|
Title: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: bittraffic on January 01, 2019, 03:00:16 PM If the team did a bounty campaign already for weeks and postponed the ICO after they see the bear market hasn't yet ended, do you think they are best to wait for the market to get better or just continue the ICO?
If they already have a working product, why not jsut continue the ICO after all, they just need few funds. By the way Lyfe Project collected overwhelming funds in this bear market. Here are list of projects that did it; blackbox WeiDEX BXBET I think they also claimed they do have a working product. Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: xiaoY on January 01, 2019, 03:22:49 PM I think waiting may be a better option. In fact, you will find that even if the ICO developer issues the token to the participant, the price of the token will not be worth the price. I think if all of us can form a Consensus does not sell tokens, and then wait until the arrival of the bull market, which will benefit everyone.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: semobo on January 01, 2019, 03:23:54 PM If the team did a bounty campaign already for weeks and postponed the ICO after they see the bear market hasn't yet ended, do you think they are best to wait for the market to get better or just continue the ICO? They are doing this because of not enough recognization for their project,so they need to continue their bounty until the ICO begins again but sadly no participants will work for that mich longer so they need to pay in already listed coins.If they already have a working product, why not jsut continue the ICO after all, they just need few funds. By the way Lyfe Project collected overwhelming funds in this bear market. Here are list of projects that did it; blackbox WeiDEX BXBET I think they also claimed they do have a working product. Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: passwordnow on January 01, 2019, 03:24:16 PM They can't continue because they think that its not the best time to launch their product. Their major concern is the current market situation which will give big effect if they'll pursue.
I see that weidex before and I thought its going to be huge, so that's the update they stopped? Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: Little Mouse on January 01, 2019, 03:27:02 PM Sr Member Quote from: JayceDesigns
Code: [center][table][tr][td][center][url=https://shuffle.com/][size=2pt][color=#cbf]██████████████████████ Hero - Legendary Member Quote from: JayceDesigns
Code: [center][table][tr][td][center][url=https://shuffle.com/][size=2pt][color=#cbf]██████████████████████ Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: Teraboy on January 01, 2019, 03:38:39 PM If the team did a bounty campaign already for weeks and postponed the ICO after they see the bear market hasn't yet ended, do you think they are best to wait for the market to get better or just continue the ICO? What will be happening if the market will be on the bearish or stable chart until a few years later? They are creating a selfproclaiming that they are having a working product and if that was a real thing and they should not fell worry about that dude. ::) If they already have a working product, why not jsut continue the ICO after all, they just need few funds. By the way Lyfe Project collected overwhelming funds in this bear market. Here are list of projects that did it; blackbox WeiDEX BXBET I think they also claimed they do have a working product. Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: shadowduck on January 02, 2019, 01:57:41 PM I have participated in all these bounty campaigns and I don’t understand will they pay tokens or not. admins in the chats say that everything will be fine
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: bittraffic on January 03, 2019, 05:15:12 AM I have participated in all these bounty campaigns and I don’t understand will they pay tokens or not. admins in the chats say that everything will be fine Participated on BXBET but don't really know whether they are going to be active again in their promotion nor to their ICO to resume. The marketing we did will just be in vane after all these if they just quit saying they change their minds. Weidex so far is busy doing their video promotions, they were planing for IEO. Just another term they use for this ICO. It looks good as they are still up to it butno luck though as I am no part of their bounty program. Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: bitgov on January 03, 2019, 05:21:33 AM I think that it all depends on how much funds they managed to collect - whether they are able to continue the development of the project. Postponing the project for later is very dangerous, because we do not know if the bear market will end in a week or half a year. I think it is a very risky game that can end very badly if the market will stay unstable for several months. But if it really is end of bear market, and prices will stabilize, it can help them to be stronger because of rising value of collected funds in cryptocurrencies.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: Endikadija on January 03, 2019, 05:29:37 AM If the team did a bounty campaign already for weeks and postponed the ICO after they see the bear market hasn't yet ended, do you think they are best to wait for the market to get better or just continue the ICO? If they have a working product and why they must delay their ico? that proves if they are not having any product and they only care about the money. They can't even build something useful to attract the investors. If they already have a working product, why not jsut continue the ICO after all, they just need few funds. By the way Lyfe Project collected overwhelming funds in this bear market. Here are list of projects that did it; blackbox WeiDEX BXBET I think they also claimed they do have a working product. They are crap platforms. They waiting for the market to recover and basically, they are money oriented. Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: disconnectme on January 03, 2019, 05:45:27 AM Do not believe most of these developers when they claim they have a prototype, most of these prototypes do not work. I have seen it over and over again projects postponed they ICO for more than a year looking for the right time to conduct their ICO, but now I don't thing it is issue of time but all about investors confidence and we have seen how ICO starts dumping immediately after they hit the exchange
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: Sevarchik on January 03, 2019, 05:48:06 AM I think is wrong, ICO makers must know what crypto market can change from bull to bear in one hour.
So they accept all risks when want to start project in crypto sphere Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: rahul7timt on January 03, 2019, 05:51:38 AM i think it is better to postponed the project when market is down. i believe if they have working project than also they should hold it till the time market situation is not well.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: anu1908 on January 03, 2019, 05:55:21 AM Forget about those project. It doesn't worth your time to think about. Next time you can choose a project with really strong background and connections. Try to find a project that has VC relations, most of the time they won't postpone any ICO, but their distribution can be very long, months or even nearly a year.
