Bitcoin Forum

Few good projects i have seen are having hard time to gather funds, they are still far behind to reaching their target softcap
1. Bitwings
2. EZ365

What do you have in mind about these two project? they are good enough to give a try for me, what do you say?

Both projects are indeed good, and I have participated in the Bitwings project in the last week but were not rewarded, if the EZ365 project was also good, and those who followed it were also busy, only I did not participate in the EZ365 project because I prefer other projects.

Softcap means an initial fund that is needed to develop the project. Without the fund, the project will not be able to walk further. I do not recommend you to invest in it because if they failed to meet the softcap, in most cases the company will be forced to close their project and refund their investor money.
About Bitwings, even though the project looks promising but I do not have confidence in their smartphone.
I know nothing about EZ365.

EZ365 looks a good project to me, they are in partnership to top companies, and they are real people you can check their homepage
https://www.ez365.io , some of their developers had a photo op with Mcafee and they also held a lot of webinars and conferences, they are active online and offline as well, all the things you are looking on a project are all here, you can invest but only invest what you can afford to lose.

I have only heard about Bitwings. I did not even take the effort to know more about the project. I only stumbled upon it many times in my social media accounts. Their marketing is pretty active and gives off good impression. I don't know about EZ365 or perhaps nothing remained in my memory the moment I passed by their ads. What I am pretty sure of when projects such as these two failed to even get the soft cap is that they are not doing enough or that their projects are not enough.

It doesnt matter any more if the project is good or bad since even good project  might be  failed .  ICO project only care from the start when they need investors but after they success to raised fund they already forget what is the real plan .Many investors now are learning and affraid to invest any more in any ICO ,that's why more of them is hard to get the hardcap .

Even though I do not have an idea about the other one, but I heard about bitwings. But I doubt about how real this product is. As I remember, a phone with the same name will be made that it will be possible to mine 2 ETHs for a month. Maybe I am wrong, maybe somebody can convince me. Or I just need to wait to get the answer.

If you are looking for good project, check out this one: https://www.cere.network

I studied the Bitwings project and I think that their idea is very good because now phones with cryptocurrency mining are already entering the market and definitely very soon there will be more of them. But I don’t understand why they have problems with collecting money.

Face value is what we need now, if you are going to develop projects now, you need good actors and influencers. The best thing to hire are those who are hot topic today with good background, actor and artist or even famous entrepreneurs around the world can make a difference. Aside from that, the time it was created, you need timing, in the current situation it most likely will fail as there are still bad image in the altcoins sections, scams etc you name it.

Reaching a softcap is one the most important phase of fundraising, not reaching it will be hard for the projects to proceed. I heard about Bitwings before but it seems too good to be true to mine 2 ETH per month on a mobile device I don't know how would that be possible but I think they already have investors judgement.

As per my investigation on ez365 i belief that the project is real and the project has good teams and CEO as well, they are in partnerships with top companies as well so i belief they will reach softcap easily with time, as for bitwings many are saying its impossible to earn ETH reward on their smartphone, kinda make me worry as well but wings company has been around since years back that is why i took the risk, lets wait and see how things go

Bitwings 2ETH per month sounds too good to be real for most people but the teams claim that its based on POD (Proof Of Data), something i have never seen in action, maybe its possible? i don't know but one thing makes this reasonable, the cost of the smartphone and the cost of the mining contract, you need to check that out because its very costly, enough to build a rig in my country, the contract that gives 2 ETH PER MONTH costs is upto the cost of the smartphone, do your research very well people

Bitwing is a good project and has received full appreciation in the country in Malta. Bitwings aims to offer smartphones with futuristic technology to all its customers at competitive telephone rates and crypto data transmission. ICO starts on 2 January 2019 and ends on 30 November 2019. So ICO will soon end. ICO revenue is unknown. But I see can achieve the target, because innovation is very useful and good for the future.

The bitwings are quite an interesting project due to the fact that this is a novelty in the crypto market.

There were no working projects with mobile mining capable of worthily realizing their idea. Personally, I do not believe that mobile mining can be profitable, because mobile phones have completely different capabilities.
However, technology does not stand still, let's see how the project will cope with its task. Alas, I did not find any fees on any of the sites, maybe they really go bad.

Bitwings are quite promising with Minephone as the main product, enough to form a unique niche. However, with the support exchange that has not been maximized, I think it makes the demand less, making it difficult to reach a soft cap. If the Bitwings team cooperates with other exchanges that are more profitable, it will surely become a booster that can attract more investors so that the market capacity formed is better.
I don't know much about EZ365, only a few times have seen it from the signature.

Bitwings does IEO on the p2pb2b exchange but I don't know whether IEO is successful or not because I'm not sure if IEO on p2pb2b will reach the target, but I see Bitwings continuing to do marketing everywhere, and offering their smartphone products so I think Bitwings will continue to grow.

as one with returns of work from the ico scheme helps as developer gains with supports of funding on covering expense with scheme on work with terms of exhibition,
the projects might be with one as fine to delivered within the terms of reference as uses with initials on predefined of drafts on projects plan.

Bitwings is indeed a good company. before jumping into crypto, they have already seen their credibility. But their project idea is not too new because it is still focused on security and privacy which there are many coins that offer it. But what makes me interested is their smartphone that can mine BWN which can produce 2 eth in a month. Ez365 is the same, not a new idea. But at least they try to educate users about crypto. Good project. Maybe that's all I can say.

Although they are good project if they don't market their project well, they don't invest their own fund, the team are not that too active in the community, no development, no regulations, no clear roadmap, then, how can people trust them, there's a lot  of project out there, they don't even have bounty campaigns, and didn't do ICO/IEO still they manage to search for private investors.

