Bitcoin Forum

There is a same rule in all of signature campaigns
"You must keep the signature till end of the campaign"

In my opinion it's really unfair.
Assume that a campaign includes 20 weeks. One person participate from week 1 until week 10 and makes effort for advertising the ICO. But he/she decided to participate in another campaign. In this case, bounty managers remove all the stakes that have been earned before. Don't you think it's unfair? In my opinion, he/she should give the reward for those weeks that had worn the signature.

Yes it is unfair but when someone read the rule and agree with the term then why would they complain? I personally would not enroll for such terms. I would rather have my signature space empty.

If they have this rule from the beginning and they clearly state how long the campaign will run, I am okay with it. But nowadays a lot of projects extend their sales (because of low sale numbers) and hence extend their bounty. If this is the case it should be allowed to leave such campaigns without losing all previous earned stakes.

There is no use when you complain here. Every campaign has its own managers and team, and they decide the rules for their own benefits most of the times. If you don't agree with it, complain before you start participating and if they don't budge, then don't join their campaign. This is the same as no refund policy in all case at some e-commerce stores. It isn't fair for buyers so don't buy there.

If you feel its unfair then stop participating in altcoin bounty signature campaigns.

I went through your post history and all I can say that you need to improve the content level of your posts. Even if they might seem good to you, an decent manager would consider them as shitposts and some people might as well report them for moderation. Teach yourself basics about bitcoin and trading and try visiting other sections of the forum. By doing so you would prime your account to be ready to participate in bitcoin signature campaigns which are more prestigious then shitcoin bounties.

All the best!

Honestly and literally speaking, it is actually unfair. As you can see there are some bounty campaign they've already inform the community about their rules. But even they have that kind of rules, there are some Bounty Manager will allow you to remove your siggy if you are personally pm the BM and permission to leave the campaign with the respect of BM position, and mostly if you leave nicely they will save or freeze your stakes total.

If its included from the very start of the campaign. You need to think if you are willing to dedicate your time up to the end of the campaign. But if you think that you can't or there will be some change of mind in the future and you can't dedicate to wear their signature until the end, don't join them.

There might be some managers that are considerably understanding with this situation if you can just ask them politely to consider you. But overall, if the decision is final, respect the managers decision.

There were few campaigns which act like you said,
and some of campaigns also have same rules, but they still gave you stakes which you deserved it when you've decided to leave the campaign.
IMO it's unfair since you have promoted their site for some weeks (you have wasted your time too) and you didn't get any payment just because you leave in the middle of campaign.

anyway, i agree with this

Bounty manager decide the rules for the bounty campaign show so you can't change any rules decided by the bounty manager if you really think it is unfair then you need to participate on campaign where this rules are not available.

The reason why you are changing from one signature to another might be the project you are already promoting is not going to be successful right? Then why you are expecting rewards from then because even if you have them will no use.If you are just changing for no reason then I don't think it is unfair to remove the stakes of you.

in my opinion you should always read and know the rules that already exist in the bounty program, this is very fair if there are people who break the rules in the campaign program and are disqualified. because there is already a provision from the manager so we have to follow it

Some bounty hunters find it offensive and unfair but they have to realize that if its already indicated in the first place, they have to obey and respect the rules that is being implemented.

As I've said, things can be settled through talks and it's okay to reach out to the manager for this matter. If the bounty manager responded positively, you are good but if the manager can't grant your request, respect him/her decision.

Certainly, yes it is really unfair! So I suggest never join in a campaign like this, just join only as much as possible with a campaign project that will only run for 1 to 3 months only, over this period don't attempt to do it. But there are some managers they are giving consideration to save yours stakes but majority of them are not.

Depends on the team or into its manager because most of todays rule's you would still able to get stakes even if you do leave out but there were managers
who do void all of those stakes if you decide to leave thats the hardest part on being a bounty hunter where you would leave no choice but to stay up if
you do like to have stakes or not.Its a matter of decisions though on which one you would choose up.

