|
Title: delete Post by: BitcoinEXpress on October 20, 2011, 10:07:49 AM delete
Title: Re: delete Post by: ElectricMucus on October 20, 2011, 11:36:33 AM At this point I think it is mainly a drama generating technique. ::)
Title: Re: delete Post by: k9quaint on October 20, 2011, 02:53:44 PM Coinhunter sent out a tweet stating that he would release Solidcoin version 2.01 with Source Code tomorrow. http://twitter.com/TheRealSolid In IRC chats he has emphatically stated he will not release Solidcoin 2.0 due to proprietary reasons. I think everyone knows my opinion of this, so no need in repeating it. What is yours? ~BCX~ It appears there are proprietary control mechanisms in 2.0 that gave Coinhunter total control over the block chain. We shall see to what extent they are removed in 2.01. Title: Re: delete Post by: Raoul Duke on October 20, 2011, 03:17:58 PM Once more here is coinhunter playing BCX like the puppet he is...
Title: Re: delete Post by: johnj on October 20, 2011, 03:23:43 PM It'll be interesting to see whats inside of it. Or rather, to hear about what others say whats inside of it.
Even more interesting if it sheds light on who are the 'trusted' nodes - I'm genuinely curious as to who is holding the 1m+ 'fake' Solidcoins, and if they can be matched up to forum members. I wouldn't be suprised in the least if the same SC supporters who are so vehement in their support were also given 1m+ coins. Also, I'm curious as to what the 'public miners' are doing while the 'trust nodes' are finding their block. Title: Re: delete Post by: Sannyasi on October 20, 2011, 03:27:02 PM nice advertising for him. watching this war is entertaining.
Q: what would I do without my forum drama..... A: probably something useful..... Title: Re: delete Post by: johnj on October 20, 2011, 03:30:34 PM nice advertising for him. watching this war is entertaining. Q: what would I do without my forum drama..... A: probably something useful..... Meh, I don't really think it's 'advertising'. Sure it's 'about' SC, but I doubt anyone is gonna sign up for it after reading how vulnerable the network is. I mean, if a reporter does a story about a murderer, are they 'advertising' murder? (yes it's an extreme example, no CH is not a murderer) Title: Re: delete Post by: tacotime on October 20, 2011, 03:58:34 PM Good, I'll have an iterative solution to his recursive algorithm soon after.
Title: Re: delete Post by: johnj on October 20, 2011, 04:47:04 PM Good, I'll have an iterative solution to his recursive algorithm soon after. Honestly, taco, I want to know where you got this recursive algorithm stuff from. The source I saw and the source Coinhunter posted on these forums has no recursion in the hashing algorithm what-so-ever.... not to say that source wasn't wrapped in something else but you're the only one I see saying this and I'm dying to know where you heard/saw that. How much of the source have you seen, viper? Title: Re: delete Post by: tacotime on October 20, 2011, 06:03:33 PM How much of the source have you seen, viper? The hashing algorithm. Edit: A pre-beta version, but it wasn't all too different from what coinhunter posted in these forums elsewhere. It is from BCX's claims on here and of his GPU miner. SC2 supporters are claiming SHA-3 hashing algorithms -- if this is true it may be very open to attacks by FPGA/GPU. Title: Re: delete Post by: ElectricMucus on October 20, 2011, 06:30:20 PM You realize that SHA-3 is a not-released-yet in review process where several algorithms are considered and will not be for at least another year or more? (I don't have the numbers in mind but in this area)
BTCX is pulling your strings it seems :D Title: Re: delete Post by: DeathAndTaxes on October 20, 2011, 06:46:28 PM It'll be interesting to see whats inside of it. Or rather, to hear about what others say whats inside of it. Even more interesting if it sheds light on who are the 'trusted' nodes - I'm genuinely curious as to who is holding the 1m+ 'fake' Solidcoins, and if they can be matched up to forum members. I wouldn't be suprised in the least if the same SC supporters who are so vehement in their support were also given 1m+ coins. Also, I'm curious as to what the 'public miners' are doing while the 'trust nodes' are finding their block. 1m? You wish it was only 1m. Try 12m plus 10% wealth transfer mechanism into Real Solid person wallet. Title: Re: delete Post by: johnj on October 20, 2011, 06:54:02 PM It'll be interesting to see whats inside of it. Or rather, to hear about what others say whats inside of it. Even more interesting if it sheds light on who are the 'trusted' nodes - I'm genuinely curious as to who is holding the 1m+ 'fake' Solidcoins, and if they can be matched up to forum members. I wouldn't be suprised in the least if the same SC supporters who are so vehement in their support were also given 1m+ coins. Also, I'm curious as to what the 'public miners' are doing while the 'trust nodes' are finding their block. 1m? You wish it was only 1m. Try 12m plus 10% wealth transfer mechanism into Real Solid person wallet. The 1m+ was in reference to -each- predefined supernode. Title: Re: delete Post by: Raoul Duke on October 21, 2011, 12:52:39 AM It's the 21st of october already in Portugal and the Solidcoin network is still up despite BCX saying he would take it down and kill it before the 17th...
Goes both ways, sucker, or you wanted to be the only liar around here? Title: Re: delete Post by: k9quaint on October 21, 2011, 03:22:49 AM It is from BCX's claims on here and of his GPU miner. SC2 supporters are claiming SHA-3 hashing algorithms -- if this is true it may be very open to attacks by FPGA/GPU. If you search Coinhunter's own posts you will see where he posted the core hashing algorithm already. Citation please? I have seen no source code posted either here or at Solidcoin.info. Title: Re: delete Post by: Bitcoin Oz on October 21, 2011, 03:26:55 AM No I dont have 1million solidcoins and I never got invited to the next bilderburg meeting either.