There are many good projects besides the two projects that you have mentioned, but investor interest like this is slightly reduced because altcoin seems to be in state that is not improving at this time. And surely there is also intense competition to get funds in accordance with their sales targets

Being a good project with good credibility is not enough when it comes to crowd funding from the masses more specifically in crypto market building up the hype is also a deciding factor whether a project could succeed or not in the future because lacking the hype will definitely drive down the amount of funds that can be gathered thus failed reaching the soft cap.

However a good project or not it is kinda subjective though. The project you mentioned might sounds good in your ear but may be not for other people.

You should maybe take a look at those IEO project that have pretty much ordinary idea but selling like a hot cake.

So much irony here, simple and accurate analyzation, if these two are indeed a "good" project, they should've been reached or exceeded their target funds already, but they still don't, therefore I guess it is safe to say that these two are not good, sorry to say that.


About this, they could easily fake this whole thing by paying those top companies you have mentioned to promote their project as a way of marketing their self to attract investors and bounty hunters, too classic.

Many good projects that raise funds through the sale of tokens/ coins cannot or are difficult to achieve the minimum funding target or softcap. I think this is because investors are not currently too interested in new projects even though they are in the good category and have the potential for success. However, that is the current situation which has befallen many projects, only a few have actually managed to raise funds.
There are still many other reasons that ICO or IEO investors might consider. My assumption in this situation is the impact of low investor confidence in new projects where many of them have been deceived by investing in projects that cannot reach expectations.

how you know if they are good project? kidding.
im sure if some part of project is good, but the problem is when gathering fund/investor. some investor sometime wring when decide their project, and its decrease chance for good project to build up and developing their path. and many reason, why investor dont believe or invest directly to ico now.

I have no idea about these two project. Well as you stated, they are good but I suggest you to look for another one who more seem working than this two. It is not that I have no trust with Bitwings and EZ365 but if they not reached their target softcap they maybe are going not to continue the project anymore, and remember it is their softcap as of now they are still far from success. Their are still many blocks that needs to be finished.

End of 2017 was a doomsday for ICOs and people have certainly lost interest in investing in ICOs, IEOs, STOs etc...
The only thing we as an investor can do is wait for the project to reach the soft cap and start developing the project.
Once the product is developed and released in the market after that we should invest in it.
I know we will lose a major amount of profits but the risk would certainly be decreased a lot.

good or bad the project I think will be balanced with the income owned, if I blame the state of the market trends I think does not make sense either. if a project is established when a bad trend means they already have a way to handle it. so I don't think there are any good projects that don't achieve softcap

holy crap Bitwings, that just sounds like a scam off the bat from the description : / ANY project that promises it "has 100% guaranteed value" run away from and never look back haha
Wings itself was a scam tho imo, they took in so much money and just did nothing but wait and copy w.e others like waves did, for years now... lol
EX365 looks fucked too imo, whats with all the old white men on the team? very sketchy imo haha

I believe that both of these projects are promising, but most of all I would highlight Bitwings so far. I liked it because of the availability of its product, which may well be in demand. I hope that I can buy a smartphone from them for ETH mining, but I can only do this next year. I won’t say much about EZ365 yet, as I continue to study it, but it looks pretty good against other projects.

If truly they are good projects, hitting softcap won't be an issue in most cases. I believe they lack strategy or maybe still doing ICO rather than IEO on reputable exchanges.  Nowadays investors are very skeptical before delving into any token sale, and by the way what made you say Bitwings and EZ365 are good projects, some points to back your claims up could have been cool.

I heard about Bitwings from my friend and it seemed interesting to me. I like the idea of ​​this project, but I think that people do not need it. In my opinion, this is why this project will not be successful.

You get it all wrong about bitwings, the 100% guaranteed value is only on their own very offline and online stores not on exchanges sir, do not judge projects that you know too little about, what many lacks is the patience of doing research

They're both completely trash, hence why they haven't met their funding goals.

Projects that actually stand out and are likely to have real world applications are quickly funded by venture capitalists and institutional money.

Since these haven't been scouted by these firms, it pretty much reaffirms the statement that they have no long-term potential.

What makes you believe that this project are good and deserves investors money, any particular reason for your thoughts?
Anyways,  we all know the current situation with ico's this days,  if any project wants generate any meaning funds, then Ieo is their only option, i don't know the source of funding attempted  by this 2 project but i think ieo is the only way to guarantee success when it comes fund raising.

I took part in those bounty programmes and I believe that those two were definitely the best bounties/projects that were published on this forum during the last several months. They should launch an IEO on a big exchange to collect more funds. Bitwings did their IEO on P2PB2B, it is not serious.

When the complete market is down we cannot expect anything to grow or receive the big value for the investment we do with new ICO. Sometime if they have big investors or big VC. They may sustain for the long term and can earn more money.
Then investors will working hard to prove with project hence they can reach the soft and hard cap easily.

Apparently you are still wearing the signature code of one of the project so I don't know why you are referring to it like it ended months ago, EZ365 is still running according to your signature in case you forgot,

If this project don't reach softcap is because the investors don't see them worthy enough, real solid project don't waste time reaching softcap, take GRAM as an example, look at the amount raised inspite of the harsh market condition, this is the kind of project investors wants to put their money this days.

not only these two there are lots of solid project facing hard times to reach soft cap.crypto market is really bad and its killing ico and IEO.people scare to lose the money

Nowadays crypto investors are very skeptic with new projects so the team owners should have a better marketing strategies to attract the interest of this investor in able to achieve their minimum funding goal. Raising fund these days have changed a lot, not like the ICO era before wherein a project can start collecting funds with a small capital because now as a start-up they must have a big budget to do a marketing push like doing a multiple IEO at the same time or having press releases in popular crypto related sites.