TL;DR, forget about them, move on. Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: KKH84 on January 03, 2019, 06:14:42 AM I think is wrong, ICO makers must know what crypto market can change from bull to bear in one hour. So they accept all risks when want to start project in crypto sphere Yes, I agree with you, if there is a project to delay their ICO because of the current bear market situation and there is no clarity from the development team, I think the project will end in a scam. Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: Akoldi_ibk on January 03, 2019, 06:59:31 AM Postponing ICO till market recovers is not a bad idea. Even some ICOs that successfully reached softcap/hardcap with working product are still in fear of getting listed just because of the downward effect the current market might have on their listing price. The most important thing during the period of postponement is that there should be regular communication between the development team and the community and more of updates on the progress of the team. Marketing and partnership I think should also be intensified. Postponed ICO is not a bad idea. However, if you perceive dead fish in the project, just be ready to move on.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: bitgov on January 03, 2019, 07:20:10 AM i think it is better to postponed the project when market is down. i believe if they have working project than also they should hold it till the time market situation is not well. It is possible that the postponing ICO at the time when prices on the market are on the bottom is a good solution to protect the price of the token from dump after entering the exchange. The problem is that no one knows how long the price bottom will last and whether it will not be worse. Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: Indrawan77 on January 03, 2019, 07:58:03 AM Postponing might be a better idea, the ICO launching need to be on the right timing, when a positive trend is happening on the market it will attract more investors, if you force the launching then the result might be not good, and when the start is not good then it could affect the growth and the reputation
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: antsam on January 03, 2019, 08:09:40 AM I also have followed a number of bounties which postponed the ICO because of market conditions, and some have even finished their ICO but have not opened the market due to current market conditions. I think the developers must have their own calculations by delaying their ICO, so we can only wait patiently
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: warcarft3 on January 03, 2019, 08:09:49 AM I think most projects postpone ICO because they want to raise more money, but I don't think they need very large funds to get the job done.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: cewekimut on January 03, 2019, 08:34:55 AM I am interested in following Lyfe and the project is very good and can quickly raise funds. However, giving the tokens to all Bounty participants was a problem due to very long delays. I think you also have to be patient and I think when it's time for coin shipping, the market price is already very high.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: Saisher on January 03, 2019, 10:29:08 AM If the team did a bounty campaign already for weeks and postponed the ICO after they see the bear market hasn't yet ended, do you think they are best to wait for the market to get better or just continue the ICO? If they already have a working product, why not jsut continue the ICO after all, they just need few funds. By the way Lyfe Project collected overwhelming funds in this bear market. Here are list of projects that did it; blackbox WeiDEX BXBET I think they also claimed they do have a working product. Weidex has a successful ICO and they are waiting for a favorable market, and they are not yet launching their IEO Initial Exchange Offering so it will take some time before bounty hunters get their token truly WEIDEX is working slow but sure on how to make their platform very popular. Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: daniel002 on January 03, 2019, 10:37:30 AM Maybe they are afraid that they can't reach their hard cap if they continue their ICO and not accumulate some funds on this bear market. I would rather postpone the ICO than being called as scam project because of not hitting the soft cap or the hard cap because most coins that have no value after the ICO and goes to an exchange are those who haven't reach the soft cap or hard cap.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: Deagle21 on January 03, 2019, 10:46:53 AM I am interested in following Lyfe and the project is very good and can quickly raise funds. However, giving the tokens to all Bounty participants was a problem due to very long delays. I think you also have to be patient and I think when it's time for coin shipping, the market price is already very high. I really hope for this theory. because since August I took part in about 50 projects and tokens came only from 5. the rest of them constantly postponing the deadlinesTitle: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: longyenthanh on January 03, 2019, 10:55:51 AM Postponing might be a better idea, the ICO launching need to be on the right timing, when a positive trend is happening on the market it will attract more investors, if you force the launching then the result might be not good, and when the start is not good then it could affect the growth and the reputation For many investors (mainly those old school), changing such important decisions and dates may also mean poor preparation of the project and lack of professionalism of the dev team. If once they decided wrong about the start of sales, why the next attempt have to be successful? Most probably this decision can be wrong again.. right? Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: elenka n on January 03, 2019, 12:01:33 PM I think if the project is interesting, then the team obviously will not bet on the ICO and wait until the market is better!
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: Ostonian on January 03, 2019, 12:30:56 PM In 2018, many projects put off fundraising because of a bad market. And because of this, the bounty campaign lasted more than 6 months. In any case, there is cause for concern, but I think that it is enough for the project to collect a soft cap so that the bounty hunters receive tokens.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: AristoteI on January 03, 2019, 12:41:49 PM For different projects in this situation, different behavioral strategies may be appropriate. For projects that feel confident and have a work product, they can do not postpone the ICO and they can do it right now, while others - those who are not so confident in their abilities - it is better for them to transfer ICO to another time.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: eternalgloom on January 03, 2019, 12:58:11 PM Are you really that surprised about this? They have absolutely no legal obligation towards you to pay out any of the bounties anyway.
