Bitcoin Forum

Check this out, from article posted 4 days ago:


In my opinion, in the near future he is going with this and other evidence to some US court and proves behind any doubt that he is indeed Satoshi Nakamoto.

Unleash the kraken, I want to see some real flame and despair in this thread!

https://medium.com/@craig_10243/evidence-and-law-f8f10001efa5 (https://medium.com/@craig_10243/evidence-and-law-f8f10001efa5)

He’s an embarrassment to be honest, a cringeworthy weasel. I can’t wait until we see his demise. The only way he can prove he is Satoshi is if he signs a message from a well known Satoshi early address & he won’t because he can’t.

i don't care who satoshi is, but i believe someone who files a lawsuit against somebody who don't believe in what he said is not satoshi.

here's what satoshi said in the past (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=532.msg6306#msg6306)

so even if craig is really satoshi, then he is not the same satoshi that i knew.

I am actually getting tired of hearing Craig Wright cry that he is Satoshi Nakamoto. It's really hilarious how he gets fires up attacling people who are saying he is not, and he even filed legal actions to some of the. I believe before ho does that he must present a solid a d credible proof that he really is Nakamoto.

Why not give the full sentence?

He is talking about payment processor and transaction speed. What is your point exactly with the quote? Actually it sounds very much as Craig Wright expressed himself on twitter.

As I said in my first post here -

If a Supreme Court receives enough evidence to confirm that CW is indeed Satoshi Nakamoto, will you still be tired of hearing of him, what will you feel then?

Why all this game from Craig wrght, if truly he is santoshi then there are hundred ways he can prove that to us either by signing a message with santoshi wallet or better still clarify the whole situations by withdrawing from santoshi bitcoin balance as a proof. I read in the news that Craig is sue to court for fraud related offenses how true is that.

who the f** is supreme court? we are in a bitcoin world and everything is decentralized and protected by strong cryptography of elliptic curves. i don't give a f** about what some court says ,when CW has not been able to provide a simple cryptographic proof of his identity. a proof that is so easy and yet so strong that can easily be produced if you have the keys and is impossible to fake if you don't. and he has failed to provide that.

Bitcoin is now way bigger than anyone that claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto. I thought I read that Wright doesn't write a bitcoin code! Even if he was the real Satoshi which I will never believe, he won't need to visit the court to prove his Identity, he should simply avoid a fight and prove that technologically which of course he really can't.

Lmao. Another 'Craig Wright is Satoshi' thread. At this rate, it feels like he is forcing everyone to believe that he is the One. This is downright hilarious. Even exchanges like Binance are pissed with what this guy is trying to do here and went on to delist BSV.

BSV already fell in value by 17% since then. Complete stupidity.

Every one can claim that he is Nakamoto. So what if,Wright is real Nakamoto? It is doesn't matter even he is rmthe real Nakamoto or not,because even we found out and recognized Nakamoto's personality and know who is he we did not have any reward or income, so why we are still very curius in his real identity. Make sense.

As someone pointed out in response to him, that screenshot means nothing, because such services can be purchased for any domain. Moreover, I notice it is only a partial screenshot.

Did you actually believe that scumbag to be the real Satoshi when his evidence is not that heavy? He released man articles for his claims but none did suffice for his claims.

Enough of these speculative speech from Craig Wright as the real Satoshi Nakamoto, how can somebody who never believe on the technology created by himself and his team? that's some sort of misunderstanding on Craig W. part. Let him clear this ones and for all by signing a message from the early Satoshi wallet, than you.

If he is the satoshi nakamoto then why did he hide himself and even he promoted the crypto currency and blockchain and did not came forward claiming himself the developer behind it. But now when this project got famous and billions of amount is their behind the real name he wanted to take the credit but he dont have any full proof sources to claim it. Even he dont have the keys to open the wallets which were used in the starting of the mining. This is nothing but the useless stunt to be in limelight.

I hear he rested on the seventh day. What do you think ?

I heard that too but I don't think it's right, still a lot to be created, there was no time to rest :) .

Again and again, we hear more news about him. Okay, if he is the real Satoshi Nakamoto, let's him to show the proof and verify himself as the real one. Let's him brought the case to the court and see what justice will say about him and who is he. I will wait for the next news about him, and if he is the real Satoshi, then I will wait for him to pump the bitcoin price and don't dump bitcoin price to run away for the money.

People have indeed started receiving legal notices from Craig for calling him fake. Among the receivers, there are some prominent people like Vitalik and Peter McCormack. Now today Peter McCormack issued a counter notice to Craig. The debate and legal battle is just warming up and we will have a long story to follow soon.

In the meantime BSV is getting delisted from Binance. So wait and watch before jumping into a conclusion! This attention drama is not going to end anytime soon!

it still surprises me that some people to this day still insist on accepting the lies of CW even though his fraud can not be any clearer than this!

all that aside, the funniest thing about all this is that the drama that CW started is biting him in the ass as BSV is dropping so hard these days and is also being removed from the big altcoin exchanges :D

First things first, lets call him 'Fake Right' rather than 'Craig Wright'  ;D ;D
I don't think Satoshi revealing his identity would matter much to bitcoin. All it can do is add a little publicity to bitcoin which will in turn create a short temporary spike in bitcoin's price.
Once the things are settled bitcoin will continue to grow naturally as it always had been unless new developments take place.
So even if Fake Right is not fake it won't matter to bitcoin.

This really blows it all. I don't really know why people are believing that Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto. And filing a lawsuit against someone? That's very rude and unworthy of everybody's time to listen to. If he is the real personality behind bitcoin, then he don't need to convince us any longer.

And even though the quote came from Satoshi answering questions in forum, still if that phrase is what he holds on then Craig Wright is not Satoshi.

I wouldn't believe him even if he could.

If he somehow managed to sign from an early Satoshi-linked address, then all that proves is that he has his hands on the private key to that address. I think it would be a much more likely scenario that he had somehow stumbled upon/stolen the private keys or seed from Satoshi or someone else who was around in the very early days of bitcoin. Comparing Satoshi's writing and philosophy with CSW's lies, scams and general incompetence (https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Craig_Wright), is more than enough proof that they are not the same person, regardless of any private keys that CSW may or may not control.

Can you imagine going to such great lengths to stay anonymous and then completely disappear, only to come back, offer no proof, and then start suing people who don't believe you?

Filing legal action against those who attacked him for not being Satoshi Nakamoto means that, his claims are not true but false. The proof should come from the signing of the early addresses of the real Satoshi Nakamoto. He should stop this social media thing of being Satoshi Nakamoto.

I do not understand why so much discussion on the subject, as the ceo of binance says: if it really is satoshi nakamoto, because it does not make a digital signature to prove it? or move the bottom where you have saved your bitcoins for more than 8 years? (in bitinfocharts you can see wallets that have not moved in that time), it's as simple as that!

Even if Craig persuades some court after years of legal battles that he is Satoshi the community is going to be so tired and annoyed with him at that point that nobody will give a damn. He could prove it like a man but he's acting like a weasel instead trying to go against the natural development of Bitcoin and arguing with everyone.

