Bitcoin Forum

Most ICO's tend to hide their members behind the project. Is not it necessary to know about the team also who are building an ICO project, including other factors of it?

The project team is a factor in evaluating an ICO. No good ICO does not want to publicize their team, any project that does not publicize their team, I think the project is scam. .

Sure it is necessary. There are so much rubbish projects at the moment, that are simply copy pasting all the team from another project. Furthermore, you need to read the whitepaper and look at the products development. These are the core parts of an ICO success.

No that is not true, most of the real non-scam ICOs will show you their team, names and linkedin profiles. In fact is one of the only things you should need to check on any project.

You need to check every aspect of an ICO if you want to participate in it. You must read the whitepaper and look how many funds were already collected. I would also pay attention to the Roadmap and if the project is following it. Also to check the team members is a must.

Be sure to know the composition of the team. If a project hides members of its team, then this is a very dubious project.

Yes ofcourse for me it's necessary it is method to identify if the project behind of it is true and legit because other Ico project are scam and their team are poser or a fake accounts the other are anonymous having a good background of the team could bring positive in a project.

It is very necessary for us to know who the team behind the project is because now there are many ico who are scams in the middle of the road due to unclear teams.

Yes i think with the number of scam icos recently we have seen it is very important not only to know about the team members but also verify them by contacting them and asking a couple of questions to confirm that they are real.

A little advice, knowing a team behind ICO project does't guarantee how successful such project will end, also, view such team as legit and decide to invest into such ICO project might be disastrous, one thing is sure that before invest into any ICO double check the RoadMap and view how abiding the project is to it RoadMap.

The publication of the dev team or the people behind and ICO is a great way to increase their credibility and as such it will not only make the ICO good but it will be less likey to be called a scam so reviewing it or evaluating it is necessary, unless you really want to be scammed or get into a project that will not have a good value in the long term because regular update from them is needed by the investors to see that the project is moving forward.

Yes, reviewing the team behind of the ICO you’ll be investing is necessary. You must know their background if they had history of scheming or not. Inspecting the whitepaper is very important also. This would be handy incase their ICOs flopped, since you’ll get to ask them yourself what’s the reason behind it.

It is not necessary IF you ignore them.

Have you ever given your assets to who you have never know? If yes, you are a potentially charitable person in real world.

But investing to these ICOs is as throwing money out the window.

It's necessary, the ico that wants to hide their team members should be counted as a suspicious project consider even there was a scam ico that used or steal others identity top be used on their site. It becomes your responsibility to check any ico dude.

Reviewing and analyzing of everything in investing are so significant that you future income depend on these characteristics and their being true.

It is necessary to do every precautionary measure before investing in any project, just like checking the credibility of the development team, their whitepaper and most of all product but this is not the assurance for a 100% success of the project, it just a way to lessen chances of being a scam or having a shit project.

All information is necessary there because you benefit and profit depend on it and it is in your interests to know a lot about the project to save yourself from loss.

There's not really a reason why an ICO project wouldn't want to showcase their team (if they're actually good). It increases credibility and investors can get a sense of what the team's strengths are and how that can feed into the project's success.

well its better to the team showed and to know their connections behind, and showing their faces participating in an event or a conference, because of that investors more attracted to their works more transparency. so, i think its necessary.

If an ICO is genuine and they are doing it legally then they will show you full details about the project like team behind the project, contact place and contact details. As everyone knows that their are so many scam ICO are running so to get success in ICO funding it needs to be transparent so that investors should fell secure in investing the project.

In my humble opinion, that is the most important factor when reviewing ICOs to investo into or at least monitor once they are on exchanges and go into position. Check their backgrounds, experience, who they worked with, etc. An organic and massive community on social channels is also important, but only if it is active.

Of course this is one of the important things before you joining the ICO not only the team but almost all aspects you need to learn. But usually there are some projects that hide their identities but are already known in the blockchain world like Bitforex, so it all depends on the project you are going to follow. It's all just my opinion, you better believe your own decision.

Team members and advisers of a project are key criteria to check, to ensure that they are experienced enough to carry out
the project goals. There are projects where not all the team members are public, which does not necessarily means that the
project is scam, but they have to explain what the reason is for that.

Yes indeed, if you'll going to invest on something Valuable asset back up by big industry you should check the team development, their performance in the blockchain tech and on how they will solve the problem of the society. Which mean they have a real use.