You agreed to those terms when you signed up for the bounties in the first place. Just out of curiosity, what's the most anyone has ever made, just by doing these sorts of bounties? Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: Mommynigabby on January 03, 2019, 01:09:37 PM If the team did a bounty campaign already for weeks and postponed the ICO after they see the bear market hasn't yet ended, do you think they are best to wait for the market to get better or just continue the ICO? If they already have a working product, why not jsut continue the ICO after all, they just need few funds. By the way Lyfe Project collected overwhelming funds in this bear market. Here are list of projects that did it; blackbox WeiDEX BXBET I think they also claimed they do have a working product. probably waiting for the right timing so as not to compromise the success of their project. Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: ipsec on January 04, 2019, 07:45:10 AM This is a good option for working with ICO projects at this time. If the project has a finished product of course should continue to participate in this bounty program. And you will have a chance to get a good profit. Or lose time and the project will be scam.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: Baofeng on January 04, 2019, 07:52:00 AM I'm not familiar with those ICO but it they are legit then I don't see why they need to postponed it. Investors are smart, if you have a working product then absolutely, someone will invest on it. Yes, there's a lot of projects who thrived in the bear market like WPP or Inifinitus which almost hit their hard cap already. I guess those ICO give up early and don't know how to properly market their product to the right investors.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: adam1230 on January 04, 2019, 07:56:51 AM I usually quit from posponed bounties.
They fails over the time. I worked for OEL and some more but all failed in time. Bear market is not a good timing for bounty hunters we worked for free. Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: Cemploon on January 04, 2019, 08:44:55 AM I personally also in 2018 many projects was postponed. And there are projects that have not been updated until now and I think this project failed. However, like the Lyfe project, it is still in process and at the end of 2018, the project is complete. And the Bounty manager that I saw also did the best to date, and for all Lyfe Bounty participants, I think I should continue to monitor this project.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: owlman on January 04, 2019, 09:15:24 AM In these market conditions, many projects postpone the date of the ICO, but I believe that everything depends on the project, on what strategy they use for their development, as the developers see the further situation. Therefore, do not blame anyone, because all project developers want to do everything in the best possible way.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: Bitbtc8 on January 04, 2019, 09:23:01 AM If softcap is not meet postpone can take place its so normal but after bounty campaign? I'd stay away from such because its already a fail project
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: Levyathan on January 04, 2019, 09:41:25 AM That's because of the people around here are not quite want to invest since the bitcoin is still bearish. That's why they are postponing the ICO.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: sherenikaw on January 04, 2019, 09:47:51 AM Every decision will always include the risks. If they continue the ICO, they may only need the small investors and they should spend more budget for the bounty or airdrop participants. But, if they must stop the ICO, they may also have risks on the trust by the investors and the bounty programs. I also joined a bounty with postponed and it has been more than 5 months waiting, no movement.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: AgentZero23 on January 05, 2019, 06:13:04 PM If they have a working product they should have move forward with the ICO and about their reason with the current market condition. I think it's a lame excuse as some projects always have that reason when the they failed to collect some funds. However, it's true not enough funds means the development of the project and product will be delayed and its not good for the investors and bounty hunters and also to the developers.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: DanWalker on January 05, 2019, 06:19:45 PM If the team did a bounty campaign already for weeks and postponed the ICO after they see the bear market hasn't yet ended, do you think they are best to wait for the market to get better or just continue the ICO? If they already have a working product, why not jsut continue the ICO after all, they just need few funds. By the way Lyfe Project collected overwhelming funds in this bear market. Here are list of projects that did it; blackbox WeiDEX BXBET I think they also claimed they do have a working product. If I'd be in such kind of situation, I'd rather try to find some venture/angel investors. Nobody invests in ICOs nowadays, so there is 99% chance of fail. PS I can't understand the reason why and how new ICO projects pop up)) Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: kliown on January 05, 2019, 11:44:13 PM In their place, if they only recently launched their ICO and collect money in cryptocurrency, then I would not suspend, since the market is now so low, and in six months of ICO (as they now usually last) they will be able to collect a good amount, even a very good one.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: begau on January 09, 2019, 04:15:38 PM ICOS campaigns are taking place when there are unfavorable bear market conditions. Depending on the views of the campaign developers, if they have the financial potential they continue the campaigns but some campaigns without the potential they have to stop because the bad market does not attract investors.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: MendozaCharles on January 09, 2019, 04:17:38 PM I participated in the bounty Eloncity, Bounty ended in August 2018 but until now they still have not started public sale. They claimed to have mobilized 25 million private sale words, but public sale has not yet had a start date, quite questionable for such projects.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: cudora on January 09, 2019, 04:20:05 PM I think the best decision is to participate in those bounties and hope that they would reach the soft cap, because it is an amazing opportunity of how to earn perspective tokens for low prices. Nowadays there are not so much hunters left.