He's not Satoshi I'm sure of it.

my god, if he is the real one, why is he trying to prove it in an abstrac way?, things should be more easy than that, just think on it....
i cant wait for the day where we stop talking about this Virus wright guy...




oh! sad to read that.

If anything, this smug narcissist needs to be put in his place.
 
https://bitcoinist.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/ap-craig-wright.jpg

As mentioned above, anyone who wants to prove themselves as the true Satoshi can provide easy and undisputable proof. But as of now, none has been provided. I see no reason to keep fueling the ego of this autistic egomaniac.

oh! i see, anyway, who know what will happen in the future!



exactly, but sadly i think he is getting what he want, fame... ( bad fame... )

Yeah, why not just send a message from known satoshi addresses. Doesn't he have access to that account? Did he lose it?

Tbh I doubt satoshi would rise from the dead and start hunting people who don't believe that he is indeed satoshi. Instead of doing that, he'd probably start coding and building other things, maybe contribute on new BIP, or something similar. He is not someone who looks for fame, if that's what he is, then he wouldn't even use this anonymous avatar.

https://i.imgur.com/xNn6Zgb.gif

Do you really believe what you wrote?

Follow my thinking:

If he had any proof, do not you think he would have shown it for a long ago?

Do you think if he was satoshi he would create an altcoin?

look at everything he says and does, his actions make people realize clearly that he is a person who thinks he is the greatest in the world, someone like that would not create something decentralized like bitcoin. The guy is a damn selfish

Craig Wright is claiming that he is Satoshi Nakamoto. How is that for a person who doesn't look for fame???

indeed.
i am starting to be annoyed by how many people are talking about this weasel nowadays. everywhere you look from bitcointalk, reddit, twitter to all the news sites you keep seeing his nasty name and face.

 Satoshi also tweeted that it was his nephew who made the threat to sue hodlnaut. The Bitcoin Cash SV community should start signing a petition to list his coin back.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D4SlYAfWwAYrkPT?format=jpg&name=large

8)

It is a known fact that Craig is the father of Bitcoin he has already declared  himself to be the creator of bitcoins as Satoshi Nakamoto being his user name and later when he was asked to prove it he just vanished and did not move ahead nor tried to prove himself to be Satoshi

He already did that.  Gavin will explain all the details to you on that one.

is that the real account belonging to the real CSW? you know since the username says @ProfFaustust!
and please don't call this scammer "satoshi" even sarcastically ;)

---

similar to any other useless fork coin, BSV is also a failed experiment attempt that has been doomed to fail the day it forked off. these things only stay alive with pump and dumps their exclusion from exchanges means their only source of life is now dwindling...

This news is fake.

Check it out here: https://www.unblock.news/popular/zhao-craig-wright-is-not-satoshi-could-delist-bsv-from-binance

I do not see Craig Wright as Satoshi and neither do many crypto lovers. If he is really the real Nakamoto he should withdraw some Bitcoin from Satoshi bitcoin wallet address.

You're right, and with Roger Ver's help, they will show the world, then put "Bitcoin" back on track through Satoshi's Real Vision in Bitcoin Cash SV.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DOZraZBXcAAM4Rz.jpg

To the moon. 8)

Craig Wright. You are the real Satoshi. Please don't sue me. Hahaha. :-*

you can't just bring anything you like and call that "evidence". i call that nonsense. what Craig Wright has always done is that since he doesn't have any proof (he obviously is not Satoshi) so he always tries to manipulate things and use drama to get his ways. and there still are so many who fall for it.

Agreed. If anyone else came out with this kind of nonsense he spews, they would be rightly laughed at. But for some reason, every time CSW makes some new grand claim or wild accusation, the crypto media jump all over it, and it gets shared all over various platforms. He only continues to do this because it brings him the attention he seeks.

If we could all just ignore him, he and his joke coin would disappear.

Wow that such a great proof that he is Satoshi  ;D
We don't care who is Satoshi Nakamoto. It will not bring any value to us if he is. And If we wanted to be called Nakamoto then he should think of it when he first published Bitcoin WP.

True, personally it have never occur to me that Craig Wright is the same person as Satoshi Nakamoto becasue of his behavioral attitudinal actions against Bitcoin several time which i have witness over time. Craig W. has no evidence to prove his point beyond doubt.

You created Bitcoin but yet still went ahead to create faction against what you have created, that's not logical.

Oh my ! Dumb and dumber...

https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1118430193562079234

As far as I know Craig wright is not santoshi and to that extent what ever evidence any one thinks he can bring up is left for him/her self, Craig is already facing the music for his fraudulent act and his coin BSV have already delisted from the world biggest exchange that is binance and others will follow soon.

Exactly, those evidence are useless because if you're Satoshi Nakamoto you will just show the legal proof about it and you don't need to tell people about it or force anyone to believe on you. Craig Wright is not a good guy to be honest, he's a manipulator and this move can be use for his own propaganda or interest. Let's stop spreading a news like this because most of the users here will not believe on any statements of Craig Wright.

no one knows for sure, and those who know for sure who their Satoshi Nakamoto is will definitely keep it a secret for various reasons, one of which is for the security of Satoshi Nakamoto

You can edit documents VERY easily. Even more so on an HTML document using the inspect function on Chrome. The guy is a joke.

he was also talking about his stance when somebody disagrees or don't believe what he said.


not really when he tweets "i'll start suing you if you don't believe me".

---

anyway, if you disagree or don't get my point after this, i don't have time to convince you. sorry.
happy believing.

Right, we are just giving them the ego-boost that they people wanted in their life. WE already known that he is not Satoshi, he has been debunked many times already. Good thing though that he has been taking a lot of shitstorm lately and exchanges like Binance and Kraken wanted to put a stop to this weasel and his cohorts. Let's see what will be his next move, maybe sue everyone who slander him?  ;D.

CSW has been able to deceive some very rich and powerful people.  Just goes to show that charm and personality and charm can go a long way in persuasion.  He has said that the dead partner held the keys to those early addresses, awfully convenient isn't it.

Ok, so he bought some Anonymous domain and now suddenly he is Satoshi Nakamoto? He could have bought a domain for one of his other scams or just bought this from someone else.  ::)

Show us the domain that he bought and let's see what pops up out of that.  ::)  Or better still, just give us our ultimate request and sign the Genesis block or one of those addresses that are known to be mined by Satoshi back then.   ;)

I wish he can give solid evidence that he is Satoshi and then every law enforcement country in the world will go after him. He will be in court for the rest of his life!

There will be a time for people to let him talk whatever he wants. People are not agreed that he is the real Satoshi and many people react about what his saying. I think we need to wait for the time that will talk to Craig Wright that what he's doing is wrong and he should stop it before it's too late. I hope that he will get an inspirational moment that he will not do that thing again in the future. I could only  pray for him to be a better person.

How come the op believing the fake news. Craig is not the satoshi at all. Why should chooses his name satoshi and no initial signed message power of satoshi. Still believing he is satoshi means they are useless to find the access control of signed message too.