There is a lot of scam ICOs in the past and there are more to come. These scammers are taking advantage of the decentralized technology. They are very confident that whatever happens they will be sued or get caught or penalized because no one is overseeing the whole cryptocurrency. So, better to perform due diligence before joining, and part of it is to evaluate and confirm the developers and advisers.

Of course, it is necessary. The identity of the team behind an ICO is a must. If I will be the investor, I will evaluate first behind the idea of creating the project. Their reputation and reliability, their professional background which is important in creating a project that is related to what they know and what they can do. How can you trust a project that hides the identity of their team? I think it is a red flag if there's a project like that, this is just my personal opinion.

Every project have to present his team, his concept, his road map of the project, the plan, and many things we should found that in the whitepaper or in the site, and i think that every project hiding those information is scam.

Its one of the most important factors to know who are the people behind the ICO Project. Its the team who is raising the funds via ICO and if you do not know the real people behind the project, it makes no sense in investing in an ICO. Its more or less like investing in a project ran by strangers and there is no guarantee that they are not going to scam you.

Yes of course. If the team don't be active, all the community will panic! So team is number one :) if the products are good but the team don't friendly and don't be active, maybe the investor and also the community don't like them.

It is really necessary and should be a must for investors because such action will give an initial assumption whether a campaign would be a scam or not. Some ICO projects are scams and since anonymity is present in cryptos, bounty hunters won't be able to do anything about it if they won't be paid for their work. so in order to avoid it early, make ICO team checking a habit. It would be an advantage despite of the time you are using to check upon the informations.

It will really affect for their project, now people already smart. They not believe for ico that hide their team. Because almost all ICO is regulated now, at least investor can feel safe when invest in it.

I think the ICO project team should be clear and that everything has been introduced on the website of the WAB or on white paper and 95% of the projects introduce it and if it is not there it is very risky for investors and investors usually if you want to join the ICO see the team whether it is real or not

Yes, to invest in an ICO project you need to consider the team behind the project. What are they like, how effective are they, who is the project leader? These are the factors that contribute to the success of the project and also help you avoid phishing projects. When investing, find out.

Sure i think this is necessary because the team i think is have important role to controling how a project can run success. You must check all aspect i think like is there real not fake, their experience, their background etc. But don't to forget to check other

It is very important to know the people behind the project you are going to invest in. If I don't know who they are how am I going to trust them and invest in them. If the team doesn't want to reveal their identity its possibly a scam.

I think we have to know the team of the project when we participate in ico.Because it can show the project background and technology.This is an important part of the project.

knowing the team ICO is crucial. It will give you confidence in the vote because of hands by a qualified and experienced team will produce the ICO certainly is also amazing. even as many are also scam in ICO so one good indication for this check is from the team that is behind ICO.

If you're interested in investing in an ICO it is important to review everything properly and this includes the team working behind the scenes. If a project is legit and has potential the team's identity will be available and if for some reason it isn't it could mean a potential scam and the reason why they aren't disclosing the identity of the people behind it. So, be careful about investing.

For me the validity of the team is essentially necessary for the future of a project. Cause if we don't know who are behind the project, that can be difficult to build trust between people/investors and the company they put an investment.

sometimes I find the topic where it discusses the false identity of a team ICO. This is certainly a sign that the ICO is quite prone to be a scam and by seeing the team behind this is compulsory at least. but that does not mean if there is not a clear team identity then it is either a scam. But if you want to safely then look for the obvious would be better.

In my case, i used that as one of many reason for me to join either in their bounty or on their ICO session.
Cause there are case that the list of the team mentioned in the sites is just fake account, and that is one of the indication that the project is fake.

Indeed, the way they work is that we really want to know that a team that is truly compliant and compact, we will support a team that is truly correct, if we don't know about the team, maybe we need the right time to know one day. basically we just support them in the project.

Of course you need to know the developers behind the project, it is one of the most important factor that can make us know whether its a scam or not, or even maybe whether they are professional or not, if the developers hide behind the project then most likely its a scam, if they really legit and want to make a good quality coin, then there should be no reson to hide the identity

A good ICO is the ICO that promotes public transparency. A good ICO, managed by a clear team, which has the concept of developing ICOs. Therefore, knowing about the team on an ICO is very important.

