Bitcoin Forum

I created this post to hear from you bounty hunters ,the way some developers treat bounty hunters this days is very bad , they know that many bounty hunters  needed money so badly so they take us so cheap ,I wish bounty hunters can somehow co-op to promote projects that bind by our own rules.

I wish there is something like' we must pay bounty hunters,their payment first before anything else',the same way they take exchanges payment serious .

Is there any solution for this?
How can we make them see that without bounty Hunters their projects awareness will be so low to none?

no there is unfortunately no solution here. the problem is that there are so many people who participate no matter how low the payout is. and then there are those who it is completely no matter how high the amounts are because they participate with several users to earn more. unfortunately, the bounty topic in the forum is completely degenerated. but belongs here simply to :D

this is just my thinking don't be offended I am also a bounty hunter, seeing the traffic generated by the promotions made by the bounty hunter in my opinion is less efficient and that makes the project treat the bountyhunter badly, and always gives a reward at the end (after the investor trades) an bounty is always made by projects that don't want to waste their funds. for promotion or in short a quick way of promotion without having to use services that are quite expensive, and that's why bounty hunters always get less good pay.

Majority of them never do any research and they are creating so many complaints when they are getting bad projects. they must realized if that's their own risk. So many untrusted developers can become another concern too. there is no solution for that but the only way make these hunters do research before trying to promote anything.

OP, it is time to move forward and focus on how you can make profit from crypto apart from participating in bounty campaign, developers are gradually losing faith in bounty hunters and very soon it may get worse instead of complaining about that,i feel it is time to move on.

I don't think there is any solution to that but the fact remains we have to overlook and keep doing our things but I will suggest that Scam thread be always created for such project and let others be aware of it

I also miss the good old bounty hunting days where bounty hunters receive very considerable rewards during distributions. Big enough that you can go trading with it. But right now there are so many bounty hunters that compete with its other even though the stakes are very low.

The best solution I can think of right now is to stop promoting ICO bounty projects, you can pick bounties that have no ICO and are already trading ,this way you will know what you will get

I think the problem with bounties this days is we have too many bounty hunters to share a certain bounty pool allocation ,just imagine thousands of hunters waiting to share 20,000$$ worth of rewards

The problem is not with the number of bounty hunters, at least there are bounty campaigns that still have limited number of participants. The main problem is the ill treatment given to bounty hunters by the project team.
- Bounty allocation is reduced.
- Bounty payment us delayed.
- Refusal to pay bounty hunters
And many more.

No solution at all!

This is the risk that we have whenever we join any bounties. When we have joined, we are abide by their rules meaning and one of the rules are they can change the terms at any time. So meaning to say, whatever they do we have to follow it. It is really up to them if they will be fair especially some bounty hunters are cheaters in which unfair to us.

I also want to be like that, but you know that we are not the person can create the rules. However, we have the right to participate or refuse with any bounty that we don't like.

We (bounty hunters) are underestimated by many in our work in promoting the project. In my opinion, after 2017 it happened until now. Actually, in my opinion, they know our role clearly. Maybe they have started to find new strategies to make a famous project. From me there is no solution.

It will be difficult for the majority of bounty hunters to be on the same page otherwise some of these low paying projects might be thought a good lesson. These projects have no regards for hunters, already trading projects if seen should be promoted more than some of the ones offering low payout. Reclaiming respect will be almost impossible.

Well bounty hunters if do their work as directed are generally respected and paid as promised but yes sometimes we do not get anything due to ico raising low funds or team not paying to hunters but we have to keep this in mind that bad guys are everywhere even in real life we see such people everyday who do not care for others so this is life and we have to learn to move on if something happens against our expectations.

