Bitcoin Forum

This is just if, new projects are finding it hard to list on top exchanges because of listing funds but since market is not in a good season why is top exchange listing fee still that high? Top exchanges are not making it easy for new projects to list on their exchanges or am i missing some good information?

And about binance IEO is there anyone on here who can tell me more about them? i mean if a project like eminer can conduct IEO on binance why can't others? is there some kind of agreement like taking IEO fundraising fee after IEO is successful?

Damn i wish new projects can just have their chances as well, now that bitcoin is losing its value things are getting more harder for new projects

The truth is that it cost a lot to list on big exchange. Many new projects may not be able to afford that. As for IEO that is been conducted on big exchange, there is a lot to that.

This is a market overflowing with crypto projects. Therefore, exchanges will always have clients and they can set any entry rules. It's like parking in the center of a metropolis - either pay or look for a place somewhere far away.

Large exchanges always require large fees to attach tokens to their exchanges, but for fees I don't think it will go down if the value of bitcoin is like this, but I still don't know whether the payment is in USD or can use crypto.
Eminers can use other exchanges as long as the funds are sufficient to pay for their tokens to be listed on large exchanges, such as the harmony of IEO's success in Binance but are able to add tokens to other exchanges because they are very sufficient.

The IEOs on the top exchanges have good returns, so there are certainly many projects eager to conduct IEO on those exchanges. The high competition will create big fees which is very normal.

First I would like to clarify Bitcoin will never lose it's values, it may be down now, but how many thousand times Bitcoin was down but always doubled it's price when moving up.
Listing fee will never change but I hope it does, because only good projects and with good potential can get in, I'm not saying all the other projects are not that good, but they need investors support, for them to get in the top market, more support more big market.
Bitcoin is the first decentralized coin all the others are centralized or pseudo decentralized, people adopting Cryptocurrency are more on adopting Bitcoin more than any coin because it represents the Cryptocurrency ecosystem.

There are a lot of terms and conditions for conducting IEO at a top exchange including fee and many conditions where basically the exchange becomes the complete controller and the project team seems to stay behind that is why not many projects like IEOs but it is a fact that IEOs at good exchange do help raise good funds.

It is not going to be possible to force those top exchanges to reduce their fees because the cryptocurrency market is not at its best time now, they have a reason why they charge high, and that is the same reason why it's only serious projects who are really ready to spend in order to promote their product that would get listed on those top exchanges.

And about the Binance IEO you talked about, do you think Binance would just allow any shitcoins to conduct IEO on their platform and ruin their reputation, no they wouldn't, all this measures are good to encourage this projects to work hard, they can't simply be having it so easy and scamming people in the process.

I think it depends on the potential level of the project. Binance only cooperates with projects with great potential so their reputation is not affected after listing. You know, Binance took a long time and lost a lot of money to build their reputation today and they always try to preserve it. In order to be an IEO on Binance, you must meet the requirements they have stated and besides, you must be a good founder and your project has the potential to agree to implement IEO.

A high listing fee on leading exchanges is the threshold that many teams of new projects cannot afford because now investment fees are  low. For an investor, IEO of project on Binance and other big exchanges is a guarantee of preserving their investments and profit in the future.

Its a sanction to the scam projects which most of them just get their tokens to the market and leave after dumping their own tokens. Now if they have to send considerably big amount of money just to get into the exchanges, these team might just have to work harder, release their product to prove them not a scam and maybe they get their listing fee and interest with the amount of tokens they hold which is probably more than 50% of the total supply.

In order to get into the IEO list on the Binance exchange, a startup needs to fulfill a number of conditions.One idea is not enough now.More information about how exchanges take the coins for the listing read in this article:
https://www.blockdelta.io/benefits-of-ieo-versus-ico-and-how-crypto-exchanges-choose-coins-for-listing/ (https://www.blockdelta.io/benefits-of-ieo-versus-ico-and-how-crypto-exchanges-choose-coins-for-listing/)

It's because the market that top exchange is guaranteed to give the best market for that coin. They wouldn't ask for a premium fee if they are a nobody exchange. You can easily distinguish the difference between the unknown exchanges versus the best ones.

Project developers have the choice to push that goal or just rely on those exchanges that aren't on the top.