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: Argoo on January 09, 2019, 04:58:16 PM Postponing might be a better idea, the ICO launching need to be on the right timing, when a positive trend is happening on the market it will attract more investors, if you force the launching then the result might be not good, and when the start is not good then it could affect the growth and the reputation Postponing an ICO, that is, suspending it until better times in the cryptocurrency market, is not the best option. Investors and even bounty hunters usually begin to doubt such a project. In addition, many unscrupulous ICO teams deliberately suspend their ICOs in order not to pay bounty hunters in the future. Many suspended ICOs do not resume their activities at all. For example, I participated in the ICO VVTokens project, which conducted the ICO in the period from October 2017 to 01/05/2018. ICO was suspended, payment of tokens to bounty hunters was postponed until June 2018. And since then silence.Of course, the situation in each ICO project is different. In some cases, suspension is appropriate, in others - not. Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: airdropcoin on January 10, 2019, 12:12:04 PM Most of the delayed projects have uncertainties, which may make investors too flustered, and investors may sell coins when the coins are listed. But a small number of projects are waiting for a better market, so this is still related to the quality of ICO.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: phuonganhdpa on January 10, 2019, 01:01:16 PM if the market will be on the bearish or stable chart until a few years later, will they stop selling the ICO until that time? I don't think that's a reasonable choice. Because they don't know when the market is better. We may have to wait 10 years, 20 years or permanently. That is terrible for those who have invested
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: idontcare on January 10, 2019, 01:25:09 PM I think the best decision is to participate in those bounties and hope that they would reach the soft cap, because it is an amazing opportunity of how to earn perspective tokens for low prices. Nowadays there are not so much hunters left. I find that today there are not too many hunters as well, the projects given are not necessarily good, and many participants may have other ideas such as other people's scamming, I thought little but it could be good ;) Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: killerfrost on January 10, 2019, 01:34:02 PM I think the best decision is to participate in those bounties and hope that they would reach the soft cap, because it is an amazing opportunity of how to earn perspective tokens for low prices. Nowadays there are not so much hunters left. I find that today there are not too many hunters as well, the projects given are not necessarily good, and many participants may have other ideas such as other people's scamming, I thought little but it could be good ;) Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: plr on January 10, 2019, 01:44:09 PM The alibis are always been the current market condition, I have been into at least 5 postponed ICO and many more ICO following the trend because they are having a hard time convincing investors that they have a good project the bounty hunters are the losers here.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: rickyharun on January 10, 2019, 01:51:10 PM I think the best decision is to participate in those bounties and hope that they would reach the soft cap, because it is an amazing opportunity of how to earn perspective tokens for low prices. Nowadays there are not so much hunters left. I find that today there are not too many hunters as well, the projects given are not necessarily good, and many participants may have other ideas such as other people's scamming, I thought little but it could be good ;) Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: Osayo on January 10, 2019, 01:52:32 PM I think waiting may be a better option. In fact, you will find that even if the ICO developer issues the token to the participant, the price of the token will not be worth the price. I think if all of us can form a Consensus does not sell tokens, and then wait until the arrival of the bull market, which will benefit everyone. I don't agree with you on this. Why waiting? Do you know how long the bear market would last? If the price of Bitcoin does not return to $8k plus, does that means such a project will never be launched? If a project is really good, nothing stops its from continuing with its ICO irrespective of the market. You only need to sell a the prevailing market prices. That's all. Besides, there were ICOs even when Bitcoin was far less than the current price today.Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: Lagduf on January 10, 2019, 04:05:45 PM I think the best decision is to participate in those bounties and hope that they would reach the soft cap, because it is an amazing opportunity of how to earn perspective tokens for low prices. Nowadays there are not so much hunters left. I find that today there are not too many hunters as well, the projects given are not necessarily good, and many participants may have other ideas such as other people's scamming, I thought little but it could be good ;) This can become your another activity to spend your free time. There was a lot of reasons why dev postponed the ico. Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: maculeth on January 11, 2019, 03:51:01 AM still continuing ico is the best way in my opinion. because some of the ico were finished in this bear market situation, they were seriously injured and many participants did not receive their tokens. What's worse, there are some who are scams. this will make the situation worse, it's better to continue the ico again and give an announcement that the end of ico is extended again. in addition to securing their value, but also to get additional funds.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: mbah on January 11, 2019, 04:09:16 AM I think the team just afraid for jobs they have fallen since the bear market occurs. When indeed delayed I don't think this is a good result also to aim at the ICO. waiting for a bear market to a stop and then resume the ICO became the way that was done and despite giving the uncertainty but to save the project may be things anew. But if the team believes whatever he does they can compete and thrive I think there is no reason for the delay.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: glasbren on January 11, 2019, 04:15:01 AM Since we don't really know what will happen to crypto coin in the future, i think continuing the ICO is way better than waiting until the condition getting better, because there will be no fix date when the market will be back again.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: hellyah070 on January 11, 2019, 05:45:45 AM Why do they postpone the ICO? I think the bounty is the one that is dependent on the ICO? Well, the bounty should be the one to be postponed not the ICO itself as the ICO is the main project.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: ElenaN on January 11, 2019, 12:40:04 PM In my opinion, if you do not doubt your product, there is no point in stopping ICO, you need to continue!
