sportbettor (OP)
Member
 Offline
Activity: 773
Merit: 17
|
 |
April 24, 2021, 08:41:52 AM
Last edit: April 24, 2021, 10:21:39 AM by sportbettor |
|
I checked your updated ratings and I disagree with a couple of them. Why is Nitrobetting in the 2nd spot? They have clearly dropped in popularity rankings in recent times due to the accusations against them. They should be ranked lower in the list in my opinion. Also, why is 1xbit part of the top 10? This is a scam site which shouldn't be added in any ranking list. It is actually quite difficult to please everyone on this site, as each player has their own sportsbook rating. As for Nitrogen, it should be noted that it has been the best for a long time, so it still has every right to occupy high places in the ratings of cryptocurrency sportsbooks. And 1xbit has a rather low rating on our site (C), which by itself signals a low level of trust in this brand. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Every time a block is mined, a certain amount of BTC (called the
subsidy) is created out of thin air and given to the miner. The
subsidy halves every four years and will reach 0 in about 130 years.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
mediaBuzz
|
|
April 24, 2021, 08:56:24 AM |
|
Agree that Nitrogen is #1 and Betcoin #2. I'm not a big fan of 1xbit or Cloudbet but as you pointed out, all ratings guides will be somewhat different.
I guess you are not a big fan of 1xbit because of the accusation they got. Which can be and is spread by their competitors. Anyone can spread any type of information including negative ones on the internet, not saying about big businesses do this every day. I personally bet on both 1xBit and 1xBet for years, they provide everything that one legit online betting platform can possibly offer. The last parameter is quite accurate and allows you to indirectly assess the popularity of bookmakers in the opinion of the players themselves.
I appreciate this one since most of the time such platforms treat individual players in the way they actually do. Betting "experts", "influencers" might say any shit for the money. |
|
|
|
|
Haunebu
|
|
April 24, 2021, 03:06:31 PM |
|
It is actually quite difficult to please everyone on this site, as each player has their own sportsbook rating. As for Nitrogen, it should be noted that it has been the best for a long time, so it still has every right to occupy high places in the ratings of cryptocurrency sportsbooks. And 1xbit has a rather low rating on our site (C), which by itself signals a low level of trust in this brand.
I understand what you are trying to convey, but you are ignoring some key points here. Nitrogen hasn't been the best for a long time now. Sportsbet, Stake etc are way better in comparison. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=88706https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2835882Above links indicate the issues related to both sportsbooks which is why I suggested lowering the rank of Nitrogen and removing 1xbit entirely. |
|
|
|
|
TimeTeller
|
|
April 25, 2021, 10:43:24 PM |
|
It is actually quite difficult to please everyone on this site, as each player has their own sportsbook rating. As for Nitrogen, it should be noted that it has been the best for a long time, so it still has every right to occupy high places in the ratings of cryptocurrency sportsbooks. And 1xbit has a rather low rating on our site (C), which by itself signals a low level of trust in this brand.
I understand what you are trying to convey, but you are ignoring some key points here. Nitrogen hasn't been the best for a long time now. Sportsbet, Stake etc are way better in comparison. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=88706https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2835882Above links indicate the issues related to both sportsbooks which is why I suggested lowering the rank of Nitrogen and removing 1xbit entirely. I think, they can't remove 1xbit entirely because this site has a lot of players outside the forum. They at least give a low rating but I believe, they deserve to get C-. Also, in terms of their disadvantages, if they can put several scam accusations unresolved, at least give warning to newbies that don't know its history. Anyway, I have seen also bitsler and stake with C rating, which means, it has the same level of 1xbit? I think a lot of players will not accept that. I believe, they should review the ratings of crypto sportsbooks here. |
|
|
|
|
RyanSmith23421
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
|
April 08, 2022, 09:03:03 PM |
|
most of the books you placed on the list are pretty good so, thanks for the info.
|
|
|
|
|
Desmong
Member
Offline
Activity: 812
Merit: 13
Crypto bookmaker and casino
|
|
April 08, 2022, 10:33:34 PM |
|
Why do you chose to rate all these gambling platforms outside everyone consensus? Rating maybe pretty good but only those who had used these platforms can give a better review than just your perspectives alone. What you think about a platform might be different from my own experience with them. Maybe I might have encarta some difficulty using the platform reducing my interest and rating for it. Good review! |
|
|
|
BitcoinAccepted
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 1009
|
|
April 08, 2022, 10:39:45 PM |
|
There could be several indicators as to why he ended up on these sites in particular. On other review sites maybe 10 others and the other 10 in the last 10 for example. I also always wonder what the criteria are based on, since every site has its good and bad points. After all, it's the player experiences that should be the most reliable.
|
|
|
|
|
DoublerHunter
|
|
April 08, 2022, 10:45:36 PM |
|
There could be several indicators as to why he ended up on these sites in particular. On other review sites maybe 10 others and the other 10 in the last 10 for example. I also always wonder what the criteria are based on, since every site has its good and bad points. After all, it's the player experiences that should be the most reliable.