You are the one who should be blacklisted and disqualified for any of bounty on here. Did you read OP's question? When did he break the rules?

most of them doing that because of higher pay rates they will get

It is also unfair imo. Participants should be allowed to leave and still be rewarded for the weeks they promoted the project. Sometime, that rule is not specifically stated in the rules and the best thing to do is to confirm it first with the manager before wearing the signature to be safe.

Additionally, it is better to join short campaigns instead of more than 10-week or "when ICO ends" campaigns.

In some case, there is also a lack of clarity. In the beginning, the manager could say yes but then the team decides no, just like what happened with Anyone. The point is, with altcoin bounty campaign, everything is really risky. You can get thousands of dollars or just $3 for months.

If you don't want any of those risky scenarios, then weekly paid campaign is your choice.

This is pointed out if you have taken part with one of bounty campaign you have to promote the project until end.

I think to take part bounty campaign is not only choose the new bounty program, but you have to convince that the bounty campaign that you choose is really promising and will give you a profit when the campaign end. Which is mean you need an analyst against it, there is many aspect that you consider before choosing bounty program. Hence, if you have chosen one campaign you don't need look for another campaign just stay on it until the program end.

Yeah, I look it is a fair thing as long as the bounty manager have said that for those bounty hunter who remove the signature before the campaign end will not get a reward in the rule. So as when you don't comply these things you will get as a result, and didn't give a negative point to those manager who have a such rule.

This is the other rule that I hate in most bounty campaigns. It's unfair to force hunters to comply to this when they can freely extend their token sale (including the bounty) for a few more months. They should be allowed to leave and get paid.

Doing 10 weeks of work is too long to begin with. Wow. How much longer was the campaign if this person did up until 10 weeks? When would they have been paid? Campaigns should not be that long to begin with.

I also don't care what anyone says or what rules or terms there are, not paying someone for the weeks they were their signature is EXTREMELY petty and I wouldn't invest 10 cents in a shithole run bounty that treats people that way.


Go back to sleep.

Its in the rules, so if you read the rules before participating in the campaign and still decided to join then you agree and understand what it means.

Its really unfair but thats how it is, if you want to get your rewards then might as well finish the campaign and refrain from joining to other project if you really want your hard work be paid off.

Or try joining in campaign that pays in btc, every week you'll get what you deserve and you're free to join any other campaign that pays higher.

unless if he rush to apply and didnt read the rules carefully  . ive seen alot of participants doing this practice and they end up complaining at the middle of the campaign  .

no its not . rules are there to make the campaign fair but if someone disagrees with it then the campaign havent any obligations with them  .

btc campaigns are infact more stricter and btc campaigns are also limited now   . you cant expect to be accepted easily and managers dont like jumping from one campaign to the other .

That's it, rules cover everything and before you participate that rule already been attached to particular campaigns, you need to comply or else you'll be wasting your time and effort from those previous days/weeks of your participations, it's best to find campaigns that you really support as you can be patients to wait till it finish the campaign period, else, better to join campaigns that paid btc in a weekly basis.

Before participating in the signature campaign, of course there are certain rules that have been made by the bounty manager so that each participant must obey them until the campaign is over, but there are some managers / bounties who really provide convenience for participants who have long joined, in fact, can remove the signature at the time of the bounty still running and the manager will lock their stake with certain requirements.

Rules is rules and you should follow it.If you do have plans on leaving out on a campaign to find another one then better not to join at all because you would
just simply waste up your effort from the start since you wont get any stakes if you do leave.

These are common rules that bounty had,so its up to you if you plan to switch or not but if you do see that leaving out for another new worthy project to promote on then your choice.

Try to talk to the bounty manager if he can give you an exception lol

But then normally when they say it on the rules you wouldn't get an exception, you just have to finish the campaign and wait til the 20th week. But would you really try to join a campaign that will last 20 weeks?  Must be very promising project if I do that.

Simple way to prevent these is to stop participating in these altcoin based shittoken bounty campaigns. I am surprised that people in this forum actually try to make new accounts everyday in order to get into these shittoken bounties and then complain about the tokens not rising in price.