There are many news spreading states this is and that satoshi but until and unless he confirms it. We should not believe it for sure.

You are absolutely right. Thanks for posting Satoshi's message. It gave me an oversight to his character and I personally liked it very much.
It does prove that Satoshi and Craig has a huge difference in their respective characters. Craig is a more like an asshole though  :P
You have proved your point well and @HardFireMiner should probably understand it well now.

And also post using Satoshi Nakamoto's bitcointalk account so we can have another proof of being the man behind bitcoin
Though for me it’s right that he can’t because he ain’t the man we are waiting to unleash the truth

But i will give him the benefits of the doubt to prove everything in future

Not possible, account is blocked to avoid it being hacked.

He is opposite of what satoshi represents.
There values are quite different.
Have you heard  him speak?
 When I hear him speak, I wonder how I ended up  in crypto world with him.  I wonder if my decision to take crypto/blockchain seriously is worth it.

Noh, but a copy instead thats wants to be acknowledge as satoshi nakamoto. There is no way that guy who proclaim to be without the exposing real self to connect as satoshi will not determine to be a real satoshi unless he will prove it by providing evidences.

Imitating a legend is very common and this is how this guy done here.

Well, there's plenty of trolls, shills and morons in this world, so seeing idiotic opinions occasionally does not surprise me.

It is indeed good to see that community reacts to this bullshit, exchanges delisting CW's Bcash, people supporting those who are bullied by CW, like Hodlonaut.

While Satoshi and all other developers want anonymity, He wants out?

On the other hand, a sign message is all that he needs to prove, he doesn't have show evidences that can be faked and goes to any court just to prove it. What is is trying to achieve here? Getting BSV to be on major exchanges?

just look at the OP post history:



https://i.imgur.com/9I18imd.png

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1014868;sa=showPosts;start=120

you may realize that he is more of a guy who does not like how bitcoin is going


I would not be happy if the crazy guy was really satoshi

The acclaimed dude can proof to be Satoshi by replying to this thread with Satoshi main account here in this forum or better still, sign a message vai Satoshi wallet that is known to the public.

It is all bout having a coin using the name "Bitcoin" and selling it to investards, normies and plebs.

from forking to Bitcoin cash (BCH) to forking Bitcoin satoshi vision (BSV)?? BSV cements it, became too obvious he/they just want another shitcoin to sell.

As you can see from the provided by yourself screenshot, my post has 28 August 2018 date. On November 15 2018, Bitcoin Cash had a scheduled protocol upgrade, with 2 main implementation - 1 Bitcoin ABC with Wormhole upgrade to the Core, thus modifying Bitcoin to an unrecognizable state in my opinion, and 2 Bitcoin SV to 128MB for on-chain scaling and also re-enabled original “Satoshi” set of op_codes, particularly OP_MUL, OP_LSHIFT, OP_RSHIFT, and OP_INVERT.

Yes, I believe Btc (Bitcoin) has moved far away from the whitepaper during 1 August 2017 hard fork.
Yes, I also believe Bitcoin Cash ABC moved also away from Bitcoin whitepaper on 15 November 2018.

Is there any other thing I can clarify for you?

And since we are quoting Satoshi's posts in bitcointalk, check this one out:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=234.msg1976#msg1976


Bitcoin was never supposed to be anonymous, it was designed to be private.

I didn't know this fact until reading your post. It looks like forum admin and moderators decided to block the account for preventing the possible hacks. Craig Wright needs to re-think his strategy as a real Satoshi and some questions should be answered before accepting the verification of real Satoshi.

Any single incredible evidence he able to represent? So logically "Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto" it's absolutely false and now BSV will be delist from some big exchange like binance and kraken.
https://www.coindesk.com/kraken-exchange-joins-binance-shapeshift-in-delisting-bitcoin-sv

Records of credit card purchases don't directly point that he is indeed Satoshi Nakamoto when that bank and tax records has a name of Craig Wright? Right? And that is insufficient proof that is very unacceptable to most of the cryptocommunity. The burden of proof lies on Dr. Wright himself and he ought to show us more convincing proofs than those already shown because the community won't buy it.

Where you do get such information? If satoshis account can be hacked then they can probably hack this entire forum as well. What you think?

It's very strange that he was silent for so long and suddenly decided to show up. It is obvious that the evidence that he is Satoshi no. So it's a waste of time.

It’s becoming too much to read and hear this claims of being Satoshi or not. It wouldn’t take much for him to prove to the entire world that he is the real Satoshi. All these multiple claims simply means he is the real Satoshi. With or without satoshi , crypto is good to go . He has left a great legacy to follow up

yes. a lot of crypto enthusiasm that rejected Craig's statement. even wikileaks criticized him because he made false evidence. one of the easiest ways that craig could do to prove himself as Satoshi Nakamoto was to move a number of Bitcoin results from Genesis Blok. Without this method, it's hard to believe that Craig is really Satoshi Nakamoto.

These lies of CW have no strong evidence on them 
I think he is trying to support his position
and bad BSV position after delisted from Binance.

Where is your God now?



https://coingeek.com/bitcoin-creator-craig-s-wright-satoshi-nakamoto-granted-us-copyright-registrations-for-bitcoin-white-paper-and-code/


Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.

 (https://cocatalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?v1=15&ti=1,15&Search_Arg=bitcoin&Search_Code=FT%2A&CNT=25&PID=nzoD_881lnuCunVeTvIfD742gwJ8&SEQ=20190521081301&SID=1)
Bitcoin (https://cocatalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?v1=14&ti=1,14&SEQ=20190521105351&Search_Arg=bitcoin&Search_Code=FT%2A&CNT=25&PID=1Sf7j7MjABK2E91B9qt2RfNE9qSsM_P&SID=1)

I'll just quote myself from the other topic below. Anyone can file a copyright claim for anything and it would be registered. This means absolutely nothing in terms of proving he is Satoshi.  Actually, that's incorrect. This is yet more evidence that he is decidedly not Satoshi. To think Satoshi would start filing copyright claims on bitcoin is utterly laughable. CSW continues to be a fraud, liar, and scammer.

all evidence points to Craig Wright. For some reason there seems to be something strange, it seems that this evidence can be traced from the past why it is now being published.
Is he just looking for popularity from Satoshi Nakamoto figure. he tried to influence that he was a figure who had been making people curious. there must be strong evidence if he or any wanna to prove it.

CSW

I appreciate your opinion, also I can note your naivety.

Signed - Just a Bitcoin SV shill, you can call me like that, no problem or hard feelings.

A copyright registration is NOT the same thing as a copyright.

Its really not so hard to understand.

If you read the coingeek article first on the issue, then I can see how you might be confused on the matter.

Please, stop embarrassing yourself.

Craig Wright has not applied, he did that months back. He has now been issued a fully vetted certificate of copyright by US Government Copyright office.  This can not be contested unless you have standing so this is it, game over, checkmate.

No, he didn't. You're referencing the coingeek article? It says nothing about that. Can you provide another source?