But you aren't moving on from bounty hunting ,your profile account is wearing iskra coin signature ,the advice you should be spreading is bounty hunters must not give up and keep learning everyday ,the more they learn the better outcome they will get

The solution to this is very simple but not easy for people to implement because some people do as if their life only depend on this bounty. To me bounty hunters need to stop acting as if the life depend on the tips they would get from bounty hunting, just check most telegram bounty group, you would be annoyed and when this become a norm, the developers would also start treating them the same way. As for scam bounty, what need to be done is look before you jump

The only thing you can do is stop promoting campaign which don't want to give BTC/ETH as reward, at least some portion of the reward should be BTC/ETH and this budget must be escrowed through a trusted forum escrow providor.

The team members should respect bounty hunters, because they are representing a real power. I have already seen some projects that refused to pay bounty hunters and within several months this company was completely eliminated from crypto market.

i think what you are saying is impossible because as bounty hunters we are moving alone. We do what we need to do and we do not collaborate to any fellow bounty hunters when it comes to finding a good project to participate with.

Gaining respect and trust in many bounty Hunters now is difficult as many of bounty Hunters are cheating in terms of doing multiple accounts in single bounty and they are turning in scammers sometimes so its not good for many good bounty Hunters as they are being affected by it and many of bounty managers or project management dont trust bounty Hunters and implementing the Kyc for us.

yes, once again, we don't need to think about that. the most important thing is to stay focused on this work and look for projects that really deserve to be followed. especially now that I see the market situation has begun to improve, so it's time to focus on collecting tokens from the prize campaign.

There are some bounties that I found and I think that is fair because payments are accumulated at the end of the month, and that is very much in accordance with those contained in the rules of the thread. I think to look for a bounty is also examined first, or looking for a professional bounty manager is usually clearer for payment problems.

We need a trade union into which the amount allocated to the bounty campaign will initially be transferred and after it ends, the tokens will be sent to the addresses.

The main solution would probably be having a "bounty hunters union" but that's unlikely to happen.

There are experience and quality hunters who only picks good campaigns and there are also junkie hunters who joins every campaign he/she sees.

You mean escrow?

Well it's not their fault this days there are few options for bounty hunters with the dreaded scarcity of bounty project available so the take advantage of the scarcity and try to cut down but one thing is sure if you are a quality poster good bounties should find you out

EXCUSE ME!!!! bounty hunters dont need to reclaim anuthing!
they must be honored and beg as for the TEAM ICO AND INVESTORS ALWAYS blame them for the dump.
2018-19 was a big bmess and it is not a triuble from bounty hunters.
well to make it short!!!
WHY A PROJECT send tokens of them for payment if they can use ETH or BTC?
well to be proud of i am into ANYONE bounty and they are not risking their tokens now as they will pay with BTC!
so lemme know which side is a problem now!

You should understand that any bounty company is based primarily on trust - you cannot dictate to the project creator how to manage his money. Very often, bounty hunters do not pay anything at all, they are deceived or paid little. Unfortunately, this is the risk of the profession and you cannot get away from here - choose wisely companies!

Regarding my choice, I am a member of this bounty now https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5156163

P.S. it is not a paid

actually, these days bounty hunting is in very bad condition same as the projects. when they didn't able to find enough funds they cutoff bounty hunters payments first place. But there are many many hunters today. So they don't care who not going to support them. and we can't do anything for that. that is the saddest part.

The only solution for this is unity. It will not be effective if not all bounty hunters will agree to the plan. The plan is quite good but we have to consider other people before we implement it. There should be an organization that handles all members of Bitcointalk because that is our common ground and standard requirement for the organization.

The big problem here is that bounty hunters do not run in there bounties in a contract, and as such treated like a cheap advertisers. Though I doubt that even with contracts bounty hunters will be treated more nicely. I think its either the platform or the bounty managers should impose certain rules that will help use be protected in the course of the project.

I don;t think they are goign to pay bounty hunters first before we promote their project, we really need a coop for bounty hunters, but I doubt if bounty hunters will cooperate, bount yhunting is like a gambling now, even if they comply to bounty hunter's demand there's still no guaranty that bounty hunters will make a profit, the token must have a value first.

