customers...

so KNC can muck up some now/in the future whatever....they cut me slack I cut them slack..but the difference is they seem to WANT repeat customers from what I can tell of BFL btc/wire xfer no refunds ..forced updates etc..that shipped has sailed....run to your GH hosting farm as fast as possible before you close the bfl wing of your BTC enterprises..seems to be the theme ......

my 2c worth

Searing


  




Title: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: matthewh3 on December 24, 2013, 05:28:14 PM
Josh is probably taking a % of HF profits due to it's suggestions to john. So there is really no point in asking him it's opinion on HF. I will always remember how sure he was that KNC was gonna be late when we meet, it must have been because he knew that KNC was legit.

And I was right... KNC was late.  They promised summer delivery and didn't deliver until, what... October?



KNC promised summer delivery on there FPGA protot ype of like 80gh or some such..FPGA unit ...forget the name......the btc community said it was too small too high priced..so they changed it to their proof of concept prototype...and did not deliver that in the summer they delivered their orig ASIC as they stated on time org 250gh was the estimated gh....always stated that for the fall ie sept  (or 1 week late for some folk)....so no the ASIC 400gh stated at the end became current ad  (which they gave us the other 550 gh for free mine does 555gh) was on time +/- a week....so don't spread false info.....ASIC we are talking here.


Does it hurt to be so wrong all the time?


I am 100% confident that if you happen to die in the worst possible and painful way, 99% of the people on this forum would not care. Some would even feel a little happier inside.

He should be branded a scammer.  He profits from pre-order schemes where others lose out due to their blatant cons.  KNC is the only company worth even considering a pre-order with.


Title: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: Bargraphics on December 24, 2013, 05:28:35 PM
Do you just like not read the first post of KNCminer or are you just a troll and/or liar?

Here, let me quote the relevent part for you (bolded for your pleasure):

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=170332.msg1771040#msg1771040

Quote
We will in the upcoming weeks opening our order book to allow the purchase of our first set of ASIC miners. They are in the early stages of development now and will be ready in the summer of 2013 (yes in just a few months)

KNC was months late.  Suck it.

By meteorological record-keeping, summer ended on Aug. 31.
By astronomical definition, summer didn't end until the autumnal equinox, which occurred on Sept. 22 in 2013.

I wouldn't call a maximum of 34 Days (using the meteorological date) "months"

If we use the astronomical definition then they were only late by 15 days on their very first deadline (Which they changed not too long after to September), not bad especially when comparing to BFL but then again BFL makes HashFast look good still.

Since Josh likes to pick and choose what he quotes, he should also quote the 250GH Jupiters that they said back then as well, only to be ~500GH in October and now closer to ~650GH.

Looks like someone thought he was clever.


Title: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: Xian01 on December 24, 2013, 05:42:12 PM
Does it hurt to be the most disliked individual in the bitcoin community?

 The evidence points towards it being a point of pride :(


Title: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: RoadStress on December 24, 2013, 06:15:12 PM
Josh is probably taking a % of HF profits due to it's suggestions to john. So there is really no point in asking him it's opinion on HF. I will always remember how sure he was that KNC was gonna be late when we meet, it must have been because he knew that KNC was legit.

And I was right... KNC was late.  They promised summer delivery and didn't deliver until, what... October?



KNC promised summer delivery on there FPGA protot ype of like 80gh or some such..FPGA unit ...forget the name......the btc community said it was too small too high priced..so they changed it to their proof of concept prototype...and did not deliver that in the summer they delivered their orig ASIC as they stated on time org 250gh was the estimated gh....always stated that for the fall ie sept  (or 1 week late for some folk)....so no the ASIC 400gh stated at the end became current ad  (which they gave us the other 550 gh for free mine does 555gh) was on time +/- a week....so don't spread false info.....ASIC we are talking here.


Does it hurt to be so wrong all the time?


I am 100% confident that if you happen to die in the worst possible and painful way, 99% of the people on this forum would not care. Some would even feel a little happier inside.

He should be branded a scammer.  He profits from pre-order schemes where others lose out due to their blatant cons.  KNC is the only company worth even considering a pre-order with.

Not as long as Thermos can make some money from ads!


Title: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: Inaba on December 24, 2013, 06:21:01 PM
I stand corrected on that point....of course you we're more then  1 year late...and and basically told everyone  "2 more months" for that period of time...big whoop KNC gave me my unit oct 15th. and from the timeline you mention it was to be 250gh for the same price..and I got 555gh for the same price  (1st units we're 4wks late from my lot from your above calculations).....you told me in chat no later then AUG for my april jally ..I got it on Oct 31st Halloween......no option for refund after may 30th or so....yeah KNC is the villain here by being late ..right!

You didn't answer the question... does it hurt being wrong all the time?