Because it is not easy to be able to pass the verification of all their data to participate in register their project on Binance, such as a team that does not convince, unclear projects and lack of funds. I think not all projects can hold IEO on Binance because their rules are very strict to minimize losses to investors in order to stay comfortable while doing the IEO continuously.  So bad market now does not allow the project will easily do an IEO or listings on a good market exchange like Binance.

Binance does not launch IEO for every paid projects. As far as I understand, they thoroughly researches projects to protect their name, and provides the opportunity to share opinions to those who have complaint about project before IEO starts. If Binance had already given each project this opportunity, it would not have been as valuable. IMO, do not worry about the little things, Binance is a balloon that we all inflate together.

Why should it be easy for new projects to list on top exchanges? It's not a human right to get listed in Binance. And listing every scammy project would just devalue the whole exchange. I would prefer if there were less projects in them then now.

I think it is not only the cost to include IEO in binance but also requires proposals and other documents, new projects can open IEO binance, but if they meet the specified requirements because binance is not arbitrary in entering the project into its market.

What projects? Any serious project will be listed on many exchanges. As soon as they will build at least basic things. Coins that exist simply because someone decided so and have no meaning will not be listed on any exchange. Well they can be on some if pay nice fee. 

Grin is 1 year old. It had no premine. Or ICO or anything. Is simply opensource, so whoever want to develop helps develop. It is totally new protocol. IT is not a copy/paste project of some existing. So wallets, merchants, hardware wallets, exchanges need to develop special software if they want to use Grin.  But it is on this many exchanges: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/grin/markets/     How is that possible if no new project cant get on an exchange?

Top exchanges like Binance has the right to demand on what price they require before any tokens and coins get listed or conducting IEO's on their platform. Their standard is high compare to other exchanges because of its good liquidity and services. Top exchanges are always attractive to traders even if they just listed a new coin expect a high response.

Binance has a validator and verification team, a project can conduct an IEO on binance when there will be an agreement with the binance team and that ico has already passed all of the validation and verification. Not so many projects can do that because of binance will take the actual product as the main factor to listed ICO on its IEO platform. So many icos can't even create MVP and that's why binance has passed them all and take the one from them to conduct IEO on its own platform. About the agreement between binance and ICO platform that conduct IEO on binance platform can be argued consider about there is no information regarding what agreement that was already taken by both parties.

For listing to IEO Binance, there are several steps needed, not just the registration fee. Indeed, the registration fee to enter the Binance is quite expensive compared to other exchanges, but Binance also conducts research on new projects that wish to register at IEO Binance. This research is useful to find out about the project's readiness and what the project objectives are made, so that no project only speculates to enrich itself, but there are benefits for everyone.

There is one word that answers them all: standard. Top exchanges do not just admit any coins that are interested to be listed. If that will be allowed, top exchanges will quickly become shit exchanges because they will be inundated with shitcoins for sure. That is like opening the gates of hell. In the same way that Binance has also its own standard in accepting IEOs. If they don't have, their platform will also be inundated with shit projects launching IEOs. 

They have an event where ICO or IEO will be listed for free.
Maybe you could enter that if you want your token to be listed to them.

About the pricing though. This is good for me. An expensive price means a guarantee also that they will stay.
Imagine having just $1000 for listing and they end up getting what they need from buyers or ROI.
Say goodbye to them afterwards.

It has also come to my mind over the past few months that why listing exchange fees don't go down when bitcoin prices fall.
It is unfortunate for a new project that is really good in ideas, teams, and products that cannot enter the market. It has become clear that exchanges only require money, not good projects.
On the other hand, can the exchange be paid for with coins or new project tokens as collateral to be registered in the IEO of an exchange? This must be very easy for those developers who are serious and great.

IEO that are conducted on top exchange will surely end up with good result but fees are extremely high, but a good project can start from a mid level exchange and gradually list to better exchange, this can even make the coin have good value in future

I think it makes sense if the exchange charges a high cost to register a new IEO into their exchange because every IEO must meet good standards if the IEO has a small transaction volume, I don't think it will change anything about the IEO

The thing is that it is a completely free and open market. There is no regulation as to when an exchange HAS to list a particular project, which means that it is solely up to the exchange's discretion to decide when and why they want to list a token.

Usually, they want to get compensated in monetary terms, because obviously they cannot list every single token that they get requested to.

Also, it acts as kind of a filter which is not necessarily bad. Projects that can't even afford the fees are likely to go bust anyhow later down the line.