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: petrcoin on January 11, 2019, 12:42:00 PM Well, they probably tried to raise some money while bounty was active and they failed so they decided to postpone. Probably that ico never worth anything anytime.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: NakiRR on January 11, 2019, 01:25:19 PM If the team did a bounty campaign already for weeks and postponed the ICO after they see the bear market hasn't yet ended, do you think they are best to wait for the market to get better or just continue the ICO? It is normally i think, that projects that you have mentioned above are too weak to continue their token sales n a bearish market. No one will invest in it with such a high risk to lose his money. And i'm fully agree about ready and working product and don't like too greedy projects the main purpose of which is to collect funds as much as it is possible.If they already have a working product, why not jsut continue the ICO after all, they just need few funds. By the way Lyfe Project collected overwhelming funds in this bear market. Here are list of projects that did it; blackbox WeiDEX BXBET I think they also claimed they do have a working product. Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: Sanford on January 11, 2019, 01:28:47 PM This is not clear to me. If you release a product you will raise money anyway. By giving beta you will collect even more money. I think the developers have become scammers too. Without money, they do not want to do nothing.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: Thanasis on January 11, 2019, 01:34:47 PM If the team did a bounty campaign already for weeks and postponed the ICO after they see the bear market hasn't yet ended, do you think they are best to wait for the market to get better or just continue the ICO? Some of the bounties even continuing without any notices to the participants after pausing or postponed their ICO so we need to work until they resume it.I won't stick to it and I won't care about they are paying rewards for the done weeks,just move and and find better one than waiting for nothing.If they already have a working product, why not jsut continue the ICO after all, they just need few funds. By the way Lyfe Project collected overwhelming funds in this bear market. Here are list of projects that did it; blackbox WeiDEX BXBET I think they also claimed they do have a working product. Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: LordShanken on January 11, 2019, 01:37:16 PM This is not clear to me. If you release a product you will raise money anyway. By giving beta you will collect even more money. I think the developers have become scammers too. Without money, they do not want to do nothing. They do not have to be scammers. If the bounty program was during a big price drops in Q4 last year, they probably collected small amount of funds. They have a choice, or postpone the ICO for a better moment on the market, or return funds to investors and announce that the project has failed. I think that if they put in so much effort till now, it's better to try it in better moment than give up. Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: TrevorS on January 11, 2019, 01:54:49 PM I think that despite what is the trend in the market, if the project has a working product and means, then they should continue ICO with the subsequent entry into the market and the start of work.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: Vektrum on January 16, 2019, 06:21:10 AM If the team did a bounty campaign already for weeks and postponed the ICO after they see the bear market hasn't yet ended, do you think they are best to wait for the market to get better or just continue the ICO? There can be no general recommendations. Virtually every ICO project has its own individual circumstances. We know that it is very difficult to conduct ICO in the current state of the cryptocurrency market. However, more and more ICO teams use this to violate the rights of bounty hunters and not to pay their earned tokens. Therefore, it seems to me that it would be better for the ICO teams to distribute their tokens to the wallets of the participants of the ICO bounty campaign and block their movement for a certain time.If they already have a working product, why not jsut continue the ICO after all, they just need few funds. By the way Lyfe Project collected overwhelming funds in this bear market. Here are list of projects that did it; blackbox WeiDEX BXBET I think they also claimed they do have a working product. Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: darmin on January 16, 2019, 06:28:17 AM see current conditions I think they are just too afraid to take risks. many large projects and even judged well into fall when ICO is complete and certainly many do not dare to do this because of those reasons. then take the risk it is better to wait until the situation improves.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: bassbity on January 16, 2019, 06:40:49 AM They can't continue because they think that its not the best time to launch their product. Their major concern is the current market situation which will give big effect if they'll pursue. Not that weidex launched the exchange but I didn't know about it, was it really stopped?I see that weidex before and I thought its going to be huge, so that's the update they stopped? Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: royalfestus on January 16, 2019, 06:43:35 AM Add raincheck to your list. Another challenging thing is, some already existed but want to get on blockchain. They should have a better valuation for their products and should ask a smaller fund that can be raised in a short time but they still demand for funds that are over the roof. sometimes I think these project are all just exploiting the space to get rich. They dont necessarily need ICO, they should rather do IEO and see how much people can buy
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: overnight03 on January 16, 2019, 06:53:52 AM I also met a lot of projects like that, they said that due to the bear market, it would not be convenient to distribute tokens to the bounty hunters, I hope it will be a good strategy for them.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: jahepahit on January 16, 2019, 06:56:11 AM In my opinion waiting for the market to recover is the right choice because if the market improves they will easily get a lot of funds, and in my opinion those who continue to run the ICO because they do have large investors
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: rachman mahesa on January 16, 2019, 07:15:48 AM In my opinion waiting for the market to recover is the right choice because if the market improves they will easily get a lot of funds, and in my opinion those who continue to run the ICO because they do have large investors Most are indeed the right reasons to wait for the market to recover. And there are also projects that are running after the prize campaign. And the project was a big success. But the exact reason for the delay after the prize campaign actually doesn't matter. Because with the aim of waiting for the market to recover.Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: bittraffic on January 16, 2019, 07:32:33 AM In my opinion waiting for the market to recover is the right choice because if the market improves they will easily get a lot of funds, and in my opinion those who continue to run the ICO because they do have large investors Most are indeed the right reasons to wait for the market to recover. And there are also projects that are running after the prize campaign. And the project was a big success. But the exact reason for the delay after the prize campaign actually doesn't matter. Because with the aim of waiting for the market to recover.Lets say the market will bounce back in two years which most probably what will happen, will they wait til some team creates a similar project with them? Is the market really this low that they didn't get anyone to fund them as I can see no investor had tried to ask for refund. Do you mean to say those investors just shook heads and forget? Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: Ini35 on January 16, 2019, 08:56:47 AM The team of the project understands more what is happening in terms of sales. So they are in the best position to know what will work for them, except they are not professionals.
I took part in a project called PharmaTrust. This project postponed its crowdsale, because its target was to make hardcap. When the sales was later opened, INA short while, the hardcap was met. Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: coinbirds on January 16, 2019, 09:52:20 AM Bear market is a type of a market and it can last for years.