BFL was 6 months late, not 1 year, unless the calendar has changed in the past 2000  years or so?  November - April = 6 months, not 12 months.  Did you add a few extra months in there to make yourself feel better?

Since Josh likes to pick and choose what he quotes, he should also quote the 250GH Jupiters that they said back then as well, only to be ~500GH in October and now closer to ~650GH.

Since you have a selective memory:  BFL promised hashrate 40 GH/s Single. BFL delivered hashrate: 60 GH/s single. And now closer to 70 GH/s.

Quote
Looks like someone thought he was clever.

Sure does.


Title: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: Bargraphics on December 24, 2013, 06:33:36 PM
I stand corrected on that point....of course you we're more then  1 year late...and and basically told everyone  "2 more months" for that period of time...big whoop KNC gave me my unit oct 15th. and from the timeline you mention it was to be 250gh for the same price..and I got 555gh for the same price  (1st units we're 4wks late from my lot from your above calculations).....you told me in chat no later then AUG for my april jally ..I got it on Oct 31st Halloween......no option for refund after may 30th or so....yeah KNC is the villain here by being late ..right!

You didn't answer the question... does it hurt being wrong all the time?

BFL was 6 months late, not 1 year, unless the calendar has changed in the past 2000  years or so?  November - April = 6 months, not 12 months.  Did you add a few extra months in there to make yourself feel better?

Since Josh likes to pick and choose what he quotes, he should also quote the 250GH Jupiters that they said back then as well, only to be ~500GH in October and now closer to ~650GH.

Since you have a selective memory:  BFL promised hashrate 40 GH/s Single. BFL delivered hashrate: 60 GH/s single. And now closer to 70 GH/s.

Quote
Looks like someone thought he was clever.

Sure does.

Trying to figure out what your 6 months late ~50% increased hashrate has to do with my selective memory and more so what it is supposed to prove against a 34 to 15 Day Late ~120% increase.

Also if you have anything else you'd like debunked please PM me as you are taking this hashfast thread off topic.


Title: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: Inaba on December 24, 2013, 06:39:33 PM
Also if you have anything else you'd like debunked please PM me as you are taking this hashfast thread off topic.

"Anything else" implies that you've already debunked something.  So far the only thing you've done is continue to spread misinformation and increase the entropy of Bitcointalk. But by all means, please continue the bitchfest in this thread of the same people posting the same shit over and over ad infinitum... you're doing a service to... something.  I think.



Title: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: Syke on December 24, 2013, 06:42:46 PM
KNC was months late.  Suck it.

Summer ends Sept 21. They shipped about 5 weeks later. So no, they were not "months" late. And clearly someone who was 6 months late shouldn't be criticizing others.


Title: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: ASIC-K on December 24, 2013, 06:45:13 PM
Also if you have anything else you'd like debunked please PM me as you are taking this hashfast thread off topic.

"Anything else" implies that you've already debunked something.  So far the only thing you've done is continue to spread misinformation and increase the entropy of Bitcointalk. But by all means, please continue the bitchfest in this thread of the same people posting the same shit over and over ad infinitum... you're doing a service to... something.  I think.



you also charged for your "upgrades". please, please die.


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: Xian01 on December 24, 2013, 06:57:15 PM
you're doing a service to... something.  I think.

A service to you in helping generate sales ?

https://i.imgur.com/G2bBvQx.png


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: RoadStress on December 24, 2013, 07:14:34 PM
Also if you have anything else you'd like debunked please PM me as you are taking this hashfast thread off topic.

"Anything else" implies that you've already debunked something.  So far the only thing you've done is continue to spread misinformation and increase the entropy of Bitcointalk. But by all means, please continue the bitchfest in this thread of the same people posting the same shit over and over ad infinitum... you're doing a service to... something.  I think.



you also charged for your "upgrades". please, please die.

Please cry some more, I like to hear how you whine like a bitch.



Please honor your bets if you want to have some credibility here!


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: minternj on December 24, 2013, 07:16:26 PM
Merry xmas?


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: CYPER on December 24, 2013, 07:16:30 PM
That idiot has some skewed perception of reality, thinking that any sane person would actually buy a BFL product by choice.
Not when the word "BFL" has been turned into a term with a definition meaning:

1. To have something you ordered - delivered so far behind schedule, that it is no longer useful to you. Especially in cases where delays are 100+ days and the manufacturer or reseller is refusing to offer a refund for the goods.
2. Scammed
3. Completely fucked over


BFL is what's wrong with the Bitcoin ASIC industry and I truly hope they go bankrupt.


