Bitcoin Forum

I cannot imagine promoting a project for months and at the end, all you can get is a meager amount of tokens. Yes, there are legit projects in the crypto space, but not all legit project worth participating in.
Why am i saying this?
There are projects that only allocate just 1% of the total sale made to bounty hunters.
My concern now is, does it worth devoting one's time to a project that will be only pay you token worth less than $100 after months of participation?

Most of the time, if the proportion of the bounty thread is not high, then the participants will not be particularly large.
So you can distribute as many tokens as you can.

It is not bad to join bounty campaign with low allocations at least it is legit and only have a limit in participants.

first of all let's be honest with ourselves when we say how much work bounty is. It's not. I'm also joining bounty campaigns now and then, but it takes me max 10 minutes each day to get the work done. If you worked for fiat that much, how much would you get paid?

Of course this is a serious problem. But before you participate in bounty, you must first look at the allocation given for bounty. If you think that allocation is enough, it is better to participate. All of that goes back to someone who wants to participate in bounty. Indeed bounty allocations vary each campaign. So choose to join or not.

it's legitimately there is a side-chapel in the participants as well as the possibility of more income I'm just such and looking for a bounty

If the time taken up to more than 1 month and only worth $ 100, that's too little in my opinion. You should consider how much you will earn, before you join a bounty, so do not regret later. There are so many bounties you can choose, so do not despair, you just have to choose the one you want.

If I really believed that the project will become succesful in future and can be useful by their users one day then less allocated budget is not an issue to me. Being rewarded with less amount after ICO didn't trouble me much if the project is good because I am participating bounty not to sell after ICO but to increase my investment for future.

I think that is all right to get those 100 bucks rather than getting nothing in the hands. Now a bounty hunter would be person who will participate in more than 100;s of the ICO in a month and thus if even 50 of them turn out to be green one and pay you 100 bucks each then you end up earning at least 5K USD after months of work. So it doesn't matter how much they are paying and depending upon that you should be paying attention to it or not. But its all about how much time you can devote by yourself to make nice fortune from scratch. At least thats some money, many time people dont even get pennies in their hands.

As for me, bounty campaign became no profitable at all. May be because of a large number of participants,,

For example, the bounty will continue 2 months and at the end, you will gain 100 $. How much time do you spend to complete a week? Just 20 or 30 minutes for a weekly report. Then this means that you spend only 2 hours in 2 months . This is not a much time. And you have possiblity earn more than 100$.

Yes. That is absolutely true. It is not worth to participate if they allocate a small amount for bounty hunters. Normally i do consider to participate only for large allocations for bounty campaigns. Further most of the bounty campaigns they allocates high percentage for Signature campaigns and Blog campaigns. I always try to do blog articles to receive highest rewards.

Since the number of participants in the Bounty is pretty much, so the bonus distributed to everyone will be lower. Over the next few years the number of participants will increase, so we will receive a small bonus.

Don't participate in bounties that have low allocations, if you do so then you are just setting yourself up for disappointment when the rewards are finally paid out because you would not be getting a lot out of the bounty. If you want to make a good amount of money from bounties then you should always participate in the ones that have a high percentage of allocation for bounties

I sincerely think that for a bounty hunter to make the most out of a signature bounty for example, there needs to be limits set, number of participants can be set too while the criteria for entry and participation set very high as well. This will certainly make it worthwhile.

You're absolutely right my friend. I look at the percentage of bounty allocation and that determines to a very large extent if I'll participate in it or not. I have control participation but I don't have control over what number of tokens I get in the end.

Actually it's quite normal when a project allocates about 1-2% all its hardcap for bounty. If you see numbers like 5-10% then most likely they set such high amont only to attact participants and then they'll most likely change the amount in the end.

It is very important to look for allocation and if there is an existing spreadsheet so you can look how many stakes are for a particular campaign and how many are participating, then decide for yourself if it is worth joining in this campaign, of course checking if the campaign is legit is the first thing you should do.

Of course its not worth to join such  bounty because of the amount allocate to the bounty hunters. 1% that's ridiculous low, and that 1% allocation is still divided amongst different bounty such as signature campaign, facebook and twitter campaigns, blogs content and Youtube videos.

I would not join such bounties because all your effort is not worth for even a week, much less a bounty campaign that will last for weeks with minimal payouts. Not worth it mate.

