Bitcoin Forum

As full time or part-time bounty hunters identifying best bounties are very important since there is a tendency of increasing scam ICO''s now. Here I am giving some attention to the following factors when choosing good bounties.
1. Rating- If the ICO has some rating. If this rating is good or high it is an indication that this is a good ICO.
2. Managers of the bounty- some managers have a good reputation such as Amazix ,  Kripital etc.
3. The team behind the project -IF the team is strong and capable with good track record it is an indication that the bounty and ICO will succeed.
These are the main points come into my mind. Please include all your valuable suggestions here!!

You need to find ones that are selling tokens, no rewards if it's not a successful ICO.

I always just look for one that's likely to sell a lot of tokens, thats the most important thing.

I always pay attention to the number of coins that will be paid to me, I do not agree to small amounts, the quantity can always grow into quality.

This has always been my problem while joining bounty, especially signature bounty. How can one know the amount of tokens that will be due to you after the campaign from the beginning?? Is it possible to know this? I really want please..

I think the ones he is talking about is the fixed amount of tokens that you can get in a campaign. For example, in a campaign, Legendary Members can get a 1500 tokens per week. If it is in the form of stakes per week, you can manually compute it to know the value you are going to get. It has something to do with the numbers of participants, I think.

As a bounty hunter, you need to choose the right ICO for your planned participation on signature bounty campaign. Just make sure that the bounty manager handling the ICO project has no red trust rating with good reputation and the team handling the project is also part of the consideration. Also, I prefer to check on the spreadsheet and checked if there are many high ranking members participating to such ICO.

Well ICO's are always with lot of surprises. Remember that ICO ratings are not the good way of predating about the market at all because those ratings that are done on the bounty portals or ICO ratings sites may or may not be true one. I mean most of the time ICO bounties will be in placed to vote for them and in exchange to that they offer few tokens. People go and vote almost every other ICO as good one just to get few tokens and thus it doesnt matter anymore if the ICO is really true one or not. We cant help us with the ratings but only with extensive studies.

Managers isn't impotant item for me, one manager may manage good projects as well as bad, Amazix also had bad projects which didn't pay. One more important item for me is how many tokens are allocated.

No one can guess a certain ICO that it is best bounties to participate with. But at least we will know some simple tips to find out that ICO is good. You must check its roadmap and whitepaper if there is any. Then you must join their telegram groupd and look for some reviews and comments there. Check the record and history of the manager and also sheck if there are lots of participants. That is how i look for a prospect bounty. But no guarantee that you will really get the perfect bounty for you...

Many ways to find out best bounties are as following:-----
We need to choose right ICO. Check road map,join their telegram group and look some reviews & comments. We need to check record & history of manager. Check spread sheet & one other main point is how many tokens are allocated.

You can find out from the background of the company. If good course of course bountynya also good. And you should also see the allocation given to bounty participants. If the allocation is large it is certainly very good for us to participate in it.

To choose best bounty to participate, I go through the whole project by reading all the information from the white paper. Then I see the sale distribution of tokens. Then I joined telegram groups for reviews and comments of other people about that bounty.

First thing I would look for is the team behind the project, check if they are not using false identities or something like that, also look for them on social media and their background. The second thing I would look for is the manager of the bounty, it is not exclusive, but if it has a high rank on the forum then that could be a great sign.

\Bitcointalk Username: pimondcrypto
Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2245688
Telegram: @herial1404
ETH address: 0xd0006d906f53D5480180D1c99963304E4a04EEcF

Nobody knows the best of benevolence whom we can just guess by turning to the team and the number of participants!

this is a problem of lot of people, most of the time the investors get confused about it they can't decide where to participate and to be honest it is actually bit hard nobody can decide where to get involved, but normally you can decide by knowing which one offering more tokens and other required facilities

Those are some good points there. I dont know about rating scores by reviewers, i dont know how biased they are, and i hope they are not and are neutral on the insight they provide.  Bounties are harder nowdays, a lot of them dont pay, or pay poorly

Thank for the help how to find better bounty campaign you had point but all of that are basic requirements of bounty hunters before they participate in the icos project. But aside from you need to earn the ico project it is useful for the demands in the market about the roadmap and whitepapar to got success.

I agree, there are several criteria to be able to choose a good bounty. usually I will see the whitepaper because in it there is information that we can get about the project that will be followed. by choosing a good project I hope the result will be good too.

