Bitcoin Forum

See the Rating of TOP 20 Cryptocurrency Sportsbooks here: http://100bookies.com/cryptocurrency-sportsbooks-eng/

It looks like this now:

BetCoin - http://100bookies.com/betcoin-review/
Cloudbet - http://100bookies.com/cloudbet-review/
Bitsler - http://100bookies.com/bitsler-review/
FortuneJack - http://100bookies.com/fortunejack-review/
BC.game- http://100bookies.com/bc-game-review/
Stake - http://100bookies.com/stake-review/
Roobet - http://100bookies.com/roobet-review/
NitroBetting - http://100bookies.com/nitrobetting-review/
Duelbits - http://100bookies.com/duelbits-review/
Wolf.bet - http://100bookies.com/wolf-bet-review/
BetFury - http://100bookies.com/betfury-review/
Vave - http://100bookies.com/vave-review/
Shuffle - http://100bookies.com/shuffle-review/
CryptoRush - http://100bookies.com/cryptorush-review/
Gamdom - http://100bookies.com/gamdom-review/
Rollbit - http://100bookies.com/rollbit-review/
Rainbet - http://100bookies.com/rainbet-review/
DuckDice - http://100bookies.com/duckdice-review/
Chips.gg - http://100bookies.com/chips-gg-review/
Rocketpot - http://100bookies.com/rocketpot-review/

Please note down the parametera based kn which you have rated the websites. Otherwise it literally no sense for anyone to belive in your ratings.

Also have you considered user's feedback while rating a website??

Unfortunately, it is impossible to make a rating that will suit all players, as each player considers their favorite bookmakers the best. Therefore, our rating is also not perfect. It is based on a combination of different parameters, which take into account both the opinions of betting business experts and the information about places of betting websites in the global Internet traffic by data Alexa.com. The last parameter is quite accurate and allows you to indirectly assess the popularity of bookmakers in the opinion of the players themselves.

Agree that Nitrogen is #1 and Betcoin #2. I'm not a big fan of 1xbit or Cloudbet but as you pointed out, all ratings guides will be somewhat different.

I guess you are not a big fan of 1xbit because of the accusation they got. My opinion is the same about the ratings of sportsbook as it all depends on every person if they decide that the sportsbook they choose is the best sportsbook while the other think that there is another sportsbook that they ever place bets.

Do this rating is just basing on personal choice? and why Betking is included?

As far as the website stated:

"The TOP 100 Bookies comprehensive Ranking System is based on a combination of expert appraisal from the best in the betting business and in-depth web analytics from a number of reputable sources."

I just don't know what are these "REPUTABLE" sources since looks like they missed something or take everything in "general".

OP is clearly promoting the site. However, I see that their feature of providing advantages and disadvantages on a certain sportsbook might be a good reference to others.

BetKing will be soon removed from our rating, as they do not have a sportsbook on their site already. The problem is simply that it is not yet possible to replace it, as at the moment there are still not enough worthy bookmakers to complete the TOP 20 list.

How did you finally come up with the rating A to C-?
Is it based from the "reputable" sources that you mentioned on the site?



Yes, I agree that the list of advantages as well as disadvantages is a good reference for some users here.
Though NitrogenSports got the top spot from your list, yet, they are only accepting bitcoin at the moment.
They should start accepting other popular altcoins though.

First of all, we mean here the Alexa.com site, which gives accurate information about the places of the bookmaker websites in the global Internet traffic. Also, when compiling our rating, we took into account the data of other well-known sportsbook ratings, opinions of betting business experts and player reviews. In any case keep in mind that  our rating is not ideal and not final, it will continue to evolve and improve.

Good to know that you are clarifying anything is being asked out.People would normally react to things specially when they do saw the rankings
isn't really suit out in their taste yet most people do have experience on using up any sportsbook and that's why rankings is much more better to be done
with a Poll which community would able to choose up.

Take a look into these threads:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5040737.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1820529.0

Very good website you have. It is mobile friendly but, banner placement are looking awkward. I did read those detailed information about each website. I must say very nicely written. Good job.

What I wanted to know is on what basis are you eating these websites? Is it customer reviews, revenue generation, user base or customer poll. This part should be made clear by adding an about page on your website.

It would be very easy for people like us to search on your website using the search bar, if you could actually put on the top of your sidebar. I found it a bit annoying at the end of the banner.

Also adding star rating based on user inputs will be a great idea. 🙂

As the list goes down, I feel like you just threw sites on it because you didnt know any others. You should have a list of all the ones that did not make it on.

He probably rated them based on their alexa ranking and individual reviews spread out here and there which seems legit since Nitrogen and Cloudbet are 2 of my favorite sportsbooks and they are on top of the rankings.

I doubt it. He clearly seems to have done his research. I don't see any big players missing here. Which ones are you talking about? Nitrogen, Cloudbet, Onehash, Sportsbet etc are all there.

Thank you for your comments, we will try to take this into account to improve the site. However, we do not always have the opportunity to change all the marked elements at the request of users.

Also on our site there is a rating by the voices of the players, but there are in general all known bookmakers (including Fiat), and not just cryptocurrency sportsbooks: http://100bookies.com/interactive-poll-where-do-you-bet/

I see you have given Sportsbet.io the rating of 'B'. One of the disadvantage in review section of Sportsbet.io says that it is 'Relatively young Sportsbook'.
But Sportsbet is online since 2016 which in my opinion is decent time in gambling business. Moreover, Sportsbet.io recently entered into deal with Premier League club, Watford which makes them official sponsor of Watford for 3 years. The deal is estimated to be worth £20-25M. I don't think there exists any other sportsbook which spent amount that high in marketing. It clearly placed SportsBet.io ahead others in both competitiveness and trustworthiness. I would suggest you to reconsider review of Sportsbet. Regards!

Thanks for your comment! We will try to revise it in the future. The fact is that many of the reviews on our site have not been updated for several years, so most likely they are a bit outdated. On our site more than 400 sportsbooks are represented in general, so often we simply do not have time to follow the changes in the work of individual bookmakers.

Not really sure how you could possible say that Bitcoin Rush is better than FortuneJack, I mean.... Come on.

Also, your website design is absolutely disgusting, how can we trust your reviews are credible when you can't even see that your website looks like it was made by an amateur.

You may want to consider updating your reviews before starting a thread with outdated ratings.    Some of the sportsbooks you rate are not in business anymore. 

