Bitcoin Forum

Investors and bounty hunters are the one losing here, lots of projects that accumulated millions of dollars are worthless when they hit the market, no volume and price is down by 1000% if those coming ICO will not do buyback and the market continues to be bearish then it's all over for ICO and bounty hunters..

Your thoughts on this.?

What do you mean buyback mechanism? I think market is just dropping its price for their currency in order to get what they wanted, not allowing investors and bounty hunters to gain profit to it, in other words, scam people out of their money and time that they've invested.

I agree with you, every successful Ico project must have a product that can offset the price in the market, and they must lock in the payments received by the bounty hunters until they succeed in maintaining the price

This is now the order of the day. Many developers don't care how their coins fare in exchange that's why theirs no buy back program. Once they make millions from investors at ICO, then then they manage to list on IDEX or Latoken and off they zoom to enjoy their loot. I think it's just another type of well organised scam from developers.

agree, ico developers have to buy back tokens that are sold by investors and bounty hunters, so there will be no more bearish overload, my reason is because ICOs who managed to get millions of dollars and money for project development. I think are not fully used, maybe 50% can buy back tokens sold in the market and the rest for project development, with such a system, maybe and I am very sure there will be a lot of successful ico on the market

I think at the moment there is a time when the ICO project that does not create a good product and does not have good marketing will not be able to raise money and therefore there will be no demand for it. I think that the token was successful it is necessary that the product was associated with the financial actions, transactions, and attracted the attention of the public.

The price of ICO will depend on market situations. If the market is in the bearish trend, then the ICO will go down and maybe the ICO will not worth to buy and sell. We see many ICO cannot survive in this bear market and many of them have to cancel to get into the coin list in the market because they know that if they force this, they will not succeed to reach a new price in the market. Only when the market turns into the bullish market, the ICO can enter the market and then the ICO can compete with the other coin.

I personally agree with you, many of this new projects keep making the bad moves of listing projects below its price after making millions of dollars from its ico and will not take any further action to grow its market prices. If they can't initiate a buyback or means to create liquidity to its market and project then we all are going down

a market should naturally develop, not a repurchase done by the developer. the market should have a reasonable demand because this is greatly influenced by the views of Coin owners for a long time. buying back is not the way to develop a project. innovation and real steps that will determine whether the project is interesting or not.

I think the buy back mechanism is a great tool to ensure price doesn't dip to a large extent. I believe if many teams adopt this, the market situation will be better. But ironically, many team members convert to FIAT and will never buy back their own tokens.

I would say the buy back plan is a good leverage for bounty hunters and investors during initial coin offering
But there have also been great project that did not give out any form of buy back plan and still did well in the market and some that initially offered where reluctant to go on with it

After my observation, the prices are dumped by bounty hunters in most ICOs. Freezing bounty rewards for some time will help project to keep itself more appropriate. The buyback mechanism is also a good idea. But will devs sacrifice their money?  ???

I don't think the main focus of the ICOs is to make the bounty hunters rich... When a bounty hunters promotes a project he/she takes the risk tha the ICO price and market price may not be the same. I've never seen a bounty campaign when any project promised a fixed price for the token once it hits the exchange..
Every project on its disclaimer says that the market price is out of the reach of the team

It's true that the bear market and dump tokens by bounty hunters make the price fall. A lot of tokens have lost over 90%. However, there are projects that do not lose so much. An example is Aidus. He has lost value temporarily, but he is already making up for losses:
https://www.coinbene.com/exchange.html#/exchange?pairId=AIDBTC

A buyback would be good but there is no chance of that happening, they collected bitcoins and ethereum and they won't waste it on buying their own worthless tokens. Token burn would have a positive effect sometimes but not always

Price dropping after hit the market is quite normal because most of them are from the bounty hunters that sold their tokens for fast money and also because of the project is still fresh and new. When the project hit or reach the roadmap, and the result is positive, the price of that token will increase so high.

Plan to buyback is good but i think it's only make the price go up for a short time, after the buyback done, the price will go down again.

because what is happening now is that there are a lot of ico that have no real projects in the world and for that all the ico coins that are on the market will definitely decline and it will be difficult to return because the volume in that market continues to decline.