If you look at the signature bounties, then I have to say that the average reward ranges anywhere from $0 to $5,000 (or even more if you are extremely lucky). If the ICO is a very good one, then even a 1% allocation can bring you a decent amount of funds. On the other hand, if the ICO fails, then all your time and effort will be wasted.

If you receive your token, you should be happy even if you do not have a lot of money. Because there are many bonus campaigns that do not distribute the token to the participants. They have scam us. So do not complain and work hard.

Participation in bounty is a kind of lottery, only in this case you invest your time. But in any case, you have the opportunity to minimize the risks of running into scammers through analysis, so if you want to earn more, you need to work harder for this. Participation in bounty is not as easy as it might seem at the beginning.

If the project is good enough, then that one percentage is enough. But you just have to wait for the tokens to raise their price at the market. This almost never happens right after being listed on the stock exchanges.  :)

ICOs are business, like other businesses, ICOs have consequence to be failed or at least bad outcome. this also becomes a consequence for the participants. rewards allocations are not the main thing to consider the ICOs are worth to participate. the main things are the management (rules) of bounties (those shows bounties handled well or not), the ideas of ICOs, the master plans, and the roadmaps.

How did you say that it was a scam? I think you look at the ICO price of the token you'd got then you calculate it but the price was too low that's why the token you got from dollar was too cheap than you expect.

Here is the thing...

1st if it is a project that is worth it and base on what you said devoting youself for a month and payment is 100 USD or Less it no you say and go "bye" or do not there to join at all

2nd If it is not worth it same as the first and your payment is 100 USD and bellow it is still a big no NO.

If hunting for bounty look at official website look at every details and the team biodate if it says anything about the project it is okay and if not it is not.

If I think that the project is promising and have the possibility of success in the future then I will not think twice to join even the allocated budget is low. If you are a kind of bounty hunter that once reward token receive then sell immediately I am sure you will not agree with me. Having a reward token with low price after ICO is not a big deal to me as long as I believed that in future time this small value now will give me a huge profit in future time.

Then join only bounty campaigns that allocate big rewards but even if you get high rewards in other campaigns. It does not mean that we can get big rewards in terms of usd because there are good bounty but failed to perform in market. Sometimes some small allocation bounties can perform well in the market. Sometimes holding our reward is good too especially if they have a good team.

Well good for you to receive that tokens as we all know some of the ICO dont really give the rewards as they say that the project crowd's fund raise will be compromise. 100 USD is already good if you compare to those ICO who will not give the rewards. So better be thankful that you receive a reward than nothing. If i were you i could still be thankful for them that they are really sincere in giving of the rewards.

1% is more than enough in case of various projects. And more to say - with the quality of the content/messages which good part of bounty hunters produce - that's even too much :) Of course, it's cool when project allocates 2-5% to community, but that's becoming a rare thing also because of the content hunters produce.

I think each person should decide for himself how much energy and efforts he is ready to put in and how much money he  wants to get for that efforts. When a bounty campaigne has low percentage of allocations, it  can mean that this ICO is legit and that you will get paid but unfortunately rather small amount of money. If you want to gain large profit, then you have to take a risk and join campaignes that have big allocations for bounty but they that could be scams at the end. As they say nothing venture, nothing have.

When you do not have big experience but you have enough time, it is better to participate as much as you can even if you are not sure in good income in the end, as you get experience and education which also worth something.

you should be grateful to ICO. many people who have been helped by ICO, who initially only unemployed so can have income. yes, maybe if you just participate in social media campaign the result is not so big, but if you participate in the signature, content creator or translator, then the token in getting big too. you have to know, many in this forum that has been successful and rich from a bounty hunter.

Of course it is better to take part in very generous bounty campaigns with huge bounty pools but you just need to hold your low-cost rewards till they become high-cost.

but what if following a signature campaign, I think it will waste a lot of time and boring, my advice is more thorough to choose the right project, and be careful because at this time a lot of scam.

It all depends not so much on the percentage allocation on funds, but on how big the project is, how many funds were raised in the ICO and also the price of the tokens and supply of the total token amount. All these different variables are what make the bounty valuable or not. So do not just look at the percentage of allocated funds but look at how much the ico raised and what are token specifications for the bounty you are entering and also the percentages of allocated funds for each bounty job as well.