These are indeed good criteria to chose a bounty campaign, but not enough. I could name you campaigns where the bounty hunters have been cheated which had been run by each of the best bounty managers around. With ICO rating I've seen horrors as well. As for the team, that's probably the best indicator - if you can judge the team properly.

I have my own choice of a good bounty, the most important is that I'm not tempted by the big rewards from the bounty, then I see their whitepapers and work teams and products produced, then I'll see how big their future prospects are, as a consideration I will see the ICO rating diwebsite as well as Bounty Manager organizer, and of course is confidence that bounty is good to follow.

your ideas are pretty good thanks for the contributions about knowing good projects and now i can now know how to follow the good project . not participating on scammed projects.

Also it is worth paying attention to the whitepaper of the project, because if it is interesting, then it can be concluded that the team made a lot of efforts to create a whitepaper.

Yes of course it ia very important to know what is the basic strategy to choose a best bounty campaign since scam are spreading. Being knowledgeable to determine good bounty in also important because you know how to eliminate the scam ICO's or bounty from legitimate bounty. Moreover having more experience can help us to distinguish good bounty.

personally, i will see the whitepaper and the roadmap. because by looking at it then we will know about the project and can choose whether the project has a good prospect in the future or not. we must choose bounty well in order to get a legit ico and can avoid the scam ico.

This is not always the case but it helps. It is easy now to pay someone to give a high rating on your project.

Most probably this will help but not all the time but at least you have a chance with the project.


This is the most important aspect if you want to really find out a good project. The team behind it plays a major role.

By looking at the rating of ICOs in my opinion is the right choice in appeal to see the website or whitepaper. Because with the rating we would immediately know that the vision and mission of ICOs is good or not depending on the rating.

Everyday there are irrelevant questions like this one whether it's a guide to the newbies or just to help other bounty hunters.

But whether you have these guidelines it's still inevitable that those points isn't enough to identify those projects that are hiding through a good manager but soon will turn into a scam.

Ratings? well most of them now are paid, the highest paid, the best review.

This is one sad reality in this forum. I understand your sentiments bro.

I think a little bit Research is good enough to identify best bounty. Good analyze of the white paper, ratings of the ICO is the main key for finding good bounty program. Realistic roadmap and the information about the members is also required to identify best bounties.

The two most important points, one is the project positioning one is the team. The positioning of the project determines its growth space, and the team determines whether the project can be successfully developed and whether it will succeed. This is what you need to seriously examine.

ICO rating is not a standard I refer to. For example, ICOBENCH rating is shit, so it is not worth reference.
ICODROPS, for example, are worth referring to because they are objective

Besides ico rating websites and best bounty managers, i think if a bounty managed by a team such as sandraevans, amazix, bountyhive, bountyguru you'll get something in the end. If you entered an unknown managers bounty its %99 percent that you'll get nothing.

It is very difficult nowadays to find and participate in one of the best bounties but with proper knowledge and experience one can achieve it

Normally which product get a high rating that means this is the best product. Like ICO market, People should find out rating or last year record can compare to other.

to choose a program bounty.I don't have a lot of criteria that detail.I use some basic selection very simple.
1. How many token hasbeen sold out when ico sale still running.in here we can see how many investor join in this project.
2. How much and who their partner that was support their project.
3. Bounty manager that have high rank or popular in bounties program..
Maybe just it my criteria to choose bounty campaign..maybe can to be recommended to other bounty hunter

I normally just scan the bounty section and look for popular threads, then just research the ICO after that.

Do you know that the ico rating can be manipulated. there are some ico projects that have a rating of 4 but the project is deceiving many people. I think it is very difficult to find a quality ico in this year.

From my point of view to find out the good bounties everyone have to consider several factors. Many scams around beside the bounties. Scam has no information. So follow this you can easily find out scam. Also to find out good bounties you have to find out ideal category for example social media followers, writing skill etc.

I always pay attetion on the trusted bounty managers and if the ICO has a partnership on the celebrities. I don't think on the allocation because it's only a numbers.

I think it depends on how you rate the bounty, because according to people's opinion is different, so to determine the best bounty must also vary according to each person, personal advice from me, I always follow the bounty manager that I think trusted

Do ones from a good bounty manager.

Well, I don't trust ICO ratings anymore because of what I've read before the leaked conversation of the man working on ICOBench and a manager from a specific ICO they've cheated the ratings and paid an exact amount for that kind of dirty work.