I saw, a few weeks ago, news with a lot of evidence that Satoshi Nakamoto lives in the United States. A man who refused to give any interview or see any reporter when they went looking for him. A man who was described by his own brother as an old nerd who has money but doesn't care a bit about it, thus maintaining a totally simple life (to the point that he still lives in his mother's house, even when he is over 50 years old). That news also commented something about Satoshi Nakamoto being his birth name in Japan, but when he moved to the United States with his parents, while still a child, he had to change his name according to the American laws of that time..
I still like way more that version of the story than this one about Craig Wright  :P

Indeed.

I'll just leave this here:

https://cocatalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?v1=3&ti=1,3&Search%5FArg=equity%20based&Search%5FCode=TALL&CNT=25&PID=jI9fB_21cgfzdEN5fsuVSd0vjoX2&SEQ=20190521153630&SID=2
https://archive.is/bYO4v
https://i.imgur.com/WGzAQeu.jpg

Turns out someone called Ronald Keala Kua Maria beat CSW to this particular nonsense stunt around 3 years ago - fill in a form, provide no evidence, and have your application registered. I don't remember anyone making a big deal of it then. I wonder why? ::)


By your logic, Ronald Keala Kua Maria is definitively Satoshi Nakamoto. Checkmate.

Pretty weird that the writer of the Bitcoin whitepaper waited so long to claim the copyright of what's his. Oh wait...

Registering a copyright apparently costs $35.


https://twitter.com/jerrybrito/status/1130812389048238080

Since you are unable to see the difference between Ronald Keala's application and Craig Wright's issued certificate let me point it out:

1. Image 1 - Ronald Keala Kua Maria's application:
https://i.imgur.com/8yFmBwH.png

2. Image 2 - Craig Wright's issued certificate:
https://i.imgur.com/N8HMjQZ.png

3. Image 3 - Craig Wright's second issued certificate:
https://i.imgur.com/VydnAW9.png

P.S. I pointed the most important part with color red ;)


Good Luck

In my opinion Craig Wright is 100% a liar. All the evidence he provided are falsified and not enough. Everything he says is completely contradictory to Satoshi's posts on this forum. If I'm wrong then Bitcoin is dead and also all current cryptocurrencies are, as noone wants to follow a person like him. Guy is screaming con-artist from 10 miles away. IF you wanna follow this person that's your head. If he proves he is Satoshi I'm quiting and I bet 99,99% of all these magnificent people on this forum will do the same. This person can only damage bitcoin and all crypto for his personal gain. He doesn't care about anything else except his own personal wealth and he uses any means legal or not to achieve it. His supporters are scammy too and should not be trusted.

That's great and all, but you are completely missing the point.

The point is that anyone who wishes to can fill in a form for a copyright claim, and it will be registered, as was done so by a random dude called Ronald 3 years ago. Everyone in this forum could fill in the form and we would all have bitcoin registered as our own. It means nothing.

The "Date of Creation" and "Date of Publication" that you are circling are irrelevant. There is a box (3a and 3b) on the form you submit (viewable here: https://www.copyright.gov/forms/formtx.pdf) which the claimant fills in the year of creation and publication. Those entries you have circled simply mimic whatever was entered in those boxes. They says nothing about those data being truthful or verified.

The entire stunt, just like everything to do with CSW, is pathetically laughable.

point is the REGISTRATION was in april.
no one contested it. thus no investigation/no verification process was needed. thus automatic rubber stamp changed
thus in may the C.O changed ownership from an anonymous pseudonym to a guy with a birth certificate.

now that certificate can be used to make many more false claim court cases and hope the defendants 'settle' early just to avoid having to prove its a false claim

lets word it another way.
it cost craig $35 to do this. but would cost someone else alot more now to contest it

your ronald example was registering a name and got it rubber stamped to some EQUITY thing that sounds like bitcoin.
its not the same situation as saying categorically the bitcoin whitepaper

if the ronald dude registered the whitepaper then craig did, then ronald could mess with craig.
but ronald registered for a "equity based peer to peer currency"

all your point is making is that i could register for a "asset based peer to peer currency"
all your point is making is that someone else could register for a "debt based peer to peer currency"
all your point is making is that someone else could register for a "scurity based peer to peer currency"

the ronald example has no point relating to the bitcoin whitepaper

maybe a point to make is if some american paid the $35 and got the name changed to:
satoshi and 'everyone under open licence'
rather than craig and see how easy it is to change that record to remove craigs name

This is a great cash mate the differences in the date have pointed out the abnormalities in the write up I have said without number before that Craig can never be santoshi if he truly is he could have come out to show evidence that no one will be able to deny. Bitcoin creator have remain anonymous and I know with time everybody will be clearfy on who is behind bitcoin.

Man...this brings me back to the time when I made a guy waste money on attempting to register a trademark for a name I was already using. The government is not good at vetting the information submitted. You can submit whatever you want as well as falsified documents to try and prove your first use or publication date. It essentially sticks as long as nobody challenges it. In my case, I actually filed for the trademark before I got this guy to waste his money. When he found out I had already registered first, he modified his application and created a fake flyer with a date on it before my first use date. He wasn't smart about it though because he used a well known font on the flyer that did not exist at the time he claimed.

BTW, Coin Legal Ltd owns the trademark to Bitcoin in a class for cryptocurrency and claims first use 20090112. It was registered July 27, 2018 and still living. All I can find on that company is mention of a single officer named Olof Kyros GUSTAFSSON. There are numerous others registered in other classes. Again, it means absolutely nothing other than that someone spent the money on it and nobody challenged it.

Trademarks and copyrights exist the moment it's first used or created in tangible form. The U.S. is a first to use country. Registering with the government only gives you certain legal rights. The real creator(s) wouldn't really even need to file copyrights or trademarks just due to widespread, worldwide, and well known use unless they wanted to sue people for monetary damages. They would already have common law ownership the moment they wrote the white paper, created the Bitcoin logo, etc.

do you think faketoshi is satoshi nakamoto? think a little:

If you create a coin as a bitcoin, and post it in a forum like bitcointalk, why would you disappear for a long time and after a long time you would come back with many excuses just to not show proof that you are satoshi?

look at the behavior of faketoshi, and look at what satoshi created, you realize that they are different people.

faketoshi is as a spoiled baby despaired by attention. a guy that remains anonymous is not someone desperate for attention, you can not see this?

Craig Wright Is Playing Three-Dimensional Checkers

https://www.coindesk.com/craig-wright-is-playing-three-dimensional-checkers

Craig Wright’s attempt to copyright the bitcoin white paper is a bold, if silly, move by a person who may be both of those things.

Copyright registration is a simple way of claiming ownership of a literary work, song, or piece of art. I could, for example, claim copyright over my exciting new musical “Bitcoin White Paper LIVE!” (shown below), a theatrical rendition of Satoshi Nakamoto’s seminal writing in the style of Rogers and Hammerstein. But should I?

No. That would be silly.