It has become a tradition these days. Every ICO I see launches a coin and when the coin gets listed on an exchange, it gets dumped hard.
Sometimes it dumps so hard that it takes months to recover and come back to the ICO price. This has become a serious issue now.
The ICOs can either keep a buy back mechanism or set a limit to the amount of coins that can be sold when the  coin gets listed on exchanges.

its hard to find an ICO project with buy back mechanism,,
because as i know all money that collected during the crowdsale was used for the development and marketing my friend
but who knows, in the near time, a project with buy back mechanism will be born in this industry  ;)

You are very right and we have seen exactly the same situation for last one year or so, for me i think there is no way we can sell in 10 to 20x loss so if the project is good and you think that they will come up with a solid product then holding is the best option because when market goes bullish all these coins will become expensive as well and that is when you can take profit.

buyback is not the only way to stop a dump. as long as this project continues to grow, I'm sure the price will slowly rise. there are actually many ways to prevent token dumps when the initial listing is on the market. such as token listings to large exchanges, locking bounty tokens, distributing tokens gradually, and much more.

I think this method can be applied and without a buyback I think dump will stop.

I don't see what hope is left for ICO in this space unless something drastic happens then that could be game over, people are talking about STO's now but I have yet to see one that is really making waves, Polymath to me is not ready to play the big boys. I would be happy to see if anyone would recommend any STO platform to me

after bounty hunters work, he will get his rights, namely wages in the form of tokens or ico, but once the coin is successful for listing. sometimes the bounty hunter coins are logged when prices start falling logs opened.I am an act that is detrimental to the bounty hunter and is not fair and not sportif.

I really can't understand why an ico don't buy their tokens after the meltdown. I mean if you raised 50m $ and your total supply worth 1m $ with the current price, with just a little bit of money, you can turn the table. But they are greedy and doesn't care anything besides themselves.

Actually the concept of STO implies that startup should have some collateral to be able to make fund raising. I hope that in this case these projects would have some kind of buyback mechanism or at least pay bounty rewards not in tokens, but in already existed crypto like ETH, TRX, NEO or whatever where the project will be based on.

I know this, because some of project that come from my country, developer said want to do buy back to make people believe tokens will pumped. I think buyback will used by project that dumped from ICO price because even devs wouldn't want to buy in their ICO price.

Buyback really doesn't make the value of ICO projects rise again. If you want a price increase project, please support that project if their team is still actively working, that's the only way.

Buy back can  help increase liquidity for some time.  But the main way to improve token price is for the token to have real usecase qns be used to solve real life problems

It has long been an idea that projects should buy back their tokens from bounty hunters and investors who want to sell, as this will eliminate the decline in prices.

Projects don't necessarily need a buy back if throughly they have a working product or a means to actually effect their roadmaps. Unfortunately, these days, most projects are full of imaginary and theoretical explanations on their whitepapers and no real plan of execution. Such projects have no substance and will most definitely be unsustainable leading to massive dumps once listed. If a project truly has what it explains, then price stability can be sustained since no one will be willing to sell. Buy back however, has enormous benefits to the project such as build up of volume on the exchange, reinventing confidence amongst investors etc.

You are absolutely right on this. I asked in an ICO group that why you are not doing buyback to protect the price, they said it is not legal to buyback! I don't know if this real or not. Actually, I think, they do not care about investors money. They raised millions of dollars, that's mean they are rich. And, after listing on exchanges, some Presale investors dump the price! if they wish to buy back cheap orders then the price can be backed and strong, but they will not do that! They say this is not in our control, the market decides the price!

The crypto bearish market seems will not end so soon, and if ICO projects will keep this scheme continue then ICO market will come to end and yes bounty hunters are already suffering for it.

the problem of the market is that it think in US dollar

I can give you proof that buyback is really helpful for the total community. Because if you buy back all the cheap sell orders, then your coin's price will be stable and more people will be interested to invest in your coins, and the community will be happy because the coin they own have a strong value and that is not a dumping-pumping coin. So, they will promote your project gladly, and if you continue works to develop the products by following the roadmap, then no doubt your project will hit a new milestone in the future.

Yes i agree a good ICO always will give good profit for investor So there is no buyback mechanism is needed .Few ico are not good they are always show this kind buyback method in this project .

so many ICO I was Joined promise to buy back their token. but until today it not happen. buy back mechanism just for project which care about the future of their product. or maybe they just want to raise money and don't care anymore with the project.

Yes you are very right,every successful ICO must have a working product that will bring the token price up even if dumpers make the price crash ,as far as the token is a very good project it will get its feet back

Not necessarily "over" if they can produce an effective product. But I get OP's point on the team buying back some tokens from funds gathered during the ICO then possibly burning them to limit the supply.