We have a fairly simple and clear approach to the evaluation of new sportsbooks. So, for all new bookmakers, we initially assign a rating of "C-". However, if a well-known and trusted brand is behind the recently opened bookmaker, then in this case we can assign it a rating  "C" immediately. This is what happened on our website as a result with FortuneJack.

(!) I want to remind that we present the rating of bookmakers, and not a casinos.

Therefore, in this case, an estimate was given only to the sportsbook section of FortuneJack, and not to the whole site as a whole. FortuneJack Sportsbook was opened just a few months ago, so it cannot yet have a rating higher than "C-". And just for the well-known name of its brand, it was immediately rated half a point higher. In any case, this assessment is not final and may be revised over time. Bitcoin Rush we know for a long time, so it is rated higher.

We have negative feedback of betking in this forum and some user on their gambling sites said "they could not make withdrawal" I don't really know what is in him mind for rating them. I also believe that op only make the reviews base on the personal judgment and he really did not used basic review tools. Very nice work anyway!

I think there are levels of hate towards betking, I would totally understand the hate for gamblers who are trying to withdraw and can't but I haven't seen that happen way too much, maybe it happens and that is horrible too and I would be glad to hear that people are coming out against it and if there are proofs they should put it on the forum and show that as a reason to put a negative trust to them.

However, the main problem with them occurred when they did their own ICO and their currency promised a lot of things yet they failed to provide those things, giving promises on an ICO and then not making them a reality was the biggest problem if you ask me, they made sure they got their own currency back far cheaper than they sold it and trying to brag about how "they didn't promise any price points" because they are capable of ruining the worth of coin themselves they see it as a regular coin price change.

They most often pay minimal attentions to all those details. They are more interested in there site getting more views when most of there ratings might be similar to those of other websites.
Rating of cryptocurrency sport booking site should not be done by every one if you can find a good rating or had seen one before you can just post the link here or on your site there are benefits in being different

It's been a while since seeing a rating website.
Are these ratings based on your jurisdiction?
Have you considered user's users feedback on the particular site?
Moreover can you just justify how you have ranked the sites?
It's better to be transparent here in this place  , else people won't believe in your ratings.

In drawing up the ratings, we use an integrated approach: to evaluate the sportsbooks we take the opinions of the betting business experts and players feedback, as well as information about the websites of the bookmakers in global Internet traffic according to Alexa Rank (alexa.com). Despite this, it is impossible to make a rating that all users would agree with, since each individual player considers his favorite bookmakers the best.

The rating is just a guide to all users out there but it doesn't mean that those are considered to be the ultimate rating of those sportsbooks. You are right, you can't satisfy every single user with the ratings presented. What they can do, is try those sportsbooks and evaluate on his own. Anyway, they are not forced to believe all the information provided, just a rating to get a glimpse of those sites. It is up to them how they will use each of them.

I agree to you dude this is a guide to know will gambling site is the legit or not if the owner reputation is good or bad but its up to you if you take a risk for those gambling site that have a lot of problem and issues thats a reason we need to check first if the website have a problem before doing any action.

you might be right but having 1xbit listed only means you care about the referral money , I doubt that you even use all of these sites
how on earth can you put a scam website in #3 , alex ranking ? you know Alexa ranking has nothing to do with the actual ratings right ?

THEY DON"T PAY WINNERS

that's a fact and at any stage they will lock you out of your account and refuse to pay you your money


the whole ranking thing is so wrong IMO but don't want to discuss it , seeing nitro on #1 while you can 100% of the times find better odds in other sites explain the whole thing

but having 1xbit listed is so wrong

Each bookmaker has some drawbacks. 1xBit is represented in the rating, as it is a cryptocurrency sportsbook. In addition, they have the best line and the most modern website (service) in the betting industry, therefore, they have every right to be listed on our list. Moreover, their disadvantages are listed in the review on our website. So to play there or not let everyone decide for himself as a result. Our main mission is to show you a list of all possible bookmakers, which, I am sure, many have not even heard. However, players must make the final choice themselves.

indeed they have the best lines , but what makes them special since they can freeze your account at any moment ??
until now all the people I know that used 1xbit ended having their account closed and their money stuck in that scam site

odds and lines don't mean a thing if the bookie won't pay you

1xbit doesn't have the best line. They also use two sets of lines. Winning players get a second set of lines with even higher margins. I'm not sure what the exact criteria is to get the second line.

for the popular and top leagues no they don't , but they have a lot of betting options that aren't available in the other bitcoin bookies
you can find whatever you want to bet there , also they offer a lot more leagues and competitions as well and you can find any match easily there

if they weren't scam they would be my #1 book actually

But it still shows that site has some issues there which is never reccomend to show it public, especially when it is for new players to read. This will mislead so many new players to be wrong in choosing a good and a bad one. I do not even believe in some kind of this reviews, better to check direcly on the thread as well instead of believing something like this.

Is this the real top 20 ctypto sportsbooks & this is already updated?

It's not the real top 20, his rating is based off from different factors which you can find in the first page of the thread and it's not fully updated since you can still see old sites listed below that stopped operating.

If you're looking for a good sportsbook you should look for other lists or try each one out first imo.

It is the most progressive rating of cryptocurrency bookmakers at the moment, which you can find on the Internet. Of course, it is not ideal yet, but we are constantly improving and supplementing it with new sportsbooks. In addition, we making ratings of bookmakers for quite long time, so we understand this topic very well.

if you are a new player, i think you should not look for only one rating site. there are other threads or sites discussing crypto sportsbooks.
and most reviews are paid, so you cant really rely their authenticity. if you want to test a specific sportsbook, use a small amount of money and assess whats gonna happen.
some feedbacks also are case to case basis. there are reasons why they are encountering such issues. so we cant generalise whats the image of a sportsbook by few feedbacks. some good reviews are not recorded as a matter of fact

It isnt really that necessary for you to risk up anytime some money to spend on even how small it is which there are persons who dont really like to risk up anything unless if those things are already legit ones.
You can always have the spare time to read up and find feedbacks because looking for those informations wont really cost an arm and leg as long you do know that your money is at risk.