The idea of "second to bitcoin" is a delusion. You all need to stop believing into that false promise that this new token will become the second bitcoin and so on.

Boycott all altcoin Bounties and stop participating in those. If this can be done on a large scale then they can be forced to pay bitcoin for payment which in turn would be good for all you bounty hunters.

Rules are rules, once they agreed on it and wear the signature they should have to follow it.
I'd rather find suitable rules if the manager doesn't want to give credit to my previous effort just because i want to stop or join another campaign.
Anyway, i don't like wasting efforts for 10 to 20 weeks without any credits/payments it's just like you are working for them freely.

they should ask the bounty manager first if they are already allowed to remove thier signature and join in other bounty campaign. And besides it is on the rules that every participant should not remove the signature till the end of the campaign.

If any of you guys still expect that a team of a project will treat you fairly, then you should stop it. They run a business, in an industry with no clear rules, where everyone can simply disappear and stop working after they raised some money and tell their investors that they are no longer able to pursue their goals.

Don't join bounties without any escrow with real tokens, or you'll get scammed forever. Even if removal of the signature campaign won't make you lost your stake, you already lost a valuable time if, in the end, you get tokens with no value on it.

You are not entitled to your own actions once you have sold your signature to some bounty for a couple of shitcoins. If you want that then go for the bitcoin paying campaign and not the shit spreading bounties in this forum. Besides you all need to stop doing this shittoken bounties because none of them are going to be worth anything and you would very well keep on holding them for years before they get listed on any decent exchange. Frustration at its peak, once you get into the cycle. Better to not participate in them.

More or less if you are not following the bounty rules you should not be entitled to any prize. So your line of though it flawed.

The right thing to do is to "owned no man his wages" The people promoting bounties has spent time and thinking in other to be able to post quality posts that bring icos or any projects into public domain and it is common sense to reward them and not deny them for changing to another project they think will reward them midway.
I have participated in about four bounties and experienced this treatment. We also hard about a campaign that runs here last month (anyone) and the developer refused to pay those that participated in the campaign and removed their signature.

very appropriate if you do not receive a gift because all the consequences and rules are clear on the gift of the site you are following, if you remove the signature, you can notify the management of the gift you are following by telegram or other communication

Gift? you mean to say that it's the bounty or reward correct? understand the importance of knowing the rules of the bounty that you are about to join. And if you joined without understanding the rules of the bounty, it's your problem.

Even notifying them won't help unless it's stated that they have the right to do so whenever a participant removed their signature. Pleading them won't especially if they are strict with their rules.

Put yourselves in the shoes of the campaign manager. Would you like it if the guys carrying your signature switched to your signature when you were counting, and then switched off when you weren't? Rules are simple and most people know how to follow them. Why is it so important for a few people to ask for exceptions?

Rules should really be strictly followed and its been stated before the campaign start.If its been said to equip signature until the end the campaign then you should follow it.

Decision would vary with the manager if he would consider out to count stakes for those who leave and plan to join other campaigns but most of the time the dont really grant such request.

You can also put yourself in bounty hunter's side. Will you accept if all of your stakes before (many weeks) got removed only because you changed or joined on other bounty? Sometimes there was no rules like that and it just implemented after ICO ends, which isn't fair.

You can say that because you are being paid with bitcoin on your campaign now, can you remove that and join on bounty altcoin campaign now?
I know the feel because i've used join on altcoin campaign too before.

Bounty managers  should do thier job when the campaign has ended not that it will take 2 weeks before they update the spreadsheet and when they see a hunter removes the signature they will disqualify it and remove all his stakes which is not right.

The part of owing no man no wages which was not practices by some bounty campaign manager cause a bounty participant remove sign code or move to another simply show the level incompetent of bounty manager which does such and I will advise people not participate in future bounty or campaign posted by such manager.

I love this statement (The right thing to do is to "owed no man his wages" )
 ;D

Bounty hunters who have been jumping from one bounty to another bounty thinks of it as unfair rule. But they have to respect the rules of that bounty and if they don't like it, very simple and the answer is by not joining from the start.

