Participating in bounties with low allocations

[heritage35]

I cannot imagine promoting a project for months and at the end, all you can get is a meager amount of tokens. Yes, there are legit projects in the crypto space, but not all legit project worth participating in.
Why am i saying this?
There are projects that only allocate just 1% of the total sale made to bounty hunters.
My concern now is, does it worth devoting one's time to a project that will be only pay you token worth less than $100 after months of participation?

[1714930608]

1714930608

[1714930608]

1714930608

[liangweicha]

Most of the time, if the proportion of the bounty thread is not high, then the participants will not be particularly large.
So you can distribute as many tokens as you can.

[ronsaldo]

It is not bad to join bounty campaign with low allocations at least it is legit and only have a limit in participants.

[longwintershere]

I cannot imagine promoting a project for months and at the end, all you can get is a meager amount of tokens. Yes, there are legit projects in the crypto space, but not all legit project worth participating in.
Why am i saying this?
There are projects that only allocate just 1% of the total sale made to bounty hunters.
My concern now is, does it worth devoting one's time to a project that will be only pay you token worth less than $100 after months of participation?

first of all let's be honest with ourselves when we say how much work bounty is. It's not. I'm also joining bounty campaigns now and then, but it takes me max 10 minutes each day to get the work done. If you worked for fiat that much, how much would you get paid?

[qomariah95]

Of course this is a serious problem. But before you participate in bounty, you must first look at the allocation given for bounty. If you think that allocation is enough, it is better to participate. All of that goes back to someone who wants to participate in bounty. Indeed bounty allocations vary each campaign. So choose to join or not.

[richman3451]

it's legitimately there is a side-chapel in the participants as well as the possibility of more income I'm just such and looking for a bounty

[alrez]

If the time taken up to more than 1 month and only worth $ 100, that's too little in my opinion. You should consider how much you will earn, before you join a bounty, so do not regret later. There are so many bounties you can choose, so do not despair, you just have to choose the one you want.

[cryptonad]

If I really believed that the project will become succesful in future and can be useful by their users one day then less allocated budget is not an issue to me. Being rewarded with less amount after ICO didn't trouble me much if the project is good because I am participating bounty not to sell after ICO but to increase my investment for future.

[frowsiter]

I think that is all right to get those 100 bucks rather than getting nothing in the hands. Now a bounty hunter would be person who will participate in more than 100;s of the ICO in a month and thus if even 50 of them turn out to be green one and pay you 100 bucks each then you end up earning at least 5K USD after months of work. So it doesn't matter how much they are paying and depending upon that you should be paying attention to it or not. But its all about how much time you can devote by yourself to make nice fortune from scratch. At least thats some money, many time people dont even get pennies in their hands.

[DreamerJ]

As for me, bounty campaign became no profitable at all. May be because of a large number of participants,,

[grknondr]

I cannot imagine promoting a project for months and at the end, all you can get is a meager amount of tokens. Yes, there are legit projects in the crypto space, but not all legit project worth participating in.
Why am i saying this?
There are projects that only allocate just 1% of the total sale made to bounty hunters.
My concern now is, does it worth devoting one's time to a project that will be only pay you token worth less than $100 after months of participation?

For example, the bounty will continue 2 months and at the end, you will gain 100 $. How much time do you spend to complete a week? Just 20 or 30 minutes for a weekly report. Then this means that you spend only 2 hours in 2 months . This is not a much time. And you have possiblity earn more than 100$.

[Nilupulie]

Yes. That is absolutely true. It is not worth to participate if they allocate a small amount for bounty hunters. Normally i do consider to participate only for large allocations for bounty campaigns. Further most of the bounty campaigns they allocates high percentage for Signature campaigns and Blog campaigns. I always try to do blog articles to receive highest rewards.

[LooBaao]

Most of the time, if the proportion of the bounty thread is not high, then the participants will not be particularly large.
So you can distribute as many tokens as you can.

Since the number of participants in the Bounty is pretty much, so the bonus distributed to everyone will be lower. Over the next few years the number of participants will increase, so we will receive a small bonus.

[NewBet]

Don't participate in bounties that have low allocations, if you do so then you are just setting yourself up for disappointment when the rewards are finally paid out because you would not be getting a lot out of the bounty. If you want to make a good amount of money from bounties then you should always participate in the ones that have a high percentage of allocation for bounties

[Fenderr]

I sincerely think that for a bounty hunter to make the most out of a signature bounty for example, there needs to be limits set, number of participants can be set too while the criteria for entry and participation set very high as well. This will certainly make it worthwhile.

[Fenderr]

Don't participate in bounties that have low allocations, if you do so then you are just setting yourself up for disappointment when the rewards are finally paid out because you would not be getting a lot out of the bounty. If you want to make a good amount of money from bounties then you should always participate in the ones that have a high percentage of allocation for bounties

You're absolutely right my friend. I look at the percentage of bounty allocation and that determines to a very large extent if I'll participate in it or not. I have control participation but I don't have control over what number of tokens I get in the end.

[IrenNTA]

I cannot imagine promoting a project for months and at the end, all you can get is a meager amount of tokens. Yes, there are legit projects in the crypto space, but not all legit project worth participating in.
Why am i saying this?
There are projects that only allocate just 1% of the total sale made to bounty hunters.
My concern now is, does it worth devoting one's time to a project that will be only pay you token worth less than $100 after months of participation?

Actually it's quite normal when a project allocates about 1-2% all its hardcap for bounty. If you see numbers like 5-10% then most likely they set such high amont only to attact participants and then they'll most likely change the amount in the end.

[aioc]

I cannot imagine promoting a project for months and at the end, all you can get is a meager amount of tokens. Yes, there are legit projects in the crypto space, but not all legit project worth participating in.
Why am i saying this?
There are projects that only allocate just 1% of the total sale made to bounty hunters.
My concern now is, does it worth devoting one's time to a project that will be only pay you token worth less than $100 after months of participation?

It is very important to look for allocation and if there is an existing spreadsheet so you can look how many stakes are for a particular campaign and how many are participating, then decide for yourself if it is worth joining in this campaign, of course checking if the campaign is legit is the first thing you should do.

[Yaunfitda]

I cannot imagine promoting a project for months and at the end, all you can get is a meager amount of tokens. Yes, there are legit projects in the crypto space, but not all legit project worth participating in.
Why am i saying this?
There are projects that only allocate just 1% of the total sale made to bounty hunters.
My concern now is, does it worth devoting one's time to a project that will be only pay you token worth less than $100 after months of participation?

Of course its not worth to join such  bounty because of the amount allocate to the bounty hunters. 1% that's ridiculous low, and that 1% allocation is still divided amongst different bounty such as signature campaign, facebook and twitter campaigns, blogs content and Youtube videos.

I would not join such bounties because all your effort is not worth for even a week, much less a bounty campaign that will last for weeks with minimal payouts. Not worth it mate.

[Sithara007]

If you look at the signature bounties, then I have to say that the average reward ranges anywhere from $0 to $5,000 (or even more if you are extremely lucky). If the ICO is a very good one, then even a 1% allocation can bring you a decent amount of funds. On the other hand, if the ICO fails, then all your time and effort will be wasted.