First I would like to say that you should optimize your websites for mobile devices. And secondly, how did you come up with these ratings, you just rated the ones you liked good and the others bad I guess. Did you consider getting information from those who have made use of the sites or have you yourself made use of these sites before rating them? You need to prove it before can take you serious. And you didn’t even leave any review about them, just a list and no description at all. There are some sites that you gave a good rating that doesn’t deserve it, because I have seen lots of complaints about them.

Thanks for your advice, we will try to fix it in the future. Unfortunately, we do not have the opportunity to test all the sites of sportsbooks on our own, except perhaps some of them. Therefore, for evaluation, we use in some cases indirect data, which include a general inspection of sites: the site’s age, information about license, the number of sports, the number of types and betting options, the level of odds, a list of available payment methods, feedback methods and many others. We also take into account player reviews and other information about sites on the Internet. In addition, we also take into account information about sites traffic according to Alexa Rank, which informs about their popularity directly among the players themselves. Thus we get a comprehensive assessment as a result.

Thank you for your feedback, thanks to which the review of Sportsbet.io was recently revised and updated: http://100bookies.com/sportsbet-io-review/

I disagree with most of what's written about Sportsbet but the most glaring is that for all intents and purposes, they are a fiat book and not bitcoin only. They accept Skrill, Neteller and other forms of deposit.

Now or in the past.

1xBet/1xBit - Liverpool FC and FC Barcelona (Both current)
Betway – West Ham United
Bet365 – Stoke City
Dafabet – Sunderland
TLCBEt – West Bromwich Albion
138 Bet – Watford

good job. There is a similar theme but with poker? rating of poker rooms with freerolls.

There are not many popular crypto sportsbooks out there that offer pvp poker, but I recommend Fair.poker since I have checked it out recently and it seems like a decent website which will continue improving over time.

I usually stick to playing poker on sites like Bodog which are FIAT based sportsbooks and accept BTC deposits and withdrawals.

You mean that fair.poker new site which doesnt have any players? Their site design isnt really that good at all.

I would rather prefer on using up SWC than on this one.

Nitrogensports and Betcoin both have poker rooms.

Don't go about searching for list of top poker gambling site or any other gambling site so many out there are inaccurate and easily land you into deep trouble. Let it be known to you some site are paid by gambling site to rate them high on there list

Thank you, this is also corrected.

Me only agree to the top 1 and 2 but about 1xbit I read someone complaining that sites because he can't withdraw his winninh funds. 

I think one of the most important information you can impart to players is whether or not the bookie uses kyc,
be a lot more informative than saying, "this site has an amazing layout".
Having said that, I think you have done a very good job with your site.

Actually people reviews is sometimes can't be trusted until you really test it by yourselves. You can see betcoin.ag itself that when I played on there, I never have any problems with it, although the withdrawal takes times but overall they always paying. But after some period of times, issues is coming towards them and proven that they are really a scam site. So if you do not dig it deeper how are you suppose to know that they are a scam site? Luckily, I do not spend much on their site afterwards. You can check on reviews but at least you should test it before judge

Ratings is only other people comments or experienced Im not looking for the ratings to know what is best and more trusted sportsbooks.
If I think what is sportsbook I rate it if I already play there and I see their service is really good . Not all the ratings is all true because that's not 100 accurate.  That is only a guide of the newbie player who are looking in sportabooks.

As a rule, cryptocurrency sportsbooks should not require verification (kyc). However, sometimes there are exceptions, as in the case with 1xBit. Therefore, in general, it is difficult to track, since this is not a mandatory rule and is often carried out quite selectively.

In principle, every bookmaker can create problems for players if they abuse his loyalty. Therefore, the main thing when playing on the website of any sportsbook is not to violate generally accepted rules and not to abuse the prohibited methods of the game.

Almost all sportsbooks have any drawbacks, so it is difficult to find the perfect betting site. Our main task is to provide players with a choice and the minimum necessary information about sportsbooks for comparison. The final choice, in any case, remains with the players.

@sporbettor better you chould change also the title because I saw now is top 10 cryptocurrency sportsbook not 20.

I recommend also to you that better if you should uodatinc this thread because we know that not all the time the gambling sites are still operating others are closed and not good to play it is only my suggestion so a player can choose what is sportbooks is the best for them.

In fact, there are 20 cryptocurrency sportsbooks there, you will see this if you follow the link (http://100bookies.com/sportsbooks-that-accept-cryptocurrency-eng/). In any case, thanks for your comment.

Recently, there have been some changes in our rating, see the updated rating of the best Cryptocurrency Sportsbooks at this link: http://100bookies.com/best-cryptocurrency-sportsbooks-eng/

I checked your updated ratings and I disagree with a couple of them. Why is Nitrobetting in the 2nd spot? They have clearly dropped in popularity rankings in recent times due to the accusations against them.

They should be ranked lower in the list in my opinion. Also, why is 1xbit part of the top 10? This is a scam site which shouldn't be added in any ranking list.

It is actually quite difficult to please everyone on this site, as each player has their own sportsbook rating. As for Nitrogen, it should be noted that it has been the best for a long time, so it still has every right to occupy high places in the ratings of cryptocurrency sportsbooks. And 1xbit has a rather low rating on our site (C), which by itself signals a low level of trust in this brand.

Which can be and is spread by their competitors. Anyone can spread any type of information including negative ones on the internet, not saying about big businesses do this every day. I personally bet on both 1xBit and 1xBet for years, they provide everything that one legit online betting platform can possibly offer.

I appreciate this one since most of the time such platforms treat individual players in the way they actually do. Betting "experts", "influencers" might say any shit for the money.

I understand what you are trying to convey, but you are ignoring some key points here. Nitrogen hasn't been the best for a long time now. Sportsbet, Stake etc are way better in comparison.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=88706

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2835882

Above links indicate the issues related to both sportsbooks which is why I suggested lowering the rank of Nitrogen and removing 1xbit entirely.

I think, they can't remove 1xbit entirely because this site has a lot of players outside the forum.
They at least give a low rating but I believe, they deserve to get C-.
Also, in terms of their disadvantages, if they can put several scam accusations unresolved, at least give warning to newbies that don't know its history.
Anyway, I have seen also bitsler and stake with C rating, which means, it has the same level of 1xbit?
I think a lot of players will not accept that. I believe, they should review the ratings of crypto sportsbooks here.

most of the books you placed on the list are pretty good so, thanks for the info.