I think top exchanges has its own conditions for listing fee. No idea what currency a certain exchanges uses for the listing fee, it might be using bitcoin or usd. But it's really unfortunate for a decent project that cannot pay top exchange to list their alts. Even when the price of bitcoin falls down, the listing fee is still the same as expensive as before. There must a reason behind them. As for IEO, there must be a lot of things to put it mind for one project to conduct a IEO on binance or other exchange.

One just have to be careful which project they put their money on, this days new projects are just gaming every investors, many investors have no choice but to quit investing in new project and i don't blame them at all, lower fee won't change anything about IEO though and only very serious teams will list their token or coin on top exchanges

Binance don't want small projects to get in in their exchange, obviously, once they start accepting few many small projects  will try to get in there
so they have a high listing fee, they think that if the project is good enough, it will have a lot of support from the community, and investors will buy their token, so they will have a listing fee.
Binance is a profit-driven company, they are not more on technology.

Most of the new projects have lost their charm due to scam ones. Top exchanges have strict ruling for listing and it prevents the bigger chunk of users in terms of volume from scams. Low volume of trading is far better option than listing scams and things which are fishy. I really support their decisions in terms of not listing it.

Just look at smaller exchanges which list every thing by taking a small fee and what happens is the rest. Hope you have got your answer.

IEO's that being catered from reputable exchange like binance still have supporters who are willing to take the risk investing with the new project, investors still want to take chances as the outcome still bringing them good profits after the sale period was over. Taking the risk with the right team and right token gives investors decent earnings once the project start being traded inside the market.

Exchangers certainly do not want to lose and bear the risk of everything that happens in the market. whether the market is down or up, then the fee set is that much. when the market falls and some coins or tokens have no value, they will never even reduce the fee. if the value goes up, it is possible to increase the fee. exchangers here are as a place of exchange, and the place of exchange will not care about what is happening in the market today, as with shops, taxes will still be withdrawn so much, no matter the price of goods sold at the store goes up or not, crowded buyer or not.

It is not that they have lost their charm, it is because investors become more cautious and trying to avoid scam projects as much as they can.

I do agree, in small exchange, most of the projects will just end up decreasing their value and util they become shitcoins.

Would be great if all new developers thinks this way, many don't understand the outcome of listing on top exchanges, they are scared of the listing fee as if nothing good with come out of it

Honestly you are right bitcoin's price are getting worst so the result is bounty campaign are also getting worst everyday pass. It is hard now to find a good campaign or if find it,suddenly it's rules and payment system will change so it is hard to trust. I hope your wish will happen but I think it may affect the bitcoin's price.

The weakness of new projects causes them to lose value when not listed in the top exchange. I think the top exchange is not essential for a project. Instead, if devs update roadmap as required, other things will improve as time goes on. Today's top exchanges are useful in making profits in an easy way. If that is what you want for the project, go ahead.

As far as I know, the CEO of Binance only wants to collaborate with projects that according to themselves have a good reputation, not solely how much they have to pay for listing in the Binance market.
I think it's good to filter out any projects that might have a bad reputation.

If indeed the project deserves of course the market-class binance will consider it, just that we know 90% of the ICO/IEO now aims only to pump and dump most of them are garbage, so no wonder fee listings remain stable even though the market conditions are down, they try to keep their exchange good name.

I do not think that Binance has revealed how you can be a part of their IEO launchpad, but probably the answer is simple and it is money. The more you pay, the better is the chance of getting listed, because other IEO platforms are just garbage.

In order to consider a project a good and legit project, it should have money in order to support and raise a fund if it wants to be listed in an exchange. This is the reason why many projects can't list their tokens in an exchange is because of the fee they have to pay especially in Binance which is one of the largest trading platforms in cryptoworld. Tokens to be listed in this kind of exchange should be useful and valuable to cryptoworld and not just some scam tokens.

High listing costs will be a challenge for most projects. But it's worth mentioning that, despite the high cost, Binance currently has more than 100 projects listed. If the cost is reduced, there may be up to 200 or 300 projects listed on it. High listing costs are also a criterion to determine whether a project has sufficient cost for long-term project management. Look at those projects, they all work well.

Binance will never tell people how their selection procedures work because they have an incentive to front run their traders. It's one big circus where the real winner is Binance itself and the few who are lucky to be selected.