Bitwings seems very good but they have such a shit management team! If they run their IEO sale for years, they won't reach their soft cap! Because they choose P2bpb2b exchange for their IEO! Such a worst decision it is? I tried to tell them to go for Bitforex if you can't bear kucoin or Binance! But every time they deleted my messages! This project will be failed if they don't move the IEO from that shit exchange!

The crypto market is not that bad at this moment. There is no good ICO, that's right! But good IEO can be successful easily if the project goes for a good exchange's IEO! Without a good exchange, no one will invest in your project's IEO to lose their hard-earned money!

Smartphone projects and exchange projects, both projects are good and Bitwings also guarantees the price of the token remains stable if you want to buy a smartphone even though the price of the token is down.
they have had several meetings, actually, it's a matter of time, we can see there will be competition from new smartphones in the future, like Samsung and other famous smartphones

I heard about Bitwings but never paid close attention, could be that I didn't take it serious. However, any project finding it hard to reach softcap shows something is wrong somewhere. This is because, softcap is the minimum funds needed to kick-start the project and without such the team will shut down project. Therefore if these projects are yet to meet softcap I won't invest in them, cus I won't trust them (this is my opinion).

I think in such slow and sluggish ico market which we are seeing nowadays from past 12 to 18 months especially, there is high need that good quality projects need to find seed/angel investor that can invest enough that helps the peoject to start development and do not worry about soft cap because raising good funds in the current market is a very hard task.

Bitwings idea is more promising to me, 2Eth in one month by smartphone. Although I was a bounty hunter of round 1 bitwings campaign. But EZ365 project idea isn't so good but still interesting to me. Looking for interesting project check Swapzilla.

I participated as hunter in Bitwings project . The fundamentals of the project was quite impressive and team was coming up with good updates. We all know if a project struggles to reach softcap is not a good signal and a lot of investors will definitely loose confidence in that kind of project. So I would advise don't invest in Bitwings. But if you had already invested,  then pray for a miracle to happen.

Many projects right now are suffering and the market is becoming dull. It is anticlimactic because I thought the last quarter will raise the demand because it will be holiday season soon. Yet, it is becoming more difficult to attract investors that might be due to the fact that many scams and project failure happened lately. There are a lot of good projects but they are getting set aside because of the bad PR in the market.

I don't know if people are still into crowd funding right now, but based on what I noticed, when the market struggles, people will stay away for awhile.
Their timing is not really good, maybe they could extend the sale if they haven't reach their soft cap yet because good projects deserves to stay and to grow in this market.

If truly they are good projects, I think they should work on their marketing and also improve their strategies. For instance, they can sort more good project backings or run an IEO on a reputable exchange if possible. Hope they are not doing ICO, because investors are so skeptical about that pattern of token sale presently.

Bitwings and EZ365 both ICO project still not reached hard cap although have pass many phase for ICO selling, right now very difficult looking for with new ICOs investing can raise with soft cap and hard cap. Many ICOs always raise under 50% for ICO selling and they continue with listing on exchange market for IEO time, investor dislike with long time moment for investing with ICOs.

or better yet if they really do have solid foundation and good business model, they can always look for private funding.
those private investors can be convinced if they have real capability to deliver those objectives. and they will know it.
crowdsourcing is not a thing anymore, very few can make it. they need to look for other funding options. should not rely from the community. that is if they strongly believe that their project can make a difference.

These are all good projects but reaching a soft cap is not easy these days. With the cryptocurrency market not performing well not many people are interested in new projects. If you look at the 2017/2018 ICO era you see the cryptocurrency market was booming so that was the time many people are investing in new projects. 

These two projects are supposed to intensify more on their marketing. That is what they need to raise the initial fund, which is the soft cap and it can help with achieving the hardcap as well.
They have to work in such a way that investors can trust them with their funds. Also, they can approach whales in the crypto space, perhaps to invest in their private sales. These ones alone can help to achieve the soft cap.

In my opinion both projects are good, but due to the current poor ICO / IEO market conditions, the two projects have not reached the target. If the two projects were launched last year, I think both of these projects will reach the hardcap target but current market conditions are quite difficult for new projects

if they are already walking in the middle of the road and they have difficulty getting what they have targeted, it is likely that their project was not very attractive at the beginning of the launch, and to achieve it all is indeed difficult. unless they change direction, my intention is to innovate new projects to make investors interested in helping fund their projects.

Even if their projects are good it doesn't mean that they are good enough to try because they lack something which is very important in launching a project which is marketing techniques. Even shit projects were able to reach their softcap because they focus more on marketing techniques like how they can reach the investors and supporters.

If they are not capable for it then they are not worthy of our hard earn money to fund their project development but if you like to try your luck then it's up to you.

from where you can judge the project is good, is it just by looking at the road map or project promises that say they are different from the others? too many projects with false promises at the moment and it's hard to judge projects that are really good (real)

it is not recommended to join project not able to reach soft cap, this mean the project may close at any time, even the project is good it is not grantee it can success   

I have not heard of those projects before but even if those projects are any good investors are not interested in new projects anymore, put yourself in their shoes investors have been losing money with new coins for two years in a row and the success stories are getting more rare by the day, and even if they wanted to invest in those projects how many of them still have the money to do it? It is better for the majority of the icos to admit defeat, the age of icos in this market has ended.

if Bitwings cannot meet this softcap it will be very unfortunate, will they return investor funds if they fail to reach softcap ?,
Bitwings should be able to launch their IEO on several large volume exchanges other than P2PB2B

Reaching Softcap was the main goal to build their project. Think if they have no funds whether they can build innovation, pay their team or workers, listings on market exchanges and other necessities.
Their project looks good, but if it doesn't get enough funds they'll struggle to build their own project and end the project shut down.

I see Bitwings project and  EZ365 real their team and work hard to create a successful project ez365 exchange project has lasted nearly five months and will be completed next month ICO is quite interested in the project ez365 I want to join their bounty program if there is time to join.

