Bitcoin Forum

When are you going to delete your false accusations that i'm an alt of QS.I guess after a year its evidence enough that everyone see's that i'm not an old of QS.
Do you have issues recognizing that ?

.
Also you just proofed what a scamback you are.


Sending you a message with the request to remove the false accusation you gave me another one which you didn't do before.
You just copy paste an old one from somebody else.

It just shows what a poor human garbage you are

1) He does not have to do anything.
2) He is not DT.
3) Wrong section.

---

/thread

Not now, but he will be once the H8bussesNbicycles conspirators (which Thule is one of) succeed in overthrowing you. @Thule, did you actually bother to look at that trust list before you started using it? ::)

I did wonder why he was complaining about that one specific non-DT red trust and not the 10 or so DT ones he has. Turns out that Timelord2067's is the only one Thule can see because he has Timelord2067 on his trust list, and it seems he doesn't even realise what that means.

This "union of conspirators" gets more hilarious by the day.

This has been basically the Meta & Reputation sections the last few days/weeks:

https://i.imgur.com/oQWuLfU.png

---

Note: This is not my creation; posted with persmission. :)

Did you say you'd promote Quark and get it on the reddit front page? Did that happen?
What work did you acutally do to justify keeping the Quarks sent to you in good faith.

Wouldn't returning the 10,000 Quarks (perhaps 1000 more!) be the right thing to do?

It is tough being labelled a Dalek (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dalek) by a Timelord. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_Lord)

I see they have already conspired to move the thread from meta to reputation to prevent time from being subverted.

Cryptohunter and the rest of the gang can only aspire to trisomy 21. 

While we're at it, and a little bit off-topic, but where are all the Rambotnic defenders now?  He's getting harrassed to death in multiple threads by them g'dawful DT ganger-bangers.  I really am dying to hear scunterhunter drop in to lend some help with an enormous Mexican Trump WoT.  Could it actually be that the only members actually concerned with busting scammers are some DT members (and a few others)?  Nah, couldn't be.

You are aware that 10.000 quarks are $25 ?
And yes i did said it with the execption that i will instantly stop if one of the known scammers would return.
Since they returned i'm not going to promote a coin which in my opinion is still in their hands so they can scam people.
And seeing that quark have been delisted everywhere approves my decission.
But if you wanna talk we can talk about digitalindustry and his team one of the biggest scammers on bitcointalk which have been hunted by me cryptohunter and some other people.
Maybe the current DT members could learn something about catching real scammers

Guys, I'm flattered - I really am.  You're stressing out and I'm not even on the DT.

I'd love to give a few of you merits for your comedy posts, but again I'm not on the merit-go-round...

Not exactly in answer to the OP, but if you all head over yonder: (Archive (http://First thread started by quickseller (and Thule says he isn't QS  Roll Eyes )))

Pay it forward.  ;)

What is Huge Black Woman bumbling on about now? busting scammers lol - please get real. You support liars and scammers always have done ever since you were a darkcoin lover after being made aware of the full facts of that scam launch and their subsequent greedy and dishonest actions.

I have busted open single scams and lying devs  that dwarf every scam you and these fools ever busted together and more. FACT
Most of this bunch never leave meta. I am an alt board only poster until recently and have witnessed and fought the real scams the ones that have a ton of support and backing and full communities on this board to defend their actions. Not a couple of 3rd world scammers trying to fleece a few btc here and there from risk taking fools. Hence why I am very familiar with dealing with huge groups of opponents and never once flinch away from them.

I am on my vacation. I can't get embroiled in every instance of scamming or trust abuse. There is a union building here for those that are honestly being abused. If he is being abused for real he should come here and detail his case for others here to look over and investigate. I will have a look when finished with my vacation. I mean you red trusted him right so what difference does it make what I say anyway. Because if one red trusts most of the others will so until there is enough pressure to reverse trust abuse it is not really worth worrying about a bit of red right now.

If he is innocent and can prove it or there is very little evidence to suggest he did anything wrong, he can come here and join us, if he is guilty or there is very compelling evidence then he needs to stay away. This is a union for clear trust abuse not to defend untrustworthy people.

I hope this group will agree with me that we can not include persons here that look doubtful because it will spoil it here for those that have been trust abused. They only need to find a couple of real scammers in this group that we end up defending those specific instances of red to cast doubt over us all.