The projects has to adopt to the market and not the opposite. If there is a working product they should continue with found raising. Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: raidarksword on January 16, 2019, 09:58:57 AM Projects that started on bear market last year are ended up delayed or postponed due to the fact that it didn't gathered much funds for a project to resume or continue in the midst the situation that affects the crypto community last year. It's best for a project to continue to gather more funds this start of the year because i believe crypto market is gaining a revival and stabilizing prices in the market is stable for now.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: defoman on January 16, 2019, 10:10:57 AM I believe that it is impossible to stop and we need to continue the ICO. If you have a good idea and a good team, you can attract investors even in the bear market. The projects that you gave in the example and many others are proof of this. The main thing is never to stop and move forward.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: cytpoway121 on January 16, 2019, 10:45:18 AM I think most projects postpone ICO because they want to raise more money, but I don't think they need very large funds to get the job done. That’s where greed comes in, everyone wants to make an extra funds to pocket home And I don’t blame them The bearish market is so huge that even if stellar starts afresh it will dump miserable Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: various on January 16, 2019, 10:51:33 AM I don't think that postponed ico and waiting will work too much. If the product is already ready and suitable for use, you can collect funds even if you are in the bear market.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: daly896 on January 16, 2019, 11:10:38 AM Wow, I heard about all of these projects and what happened with all of them? Are they going to launch ICO later or what?
As far as I remember in blackbox I even got registered in bounty. So I am interested in their futher development Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: thaliaand on January 16, 2019, 11:26:03 AM I don't think that postponed ico and waiting will work too much. If the product is already ready and suitable for use, you can collect funds even if you are in the bear market. I agree with your opinion. If the project already has a product, whether it's a prototype or an MVP, as long as the product has potential and on demand in the market, I think ICO will run smoothly despite the current market conditions. ICO delay may also be one solution when the team sees the progress does not seem to be going well. And here the role of advisors is needed especially for startups. Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: Enzo05 on January 16, 2019, 11:44:16 AM One of the reason maybe they are postponing their ICO is because of lack popularity and maybe even there is already working product it is still need to enhanced . Some ICO's was postponed because they didnt reach the target funds and just decided to return the investment of investors .
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: umar22pk on January 16, 2019, 11:49:41 AM There should be some reasons for postpone ICO; one major reason is bearish market after that possibility of delay from developers.
It can also possible they want to launch the project when market will re bounce, so it’s better to wait. Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: Indrawan77 on January 16, 2019, 11:50:33 AM I don't think that postponed ico and waiting will work too much. If the product is already ready and suitable for use, you can collect funds even if you are in the bear market. It's not that simple to attract investors, most of the investors now are interested in making profit, they don't really care about the project, and in bear market the investors usually more atrractes to buy a strong famous coin, ICO usually wont in their liat, because it will take time to make profit, and there are alot of coins that keep on popping out everyday, sometimes postponing ia the only way the developers could do to avoid huge crash and lack of interest when they launched the product, first impressions is really important in ICO Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: dhiraj0977 on January 16, 2019, 12:13:48 PM Seeing many ICOs suffering many losses after launching, it looks like an ideal option left for any ICO to wait and launch it when market recovers. I think there is nothing wrong in such.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: D3m1r4wanti on January 16, 2019, 12:34:31 PM I am very disappointed with some ICO projects that temporarily suspended their ICO when the prize campaign was finished.
because it will harm the bounty hunters who are waiting for the token distribution they expect. while the distribution is delayed because ICO is delayed. Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: Irvinn on January 20, 2019, 05:54:20 PM Seeing many ICOs suffering many losses after launching, it looks like an ideal option left for any ICO to wait and launch it when market recovers. I think there is nothing wrong in such. I see that many ICO teams use the excuse of a bear market and a difficult period for ICO projects to announce the suspension of ICO, and then simply disappear. There are many cases in this forum where a suspended ICO no longer resumes and bounty hunters did not receive their earned tokens. Of course, situations can be different, but it would be better if the ICO team simultaneously calculates with bounty hunters, even if these tokens are permanently frozen in their wallets.Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: capableuwa1 on January 20, 2019, 06:33:02 PM If the team did a bounty campaign already for weeks and postponed the ICO after they see the bear market hasn't yet ended, do you think they are best to wait for the market to get better or just continue the ICO? This is the stage many of them needs to carefully seek financial advice before embarking on any project weather they have a working product or not. Another illustration is ApolloX who were not able to hit their Softcap or HARDCAP but still trying to look for ways to get the platform working. I hope they succeed in it because this period is not easy in the marketplace...If they already have a working product, why not jsut continue the ICO after all, they just need few funds. By the way Lyfe Project collected overwhelming funds in this bear market. Here are list of projects that did it; blackbox WeiDEX BXBET I think they also claimed they do have a working product. Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: seleme on January 20, 2019, 06:39:50 PM Nowadays many teams behind ICOs prefer to postpone ICO in case of not enough collected money. Bear market cycle is big excuse for this guys and they use this factor for their own advantage. I never hold the tokens of project if there is no proper announcement for this debatable situations.