Its your prerogative to join or not,what seems to be the problem?do you want those project that promising you big amount of bounties but before the project end,they will stop the campaign and pay you nothing?or those who give small amount but atleast they pay?remember that this community is not a work that you may feed family,this is to gain extra income aside from our real life work

Depends on participating list and your account, how cool it is. For example, if I have a legendary account I can participate in every campaign even in a low allocated campaign. But I will receive more than everyone else. So, depends on account quality and project hype project quality.

I strongly disagree with your opinion. 1% is enough to get a free token. even I thank ICO for giving me a job.
I follow the signature and blog campaign, the fee can be more than $100/ project. maybe you just follow the social media campaign, so just get less than $100

I am not interested to join in low allocation bounty programs. My time has value, I am not only worked for money but also I need to be satisfied when I work. Recently, I have seen some bounty campaigns managed by the amazix team, only 100K$ total bounty budget for 3 months! Are you kidding me? though  I am doing a signature bounty campaign managed by the amazix team.

Then don't participate in their bounty campaign most of the bounties will discuss or explain the allocation for the participants whether it is the 1% of the total amount sold on the token sale or it is fixed, how much would be that 1% because if they are going to raise $10M given that the project is legitimate then $100,000 would be allocated for the participants plus a chance to be an early adopters to the coin if the project has the potential for the long-term holding, search for the right and legitimate bounties it is better to have that rather than to participate on a bounty who have an allocation of $1M then on the latter part they are just scam.

You will know how much would you get after participating in any bounty only after the ending of that bounty, it's almost unpredictable at the beginning of it. Besides, all bounties are like lottery - someone is luckier, someone doesn't

Yes you are right, sometimes we work till 2-3 months and when we get tokens its worth just 50-100$ so its not enough compare to our effort for that ICO. But this happens due to huge participants in that campaign and low bounty pool. So to avoid this , before joining any bounty you have to check bounty pool and participants limit . And if you interested to join REMME bounty campaign for signature, Reddit, Youtube, Steemit or LinkedIn, you can join this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3797294.0   As in this campain limited participants and there is no weekly stakes bu direct pays tokens . And the main think is its listed in CMC.

That is why as bounty hunters, we have to be smart on choosing a good bounty campaign to participate in. Besides, we are only investing time and effort in bounty campaigns. I've seen bounty campaigns like that and I must say, it clearly shows an unfair allocation for bounty participants so when I tried looking at the spreadsheets, I saw that there are only a few members that joined and most of them are Jr.members.

Well the allocation is always indicated in the bounty campaign thread. It is your choice if you want to participate to that or no? It is your choice, but still some low allocation bounty ended up successful and still get a decent amount of reward for work.

Participation in the bounty is always responsibility, do not forget about it, because now a lot of people are taking part in the bounty and I think that all this will be very easy but all the same it's not as easy as you think.

Actually I also follow a lot of bounty with a fairly low allocation, but if the project really offers a good concept I am sure with what will happen in their future. They may change the rules related to the addition of the allocation of funds to bounty when bounty is in progress, but not many projects implement this kind of thing.

in my opinion, it does not really matter. if the project has low allocation but it's only followed by a few participants and it turns out the project is successful it would be a big profit for the bounty hunter. the most important as a bounty hunter is we must maximize the promotion to get great results in the future.

Hmm! This is a topic which requires  enough attention, I must confess, i’ve Participated in several campaign which I would say base on the rank of my account then, I can’t participate in signature campaigns. One of the challenges we are facing through this is the population of participants and the low count allocation by the team

Sometimes its good though if there are less participants but low allocations in a good project and known platform. Income will be suck and i think no bounty hunter will join in their project.

We cannot totally blame the team for allocating a low percentage to bounty campaigns, this has always been the usual rate but participation campaign has received a large turn out this days such that what an individual get before on bounty participation is what 10 or more people share nowadays. We can only employ upcoming ICO teams to increase the percentage of allocation taking into consideration the larger number of bounty participants.

Those low allocation bounties is worthless for me since, you're putting hardwork overall with all the time you have to support the project. It's more like you're in a physical job, the efforts was not paid and yet after the work done you'll be getting small rewards. If this altcoin system would want to aim great results for their project they should have to pay enough tokens to those who participated the ico, so that in the long run it will have good results in trading activities once it become live on exchanges.