Clearly, Wright thought he should. As revealed Tuesday, in April he filed registrations of the white paper with the U.S. Copyright Office on behalf of, we learned, the Bitcoin Association and the suddenly popular BSV token.

To be fair, there’s a certain game-theoretical logic to Wright’s move. Suppose (humor me here) Wright is Satoshi, as he has claimed for years. Then his copyright should hold up against any court challenge, settling
once and for all the question of who Satoshi is… right?

If Wright isn’t Satoshi and the real Satoshi wants to claim copyright, she still would have to go to court and exhibit prior proof of authorship, which Twitter pumpers will say is also good for bitcoin somehow.

Finally, if Satoshi never shows up then Wright can do what he wants with the copyright, including sue others for infringement, who might then file countersuits to stop Wright from enforcing copyright.

Any of these scenarios will lead to little more than a few additional exciting headlines about bitcoin ownership in the mainstream media. We folks in the know will nod sagely and go on with our lives.

Speaking of nodding sagely, Star Wars fans will recognize this as an excellent opportunity to leave the old ways behind.

Just as a bolt of lightning destroyed the original Jedi texts in that tree on Blue Milk Island while Yoda hooted in ghost form, the same thing is now happening to the legend of Satoshi. Her technology and concepts have
moved far beyond the desires and whims of one anonymous author, Australian or not, and so we enter a new, post-Satoshi era today.

In fact, Satoshi no longer matters. Any way you slice this thala-siren bologna, we win.

I thought if I will just point it out with red circles it will be enough for you to see the difference(beside the Title of the claim itself) - the example you provided was just registered, while the example with CSW has this text:

And to be even more specific than that - this line specifically means it was approved by US Government Copyright Office and if you still want to indicate that anyone can claim anything and get registered by US G.C.O. I will point to the example you provided, it has passed to the US G.C.O and that is it, it does not have the response from authority, no "Regarding copyright claimant:".

I hope it is clear enough for you know.

I agree with you, I decline any evidence except for him to sign any of the addresses associated with Nakamoto, if he told us that he lost it, then game over for him it's unacceptable, this could end by only signing any wallet, we are using as proof of ownership here in Bitcointalk, he should also do that, I think Craig is just a fall guy.

Satoshi Nakamoto is still unknown and no one can prove who is,  but once they give a lot of proof that he is really Satoshi we will trust him.  But for the some proof I don't think he is Satoshi Nakamoto respect the decisiom of real Satoshi Nakamoto if they want private life. Because if he want to reveal his Idenity in the first place they show it to the public but probably not.

So does he lost all of his account passwords in this forum and github?
Has he lost all of his wallets private keys and bitcoins?
Satoshi tried to decentralized the works as much as possible. He created both this forum and the bitcoin.org but went on to transfer the ownership to others. If satoshi really wanted to come out, it would not have been this difficult.

The registration was filed in April. The registration was accepted in May. The copyright has NOT been granted. The only thing Wright has done is file paperwork. Nobody has awarded him a copyright, yet.

If Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto, then why he choose Chines name, and a huge people think that bitcoin is made by China. It is for me hilarious and confusing, and now i just quit to think who is Satoshi. Now I know bitcoin and i think it is enough that bitcoin give us profit.   

-1 Merit.

If the claims in the medium article are true and can be verified, specifically that he used his credit card to purchase the bitcoin.org domain in 2008, this would be very strong evidence that he is satoshi. I don't think these claims have been proven, and I was also previously under the impression that satoshi had used cash in the mail to pay for the domain registration/hosting.

The medium article also implies that CSW no longer has access to his private keys, and I generally believe this to be true considering satoshi has not spent any of his coins even after bitcoin reached ~$20K. Further evidence of this being true is satoshi not stepping in (with proof of who he is) to try to mediate the block size debate in 2014-2017 when things were very heated.

If CSW is in fact satoshi (he has done things to "prove" he is satoshi that I would consider fraudulent, so I am very skeptical), I would not automatically agree with everything he says, nor his stances of various crypto topics. I maintain my ability to think for myself. In fact I would disagree with many of his stances, including those that caused bitcoin cash to split SV to split off from BCH.

Honestly, I am too much sick and tired about this guy. Obviously, He's not telling the truth in short his a big LIAR.. Imagine, He is connecting his name to the founder and creator of bitcoin, even it is still anonymous,  for what? of course, craig want to be in the head line news in crypto world to get his name become popular. Well, congratulation to him but for not being He is Satoshi Nakamoto instead He is a great pretender and hypocrite guy, and I knew most of the community in bitcoin and crypto world believed on this things.

He paid for Bitcoin.org domain registration in 2009 with VISA and is on Australian Tax records.  

At the end of the day what matters is technology.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5145823.msg51164379#msg51164379

Evidence, please. Show me a link. Show anything.


Exactly. And at the end of the day, BSV is just a copy of BTC, so why would anyone use it?

Criag can never be satoshi. If so, why don't he use any of satoshi's known address to prove the identity with signing a message? I guess he is a shill only.

I am not a court to have access to peoples tax documents. Any court will accept Credit card payments and Australian Tax records as evidence.
A copy ? BTC BSV are light yeas apart as you can see on the link.



Signing address does not prove anything other that you have access now.
Credit card payments and tax records are court accepted proves , the later having the most weight.

Ok so you are taking a known pathological liar's word for it. That's your decision, but you can't expect everybody else to follow.


They are more closely related than just about any other pair of coins. They share a tremendous amount of blockchain information, in addition to lines of code, properties and structure.


Too bad Craig hasn't presented them to verify his claims.

I have to accept a courts decision, if I like it or not is a different matter.
For courts to come to a particular outcome they will look at facts which matter to them and not what bagholder A wants.

That is the biggest mystery of them all, why cannot he sign from his well know address and shut everything up rather than going a different route, if all these drama if the real Satoshi was alive he would have come forward and end these fictional characters by signing in from the genesis block and since we do not see any of that i have to assume he is no more.

For me, there are two possibilities concerning CSW :

-he has a link to Paul Calder Le Roux (who then would have to be the real Satoshi) and he's trying any way he can to get access to those keys, being helped by his pedo friend Calvin Ayre. He really believes he can crack them and is doing all that stuff (attention whoring) in the hope that one day he'll be able to say "I told you so".

-he has been hired by someone(s) to divert us from the real Satoshi... the only problem is he's a fucking idiot and no one with half a brain can believe he is Satoshi. Now he's just nothing more than a troll.

Either way, he's an idiot, an annoying one.

I have another theory. I don't think that Craig S Wright is the real Satoshi Nakamoto. But it is possible that he knows the real identity of Satoshi. And the reason why I think he suddenly came up with this claim, may be because of the death of the real Satoshi. He made the claim of him being Satoshi, fully knowing that the real Satoshi will not be there to counter him.

is more possible a comet to strike earth in the next 2 seconds rather this hoaxer scammer to be Satoshi.
This guy is a serious psychotic lunatic scammer and nothing more.
A reminder to everyone that this kind of persons before internet dominate and hoax people for decades.
Now only they can ridiculous their selves

I always wonder why people are too anxious to know the identity of who Satoshi Nakamoto is. Knowing the  identity of Satoshi Nakamoto will not add any relevant development to the entire crypto ecosystem... people just need to understand and know the true purpose for the creation of Bitcoin and the solutions it has brought to the entire financial ecosystem. 