This is how they are supporting their early adopters. Other than this, it will imply like they are no more interested into their projects. Recently, one of my friend shared like he came across many very good white papers and high potential concepts but unfortunate most devs are losing their interest to continue their hard work after ICO. It means once they see some money, they just want to have vacation by forgetting their promises.

A good project must focus of product/solution. I do not have any argument on that. But, they must allocate some 5% to 10% for buy back of tokens and then after implementing their solution or after developing and after start profiting from the project they must focus on buy-back of tokens with up to 25% of their margin levels. It will be beneficial to them and for early investors too.

Yes, I agree with you bro, the Buyback program is one way to stabilize the price of tokens at ICO prices. But investors who are supposed to do it, funds obtained from ICO are not for the buyback program but are used to develop the project. So the Buyback program should be done by investors.

yes, this cycle always happen and less of ico project who dares to not adopted this way, if you sure with your product and your project, no need to buy back.

There are some ICO projects that promise that once their project is running, they will use part of their profits to buy tokens from the market. However, what you are proposing will not happen. If ICO teams had to freeze their funds to buy back all the tokens they could not develop their projects and these would be a failure before the start. The only way ICO teams can avoid their tokens from dumping is not distributing the tokens or locking them until the market changes.

To be honest, recently it seems to me that many ICO projects that today still have the opportunity to collect funds should definitely increase the opportunities for their investors. All this will definitely give investors more strength.

it cannot be denied that ICO is very dependent on market conditions, with the current market conditions making ICO coins worthless in the market, therefore many ICO projects are delaying registering their coins in the current exchange. ICO developers should be able to have a solution to all this so that the ICO can survive and be attractive to investors.

well,let me tell what i think about it,first of all,buyback is not a solution for it,strongest comunity and good corporation is a primary thing for make ico succesfully,recently,ico just take a standar investor also with a huge payment for bounty to make their ico have a lot of participant,but the fact,a lot of people try to cheating.the new of succesfully ico of this year is bittorent,why i am choose bittorent ? because they really serious for creating a project,apply for binance launchpad , then after approving,of course binance will handle of investor, can u see how many investor of that project , about 340 on bnb,not too much,but reach the hardcap.i believe they are a veteran investor,dare to lock their money for a long time and waiting for profit,and u see its x5 from ico price.

I'm ok with buy back mechanism even if it is 50% of the ICO price, so investors will not lose I have seen going to the market with no buy order and the investors are nowhere to go because they are holding a useless coin, with no way out they are 100% lost here, buy back will ease that issue.

Where you get this 50% of ICO price or your suggestion ? A buy back mechanism should focus on volume that they are going to buy and definitely not at the price levels. It is like buy at market prices and at any volume. I believe there were many projects had implemented this buy back feature but it will not enough for convincing investors in my opinion too.

A real project will develop their business and then from the profits they will start investing into their tokens which will help them maintain a good reputation among crypto world and also in in their business domain too.

I think that in each product double standards should not be pursued and then all goals will be achieved!

Yeah, you are right. I think ICO Project really has to do a Buyback program, to keep prices from falling far below the ICO price. But now I see many ICO projects that don't care about investors and also bounty hunters, they let the price of their tokens dump. Yeah, they have made a profit and no longer care about the price of their tokens. I think, now that's what happened to the ICO.

So far Binance did great job as an ERC token and some others . But most of the projects if we think then there is even no need for a blockchain and you can run same business without blockchain . I was following so many projects that in my opinion had no chance of failure , but looks like they are fading slowly lol . Now im really careful by choosing project tokens to hold . They promise so many things you can't even finish and that market is currently down....

Well most of time ICO's are shady in nature as long as many countries still not regulate and ICO's these incidents will continue. thats the main story prologue By the way Buyback mechanism was firstly included in their respective whitepaper if you cant find this information it means that there is no buyback on the pipeline just accept it and move on thats the real deal no more stress, no hassle.

When I think of a bear market, most ICO projects will face this situation, and investors should be brave enough to face their own investment behavior and make correct judgments.

Yes, I agree with that because some success ICO's are not paying for the hard works of their workers on their projects, that's why some people saying that only 10% of ICO's that are paying them and not scamming their own workers.

I totally disagree with something that you called as a Buyback Mechanism, I think that is total bullshit and a market price manipulation by the Dev. New investors will think that the coin worth in some value and buy them in the high price, but later on when the Dev runs out of money, and they cannot buyback their coin, the coin price will fall, and the investors lost a lot.