^ That is why sometimes I did not rely on the rating of the review site because it is a personal opinion by the author, they had different criteria for judging the casino. Sometimes they will cover those negative reviews if the casino gives a higher amount of affiliates, just wanting to earn more money through affiliation. Not the same on the review of users who truly experience the casino and it should be a review that comes from the community because it has an individual opinion not just made by one author. |
|
|
|
|
|
CaVO32
|
|
April 08, 2022, 11:04:43 PM |
|
There could be several indicators as to why he ended up on these sites in particular. On other review sites maybe 10 others and the other 10 in the last 10 for example. I also always wonder what the criteria are based on, since every site has its good and bad points. After all, it's the player experiences that should be the most reliable.
^ That is why sometimes I did not rely on the rating of the review site because it is a personal opinion by the author, they had different criteria for judging the casino. Sometimes they will cover those negative reviews if the casino gives a higher amount of affiliates, just wanting to earn more money through affiliation. Not the same on the review of users who truly experience the casino and it should be a review that comes from the community because it has an individual opinion not just made by one author. Much better if you will check the current reputation of the sites mentioned. Because somehow, it has personal bias. Just like the current ratings on the site. We don't know also if it is updated or not. I believe, with the ratings on this review site, a lot will not agree but at the end of the day, it is you who will experience the site. Review sites are just a guide but you still need to do the work of reading the terms of each site you want to play with. |
|
|
|
|
|
Cryptock
|
|
April 08, 2022, 11:25:13 PM |
|
On the list from this post is missing 1xbit which is ranked 10th on your website and is above Sportsbet.io https://100bookies.com/1xbit-review/I really like that your review is completely independent and is based only on truthful and confirmed information. I wish you success of your service. |
|
|
|
Rating Place
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3680
Merit: 1058
|
|
April 09, 2022, 03:41:18 AM |
|
On the list from this post is missing 1xbit which is ranked 10th on your website and is above Sportsbet.io https://100bookies.com/1xbit-review/I really like that your review is completely independent and is based only on truthful and confirmed information. I wish you success of your service. Agree that these ratings are very good. Betcoin, Nitrobetting and Playbtr are definitely top books. Nitrobetting is a better version of Nitrogensports because of the bonuses. |
|
|
|
sportbettor (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 773
Merit: 17
|
|
April 09, 2022, 01:29:31 PM |
|
On the list from this post is missing 1xbit which is ranked 10th on your website and is above Sportsbet.io https://100bookies.com/1xbit-review/I really like that your review is completely independent and is based only on truthful and confirmed information. I wish you success of your service. Agree that these ratings are very good. Betcoin, Nitrobetting and Playbtr are definitely top books. Nitrobetting is a better version of Nitrogensports because of the bonuses. Hi Peeps Place, Thank you a lot:) You are also doing a good job with your #1 ratings of bitcoin sportsbooks! |
|
|
|
sportbettor (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 773
Merit: 17
|
|
April 09, 2022, 04:17:40 PM |
|
On the list from this post is missing 1xbit which is ranked 10th on your website and is above Sportsbet.io https://100bookies.com/1xbit-review/I really like that your review is completely independent and is based only on truthful and confirmed information. I wish you success of your service. Thank you very much too! |
|
|
|
|
YinShuiSiYuan
|
|
April 09, 2022, 05:08:22 PM |
|
My guess is that in your opening post you removed 1xBit in fear of community criticism?
You can see for yourself (your trust) that Bitcointalk trust ratings don't always reflect the truth.
I'm glad you made an honest review on your website at least.
Keep up a good work!
|
|
|
|
sportbettor (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 773
Merit: 17
|
|
April 10, 2022, 11:00:04 AM |
|
My guess is that in your opening post you removed 1xBit in fear of community criticism?
You can see for yourself (your trust) that Bitcointalk trust ratings don't always reflect the truth.
I'm glad you made an honest review on your website at least.
Keep up a good work!
The fact is that our rating is not static, the positions of all sites there are floating. It's just that after the last update, the positions of several sites in the rating have changed slightly. Of course, we also try to listen to player's opinion when ranking the best cryptocurrency betting/gambling sites. In any case, the latest version of the rating is not final and over time it will change many times over. Thanks for the kind words! |
|
|
|
|
Cling18
|
|
April 10, 2022, 01:38:48 PM |
|
My guess is that in your opening post you removed 1xBit in fear of community criticism?
You can see for yourself (your trust) that Bitcointalk trust ratings don't always reflect the truth.