They are very good projects,  and one can participate.  All the same, dont forget all the basic rules of investing, most importantly,  dont be greedy.

It still depends on the persistence of the developer there are projects that did not reach the softcap only half of it, but the developer is persistent to push through with the project, and some projects had private investors on their projects, so even if the project did not reach the softcap, there are still chances that the dev will continue it.

I suggest that projects should look for more means to raise funds than depending solely on individual investors to to participate in the project alone. If the projects are really good, they should be able to attract institution to invest in them and not just hoping on common investors.

Ez365 fundraising is not ending anytime soon, we still have over 8weeks left so thats until january 2020, i heard they are going to malta submit today? well there is a chance that more investors will be interested, i personally like the project and the teams

Bitwings IEO was on EXmarket as well not p2p2b2 only but now you can buy only on their website using ETH,BTC,wire transfer, i am surprised they are not using exchange like okex or gate because they have the money already since the company has been in business for long

The investor's definition of good project is different nowadays than the time when ICO was first to introduce. They are now taking the precaution of investing their money just because of someone this and that is a good project. When you read the history of the good project from the last year till now neither of them reached their hard cap. Most of the investors only find that out they really are good projects after they are done with their sales and when they are listed on some exchanges. like for example Howdoo, Mb8coins, and others.

Nowadays, since the market is so bearish its difficult to find a project which can be supported of many here in crypto community. As time goes by many projects were failed because of those investors have doubts due to the scammers here. On the two project said above, I only heard on bitwings but in some point the team must double their effort due to the reasons just to reach even as softcap and eventually everything will be follows.

in your opinion is good but not necessarily according to investors because everyone must have their respective views in determining the project. good project but did not achieve softcap maybe because they lacked marketing and didn't attend many blockchain events

EZ365 is an exchange and will probably have a good platform later. You know how good centralized exchange and they are rarely been zero compared to other projects. I'm not familiar with Bitwings, but I often support project with already working products like agareum which is focusing on games. The game is LIVE by the way, and the team is so approachable regarding its modification and improvement. Better for you to check out.

I never said they failed to reach softcap but still not able to reach softcap at this point in time, the presale is still ongoing and its not over yet, for now its too early to judge the projects when sales is not over yet

Indeed, these two projects do have huge potential to be a good crypto after the campaign period but I do think that it is no longer the projects, which are the problem. We saw so many projects which had high demand and large popularity but the outcome is the opposite of the investors' expectations. I think it is the market situation which is the problem at this moment. Investors are afraid to invest because of the continuous downfall we are seeing on the market value of cryptos.

Yes there are chunk of good projects which were failed or could not achieve the desired outcome thus failing both the development team as well as the investors wherein no one can be blamed due to gloomy market situation and there were few really good projects which were paused because of uncertainty and those projects might make a comeback if market situation gets suitable. 

Reaching softcap or hardcap is not a guarantee that a project will be around for a long time, some projects that have reached their hardcaps often turned scam exits.

I don't have much information about these 2 projects but generally, some good projects are not able to reach the softcap because they are often coming from inexperience developers; they are honest but lack the technicalities to promote their ico projects.

Still they should do our best for their project to reach their goals, if they really trust their work, no matter how hard to raise fund they will make it continue and they will have also invest their own fund for it. There's a lot of project out there who haven't reach even soft cap although they are legit, but still they are continuing and not stopping, they are looking for some ways for them to develop.

A lot of projects do really having a hard time to reach their softcap and hardcap because a lot of investors have stop participating and investing projects due to a lot of scams, that is why they have experienced losing a lot of money. It is the reason why a lot of projects didn't get their coins in the market because they didn't reach their goal.

If these projects were good enough to convince the investors to invest on their project then they may not be having hard time reaching their soft cap.Or people totally lose interest on investing on new projects due to shits happening for more than 2 years now.If you want to try then its more like a gamble to me since if they didn't reach their soft cap you wasted your money on investing those project which could be invested on somewhere more conservative and made few profits.

I am participating in EZ365 and so far it looks good. Team is dedicated and many new people joining their telegram group. About fund raising, in current market scenario its hard to raise funds for any new project due to decreasing number of investors. There were so many scam projects in the past and even good projects could not do well. This is the reason funds raising is an issue. EZ365 has extended its IEO till Jan 2020 perhaps they can attract more investors to fund their project. I do not know anything about Bitwings.

Without reaching hard cap once users sees the project to be potential and with good team they will definitely patronise it, despite bad market is covering limiting good projects but once there are good publicity and users tend to do research about it and boom its good they will buy it in the market once listed either free or not.

I think they often ask for too much money and get greedy. Especially when they go into the millions. You simply do not need that much and they being greedy. No wonder the cap is hard to reach. Good projects do struggle but that is because idiots support crap and lose their money and never come back again.

I agree with your opinion, because each investor has his own advisor and research, for now they are not carelessly investing. For the two projects mentioned op, I think they should be more extra in doing development, so that what they want is achieved.

I literally agree with you. If the project is good they have prepared some funds beforehand, don't come here with empty hands and only sell concepts that are full of sweet promises. Nowadays there are many projects like this, they only rely on investors' money to support their projects from the beginning until they end up being a scam. Investors should be better able to select good projects for their investments, projects with brilliant and good concepts may not necessarily be able to realize and bring good impact for supporters. Most of them have given up on facing a problem and ran away from their responsibilities.

What I know and I've followed is Bitwings. This is a good project. Biwings mobile has an innovation to develop hybrid smartphones and the FIRST Smartphones that extract up to 2 Eth / month. This project is ongoing and under development. This project really needs to get support, because this is an original project that has new innovations.

yes, the current project is very difficult to achieve, even just softcap. Why .? because investors have lost confidence about the crypto project, especially the ICO project. the current project does not provide new ideas, in general, the ideas used already exist in the projects that have been released. so if a new project doesn't have a different idea, then it won't have a chance to grow. even stopped only until the fundraising.