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: Inaba on December 24, 2013, 07:21:00 PM
That idiot has some skewed perception of reality, thinking that any sane person would actually buy a BFL product by choice.
Not when the word "BFL" has been turned into a term with a definition meaning:

1. To have something you ordered - delivered so far behind schedule, that it is no longer useful to you. Especially in cases where delays are 100+ days and the manufacturer or reseller is refusing to offer a refund for the goods.
2. Scammed
3. Completely fucked over


BFL is what's wrong with the Bitcoin ASIC industry and I truly hope they go bankrupt.


I'm glad I can ruin your Christmas then!  Your hopes and dreams are shattered!  Merry Christmas!



Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: CYPER on December 24, 2013, 07:23:41 PM
That idiot has some skewed perception of reality, thinking that any sane person would actually buy a BFL product by choice.
Not when the word "BFL" has been turned into a term with a definition meaning:

1. To have something you ordered - delivered so far behind schedule, that it is no longer useful to you. Especially in cases where delays are 100+ days and the manufacturer or reseller is refusing to offer a refund for the goods.
2. Scammed
3. Completely fucked over


BFL is what's wrong with the Bitcoin ASIC industry and I truly hope they go bankrupt.


I'm glad I can ruin your Christmas then!  Your hopes and dreams are shattered!  Merry Christmas!



Future tense. English motherf***er, do you speak it  ???


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: RoadStress on December 24, 2013, 07:28:35 PM
That idiot has some skewed perception of reality, thinking that any sane person would actually buy a BFL product by choice.
Not when the word "BFL" has been turned into a term with a definition meaning:

1. To have something you ordered - delivered so far behind schedule, that it is no longer useful to you. Especially in cases where delays are 100+ days and the manufacturer or reseller is refusing to offer a refund for the goods.
2. Scammed
3. Completely fucked over


BFL is what's wrong with the Bitcoin ASIC industry and I truly hope they go bankrupt.


I'm glad I can ruin your Christmas then!  Your hopes and dreams are shattered!  Merry Christmas!



Future tense. English motherf***er, do you speak it  ???

Ask him about his failed power consumption bet and he will just shut up and go to a corner.


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: Bogart on December 24, 2013, 07:40:22 PM
Inaba welched on a 1000 BTC bet that he personally made here on the forums:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=191600.0

Why no scammer tag?

MNW earned a scammer tag for the same offense:
http://codinginmysleep.com/et-tu-matt-bitcoin-mag-founder-welches-on-big-bet/

On a side note, I have a 5 BTC bet going myself regarding whether HF will deliver by year's-end.  Should I lose you can be assured I will be paying up, and should I fail to, I will be expecting the tag.


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: CYPER on December 24, 2013, 07:44:07 PM
That idiot has some skewed perception of reality, thinking that any sane person would actually buy a BFL product by choice.
Not when the word "BFL" has been turned into a term with a definition meaning:

1. To have something you ordered - delivered so far behind schedule, that it is no longer useful to you. Especially in cases where delays are 100+ days and the manufacturer or reseller is refusing to offer a refund for the goods.
2. Scammed
3. Completely fucked over


BFL is what's wrong with the Bitcoin ASIC industry and I truly hope they go bankrupt.


I'm glad I can ruin your Christmas then!  Your hopes and dreams are shattered!  Merry Christmas!



Future tense. English motherf***er, do you speak it  ???

Ask him about his failed power consumption bet and he will just shut up and go to a corner.

You can't expect a crook to be honest. That is a trait reserved to good and decent people.


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: ASIC-K on December 24, 2013, 07:45:34 PM
That idiot has some skewed perception of reality, thinking that any sane person would actually buy a BFL product by choice.
Not when the word "BFL" has been turned into a term with a definition meaning:

1. To have something you ordered - delivered so far behind schedule, that it is no longer useful to you. Especially in cases where delays are 100+ days and the manufacturer or reseller is refusing to offer a refund for the goods.
2. Scammed
3. Completely fucked over


BFL is what's wrong with the Bitcoin ASIC industry and I truly hope they go bankrupt.


I'm glad I can ruin your Christmas then!  Your hopes and dreams are shattered!  Merry Christmas!



i hope your family dies in a car accident tomorrow. merry christmas!


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: CYPER on December 24, 2013, 07:48:18 PM
That idiot has some skewed perception of reality, thinking that any sane person would actually buy a BFL product by choice.
Not when the word "BFL" has been turned into a term with a definition meaning:

1. To have something you ordered - delivered so far behind schedule, that it is no longer useful to you. Especially in cases where delays are 100+ days and the manufacturer or reseller is refusing to offer a refund for the goods.
2. Scammed
3. Completely fucked over


BFL is what's wrong with the Bitcoin ASIC industry and I truly hope they go bankrupt.


I'm glad I can ruin your Christmas then!  Your hopes and dreams are shattered!  Merry Christmas!



i hope your family dies in a car accident tomorrow. merry christmas!