It’s good to know all of that mate. You much really research everything before you attend or joining any campaigns.  It is not easy to exert effort in bounties without any reward. Bounty manager is the main  to look into if they have a good ratings and other factors will follow.

high ICO rating is not a good ICO guarantee, I still remember when I follow some ICO that has a high rating, it turns out ICO ended with fraud, I also remember there is an ICO that does not reach softcap, does not have a good rating, but very success, I think ICO is a good ico who has a strong team and is able to sell their tokens and have a sustainable business idea.

Not always the reputation of bounty manager helps. I used to do a lot of Tokensuite's bounty who had a very good reputation as bounty service provider but later realized that most of their projects are scams or fail to be successful and even the successful one usually has a very little reward. It's always better to study whitepapers, check out whether the team members of a particular ICO project is legit or fraud.

We have they same preference mate in looking best bounties to participate.  It is really a big factor the rank of the bounty managers and the trust ratings, the higher the rank the trusted manager they are. Trust rating is always important,  we can't encounter scam if our bounty have a lot of trust ratings.

I agree with you for the reasons stated above. But I want to add that is: the goal of the project, the ability to develop and the target audience in the project is really growing, qualified for the project to succeed!

I don't trust the ratings. The best way to choose a bounty company is to study the project. Even good bounty managers often have projects that are a Scam. Just do a project analysis.

Well as a bountyhunter i choose quality over quantity ico before i join. 1st is i review their white paper and see their website if its high quality then it would be interesting . Then im looking forward also with a project which has already a prototype this means a lot to me . Then see if their community  is good and big and i review the team behind if they  are legit. I like joining bountycampaigns at bountyhive this platform always successful on the bounty /ico they handle plus they are legit and paying platform.

we ourselves can not predict whether the bounty will succeed or not in the time of division of bounties for those who follow ..
which is important we all have positive thoughts for all bounty projects that we will follow.
and do not feel sorry when finished if not get a prize Due to the failure of a project..!!

To find best bounty i think first we have to know about their company and the background history by reading their whitepaper to check their roadmap , is their policy beneficial for us or not, their allocation.

I disagree with numbers 1 and 2. Not all ratings are true. Icobench is a proof. There has been a news circulating the forum that ICO experts are being paid to give high ratings in ICObench. Upon knowing, I realized that yes, it may be true because I know some ICOs which have high ratings but ended not so good. Number 2 sometimes is effective. Sometimes isn't. Not all ICOs handled by known managers are profitable as well. They may be good but because these managers are popular, the number of participants are too much which results to low bounty rewards.

A good research on the members of the company is good enough to find good bounties I guess. If the managers and developers have a good reputation then I guess it is wise to invest time on the bounties. A realistic roadmap is also essential to find good bounties and to know the ratings of the ICO and quality of the tokens is also very important.

Are you still trying to make money on the Internet and you can not do it? Then I'm your kind wizard, who will show you how to do it.   P2PS
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3267287
https://www.p2psf.org

What do you mean by that? all of the ICO's are selling tokens during their crowdsale and private dealings but some of them turn out to be fraud ones if you are talking about released coins on the exchange then that is not the pure basis for determining best ICO, well for the OP ratings will not fully help you in finding those hidden gems and legit ICO's even some scorers online can be paid to have a good ratings or to gain some premium listings so don't fully trust the ratings, they help but not to the extent that it will be the best option.

You may also want to consider if it is affiliated to credible bounty platforms or to some with bad reputations like tokensuite. The problems sometimes is not within the manager but for some reason there is a continuous trend of bounties from tokensuite that do not pay its participants so its best to avoid these scammers.

As a bounty hunter I always pay attention on its value what I will gain from it and its number. You can also compute you needs and checked the ranking I guess you will find your the result.

I never agree that good rating from an ICO rating site is a sign of good bounty because now a days more people were just buying the ratings to increase the reputation of the project then only they can have more investors.

There are some simple guidelines for finding the best bounty hunting. Inspect the project is the first thing to do. Find your ideal category is next,  we need to know where to find bounties and at the same time look out for scammers. And lastly we need to socialize with the developers to be active 24/7.

To find best bounties, you may first consider avoiding scam bounty projects by checking out the team and concept of the project and bounty pool and asking questions to the members of the teams. Also, make sure whether the project uses a bounty campaign providing automated services so that the tracks are not loosed and the activities are recorded securely. Best of luck.