I have read through dozens of the probably thousands of complaints about Binance and their launchpad, and the complaints consistently point out that people can't enter in an IEO sale no matter how fast they are. It's reeks of shadiness.

it is feasible to register on binance requires large funds, because their services are already trusted. even so there are some projects that dare listing finance, to attract the confidence of investors. and finally they got a big sale, even though it wasn't a guarantee for the team to really work on the project

but basically it is difficult to be registered in Binance, they do an internal selection. plus projects that are unable to pass the registration stage. but if a project is able to develop slowly they will surely grow and one day it can be registered.

to be able to work with binance is very difficult and requires very large funds. There are a lot of requirements given by them. More details, you can visit their website.

It will not be hard if the project is really good and aiming to gather more investors and to raise enough funds. It will be hard in their part but after having those hardships, they will be able to make a good name for their project and if a certain project decided to enter in binance, they won't be having a lot of problems whatever it is if they are really a good project.

the problem of new project is they just can't stand out of each other, they are just look like the same from investors.
and at this time, listing on big exchanges is the money problem, even some shitty coin could make it if they have enough money to pay for exchange, I think.

Other IEO platforms are not all garbages, the problem with new projects developer is they failed to seek for answers, they follow their hearts and regret later on, gate .io and kucoin is not a garbage for IEO launcpad

The problem isnt always on exchange, but on the dev itself.
the dev often doesnt wanna list the tokens/ coins to top exchange bcz of some reason (mostly fee).

ofc the exchange doesnt allow all tokens/ coins to get listed on the exchange, it is because of trust issue
so exchange has its own agreement to get listed.

all projects have chance, depends on how dev makes progress

Why have to choose an IEO listed with top exchange listed for investing because we know by invest on great exchange market can increase transaction volume above billion dollar, how come if listed with shit exchange market, who want to invest and buy back after coin listed and active for trading, I think although price down we can keep trust there are many sell and buy order if listed with big exchange market.

You just stated facts and this have made many "potential" projects go backwards or struggle; we know good exchange contributes to the growth of any project. Now talking about IEO, I think there is more, maybe an agreement which will of course ensure the exchange receives a fat reward. On the case of listing, top exchanges doesn't care about your idea what they are after is their pay and if you can't afford check another exchange; this is actually why most projects gets started on smaller exchanges before moving up.

you just need to do a quality project and then listings on large exchanges will not be a problem. large exchanges very often can add good projects for free.

This is the hard truth of what's happening and might keep happening for a long time. Most of these exchanges are only after their own pockets thus the reason for high listing fees. The funny thing is, most projects will start small and once the gain momentum will list in those top exchanges. Talking about IEOs, it's a different ball game altogether because the exchanges has turned it to a pump and dump stuff thus investors follows suit, everyone now cares about immediate profit and nothing more which these top exchanges offers though.

Listing on big centralized exchanges has been a nightmare for new start-ups especially when they didn't raise sufficient funds during token sale. Assuming decentralized exchanges have required trading volume, popularity and good features suitable for traders at this point, the centralized exchanges posing very high fees before listing will adjust.  Also, about a project agreeing to give a particular percentage to the exchange for IEO is tenable, notwithstanding they still need to pay part of the listing fee based on agreement.

I agree with you when you say it involves money to be able to run an IEO on Binance since it's a big shot, however I don't agree with you when you term other IEO platforms garbage. My reason is because exchanges like OKEX, HUOBI, GATE.IO and KUCOIN still do well with IEO. In fact, I've made my highest IEO gains so far on Gate.io when I participated in SERO IEO and also made 3x on TOKO launched on KUCOIN even though I'm not holding any of those coins anymore.

Let's just say that they are selling their value to you. You know that your product is likely to meet the right audience on their platform and that's why you're looking for the opportunity to put it up there, and they too know that and that's why they are charging a high price for it. Building such a big platform and maintaining it is not easy, so they will always charge a lot of money for any organization that wants to place their product on their platform.

That's the reason why you should never rush into a project that you know you can't work to the end. You should always make sure that you have enough capital before diving into such a business. A major thing that kills most businesses is a lack of capital, so you should be sure you have enough and don't expect anyone to do it free of charge for you.

lack of money is not always the main problem. the problem is that th team doesn't know how to use this money correctly. I already participated in one project where the team raised about $ 5 million, but it simply did not fix the collected funds in a stable currency and then the project failed due to incorrect marketing. the most important thing is a smart team

Projects with low budget will definitely take into consideration many times if they are listing on Binance, or a global exchange of that class. With a good community, high trading volume, high web traffic, it will definitely easily attract the attention of investors, of course, it's equivalent to the fees charged.