Title: Re: delete Post by: k9quaint on October 21, 2011, 03:51:10 AM It is from BCX's claims on here and of his GPU miner. SC2 supporters are claiming SHA-3 hashing algorithms -- if this is true it may be very open to attacks by FPGA/GPU. If you search Coinhunter's own posts you will see where he posted the core hashing algorithm already. Citation please? I have seen no source code posted either here or at Solidcoin.info. There is no source code for anything posted. It is hard to prove a negative. Perhaps viperjm could provide a link to the code? Title: Re: delete Post by: freequant on October 21, 2011, 04:14:54 AM I guess you checked only CoinHunter's posts posted by CoinHunter.
Did you try CoinHunter's posts posted by Bulanula and CoinHunter's posts posted by Viperjm? Title: Re: delete Post by: Raoul Duke on October 21, 2011, 04:31:21 AM I guess you checked only CoinHunter's posts posted by CoinHunter. Did you try CoinHunter's posts posted by Bulanula and CoinHunter's posts posted by Viperjm? LOL and YEP, I even checked Coinhunter's post by Psy and Spacy. STFU... You are really a moron with less than half a brain. even if you had half a brain you wouldn't say that, but oh well, what to expect from someone full of shit like you.. BTW, when are you going to kill solidcoin? oh wait, it was supposed to be 4 days ago. LOL Once again: STFU troll, you are all words and no action. your wife must be very unhappy Title: Re: delete Post by: CoinHunter on October 21, 2011, 04:36:36 AM viper is incorrect about me posting the full hashing code. I did post the initialization code for it which is what I think he may be referencing.
4 people have been given the full hash code at various times and the opencl version of it has now been released so anyone wanting to look at it can check there. Full source will be out soon anyhow. Thanks for taking an interest in the SolidCoin project. Title: Re: delete Post by: k9quaint on October 21, 2011, 05:29:17 AM viper is incorrect about me posting the full hashing code. I did post the initialization code for it which is what I think he may be referencing. 4 people have been given the full hash code at various times and the opencl version of it has now been released so anyone wanting to look at it can check there. Full source will be out soon anyhow. Thanks for taking an interest in the SolidCoin project. Citation please? I just checked your latest posts on the solidcoin.info site and it has no mention of this release. The download source button still does nothing. Title: Re: delete Post by: Spacy on October 21, 2011, 06:36:41 AM Full source will be out soon anyhow. This is total bullshit from Coinhunter, he released 2.01 Beta 4 with no source and the Beta GPU miner.No source as expected. Do you actually read posts before you post bullshit? ;D Title: Re: delete Post by: Bitcoin Oz on October 21, 2011, 07:17:56 AM Full source will be out soon anyhow. This is total bullshit from Coinhunter, he released 2.01 Beta 4 with no source and the Beta GPU miner.No source as expected. Do you actually read posts before you post bullshit? ;D CH said he would post source today, no biggie.... well that's awkward.... edit://was it just me or did I see BTCeX remove his post about hacking into some files ? Title: Re: delete Post by: Spacy on October 21, 2011, 07:34:46 AM CH said he would post source today, no biggie.... well that's awkward.... edit://was it just me or did I see BTCeX remove his post about hacking into some files ? Yeah he removed some text... Title: Re: delete Post by: ElectricMucus on October 21, 2011, 07:43:31 AM At this point I think it is mainly a drama generating technique. ::) I hate to quote myself but: I told you so! ::)Title: Re: delete Post by: CoinHunter on October 21, 2011, 09:46:47 AM So he says he hacked my files, where is the source?
I'm not really sure why you people believe anything this guy? says. But hey. :) Title: Re: delete Post by: johnj on October 21, 2011, 07:34:49 PM So he says he hacked my files, where is the source? I'm not really sure why you people believe anything this guy? says. But hey. :) I never said I hacked your files. I was however able to grab a link of IRC that you dev posted for an earlier version of Reaper. I was able to gain access to D:\Projects and E:\koodaus and DL everything in them. I will make a post about it later. Well this is certainly a black/white claim. I'm indeed looking forward to your future post. However with such a black/white claim, failure to produce won't look good on your credibility. However, CH making any claims about other peoples credibility is laughable. Title: Re: delete Post by: Raoul Duke on November 01, 2011, 08:38:12 PM It's November 01 and still no source from Coinhunter. It's November 01 and you still haven't killed Solidcoin despite you saying that you would kill it before October 17... Suck it! Title: Re: delete Post by: johnj on November 01, 2011, 08:38:25 PM It's November 01 and still no source from Coinhunter. According to the header on the forums, it's due to be released today/tomorrow Title: Re: delete Post by: Ten98 on November 04, 2011, 02:11:37 PM It's November 01 and still no source from Coinhunter. According to the header on the forums, it's due to be released today/tomorrow Here's a similar sign http://a75.org/freecrabs.jpg Source is out now, so um... what now? Title: Re: delete Post by: johnj on November 04, 2011, 02:13:16 PM Source is out now, so um... what now? Yeah, and your pal RS has been caught redhanded with a spendable 12m+ premine. One guy has 85% of the coins and 100% of the control Title: Re: delete Post by: DeathAndTaxes on November 04, 2011, 02:17:05 PM Source is out now, so um... what now? Now that the source is out we know exactly why King RealScam hided it so long. It proves he has complete and irrevocable control over the network. |