I know of bitwings, did a couple of promotions for them. To sad that they didnt reach softcap because truly looks legit and good. The last i heard it was traded using the contract address on forkdelta. Most times it takes great awareness through marketing to push a project to the next level.

As for EZ365 i have know idea how good they are, but i wish them all the best

i think ive heard this reason many times but i still think that this isnt the real reason behind not reaching the hard cap of an ico projects  . people dont loose confident if they knew that the project is legit and they will always invest on it because who would not love to earn big here  ? and ico can make that dreams come true when compare to investing on standard cryptos alone  . ico's are not new on the space and newer ideas are now being introduced here  .

It is not in general that investors lost their trust to these kinds of projects, it is due to the fact that the world of altcoin project development has just grown so vast, that these projects are being skipped by the investors 'unintentionally', or in other reasons, there are restrictions in their country that lead them to be unable to invest even if they want to. I can say, a very good project will still get investors no matter what happens as investors will make their way to grab the opportunity to invest.

These projects might just lack some aspects of why they are having a bit of a hard time in achieving their soft cap.

I agree with this view, and I witnessed that many good projects terminated their activities because they could not get enough investment.

Because the project is teamwork, although developers and engineers do their job well, marketers may not be doing their job very well.

That is why the staff in each wing of a project should be working well. It's unfortunate, but that's the truth.

Market conditions are pretty weird right now, projects reduce their hardcaps and softcaps because it is very hard right now to reach it, only top exchange IEO can help to reach hardcap, so give them advice about it.

Market conditions and investors mindset regarding to ico's most if not all are already unwilling to participate with any ico's making things harder for new project to get their soft/hard cap target. The team needs to bring more effort if they wanted to get the budget that they've need. IEO's can also be a good option if the team are willing to use their money for the listing from reputable exchange.it will add more exposure and interest from the investors.

I don't really follow the development of EZ365, but maybe for Bitwings it's pretty good. if not mistaken, Bitwings is a project that makes technology products such as PCs, or smartphones that can do mining. because of this, the product released has interesting hardware support and high technology. if this project has reached its softcap, it is a project that should be supported. I watched the bounty from Bitwings, but it seemed like it was finished. I just hope the projects that have products that can be the basis of the price of the token. unfortunately I don't have funds to invest  :'(

I think this will continue if there is still many ico fraud committed by developers, and the decline in revenue from the project is the effect of many ico fraud in 2018, so that investors' interest to invest in ico is much lower than before, it is truly regrettable if potential projects, and as good as bitwing could not achieve their sales targets, so the team was forced to stop the bounty project  faster because of limited funds obtained.

well ,
1. Bitwings : for me , its something new, i mean they can claim their smarphone can mining up 2 ETH/month , of course is totally profit it that true, but lets see later , for now i cant say its a bullshit, since no clear info about it.
2. EZ365 : well, athough we can see now they have a huge attention, have a good partner , high rating from ico website, but , actually they a fail project from last year, i forgot what project name before change it to EZ365, and now , they try their luck again to joining on ICO events, and i see they have a more features than before.

investors lose interest on project make more sense. no doubt why investor affraid to invest on project, bcz too many shit projects around here

in this case, people who thinks the project good may just a few, the most of people think that the project is so bad

so, there is no doubt if the project doesnt get much money to reach softcap

I think the project is good, considering the beautiful feedback from those who have participated

I would better suggest investing in Bitcoin and top-10 altcoins now. I think they will rise first when the bull run comes finally. Then the other altcoins will have chance to get pumped. And the last in this queue will be the new projects.

It is not only about greediness, but the market conditions also force the team for collecting as much as possible investment amount. The simple rule is to be able to pay the development funds for the next planned period otherwise the delayed roadmap is inevitable. Soft cap reached projects usually slowly climbs to higher points if they can survive under bear market conditions. Struggles are the salt of the receipt and each project crosses these choices.

Investors are shunning ICOs thus making it difficult for them to reach Soft cap because lot of scamming activities that engulfed the cryptoshere and the unfavorable market conditions had really discouraged potential investors to have a rethink, thus all eyes is on bitcoin now, gone are the days when ICOs easily reached both their Soft cap and hard Cap then ICOs with good project can easily be found while fraudulent ones are quite few.

I don't even believe if a small growth can be considered as a good point to buy a coin. Look at cryptorank and some ieos are still profitable right now but not a lot as ieo on the first launch. Bitcoin is a good choice to give more guarantee to our portfolios but remember it has the same risk when it comes down from top to the bottom price. Didn't you even think how much people are getting a big lost in bitcoin caused by the dump from above 13k rate to the below 8k rate?

What we needed is an accurate analyzation that can bring me to the a better condition to see where the price of coin will be going on in the future. Bitcoin is a less risk investment but sometimes it's also bring people to the big loss same like another altcoin too.
Small growth in a new coin can be created by the whale and we must consider if that was a manipulation or not. It's too risky to bet on a new coin based on the how much percentage of pump for that new coin.

Both project are good.
1. Bitwing with their strong product (ETH miner Phone) was a briliant idea in this market situation l.
2. EZ365, this is a very good project which is I choose as my signature. CEO are very active in all of blockchain event. Especially promote their project with many partner.

So again it depends on their marketing strategy.

I stopped following projects essentially because of the miserable state that they have since last year up to now. Although they look promising and offers good use case, this isn't the thing here anymore.
Investors concern now is more about the legitimacy and validity of the project.