Update (coindesk)

https://www.coindesk.com/us-copyright-office-says-it-does-not-recognize-craig-wright-as-satoshi?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=coindesk&utm_term=&utm_content=&utm_campaign=Organic%20

https://i.imgur.com/osL9RyP.png

Even as bitoin SV (BSV) enjoyed a Craig Wright/Satoshi bump Tuesday, the U.S. Copyright Office was hard at work dispelling notions that it officially “recognized” anyone as the inventor of bitcoin.

“As a general rule, when the Copyright Office receives an application for registration, the claimant certifies as to the truth of the statements made in the submitted materials. The Copyright Office does not investigate the truth of any statement made,” the Copyright Office wrote in a press release. “In a case in which a work is registered under a pseudonym, the Copyright Office does not investigate whether there is a provable connection between the claimant and the pseudonymous author.”

As multiple sources have already noted, all it takes to register a copyright is $55 and a stable internet connection. In short, any claim that the U.S. government has registered Wright as the author of bitcoin are spurious at best.

Why did the government go to the trouble of clarifying this point? Wright’s actions required it. On Tuesday, a press representative sent a widely read release that suggested, in short, that the government accepted Wright was Satoshi. From the release:

    Importantly, the registrations issued by the U.S. Copyright Office recognize Wright as the author – under the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto – of both the white paper and code. This is the first government agency recognition of Craig Wright as Satoshi Nakamoto, the creator of Bitcoin.

The U.S. Copyright Office, on the other hand, doesn’t actually recognize anyone for anything. Ultimately, it is a repository designed for protecting the creators of art and literature.

But it’s not an immutable source of truth, like, uhm…ok let’s not go there.

It seems to me that such an active proof that he is Satoshi pretty suspicious. I don't think the real Satoshi would do that. As mentioned above, what he said that he did not have time to prove something to someone if they do not believe it.

I do not look for the rightful inventor of BTC. If he wanted us to know him, he wouldn't have remained silent for sometime now. What I seek for is more money=BTC.
Dr Craig may be the true Satoshi, cool but I do not support his BSV because it can't give me the profit I want. Those who are in for the tech or whatever can keep researching into BTC and BSV codes which doesn't concern me any way :D.

In all honesty, i don't think the real Satoshi, an inventor of a groundbreaking technology that is more concerned about anonymously will fight so hard in public to be recognized ::)  
it doesn't sound like what the real satoshi will do, if satoshi doesn't want to be known  for so long, then why the sudden cry for recognition?
I expect Mr Satoshi to be bigger than this child's play.

This is a plausible theory although there's also a third option. CSW is trying to make money on attention whoring and his idea is to pose as Satoshi to get sponsors. Without this nobody would interview him and nobody would buy his coin and now he got a nice value pump on SV just because he filed for copyrights. He wouldn't exist in the media if not for his I'm satoshi drama.

Yeh he was so concerned about anonymity that he paid for Bitcoin.org domain with credit card in 2008 and got Australian Tax record for it.
Ah yeh he also copyrighted it because he wanted to stay anonymous.
Some peoples bags are definitive to big to carry, head is starved of oxygen.


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D7Gyy0_WsAM6RMk.jpg

Do you know the individual that passed and created the USD?

Do you know who passed and created the British Pound? Do you know anyone who initiated the Euro?

No one does. And no one cares. If the product works it speaks for itself.

It’s not important who Satoshi is!

https://twitter.com/cryptomanran/status/1131187521726156800

Meanwhile, in Bitcoin world:

https://bitcoinsv.io/2019/05/22/new-record-block-on-stn-stress-test/


https://bitcoinsv.io/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/block-table-ascending.png

Again, you offer zero evidence of this being true other than because a pathological liar said its true.


Meanwhile in the real world, the U.S. Copyright Office has completely debunked your earlier assertions:

https://www.coindesk.com/us-copyright-office-says-it-does-not-recognize-craig-wright-as-satoshi

Can you tell me the identity of the person behind the credit card used to pay for this bitcoin.org domain you talk about? am sure any credit card carries the information of the owner, and if this is the case there is no need to look any further, or for Mr Craig to cry out so loud for recognition, the bank which issue that card can rightly state who's identity is attached to the credit card, or even the Australian Tax record can also provide this information,
So i think it is easy to know know if CW is satoshi or not :-\

Craig Wright claimed the expenses for the bitcoin.org purchase on his tax in the 2008/2009 tax year.

That is also a fact.

Quote from the press release of the US Copyright Office:

Right, so the copyright office asked him if he was Satoshi, and he said "yes," and now its on record. Doesn't constitute proof of anything.

Perhaps if you read the whole press release, you would have realized that it pretty much says the exact opposite of what you or CSW wants it to.

https://www.copyright.gov/press-media-info/press-updates.html?loclr=twcop



In other words, the situation is exactly as nutildah explains. Nothing had been investigated, proven, or verified. CSW said "I am Satoshi" and someone else wrote that down. That's it.

This article seems to depict the case rather well in my opinion:  Craig Wright registers US copyright in Bitcoin 0.1 and the Bitcoin white paper — what this means (https://davidgerard.co.uk/blockchain/2019/05/21/craig-wright-registers-us-copyright-in-bitcoin-0-1-and-the-bitcoin-white-paper-what-this-means/).

Basically what it states is that:

- Registering under false claim comes pretty cheap, as the fine is a maximum of 2500 USD, lest he insist in court where fraud could be on the table.

- Bitcoin software was released under an open source MIT licence, and therefore you cannot sue for derivate usage since the licence allows it freely.

- Copyright registration cannot be challenged, although someone else could also claim copyrights to the same works, and then take it on up to court for conflicting claims.

- Copyright has weight to establish a presumption of fact when it occurs within the first five years of publication. He’s five years late in this case.

https://twitter.com/DumbestTweetHub/status/1131598221946392576

https://i.imgur.com/bdo56iY.jpg

A copyright can be maintained under a pseudonym.
Bitcoin version 0.1 was copyrighted from word go.

Anyone of the opinion that a court can not establish who paid for bitcoin.org domain registration in 2008 and has a tax record of it, is beyond hope.

Satoshi ‘Narcomoto’: Before Craig Wright, the Escobar Family Owned Bitcoin’s Trademark

https://www.ccn.com/satoshi-narcomoto-before-craig-wright-the-escobar-family-owned-bitcoins-trademark

"
Before Craig Wright, the Bitcoin trademark was registered to none other than the Escobar family. That’s according to official documents from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, which show Pablo Escobar’s brother, Roberto Escobar, as the former main signatory on Bitcoin’s naming rights."

What is the point in trying to prove you are Satoshi??? What is actually there to gain fron it??  I don't think it should be too difficult to prove you are a particular person if youvare indeed not faking.