You know when coin entering the market and the price dropped, it is because they deserve it, if the project is actually good, the price will not drop. Even if it really dropped the first time the coin enter the market, the price will naturally go up again and follow other cryptos movement without the Dev need to do any price manipulation thing like buyback their coin.

Why you say bullshit ? do you already learn deepest the buy back mechanism ideology ?  that's not just  market price manipulating. but one way to keep their project still a live. Good and Giant project just not thinking about the price today, the long term value in future as well.


Oh man , Buyback Mechanism Build a trust for community and investor. and not easy as you say. and if that implemented in this bear market situation, so the trust foundation will go stronger. trust are the real value of the project.

maybe you mean only 10% ICO are paying their hunter on this market condition. so the OP mean buyback mechanism will be better if implemented in this bear market condition. Buyback build a trust to community. so all we need here now are Trust. Trust from community will made some project solid and stronger. then it will give much good impact especially to the price in future.

The bear market will give whole icos really difficult situation consider about the demand to buy the token will be less compared when we have faced the bullish trend in 2017 when any ico can create more than 5x from the ico price easily.

The truth is now is the best time to know if a ICO or project is good or not ,I believe if the project has a working product it will still perform better in this bearish market condition, I don't bother with ICO anymore because almost all ICO rely on market price and funds ,I will only join ICO with teams that are ready to fund there projects themselves for now if not?then I will wait till market recovers better

Interesting. 
 Never knew they do buyback, though I suspected such thing might be happening.  Well, shouldnt matter too much  as long as they are solid projects

I almost suggested a buyback to a coin developer some months ago i to help bounty hunters. Never knew buyback was a thing then.

The demand for not purchasing tokens is because many ICOs fail because investors think 2x to invest.

don't compare ico first because it won't happen again until now.

The strongest and the most patient will survive in this market, and the rest of the fans of quick earnings will go to earn money elsewhere. ICO and earnings in bounty campaigns is still possible, this is not the end, I'm sure! You just need to be patient.

If we talk about real projects that involve the possibility of buying out coins, as well as a system of passive income, yes, then such projects have every chance of real positive development. It seems to me that such opportunities will attract investors more and more.

I feel like investors lose more
Before as a bounty hunter, you have so so little to lose if a project fails

You took the risk to join the bounty
Remember, all bounty have a rules regarding payment that can be altered

indeed, nowadays most icons like that if already on the market will be destroyed because they do not have volume in the market so the price will decline and will not be able to return, most ico currently do not have real projects so it only lasts a few days.

Only projects like Bittorrent with the market force of Binance can really have a successful ICO with no buy back plan because the hype and product created around it is enormous enough to sustain buy orders

Most of them can't guarantee buy back because they don't know if they'll succeed. In this market most ICOs fail so they have no money to buy anything back. You can't expect it as an investor. Better not to invest if the odds are against you. Complaining won't change anything.

Such a statement is not comprehensive enough. In the past bull market, investors and bounty hunters can get huge returns. I believe that the long-term persistence in this forum is rich people.

Projects are getting big investments and prices are falling. But there's something overlooked. Many projects have a long-term plan and Roadmap. However, we want the project to be able to give back the value we provide today. This is against nature.

But they can't have a big change for bounty, If they have big changes for it, such as reducing the amount of bonuses many times, or delaying payment for several months. Those are unacceptable actions and it is scam

with unfavorable market conditions, it will be very difficult for ICO projects to control the price of their tokens when registered at an exchange and I think if an ICO project dares to buy back will be able to help maintain the price of their coins at prices that don't fall too much. although the possibility is very small, they do remember that they need a lot of money to do this.

They can allocate funds for this even a small percentage is a good start and if they believe in their project the coins that they buy back will have good value in the long run and they are the one that will make profit and as long as they develop their project, the coins that they buy back will have good value

In this situation it depends to demand in the market even the ICO is successful. If the project have a good product and marketing it will have maintain good value in the market even its bearish season. We all know that what is the success of the project the investor and bounty hunter will be benefit to it.

There you go, someone else willing to use a little bit of logic and rational thinking.

Investors by definition risk something the moment they make a choice. Hard cash just sitting there. Bounty hunters, in fact have nothing to lose but time itself. And in 2017 people were just spending 5 minutes and seeing, wow I could make hundreds of dollars doing this. Well that greed and expectation of easy money was so appealing to people.