 A lot of paperwork and agreements are reached before most projects are allowed to host their token sales on exchanges like binance. Most of them are in non-disclosure agreements so not much is known to the public on how these dealings are conducted

Binance is very serious and they don't trade what they have built for years for money. They choose very carefully to ensure long-term development projects and to protect investors' money. Binance is currently the most prestigious exchange in the world.

The owners of these large exchanges do not want to help develop new projects, they want to make money. You must understand this. Unfortunately this is how it works.

Crypto exchanges can not ignore the fact that listing projects that would turn out to be scams will harm their reputation too and this way they might end up losing trust of their customers. Binance also cant afford it. It has full right to look into the project that wants to make a contract. There must be many other factors that exchanges take into account. Let the CEO do his work because he knows his job far better than anyone of us.

for bination launchpad itself, I think it is easy, it's just that to register there requires a large amount of funds and I think all projects can actually go in there as long as they have funds, maybe an audit or something like that will be ignored if the funds they provide as fees for registering so much , btw this is just in my opinion maybe this could be wrong.

You may see it as being harsh or cruel on the part of the big exchanges to charge high fees for listing new projects especially those that conduct IEOs. It is important to understand that the exchanges also have their reputation to protect and not just quantity of coins to be listed. If things are made flexible on binance and co, some projects would just take advantage of the situation and create more mess.

It is not just a matter of cost to enter a large exchange, a large exchange also has a project requirement that can enter a large exchange, because if a large exchange does not have a project requirement to enter a large exchange if there is a problem in the project, the large exchange will affected by this problematic project can make the reputation of a large exchange down

Putting ridiculous listing fee doesn't necessarily increase reputation of exchanges, they can do thorough research as usual  before agreeing to list even with fair listing fees. Decentralized exchanges like IDEX which claim to list for free usually do proper research and follow up on it, hence if there are deviations from listing terms, they immediately delist the token without prior notice. I think these big exchanges ain't helping matters when it comes to listing fees, I'm not saying it should be very low so that any "Tom or Jerry" can list, I'm just in the opinion that the fee should be avergage to help and encourage good startups.

I also hope that there are so many projects that do sales in popular markets. Well, if not this year, I hope it will happen next year. but, as far as I know, to do a list or IEO on a popular market has several conditions, and these conditions are quite difficult to accept. like binance, it looks like binance only accepts projects that truly provide benefits, and also high potential. This is not just a matter of payment for the list, but also the quality of the project.

Although it seems as a valid argument, it doesn't work that way.  You're basically asking institutions to lower their standards so as to accommodate projects that can't level up.  I believe as an exchange,  having a standard is very important, regardless of market conditions.  Yet again,  we're dealing with 'if'.

I don't think it is nessasery for projects to be on "top exchanges" they can go on quieter ones. If they are good they will survive and be just fine. Where you sell the tokens doesn't determine the quality of the project in any way. Don't be fooled into thinking these exchanges only host good coins and tokens.


What has price got to do with standard though?

We are all hoping that the market will go well again just like what happened last two years ago, reaching every cryptocurrency to its highest peak in terms of value and making everyone literally making profit because at that time almost all of projects that are being produced is going successful because at that time since the price of every cryptocurrency is on a high value there are actually lots of investors investing their money to a project to support. As a bounty hunter at that time, I can say that I can make a profit doing my tasks by promoting a particular project by wearing their signature. I hope that it can happen again.

I don't think you are making sense with this post. What brought us to this state we are, that people are not willing to invest into tokens again is the high velocity of ICOs in 2017. What you are suggesting is that exchange should just allow any project to list on their platform. If that is what you want you can go to Binance DEX and raise money through IDO, lets see if people would invest in your project

The more projects that being made the more the demand for those projects to get listed on big exchanges. Of course, if you have a good reputation and a bigger name where would be the people to buy those projects? That's why exchanges nowadays are making their demand for these overflowing projects that wanted to get listed on their reputable exchange. It is all about the money and exchanges are taking advantage of it.