I am not sure he is Satoshi Nakamoto, because there must be scientific proof to be able to confirm the truth. It may be necessary to match fingerprints with the devices used for the creation of bitcoin projects or other legacy evidence that can be recognized more forensically, such as DNA.
Everyone may be able to claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto, but that confession must be accompanied by valid evidence which is indisputable.

PGP or GTFO

I don't know how people can keep believing anything Ayre has to say at this point. Its cult-like behavior. Brainwashed mentality likely reinforced by heavy bags.


Same place he's always been. Though I do admit the whole saga is entertaining.


You're asking for a bit too much with the whole DNA thing. I would be happy with a publicly signed message from one of Satoshi's private keys, which Wright has so far been unable to provide.

If you want a list of evidence that suggests Wright is not Satoshi, its far longer than the list of evidence that suggests that he is:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5149062

Tomorrow, on Bloomberg, Dr. Craig Steven Wright on "60 Minutes".


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D7-UljOXYAEa3xM.jpg

even i can go there completely anonymous if i pay the proper amount of money

I seriously doubt that.

Can you prove me wrong?

i dont care as i dont care where this scammer hoaxer appear.
He has zero impact to Bitcoin even bitcoin price. Craig Wright is a well known scammer and he promote his shitcoin agenda with dozen of stolen  bitcoins. Nothing more nothing less.

I never believe that Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto, no matter how many proofs are there. My point of view is that even if he is Satoshi Nakamoto, why he did not disclose it before ? Why he remain hidden ?
Now i think it is very hard to believe anyone who claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto.

well, maybe it could be like that.  if the craig is satoshi, maybe the observers, journalists and TV media will be busy asking for their information directly.  but I consider this to be just information that will make bitcoin increasingly public, I hope there is a lot of positive side to this information, and not the other way around, it makes Bitcoin more cornered.

A person that tried so hard to keep his identity safe and didn't disclose any private info until the moment he quit, obviously has no reason to appear a few years later and behave like a cry-baby.

Unless he had a stroke.

Real Satoshi would never do all such things else would have done way back when it had reached the top and not now trying to just be the Satoshi . Also we are not sure if it is institution or an individual who had created this btc and this technology.

At the end there was not much choice as BTC steered further and further away from Bitcoin with junk segwit implementations and other protocol changes.
After the outing by the two magazine articles the only logical move was to jump in the driver seat again and steer it in the right direction.

This guy is able to persuade a lot of people, many people I've talked to believe this guy is 100 percennt the real deal.  Just goes to show how easily people are manipulated.  I'm not saying he wasn't around during the early days of bitcoin but other people were most likely doing the real development.

I believe this article (https://www.blockchain24.co/the-real-satoshi-i-dont-care-anymore/?utm_source=forum&utm_medium=refferal) is an excellent comment to all this threads about Satoshi identity...
It doesn't matter who he, or she, is. Bitcoin is not a religion, it don't need a prophet.

Craig wright lol NEXT! I am sick of all this craig thing. If he is really satoshi then he must prove it! It's so easy to prove. He can just sign a message on one of the wallet used by Satoshi before but he can't do that coz he is not satoshi!

Op Ed: How Many Wrongs Make a Wright? ...
- https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/op-ed-how-many-wrongs-make-wright/


Some useful links from ...

How to be a "Faketoshi", better than any other "Faketoshi" !?!
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5148607.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5148607.0)


...


 ::)

Agree. Besides, if Satoshi will ever reveal his/her identity, probably there will be many people who won't believe in it, cause Bitcoin have became so well known that it's already not possible to convince everyone to this. So, it would end up with some major divides in crypto society.
yep, it definitely starts to look like religion to me right now

So, how did this episode turn out? Did it have the worldwide transformative effecting the slobbering BSV fanatics thought that it would? I must have missed it. Oh, that's right, everybody missed it, because it didn't happen.

Much like how CSW being Satoshi never happened.

Does Satoshi Nakamoto still matter to everyone? I still wonder if he recognizes himself á Satoshi Nakamoto, why didn't he want people to know about he 10 years ago? Can anybody explain ?

Bitcoin pointed out to banker bailouts in the genesis block.  So people would think it is kind of like anti banker.
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Genesis_block (picture of the banker bailouts there)

Reading the first sentence of the white paper, it does become apparent it is anti current financial institution(fiat usd,cad,euro,yen etc)
https://twitter.com/ThugLifeBlazer/status/1138504762519949313 (it is in this picture)

So satoshi was taking on the biggest boys in the game, bigger than a nation, the banking systems of the nations. clearly in the white paper in the first sentence it state the purpose of bitcoin not to have to go through financial institutions but people still do, the second you change btc into fiat you are going through one. I have obtained many btc (never used fiat to buy them) and I have used many bitcoins to buy items (did not use fiat). So it is possible to use btc as it is intended.

So satoshi nakamoto was pretty much taking on the banks, People have been killed for less, but keep this in mind that it could all be reverse psychology and satoshi could be working for the IMF or FED.

satoshi did say in a email that he left the project to Gavin Andreson and it is in good hands
April 23 2011, said “I’ve moved on to other things. It’s in good hands with Gavin and everyone.”

Gavin Andreson admits to being a CIA informant.  So it could all be the reverse psychology like I said.
https://youtu.be/6pWblf8COH4?t=330

Either way bitcoin is much better than fiat, but we have a way to make something better than bitcoin and fiat now. It is just a matter of time before I plant enough minds seeds for it to work.

Just note bitcoin is in good hands of the CIA, let us be real the CIA is not good hands.
https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP90-00806R000201150052-5.pdf

A FUCKING 13YR OLD HAS TO TELL THEM

anyways CSW is not satoshi he a fucking moron poser.

if he is the real satoshi btc price going to plummet, hes nothing like the satoshi in the forum posts, that seemed like a humble guy. this craig seems like another donald trump type of moron lol :D

I don't really think he is the Satoshi Nakamoto, There are so many experts saying that. For sure they made their own research just to prove that Craig is not satoshi right. Even McAfee didn't say that Craig is satoshi. A lot of humor but still he can't use Satoshi first account here and move bitcoin from his wallet. If he manages to do that for sure almost all of the people in the crypto world will believe him.

The media just love this kind of controversy. If people hate him, even better, more attention they will receive. So here we are talking about bloomberg ;)

The case is becoming interesting.. Court ordered him to pay 5 billion dollars.. I read it today.. I'm confused, so did he ever actually have alot of bitcoins? does he currently even have one? did he claim to be satoshi just for attention and then got stuck having to pay money back he's never had? You can read more at

https://btcmanager.com/craig-wright-5-billion-bitcoin-fifty-percent-intellectual-property/?q=/craig-wright-5-billion-bitcoin-fifty-percent-intellectual-property/&q=/craig-wright-5-billion-bitcoin-fifty-percent-intellectual-property/&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=socialpush&utm_campaign=SNAP

I respect your aspirations to find someone who really is Satoshi Nakamoto. But my question is: why? Is this going to lead to something? It seems to me that it doesn’t matter who it is, Craig Wright or someone else, because it will not affect anything.