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: owlman on January 20, 2019, 06:51:32 PM If the team did a bounty campaign already for weeks and postponed the ICO after they see the bear market hasn't yet ended, do you think they are best to wait for the market to get better or just continue the ICO? This is the stage many of them needs to carefully seek financial advice before embarking on any project weather they have a working product or not. Another illustration is ApolloX who were not able to hit their Softcap or HARDCAP but still trying to look for ways to get the platform working. I hope they succeed in it because this period is not easy in the marketplace...If they already have a working product, why not jsut continue the ICO after all, they just need few funds. By the way Lyfe Project collected overwhelming funds in this bear market. Here are list of projects that did it; blackbox WeiDEX BXBET I think they also claimed they do have a working product. Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: letyouearn on January 20, 2019, 06:52:45 PM If the team did a bounty campaign already for weeks and postponed the ICO after they see the bear market hasn't yet ended, do you think they are best to wait for the market to get better or just continue the ICO? If they already have a working product, why not jsut continue the ICO after all, they just need few funds. By the way Lyfe Project collected overwhelming funds in this bear market. Here are list of projects that did it; blackbox WeiDEX BXBET I think they also claimed they do have a working product. Trying to collect funds during this bear frenzy is like swimming against the stream. It's possible, but hard as hell. And there is no need to compare the results of ICOs from this period and the ones held in 2017... Teams understand the difference clearly I bet :) Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: Perfect35 on January 20, 2019, 10:31:22 PM Most ICOs that postpone their sales, sometimes still do not meet up with their hardcaps, except for some few ones, who are still developing their product despite stopping the sales
When they have a finished product that is sellable, then investors might have more interest and more will be attracted until the hardcap is attained. In such case, it will even be easier to reach. Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: tabas on January 20, 2019, 10:39:22 PM Good for those projects that has an overwhelming result for making it possible out of this bear market. But for those bounties/projects that stops during this bear market, you understand that its not possible for them to make their run and reach the target cap that they have been planning.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: pixie85 on January 20, 2019, 10:46:16 PM They think that they will be able to get more people interested in the bull market when more people are investing but they are missing an important point. If we are in a bull market well known projects with previous successes will gather most of the new money and people won't be interested in new projects that can fail as much as in the old ones like BTC and ETH that will make them money for sure or many smaller but still less speculative ones like EOS ADA and such.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: givary on January 20, 2019, 10:51:31 PM By looking at unstable market conditions, there will certainly be many projects that experience delays in shipping tokens. And like the LYFE project, tokens will be given every month for 10 months. And this, in my opinion, is a good decision because they want to keep the price of the token stable.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: Quintrix on January 20, 2019, 10:57:03 PM If the team did a bounty campaign already for weeks and postponed the ICO after they see the bear market hasn't yet ended, do you think they are best to wait for the market to get better or just continue the ICO? Your list is very short in the telegram channel on bounties that I've participated in there are a lot of paused ICO and some of them are very popular and good project like IOVO I'm surprised that they paused the market, they have a very credible team and they always go to events to promote their project.If they already have a working product, why not jsut continue the ICO after all, they just need few funds. By the way Lyfe Project collected overwhelming funds in this bear market. Here are list of projects that did it; blackbox WeiDEX BXBET I think they also claimed they do have a working product. Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: chanler on January 20, 2019, 10:59:06 PM So far, there are so many ICO that postponed their projects and we as the bounty hunters only have two ways, following or quit. So far, i have every found some and I commonly will let them quit. Yeah, if I have followed about a month, I will see how the prospect of the bounty campaign. I will decide base don each bounty of ICO. However, so far, quitting from them commonly happen.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: bettercrypto on January 20, 2019, 11:07:47 PM One of the factors that lead to ICO postponement is the slump of year 2018 on all cryptocurrency. The slump has brought atleast 90% drop from 2017. Until now, the hasn't been recovering. If this is happening in the top coins including bitcoin and ethereum, what more on ICO investment.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: ecnalubma on January 20, 2019, 11:32:17 PM Its a very risky decision in their part if they continue their ICO’s despite the bear market situation, even if they have a working product it does not guarantee that they can be funded. I seldomly join long campaigns with unclear timelines, ICO’s should be ready no matter what the current situation is its not about the market what matters is what product they offer in the space.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: dabenko on January 20, 2019, 11:37:59 PM The rate at which projects succeed when compared to each other, is quite different.
Some projects take more time, because they may not have adequate connections with investors who would come and invest in the project. I have done some bounty whose ICOs were postponed and at the end, they succeeded. So sometimes, patience is needed. Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: cryptolove.143 on January 25, 2019, 08:35:52 AM You really can't blame the project that cancels their ICO during this bear market.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: ArtemSergeevich on January 25, 2019, 08:38:59 AM I do not trust those projects that put off the ICO, as they had to prepare in advance for bad times and think through their development in a bear market. No one knows when it will end and we must act in reality.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: yrrehc16 on January 25, 2019, 08:39:51 AM It is alway on the team decision wether to continue and postponed the ICO.