Yes, I've said this too if the manager is very considerate they are lucky if they found a manager that has that attitude.

if it was against the rules of champagne so I think it's fair  any way almost every bounty here will end up with no payment or a scam

Champagne huh? Do you need vodka, dude?

---

Ended with no payment and scam are different case. You can't say removal the sig means same with getting scammed. If the rules was posted about don't remove the sig until the campaign end, it means you shouldn't remove or you will ended disqualified for receive the reward/payment. While getting scammed mean, you already do all the work according the rules until the end of campaign, but you didn't get any payment or the bounty has been reduced wuthout any explanation

There are a few campaigns allowing people to remove the signature in the condition of telling the bounty manager before doing this, but most campaigns don't allow this, and ask participants to keep wearing the signature until the end of the bounty. It is up to the participant, if he is not comfortable with this rules, he can simply avoid participating.

that is if the manager will agree but some manager wont allow it  .  there are still bounties that do weekly countings , and its okay to remove your sigs as soon as the week has passed because you will be qualified for the stakes or payment  .

yes . at the end the decision is still on the participant because that is his life and no one can control him . he can leave or stay any time at his own discretion .

Depends on the rules and person who is managing campaign, sometimes you can talk to bounty manager and leave campaign and you will receive reward and sometimes they will remove all your reward if you do so. It shouldn't get you disqualified but if it does there is nothing you can do about it. Better approach is to join campaign at late stage, few weeks before it ends, don't join campaigns if it will last for several months and if you are not one hundred percent sure you will get tokens.
If you work for a month and then you quit your job, would you consider it fair if your employer does not pay you for work you have done that month?

They should first check the spreadsheet if the manager is  finished counting the stakes, maybe is it okay to remove signature without asking the bounty manager once the spreadsheet has been finalized.

That is the rule in the first place, if you don't want to follow it then stay away with that campaign, simply as that.


Again, there are rules in joining a bounty campaign, that's why we have this rule. Some managers though are very lenient, if you PM them in advance then probably you can still get your stakes. Others have a 4 week rule, you need to stay at least 4 weeks before you can get your bounty. So I don't think it's unfair, why are you leaving the campaign in the first place?  If your remove the signature prior to the end of the campaign then you forfeit everything here.

The reason? They do leave because they do see much better gold mine that on the previous one.Most bounty hunters doesn't read up rules on the first place that's why
when they don't able to get stakes they do normally complain and not even realizing that they are the ones whose wrong into this situation.Its been clearly stated that you wont get any stakes if you leave out the campaign but there are some managers that do consider out on giving stakes even if you do leave.Its just a matter of explanation or some sort of negotitiation between participants and the manager.They aren't that hard to convince if you do really need to transfer from other bounties.Just explain everything and if they do consider it out then your lucky but if not then you should call it a day.

Any of the bounty hunters that will encounter that, of course it 100% it is unfair for the participants.
But if you ask permission to the BM of the projects campaign to remove you're signature and avatar, then the
BM reply to your permission, I think your stakes will be safe if the BM allow you to do so, but if not it will be forfeit.

You wont really have any choice but to deal on what would be the decision of the bounty manager regarding on leaving out the campaign.
If he's a good one then he might consider out but if not then you should deal with it on having no stakes on the work you had done for the project.
A common thing actually on most bounty hunters that's why its much better to finish it until the end so effort wont be wasted.

That is exactly my point, they find something new with supposedly "good" pay, removed their signatures without any explanation to the previous manager and then they expect something in return? That's not how a business run here, if you don't read the rules of the campaign then I'm so sorry bounty hunters are at fault here and there's no need to bitch around and complain that they have been short changes here. And obviously if the previous manager saw that you remove the signature when counting the previous weeks stakes and seeing that you didn't even bother to PM him/her then I don't see you getting the stakes unless you are lucky, but rules is rules, IMHO.