Many people recommend you the ones that give you the most tokens, but that's not always useful, they may give you a lot of tokens but the rules are very simple and everyone can participate, that would cut your share of the participation, I would recommend you to see the bounty managers and interact with them, a good bounty manager can be the difference between a successful ICO or not. The higher the prestige, the more likely it is to succeed.

Since I experienced many scam in bounty campaigns I am particular with those bounty managers. Those I've experienced good managers I follow their bounty programs just to make sure. As of now it is hard to detect scam bounty campaigns.

the social media of the project is very important.Shares less or no results are not good.
If the sharing is very good the result is good

Bounty campaigns are very risky yet if you happen to be in one of a good project, it will give you good amount of cryptos.
I just think that no one can really tell if a bounty project is good or a dad one. Any campaign could be a scam and I think most campaigns only focus on selling their coins to have enough value.
I guess it is really seldom that there is a project that pushes innovation and convenience.

But in the forum, as an experience, always check the company's background. If all people look very accountable and reliable. There is a complete profile and papers about the project and goals.
There are specific guidelines that somehow will hep you avoid scams that is for sure. So have precautions.

not much I pay attention to choosing ico I just look at the allocation of funds that it distributes that interest me

That's a good point you are describing here. yes, always successful projects do not have a rating and good rated projects are not always successful. Therefore we should not solely depend on ratings.

Really a good point. mostly this comes with the experience. But for newcomers, your experience regarding bounty managers are very valuable. When you have some free times hare those experience with us!!

Expert cryptocurrency enthusiasts clearly describe which bounty is good to participate. Even with those one cannot have a cent percent assurance about the bounty. Each and everything with the bounty has got dependence on different factors such as development team, funding, marketing team. When something goes wrong there will be big impact upon the progress of the the ICO. This affects the bounty participants.

I think how to find a good bounty in a simple way is to find a good manager bounty, or by looking at participants. if many are participating, then the bounty can be good. I as a beginner, do it that way.

1. ICO rate: Their project listed on 9 ICO-rating websites, but aslo scam. (For example: Crytoriya.io)
2. Manager: like a guy said above. Amazix team got the mistakes.
3. They can use the fake information. You can not recognize all of them.

But you can combine 3 factors above to decide whether to join a bounty. If they have a strong team with full information and the solution that they solve is good and can be developed in near future, you can join their bounty campaign. So, do not be rigid.

First of all is to check their token sale, try to find out the viability of the project in the coming months, try reading the white paper and ascertain if the project is attractive to you and also check out for the bounty managers because they really determine the level of positivity of a bounty project and finally check out for the team that is the team or logistics behind the project you might have interest in.

that's great explantion for us.complicated and need our research to find best bounties.sometime successful project has good tokensale result and its reached hardcap.but it doesnt have good bounty manager, and make it not paid.

I do try as much as possible to follow up the bounty managers that are identified as legitimate ones and most reliable. This is cool and will save you some stress of researching the projects yourself, the bounty managers would have done most of the research work on behalf of Bounty hunters and possibly investors as well.

In not agree with the rating base on website like icobench,icoholder,tracico and etc. Just by seeing a lot of scam ico but rated 4.0 up. Team is also said as verify but for me it's fake profile. I do research for their video  but even one I can't find

I will say I go with the bounties initiated by higher ranks of bitcointalk members.  I am not saying that the lower members are just hoax, but higher ranks has more experience and more credible.  Research is also a factor in choosing bounty to join with.

Actually we can find this in various way based on this if you search in internet then you can know the better result for bounties and you have to careful for scams because in market there are many of them so try to avoid it.

I will see the people involved in the project and also the objectives of the project

you can check the background of the company, if indeed the company is good then ico will be good. the background is very important, and also the team that protects it, if the team is already professional, usually ico will succeed.

Bounties are the programs where you get rewards for performing various tasks. The rewards are given in the form of token. For being a good bounty project, it must have a high ICO rating, good reputation of the managers and a strong and capable team.

aside from what you have mention, the teams integrity is a must see and the importantly, if it is feasible for the moment because the timing of a project is vital to its success. though the project is good but the market is down, most probably the chance of ico success is low. so check on timing it is everything.