No solution unless all of us are going to ask the amount we want and not promote them at all. Sadly this isn't going to happen, bounty platforms were created for the purpose of assuring the pay for the hunters but even them were scammed. They see the weakness in all these bounty hunters and to have cheap marketing services is to keep us at their mercy. 

For others to know, there are some bounty hunters who are cheating. Creating alt accounts to have higher reward, copying content of others in content creation campaign etc.

If I will be the creator of the token, I will not do payment first to the bounty hunters. Launching a bounty campaign doesn't mean that the project will become successful in the future that is why they can't risk any amount if they are not sure if the project will be successful in the future.


Hmmmmmm I think the only solution for this is just don't join in bounty campaigns but who in the world will do that if they know that they can get money in bounty campaigns :D.

There are some bounty campaign projects which are obviously they're making bounty hunters and investors as stupid one or they are fooling them actually. And most of them they always took the blame of dumping the price of their token to the bounty hunters which is wrong, but still there are few project campaign remain transparent and honest despite of small rate for the bounty participants, where its up to us if we join or not. But for me, bounty hunters is the heart of success of the project campaign., especially if there whitepaper and road map is good and attainable, for sure the community will support it.

I think the project managers and investors are looking to bounty hunters like they are dumping machines. So they are altering the rules and rewards. They are creating vesting periods for bounty hunters while everyone is trading, after the vesting period tokens are usually turn to bits and pieces.

Yes.
Escrow accounts are already used in paying bounty campaigns, but these are isolated cases.

there is even a dexico project that is indeed escrow in paying hunter bounties. Payments are sent to all participants but then the team all disappears without any news. then there is no escrow guarantee or not.

This is the problem with bounty hunters, they just want money and profit, they are not at all interested in the product itself,,, and remember, they were the ones who provided 0 value, so projects eventually died, they even dumped mainly, so projects did not see this coming. Everybody blames everyone but bounty hunters were the first to have nothing to lose. And now the tides have turned.

Payment can be requested in 50% stable coin and %50 native tokens, when hunters become strict on the rules of engagement, things will fair well. And BM should look for every clever way to catch and reveal bounty cheaters for they are epidemics in this social platform.

As far as I am concerned, I don't think there is a way bounty hunters can could be the determinants of which bounty project is to be promoted and which is not to be promoted.That is not our own to determine. What I think we can do as bounty hunters in order not to be wasting our time and resources in promoting project is not productive is that we should carefully look for projects that are of good repute and with future prospect to partake of. There are still good bounty projects up till now that are rewarding their members well. Not only in that regard can we enjoy profits that we desire, we can also limit the rate at which we dump the tokens for little money. Whatever has taken our time and energy should pay us in returns dearly. Let us learn to participate in projects that are promising.

I really don't think it is possible for bounty hunters to come together and create a set of rules to follow and people will follow it, because we are too much and their are people who really need money, so they are ready to promote any project just to make the money. The best solution is for every hunter to research well about any project to see it is legit and have good reputation before promoting it.

Bounty hunting can be a mess for the projects involved. They have to deal with so many cheats, bad quality posts, then the cheats complaining about not getting their share, and so on. It's a whole mess.

You are being mistreated because you are greedy and choose to work for scraps. I don't see a way out of this. You'd have to require devs to pay you in bitcoin or one of the existing top 20 cryptocurrencies and not work for their tokens but there's so many poor people on this forum who will work for any amount of money even for empty promises.
Bounty hunting is mostly dead.

The only way Bounty hunters can reclaim their respect is only through a union which can possible sanction or approve bounty programmes with a signed agreement with various projects. But then this is not achievable because the cryptocurrency market is decentralized Nd everyone is free to operate as he or she wishes

It is true that we have lost that special attention we normally get before from project owners.. This owing to quite some myriads of reason, of which I will only highlight just 2. Firstly, so many latest projects struggle to reach targets,  which in sharp contrast to projects 2 years ago clearly shows a downtrend in the situation of sales and target actualization..Thus,  frustration sets in which gradually sure will lead to a failed promise.

Secondly,  it's  no news that bounty hunters often time sell their rewards too cheap.

