Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto - Evidence Here

[Anonylz]

In all honesty, i don't think the real Satoshi, an inventor of a groundbreaking technology that is more concerned about anonymously will fight so hard in public to be recognized  
it doesn't sound like what the real satoshi will do, if satoshi doesn't want to be known  for so long, then why the sudden cry for recognition?
I expect Mr Satoshi to be bigger than this child's play.

[pixie85]

For me, there are two possibilities concerning CSW :

-he has a link to Paul Calder Le Roux (who then would have to be the real Satoshi) and he's trying any way he can to get access to those keys, being helped by his pedo friend Calvin Ayre. He really believes he can crack them and is doing all that stuff (attention whoring) in the hope that one day he'll be able to say "I told you so".

-he has been hired by someone(s) to divert us from the real Satoshi... the only problem is he's a fucking idiot and no one with half a brain can believe he is Satoshi. Now he's just nothing more than a troll.

Either way, he's an idiot, an annoying one.

This is a plausible theory although there's also a third option. CSW is trying to make money on attention whoring and his idea is to pose as Satoshi to get sponsors. Without this nobody would interview him and nobody would buy his coin and now he got a nice value pump on SV just because he filed for copyrights. He wouldn't exist in the media if not for his I'm satoshi drama.

[ðºÞæ]

In all honesty, i don't think the real Satoshi, an inventor of a groundbreaking technology that is more concerned about anonymously will fight so hard in public to be recognized  
it doesn't sound like what the real satoshi will do, if satoshi doesn't want to be known  for so long, then why the sudden cry for recognition?
I expect Mr Satoshi to be bigger than this child's play.

Yeh he was so concerned about anonymity that he paid for Bitcoin.org domain with credit card in 2008 and got Australian Tax record for it.
Ah yeh he also copyrighted it because he wanted to stay anonymous.
Some peoples bags are definitive to big to carry, head is starved of oxygen.

[MrFreeRoMan]

Do you know the individual that passed and created the USD?

Do you know who passed and created the British Pound? Do you know anyone who initiated the Euro?

No one does. And no one cares. If the product works it speaks for itself.

It’s not important who Satoshi is!

https://twitter.com/cryptomanran/status/1131187521726156800

[HardFireMiner]

[HardFireMiner]

Meanwhile, in Bitcoin world:

https://bitcoinsv.io/2019/05/22/new-record-block-on-stn-stress-test/

So the team began incrementing the cap in successive cycles. The end result was better than hoped for, after seeing how robustly 0.2.0 handled 1GB the decision was taken to push past the initial target. The test ended with a 1.424GB block containing 359,793 transactions.  At this point some degradation of services like block explorers was observed.  The Bitcoin SV nodes handled things ok and probably could have been pushed further but the Stresstest team and the nChain team both needed some sleep.

The following table shows some of the more notable blocks from the test period:

[nutildah]

Yeh he was so concerned about anonymity that he paid for Bitcoin.org domain with credit card in 2008 and got Australian Tax record for it.

Again, you offer zero evidence of this being true other than because a pathological liar said its true.

Meanwhile, in Bitcoin world:

Meanwhile in the real world, the U.S. Copyright Office has completely debunked your earlier assertions:

https://www.coindesk.com/us-copyright-office-says-it-does-not-recognize-craig-wright-as-satoshi

[Anonylz]

In all honesty, i don't think the real Satoshi, an inventor of a groundbreaking technology that is more concerned about anonymously will fight so hard in public to be recognized  
it doesn't sound like what the real satoshi will do, if satoshi doesn't want to be known  for so long, then why the sudden cry for recognition?
I expect Mr Satoshi to be bigger than this child's play.

Yeh he was so concerned about anonymity that he paid for Bitcoin.org domain with credit card in 2008 and got Australian Tax record for it.
Ah yeh he also copyrighted it because he wanted to stay anonymous.
Some peoples bags are definitive to big to carry, head is starved of oxygen.

Can you tell me the identity of the person behind the credit card used to pay for this bitcoin.org domain you talk about? am sure any credit card carries the information of the owner, and if this is the case there is no need to look any further, or for Mr Craig to cry out so loud for recognition, the bank which issue that card can rightly state who's identity is attached to the credit card, or even the Australian Tax record can also provide this information,
So i think it is easy to know know if CW is satoshi or not

[HardFireMiner]

In all honesty, i don't think the real Satoshi, an inventor of a groundbreaking technology that is more concerned about anonymously will fight so hard in public to be recognized  
it doesn't sound like what the real satoshi will do, if satoshi doesn't want to be known  for so long, then why the sudden cry for recognition?
I expect Mr Satoshi to be bigger than this child's play.

Yeh he was so concerned about anonymity that he paid for Bitcoin.org domain with credit card in 2008 and got Australian Tax record for it.
Ah yeh he also copyrighted it because he wanted to stay anonymous.
Some peoples bags are definitive to big to carry, head is starved of oxygen.