What really made them good is the dollar million question. Is it because of the team, the idea within the project or what? These are what to be considered before saying a project is good. Also, there are many projects which people might think to be good but when studied carefully always shows the reverse is the case. For these two projects I came them but paid no attention because am not fully convinced that they will do well, now am not surprised they are finding it hard reaching softcap. Let's always try to look beyond and find the driving force within any project.

Many investor have return with ICO investment project with give bad promise and always delays after ICO ended, the ICO never during based on how schedule list on their road map from how many phase ICO sale until how long coin listing after ICO ended, they always give fake promise with their ICO although their project have raise hard cap and success for selling.

I want to research those two but there are a lot of things that needs to be done before I can finalize a summary.

I will just give you some advise.
If you really think you dug so deep about those two and find out they are not scams then go for it.
It will always be your choice and not people here.
They are just here to also give their opinions.
Now, at this time it is really difficult to reach a softcap, literally almost all ICOs are having that problem.
It would be wise to get involved with them and see thru it that they will do anything for the project to be a success.

maybe promotion on some well-known blogs and holding IEO on large volume exchanges makes directly reaching the softcap target might also reach hardcap and that might help

the new projects from our development stuiod has with the label set with the name of NOTASHION as helping non musician listener of musics to gains with correct information about songs they might wants to looks on folder with the server space on connection with the online access or as searching within the local computer space.

the project has with the valuation of 125M
as investors might with interest please supports.

Bitwings has real use case and of course working products, its an old company since 2007 and they have real stores in some part of the world, i expect more than just simple success from the project and many are already buying their smartphones

I don’t know about the second project, but the first Bitwings project is really good and I hope they will can collect at least softcap, but the problem is that this company conducted IEO on scam exchanges and of course this was the biggest mistake for this company, but I hope that Bitwings will can still achieve their goals.

Yes, both of these projects are quite potential, I am following the project EZ365, their advertising process is not good, so it is less interested by investors, partly because many investors are not interested in the beginning. But I believe the ability of them to collect enough softcap capital is within their reach.

I don't know anything about these projects, but I think you need to stick to a simple tactic. Invest after the project overcomes the soft cap.

investing after recruiting a softcap is a good idea.
True, problem still lies in how such projects get this softcap, because no one will carry money, because everyone is waiting for a softcap set..
Now you can’t do without it

Time and effort is the only thing that will be wasted in you. Well, try givin' it a shot though, who knows that such project might reach its softcap sooner or later. And besides project that are on the bottom rock sometimes bloom, no one knows, there is nothing wrong with that. However, there will be stuff that you'll be get wasted but atleast you tried, right?

I think it is one other way to at least secure and have a lesser risk, reaching soft cap is the first step to achieving success. If they can overcome it, the project is most likely be able to achieve more in the following days of its ico.

I also suggest to gather more information, naturally, an investment should come to your own analyzation, investor should at least know what he is about to invest.

Yes, many ICO didn't follow their road map after the surge of these projects. This made a lot of investors lost their confidence in it and if you're looking around asking people if it's still reliable to invest into ICOs.
Expect a negative answer into it because they don't want others to become associated with it anymore or experience the same bad outcome that others did before.

Sounds like a good idea but doesnt actually work. Ive seen so many project reaching soft cap but have no volume in exchange because they are already draining the demands for their coin in the softcap and people are not buying anymore through the exchanges. It is always those project that struggles to reach softcap and finally reach it with blood and sweat that usually have a hard time gaining big liquidity in the exchange. If you want to know a good project just find that is hyped. Atleast they got the community to support the liquidity.

The thing is - ICOs not working anymore, ICO hype gone with all new investors, even great team and technology cant make any value for successfull fundrising...Maybe it will return, maybe no. IEOs is not for fundrising, it is more about marketing promotion and payment for listing on big exchange.

I am afraid about majority of devs who are more concerned now about strategies involved to fool us into getting money from our pocket than the strategy they will use to get a very good project that they will release for future purpose and it is now clear to me that the people never even had any purpose for releasing the project other than the purpose of making money which is the profit to them.

The only way that I see right now of bad developers and bad ICO can leave the market is if we have an authority that would help establish an agency that will monitor the quality of some of these projects being released and so approve them for release or not, is if investors can only go for projects that has been certified by the government which we all know that it will be hard for any scammer to dare government regulated system.

First of all, the vast majority of the ICO projects nowadays are heavily over-priced. I have seen soft-caps of $50 million for projects which are yet to complete their first phase of development work. Now compare this with the Ethereum ICO in 2015, which had a hard cap of $18 million. Also, the market is not in a good state which makes it even more difficult for the ICOs to achieve their funding targets. 

A good projects but i think its not the average project that we are looking for. That bitwings is good for me but reaching the softcap is the problem if they didn't reach it. Nowadays ICO is not that trusted and the money was commonly used in IEO's on the exchanges to conduct a sale. So i think its hard for both of the project not unless they are in the top list of the ico advisors or researchers.

It still depends on the project outcome. I think those kinds of projects are just listing their coin in an unpopular exchange then let it run without being handled by the developer.
Finding a hyped project is not always becoming a successful project, most of the time those who have been hype are the scam projects.
I think it will be better to invest in popular coins or maybe invest when the project is already in the market.

For good projects to get fund easily its all in the teams hand, some make mistakes by taking their IEO to crappy exchanges with fake volumes, even if binance or huobi fee is too high what about others like kucoin? new project teams need to always try to consider highly rated exchanges instead of mediocre rated exchanges

In my opinion, if a good project definitely reaches a soft cap it can even be a hard cap. not possible if a good project with a promising concept does not reach a soft cap. they can certainly overcome it to achieve good goals.

This is a bad news especially for all bounty hunters that are involved in their bounty campaigns. Not for investors because they will probably see their money again.
By the way how much money do they really need to achieve soft cap? I can´t find this information on their website, also EZ365 did not specify on which crypto-exchange they run their IEO.