That was all of topic but answering HBW anyway.

Re timelord -- I have not really come across this person timelord  (probably not an alt board poster) all that much in the past ( to my memory), but if he has accused thule of being QS and red trust him with no evidence to support that then that is simply trust abuse in my opinion and should be reduced to neutral (max) as a suspicion only which is all it is as far as I know.

Done - thanks for that!

I have no doubt that both QS has alts and Thule has alts. But Thule and QS have very different writing styles.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg49589324#msg49589324  ::)

I already posted before i have an alt from 2012 where i lost the details and thats why i created this account.
I have no other accounts even i have been accused of diffrent accounts like QS,cryptohunter and all the smaller accounts which took activly part in threads i participated.

Maybe you don't have realised it but i don't wear signatures,have no buy or sell thread or anything like that.
I make no income from that forum.So any alt would be no use for me.

Oh don't be shy. How's your ITO marketing business going? Rumor has it that you have two large customers.

What are you talking about ?The next false claim from you ?
I'm a dev and not a marketer even i have the same kind of knowledge like most marketers do.

Today's monetary value of 10,000 QRK is of no consequence, this is about returning what was paid to you to do a job.
You really could accuse anyone of being a scammer to try and justify not honouring a contract, how convenient for you.
Didn't another poster send you a further 1,000?
Quark is listed on many exchanges, you might want to check the daily volumes on AEX.
You seem obsessed with scammers, I wonder why??

I am certain that Thule is not Quickseller.

Quickseller has quite an eloquent grasp of the English language. Thule speaks English as a second language and has quite a distinctive writing style.



Just a sample of many regular errors made by Thule that are not made by QS.

Thule asked Cryptohunter if he could use the same signature. It was in one of the threads I read.

No no other member sent to me 1000 quark.
And no this wasn't paid for doing a job.
If you would at least spent some time and read that old forum if it still exists you would see i was holding at that time quarks from 2013 or 2014 and offered my help for free since some high reputated member convinced me that all the scammers are gone (there was a big debate about it between me and them) and there is only the community left which is trying to get that coin back on track.
I offered my help for free asking only for the cost of servers and proxies and also instantly made it clear should i see a scammer getting back active on Quark i will instantly leave.
Server and proxies have been bought and what happened is that digitalindustry came back who scammed houndred of thousand USD or even millions and who always coworked with Max doing this scam on diffrent coins.
The reputated members guaranteed me that Max isnt working with digitanindustry anymore and that he claimed himself that working with him was a big mistake.
Everything was a poor lie to get the community back and increase the demand via fake update promises like they did always.
As soon as i saw digitalindustry being back i instantly knew its the same scam they did twice on quark before and i left.
I clearly said why i'm leaving and all the crooks jumping on me attacking how i could attack Max and calling him a scammer left themself 6-12 months later seeing there is not a single progress at all.
The only legit guys on Quark were cryptohunter who was way more positiv on Quark than myself and we always had hard debates about it in the past and the chinese investor who tried to take control over it.

But you know what ?Max has the only control over it and he is not willing to give it away.How do i know it ?Because the dev's who worked on the masternodes contacted me asking about my honest opinions and informing me about everything what is going on internal even i didn't wanted to know it.
The masternodes for Quark were a long time ready to be implemented.The dev contacted me upset saying that Max would not allow the implementation of the masternodes even they have been successfull tested
but wanted to switch to something else.If i remember it correctly using masternodes of Dash.

So if i see punks like you accusing me of scamming where it was me and some high ranked members on this board who actually exposed that scam back in 2012/13 where Bill Still got bribed,a big marketing campaign has been bought by digitalindustry and everyone waiting for Max Kaiser where these same scumback dumped coins and stoll all peoples money when Quark was on CMC #3 than i'm asking what is wrong with you ?
Pissed that you lost all your money on quark ?
Before leaving quark i mentioned it many times to people to leave quark as its going to die and i had right a second time.
Back in 2013 i was also attacked for being a bankster,psyop etc when warning about Quark and these scammers.
Not many listened but these who listened sent me PM's thanking to make them aware of it so they started digging deeper.