Can you tell me the identity of the person behind the credit card used to pay for this bitcoin.org domain you talk about? am sure any credit card carries the information of the owner, and if this is the case there is no need to look any further, or for Mr Craig to cry out so loud for recognition, the bank which issue that card can rightly state who's identity is attached to the credit card, or even the Australian Tax record can also provide this information,
So i think it is easy to know know if CW is satoshi or not

Craig Wright claimed the expenses for the bitcoin.org purchase on his tax in the 2008/2009 tax year.

That is also a fact.

[HardFireMiner]

Yeh he was so concerned about anonymity that he paid for Bitcoin.org domain with credit card in 2008 and got Australian Tax record for it.

Again, you offer zero evidence of this being true other than because a pathological liar said its true.

Meanwhile, in Bitcoin world:

Meanwhile in the real world, the U.S. Copyright Office has completely debunked your earlier assertions:

https://www.coindesk.com/us-copyright-office-says-it-does-not-recognize-craig-wright-as-satoshi

Quote from the press release of the US Copyright Office:

In the case of the two registrations issued to Mr. Wright, during the examination process, the Office took note of the well-known pseudonym “Satoshi Nakamoto,” and asked the applicant to confirm that Craig Steven Wright was the author and claimant of the works being registered. Mr. Wright made that confirmation. This correspondence is part of the public registration record.

[nutildah]

Quote from the press release of the US Copyright Office:

In the case of the two registrations issued to Mr. Wright, during the examination process, the Office took note of the well-known pseudonym “Satoshi Nakamoto,” and asked the applicant to confirm that Craig Steven Wright was the author and claimant of the works being registered. Mr. Wright made that confirmation. This correspondence is part of the public registration record.

Right, so the copyright office asked him if he was Satoshi, and he said "yes," and now its on record. Doesn't constitute proof of anything.

[o_e_l_e_o]

Perhaps if you read the whole press release, you would have realized that it pretty much says the exact opposite of what you or CSW wants it to.

https://www.copyright.gov/press-media-info/press-updates.html?loclr=twcop

the claimant certifies as to the truth of the statements made in the submitted materials. The Copyright Office does not investigate the truth of any statement made.

In a case in which a work is registered under a pseudonym, the Copyright Office does not investigate whether there is a provable connection between the claimant and the pseudonymous author.

In other words, the situation is exactly as nutildah explains. Nothing had been investigated, proven, or verified. CSW said "I am Satoshi" and someone else wrote that down. That's it.

[DdmrDdmr]

This article seems to depict the case rather well in my opinion: Craig Wright registers US copyright in Bitcoin 0.1 and the Bitcoin white paper — what this means.

Basically what it states is that:

- Registering under false claim comes pretty cheap, as the fine is a maximum of 2500 USD, lest he insist in court where fraud could be on the table.

- Bitcoin software was released under an open source MIT licence, and therefore you cannot sue for derivate usage since the licence allows it freely.

- Copyright registration cannot be challenged, although someone else could also claim copyrights to the same works, and then take it on up to court for conflicting claims.

- Copyright has weight to establish a presumption of fact when it occurs within the first five years of publication. He’s five years late in this case.

[kenzawak]

https://twitter.com/DumbestTweetHub/status/1131598221946392576

[ðºÞæ]

A copyright can be maintained under a pseudonym.
Bitcoin version 0.1 was copyrighted from word go.

Anyone of the opinion that a court can not establish who paid for bitcoin.org domain registration in 2008 and has a tax record of it, is beyond hope.

Dr. Craig says "I registered with the U.S. Copyright Office so that I can confirm my authorship and copyright ownership, and start teaching people the true meaning of what Bitcoin is about and stop people twisting the narrative"

[MrFreeRoMan]

[kenzawak]

Satoshi ‘Narcomoto’: Before Craig Wright, the Escobar Family Owned Bitcoin’s Trademark

https://www.ccn.com/satoshi-narcomoto-before-craig-wright-the-escobar-family-owned-bitcoins-trademark

"
Before Craig Wright, the Bitcoin trademark was registered to none other than the Escobar family. That’s according to official documents from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, which show Pablo Escobar’s brother, Roberto Escobar, as the former main signatory on Bitcoin’s naming rights."

[sngwinner]

What is the point in trying to prove you are Satoshi??? What is actually there to gain fron it??  I don't think it should be too difficult to prove you are a particular person if youvare indeed not faking.

[HardFireMiner]

I ask you again - where is your God now?

[zee11225]

What is the point in trying to prove you are Satoshi??? What is actually there to gain fron it??  I don't think it should be too difficult to prove you are a particular person if youvare indeed not faking.

I am not sure he is Satoshi Nakamoto, because there must be scientific proof to be able to confirm the truth. It may be necessary to match fingerprints with the devices used for the creation of bitcoin projects or other legacy evidence that can be recognized more forensically, such as DNA.
Everyone may be able to claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto, but that confession must be accompanied by valid evidence which is indisputable.