Yes it is very unfair, in the case you mentioned above, it is very clear that bounty hunters will be very disadvantaged. Moreover, the results that have been collected for weeks just disappear.
But in cases like this we can't fully blame the bounty manager, because every bounty campaign has different rules for every bounty hunter who wants to participate, and the rules are clearly written on the first page of the bounty.
So in my opinion, in cases like this the bounty manager provides tolerance or a little policy so that no party feels disadvantaged.

I think making participants that have promoted the project for like 50% of the bounty duration should be allowed to take off their signature. Just my opinion though.

it will be better and clear if they ask the bounty manager if they are allowed to remove thier signatures and it wont cost any trouble on both parties.

If the rules indicate that, then it's fine. Here's a bounty with a similar rule and I hope some other bounty manager can adapt such rule into the campaigns they will manage in the future.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5182388.0 campaign is managed by Arteezy

Yeah, exactly. If the rules state right from the beginning what will happen with your stakes when you leave campaing early I am totally fine with it. Even when you then lose your stakes if you remove your signature. But then they should also provide a fixed date when the bounty will end. This way I can decide before joining if I wanna keep the signature that long. And if they extend the campaign afterwards everyone should be free to remove the signature/leave the campaign without any penalty.

Rules is rules and must really be followed most of the time but there are situations that manager can change it up and might consider on adding some stakes.

It will vary on how you do explain to him on the most polite way.If they got convinced then you did well because you are hitting 2 projects in one go without
minding too much if you wont actually paid.Lastly, why would care too much if majority of projects becomes shit anyway? ;D

Sometimes there's no need to ask the manager because everything that you need to know is in the rules unless you dont understand it or you want a clarification.

If you cant follow the rules then dont join.

We all know the biggest reason why people join on bounty is to earn some money. If they find and get accepted in other bounty which pay them higher than their current bounty, 99% they will leave it. And back then, there is no any rule about without getting stake or your stake will be removed if you join on other bounty.

I never enroll in this kind of campaign, it's unfair for bounty hunter, but there are bounty managers that cheats their participants from weekly stakes they make it disqualification from stakes from removing the signature, so you will be forced to wear the signature for the whole duration of the campaign.

It's much better to join a short campaign, so you can wear it on the whole campaign

If that is the rule from the start of the campaign, then it's your fault if you remove the signature, but if there is no mention from the start of the campaign that removing the signature will remove from all your stakes, then it's really unfair.
This is the reason why I never join a long campaign when I was still active in ICO bounty campaign, they can change the rule, so it's better to join short duration campaign.

You should understand that every campaign has a set of rules and they always state that they can change the rules anytime, it's unfair but this is their campaign and their project, if it's a long campaign, then look for a short one if you think the project is good to promote in a long term, then bear with it.

If the rules state that you should keep the signature at all time during the campaign, then we can't do anything on it, it looks unfair but this is their rule, their token and their campaign, just don't participate if you cannot keep going, or join a short term campaign like 4 weeks.

People who are participating in the bounties which has long campaign period to get rewards are literally stupids because even if the project is worth to do we are not going to anything valuable for few months even after the campaign completion because lot of works needed to get some value for that token so pick campaign with 8 or less weeks or don't just participate on the bounties.

It was indeed unfair and I was ready with the risk even though in the end I chose to never participate again in the bounty campaign. IMO, Because that decision would be better if we had agreed to the rules but finally we complained. Imagine, in the past I have long been a participant and the campaign has been finished but there are rules for not releasing the signature until the prize is credited. So the problem here is, when the campaign was over I decided to remove the signature because I was interested in participating in other campaigns, but still, even though I participated and wearing signature until the last week of the campaign but I didn't get any prize just because I removed the signature before the prize is credited.

That's annoying since the campaign already ended there's should some consideration from the manager, you completed the required weeks and it's only the extended time for calculations when you removed the signature codes, you can try communicating with the manager and state your case. Though if there's really a set of rules in regards to this matter and it's clearly stated from the start but it should  discuss from the manger and know how to workout with your case.
 