It sounds as if the quality of project these days are decided by the amount of funds been raised by the team. it is hard to figure out the main ideology behind these project. For Me, EZ365 Stands a better chance of been a good project than Bitwings. bitwing project halted their campaign due to IEO FAILURE to raise a tangible amount of funds.

I dont really agreeing with that. The success of a project is actually depending on the platform itself, how can I say that? Before the investors give support to a particular project they are checking first the platform of the project itself because I can say that it is their asset to be successful. They should have solid platform for them to gain a lot of investors, and also since we are using more of internet, their social media platform in terms of promoting, it should be broad because the wider social media platform they spread the goodness of the particular project the more investors will know about it.

I don't see any trends about these two projects and if they are good enough why they are having issues? Remember, all incoming projects are good and mostly, they are having a hard time because of their marketing strategies maybe lacking of it or THEY ARE NOT REALLY GOOD. That is my take on this.

Good projects on paper dont always cut it anymore for investors especially on Telegram. If you must raise a sizeable amount of money now from sales, you will need a good run of contact with vcs and investors in the blockchain sphere atleast with good working product and attractive bonuses, you can get initial funds for start up. EZ365 is an exchange and looks like it has a good team and foundation so might likely do well on the long run

Many only think about the money an ico raises but they do not realize that if an ico gets too much money then there is no one else to buy the coin and this means a very low volume, so many investors feel trapped in the coin since they cannot do anything else but to hold their coins and if one of the main holders get desperate then he will try to sell his holdings immediately crashing the value of that coin in the process, and for a new project this could a blow from which it never recovers.

If a project is able to attract many investors and achieve sales targets, the developer team will definitely choose a good exchanger, who has a large amount of liquidity and transactions. With the right selection of exchangers, tokens on the market will be more attractive because investors will be interested in the project

More and more new projects are working on exchanges and I think the developer team wants to take the opportunity amid the increasingly familiar cryptocurrency. Maybe there aren't many investors who want to invest at this time, but if a new project starts launching its products, I think there will be many investors who want to invest

It's true that good projects is having a hard time reaching it's softcap and hardcap because of investors losing their trust to invest again in projects due to scams and fraud. It is the reason why some projects releases a coin that don't have any good value in the market because they didn't make their project successful.

Indeed, investors had lost their trust to invest in an Ico project mostly got scam and lose money. Even it is a good project from the start it will ended up failed due to lack of strategy to get more investors. Like in bitwings I have heard this project they have an active team and lack of investors so it is best before we invest let us make research so our investment will not lose.

the above mentioned projects are very good projects and i am very baffled at the fact that they both couldn't attain softcap but then again, even better projects hardly attain softcaps in this space due to the fact that investors have not truly enjoyed the rewards from previous ICOs invested and this has really affected the upcoming projects.

It does not always work in that way. it's possible those projects to have a hard time but that was not happening with all of the projects especially when it comes to the trusted and reliable project. They never meet a hardtime when ran crowdsale in the past. The problem was investors are losing their trust and they were feeling worried about the existence of scammers in this ecosystem. Scammer just like cancer.

Good project Always good. every one wants to join and invest good project. Because every one don't wants to loss their capital.I think both project are good.

These two projects are good. I like both of these projects and look forward to it equally. I will join Bitwwins first and then I will participate in EZ365. and you ?

I really like the Bitwings project and I don't like EZ365. I will only participate in the Bitwings project

The initial fund needed to develop the project is Softcap. a fund is needed for the project to go further. Bitwings is a promising project, but I'm still not as confident as the EZ365 project.  ;D

The problem with EZ365 is that there are so many similiar projects like EZ365. Everyone wants to create crypto exchange / broker because it is probably the only one real use for ERC-20 tokens. Plus everyone wants to be at the beginning of something as big as Binance.

Hat method do you use to actually know that the project is good when they have not been tested, before I can classify a project as being good, until I see that they have been tested in a way that they will witness dump and still survive, it is when a project has witnessed dump and survive that I will know that the product that it has is really a working one, because everything you are basing it on right now is what they have on their whitepaper, and probably because the team looks good to you.

If it is based on that, we have too many good projects that are available other than this two, but the only way you can really know how string they are is when they have been listed on exchange and then you see how much people will continue to patronize them.

I will say this, at the moment the topic of IEO is already dying away and it is difficult for all projects to collect the minimum threshold for starting a project, since again on this battlefield there are many scammers who spoil the reputation of the industry. When someone comes up with something new in order to at least somehow diversify the holding of such a fundraiser, then the industry will take a new breath of air and possibly be reborn and projects will again begin to raise money. I also think that if for a long time a project cannot build Softcap, then you should not pay attention to such a project.

Developers are the one to get the job done, they have to find way to attract investors to invest in their projects, if the project have something rare to offer it will be easier to get investors

I am sorry to say that if I was a developer too, I might be tempted to actually do what most developers are doing now.

Imagine that u have had a plan in life to establish a business, and which is to be making e about $100k profit every year which is not a small profit for the next 50 years, which will be $5 million dollars as total profit, and then I come to the market to offer a project plan, which during the course of the campaign, I was able to raise $22 million dollars, is that not a profit for over a hundred years already, so tell me why I would stress myself again to start establishing the project, all I just need to do is create a project that investors will dump and then exit the market blaming the failure of the project on investors dumping. Is that not what most projects do?

