Bitcoin Forum

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=923025

The only possible of ban is posting actually news on the "News" board and I always added links. And it was maximum 2 articles per day.

No spam, no plagiarism. Of course, I have written to your e-mail and of course, I've had no answer.

A female of baronial rank has the title baroness. In the kingdom of England, the medieval Latin word baro, baronis was used originally to denote a tenant-in-chief of the early Norman kings who held his lands by the feudal tenure of "barony" (in Latin per baroniam), and who was entitled to attend the Great Council (Magnum Concilium) which by the 13th century had developed into the Parliament of England. Feudal baronies (or "baronies by tenure") are now obsolete in England and without any legal force but any such historical titles are held in gross, that is to say are deemed to be enveloped within a more modern extant peerage title also held by the holder, sometimes along with vestigial manorial rights and tenures by grand serjeanty.

A woman of baronial rank has the title baroness. In the Kingdom of England, the medieval Latin word baro, baronis was used originally to denote a tenant-in-chief of the early Norman kings who held his lands by the feudal tenure of "barony" (in Latin per baroniam), and who was entitled to attend the Great Council (Magnum Concilium) which by the 13th century had developed into the Parliament of England.[4] Feudal baronies (or "baronies by tenure") are now obsolete in England and without any legal force but any such historical titles are held in gross, that is to say are deemed to be enveloped within a more modern extant peerage title also held by the holder, sometimes along with vestigial manorial rights and tenures by grand serjeanty.

A female of baronial rank has the title baroness. In the kingdom of England, the medieval Latin word baro, baronis was used originally to denote a tenant-in-chief of the early Norman kings who held his lands by the feudal tenure of "barony" (in Latin per baroniam), and who was entitled to attend the Great Council (Magnum Concilium) which by the 13th century had developed into the Parliament of England. Feudal baronies (or "baronies by tenure") are now obsolete in England and without any legal force but any such historical titles are held in gross, that is to say are deemed to be enveloped within a more modern extant peerage title also held by the holder, sometimes along with vestigial manorial rights and tenures by grand serjeanty.

George Gor, CEO of Coinidol.com commented:
"The project is leaded by Bright Bee PR agency. It's a good advertising move for the promotion company of token to attract the baron as the face of the company. But it's still to prove, that the project deserves any serious attention, because the token is based on Blockchain technology, that has only hundred of nodes. It is very week point for the future of this Blockchain".

A female of baronial rank has the title baroness. In the kingdom of England, the medieval Latin word baro, baronis was used originally to denote a tenant-in-chief of the early Norman kings who held his lands by the feudal tenure of "barony" (in Latin per baroniam), and who was entitled to attend the Great Council (Magnum Concilium) which by the 13th century had developed into the Parliament of England. Feudal baronies (or "baronies by tenure") are now obsolete in England and without any legal force but any such historical titles are held in gross, that is to say are deemed to be enveloped within a more modern extant peerage title also held by the holder, sometimes along with vestigial manorial rights and tenures by grand serjeanty.

George Gor, CEO of Coinidol.com commented:

"The project is leaded by Bright Bee PR agency. It's a good advertising move for the promotion company of token to attract the baron as the face of the company. But it's still to prove, that the project deserves any serious attention, because the token is based on Blockchain technology, that has only hundred of nodes. It is very week point for the future of this Blockchain".

25. Ban evasion (using or creating accounts while one of your accounts is banned) is not allowed.[e]

25. If you get banned (temporarily or permanently) and create a new account to continue posting / sending PMs, it's considered ban evasion. The only exception is creating a thread in Meta about your ban.

Зa 2 мecяцa тaк никoгo и нe нaшли?

Copy:
Original:

The only possible of ban is posting actually news on the "News" board and I always added links. And it was maximum 2 articles per day.

Why not? I used to work for Coinidol, but now i'm not.

You post in Press board, but also in Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion which is clearly visible in your post history. You also admit that you work for Coindol  :


You and other 2 users are actually privatized that board for your personal interests posting more then 50% of all threads. In such posting you and some others have often forgotten to put source links, but such post are deleted.