So if you punk wanna accuse me of not helping promoting a coin where people would have lost all their money you can go on.
Since from my leaving many years passed at least show me a single update Max made during these years ?
Didn't you guys promoted that major updates is going to be released soon during the time i left and even had to create a new self moderated thread for quark so you could delete all negative comments?

Ladies, you're off topic...

I'm going to have to ask you to either leave the thread, or lock the topic if you can't focus on the shinny bauble in front of you...

Reposted for xtraelv's benefit:

[quote author=Timelord2067 link=topic=2544574.msg49589742#msg49589742 date=1549332033]
[quote author=Thule link=topic=2544574.msg49589397#msg49589397 date=1549328602]
You just proofed earlier you don't care about trust abuse as you gave me already a negative tagg for being an alt of QS where you of course have no evidence.
[/quote]

...and *this* is what all the Butt Hurt ^TM is all about:


I'd hate to see how stinging Thule's squeeling would be if I actually said s/he *was* an alt of QS  ::)
[/quote]

---

Just to be clear - I didn't say Thule was quickseller... (remind me why you're on the DT list again?)

You gave me a negative tagg and clearly said you give a fuck.
If you don't know if i'm QS you had no right to give a negative tagg.You could add a neutral but without even the simplest proof that would be even invalid....
How does it come that you have no proof of me being QS and giving a negative rating and at the same time give to a known account which should be sold to shitposters but landed to suchmoon just a neutral ?

At least i should thank you since you were the only one tagging that account as everybody else didn't even tagged that sold account

[quote author=Thule link=topic=5105851.msg49600949#msg49600949 date=1549393672]
(snip)

and clearly said you give a fuck.

(snip)
[/quote]

When did I say I give a fuck?

Anyway - read this then lock the thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.msg49600801#msg49600801

https://talkimg.com/images/2023/05/17/blob8687166ccc75c9a6.jpeg

Glass Houses and all that...

I haven't seen you removing your false negative taggs.
My taggs are more than valid for your false tagging and clear abuse.
I sent you a PM asking to remove after a year this nonsense red tagg or provide some proof i have any relation to Quickseller.
Your answer was a second negative tagg which theymos clearly stated was not appropiate.

[quote author=Thule link=topic=5105851.msg49606765#msg49606765 date=1549437993]
[quote author=Timelord2067 link=topic=5105851.msg49604530#msg49604530 date=1549419623]
Glass Houses and all that...
[/quote]

I haven't seen you removing your false negative taggs.
My taggs are more than valid for your false tagging and clear abuse.
I sent you a PM asking to remove after a year this nonsense red tagg or provide some proof i have any relation to Quickseller.
Your answer was a second negative tagg which theymos clearly stated was not appropiate.
[/quote]

None of my tags for you are false.  I don't trust you.

I gave my reasoning for why I don't trust you.

Your behavior since makes me trust you less.

How can I change my trust of you to "not negative" when your own behavior feels it is warranted to post such gems as this:


You are in effect wanting me to trust you.  I cannot do that.

---

Food for thought:

[quote author=LoyceV link=topic=5095156.msg49608196#msg49608196 date=1549445496]
Let me quote this for attention:
[quote author=theymos link=topic=5095156.msg49140832#msg49140832 date=1547057006]
All that being said, I still discourage retaliatory ratings, and with these changes I encourage people to try to "bury the hatchet" and de-escalate rather than trying to use any increased retaliatory power you now have.[/quote]
[quote author=theymos link=topic=5095156.msg49600801#msg49600801 date=1549393068]
 - You should be willing to forgive past mistakes if the person seems unlikely to do it again.[/quote]
It seems to me the opposite is happening since the DT-changes.
[/quote]

You are clearly showing your hipocracy.


You tagged me for being Quickseller.
What has that to do with trust ?You have been tagged by me for abuse of false claims without the smallest proof.I guess everyone knows that i'm not Quickseller and still you uphold your negative tagg that i'm quickseller without being able to show a single hint that this could be true and refuse to delete it.
You claimed you tagg alts only neutral.How does it come i got a negative ?I could tell you why because it was a false tagg you were aware of to defame me and you didn't care if i'm an alt of QS or not.It was just used to justify your negative tagg.
Thats also the reason why you refuse to take that tagg away.