Dude, why would you assume he has a family  ???
Who can possibly bear to live with such a person?


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: Bitcoinorama on December 24, 2013, 08:57:25 PM
Josh is probably taking a % of HF profits due to it's suggestions to john. So there is really no point in asking him it's opinion on HF. I will always remember how sure he was that KNC was gonna be late when we meet, it must have been because he knew that KNC was legit.

And I was right... KNC was late.  They promised summer delivery and didn't deliver until, what... October?



No, you were wrong they suggested summer before they even finalised a product offering, generated enough interest to JV with ORSoC, held an open day and opened for sales.

At the point they held an open day and most importantly opened for sales September was on the cards, and uploading a working unit well beyond the promised specs 45 mins before October began was quite the coup de grâce. I was there in person they really did get their shit together in just over 24 hours, and that's a hard act to follow.

When I first contacted them I stated exactly this; "this is a burnt community, make sure you under promise and over deliver." The whole margins thing to shy on the side of what was achievable was always in the cards, they knew precisely what they were doing, as such people are happy.

Perhaps this only a small community in the grand scheme of things and fresh newbie blood exists frequently enough outside the forum to sustain poor business practice, but this has always been the home of Bitcoin and a tarnished rep here will carry fourth...in essence you reap what you sow.

I have no beef with you Josh but you're talking whack above, and you know it.


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: Inaba on December 24, 2013, 09:12:52 PM
Josh is probably taking a % of HF profits due to it's suggestions to john. So there is really no point in asking him it's opinion on HF. I will always remember how sure he was that KNC was gonna be late when we meet, it must have been because he knew that KNC was legit.

And I was right... KNC was late.  They promised summer delivery and didn't deliver until, what... October?



No, you were wrong they suggested summer before they even finalised a product offering, generated enough interest to JV with ORSoC, held an open day and opened for sales.

At the point they held an open day and most importantly opened for sales September was on the cards, and uploading a working unit well beyond the promised specs 45 mins before October began was quite the coup de grâce. I was there in person they really did get their shit together in just over 24 hours, and that's a hard act to follow.

When I first contacted them I stated exactly this; "this is a burnt community, make sure you under promise and over deliver." The whole margins thing to shy on the side of what was achievable was always in the cards, they knew precisely what they were doing, as such people are happy.

Perhaps this only a small community in the grand scheme of things and fresh newbie blood exists frequently enough outside the forum to sustain poor business practice, but this has always been the home of Bitcoin and a tarnished rep here will carry fourth...in essence you reap what you sow.

I have no beef with you Josh but you're talking whack above, and you know it.

So, you're saying KNC was lying then?  Please explain this quote if I am wrong:

We are Swedish miners that are producing our own ASIC miners to strengthen the market and avoid monopoly.
Our company kncminer is pleased to announce the opening of a brand new web shop dedicated to the online sale of Bitcoin hardware to the international community, www.kncminer.com.

We will in the upcoming weeks opening our order book to allow the purchase of our first set of ASIC miners. They are in the early stages of development now and will be ready in the summer of 2013 (yes in just a few months)

Let me guess... KNC didn't really post that, right?  Someone else posing as KNC did?

You're the only one talking whack here, my friend, sorry.



Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: CYPER on December 24, 2013, 09:14:39 PM

We are Swedish miners that are producing our own ASIC miners to strengthen the market and avoid monopoly.
Our company kncminer is pleased to announce the opening of a brand new web shop dedicated to the online sale of Bitcoin hardware to the international community, www.kncminer.com.

We will in the upcoming weeks opening our order book to allow the purchase of our first set of ASIC miners. They are in the early stages of development now and will be ready in the summer of 2013 (yes in just a few months)

Let me guess... KNC didn't really post that, right?  Someone else posing as KNC did?

You're the only one talking whack here, my friend, sorry.



How can you be so stupid and be still alive?

KNC was 2 months away from taking any orders/customers' money when this statement was made.
It is even mentioned there in the text you just copied.


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: CYPER on December 24, 2013, 09:23:04 PM

We are Swedish miners that are producing our own ASIC miners to strengthen the market and avoid monopoly.
Our company kncminer is pleased to announce the opening of a brand new web shop dedicated to the online sale of Bitcoin hardware to the international community, www.kncminer.com.

We will in the upcoming weeks opening our order book to allow the purchase of our first set of ASIC miners. They are in the early stages of development now and will be ready in the summer of 2013 (yes in just a few months)

Let me guess... KNC didn't really post that, right?  Someone else posing as KNC did?

You're the only one talking whack here, my friend, sorry.



How can you be so stupid and be still alive?

KNC was 2 months away from taking any orders/customers' money when this statement was made.