But that is the big question also, even it is on the bear market why they need to postpone the ICO if they know that their project is good? This makes me think that the ICO team are just into money in the market and not with the success of the project. Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: papagravel on January 25, 2019, 08:25:09 PM If the team did a bounty campaign already for weeks and postponed the ICO after they see the bear market hasn't yet ended, do you think they are best to wait for the market to get better or just continue the ICO? If they already have a working product, why not jsut continue the ICO after all, they just need few funds. By the way Lyfe Project collected overwhelming funds in this bear market. Here are list of projects that did it; blackbox WeiDEX BXBET I think they also claimed they do have a working product. The developers see that many promising projects raise little money and they are afraid to carry out their ICO. However, I am sure that if the project has a good working model and a good chance to bring profit to investors, then it will definitely collect the necessary investments. Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: bohboh on January 25, 2019, 08:59:59 PM I really don't think its a nice idea to end the ICO because of bear market, my opinion is that, if the project is real and they have good concept, people will definitely buy from their ico and its will definitely succeed during bear market.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: fathur01 on January 25, 2019, 11:36:09 PM I think it is better to continue the ICO, as the market will fall even lower and everyone expects it, and if it falls even lower, then many will leave the crypto-currencies. And do not say that it will be on the contrary tempting offer to buy more, as the news background will also contribute to panic and sale!
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: GymClassHeroes on January 25, 2019, 11:42:28 PM If a project claims they were able to raise enough cash from ICO and were able to build a working product,I really do not see the need to keep investors waiting.First,no one can tell when the bear market will end,secondly,they already got the go ahead from investors who saw some good in their oroject and decided to invest
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: pedpedped101 on January 25, 2019, 11:49:28 PM I am sure that most of those projects did not plan well before starting. At least, that would have created enough awareness and investors would have been waiting for them to lunch.
Sometimes, it can be very painful, one just have to take it as one of those things. Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: marcbitcoins on January 25, 2019, 11:57:21 PM This is commonly happening now in this bearish market in which at first they expect much investments so that their project will be successfully implemented but if they failed to attract people to invest then they should extend it or postponed it as they need much money to pay the expenses of the project. To postponed is better than a scam project in which bounty hardworked is wasted.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: CryptoTech_ on January 26, 2019, 03:32:59 AM You need to add one more project, Buddy postponed the ICO after the Bounty was finished for a long time and until now there has been no clarity about the ICO, and investors have begun to lose confidence, can be seen from the telegram group whose members are getting smaller
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: bitcoin31 on January 26, 2019, 03:36:06 AM So sad because you waste your time. After the bounty the ICO postponed maybe not continue.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: nutildah on January 26, 2019, 03:36:19 AM As bounty hunters you have very little if any power of the control of an ICO. Nobody really cares about your opinions because they realize you are just spambots that use human brains. Frankly I don't know why ICOs continue to use "bounty hunters" -- a far more glorious name for spamming a forum or social media than it deserves.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: Altero on January 26, 2019, 03:46:28 AM As bounty hunters you have very little if any power of the control of an ICO. Nobody really cares about your opinions because they realize you are just spambots that use human brains. Frankly I don't know why ICOs continue to use "bounty hunters" -- a far more glorious name for spamming a forum or social media than it deserves. I'll do respect your opinion and hows you appreciate the way bounty hunters work for. Yes we can deny many of them didn't do their job well and so they tried to cheat the game just for the seek of having big rewards in the end but some of them are religiously did it. Some postponement of ICO due to the market condition and they can't generate money for the support of their project. It sad it end up with nothing for the promoters and considered as a scam. Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: Muzika on January 26, 2019, 04:02:51 AM So sad because you waste your time. After the bounty the ICO postponed maybe not continue. If the ICO conduct a bounty campaign before their ICO starts and it will postponed during the public sale most likely the campaign will end to a scam project, because the most critical part of a campaign is during the public sale they should still conducting a campaign to introduce their product to the people. Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: Sarisang on January 26, 2019, 04:06:56 AM they expect the best results from the ICO. Learn and see many of the ICO are falling because of the crypto red seems to be a serious consideration for the team. Yet this is certainly also a disservice to the participants of the bounty as they will long enough get paid from the results of their work.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: Pffrt on January 26, 2019, 04:12:47 AM I think postponed is a good idea because the market is not so good and it may lead a good project to bad one. By the way, like as you said if they have a working product, I think it would be better to launch because some other ay come up with the same in the market.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: libert19 on January 26, 2019, 04:24:56 AM These ICOs should either start bounty campaigns after minimum funds are raised or bounty hunters should choose projects where project is going to continue.
Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: Caladonian on January 26, 2019, 04:35:19 AM These ICOs should either start bounty campaigns after minimum funds are raised or bounty hunters should choose projects where project is going to continue. Following you with your concept, it's best for the project to start bounty campaign when they already gained enough money to fund the project's development, this bounty will serve an additional promotions and give a little slice of allocated funds as any business needs to have advertisementand promotions, good project won't cancel the process if they are certain that the development will continue and the usage will be huge to their target market. Title: Re: Postponed ICO after bounty campaign Post by: Jrfranco on January 26, 2019, 11:39:39 PM If the team did a bounty campaign already for weeks and postponed the ICO after they see the bear market hasn't yet ended, do you think they are best to wait for the market to get better or just continue the ICO? If they already have a working product, why not jsut continue the ICO after all, they just need few funds. By the way Lyfe Project collected overwhelming funds in this bear market. Here are list of projects that did it; blackbox WeiDEX BXBET I think they also claimed they do have a working product. I am actively participating in some other bounty projects, and i encountered this case, after the bounty program they postponed the public ICO because as they said, the market condition is not favorable to do the selling of tokens,. i think its a good idea maybe, because they can protect themselves and also the funds from the investors i think. |