When i PM'ed you asking to take that tagg away after a year where its clear that i have no relation to Quickseller your response was an additional tagg for something which Theymos yesterday clearly said was no valid reason to tagg anybody.

I tagged you for tagging without a real reason and more important you just copy pasted old taggs.

You are clearly tagging because of your ego and not based on evidence.

You could accuse me of retaliatory if your taggs would be valid.
But since you can't even show a single hint that i have any relation to Quickseller and your second tagg clearly was a response to my PM and tagging for something what theymos said is not something to be allowed to tagg i'm asking you again.Who is causing these false taggins ?

I think this is relevant:

Yup, and you have put me on your negative DT trust list (Archive (http://archive.fo/53Sxy#selection-9.1017028-9.1017041)) because I first asked, then banned you from posting in my Cryptopia online article list (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5097916.0) when you and and another user decided it would be ok to have an off topic arguement that was not relevant to the thread.

Clearly that's trust abuse. (by you)

Read my responce to theymos here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.msg49604562#msg49604562

So you are absolutely sure no one else sent you 1,000 QRK?
The issue is not the old forum and what happened way back then.  It's irrelevent to the new development.
DI hasn't returned.
The new thread was set up by max.
The issue is you being sent 10,000 QRK to perform a task.  Due to your own doubts/paranoia/conspiracy theories you decided not to do this.
I don't have an issue with this, you're completely entitled to change your mind as far as I'm concerned.
But it's only right you return said payment to the new dev who wasn't even around way back in 13/14.  That's the normal thing to do.  He sent them to you in good faith.
Where did you get your moral sense from, a car crash?


To Timelord2067, surely this is completely on topic as it's about trust and scammers

You are a complete idiot knowing nothing about Max.Max has from beginning the control over Quark.Quark is a clone of a russian crypto which had no success.Digitalindustry and Max worked very closly at that time.
And claiming that digitalindustry didn't returned is a blatant lie.It just needs checking the forum and everyone can see themself he returned.
You are an idiot beliving of a new start with Max.You know how many years Max claims to release a major update ?Since 2013 .I haven't seen a single one in 6 years.
I have spoken with the dev's who worked on the masternodes and all left Quark claiming they got scammed by Max.

So before you dumbfuck make any accusation first learn the history of that coin.
And i will repeat it a last time.I didn't get paid for a task you dumbfuck i got funds for servers and proxies and nothing more.
The deal was clear should i see any sign of scammers being on Quark i will leave.

Instead of posting your nonsense i would recommend making a proper research on Max and how many coins he is running on this forum as quark is only a single one from many.

Here just for you a screenshots of 2 PM of your main dev who worked on Quark

https://i.imgur.com/H5rJYr7.jpg

And should you still have not realised it.Max is no dev.He knows some basic's but is totaly unable to make any updates on Quark.

And you know what....since you are such a smartass maybe ask Max for his identity and why he is hiding it for over 7 years.

I disagree that it was off topic. You discussed the topic in your first post. You also didn't first ask (show me where you first asked) and then "banned me" (not that you have that authority) because you disagreed with my personal opinion. (You had the last response which according to you is off-topic).

Also local rules don't apply to that thread because you did not follow the protocol for local rules to apply and it was not a self moderated thread. I stopped posting there because I did not want conflict.


Nope. It talks about trust rating - not trust list.Two completely different things.

Trust rating is where you place feedback.

Trust list is where you trust someone, don't have them listed or distrust someone.

In terms of trading I have no issue with you .

The trust list determines which trust feedback is visible to me - My opinion is that you make lots of assumptions with your "investigations" that are inaccurate and that I disagree with the feedback that you leave. Which would be visible to me if I did not exclude you.

Trust rating criteria:
https://i.imgur.com/TTnr7c7.png

Trust list criteria:
https://i.imgur.com/cNUEjrl.png

Unsound mind.
Unsavoury character.

Friends.

Background: For those of you who aren't aware Thule attempted a "sting" operation against Suchmoon in a separate thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106712.0) (Archive (http://archive.fo/Kwn6n))

---

In that thread I post this: (This summarizes where we are at)

(Post (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106712.msg49685557#msg49685557))


Thule wants me to retroactively {2} remove my trust wall comments - as stated in previous posts in this thread I will not do that - I do not trust Thule and their actions over the last week have proven why I should not trust Thule.