CYPER, you are living proof that a brain dead, drooling moron without a single coherent thought available for anything beyond respiration is capable of posting here.  Compared to you, roadkill is Stephen Hawking.



I am not the one making a stupid claim, like: "KNC were months late" and then backing it up with a proof that contain a contradiction within itself.


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: Syke on December 24, 2013, 09:37:00 PM
No, you're just babbling incoherently like an idiot.

Classic. When you're losing the argument, resort to insults.


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: CYPER on December 24, 2013, 09:40:12 PM
No, you're just babbling incoherently like an idiot.

Classic. When you're losing the argument, resort to insults.

I can't say I am surprised. After all he is a cheat and a crook.


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: cedivad on December 24, 2013, 09:40:30 PM
Classic. When you're losing the argument, resort to insults.
The problem with those stupid techniques is that they only work for a limited time on a limited population. Ice simply gave up. You should evolve as well, josh.


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: CYPER on December 24, 2013, 09:43:38 PM
Classic. When you're losing the argument, resort to insults.
The problem with those stupid techniques is that they only work for a limited time on a limited population. Ice simply gave up. You should evolve as well, josh.

Unfortunately evolution takes time. You can't expect a dancing money to turn into an intelligent human being overnight.


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: Bitcoinorama on December 24, 2013, 09:48:12 PM


So, you're saying KNC was lying then?  Please explain this quote if I am wrong:

We are Swedish miners that are producing our own ASIC miners to strengthen the market and avoid monopoly.
Our company kncminer is pleased to announce the opening of a brand new web shop dedicated to the online sale of Bitcoin hardware to the international community, www.kncminer.com.

We will in the upcoming weeks opening our order book to allow the purchase of our first set of ASIC miners. They are in the early stages of development now and will be ready in the summer of 2013 (yes in just a few months)

Let me guess... KNC didn't really post that, right?  Someone else posing as KNC did?

You're the only one talking whack here, my friend, sorry.



I'm nobody's fool, so quit trying this crap with me, i'm certainly not taking you for one.

The quote you keep throwing around was from Andreas's very first post in the forum. They hadn't finalised anything at that point. Originally they wanted to make an approx $5k machine where upon the first 500 paid x amount up front, and then the rest at a later date, and then a following 500 would pay at the later date.

They were putting the feelers out to see if 1,000 would bite, at which point they could work with a reputable ASIC design consultancy - ORSoC they had spoken to and poss hit the funding target required with a viable amount of numbers. They knew a figure of approx $5m was required to breakeven and fund NRE for silicon, components, manufacturing, labour, etc..

ORSoC had already worked with high frequency trading platforms and had followed Bitcoin with interest, but any idea lacking any substantial volume of potential interest to cover base costs, no dice.

Marcus (ORSoC) had already said screw the original idea if you want to do this you need to aim for 28nm straight away, as it's only a matter before someone else competent will. Mars was only ever a proof of concept, but they aimed to sell it at one point with a summer delivery, although again that had nothing to do with the original summer quote. Mars became surplus to requirement build wise and would have only have slowed the main project down. Jupiter was first suggested as a 250 Gh/s unit, then 350, then 400, before arriving at 550. Real engineers state targets they know they can reach, not best case simulations as other factors come into play w.r.t. to power and heat, only when something of statistical significance suggest otherwise can you with a degree of confidence claim otherwise. Optimistic BS that the crowd want to hear  is marketing, not engineering.

The Summer delivery date was never factored at the point of sale when the order book was opened. That's the crucial difference.

Entering a thread putting the feelers out to gauge a reaction to a hypothetical intention is no committal. When you take money and lay the deal out is what matters, both in terms of integrity and legality.

Claiming you will deliver a 600gh/s PCI-E based 28nm using a fab with known yield issues at 28 in December whilst taking payment was a contract, not a hypothetical statement to generate interest. There's a difference, and it's December btw...




Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: Tehfiend on December 24, 2013, 09:49:59 PM
ITT: A case study on cognitive dissonance provided by subject Josh "2 more weeks" Zerlan

I feel kind of bad for the guy now. I just imagine him sitting at his computer on Christmas Eve desperately typing out these insults trying to hold onto his delusion that BFL has not been an absolute failure and borderline scam. KNC's ability to bring a 28NM ASIC miner to market in one quarter must really be giving him a cognitive dissonance flare up...



Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: RoadStress on December 24, 2013, 09:56:30 PM
I'm nobody's fool, so quit trying this crap with me, i'm certainly not taking you for one.



Don't feed tard trolls please!


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: Syke on December 24, 2013, 09:57:35 PM
Claiming you will deliver a 600gh/s PCI-E based 28nm using a fab with known yield issues at 28 in December whilst taking payment was a contract, not a hypothetical statement to generate interest. There's a difference, and it's December btw...