Why do you chose to rate all these gambling platforms outside everyone consensus? Rating maybe pretty good but only those who had used these platforms can give a better review than just your perspectives alone. What you think about a platform might be different from my own experience with them. Maybe I might have encarta some difficulty using the platform reducing my interest and rating for it. Good review!

There could be several indicators as to why he ended up on these sites in particular. On other review sites maybe 10 others and the other 10 in the last 10 for example. I also always wonder what the criteria are based on, since every site has its good and bad points. After all, it's the player experiences that should be the most reliable.

^ That is why sometimes I did not rely on the rating of the review site because it is a personal opinion by the author, they had different criteria for judging the casino. Sometimes they will cover those negative reviews if the casino gives a higher amount of affiliates, just wanting to earn more money through affiliation. Not the same on the review of users who truly experience the casino and it should be a review that comes from the community because it has an individual opinion not just made by one author.

Much better if you will check the current reputation of the sites mentioned. Because somehow, it has personal bias. Just like the current ratings on the site. We don't know also if it is updated or not. I believe, with the ratings on this review site, a lot will not agree but at the end of the day, it is you who will experience the site. Review sites are just a guide but you still need to do the work of reading the terms of each site you want to play with.

On the list from this post is missing 1xbit which is ranked 10th on your website and is above Sportsbet.io

https://100bookies.com/1xbit-review/

I really like that your review is completely independent and is based only on truthful and confirmed information.
I wish you success of your service.

Agree that these ratings are very good. Betcoin, Nitrobetting and Playbtr are definitely top books. Nitrobetting is a better version of Nitrogensports because of the bonuses.

Hi Peeps Place, Thank you a lot:) You are also doing a good job with your #1 ratings of bitcoin sportsbooks!

Thank you very much too!

My guess is that in your opening post you removed 1xBit in fear of community criticism?
You can see for yourself (your trust) that Bitcointalk trust ratings don't always reflect the truth.
I'm glad you made an honest review on your website at least.
Keep up a good work!

The fact is that our rating is not static, the positions of all sites there are floating. It's just that after the last update, the positions of several sites in the rating have changed slightly. Of course, we also try to listen to player's opinion when ranking the best cryptocurrency betting/gambling sites. In any case, the latest version of the rating is not final and over time it will change many times over. Thanks for the kind words!

It's a good thing that you're basing each site's ranking and rating based on players' opinions and reviews. It will surely change from time to time and there are also possible sites to be added but this list will also be a big help, especially for beginners who are trying to look for legit and trusted sites.

And why not? Is there a rule that everyone must agree before someone can make a review of a gambling site? But, I think it's safe to ask permission first to the gambling site owner. That is also to give respect to them and yes, it is better if they make a review based on their actual experience of playing on that gambling site, not that they will write whatever think of but even if they did it, there will still be a disagreement that will happen because not all of us can get the same experience when playing on the same site.

In my case, I agree on what he puts on the top 10 list. I knew most of those casinos and I knew that they are good.

Such review sites are not always reliable. And by that I mean the rating of the sportsbook. Advertising is often purchased or paid to be allowed to advertise. Who pays the most, is then the highest on a review site, that's how simple it works nowadays. That does not necessarily apply to every site, but the revenue model is used on many sites.

This is true but there's also some reviewers that are not bias and they're not doing it for the sake of payment. They're just doing their own content based on what the community really needs. I see some good bookies out there and I don't think that they'll pay just to be in someone's review for this article.
@OP are you going to do other reviews and include new sports books on that list if possible?

If the sportsbooks is already doing good on their own terms, I don't think they will pay these review sites to give them positive or high rating. Because even without these review sites, they can already get customers just by offering good services and competitive features. Now, if the bookie wants more positive reviews out there, they can really tap these review sites. But mostly, those top bookies won't as they already earned their players.
By the way, how often is the OP's team updating their list?

There's still a possibility that they would do that just for the sake of marketing. And as you've said, they're already doing good so paying someone to make a good review for them will justify their payment.
Since they're already known to be a good one, no one would notice that they've done that as paid because the other reviews and their reputation is already good enough.

I think sports book rankings can change every year, depending on their situation how to promote the gambling site in question.

Basically, the list you show, maybe I don't argue with it, it makes sense, but I think you should update every year the list of top sports books.

As I see April 11, 2022, there's been a shift in the list of the top 2022 sportsbooks.
As I see below.
List of 25 Best Bitcoin Sports Betting Bookmakers 2022 (https://www.google.com/amp/s/globalextramoney.com/crypto-betting/bitcoin-sports-betting-bookmakers%3famp=1)

Maybe you should follow developments all the time about sports books and gambling sites that must be updated every year, advice no one pushes.

Seems right though, gambling platform mostly pays influencers or review site owners to review their site on a high level so viewers or gamblers can have good reasons to bet on those platform. Sometimes it is difficult to differentiate between a paid to review platform and non paid to review. Your review is cool although, I will like it if you can write more on other gambling platforms so the review can be large enough for interested gamblers to select from.

I read through somewhere that Sportsbet.lo have made a deal with English premier league. If that is correct than putting them in B class rating might not be a good option, do you take suggestions as well? I mean, do you consider also information such as advertising contracts?

Thanks sportbettor. It's nice for players to have a couple of guides.

I'm afraid that this will for another more Scam accusation if they will add 1xbit in the OP , remember that there are so many cases filed against this gambling site and being the worst or being most accused  Gambling site /sportsbetting in the forum now.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5267172.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5266815.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5392734.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5393527.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5391560.0

check all those threads and let the people here Judged what they think is happening .

I am not attacking the site but I am just trying to convince people here before depositing and play.

I would like to see some threads like this one but with updated info

This might not be talking about Sportsbook list but rather in overall gambling site views and rating which is somehow that considerable.

https://www.btcgosu.com
https://gamblingbro.com

If we do solely talks about bookies then there were no update list but somewhat this is already a good list to look
at yet most of them are reliable and trusted.

May I ask what is the criteria you used in ranking them from top 1 to 20? It is kind of important that you would indicate or let know of the readers how would you come up with the rankings since some review site based it in their payment and some because of the popularity of the site.

How 1xbit is rating of top 11 in your review site where you didn’t include a lot of promising gambling platform. So, i don’t consider as it’s a legit review site and i doubt about transparency of this site. Though OP is created in 2019, but you should edit and include of these are very popular casino sites right now such as duelbits,fortunejack and roobet.