I am posting this on Thule's Trust Wall as a warning to others: *edit* well, I would have, but it's "too long"

To summarize:

I suggested Thule might be quickseller in a Trust Wall post.

Twelve months later I am for a brief moment on the DT then it is taken away.  Thule then starts a thread to place my good name under a cloud.

In the ensuing discussion Suchmoon and The Pharmacist say they are going to review my Red Trusts to see where I may have gotten wrong assertions that various UID's are alts.

Thule then switches their attention to Suchmoon.

quickseller is well known for pushing it's (name) alts under the bus when the alt is no longer of use.

Bizarrely, quickseller firsts contradicts Thule's assertions then increasingly supports Thule's assertions.

The image Thule has used for their "sting" operation against Suchmoon has over the last 24 hours been proven to be a hoax.

Thule has been online but has not come into the thread to dispute the assertion the image is a fake.

I doubt we will see Thule back except to troll.

Archive: http://archive.fo/Kwn6n (all seven pages of Thule's sting against Suchmoon)

Archive: http://archive.fo/KnUiK my "24 hours later" post

Archive: http://archive.fo/kd4B7 (this thread)

---

{2}

Thule quotes theymos' recent edit concerning trust wall negative trusts demanding I remove my posts as Thule has deemed them to be retaliatory, however (1) theymos did not make their edit retroactive (2) Thule has not removed their own retalitory trust wall posts against me (3) I do not trust Thule.

Off Topic

I'm not from DT1, but I added you to my trust list. your contribution to the forum has always been very good

Thank-you for your support, I do appreciate it.

First of all, I would like to thank you for noticing my elegance.

You are correct, I am not Thule. I do not use any alt accounts, and have not for quite some time now, except for one known alt very occasionally. I do however appear to owe quite a lot of people a lot of back rent, as it seems I am living in many people's heads.

When I was reading H8bussesNbicycles' thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103988.0), I was speculating he was intentionally using very poor english in order to hide his "main" account, which I assumed has decent reputation. Without knowing with certainty he is reputable, I cannot support him, and his specific methods of achieving his cause.

Timelord2067 seems to piece together a lot of irrelevant information and come to conclusions not based on logic. I would suggest to ignore his trust ratings, but it seems that many already disagree with that as he is on some trust lists.

Don't worry I will see you are correctly and rightfully distrusted ~ because you are a proven trust abusing dumb fuck. Theymos just told you that red trust is for scammers and scams. You are proven untrustworthy but intentionally abusing the system for your own ends.

First of all Timeload is a big liar,ass licker and most important somebody who seeks retribution.




His claims i attacked him for being near DT1.To say the truth i give a shit about it.
The truth is i sent Timeloard after 12 months of having his false tagg being accused that i'm an alt of Quickseller a PM asking to remove that false tagg since he even admited in public knowing now that i'm not Quickseller.I offered him removing my tagg on him for giving false negative taggs (also please notice timelord is in any other situation of an alt account only tagging neutral.I'm the choosen one to get a negative for being accused of an alt of Quickseller.Of course it was a retribution negative trust and the feedback was just given to not make it look like retribution.
His response via PM was "Golly gosh" with a link to an image showing he added me a new negative trust.
Somebody wanna claim it was not retribution ?Of course he didn't canceled even the first one so i got now 2 negative trusts.
Because of that behavior i opened that thread against him.

He is now trying everything to explain his abuse since he is trying now very hard to enter DT as he admitted himself.He even started posting lies like i was posting on his threads where he needed to ask me to stop which is a blatant lie.I give a fuck about that punk since he is a nobody with a big attitude issue.
When i will have some more time i will add screenshots with all his lies,abuse and retibution he is spreading here in hope to get to DT.

Timeloard is an abuser who posted a lot of false feedbacks and is even unwilling to remove them even when admitting he knows these claims are false.
He is now trying everything to discredit this case so it won't hurt his candidatur into DT.

This weekend when i will have more time full details including screenshot will be provided.

timelord2067 from bitcointalk.org - untrustworthy trust abuser saying " placing my good name under a clound" lol this guy just keeps throwing his dirty name under a bus. He can not stop abusing the trust system on hunches and because he does not share the opinion of others that present observable events he wants to remain hidden.

his forum Timelord2067.com  is also to be treated with extreme caution... who knows what nasty virus or trojans lurk there.