From my perspective to discover the great bounties everybody need to think about a few variables. Numerous tricks around adjacent to the bounties. Trick has no data. So take after this you can without much of a stretch discover trick. Additionally to discover great bounties you need to discover perfect class for instance web-based social networking adherents, composing aptitude and so forth.

A big plus for providing hints on how to find a good bounty to participate. To be able to have a good bounty campaign these days, it needed to be a good rating in order to clarify that the bounty campaign that you are joining is of legit. Because many bounty campaign now turns out to be a scam after all. So better be careful about it.

not all ico who have a good rating will guarantee ico will be successful, because currently a lot of ico has a very good rating but they fail in sales and their coin prices fall when entering the market

the team is an important indicator for the analysis of the bounty that wants to follow. a good team will certainly be able to produce the bounty is good too. But if the site rating ICO might be a little doubtful because the result of a lot of ICO is sometimes different from the existing rating assessment. better to give its own assessment and analysis.

If it is, the numbers of tokens can only be computed at the end of the campaign because you cant still know how much stakes there will be unless all participants are posting enough and earning fix stakes per week.

Until now I don't see any worth lesson about find the best bounties, the chance is always 50 - 50. I only see from their from news up date, if i don't see it in 2 weeks I should stop and find another one. Information is important because from there we can see project progress. Up to you but never join project with loyalty concept, they will fall before end.

To find the best bounties to participate in them, there is need for you to read their whitepaper to know the objectives of their projects and the time the project will ls last. I think a good project should not be more than 2 months

Very well said my friend, your factors/ tips when choosing best bounties to participate will be very helpful to all newbies and some other members who have difficulties finding good/ best bounty campaign to participate.

Not generally the notoriety of abundance chief makes a difference. I used to complete a ton of Tokensuite's abundance who had a decent notoriety as abundance specialist organization however later understood that the vast majority of their activities are tricks or neglect to be fruitful and even the effective one more often than not has a next to no reward. It's in every case better to think about whitepapers, look at whether the colleagues of a specific ICO venture is genuine or extortion.

Before participating in the Bounty campaign I pay attention personally to the team, advisors, partners, respectively the idea and the product.

Not generally the notoriety of abundance chief makes a difference. I used to complete a considerable measure of Tokensuite's abundance who had a decent notoriety as abundance specialist co-op yet later understood that the greater part of their undertakings are tricks or neglect to be effective and even the fruitful one ordinarily has a next to no reward. It's in every case better to consider whitepapers, look at whether the colleagues of a specific ICO venture is genuine or extortion.

I think its better if you add more managers that has a good reputation in terms of managing bounties.

In joining bounties, I also look if the project is feasible/attainable. There are some that as a good write ups and WP but to good to be true. It is really important to become observant and wise in joining bounties so you wont end up with nothing.

I agree partly to your indicators, but the rating of ICOs is not a good indicator. I am always seeing a project which has a high rating of 9.2 in ICOBENCH and also in another rating site, but the end, it is a Ponzi. So you should evaluate by your own.

If you are seeking for a good bounty to be participated, then you should visit their website as well and read its white paper because in the whitepaper it should be mention there on what it the use of the token in crypto, and also have the background check regarding with the team who created this project.

We have different strategies about this but the most common one is on joining bounty groups which have a well know manager. This way we could easily find a good bounty having manager we could trust in.

It is very difficult to know the best bounty, because the best bounty is a bounty that pays all participants with a large amount and does not end in a scam.
Whereas to find out the project is a scam or not when the project is running and when it ends.
So my advice is to follow the many bounties that you think are potentially successful, so when there is a scam you still have several other bounties.

First you need read and understand the bounty thread about the bounty pool. Know how many token or how many percentage they give as bounty rewards. Then try to know about the campaign is legit or scam by reading ann thread whitepaper and team members. Then try to know how much dollars rise . Those you can understand about bounty campaign. Thanks.

If you are a newbie, you should be gathering a useful information about the bounty that you want to join, so that you time would not be wasted out of doing the bounty tasks.

I have used the knowledge and experience to research projects on objectives, technology, route, method, supply, team, manager of rewards ... Refer to the rankings, community reactions about the project to select the project to participate in the reward campaign.

First i see the token value and the manager from the gift hunter itself, also the follower of the bounty because of course if the ico good thn the followers will be much. I don't deny sometimes reading wp to see the price. But if that i have more time. But that's barely i do.