I can see only few gambling websites on the list and I think more should be added. Concerning the rating, I don't think this really count cause op had not added some of the best gambling platforms that we have here on this forum. I think the criteria that is used to rate these websites should be disclosed so we can know how paramount this rating could be.

Indeed. After those two years, we already have many sports betting sites that are now increasingly popular. @OP needs to update his articles so that his visitors know that he cares about the position of sports betting sites which are bound to change from year to year. Or he just wants to write down the position of each sports betting site based on his own wishes and not because of the reputation of each site. But hopefully, he wants to give us his latest update. Meanwhile, we already have several review sites about gambling that we can use as a reference for gambling.

Seeing the OP’s list we can easily conclude that, OP has written this randomly.
There is no sense in the list.
He just picked up casinos and gambling sites randomly without doing any prior knowledge.
It’s advised to all the newbies that avoid this list while choosing the gambling site or casino where you will put money.
Check good reviews of other reviewers(not promoting specifically anyone) and put your money wisely.

Looking at it? yeah indeed it is randomly listed or at least they are being Paid of this scam site lol.
Well maybe it is? or not?
lol there are legit casinos in the list it is just that 1xbit is being questioned and also being a proven scam from this site .

Some of the like sports book with crypto currency are Stake,Sportsbet,Fortune Jack.Their are huge with the sportsbet,but only few was used by many people for their wish,their comfortable towards the website.This mentioned website was my favourite and I had huge experience in this websites.This website are trusted from my knowledge.So you guys have a try on this websites.

Most review sites include 1xbit in their list because outside this forum, they have large user-base.
And these sites wanted to get a hold of the possible players that may use their referral links for their commission.
If you are a forum user, by now, you should already know how to distinguish a reputable casino/bookie.
Review sites are just a guide and whoever is the owner, has the prerogative what to put on their site.
It is up to you, as a player, to do your homework so as not to screw by these shady casinos.

Unfortunately, there is no exact formula for calculating sportsbook ratings yet. But we have certain markers that can be used to at least approximately determine the value of a particular sportsbook, read more about it here: http://100bookies.com/how-we-rank-bookies/

Everyone has different opinion but I think Bitsler and FortubeJack are underrated here. I’m confident that FortuneJack has made wonderful sportsbook betting than any other casino. Not sure if anyone follows but they more or less focus on the sport betting rather than the casino side itself.

Bitsler would be on second position in my list for the looks, easiness and all the type of options available for betting.

Nonetheless freebitcoin being non casino site also managed to get easiest sports betting section ever.

The new cryptocurrency betting site (Mint.io) has recently been added to our rating: http://100bookies.com/mint-io-review/

i am wondering, who is giving the overall rating for each reviewed sportsbook site? also, with your list in top 20 crypto bookies, are you by any chance updating or checking again the site for possible improvement of services and possibly change their overall rating? and also, betfury has not made it in your list here.
this is your review site, so whatever parameters you will use, that's your privilege to do so. but i can understand why some players don't agree about 1xbit being in the C level along with other reputable sites known to this forum like roobet, rollbit or duelbits.

As a rule, we assign a rating of C-,C or C+ to all new betting sites, depending on the presence or absence of a license and its status. In the future, any estimates can be revised both upwards and downwards. In addition, at the moment we cannot put all the well-known cryptocurrency betting sites in our rating of the top 20 cryptocurrency sportsbooks, since quite a lot of them have already opened recently.

We have recently added a new sportsbook (AnonymBet) to our website: http://100bookies.com/anonymbet-review/

Also added Yas.bet: http://100bookies.com/yas-bet-review/

...and Wintomato: http://100bookies.com/wintomato-review/

I saw OP's classification and I see that it has a selection of good casinos and others that are not so good, for example in position number 1 I do not agree, as far as I know, the casino that has the best sports betting platform is Sportbet , and stake, I would like to know from what point of view your opinion is made for the sites? since it seems somewhat doubtful to me, it is not that those or the other casinos are not up to the task, but that there is a better action that some others have done that are well above the things that others do, I do not know if I explain myself , but I think the last of the selection should be first or second.

The fact is that recently many promising cryptocurrency casinos have appeared, which also opened sports betting sections on their websites. This has significantly increased competition in this market, as a result of which some well-known betting brands have lost their positions in our rating. In any case - this is only our subjective opinion, you can follow your own preferences when choosing betting sites, as we will not be able to please all players when compiling our list anyway.

But isn't that great? Not unlike to other rating sites out there that only post all good casinos and then make a tiny difference between them like they rate the first one a 5 star and the next one is 4.9, then 4.8 and so on. It's important to know if what are those bad casinos so that we can avoid them and we won't think they are just new and we will be curious to try them. All of us has our own choice, as well as the rating sites.

You may not agree on some of their ratings but what can you do? It was theirs and maybe they genuinely think that the casino that they rate first deserves it and not just they are only being paid to come up a list like that.

I'm glad to see you gave Stake a good review and recognize them as a leader in the space.  It's great being partnered with an operation that is well respected and acknowledged as doing a great job in the space.  It makes advertising for them easy and care free.  :)

There were a few others I hadn't heard of and will familiarize myself a little with them by reading your reviews.  Nice job!

Thank you very much!

This is why i dont really believe much on rating sites or review ones which you would really be making this as a basis whether you would play or not on a certain gambling or betting site because reviews

could neither be biased or not really that much accurate or precise but well same as you said that this do base up with actual experience of a certain reviewer which does simply means that it would really

be different into each other when it comes to other reviewers as well.Whether they would be having opposite sentiment or would really be just almost the same.
Thing here on choosing which casino you would really be playing on would be ending up on your own choice in the end of the day.

Another new crypto sportsbook (BiBET) has been added to our site: http://100bookies.com/bibet-review/

...and BC.game as well: http://100bookies.com/bc-game-review/

Woah!  What kind of list is this?

Nitrobetting wasn't even around in 2019!  Second,  nitrobetting is NOT A rated!!!  Are you paid to rate these high?  REMOVE THIS FAKE RATING!  The site is a BETA with half of the site NOT working properly!  They never fix their issues!  I have found more than half a dozen bugs and should be paid to have found but they STILL were not addressed nor fixed!  

"Longstanding trusted operator"  Was Nitrogensports trustworthy?   That's arguable...  Not at the end with this "transition" to nitrobetting! They forced people to move to nitrobetting!   You couldn't stay at Nitrogensports!  They really lost most of their customers with this transition!