Some projects have been successful, listed on the coinmarket but still haven't paid for bounty hunters, such as Buddy project! Despite that, bounty hunters with large numbers cannot control it. We have not included spam, bot. I think what bounty hunters do for a long time and the amount received is too little, not in accordance with their effort and time.

In 2017, the amount of bounty hunters received is very high, at that time the number of bounty hunters is now many times now. Now that projects offer bonus programs, they limit the pool to an entire campaign, imagine $ 10,000 for more than 5000 participants, very little money. However, the project does not guarantee success in the future, of course paying for the bounty hunter will not happen if the project fails.

They adjusted maybe because they know with big bounty it will only make the project to suffer especially when the bounty hunters dump.
In addition, it's not only them are seeing this possibility but their potential investors as well and they will not invest if they see there's a big allocation for the bounty.

Time flies so fast, there's a changes that we need to embrace, I don't see bounty hunters are disrespected here, they will only be disrespected if they will not pay for the effort.

If the project has enough funds, they can order advertising. I don't think they treat bounty hunters with respect. Perhaps when it will change and the project team will cooperate with bounty hunters, but so far it does not work as it should.

I'm not one of the bounty hunters that need money so badly, if you keep telling that bounty hunters are like beggars and they need money badly, they will treat us like beggars, we are professionals and we can do to make the ICO popular and can leave anytime when there are bad reports about the ICO that we are promoting.

In the world of crypto bounties, some of them think that bounty hunters are profit hungry people and that is the reason why they are joining bounties. We need to have some kind of security so that we will not be taken for granted.

The network we are in is decentralized, so this is not possible, there is no organization or ruling body that can put such laws into effect.

What should be done I think is for bounty managers to make it compulsory to the project to pay a specified amount of money to them(in the projects coins/tokens), such funds will be kept(escrowed)till the project is over or should in case the campaign owners decide to make an exit scam, this will really go a long way to reduce scam activities as well as reassure bounties hunters that they are definitely not working for free.

This topic is very important indeed. Earlier, when the ICO market only began to gain momentum, the participants of the bounty were worth their weight in gold, that is, the payment was really decent and timely. Now we see disrespect for the work of the participants of the bounty, both on the part of some bounty menjers and the administrators of the ICO. I personally know a few examples when the administrators themselves answered me that you earned too much, this is wrong. That is, they themselves came up with the conditions and refused them themselves at the time of payment. Also, very often I hear accusations against participants of generosity that it is the participants of generosity who reduce the price of tokens and coins on the stock exchanges, although I myself have already seen many times how early investors and funds did this. All this and more shows the attitude of project administrators and managers to bounty participants and it is not very good. How can you solve this? I think there is one way, is to create a site where to report such problems and talk about those who are deceiving the participants of the bounty.

Firstly, the payment method for most of the bounties is the respective tokens of the project. So whether they are paying in advance or after the campaign doesn't matter since the token will be valuable only when it is listed on an exchange. Surely getting paid in advance would be a benefit if the token is already listed on an exchange but that isn't the case for most of the projects. Secondly, most of the bounties these days require KYC to be done which is again a burden. So getting paid in advance wont help you if you are not in compliance with the KYC procedure.

Without bounty hunters? I think their project will not promote to the market as easy as bounty hunters will do . Project manager will pay for expensive advertisement unlike what the small amount of salary that they give to the bounty hunter to promote their project. I think bounty hunter will deserved to respect and to appreciate their work by giving right amount of salary.

I see where you got that thought from. i think its because bounty hunter has been known as dumper. in telegram so many bounty hunter keep asking about stupid question or asking about question that they already answer even its not long ago, its getting repetitive and its annoying them. some of bounty hunter is just to lazy to read and do research. i think we can try to remaind the developer that bounty is the place where they got their community and investor, also bounty hunter is the token holder, and a lot of project investor come from bounty hunter, including myself.