With some shady managers out there then the word "consideration" isn't on their vocabulary knowing that wasted stakes or extra tokens would be credited to them that's why
any violations or that doesn't able to comply with the rules even with the slightest error would really face up the consequences.Unless, if the team itself do able to check the spreadsheet and saw that you haven't wear the signature then they do have the right to do such action since they already announced that it should be wear until they do pay up.
If you do join up other campaign and you are pretty aware on that certain rule then the mistake was on yours and yes it do sucks but rules is rules which should be followed.

It's really unfair but they are the one that is setting the rules and we are just here to follow it if you are not comfortable wearing the signature in the duration of the campaign, nobody's forcing you to join, I will not laso join that kind of campaign and with these kinds of rules, I doubt if many signature bounty hunters will join the campaign, I think only few campaign are implementing this.

You are right, there's no participants that will be joining without accepting the rules and willing to work with the entire durations of the campaign periods. Most of them are trusting either the team or the campaign manager who's holding the job, if such rules being implemented the only thing that participants needed to do is to follow and keep the code, and wait for further announcement when the campaign manager's done counting the stake.

Its your due diligence you should have read the rules first before you wear signature of particular campaign. If the campaign is not yet ended but you had removed your signature already you should have asked permission or acknowledged that you have stopped the campaign even its not require just to pay respect for the bounty managers. No rules are perfect.

I think that it depends on the campaign that you are currently in.

If the rule was in place before you even signed up, then it's nothing unfair. Every single campaign manager can set their own terms, and it's up to the people providing the service to decide whether or not these terms are favourable to them or not.

If they only changed the rules after you removed your signature, then it may be shady. Especially if they haven't mentioned of this rule previously, they should at least pay on a pro-rata basis.

Every campaign have it's own rules that's why you should read the rules before joining on campaigns so that you won't get annoyed if the campaign manager imposed there rules and also I suggest that if you are in a signature finish it since sometimes leaving on campaigns without prior notice can give bad impact to your account since some other managers will mark you and they will not let you join on there camps on next time around especially if they have a btc paying campaign.

and also dont forget before removing the signature code ask the manager if you are able to remove it, wait for the reply in that case you will not be remove in that particular campaign. Other participants do not know that manager also needs some time to calculate all stakes before they are able to remove it.

It really is unfair, it's wasted effort in the part of bounty hunters and there should not be this kind of rules, but each campaign has their own set of rules, if they have then it's better that you not participate or as the bounty manager to change the rule, majority of the bounty hunters will not like this kind of rules, bounty hunters that has this kind of rules seldom attract bounty hunters in the signature campaign.

It's true, it's not fair for those who work for weeks. But these rules will still apply so that all participants can better support the project to completion. In my opinion, there are a number of campaign managers who give participants to their signature campaigns the opportunity to remove their signatures but must be reported in advance. Without reporting, all bets will also be deleted. I think this is fair enough for participants.

I think as long as hunters can inform the bounty manager of their intention to leave campaign it should be okey to keep your stakes or not to get disqualified,
But I don't it is right for hunters to just work away from a campaign just like that without given prior notice, such actions can warrant disqualification, this things should work both ways.

Work for weeks on some shitcoin project? Nah, those guys should know better what t promote and what not to. They are a part of this forum and they need to know the things that go on the forum. Otherwise they are just being selfish.

Depends on individual projects as per the decision of the team. Most of the time when the funding for the project is going badly you will see such measures of forcing people to wear signatures. You can get the hint that the project would not be able to reach a good cap and so its better to exit and consider the money you expected to get as lost. Those tokens anyway are worthless so dont waste time on them but develop your own skills and go for bitcoin payment campaigns.

From my perpective it is to prevent people who want to join and out from campaign. I think there are some people who join in 2 signature campaign and i think managers only want people to be serious join project that they handle. But if people think it is unfair, just pick project that the manager said can remove as long tell them first to keep the stake, in past Sylon did it.