I can say that our project's founders have invested into about a year of development before even starting our token sale. It is true that the crypto startup space isn't generating as much investment as in the past, but we believe market sentiment has a lot to do with that. Even if we don't hit our softcap target, our project will still be moving forward, however it may mean we won't be able to have as many developers staffed at once. EZ Exchange will be launching in January regardless and we are working on partnerships with strong projects to list. We believe that we are likely to see a lot more investment into the token sale once the actual exchange is released and people will actually be able to use our exchange and see exactly what sets it apart from all the other slew of exchanges out there. We extended our token sale so that there would be overlap in which the exchange is released before the token sale ends. There is a huge lack of trust in the space atm too with a lot of scam projects, but we are to be delivering on phase 1 of our project before the token sale ends, and we will be planning a lot more marketing efforts at that point.

We believe having a viable product in which user's can see the result of our last year and a half's efforts will help to build trust significantly in our project's long-term outlook.

Many projects face this issue because there is no trust like before in crypto as investors have lost trust and zeal to invest in IEO or ICO like before even the so call IEO and ICO isn't moving like before unless on a good exchange.

to reach softcap does require hard work and the team must try to make a contest so that more and more investors invest in it. Bitwings and EZ365 in my opinion is a good project, in addition to achieving softcap, support is also very necessary. I don't really follow the development of these two projects but I hope they can to succeed.

in the current conditions, it is indeed difficult to convince investors' trust. softcap is the minimum limit for a project to continue its work. with the achievement of softcap, it will increase the confidence of investors so as to achieve hardcap, therefore the hard work of the project team is needed

I agree with what you say, that there are many investors who are worried about starting to invest in a project because of the many scam projects lately so that maybe they would prefer not to invest and wait for the right time to start again, so I think here every New projects must be able to make an investor believe in the projects they bring so that they can attract many investors to invest in them.

There's an obvious reason for that - the ICO market is simply lacking hype that was surrounding it back in the days where funding was easy to obtain.

People are becoming more and more aware of the scams in ICOs, and as a result, even legitimate projects are under more and more scrutiny as the days go by. That's just the harsh fact of it all, there is really no way around it for investors and coin creators alike.

It's unlikely that we'll return anywhere near the hype experienced in the 2017 bull market. So expect lots of caps, soft and hard, to go unfulfilled.

Many projects have problems in raising funds at this time. The number of scam projects that took place some time ago affected a good new project but I think it's good if the developer team has been working on this project for more than a year and will continue to run even though sales targets have not been reached.
I think if on the way the developer team is able to present a good product, investors will be interested by themselves.

these projects have really good ideas and maybe they will be successful, but now I do not see interest in these projects among investors. they need to make more marketing to reach softcap

The HYPE during the last bull market was the driver of continuing price soar and the lack of HYPE will not give the same results in general. They need to achieve the higher potential marketing teams which can let the projects to take the maximum return on their marketing strategy. Investors are not stupid to underestimate the power of HYPE in the crypto markets and one of the reasons for the higher prices than average was the overestimated expectations by investors.

During that time most people are encourage and becoming a 'Fomo' because of the fact that the project's core team can manipulate their mind as you will see many people has 'Hype' during the last bull run. So, for now the project has become dull although they are legit, as we cannot blame investors as they don't have any protection from those project and no guartantee at all.

Thank you for your opinion, about the bitwings project i know, i' ve been in their bounty program before, their project has potential, they've reached softcap, their team works very well,
i appreciate it.

Bitwings, I saw this campaign before I took the examination this year. In fact, I want to invest and join at their bounties because it is a good for me. But I don't have time due to the daily reviews I had done. I thought this was already done but sadly to know that they are really in difficult to reach their softcap.

developer might prepare of work on scheme with the ico terms as occupying use with reference on work as deductive evaluation to turns of chance as might to gives on extensive as returning on exchange to deliver with nominal on limit as profit on expectation.
                         

If you can visit some ico list site just like icodrop and you will see a lot of good projects could not even reach its hardcap or softcap. Ico bench is not a legit site that can be trusted by anyone. Bitwings didn't even listed on the only reliable ico list site like icodrop. The problem that already argued by OP is real right now.

Checking on these two projects, they looked good but we cannot blame investors, because there are projects who are deemed good projects by even experts but end up a big failure I hope they will not do what LBX or London Block Exchange has done, pausing their campaign because they cannot reach the targetted funds, LBX distributed the token to bounty hunters and refunded investors, but what will Bounty hunters will do to useless tokens.

there might be better project than those, because as we know that every day new project will emerge, thus giving investors many options for investing in project and that makes only a few project that can be successful.

it's not just bitwing and EZ365 that are having trouble achieving softcap in this market, lots of projects are experiencing the same thing. Not achieving softcap will indeed make the project fail, but can provide additional time for softcap to be achieved. Good projects like bitwings and EZ365 have to work even harder to raise funds for their projects to run. But back to the interests of investors.

The Bitwing project exaggerates its smartphone as it advertises it can generate 2 EThs in a month. In addition, their IEO project on P2Pb2B, as far as I know, the IEO projects on this exchange were unsuccessful.

Fewer people are looking to invest in a project considering the fact that they all tend to dump upon listing. Investors look to make profits not record losses. This trend is the major reason why many projects are finding it difficult to raise money from investors as many are looking to buy after it is listed on an exchange at cheaper prices than the ICO/IEO.

We can say that there are more projects then people in crypto! With so many new projects and old projects people are not sure where to invest their money and to make some profit. After listing prices do drop, some of them hardly, one more big reason why people stay away from investing in early stages.
Looks like there are many reasons why some projects cant reach softcap, I would say that we need fresh blood, new projects should be ready for better marketing, to give more money for that, so they can attract more people, not just in crypto communities.

Title says hardcap however your message says softcap. Are you talking about softcap or hardcap? Hope both of these projects will sail through atleast on the softcap part.

Bitwings bounty campaign wasn't organized so well and I think that's one of the reasons they are finding it difficult to raise their softcap. So many rules which drove away many hunters so their project couldn't get enough audience