Well, so you can put forward a proposal that payments take place in Bitcoin or Ethereum. Many on this forum will support your undertaking.

it is already happening. Many projects already pay in ethereum or bitcoin, but there are two problems: payments are very small or the number of participants is very limited.

Theres no solution to this one because Bounties isnt a right for you to make such rules.As a marketer you have agreed all the terms on the first place and you know the risk behind it right? On not being paid or being scammed on the end.Even how hard you do push up on claiming your rights or respect it wouldnt change at all.
This is why as a bounty hunter you should research as hard as you can on joining up projects which is pretty legitimate on your view than choosing blindly.

There's no way right now bounty hunter earn respect due to many reason just like dumping all the token at once when the reward has been distributed and Farming on the same bounty which it can affect also because he have the great power to dump all that would result the price crashing of the coins or token

even though the bounty dumps coins or tokens I think if a project with a good market can overcome this. because the coins earned by the bounty hunter are not much compared to the bonuses given to investors.

Bounty hunters never lost their respect, we just do not know how to enforce it, mots developers knows the value of hunters clearly and they all respect their role, but their cheating nature would not allow them to do the right thing, most developers have cheating nature except proven otherwise, it could even not be the direct owner of the project that is doing that, but it could be someone they have placed in charge of organizing the whole bounty campaign that is full of cheat.

I agree with you that we can all have our rules that will bind and protect all hunters, if we can all speak with one voice, and then we can achieve this. There is an adage in my language that says, whether the boss sells or not, the wages of the worker must be complete. They hired us to work, and should be ready to pay us, if they want our services, they have to pay us as we work, not that policy of paying at the end of the campaign, because we don’t submit our work at the end of the campaign too, we do that daily.

So hard to tell about the problem. Bounty hunter payment usually depend on how much Fund on ico can be collect, if you can't reach hard cap then there is big chance your reward can be lower than beginning pool, or bad case we didn't get anything

I think all bounty hunters already know that. the risk that we will get, get a little, get nothing, or get it but the results cannot be enjoyed. I think that has become commonplace in a bounty campaign.

The only solution I think is escrow and payment by cash (BTC, ETH). Because even if the project pays tokens to the bounty hunters, if the tokens are not listed or have very low value, the hunters won't get anything back.

The problem is that there are too many desperate bounty hunters out here. Even if a group of hunters decide to boycott projects in which the promoters are too greedy, there will be enough people around to take their place. The system is also heavily biased against the hunters. Nowadays most of the bounties are not paying, and the bounty hunters are helpless in such situations.

The only solution is weekly payments in Ethereum.

Anything else is dangerous as you might work for a project and never get paid, or get paid in useless coins that have no value.

Certain factors are really needed to be considered, this facts are reality inside the market even there's a lots of people who will join hands it will still filled by those remaining hunters who's willing to continue taking part of the projects.

This solution is indeed very good. But most projects don't want to do this. Even very rarely do we find projects that pay weekly in Ethereum. Because most projects also do not want to spend funds unless they issue tokens for bounty allocations. So this solution is good but difficult to realize.

It's natural to see bounty hunters get disrespected by these devs by not paying them as promised.

The only thing you should do is not to advertise a non-scam project in order for you to be respected. Just do your own research and it could make a difference.

Projects should realize that bounties are part of their marketing plan, to which they should allocate a certain amount of actual currency (digital or not). If bitcointalk devs had values and understood basic principles they wouldn't allow this. From my experience 90% of bounties are worthless. Is this what bitcointalk wants?

The promise of payment on their own token after months of work, should not be enough for us. Certainly they will find people or bots that will accept their silly terms, but what they will get in return? Messages like good project.

For this problem bounty managers should be also held accountable. Most bounty threads I read have terms like:
- If soft cap not reached you work for nothing,
- Terms and payments can be changed any time the team wants,
- Bounty can be prolonged from 4 weeks to 8 months or until some idiot actually buys a few coins, etc.

"I wish there is something like' we must pay bounty hunters,their payment first". I think this is imposible because no one can ensure bounty hunter will promote project until end, also after get paid bounty hunter can leave project without promote it.