This Satoshi Nakamoto claiming never stops to be honest and i don't care for craig wright. Real Nakamoto never reveal himself in the public eye because of what he had done to bitcoin's success and for sure with bitcoin he has in his wallet he wants stay anonymous for life.

hal finney was part of team satoshi

I think this is the only news you are familiar with.
You should understand that the court gave him full power plus freedom to actually go and prove that he is Satoshi .
Unfortunately since he wasn't , he wasn't even able to prove anything also at the same time I think we all know how he stole coins from a person after he died .
This is so low.
I don't think I agree with you on this , this is a stupid news that am sure he paid to spread it so that he gets more people to stand up for him.

So if I can prove that I've bought a domain name for you, it means that I am you?
I guess that even CSW knows that US Court judges are not so stupid.

I don't know why all this trolling continues on and on really. It is clear that the only proof we'd accept is the cryptographic proof and this clown is unable to provide it.

I don't understand why are you still wasting your time with this scammer?it was so obvious from day one that he has nothing to do with satoshi and even if you were dumb enough back then to believe that he is the creator of Bitcoin there is so much evidence since then that proves this is a big lie.
Enough is enough with this idiot,Bitcoin community should move on and ignore him and his supporters.

The strangest thing out of this whole mess is: 1. Court says Craig Wright perjured. That means he lied. He submitted false documents. He faked shit. And then, against every bit of common sense I have as a normal human being, 2. People say the lies prove he is Satoshi.

How does logic work in crypto anyway?

What does he need the public to know him for/ even if they want to praise him and donate money for him, it still cannot be up to that whooping sum of 980,000 bitcoin that he has in his wallet, and seeing that alone is what keeps him company. If Craig claim to be satoshi, why has he not then proved that to the world by taking just 1 bitcoin out of the coin and donating it to the charity organization, but he can’t do that and yet he wants to be satoshi.

I think that the court has really even declared the judgment against him and he is now officially declared to be a scammer and this will hunt him for the rest of his life because no friend and family would want to do any business with him thinking that he will defraud them also. I think that we should close the chapter of this guy now because he is a forgotten fellow already.

Only a small fraction of the cryptocurrency users are having a great deal of knowledge about the Blockchain technology and Bitcoin. So it is not difficult to brainwash the remaining users with propaganda. Craig Wright and his goons have created enough confusion in the minds of ordinary cryptocurrency users, to sway at least 5-10% of them to believe that he is the real Satoshi.

2 Billion of tax payments for Ira, thats a lot of BTC to sell
https://modernconsensus.com/cryptocurrencies/bitcoin/exclusive-interview-with-craig-wright-just-after-ordered-to-pay-5-billion-in-bitcoin/

That Judge was Epsteins attorney for 7 years and in 2015 defended him on TV as "legal expert and former US. prosecutor" and not as his attorney.
That is very deceptive, not what you would expect form a Judge.
https://modernconsensus.com/cryptocurrencies/bitcoin/judge-in-craig-wright-lawsuit-once-quit-as-us-attorney-to-work-for-jefferey-epstein/

Why do you keep rehashing this nonsense? According to the in-court version of your friend Craig, he can't access the bitcoin, so he can't give it to the Kleiman estate. He can't access the bitcoin because as the judge said, the Tulip Trust never existed. Craig has no coins, ergo Kleiman has no coins. Craig is still on the hook for $5 billion though.


I asked you this question in the BSV thread after you posted the same thing there, and you completely ignored it:


Care to answer it now?

Care to answer it now?
What ruling, there is no ruling. The only thing certain Craig Wright has to pay some legal fees.


in more detail here in the miami herald
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/article232595847.html

Let me dictionary (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ruling) that for you:


A court order (which this was) is a specific type of ruling.

In addition to having to pay for the plaintiff's legal expenses, the judge RULED that:


More words from the judge:


What this basically means is that the judge nuked Craig's whole defense because he was full of shit. Therefore, the plaintiff wins.

A federal judge ruled this in a federal court.


I ask you again: what does this have to do with anything?

How does it negate the judge's findings that Craig is a fraud? And by the way, the judge did call Craig "fraudulent." Look it up for yourself:

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.277.0.pdf

In future you will have your work cut out sticking up for that child rape supporting judge. In legal circles its just about unheard of for a judge to retire to join the accused legal team taking with him his inside knowledge of the case. Average Joe does not take kind to this they have kids at home, just saying.

A recommendation is not a ruling.
https://youtu.be/fIbMQl895hQ
the article
https://coingeek.com/bitstocks-tv-analyzes-the-kleiman-v-wright-case-bad-news-for-btc/


Whats progress has been made with the critical vulnerabilities found in Lightning Network software where users will lose funds.

It is, especially in this case.

lawprose.org/lawprose-lesson-165-ruling-vs-opinion-vs-judgment-etc/


Even your pedo friend Calvin Ayre said it was a "ruling (https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1166598878600290305)," even if he of course misinterpreted it for his own financial gain, because that's what he does best.


Coingeek completely abandoned any aspirations to be a reputable news source when they said the USPTO declared Wright was Satoshi. This was utterly false and they lost any remaining respect they might have had among freethinking people at that point.


Your nonsensical FUD is completely off-topic.

Next.

Maybe you should ask Calvin why he likes to hang out with girls who are still wearing braces then if you're so concerned about kids...

https://i.imgur.com/GpXETvb.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/6EV6wZq.jpg


https://www.casinomeister.com/forums/threads/wsop-school-girls-calvin-ayre.37705/

https://i.imgur.com/R11vkMA.png


 ::)

I have to quote myself again...

For the lazy ones

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EDSl41TWkAAsxok?format=png&name=900x900

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EDSl5M6W4AEQUs6?format=png&name=small

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EDSl5jvWsAEGoHo?format=jpg&name=small

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EDSl56eXoAAjMIC?format=png&name=small

I believe that the creator, the impostor of bitcoin, Craig S. Wright, himself personally confirmed his fraudulent intentions when at a hearing in a federal court in West Palm Beach he admitted that he could not comply with the court order, which refers to Craig  a list of all their bitcoin addresses, as well as access to cryptocurrency.

To be honest Craig Wright has lost his reputation and now no ones believe on him. Before claiming to be satoshi,  he was still being heard by the people and people believe on this statements and predications.
But this Satoshi thing was a pure false statement and it was taken very badly by the bitcoin community.  Now he is rightly have to face the court of law for his false claim.

Craig Wright Aims to Challenge Court Decision That Cost Half His Bitcoins

Craig Wright says bad weather means he needs more time to challenge a court order that he must hand over half of his bitcoin holdings.  ::)

https://www.coindesk.com/craig-wright-aims-to-challenge-court-decision-that-cost-half-his-bitcoins?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=coindesk&utm_term=&utm_content=&utm_campaign=Organic%20

When claim what is not yours there is always a consequence and I believe he will be regretting right now where ever he is and we only need proof of his signature on the block mined and just 1btc move from satoshi wallet to well know wallet .