This is absolutely necessary. Investing on a project without knowing the team is like giving money to someone you just met on a train station. They might argue that bitcoin also founded by an unknown entity but the thing is, bitcoin is already a working product then. And it has already proven its worth in this space.

Yeah, its pretty right to study them because I have observed that many people to whom I met in the telegram were some managers at the ICO website page. It was shocking to see them as community manager, some xyz shit manager, etc etc. Now how come people who were just bounty hunters like you and me has become managers within the night. To be honest they are just getting paid to do so and show up their profiles over ICO page. Such projects cant be trusted where there are bounty hunters themselves trying to develop a project. lol.
So yeah, professional team must be there before one can enter into it.

Yes it's necessary to review the team behind first to assure it's not a scam project ,'cause mostly project nowadays are frauds which is always provide fake team behind and etc to scam investors. Especially nowadays which is so difficult to determine because of the testimonials and the website design such legit  investment site. So it's necessarily always to make a review and research  first to avoid scam project and lossing money

I see a lot of ICO nowasays who are not willing to show their team members faces which is very suspicious to me. This type of ICO should never be trusted and the funds that they collected showing on their website might also be fake. We should always do further research before investing to an ICO and checking the team members background always is a must.

ICO I participated in did not see the hidden team. I don't understand what they mean by doing this. But I will never participate in such an ICO. If they can't clearly disclose all the information, why should we invest in them? Will you spend money on something that you feel is unreliable?

I agree! Considering the ICO team is a necessity. I will learn about the team's experience, ability and attitude. This is one of the very important factors for choosing a potential ICO.

It is the main feature of analysis. Team will make a product, so good ,experienced team will make on demand product with all necessary features and will take place on a market

I think it is absolutely necessary, because very often, under the pretext of not passing KYC, there are scam projects that collect money and are washed away, undermining the credibility of cryptocurrency!

many projects are public and show their team there, only a small part hides, probably they are fraudsters

In my views, a legitimate ICO should be transparent and open to the people wherein team members of the ICO project should be established on their website. Starting with the whitepaper to have a clear information about the project platform and its purpose as well. Bounty managers also pays an important role as part of your consideration in joining an ICO investment and check if it has no red trust rating with a very good reputation. You should probably be suspicious if an ICO does not disclosed the team members in which will give you an idea that there is something wrong with that particular ICO.

The project team is a factor in evaluating an ICO. You need to read the whitepaper and look at the products development. These are the core parts of an ICO success.

Knowing ICO, team is a very important aspect in each project because if the team don't have previous experience into managing large financial projects, most likely they can't manage certain ICO project well and it will fail.

Yes I agree with you apart from that we need put effort on our own like researching about the project. Also you can share the information on this forum about the project. If investors lose trust then definitely it will be considered only as a scam project.

It is not necessary because if some one succeeded in a project, it is not mean they can get another successful project. You only need trust yourself and your review, do not spend your money under the reviewing of others.

It's not about necessary or not.
But, it's a must. The team is the core of the project besides the idea.
With professional and experienced team, the porject will be really implemented in the future

Of course, it's very necessary to know the background of the team. Because today, projects that don't want to show their team, will intend to do a scam. That's why if the ICO project wants to succeed then they must be more transparent to investors. If they have many reasons not to reveal who their team is, be aware of fraud.
Some ICO web listings at this time also have a KYC system to verify ICO projects registered on their web to reduce fraud risks to investors and their loyal subscribers.

A strong team behind the ICO gives you probability to conclude projects future, If the ICO not showing the team behind their project then its become very riskier to invest in this kind of projects. Its better to not support projects with Anonymous Teams as there are chances of losses always on the head of investor take example of recent ICO IONCHAIN, The concept of the project was looking promising & a lot investors invested. Later what happened they launched their token on Idex exchange in middle of their Main ICO & were selling their unsold token which they were suppose to burn. Idex exchange team identified their shady activities & immediately DE-listed them but the damage has already happened to investors who invested in the ICOs & as well as to those investors who purchased tokens from the exchange. In this scenario both types of investors can't do anything as the team is anonymous.

Yes reviewing the background of the team is an essential part to be investigated before you tend to invest in any ICO project, as the project is dependent on the team that how much effort they put to make the project successful. And also your funds would be in hand of the team, so make sure the team is legit and won't going to scam or have any sort of intentions to just raise funds and not working on the project, in that case, the token won't be having any value in future & hence your investment will be wasted.