Reclaim their respect? That's is so hard and that's why be bounty hunter only for side job

About this, I think what we really have no choice than to hope that whichever project we are promoting will actually turn out fine. Most of the time, those campaigning for a project are just too much compared to the amount of money allocated to bounty hunters. So, what will happen when such a situation arise? Bounty hunters will have to get little amount of money which to everyone might look ridiculous and annoying but if more allocation is awarded to us, the project might run into losses. So what exactly should we do? Let's just hope for the best at all time.

the best solution to this is to join bounty platforms that have values. some platforms have rules and regulations guiding their site and they stand on such rules. it is only here in bitcointalk that hunters are at the messy of their some managers who does what ever they deem fit to hunters.

do you think we can scrub the bad ones out of bounty hunting?  That will be a very difficult work to do or I do say rather impossible.  The only solution became for the team to lock bounty tokens and release them in batches

If project is good and grows as per planned by team , the most happy will be bounty hunters but if there are scammed projects, then obviously bounty Hunters are disrespected. Only good projects can reclaim the respect.

it is necessary to filter information for bounty hunters and be clever to choose projects that are being worked on. the bounty allocation should be above 5% and that will make the project really work real.

The number of participants is not the problem, team pay whenever they wish, they pay when the token value is nearly zero and the token become useless since you won't be able to withdraw if you sell.

Developers are abusing bounty hunters because bounty hunters are not cooperative at all,we don't have each others back but I'm happy that flags are raisable for any bounty projects that doesnt stay on the promises they make for bounty hunters e.g forcing KYC on hunters after bounty ends

Regarding the unpaid project campaign, I don't think it's all wrong for Crypto developers, there are also mistakes from our bounty hunters, one of our mistakes is to make prices fall, so many tokens die as a result of invoices from bounty hunters. developers are very careful in providing tokens for bounty hunters, they must really make a mature concept, don't let them send tokens to bounty hunters rather than sacrifice investors, and they will have difficulty raising prices again.

This is something that I don't understand. Most of the times, the bounty pool is less than 1% of the total budget. If they pay a small amount of the bounty in ETH or BTC, the total cost is going to be a minute fraction of the total revenue. The developers need to admit that bounty hunters deserve good rewards. They work hard to promote these projects, and in the end they are being treated like beggars.

I don't think that 0.5-1% of the tokens that were distributed to the bounty hunters can dump the price too much, it is all about how the team can keep the token near the token sale price at least. Some of the projects don't care about the token price, they converted ico money into fiat and can work on the product for the next 6-12 months.

The market aligns the cost of labor in the crypto space. Not many here openly agree that getting 10-50K$ in equivalent for a couple of articles or a video is an adequate payment. This is a lot. But I know such cases. Bounty hunters will be respected when they perform well (this is not always the case) and will receive an appropriate payment. And of course, control. But it will not be a free environment.

bounty hunters will earn their respect back when most of you stop promoting shitty projects. Devs know that most of the hunters are always looking for a project with a big reward, so they will pretend to want to give hunters big reward that they can not match. Look at the members here with high ranks like hero and legendary members. Hardly will you see them joining shitty project. we need to make them understand our worth. by the time many hunters start rejecting some campaigns, you will see that they will start taking hunters serious.

Let's think logically. Now we have IEO. That is, we can invest in the project a little money and know exactly what these coins can cost something on the stock exchange. That is, the ICO has lost its relevance. Bounty hunters have no hope.

I think it would depend on the project, if we are lucky enough to join a promising and successful project, then we are paid enough and be satisfied, however if not, its the matter of patience, if the project doesn't pays us that means they are unsuccessful, we just have to join and hope for another good bounty out there. Maybe in that way we earn back our respect.

First of all 1% is not "a lot". And bounty can be classified as one of the needs of the project. Without efficient advertising, the project will never be able to attract interest from the investors. And I don't know why you don't consider bounty as an "effective form of advertising". It is even more surprising, as you are currently taking part in a bounty campaign. Could you please enlighten us a bit more?