They're still selling product based on Nov/Dec for shipping.

http://www.butterflylabs.com/monarch/

Quote
November / December    Initial Shipping


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: stan258 on December 24, 2013, 10:57:31 PM
You and the trolls like you are the explicit example of who's fault it is.
Hey josh, how are you doing? Have you tried to install the blockchain app on your android yet? Do you still need lessons?


Lol.


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: dbasql on December 24, 2013, 11:19:44 PM
ITT: A case study on cognitive dissonance provided by subject Josh "2 more weeks" Zerlan

I feel kind of bad for the guy now. I just imagine him sitting at his computer on Christmas Eve desperately typing out these insults trying to hold onto his delusion that BFL has not been an absolute failure and a borderline scam. KNC's ability to bring a 28NM ASIC miner to market in one quarter must really be giving him a cognitive dissonance flare up...



Fixed but well put


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: Vagnavs on December 24, 2013, 11:31:15 PM


No, you're just babbling incoherently like an idiot.


Please just leave the bitcoins community alone. You've got to be the most hated person in the bitcoins world. Why you post is beyond me..


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: perezoso on December 25, 2013, 12:03:51 AM
Pass the popcorn and Merry Christmas, fellas!


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: jspielberg on December 25, 2013, 12:10:14 AM
This thread is way more interesting than the hash fast thread.

Now if only they would post some information somewhere.  Their website... Twitter... The forum... Sky writing...  Telepathy... Whatever... I'm not particular.

Any clairvoyants on the boards?


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: Syke on December 25, 2013, 12:10:55 AM
Seriously... I've got to imagine it's the most desperate and/or pathetic that still somehow thinks Bitcointalk is the nexus of the bitcoin universe?  What an insular world you must live in heh...  When are you going to realize that Bitcointalk is irrelevant to the bitcoin world?

Let's see you put your money where your mouth is:

7 @ 1.25

$5700 per week on advertising on this forum. Clearly you don't really believe Bitcointalk is irrelevant, or you wouldn't be dumping that kind of money into it.


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: Xian01 on December 25, 2013, 12:11:31 AM
Oh noes!  I'm the most hated guy in a sewer!  It's going to keep me awake at night!
Seriously... I've got to imagine it's the most desperate and/or pathetic that still somehow thinks Bitcointalk is the nexus of the bitcoin universe?  What an insular world you must live in heh...  When are you going to realize that Bitcointalk is irrelevant to the bitcoin world?  It could disappear today and it wouldn't make a hill of beans difference to anyone important.  The only people hanging around and taking this forum seriously are the trolls.

 Why do you keep spending time and money to advertise on such an irrelevant forum that you regard so poorly ?


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: madmax_ger on December 25, 2013, 12:15:10 AM
Josh is probably taking a % of HF profits due to it's suggestions to john. So there is really no point in asking him it's opinion on HF. I will always remember how sure he was that KNC was gonna be late when we meet, it must have been because he knew that KNC was legit.

And I was right... KNC was late.  They promised summer delivery and didn't deliver until, what... October?



KNC promised summer delivery on there FPGA protot ype of like 80gh or some such..FPGA unit ...forget the name......the btc community said it was too small too high priced..so they changed it to their proof of concept prototype...and did not deliver that in the summer they delivered their orig ASIC as they stated on time org 250gh was the estimated gh....always stated that for the fall ie sept  (or 1 week late for some folk)....so no the ASIC 400gh stated at the end became current ad  (which they gave us the other 550 gh for free mine does 555gh) was on time +/- a week....so don't spread false info.....ASIC we are talking here.


Does it hurt to be so wrong all the time?


My Jala ordered@7ghs is running at > 50% error rate with 6 ghs and your support tells me to send it back at my costs (germany - usa) to get it repaired, knowing that my shipping costs will just make things even worse.

When I ordered you said new orders will be shipped in 2 months. After 6 months you shipped mine, finally. No need to say anything more.

Compare that to KNC.


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: Syke on December 25, 2013, 12:48:52 AM
My Jala ordered@7ghs is running at > 50% error rate with 6 ghs and your support tells me to send it back at my costs (germany - usa) to get it repaired, knowing that my shipping costs will just make things even worse.

When I ordered you said new orders will be shipped in 2 months. After 6 months you shipped mine, finally. No need to say anything more.

And since you haven't returned it for RMA, you're what Josh considers "a happy customer". BFL has *a lot* of "happy customers".


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: iCEBREAKER on December 25, 2013, 03:10:32 AM
When are you going to realize that Bitcointalk is irrelevant to the bitcoin world?  It could disappear today and it wouldn't make a hill of beans difference to anyone important.  The only people hanging around and taking this forum seriously are the trolls.