"Excellent section of Live betting"  NO!  Live is VERY inconsistent!  Whenever they want to offer live!   Not reliable AT ALL!!!  When it is available,  it takes 30 seconds to confirm so you can never get a bet confirmed! Pathetic live experience!

"Emphasis on anonymous playing"  WRONG!  They will NOT allow withdrawal without verifying private information!  This is BLATANT FALSE ADVERTISING when they advertise 100% anonymous betting!

"High betting limits on most markets"  WRONG!  Limits are low ($100 MAX BET) and will limit for NO REASON!

"Lightning fast transactions"  HAHAHAHA...  NO WAY!   Nitrobetting delays withdrawals for SO MANY reasons!  They cancel withdrawals!!!!  They don't notify when there is a reason why they're holding on to customers payment! Always takes arguing with them to get them to send.  They MAY give a one time exception but after that, THEY STEAL FUNDS/AFFILIATE PAYMENTS! THEY DON'T PAY WHEN YOU REQUEST!  THEY IGNORE YOU IF YOU KEEP ASKING THEM TO SEND PAYMENT!  100% FRAUDULENT!

"Superior customer support"  HAHAHAHA....  NO!  Their support lies, blames everything on their customers!  They close tickets even though issues not resolved!   They never resolve issues!  The managers lie CONSTANTLY!  AGAIN, IT'S ALWAYS THE CUSTOMER'S FAULT!  

YOU SHOULD REMOVE THIS "A" RECOMMENDATION IMMEDIATELY AS NITROBETTING ARE FRAUD AND LIARS!  STAY AWAY FROM NITROBETTING,  YOU'VE BEEN WARNED!

In any case, thank you for your feedback, we will try to take into account some of your comments.

CoinRoyale bitcoin sportsbook has been added: http://100bookies.com/coinroyale-review/

...and Duelbits as well: http://100bookies.com/duelbits-review/

Well what happens is that the reviewers of sites sometimes get carried away by some things or impressions of others, what happens is that many of the reviewers are not willing to pay a certain amount of money to try the games, it is difficult because who pays that to them, although it seems to me that there are some reviewers who have a lot of BTC and crypto to be able to do this and since they like it they have no problem, which is an essential contribution for everyone, and this prevents them from many people go through the painful step of being scammed, unfortunately in the world there are still people who like to steal.

Crypto sportsbook Crashino added to our website: http://100bookies.com/crashino-review/

Added sportsbook Chipstars as well: http://100bookies.com/chipstars-review/

It looks like a boom in the opening of new crypto gambling & betting sites has begun:). BetCoCo also added to the database of our website: http://100bookies.com/betcoco-review/

Also added GTXbet defi crypto sportsbook: http://100bookies.com/gxgbet-review/

Bit555 crypto sportsbook added: http://100bookies.com/bit555-review/

Winz.io sportsbook added: http://100bookies.com/winz-io-review/

Also BetFlip added: http://100bookies.com/betflip-review/

Added Fairspin sportsbook: http://100bookies.com/fairspin-review/

EuphoriaBet Esports-book added: http://100bookies.com/euphoriabet-review/

Punt crypto sportsbook added: http://100bookies.com/punt-review/

May I ask what criteria you used for ranking them from 1 to 20? It is very important that you let your readers know how you created this rating, because some of the review sites have based it on their payment, and some because of the popularity of the site.

In my opinion, the author did not have these criteria, looking at the ranking, I think it was ranked by their own view ,To be fair, it is not easy to make a good rating and not everyone can be pleased with the list,I would definitely put half of the others in my ranking, I would put Sportsbet higher

In general, I agree with you, I am playing recently, I tried to play a couple of casinos such as Playbetr, Fairspin and Roobet and I liked playing everywhere, Fairspin crypto casino also has staking, their stacking statistics pleased with APR 535%, so I think there is no bad casino, every casino is a question of taste

When it comes to review sites or guide sites then ratings would really be basing up on personal preference or interest and this is where they do really differ.If you are a gambler who do have already experience on a certain site and turns out the rating is not really something that you could approve on then thats a solid thing that tells that we do have our own preference and criteria on things that
we are involved with.

There are couple of trusted review or guide site that we do have today or had been trusted by this forum due to their unbiased reviews and clear rankings basing on their
real time experience on the site.As a reader then you could really able to determine whether those are accurate reviews or totally not that true.

Unfortunately, there is no exact formula for evaluating betting sites. And it is actually not easy as a result to please all players when compiling a rating, since each player has an own list of his favorite sportsbooks and his own opinion on building such ratings. As for us directly, in this case we rely primarily on our experience in this field and a number of additional factors, the detailed list of which you can find at this link: https://100bookies.com/how-we-rank-bookies/

Betfamous social betting site added: http://100bookies.com/betfamous-review/

Also added Betadda Sportsbook & Betting Exchange: http://100bookies.com/betadda-review/

Added Bitcasino.io Esports-book: http://100bookies.com/bitcasino-io-review/

Added Chips.gg sportsbook as well: http://100bookies.com/chips-gg-review/

Added FreeBitcoin mutual betting: http://100bookies.com/freebitcoin-review/

These types of ratings can never be perfect due to different user experiences.
All these types of ratings can be based on different parameters which cannot apply to all users. Also, these ratings are variable from time to time due to changes in user experience and trends toward them.

DuckDice sportsbook has been added to our site: http://100bookies.com/duckdice-review/

Added JackBit crypto sportsbook: http://100bookies.com/jackbit-review/

BlueChip betting site added: http://100bookies.com/bluechip-review/

Bet999 crypto sportsbook added: http://100bookies.com/bet999-review/

A plain and simple website with pretty informative content.

The only thing I would point out was that you do not mention which sites support or do not support Sports Bet trading. There little to few sports book operators offering this sort of feature so I guess this would be very useful information to have on your website.

Coinplay sportsbook added to database of our site: http://100bookies.com/coinplay-review/

Also Rocketpot has been added: http://100bookies.com/rocketpot-review/

Added DraftApes crypto DFS platform: http://100bookies.com/draftapes-review/

Ole777 crypto sportsbook added: http://100bookies.com/ole777-review/

Added Coins.game crypto sportsbook & casino: http://100bookies.com/coins-game-review/

Vave crypto sportsbook & casino added: http://100bookies.com/vave-review/

Has anyone here tried any casino referral programs?