But now, the hunters throw almost all the projects , even from the last project just steps away from cut pool , it is very sad that I did that , I think you need the creators of these projects to be punished !

There are still few project developers that still appreciate the effort bounty hunters put to promote their projects. However the majority falls into the category explained by the creator of this thread, especially when it comes to the time of distributing tokens, then problem arise. The idea that bounty hunters will agree to participate in some bounties and neglect others can never work because we are not the same.

But the fact we cannot expect the ico project to distribute the token initially and it is not fair also show to send the the tokens for the users before they complete their work.
When the time investors receive the fun at the same time you could have expected bounded distribution for the participants that might be fair. Then and if the forum allegate any DT member to scan the bounty project and confirm their legitimacy then it will be great.

Yes, I see that a year ago it was much more profitable to do bounty, people were not deceived and paid on time, the projects were good and quickly went to the stock exchange. it's hard to understand a good project right now or not

Well, if the developers keep treating bounty hunters bad, there won't be enough hunters to promote the project.
You can see there are many projects are failed to raise enough money nowadays.
What we can do as bounty hunter is, never supporting project who have developers like them, and search for other good project with a good devs.

Delaying payments or reducing them is the most common of a bounty. In such cases, bounty hunters can make anti-advertising project, perhaps this is the only way.

I don't think any project will agree to make any payment upfront without the job being done first when it has to do with bounties.  But I know payment can be held on escrow just like Bountyhive or bounty0x usually do

if we see, they prioritize investors more than bounty hunters. logically, investors give money, and the worst possibility that happens to a project is a scam, right? well, that way they can steal from investors, whether it's 100% investor money, or by listing to a market exchange with a low exchange rate.

while bounty hunters, they work to promote the project, without any money coming in. so, the team thinks that they don't get anything from the bounty hunter. even if you think about it, bounty hunters actually work very efficiently to promote their projects so investors want to come in, for example, bounty facebook, telegram, twitter, blogs, artike, youtube, and signatures.

the bounty hunter will slowly disappear.
the solution for the bounty hunter in my opinion if you want to continue to get the benefits of crypto must trade.

in my opinion it is very difficult to run an idea that you convey ... because the bounty hunters come from various countries which in fact we don't know at all .. maybe there are some who hope to improve the image of the bounty hunters in the eyes of the developers who launched a project ... but some are just looking for money only ... they don't care about their own image as a bounty hunter who is looked down on by many parties ... so, let's together change each other's style in participating in the campaign bounty project ...

Well I guess, this is the cruelty of bounty hunting. Since many projects look towards exchanges now for promoting their projects rather than towards bounty hunters, and also that bounty hunters will take part in a particular project no matter how low is the payout, this doesn’t make their case stronger. Few managers are great and treat bounty hunters like a human, but unfortunately, the market is dominated by most of the harsh projects.

If you are asking if there is a solution, I can say that there is always a solution but everything should be identified to be able to find the right way to do it. Since the problem involves so many parties, I think it will really take time and effort to do it. The really big question is, will both parties cooperate? Will they really put down their ego and meet halfway?

I think that this can not be happen because bounty hunters often like to work on their own, they dont wanna cooperate to any fellow bounty hunters because they just want quick bucks just like myself. But i cannot say that what you suggest is a bad idea. I think we should try that.

in my opinion this time is not the project that considers the bounty hunter to be useless, but if you look at it, it is the bounty hunter who often projects as an example you can see bountyhive there if the results are not as expected they always criticize the project and think the project is a scam and maybe aside from that there are many bounty hunters like this.

developer know if many bounty hunter cheat. manager give them some rules, but they broke it. like multiple account in the same project, or the other cheat. hunter just do what they do unprofessionally.
not all developer disrespect hunter, some of them appreciate their work, because hunter give support to spread their word

I think this is a pretty good suggestion, but I think this is quite difficult to implement, given the difficulty of making bounty hunters to think. other than that the bounty hunters lacked a major influence to implement regulations for a project.