So they came. Investors lost and bounty hunters whined.

Well, true after all investors and bounty users would get the most benefit a lot about the success of an Ico. A lot of Ico’s failed because of cannot sustain the needs for the project. So, by having this buyback mechanism can also help to attract and ensure the needs of an investors when investing into the project.

They were all gonna die anyway, that's how they were supposed to be because developers just never thought of continuing to develop a project after they have got what they want. It just sucks on most part of bounty hunters and also the investors that ICO these days are not like the same as before. I think it is dying already because of this kind of developers and their team.

I think that projects that collect millions of dollars can easily afford to support their own coins by buying some of the coins from holders, at least in a bear market, this will help to avoid total prices and keep the cost.

you are right every project should have a final product that can provide its investors and not just blow the air away .

The problem of falling prices after the ICO is the main reason for the collapse of the bounty community. Since very often projects want to benefit and leave the market and then reopen the project which will be similar to the same. Here the question is the honesty of the organizers and developers of the project. If there is a constant technical support of the product as well as competent marketing, the price will decrease minimally and will grow in the future. Quality project and this is different. You have to choose wisely.

Why to search ICOs with buy back mechanizm if you can sell bounty stakes immediately when they earned (appear on the spreadsheet) for ETHEREUM on Tokpie exchange.

I think that buyback mechanism should be prevalent in most ICOs. However, this is not the case. I saw Helbiz announcing a buyback and Dropil I think was the other one project.
This shows the team is engaged and believe in the project.

That is right, the ICO should using some of their raised funds to support their token price in the market.
Im afraid if they don't prevent dump on their token price, it won't be able to recover the value of their token in the future.

very agree if an ico is successful and for ico developers to have to buy back tokens sold by investors and bounty hunters,
chances are that the upcoming ico will definitely succeed again, because investors' trust will definitely be obtained in the future.

Cryptocurrency tokens are created to have a fixed supply and had been released on a decentralized ledger, which ensures that value is assigned accordingly based on how the market speculates on the price of the token.

However, the existence of tokens don’t always benefit blockchain companies and can work to undermine the progress of the business if the tokens have no proper utility, or the market chooses not to associate the business achievements with the price of the token.

If the project have too much people dumping their coin, keeping the coin price would take all the resources they have also it's very risky for the project's financial. To prevent dumping is only by making a good token supported by strong project.
i know that even a strong buyback mechanism will have a hard time keeping their coin from dumpers

It is a good idea if all successful ICO has a buyback program to avoid the price dumping although they still need to have a working product to realize the true value of their coin. Buyback + Burning program will be great if all project has it.

The buyback is indeed a good way to ensure investors and bounty hunters get decent coins, because at least they will not suffer heavy losses
but I think there are only a few developers who agree to do that because their initial purpose of holding an ICO is because they need money so they will not be able to buyback especially for ICOs who only get softcap

There should be a demand for the product as that is the proof that it is useful. Beyond that, buyback mechanisms could
boost the price as they are reducing the supply and the supporting the price. Many successful projects using that model.

I'm not really sure about what really the cause of the drop on the coin price when it got listed in the market, but what i think, that would be because there are people who sell their coins in a lower price compared to the price when it firstly introduced during the ICO or something like that. because those people wanted to have quick money from the coins that they had. That is what i'm thinking of.

that's because the coin market has not yet been formed. most are people who come from the coin community. and they all want to sell to earn money. the disadvantage for the new project are listed, it is because the team has not been prepared or not growing the trader to make a strong buying power in the market. When the response of the market is still less then that happens those who sell will surely lower the selling price.

I agree with you on these ,buying back method is the only way to fix liquidity and dumping in price too so project teams are the ones I wish reading this right now ,the only way for ICO projects to succeed in this bearish market is all in the teams hand unless ICO is cancelled and all projects move to IEO ,I'm not sure if this will affect bounty hunters

I think its good but its hard to implemented in crypto market or others market. If we know stocks market, sometimes the stocks price below IPO and company not issuing buyback mechanism. Its happen not only in crypto but as far i know, its happen to most investment market. Maybe its because its pure speculation

Sometimes, I do believe that it is also some of the mechanism put in place by the project developers too to avoid the coin being dumped by the general holdlers, since they own the larger part of the coins, what they do is to first of all dump the coin themselves so the price can crash a bit and discourage the investor or bounty hunter in further dumping as the price won’t be a favorable ones for them pending the time the market picks up or pending when they have a working products because I have heard countless times that some of these ICO succeeded in raising funds without working products till after the ICO before they use the fund available to them to decide on one.