The currency itself is anonymous and decentralised, so their members being behind the curtain would be legit too. But it's not that difficult, if someone needs to find any, they have the scope under some procedures.

It was in 2016 - 2017 when no one needs the details about the developers but as today you can see lot of scams happening so ICO needs to disclose all details about them if they are genuinely developing the real projects.

Better to know the team in real life ;D
It is necessary, sure!
Most of the scum ICOs put a fake team on their websites, so this is the best marker.

 I think there are very few ICOs who do not include the team in it, because a good team is one of the investors who pulls in the ICO, of course because there are so many ICO scams that have sprung up lately, even many ICOs failed because of lack of investors

In fact, downtrend makes people no longer interested in ICO projects and the good development team is going to feel helpless with this. I believe that if you want the project to succeed, then we must have absolute trust in this market and always make the most accurate decisions before investing in any ICO project.

       Yes it is necessary to research thoroughly the white paper and the team behind the project , I have seen a project team with picture , it quiet impressive and it shows the legitimacy of the projet  , and I think it can attract investors .

nowadays it is very difficult to choose a project that is really promising and good for us. even though we have made the most accurate decision it still ends in fraud.

I think not most of ICOs to hide identities of their team members. There are some ICOs showing the team identities, commonly they enclose the link of their linkedin accounts and social media.

If you ask me about "review the team info is necessary or not", I strongly say that it is very necessary. For me, it is the most crucial factor that determine the success of an ICO. A quality of team members will lead to the quality of project management and its ideas + plans of the future achievement.

Note: Never invest in ICOs with unclear or lack information of the teams. It is like putting your money in very risky places. Finally you will get nothing and lose your money forever.      

some scams use photos taken from other project teams. some project that caught the scam also based on team photos and background profiles of the team project. then it is important to examine more thoroughly the team of the project. the issue of the composition of the team make investors come be a part of marketing.

of course public team is necessary. If I invest in a project the first thing I consider is the management team, must have experience or success in the past with other ICO.
and if they are trying to hide members that high ICO rate just wants to scam

of course it's very necessary, the team that works behind a project that is what makes the project will get success. a good job is a job done by the workers in their jobs. It makes the job will work optimally.
I see there are several project team which consisted of just a few people, and it also does not correspond to the areas of its expertise, it's become a question mark for me. be careful that such project is usually a scam.

I believe yes, it is necessary to know about the team behind. We should know and we should have enough knowledge about the team of an ICO that we are joining. We should do series of research about an ICO so that we will not regret anything in the future.

knowing that the team in the project is obviously very necessary, almost all investors who want to invest in a project usually need to know the team behind them first, so that the project can run smoothly. professional teamwork is needed so that projects can develop in the future

Exactly, Team verification before investment is necessary to tackle with fraudulent ICOs. In team verification you can check in brief information about team members like their proffessinal association with organization's and educational details. This brief information is not enough you should also check engagement of community manager, developer and CEO etc this shows their passion about the project to make their project successful. If you found poor presence of the team members in social media community than avoid this kind of projects. Don't invest in project which have anonymous team members and developers as this kind of projects have higher probability of turning out to be scam. Once scam happens you can not take any legal action against them and you will have to bear the losses.

It is vital to know the teram behind the ICO one tries to invest in. It therre is a possibility of scam then the investor can hold the members accountable by prior reviewing of the members.

Knowing the team behind a project is very important. The way scams are increasing, there is always a possibility that people who don't reveal themselves are doing something wrong. Before investing all the things should be made clear.

I think that we need to know about the team members and developers, because only in this way can we really adequately evaluate this or that project.

Of course, it's necessary and is a must also.
How can you be sure about the project even if you are not familiar with the team?
You need to be sure about them before you throw your money to a black hole.

It is mandatory that you check if the persons behind the project say who they say they are and if their credentials are real, I would not have any problem with anonymous developers if they said that from the beginning, but if they try to use the identity of someone else then you know they are scammers.

Every ]nvestors actually should first check the background of the project itself befode engaging into it to avoid complaints from being scammed. It is really a necessary thing to do since many ICO projects are turning out to be a scam afterwards. This is an important thing obviously to lessen the risk of losing money.