Well it depends on yourself, whether you think it's worth your time or not, the developers had the right to allocate how many percentage of the project for the bounty hunters, but if it's a good project then why not, think it as a long term investment, maybe in a month it worth 100$ but who knows in the next year it can become 1000$

Is apart of bounty hunter experience sometimes you didn't expecting about the low stakes allocation of the project, and the hurting worse experience i can't received any reward from the bounty working for almost two months and the manager announce the project is pause wait for the new announcement about the payment until you can forget the payment because long time to wait.

I recommend next time you need to learn well the project to avoid scams or any kind of the strategy of dev's didn't paying to their participant promoting of the their project.

I would not say bounty is dead. But it has become much more competitive. With the sheer amount of hype, and participants. The reward is much2 less than last year. With the growth of cryptocurrency and the budget of the bounty is stagnant, that is why you fell like u're getting much2 less. With participants with legendary or similar ranks does not really feel it, but with Jr. Member / Members, the amount is getting much smaller. I would suggest to avoid doing bounty full time if u have a low ranking account.

In my opinion we are actually choosing projects that we think are good. Even before joining the project we will see from the participants. If participants are many, it's better not to go. It will definitely get a little let alone a little tokennya allocation and the price is cheap.

Of curse no one likes to work month after month and in the end to get very small reward for the effort. I am trying to avoid projects like that,but form time ti time I get into one.

Most of the time, if the proportion of the bounty thread is not high, then the participants will not be particularly large.
So you can distribute as many tokens as you can. signature bounty is the biggest stake. You can find the fair share of bounty so you will make profit form bounty jobs. It is also be careful to scam bounty.

it does not really matter whether the bounty has a large reward allocated or not because if that will scam you  that  doesnt still make sense at all. I think it is better to join a small bounty  but legit than a too good to be true bounty with unsure payment.



As what ive said above earlier , it is better to work with a small reward but with a sure payout than a high reward  bounty that can potentially scam you. And also almost all the bounty ico campaigns were always running for a month or two. if you are just lazy to work and wait for a longer time then much better if you can just quit joining on them.

Of course, it is not humane in my opinion. Not worth the energy, thoughts, and time that we use to promote the project. It means not respecting someone. My advice should you avoid bounty with low token allocation. Yeah, we can give value to our own effort. If it is not profitable for you, then it should not be followed.

For me it is okay to participate any bounty campaigns with low allocation the important is they are legit and the token will really distribute cause many bounties are not paying after finishing the ico. Its okay to received token even just a little amount than an bounty that promises a huge amount of token and then after the end of the day no token will distribute.

I think before you participate in a certain bounty you need to be equipped with the informations about the project, their rules and regulations and of course how much will be allocated for the participants. But, you cannot be assured as to the success of the project. So, in effect there are times that the payment may sometimes be lower than you expected.

It is a very big challenge to the crypto world, which is why you need to look into every project and figure out the prospects to be sure about how successful the project would be.
Also, you need to grow up your facebook and twitter followers, to aid your stakes, and similarly you also have to ensure to follow rules of bounties as they help in earning alot of stakes and definitely alot of money too.

Just don't give up. be steadfast and remain calm
Goodluck.

Participating in low allocations is not bad if the participants will be less also

I would go for a good bounty with 1% allocation, rather than a bad bounty with 5% allocation. Because in the latter case, there is a very good chance that the token reward that you get in the end may be worthless.

It is really up to you when you continue making advertisement to the ICO bounty campaign that you are joining. It is much possible that many users or bounty hunters join in that ICO when that ICO you are joining with is a popular one. You can easily calculate the total allocated tokens and divide it to how much users, if you feel that it is too much low, you can leave and find another bounty that has a lot more bigger token allocation.

If we know fo sure that we'll just get less than $100 after months of participation in the bounty campaign.
I think we better not joining the campaign, that is not match with the effort we've done for the project.

probably because the bounty hunter has a lot of membership so the allocation of token to be slightly divided according to what he got, it is very disappointing of course has been promoting for several months but the results obtained do not match the expectations, but it is better than the scam project and do not pay more painful

But most of the bounties are having decent allocations which can cover all the campaigns available at their promotion scheme but if it is a good project then most of the participants will participate in that which may decrease the bounty rewards because bounties paying the participants at stake based calculation.So we also have to be aware that how much larticipants are there in that campaign .If more participants are there then better to move to another good project and you will get the stakes for your completed weeks even if you leave that project.

It's still worth devoting time and effort participating on bounties like signature campiagns if it is a promising one. I started with the signature campaign of DeepOnion and got more than 5k$ worth of Onions in 4 months. Now I am participating in Twist project hoping it would be as rewarding as the previous one.