I disagree, but unfortunately must admit when moderators like Gmaxwell refuse to enforce their own rules, then start violating them, it ruins the old, information-based approach to the Custom Hardware sub.

Thanks to Gmaxwell's butthurt and resulting shitty moderation, the HashFast thread now looks like the Activemining trainwreck.

A tiny but loud minority of disgruntled customers (cedivad, perezozo, gmaxwell, and a couple others) have been allowed to ruin a thread that served to provide information for hundreds of actual and thousands of potential HashFast customers.

Just as the Activemining trainwreck reflects poorly on the board and community as a whole, Gmaxwell's intentionally trashed HashFast thread serves as a beacon, to warn those interested in facts and logic away to seek greener pastures.

Gmaxwell's sub rules say 'don't make a ton of duplicate theads' but instead of deleting off-topic trolling/derailment/harassment, he promotes such rubbishy noise to independent threads.

Source: this thread.  And more.

How does hurting Hashfast customers (by allowing their thread to be ruined) in any way achive Gmaxwell's goal of punishing HashFast the company?

It doesn't.  But he doesn't care, as he is too emotionally invested in harming HashFast in any way possible.  Like a bitter ex-wife.   :D


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: ASIC-K on December 25, 2013, 03:45:45 AM
When are you going to realize that Bitcointalk is irrelevant to the bitcoin world?  It could disappear today and it wouldn't make a hill of beans difference to anyone important.  The only people hanging around and taking this forum seriously are the trolls.

I disagree, but unfortunately must admit when moderators like Gmaxwell refuse to enforce their own rules, then start violating them, it ruins the old, information-based approach to the Custom Hardware sub.

Thanks to Gmaxwell's butthurt and resulting shitty moderation, the HashFast thread now looks like the Activemining trainwreck.

A tiny but loud minority of disgruntled customers (cedivad, perezozo, gmaxwell, and a couple others) have been allowed to ruin a thread that served to provide information for hundreds of actual and thousands of potential HashFast customers.

Just as the Activemining trainwreck reflects poorly on the board and community as a whole, Gmaxwell's intentionally trashed HashFast thread serves as a beacon, to warn those interested in facts and logic away to seek greener pastures.

Gmaxwell's sub rules say 'don't make a ton of duplicate theads' but instead of deleting off-topic trolling/derailment/harassment, he promotes such rubbishy noise to independent threads.

Source: this thread.  And more.

How does hurting Hashfast customers (by allowing their thread to be ruined) in any way achive Gmaxwell's goal of punishing HashFast the company?

It doesn't.  But he doesn't care, as he is too emotionally invested in harming HashFast in any way possible.  Like a bitter ex-wife.   :D

nobody cares about hashfast, they are shit.


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: jspielberg on December 25, 2013, 03:52:49 AM
Ice -
I don't consider myself a bitter customer yet, but we are totally flying blind.  They are supposedly close to delivering, but they clearly aren't following the game plan most of the successful asic deployments have followed.

Hashfast hasn't updated their twitter feed and seems to not monitor this forum except with the community liaison who seems to have any more information than we do, and doesn't have the authority to answer any questions.

Just out of curiosity what do expect HF customers to be doing?


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: gmaxwell on December 25, 2013, 03:58:26 AM
Just as the Activemining trainwreck reflects poorly on the board and community as a whole, Gmaxwell's intentionally trashed HashFast thread serves as a beacon, to warn those interested in facts and logic away to seek greener pastures.
What the hell are you talking about?

I removed pages of people complaining about _other_ companies to another thread precisely to allow hashfast customers to continue to discuss their predicament (though— not with much progress sadly, considering the lack of information from hashfast itself).

It's not a promotion, it's removal of offtopic stuff, and I even received PM thanks for it from some of the other hashfast customers who have silently been trying to follow the thread... The subject matter was still generally on-topic for the subforum and clearly touched on some things that some people felt the need to vent about.

Quote
in any way achive Gmaxwell's goal of punishing HashFast the company?
I can assure you that were I intending to punish the HashFast company it would be via mechanisms more effective then helping other hashfast customers continue to discuss how screwed they are without the thread being made unreadable by agent provocateurs or whatever the hell trolling rubbish goes on around here.

Wherever did you get these ideas in any case? "But he doesn't care, as he is too emotionally invested in harming HashFast in any way possible" —  ???  do you also think that obama personally listens in on you when you shower?


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: iCEBREAKER on December 25, 2013, 05:56:01 AM
What the hell are you talking about? 

do you also think that obama personally listens in on you when you shower?

Obama and The Wookie not only listen in but also film my sexy bod during shower-time.  That's fine, because everyone knows you waive your Constitutional rights when you use water, just like when you leave your house (waterways and roads are Constitution-free zones under Federal jurisdiction, just as George Washington intended.)