Hey there, I had some experience inviting friends via referral programs, but they didn’t really gamble all that much so I didn’t get a lot in return.

What sort of perks do you get anyway? And for what casinos did you have experience with?

I’ve tried lots of them. I know for a fact fairspin currently has such an option – you get a cut of the profit they make, 1% of the funds your referral loses.

I see.

Your friend will also get 200 tokens after signing up using your link, so it’s a win-win. 

Yeah, that’s true. Thanks again!

Added BitBet24 sportsbook & casino: http://100bookies.com/bitbet24-review/

MintDice crypto sportsbook added: http://100bookies.com/mintdice-review/

Added Bookmaker.XYZ decentralized sportsbook: http://100bookies.com/bookmaker-xyz-review/

PlanetaXbet crypto bookie added: http://100bookies.com/planetaxbet-review/

Added AlienBet crypto bookmaker: http://100bookies.com/alienbet-review/

Sometimes the classification of some casinos depends on the criteria of the reviewer, which, sometimes it is very interesting that they could hear it in context, because I think that anyone comes and says that X casino is the best for X thing, and does not give any other reason. It is very difficult to trust criteria like that, because it is analogous to the groups of signals in trading, you only have to trust what they say behind closed eyes only because "he or she" is the one who is right, and it cannot be questioned, I understand that there are many people in the forum with a lot of experience, but since it is a photo we need more detailed information, because that is the reason for a forum, to have more specific information.
 
The best thing here and I will always say it is personal research, it takes more time but I consider that it is the safest way and thus forge a criterion with bases and arguments that not everyone can say otherwise or question.

Is this book 100% legit?

I agree.
One of the problems is that usually people who made reviews for casinos ignore some aspects of a good redaction. They know they are writing for gamblers, but there are gamblers of all sorts, who look for different experiences and live different economical situations.

For example, I like dices. If I read a review about a webpage which is very good because their sport betting section and their blackjack, I would not give it a try and perhaps they have very good dices.

In the end, it is normal those things happen, because a small team of reviewers (sometimes a team of one single person) does not have resources to give us more detailed information. Perhaps, that is because some may prefer to seek for collective reviews on webpages like trust-pillow (which are possible to artificially influence, btw.)

They are licensed in Curacao, so it's legal. However, they have only recently opened and do not yet have reviews on the Internet, so for now, in any case, you should use their service with caution.

In case anyone is interested, Fairspin started a tournament on  Feb 1st, there are a lot of activities where you can win promo codes and small prizes.

Crypto sportsbook Sherbet has been added to our database: http://100bookies.com/sherbet-review/

BlackJack.fun crypto gambling & betting site has been added as well: http://100bookies.com/blackjack-fun-review/

Betzus sportsbook has been added to our website: http://100bookies.com/betzus-review/

Onikabet sportsbook has been added: http://100bookies.com/onikabet-review/

Hello! How trustworthy is this rating, which is based on 100bookies.com? Is 100bookies.com financially interested in people betting at these listed companies?

Can I be 100% sure that none of these cryptobookmakers will steal my money?

Even though research or research itself takes longer, one can get substantial benefits such as experience and knowledge to be able to get good research or predictions.
It's impossible for a gambler to rely solely on research or predictions made by other people forever because it's not necessarily the truth. It's better to use your own research or predictions, whatever the results will be, if we do it ourselves, it can give satisfaction and a sense of pride when we win a bet. .
Knowledge and insight are very valuable things so that no matter how much time it takes, if you can provide knowledge, it is not a barrier because experience knowledge will be brought at any time.

Well said buddy, the internet made it easier for everyone to get information on their own, but unfortunately, many are still so lazy that they still depend on other internet user for information which is available to everyone.

High time we learn to take responsibility for our own actions, I consider it foolish to make important decisions based on other people's research, persons we don't even know, yeah, we can always use other people's research as a case to study when doing our own, but never prioritize another person's research over yours, most especially, in simple matter like this.

Op there are some cryptocurrency Sportbooks that are good and need to be added in the op list, and that is to say, the list has to be updated to add these casinos, and which means the top 20s will be rename to the top 30. Because any casino that has won the heart of the gamblers without any issue have be listed as one.

And also there are some casinos that are good in the site but the way the managers treating the participants here also affecting the casino over there. That is why good managers are needed to handle the trustworthy casinos campaigns.

these questions are the kind of question that deep down when we close our eyes we can get the answer ourselves without needing google or other people to tell us and the reason for getting the answer is quite simple: the owner of those sites that list many casinos are anonymous people who have no power to decide who should be paid or not by casino x or z. Casinos also have anonymous owners who can decide to pay or not and can run away tomorrow or another day because they know they are anonymous and that the police will not chase and arrest them.

that is, in a world where everyone is anonymous there is a lot of room for scams and many scammers, yours and mine and everyone's instinct we know that in this market there is no such thing as 100% safe and guarantee, but since we want to play then let's use that casino that has been on the market for a long time and has signs of being safe and reliable and obviously not 100% safe and reliable, the person should always think about it, that he should not put all his money in the casino thinking that it will be 100%, always look carefully distrust even if it is an old and reliable casino and avoid using new casinos, they are very dangerous

See our updated Ranking here:

BetCoin - https://100bookies.com/betcoin-review/
NitroBetting - https://100bookies.com/nitrobetting-review/
Cloudbet - https://100bookies.com/cloudbet-review/
Stake - https://100bookies.com/stake-review/
Bitsler - https://100bookies.com/bitsler-review/
FortuneJack - https://100bookies.com/fortunejack-review/
BC.game- http://100bookies.com/bc-game-review/
Roobet - https://100bookies.com/roobet-review/
Duelbits - https://100bookies.com/duelbits-review/
Wolf.bet - https://100bookies.com/wolf-bet-review/
BetFury - https://100bookies.com/betfury-review/
Vave - https://100bookies.com/vave-review/
Shuffle - http://100bookies.com/shuffle-review/
DuckDice - https://100bookies.com/duckdice-review/
Gamdom - https://100bookies.com/gamdom-review/
Rollbit - https://100bookies.com/rollbit-review/
Coins.game - https://100bookies.com/coins-game-review/
Chips.gg - https://100bookies.com/chips-gg-review/
Coinplay - https://100bookies.com/coinplay-review/
Rocketpot - https://100bookies.com/rocketpot-review/

I see that you have edited the OP as well and I thought that sportsbet.io is going to be part of it because they've got a huge community.