There may be other reasons behind the hidden identity of team ICO. but of course, the identity should not be covered up because of course, the identity of the team will be very necessary to be known. This will give you an idea of whether the ICO project held by prang the right or not and it may just be the identity of the team will be a new information whether it is a scam or not.

It is indeed necessary. The team behind the project plays a great role in the project's success. One thing you should also consider is making sure the project can show a minimum viable product. You should check out NeuronChain. We're one of the few projects who developed our product first instead of just making a promise with just a whitepaper. Visit our website here: https://neuronchain.io/

I think this is necessary. There have been incidents in which the same team forged multiple ICOs. Such a team is a typical team of fraudsters, and no one wants to encounter an ICO created by such a team. Therefore, if we are serious enough, we can distinguish between what is a fake project by team members to avoid being deceived.

I would never participate in an ICO if the ICO team was concealed. It is very unusual and dangerous if we invest in it because it can scam at any time. And ICO wants to be successful, there must be a strong team and and information must be public with the community

What year have you officially started then?

There are many projects that started with nothing so that should not be something necessary to determine if you are going to invest in a project or not, what you should do is to try to verify the identity of those behind the project and see if they are real.

I refer to choose a project that displaying their team member as details as possible. with that we could analyze whether the team is real or it's just some fake data to collect some fund and then left.

knowing the identity of the team behind the project is the important thing. background team, team, educational experience that is owned is a consideration that should be known to the team. a good project is certainly a good team also run and owned identity is important to know. Moreover, many of the falsified identity in the project team and is certainly not showing enough team when in doubt.

knowing deeply the profile of ICO project team is mandatory to consider investment decisions, from the team we can find out whether team has good experience or whether team has bad faith in handling a project, or also the team is just a fake team and scammers

After btc the best of them all is eth and has been the great project so far with it contribution towards the success of the blockchain technology development and I believe so much in it that it will make a great impact now and in future for the cryptocurrency.

The team is a very important factor when choosing an ICO because if the project hides the team then it is scammers, and if a successful team then it is a big plus.

of course important advisor developers or IT and marketing fields are essentially seeing good ICO from various aspects as well as from the community of websites and most importantly the project ideas

A good and supportive team is the backbone of a project. If its hidden, you must try to find out about them. If after all the attempts, the project can't project its team, it sure is a scam.

Team is the most important factor of a success of an ICO. Without a good team, it is impossible to raise funds. Moreover, the team is responsible for marketing, product development and many other things. Projects team is extremely important!

I think the marketing team is the most important for a project. If a marketing team does their job well and attracts many partners, that project will surely succeed. Team Dev is also important because it will help everyone evaluate the project in a long term

yes surely it is very necessary. we must know all the background of the project developer team that we want to invest. because currently there are many scam projects that use data or photos of other people to be made into their team, we must be vigilant. one of the benchmark projects is quality is the team, and you have to know that.

Yeah, of course you MUST research carefully about th team behind a project, it is the most important part. A good project must have a strong team that has many years experiences in blockchain, cryptocurrency, the industry they are going to launch their project. Also, through the team you can spot scam ICO because many scam projects use fake team members and you can realize it.

When analyzing the ICO project for possible investments, it is necessary first, to carefully look at the prospects of the product, and second, to check the development team for reality. These are the two main details.

Before investing in any ICO, deep research must be done to know everything about the project which reviewing the team is paramount to know it's composition, check their information on LinkedIn to verify their identity and do background check to avoid getting scammed

Many scam projects use fake pictures for team members. Checking the team members is one of the easiest way to avoid scammers, but keep in mind that the fact that team members are real persons doesn't guarantee anything.

Reviewing of the team member of a potential project is very necessary and is the fundamental part an investors should look for in investing his or her money into. The team public reputation goes a long way for project's vision actualization. If the team refuse to make their team public for everyone to see that project might be a potential scam. Every genuine ico will always make everything transparent.

if an ICO project tries to hide the identity of their team and all the members that involved in, what happens in my opinion is the opposite, it will not attract investors' attention because from the start the ICO was suspicious, so investors would think it would be better to leave something unclear like that. Most ICO scams have such characteristics

According to me, knowing the team of an ICO is important. By knowing the team, we can know their previous project and how it works. It's one of many ways to protect ourselves from the scam. I think a good team will also build a good project.