Yes, you have belatedly seen fit to somewhat moderate, instead of blatantly encouraging lulzy chaos and disinformation within, the HashFast thread.  A Christmas miracle!  Huzzah!   :D

What I am "talking about" is the unfortunate resemblance between the utterly useless Activemining thread and increasingly useless HashFast thread. 

Both represent a failure of moderation.

Unfortunately, the supposed rules against repetitive posting, +1s, trolling, etc. are still selectively enforced.

You let posters get away with many things on the HashFast thread you actively disallow on the Cointerra thread.  That's hypocrisy.


How much absurd speculation and FUD about 'shipping empty boxes,' 'is iCEBREAKER actually Eduardo,' and the like must we be subjected to before you lift a finger?

How many times do we really need to hear cedivad kvetch about refunds and crow about his lawsuit?   :P

"zomg I'm so suing HashFast"
"zomg HashFast is so sued"
"have I mentioned my sure-fire lawsuit against hashfast in the last five minutes?"

And now you join in, hoping to zoom-and-enhance the deleted board assembly video for some key bit of Perry Mason worthy clincher?

That's pathetic.  And unbecoming conduct for an industry-savvy moderator guy who knows better.   ;)


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: amer on December 25, 2013, 06:46:48 AM
I don't see how the responsibility of the HashFast threads getting derailed is a moderator's fault or a customer's fault.

People are asking questions and getting ignored. HashFast_CL is posting to the thread and repeatedly not answering the question. What the hell is expected is going to happen next? People are going to try to guess and then disagree and then get into pages of arguments having nothing to do with "custom hardware" and everything to do with "what is the answer to this question that HashFast was talking about 1 month ago, but has never spoken of again."

We see people ask about the refund policy, which HashFast described back when they wanted money. Now, when asked for clarification, no answer.

We see people ask about the MPP timing - when will we get it, HashFast sold MPP at sale time, revisited it to acknowledge it began retroactively in October, but then absolutely no answer. So, they were talking about it and then abruptly stopped.

TBH, I wish the thread would be less of the bickering and just contained actual answers from HashFast on their intentions, as well as they know it, even if to say they don't know, but they are thinking about it.

This is a pretty apt comment:
The signal to noise ratio here is astounding >:(

But wtf - there is an argument about how obnoxious the noise is? It doesn't matter what the content of the noise is when there is very little signal. HashFast doesn't have its own forums and stopped posting to its own blog. I get that they're busy building the product and are panicked because it's behind schedule, and I understand that - but then to step in and join the argument about the size and shape of the noise when they are the ONLY credible source of signal? If the company itself is not willing to provide signal, who is supposed to do that?


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: Unacceptable on December 25, 2013, 07:20:43 AM
Like Josh @ BFL says,"buy our product & trust us,we'll get it to you when WE'RE ready.........we NEVER promised you ROI or a profit..............."

This preorder crap is getting crazy..........if they're late,SAY SO!!!!!!!!!!!

If it's going to be overpowered,SAY SO!!!!!!!!!!

What the hell is wrong with good ole COMMUNICATION................is it outdated ???  Am I "behind the times already" ???




Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: gmaxwell on December 25, 2013, 08:07:33 AM
You let posters get away with many things on the HashFast thread you actively disallow on the Cointerra thread.  That's hypocrisy.[/size]
There aren't any irritated CoinTerra customers, not a single one— as far as I can tell, and I even asked. CoinTerra has, apparently, made right by their customers— at least for now.

The only thing I disallowed there was your all caps red bolded whatever-the-heck-that-was and people bringing other vendors into the discussion (which was, the same thing I did in the HF threads).

Quote
How much absurd speculation and FUD about 'shipping empty boxes,' 'is iCEBREAKER actually Eduardo,' and the like must we be subjected to before you lift a finger?

Okay, so who are you then? There is no mystery who I am. I think some transparency might resolve some of your complaints far better than what appears your preferred direction— of silencing anyone who is concerned, afraid, or angry from expressing their irritation or uncertainty.


Title: Re: HashFast thread derailment part 3
Post by: eiliant on December 25, 2013, 09:53:36 AM
Oh noes!  I'm the most hated guy in a sewer!  It's going to keep me awake at night!

Seriously... I've got to imagine it's the most desperate and/or pathetic that still somehow thinks Bitcointalk is the nexus of the bitcoin universe?  What an insular world you must live in heh...  When are you going to realize that Bitcointalk is irrelevant to the bitcoin world?  It could disappear today and it wouldn't make a hill of beans difference to anyone important.  The only people hanging around and taking this forum seriously are the trolls.



Try replying to the KNC post above. Can you? I have to assure you most people bought when they claimed September shipping, and they were late, but by a few days, with hundreds of GH/s increase.

Where is the Monarch?