Most bounty allocations are good enough but sometimes there is a little bias between social media,signature,and content creation bounties.Most bounties have a very small allocations for social media but I think social media carries the message of the bounty very far so personally I think social media bounty allocations should be more significant.

The reward for a project is so much that you can add up to a significant amount of income. You think I'm right?

Yes, I see some projects with token distributions in bounty campaigns are lower than other campaigns.
Each bounty campaign has a way of distributing rewards to people participating in their bounty marketing team. Typically, it is agreed between the project manager and the bounty manager. As a bonus participant, You have the right to choose campaigns with better rewards. Or not necessarily a bigger reward when the project is successful.

Participating in bounties with low allocation doesn't worth it, the more reason you should be participating in signature bounty. Bounty managers cherish signature bounty more than media thereby allocating larger percentage of the token to signature.

There is still possbile you'll get big a amount of pool of bounty / rewards. Where people like hunt or looking some big allocations. When ppl looking another bounties, so you can join a project where have good potential even small of allocation. Im trying to poin out you can take some an oppotunies at bounty (when ppl looking for other).

Now many bounty projects are like this and it is impossible to avoid! The situation you are talking about is not bad. There are many projects you have been doing for a long time, but it is closed down directly. No rewards are distributed. It makes people feel angry! Very helpless! Before I did a project for 13 cycles, the project was closed directly, and I didn't get any rewards. It made me very distressed!

Initially, when choosing a bounty project, you need to look at many things.It is clear that if the project is not interesting then Hard Cap they will not collect.and accordingly, you get a little for their work.So do not despair and start looking for promising projects.

If the achievement of great success is probably 1% is also the results fairly. However, it is sometimes not very well-liked and prefers high. Perhaps the only opportunity joins the indeed participants a little so he would be able to get the allocation alone.

Some projects assigned to the 1% of total sales of a bounty hunter, I think it's a bounty of normal distribution, if the project good enough, you just need to wait for the token to raise prices in the market.

In joining bounties we are the one who choose if we want to join or not, of course we will read first all the details in their platform and we are the one who makes decision for that so whatever amount we gather from that project we should be thankful.

Honestly in my experience,it's dose'nt matter if budget allocation are minimal 1%or less than one hundred us dollars atlest it's legitimate and  make sure that will pay immediately once ICO project will be end ,, and not scam, cause some bounty campaign  despite have a big   budget allocation for bounty hunter, but at the end, it will be
scam or otherwise it will be manipulated of some greedy person involved behind of this project,,or will not be  honest according to their pledge after ICO will be end,,,on other
hand ,experiencee of this situation is not only you,cause even  other people can do the desame.

the small allocation if participants little certainly not be a problem. but I think just a little bit like that. However, that has often left a bit allocation and choose a larger allocation. of course, it hopes part received will also be big and that's been the goal of many people.

There are two types of bounty humters, the first bounty hunter absolutely wants to earn money they are doing all their best to earn money because it is a human needs. They participating in some bounty campaigns even it was have a low boumty pool allocation because all of them money is important.

The other one! there are bounty hunters that not only money arw they want, they want to earn and at the same time they want also tp learn no matter what was the allocation of a particular bounty campaigns allocated. They wants both of earning and learning because thy know that not only money is important in our life but also learning is a best weapon to survive in this world.

When finidng the bounties with the low allocations, actually we have realized them at first. On the bounty thread, commmonly there have been stated that the allocation will be this amount. We must learn how to calculate the real money that probably you get from the allocation. We must also consider how many participants joining that bounty. Small allocation for small bounty participants may be also worthed. If it is small, it is better to search for the other bounty.

of course it's always tempting to look for high wins.
but little of a good project is still better than many coins from a project that has no future  ;)

If your 1% allocation can be $ 100 or $ 50 it is still okay and imagine if you only get 7 coins for $ 1 then you can only $ 7. Within a month you participate as good as any price if you can just a little. no more than $ 50 then I say you fail in choosing bounty. It is quite disappointing but it does exist. Think of it as part of our process of choosing bounty.

there are worth and some aren't. if you can't stand it, you should be sticking to signature campaign that pays BTC.

i remember there were people complaining about how much token they get from the Chronobank TIME bounty which they have participated for months yet the token they got was less than 10 token. the price of the token is worth more than $8 each though but still most of them complain and not just that. claiming the token has made them complain more because the team needs an eth address that's new and never been used.