I just research the project development team, the  projects bounty manager, their partners, roadmaps, the extent of success in the projects as well as the contents of their whitepapers.

actually many bounties that scem right now, and it will make the participant confuse to join bounty again

do you know the trick and tips to know how a good bounty is?

you can check the background of the company, if indeed the company is good then ico will be good. the background is very important, and also the team that protects it, if the team is already professional, usually ico will succeed.

Rating based identification of the crypto projects is worst way to go behind the legit projects. Most of the projects are getting the ratings by paying the rating sites and thus they just show off with those ratings. Dont fall for such rating system which is centralised one and is being controlled based on the money. Just pick any ICO whether it is legit or shit one and go check its ratings. You will definitely find that all of them have ratings which are scoring more than 90%. I dont really understand how they are reviewing each of them as legit one and scoring them above 90%. Lolz. I guess we should know that they all are paid one and mostly fake. Rest you can check the buzz, documents, protocols and communication of the team to see its legitimacy.

You can find worthy bounty campaigns by checking the fundraising target status of the ico project....if softcap is reached.
If the team knowns their onion, if the ico project have a working product and if it is not facing any sec challenges etc.

I agree, finding a good bounty campaign and would be base on the rating is not the best thing to do, ratings can be fake and can be done by paying the site to increase the vote for their ico rating.

First, I usually see their project based on the whitepaper, then I see how much is allocated for the bounty and who handles the bounty. see also who is behind the project.

The best bounty campaign is when the token is already listed on the Exchange.
So when the campaign is complete, you can immediately sell the token.

Campaigns like this are rare except for the tokens specifically for events.

The best awards are given for signed and translations, but the rest is also good, but there is a small percentage of income and participants much more, but they also pay, but the most profitable are signatures, translations, personally I body everything, both social and signed, I take everything from the project and is satisfied so far

the project has successfully raised funds during private sales and has collaborated with venture capital companies.

My strategies in finding a legitimate bounties is by looking if who is the bounty manager. Bounty manager is also one the key things in considering a legit bounties. Like for example, these are my lists of legit and trusted bounty manager, yahoo66278, newsilike, btcltcdigger, the tokensuite, arteezy and many more.

All three are factors that need to be considered to find the good project. But I don't trust so much the rating. It just evaluate outside and often not be exact

For bounty today i think major factor is who providing this bounty.
Bounty manager is the guarantee what you are get your rewards

the most important thing for me is the team from the ICO and the ICO has cooperated with any company, in my opinion the important factor is to analyze the bounty project, if they have a team that is already well-known experts and big corporate partners it is clearly impossible for the ICO to be fraudulent

If you want to participate in a good bounty, I suggest you research as if you want to invest to know if it's good ICO before participating in its bounty campaign, some bounties end up being scam while some you get the reward but it's worth nothing

I agree with the second point that you mentioned, where you say "Managers of the bounty some managers have a good reputation" but I have an impressive experience working with yahoo62278, lutpin, and Wapinter. they are the best manager in my view

ICO ratings are not a good measure of viability since these sites are also some form of advertising wherein they are getting paid for their rates. Also, the reputation of bounty managers do not really matter much because they too have experienced scam or failed projects as well.

To find the best bounties to joined I always check: 1. First their bounty manager and their teamwork. 2. Their scope and how to implement their projects. 3. Check their rate based on rating of hunters.

not all the ico ratings are legit, sometimes its just a paid ratings from the project, so better to become more careful with that, managers is one of the factors that I am looking, especially those managers who are known and influencial.

but it looks like right now the rating can't determine a good ico or not because lately there is ico that has a good rating but it turns out that ico ends with a scam, but maybe the number 2 and 3 factors are still able to judge a good ico or not.

Please be aware that ratings from different sites that have no meaning in the bounty. Thus the rating even many wrong and inappropriate expectations. take a look at the concept of the bounty is carried, it is important to determine whether it will be developed or not. See also the wallet existing contract to ensure there are real investors and this is not an ICO scam. consider also the team that there is a good team because it will give you results that bounty is also good.

I also pay attention to this when choosing a bounty program. I also look at the project roadmap and read the project document.

There are sites that list out the newest bounties that are currently ongoing so you can google one of these sites and get a look at the ongoing bounties. After that is when the real work starts as you are going to have to start researching those bounties that you think is good enough so you can be sure of the bounties before you invest in the project.