Yes it is necessary. Its your responsibility to know the companies team behind, who are the people you are trusting with your money.

If you don't have time to check the time then you should stop investing in ICOs because it is necessary to know who are they.

of course everything becomes research starting from the team and developers.
the expertise of the team is a benchmark in the success of an ico project, especially long term. the important thing is products and technology

It is necessary to check the team and the actual product behind them. Most of the ICOs (https://coincodex.com/ico-calendar/) are bullshit which showed when 99% of them failed during the bear market.

first thing when I analize ICO, I look at teamprofiles in LinkedIn. if they have good old profiles with good marks - that is the good sign for the project.

I wouldn't invest in projects where team members are hidden  It's necessary, of course, to consider all aspects of the projects, white paper, MVP and the roadmap, but I don't really understand for what purposes it is necessary to hide the project developers.

I can’t remember coming across any ICO that doesn’t show the members that are behind the project 🤔but if you come across such an ICO then I will advise you not to even think about going for it cause that is scam in a broad daylight lol. And it’s always good to know everything about an ICO, especially the team that are behind and many others before you can decide on whether to invest or not.

Mate no one invest money blindly these days. They cross-check everything like how it can benefit to them, they check their team, development etc. it's already written in our fate like what will happen. Sometimes you research on a coin and you look at their popularity everything and you invest. But in your time if the value goes down no one can do anything, I am not saying you will lose your money. But you have to wait for a long time to get back a good return.

If I see such an ICO I won’t even need anyone to tell me it’s pure scam. How can others show their members and you will be only one that is having members hidden, that means it’s scam and there is no explanation to be made for it. And it’s good to check out an ICO very well before you go for it. There are some of them that shows their members but at the end up it turns out to be a scam.

Knowing the tea  one if the key factor of a good ICO, but it's not a guarantee the project is legit or will succeed.

the identity of the team is to be published to the public. This will become the deciding factor whether projects actually carried out by the right person or not. When the identity of the only hidden or not displayed is certainly becoming a problem that should be questioned visibility.

I wonder if there is anyone in the forum that doesn't understand the importance of researching the developers behind the coin, because the market of icos is full of scammers and I like many people in the forum have wasted my time and money in useless projects and I cannot afford the luxury to do so again.

I am curious about how you review the team? Many projects can bluff and you can't find real developers. This is easy to be deceived. Unless you can reach out to the developer team and get face-to-face with them. Otherwise ICO risks are very high.

Reviewing the ICO project team is the most critical step, because the strength and credibility of the team determines whether the project will succeed!

Lol, team now is probably one of the most important thing in ICO analysis! Now there is a trend for Korean teams, and also if team is famous and well experienced the project is gonna moon!

That’s true. I don’t see any reason why an ICO would hide its team, that’s very suspicious if it’s true, and it should ring a bell to your ears that this is a scam. I have never seen a legit ICO that has hidden their team why on earth would they do that, unless they don’t want people to trust them? ICOs with good teams tends to succeed more than those without a good team.

Professional teams that prepare ICO usually do not hide their data, on the contrary, often people go to the individual and trust them. Therefore, when choosing a project, see the technical documentation, but also plan to collect information about the developers. A quality team will not spoil its reputation.

if they hide their team members identity then you should doubt it. why would they hide? maybe because they hide something bad bad like their team members identity is all fake. even a scam ICOs show their fake team members identity.

the team will be deciding whether the ICO could walk well and not. When it is handled by the best people then great opportunities for the ICO could be successful. When they hide the identity of the team then can become a big question what is it about it? an indication of the scam there is certainly as many suspicions of it.

Actually the Team is one of the factors that investors must know. Why? Because the team on one of the projects affected the size of the believers to invest in their project. If they are behind the scenes, maybe it should be careful. Because investors certainly need to know whether this project is really run by good people or not.

It depends on what kind of investment you want to have. If you want a flip, maybe the team is not the most important thing. In contrast, if you want a long-term investment, analyzing the team is very important.

I have been involved with ICOs since a lot of days, I never saw an ICO project without team members. Scam ICO projects also use someone's profile to claim their team. I don't know where you found an ICO without the team members. Some ICO projects are not like to mention team's list in the official website, you can check their whitepaper, and if their whitepaper hs no team member listed, then avoid that scam ICO. It's easy.