I think it worth participating in them, simply because you are almost not doing anything, spending around 20 mins a day, which is not a big deal.

agree, there are some campaign that has  high allocation but at the end, they didn’t meet their expectations so at the end, they will scam many participants as well as the investors.

Well for me, this is the matter of choosing the right one for us. Sometimes, bounty hunters prefer to choose high allocation rates. I myself depends on how good or solid the projects is but we cannot avoid getting lost  from failed projects that we think they will promise huge return or profit. Of course we need to make sure that our efforts as a bounty hunter woudn't be wasted so we need to make our own due diligence regarding choosing the best one.

Why you need to worry about it when you do the work and join the bounty is free. Plus, you have the right to choose the right campaign for you. I see some stretch bounty campaigns with shares for bonuses are very low. And in fact, these campaigns are not the least. I do not worry about it if it's a potential project or a really serious, legitimate project that focuses on the development of the project.

The stake 1-2% of all sold tokens is a normal allocation for the bounty of a reliable project. Also you need to give a heed to the quantity of a stakes within the bounty allocation. Some managers give a low chunk of all bounty budget for certain campaigns (social networks, etc). It depends only on their own decision. If you don't agree with the size of rewards, just do not participate in this bounty campaigns.

As much as possible, choose a campaign with a huge allocation for bounty campaign and less participants. You won't get big earnings if you settle on a low-budget bounty campaign especially now that not all of them set limit for participants. Some even reach 300 to 400 and that will give you a very small value in return.

It depends. If you write articles or make videos, it can take a long time to produce quality work. Also, it takes a while to write quality posts if you are in a signature campaign.

Joining a low allocation project sometimes making us doubtful about the end of the project.
But form a small bounty allocation could give us a big reward when the project success, and the participant of the bounty are small. It's good for us.

1% is actually normal. There are still some bounties that only give 1% of their token supply to be the rewards for all participants. However, it will depend on our way to join and the total supply of the tokens. If the total supply is big, 1% will be legit, too. However, it is true that not all bounties are legit. We cannot predict which one will be legit after the end of the ICO. For, the unpredictable participants may register in the last remaining days.

Lets say the project you participated in will run for two months for $100. Time you spent daily for your daily task is 10 minutes thus you will spent about 10 hrs to complete your daily task (10 x 2 months or 60 days is 10 hrs). $100 for 10 hrs of task is i think a reasonable amount.

Strongly depends on you, whether if you are okay with that price and with your accounts, or whatever you use to be a participant for such bounty.

Much depends on the rank in the subscription campaigns. In general, I think that it is worth looking for a bounty with a pool of at least 2 percent. Somebody say there are sometimes 3 percents, but I have not seen such campaigns..

As a matter of fact, I think this issue of participating in bounty programs for months and afterwards be given little tokens is becoming more rampant. I was a victim of that too sometime ago that after the end of the bounty campaign, the tokens I was given did not even worth 30$. In my own opinion I think such project names should be noted and people should be discouraged from participating in it in the future.

It is unfair to participate in drag campaigns too long but the amount of re-allocation is not high enough to spend time and effort. But now there are too many bounty players so you have to accept less dividends.

I think for higher rank it is worth their time even though allocations are small. But many people might see this not worth the time, so they are not joining on it.

If campaign with small allocations have limit for participants you can get good profit. But truth is majority of bounty companies give you less than 100$ even with good allocation. So you should work hard to find campaigns which brings more than 100 $, because it very rarely.

I think this has been a risk for the bounty hunters, because of the large number of participants joining the campaign, I think it is now possible to get more prizes rarely, because the ico project has split some percent in the number of their campaigns. , to be shared with all campaign participants.

It's absolutely true that there are some projects that only allocating a small percentage to the bounty hunters, specially for those low ranking members like you that is only a jr. member. But if you have a higher rank, you will feel more the amount that you can earn from bounty hunting.

It's not that bad and allows to get something really worthy. After all, everything you get you get depending on how many people participate and how many stakes are given for each task. I recommend that one  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3271100.40)since there are not that much of participants and the stakes are pretty fair.

I do not understand much what is meant by a low allocation, but I think that you wanted to say that this now makes it very difficult to participate for low-ranked participants, because now it is very difficult to find a project for junior members.