This is just one saved example where you did not add source link :

https://web.archive.org/web/20190706102713/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5160565.msg51673653

Just Create a new one, Simple and everyone is happy ;D

Given that OP clearly works for cointelegraph/coinidol, and his entire post history is just flooding the Press and Altcoin Discussion boards with articles of dubious quality without ever contributing an original thought or comment, it isn't going to take Sherlock Holmes to identify a new account owned by this user. In this case, it will likely promptly also be banned for ban evasion. No one is going to miss this account. Press board is supposed to be for "Notable press hits", not utter nonsense like "Bitcoin Could See FOMO Fireworks For 4th of July (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5161796)" or "Russia Is Getting Serious About Blockchain, but Remains on the Fence (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5155063.0;dt)".

If not me and few other users, the Press section would be empty) Ok.

great news and apparently this news can bring another popularity for crypto currency and for the norwegian air ticket company it's a good decision to accept crypto to sell ticket for fast and convenient transactions for their customer holder of bitcoin. Because bitcoin including whole crypto currency are useful for many ways as mode of payment.

And why is forbidden to work for cryptocurrency site? You are saying nonsense)

If not for you and a few other users, the Press section would only have notable press hits in it, would have far less spam, and discussion would be of a much higher quality. As it stands, there is some good discussion, but there are also plenty of signature spammers diluting it all with nonsense, because it is very easy to pick out a couple of key words from the article's headline and spin them in to some generic utter trash like this:


Please quote me where I said that.

Well, it's my fault. Well. I really worked for Coinidol until this May. And it's really funny that you banned me only when I left Coinidol.

You can't fight hydra, you can't find spammers  ;D

I did not ban you, this is job of moderators or admins on this forum. And you are not banned because of that post which link I posted, you get second chance and that post was deleted - but other user is found other post for which you get banned.

As o_e_l_e_o say, you did not contributed to the forum in any constructive way, copy / pasting news day by day is something you can do for long time, but almost every forum user who is doing that is forget to add link source from time to time.


We find you and few others, Press in now much better board, and do not worry to much for others, Report to moderator button is free to use.

Well, tell me if it's not against the rules to plagiarise yourself on every post? Cause when I report to moderators post of such guys https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5168732.msg52770189#msg52770189
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5168732.msg52775105#msg52775105
simple plagiarism! - nobody cares.

This is by no means plagiarism if you refer to a user JollyGood, this is just his way to fight against scams on this forum. Some other user/s had a similar opinion as you, but mods do not agree with such an opinion. I personally don't consider it plagiarism, although some may find it irritating to see this way of posting. However, there is a big difference in what you did and what this user does, read more at the following link :

Mods requesting ban for jollyGood (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5190836.0)

~snip

I'm not going to create another account. I will just leave this forum.

Well, since your main account got banned, what are you actually doing posting outside of your ban appeal thread (cherry on top - in a well known spam mega thread)? That's ban evasion!

Also, leaving JollyGood retaliatory feedback for uncovering spam accounts is bad from whichever way you look at it. It means you're either encouraging the spam feast happening there, or you're actually part of it, which is more reason to be banned if the ban evasion wasn't enough..

And what happened to this?

What happened? The forum turned to a highly-centralised place with spam, fake accusations and fraudsters.

Its actually better now that those awful CoinIdol articles aren't being posted in the News section every day.

I don't understand your beef with JollyGood and mosprognoz. I think they are just passionate about scam busting. But I don't have to understand, because you're banned.

This is by no means plagiarism if you refer to a user JollyGood, this is just his way to fight against scams on this forum. Some other user/s had a similar opinion as you, but mods do not agree with such an opinion. I personally don't consider it plagiarism, although some may find it irritating to see this way of posting. However, there is a big difference in what you did and what this user does, read more at the following link :

Mods requesting ban for jollyGood (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5190836.0)

Where are all Coinidol news? I miss them:(

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=923025

The only possible of ban is posting actually news on the "News" board and I always added links. And it was maximum 2 articles per day.

No spam, no plagiarism. Of course, I have written to your e-mail and of course, I've had no answer.

BEWARE - Jollygood and his Major Scam team IS A MAJOR SCAM
Never trust to this proven liar, biggest ever spammer, abuser and plagiator.
He slept with some of moderators to receive his rigged trust.

TO SEE THE REAL TRUST OF THIS HIMSELF-CALLED "IMBECILE": tap on "Trust"- "untrusted feedback" - "show ratings"

Now you're making alt accounts just to troll JollyGood?


Well that makes one of us.