Archived for future reference: http://archive.fo/SXy7u

Can you archive it again because I forgot to be specific with your forum address

which is

Timelord2067.com

I feel it appropriate to warn persons that you abuse the trust system here and are therefore untrustworthy. Therefore all services and websites associated with the Timelord2067  account here need to be treated with extreme caution as you incorrectly suggest my account should

It may not have virus, phishing links and trojans at this point but who knows in the future what someone untrustworthy could place there. Caution is advised.

Since Timelord tried to exclude me from the discussion on his thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5097916.msg49465508#msg49465508) I've done a bit of research.

While I am still getting used to the reality that I have probably lost funds due to the Cryptopia hack I was wondering why he was so keen to shut down my posts on his thread - even to the extent of leaving trust feedback.

https://i.imgur.com/mKW527m.png


(Bold = my emphasis)

https://archive.fo/qgIGn

I have a few questions for Timelord2067

Are you an official from sexcoin ?

When did sexcoin find out that their blockchain was exploited on 14 August 2018 ?

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/sxc/address.dws?SDheavoF8rnJu5hkitK8qzZ3mKXF7mfo3C.htm
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/sxc/address.dws?zTCqPXceNmY5BAFcdm3ojpXeJYs67nbG3.htm
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/sxc/address.dws?Ry9zadfyV8qzmnkc49tVMBisVa59rFo8Fd.htm

https://i.imgur.com/yW15S6P.png
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/sxc/orphans.dws

How did they find out and what action did they take ?

Did sexcoin compensate affected users ?

How much was stolen and when did they report it ?

When (date) did sexcoin inform the authorities (who) that their chain had been exploited resulting in theft of funds ?

What have they done to assist the authorities to attempt to recover those funds ?

When did they inform the community and warn the users that the coin blockchain was exploited and now contains transactions created by a malicious party that stole funds and orphaned blocks from honest miners ?

Why did they not mention that their chain had been exploited (a number of times)  when they forked ?

https://i.imgur.com/4xRqThv.png
https://sexcoin.info/
https://archive.fo/b4TVy


How does a double spend 51% attack work ? Explanation and examples. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5035336.0)

sexcoin ????


LOL thats the quality he represents ?Since 2015 online and done nothing.
A dead coin

It appears timelord is more interested in making personal attacks than getting into his tardis and answering accusations made  about events that occurred last year and what appears to have been hidden from the community.

 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5105851.msg49797331#msg49797331almost a week ago.[/url)


I'm sure all these comments attacking me were warranted considering nixon99 is a CONFIRMED sold account purchased from a hacker that I was exposing in that thread.


EDIT:

https://web.archive.org/web/20190608110849/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4736673.msg51393139
http://archive.fo/ZRfs9


Not all coins hid it from their community. I am also not aware of all the 51% attacks. There are other coin devs that I don't trust. There are also coin devs that are not on bitcointalk.

Again - you are claiming something that I can prove to be a lie.



1) From your statement I can only deduct that you think that you believe that cryptoaeronet is NOT a criminal. Perhaps you can clarify that. Since I outlined all the evidence proving that he IS a criminal here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4509326.msg40796494#msg40796494  That link is is listed as part of the feedback. So you are either stupid or you think he is not a criminal. I take exception with that so make sure you very clearly state your position.

Are you stating that cryptoaeronet is NOT a criminal ?

2) My issues with Leocoin goes back many years. It is an MLM scam. I have pages of proof that make it in my opinion a scam. The Leocoin foundation filed certified documents stating that it has never traded...yet ...claims to be around for a long time... Have you seen the court documents alleging multi million dollar fraud ? Do you realise that the founder is facing court action and on a "no fly list" in Pakistan ?

Are you seriously defending Leocoin ?

3) Oralie9 is a an alt of a permabanned account which was proven. Again all the information is contained in the link that forms part of the feedback.


https://i.imgur.com/GtnL8jO.png

Both accounts used the same social media account names - while claimning to be a "friend" of the account.

Are you defending alt accounts of banned accounts ?

The hole you are digging is getting bigger. Sticking up for scammers to attack me ....wow.