And a lot of sponsorships being done to have more users into them. Just curious why it's not part of your top 20.

Here preference is given first of all to full-fledged cryptocurrency sportsbooks (without accepting Fiat).

Okay.

I think that you can add this note to the first page so that if anyone is curious why's that, they'd understand that it's all about those sportsbooks that are 100% crypto.

But I think that some if not most of them that's on the list accepts also fiat.

I accidentally stumbled upon this branch, followed the link of the site and I had flashbacks in 2005... Sites used to do this))
Everything is so crookedly done, but I'm sure that all my heart and free time were invested, so I won't criticize, work, develop and good luck.

Sorry if anyone doesn't like the design or functionality of our site - it's all really a bit outdated and has really needed some revision and updating for a long time. But despite this, our rating remains quite adequate and quite relevant in our opinion, so thank you very much for your wishes for success in future work.

You can also find a separate List of Sportsbooks that accept USA players here:

https://100bookies.com/sportsbooks-that-accept-usa-players-eng/

Many of them also accept fiat.

The top 10 positions in our cryptocurrency ranking now look like this:

1. BetCoin - https://100bookies.com/betcoin-review/
2. NitroBetting - https://100bookies.com/nitrobetting-review/
3. Cloudbet - https://100bookies.com/cloudbet-review/
4. Stake - https://100bookies.com/stake-review/
5. Bitsler - https://100bookies.com/bitsler-review/
6. FortuneJack - https://100bookies.com/fortunejack-review/
7. BC.game- https://100bookies.com/bc-game-review/
8. Roobet - https://100bookies.com/roobet-review/
9. Duelbits - https://100bookies.com/duelbits-review/
10. Wolf.bet - https://100bookies.com/wolf-bet-review/

Decentralized sports betting exchange Bitcoin Betting (https://100bookies.com/bitcoin-betting-review/) has also been added to our site's database in the list of betting exchanges:

https://100bookies.com/betting-exchanges-list-eng/

I just stumbled upon your page, I've never seen it before, well, you did well, even though they are regular reviews without some specific figures, appraisals and faults despite the advantages and disadvantages added to it. The truth is that I don't fall for the personal review, this one may be a bit of an exception though because you did not crucify one casino for the other the way most private reviewers do.

However, what you wrote about Stake is somewhat true but you will do well to update the payment options as the biggest crypto casino. I don't know about you, but my Stake.com platform has 21 crypto payment options.

Could you please update the invite code for the Bitcoin Betting? It is not active.

Thanks, the invite code for the Bitcoin Betting has been changed. You can find it here: http://100bookies.com/bitcoin-betting-review/

See also the list of the best DFS sites here: https://100bookies.com/daily-fantasy-sports-sites-eng/

Thanks for this info - the number of the payment options is of course important, but the main complaint about Stake (https://100bookies.com/stake-review/) is that, according to information from this forum, they have recently often started to require KYC from their clients.

Could you please REMOVE Nitrobetting.eu from this list?

It has been known to numerous betting forums and communities that they simply DO NOT pay anyone and people have to wait even 40days for small 1-2k USD withdraws.

You can't be keeping such a scam bookie with 30 recent negative reviews on trustpilot and here about not paying payouts , ont the list with the "top 20 cryptocurrency sportsbook".

Thanks for the info! We've downgraded Nitrobetting (https://100bookies.com/nitrobetting-review/) to "C" first, and then we'll see.

This list...

https://talkimg.com/images/2025/04/07/xXwAz.gif

I'll exclude my ratings. Of the rest of the guides this one is the best. It's the most comprehensive and the ratings are very good. They don't seem to be influenced by money.

I don't agree with your overall ranking op. How the heck is Betcoin #1? Why are premier crypto sportsbooks like Sportbet.io, Polymarket etc not even part of your list? Also, Cloudbet number 3? Really?

They have a bad reputation in this forum and elsewhere in recent times. Biggies like Pinnacle also need to be a part of this list. So many inaccuracies basically.

He has Pinnacle #3 overall, crypto and fiat. Sportsbet and Stake have bad odds and confiscate money all the time. Sometimes winnings and sometimes winnings plus deposits. Go look at scam accusations here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0 and Trust Pilot https://trustpilot.com/review/sportsbet.io and https://trustpilot.com/review/stake.com. Cloudbet has better odds than those two and doesn't confiscate as much. Who would you put ahead of Betcoin? Too many times people do rankings as a popularity contest instead of the best sportsbook.

When it comes to review sites or ranking ones then it could be that influenced with these factors and thats why having that inaccuracies.

1. Paid ranking
2. Personal ranking
3. Lacks other sites or totally incomplete

This is why i dont like to read up with these kind of ranking site or site, not unless if I do saw that the community is trusting it.
I would rather be that check btcgosu into this aspect than with other rating sites out there.

Personally i would be that liking to bet on Sportsbet.io.

You don't have to agree with the OP's choice of top 20 cryptocurrency sportsbook, I also do not agree with his choices too but that's just it, there is nothing we can do aside state our disagreement with him, even though his choice is his choice still, it is often said that a man's food could be another man's poison and this is a fact.

Your experiences and OP's experiences with cryptocurrency sportsbooks may likely not be the same, and op has made his list of top 20 cryptocurrency sportsbooks based on his own personal experiences with the casinos he has interacted with.
So right now, it's completely in your hands to come up with your own top 20 cryptocurrency sportsbooks based on your own experiences as well, atleast, we are in a free space where we all are entitled to our various individual opinions.

Hi guys! Thanks for all the comments and support. Totally agree with your opinions. It is really difficult to make a sportsbook rating that will suit and please all players.

With this, we can say this ranking is based on individual perception and not the community's contributions since many players over here don't agree with this ranking of yours what have you to say that could convince more members of this forum including myself?

The rating is not based only on personal experience, we also try to take into account the opinions and reviews of players, including the participants of this forum.

It is his prerogative to make such list, so he has his own set of criteria how to rank the casinos. Everyone has their criteria as to how you list these casinos. Just look at the rating sites, each one has their own top casinos and they have their pros and cons.
We can say that they can rate all they want, but people know here which casinos are really reputable and are included in the top. It is your due diligence to find out how credible the gambling site is.