A responsible team will do a buyback in other to keep their project from over dumping. A very good project with a great team and good market liquidity may need not to buy back as the natural forces of trade will stabilize the token according to the market conditions. Bounty hunters are really running their precious time and facilities in losses these days because of failing projects.

It doenst mean that projects that use the buyback mechanism are bad projects infact its a very good way to keep a coin price at bay and it only shows how dedicated the teams are ,I like the buyback trick it works perfectly and can make the coin or token increase in price

It is a common occurrence this days to see token dumped after its initial listing or else if the solid get much hype. At times, the token will take months before it can fully recover and this is the reason why I always buy token during its initial listing.

but it's hard to find ico like that
but you have to try IEO like ICO
in February 2019 there were many IEOs such as TOP, BTT, CELER, their sales were successful and when the market entry price was above the initial sale

I would like to say that you and I need a platform or service that today could really make our cryptocurrency life much more profitable than, for example, with ICO or even with IEO

I look ICO is the dangerous place for an investment, you can imagine when funds has been achieved and the token has been released in the exchange then the price token will be drop drastically, I'm sure with that. Some investors will not look how the potential project it is in the future they just need a profit, moreover with the instant profit. So as they will consider many times to join it again and even for some of them will give up after they feel a huge loses. We can't see the future of a project although we feel the project/token really has a potential, because we don't know the future cryptocurrency will be accept by all countries, so for now may many people uses cryptocurrency especially an ICO project for instant profit only.

It is nice to see a project to have a buy back system but I would rather see them use their fund to deliver their project plan.  I am a bounty hunter myself but I love to see a project completing its roadmap than setting an initial buyback right after their crowdfunding.  More success of the project means more value to our holdings.  And it is one of the risk (our token reward may have worth or worthless) as bounty reward.  If we cannot take this risk then it is better to just leave being a bounty hunter.

that's what makes ico finally die, no matter how successful ico is if after launching tokens and listings on the market exchange, if there is no repurchase, then ico will become a dead project.

So is the repurchase needed to stabilize the price of the token? Well, indeed there are some ICOs that plan, so if the price goes down, then the buyback will be done so that the token stays in motion.

buy back mechanism is something that developer and team should do
when token hit market it always be dump at first time , no one can handle that when investor wanna sell their coin/token

You are absolutely right in your thoughts and then comes the need to alwaysmake sure that every project invested in and every projects bounty hunter participate in are thoroughly investigated before carrying out such investment, we might have some of these bad projects in the system but we still have quite huge numbers of very good project that are out there with no plans of collapsing, it might have happened in the past and lots of us have witness some of these very bad project but I think in this recent time, we have lots of tools now to help us decide on an investment such as the IEO launch pad and many more.

You also cannot blame the bounty hunter in this case because they have been waiting for a long time for a reward and it is only natural that they immediately sell it and cannot wait any longer. if you don't want a dump token after the launch, the team must anticipate it with various methods such as improving product quality and giving discounts for repurchases with a 20% increase in profit.

I think that right now in the market, what you have to have is patience and have a lot of restraint with our investments, many projects may seem to fall apart, but it is inevitable that some put bad news and cause panic.

It is very normal that in this phase of the market these events occur, because in every accumulation phase the market prices are low, in the case of projects, alternative cryptocurrencies, tokens may go down in price, but they will have their moment when the market that Lead Bitcoin start taking your bullish trend phase, since the recovery will be imminent and new investments will begin because people will start to believe more.

If the project has a good working product and is doing great marketing they will not need to have a buyback process, but if this happens, there is no chance for the token price to recover without a  buying back process.

Many people just keep blaming hunters based on their believe without considering the real facts that, the percentage of coins given to bounty hunters is not at all enough to even drag the price of ICO down 10% and we can’t also blame the investors too, because they can only keep holding their coin if they believe in the project.

Once a developer experiences big dump in their projects, rather than blaming people, they should find out why their projects was abandoned, if there is anything they are not getting right and also check if the product and services being rendered are really of demand.

some projects have things such as this, but until this moment I have not understood about the mechanism of buy back tokens.

Guys...can you give an example with the information rest and the management of the developer. So indeed in this case the developers have control if if they don't want to see the price of a value token or coin.