I'm glad you made an honest review on your website at least.
Keep up the good work!
The fact is that our rating is not static, the positions of all sites there are floating. It's just that after the last update, the positions of several sites in the rating have changed slightly. Of course, we also try to listen to players' opinions when ranking the best cryptocurrency betting/gambling sites. In any case, the latest version of the rating is not final and over time it will change many times over. Thanks for the kind words! It's a good thing that you're basing each site's ranking and rating based on players' opinions and reviews. It will surely change from time to time and there are also possible sites to be added but this list will also be a big help, especially for beginners who are trying to look for legit and trusted sites. |
|
|
|
|
|
barbara44
|
|
April 10, 2022, 03:33:15 PM |
|
Why do you chose to rate all these gambling platforms outside everyone consensus? Rating maybe pretty good but only those who had used these platforms can give a better review than just your perspectives alone. What you think about a platform might be different from my own experience with them. Maybe I might have encarta some difficulty using the platform reducing my interest and rating for it. Good review!
And why not? Is there a rule that everyone must agree before someone can make a review of a gambling site? But, I think it's safe to ask permission first to the gambling site owner. That is also to give respect to them and yes, it is better if they make a review based on their actual experience of playing on that gambling site, not that they will write whatever think of but even if they did it, there will still be a disagreement that will happen because not all of us can get the same experience when playing on the same site. In my case, I agree on what he puts on the top 10 list. I knew most of those casinos and I knew that they are good. |
|
|
|
|
MonsterV
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1008
|
|
April 10, 2022, 08:15:43 PM |
|
Such review sites are not always reliable. And by that I mean the rating of the sportsbook. Advertising is often purchased or paid to be allowed to advertise. Who pays the most, is then the highest on a review site, that's how simple it works nowadays. That does not necessarily apply to every site, but the revenue model is used on many sites.
|
|
|
|
|
passwordnow
|
|
April 10, 2022, 10:19:45 PM |
|
Such review sites are not always reliable. And by that I mean the rating of the sportsbook. Advertising is often purchased or paid to be allowed to advertise. Who pays the most, is then the highest on a review site, that's how simple it works nowadays. That does not necessarily apply to every site, but the revenue model is used on many sites.
This is true but there's also some reviewers that are not bias and they're not doing it for the sake of payment. They're just doing their own content based on what the community really needs. I see some good bookies out there and I don't think that they'll pay just to be in someone's review for this article. @OP are you going to do other reviews and include new sports books on that list if possible? |
| ..Stake.com.. | | | ▄████████████████████████████████████▄
██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ▄████▄
██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ██████
██ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ▀██▀
██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██
██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████▄ ██
██ █████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ███ ████████
██ ████ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████▀
██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██
██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██
▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███ ██ ██ ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
██████████████████████████████████████████ | | | | | | ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
█ ▄▀▄ █▀▀█▀▄▄
█ █▀█ █ ▐ ▐▌
█ ▄██▄ █ ▌ █
█ ▄██████▄ █ ▌ ▐▌
█ ██████████ █ ▐ █
█ ▐██████████▌ █ ▐ ▐▌
█ ▀▀██████▀▀ █ ▌ █
█ ▄▄▄██▄▄▄ █ ▌▐▌
█ █▐ █
█ █▐▐▌
█ █▐█
▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█ | | | | | | ▄▄█████████▄▄
▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄
▄█▀ ▐█▌ ▀█▄
██ ▐█▌ ██
████▄ ▄█████▄ ▄████
████████▄███████████▄████████
███▀ █████████████ ▀███
██ ███████████ ██
▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀
▀█▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄▄▄█▀
▀███████ ███████▀
▀█████▄ ▄█████▀
▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀ | | | ..PLAY NOW.. |
|
|
|
|
CaVO32
|
|
April 10, 2022, 10:23:47 PM |
|
Such review sites are not always reliable. And by that I mean the rating of the sportsbook. Advertising is often purchased or paid to be allowed to advertise. Who pays the most, is then the highest on a review site, that's how simple it works nowadays. That does not necessarily apply to every site, but the revenue model is used on many sites.
This is true but there's also some reviewers that are not bias and they're not doing it for the sake of payment. They're just doing their own content based on what the community really needs. I see some good bookies out there and I don't think that they'll pay just to be in someone's review for this article. @OP are you going to do other reviews and include new sports books on that list if possible? If the sportsbooks is already doing good on their own terms, I don't think they will pay these review sites to give them positive or high rating. Because even without these review sites, they can already get customers just by offering good services and competitive features. Now, if the bookie wants more positive reviews out there, they can really tap these review sites. But mostly, those top bookies won't as they already earned their players. By the way, how often is the OP's team updating their list? |
|
|
|
|
|