Most managers do really have this kind of mindset where they do mind up on accepting projects without having any strict criterias on which one should really be supposed to be accepted and which is not.Due to greed and the thirst of community handling for the sake of getting some shit tokens they do accept without minding the possibilities of scam and fraud.Even they do tagged up theirselves on not getting paid on all the work that have been done specially if the project team do deal out with shit tokens payout for someone who do manage but if its on btc and other top alts then i shall say that they are too greedy without minding others situation.

why you said it's not fair? as you can see usually that rules already there before you join it
so it will be good if you not join it at first and just choose another bounty

No this is unfair.
Most of the bounty programs won't mention this rule in their thread. But when users want to leave the campaign in the middle, they will impose this rule. You can't permanently stick to a campaign which won't end after a certain period of time. I have seen some campaigns which are running for almost a year. Do you still think it's a good idea to stick into these type of campaigns?

i rarely see any bounty program that don't mention this rules in their thread.
In that case why you not join the bounty at the last month and join another bounty before that

There are bounty managers and campaigns that have the rules on leaving the campaign since the start and some are just adding it right in the middle period of the campaign, it the latter is the case then we shouldn't join any bounty of that type as we never know if there will be extensions on the campaign which lots of project do

I've checked many altcoin bounty programs. None of them mentioned this rule in their thread. But I'm sure most of them will impose this at the end.

That's what I told earlier. It is such a disgrace to see this rule added suddenly in middle of the campaign.

That rule is often included in most bounty campaigns where they wrote "all signature code must be kept on throughout the campaign period and removal of the signature will result to disqualification without payment",  but I think any bounty that is more than a month long can always give opportunity for those who intends to leave to do so provided they have given a prior notice to the bm, this shouldn't be a problem or reason to lose months of hard work over, bm should be more understanding in this aspect.

Dude this is one of unofficial rule you can find in all the signature campaigns as well as in bounty campaigns. Is that this discussion is under that much low level.
I hope we might not be created this thread to discuss it. Simple pm answer from the manager will be enough for it.

So far every bounty I participated had rule about it and I don't recall that any bounty which didn't let me leave if rule about leaving wasn't there.
Don't do long term campaigns, stay some time but not too long, manage your time better and join each month different campaign.

If you see this rule or if this rule is mentioned before then it's not a problem at all. Users will join by accepting these terms.
We don't know how long will the campaign last. Most of the bounty programs won't mention this. You can't join a new campaign every month in case of signature campaigns.

This situation varies from person to person. When you accept a bounty, you must stick to the end. If you quit halfway, you can only blame the initial decision.

yes agree with you, when you think its not fair you havenot to join and choose another bounty . all requirement   of signature campaigns is like that so you have to follow the rule and waiting for end of campaign to get reward
its look hard but requirement   have to do, if not you have unfair in your life

I think campaign manager should consider this rule. and allow users to leave the campaign if they want to after finishing the running week..

I think he's just saying a general thing. not complaining about a specific campaign. its same with almost every campaign. and he's right. campaign managers should not force this rule from beginning.

If you have worked more than 10 weeks of the campaign and removed the signature because you joined another campaign its really just gonna turn the hard work to waste and I hope the bounty manager consider counting stakes. For me, joining a campaign that would take 20 weeks is a tiring campaign, this is when bounty manager has to have a voice when they extend another weeks for the campaign. 20 weeks is a sign of scam.

but it's their campaign rules so he can do that but i think the user itself must read it before joining
because there is a few campaigns that not force this rules

The manager should at least be considerate for saving the stakes, like working for months hence bounty hunters could not assure if they even get a decent value for their token.

Anyway, OP created this thread last August so perhaps he even got over by this or at least get back here if he got anything from the bounty.

How long the campaign doesn't guarantee you will get paid though. Even if you joined in a campaign which running only for 1 week, there is also no guarantee you will get paid. Just make sure don't join in a bounty where they offered huge bounty and also don't want to use escrow for their bounty

Every campaign has their own rules, if you find it unfair, just try not to join even if the reward is too attractive, everyone live by the rules man but the campaign has the advantage as they will put they have the right to change the rules.