Capitalists have taken over crypto space and they don't care much about projects with team that has no money. The listing fee on top exchanges is huge and only few projects can afford to pay it. There is a need for support for new projects but the already established platforms careless about new ones

It is conductive for them to be selected on projects that can be listed on their exchange and also a high fees to list on there. They also restrict it to ieo for example in binance is usually you'll need to completed kyc and you hold bnb to participate in the ieo not sure but that's what i know

Of course, they won’t. obviously this is a very bad idea so that projects can be placed on any exchange. Each project must be something in order to get on a large exchange. A project has to deserve a listing on a good exchange

The more famous exchange we are talking about the more fees you should pay. Binance fees are astronomical I think :)
If we are talking about IEOs I think there is a BTC fee and a % from the collected funds.

It is not completely necessary to list your tokens on one of those well known exchanges. They are known for charging crazy fees anyway. I think if a project starts on a smaller or lesser-known exchange it is ok.
They can build up their own rep and the exchanges rep together. I don't believe just because an exchange is big that we must just trust them.

When you say new projects, do you mean projects that has real uses or some useless project that has nothing to offer? If a project is out for business,  it should have hackers and angel investors to to make it easy for them to be on top exchanges

They are the top exchanges, they only want the best one and big projects that are supported by big exchanges in the market, they believe if the project is a good one many investors will invest in it during the crowdfunding, and they will have a fund allocated for it.

Large exchangers do impose large listing fees because they have advantages in large transaction volumes. With a large listing fee, this will minimize new projects coming in and only established projects can register. But some large exchangers sometimes impose free listing fees if the coins or tokens have good prospects and a large community

If a large exchanger frees the listing fee, what happens is that all projects can be listed but the drawback is that the exchanger cannot detect the project as legit or not. In addition, exchangers need large funds to continue to improve their security and I think one of the listing fees is used to finance increased security

yes i agree with you an exchange like a parking lot. the more strategic the parking lot, the more expensive the fee will be. as well as exchanges. if you want the token that we make easy to recognize and also easy to get investors then we have to register it in a good exchange and have many users. of course the cost required is quite large. but if you don't have enough capital then the token can be registered at an unknown exchange and have few users.

Well funded projects won't have problem listing on top exchanges but most new projects of nowadays rely entirely on funds raised from ICO or IEO and if target is not met they quit, its developers call to make, if they want the best awareness and adoption for their project they will list on better exchanges

This is a challenge for new projects to attract many investors to buy their coin so they can list on those top exchange, ofcourse it's not easy for new projects to have high amount of fundraising in this current market condition, and the other way for new project to get list is from IEO, i heard IEO on top exchanges are not required to pay but they reviewed the project based on the quality of the project itself

There are certain criteria each exchange pans out for projects. For a project to meet being listed on the exchange, such project must fulfill such criteria. Binance lists some top tokens they think meets with their standard without the project paying any listing fee. It's not about high cost of listing fee it's about project quality.

Right now even Binance IEOs are not doing great and if I am not mistaking the last IEO did not even reach the token sale price after listing. It is getting almost impossible to find a profitable project nowadays, even IEOs are letting down.

I do not agree with you, with the costs that have been collected the best initial capital to enter the market is to be listed on a large exchange to show the public the seriousness of the project.
Current market conditions if you want a new project to be something that must be taken into account must have it.

Agree with you, now all IEO really becoming successful now compare to the ICO before during its first year, but now, people/investors becomes too conservative now when it comes to investing in a certain project, they have noticed and checked already what's the common practice in the market, and we cannot blame them, why would they invest if they can buy at dip after exchange, right.

Right, at the moment it's very rare for good projects that we really can follow, especially since there have been so many IEO projects that have failed to reach the minimum sales, and when they have been listed on the exchange always experience very sharp price drops, tokens like wasted so alone in exchange.

not all team behind the new IEO can afford the listing fee of large exchange like binance
even they can afford it there still a lot requirement needed for the team to submit

I think everyone is out for their own interest;
The exchange platform have to keep paying staffs and maintain profit margin
While new projects are also out for their profits first before project development

Except in rare occurrences where we have determined projects

It's really hard to be listed on top exchanges. I think more than 5 BTC will be a payment just to list on binance, kucoin, and bittrex.
They do that so that, scam projects will be filtered. Therefore, almost all altcoins found there are good and profitable.
So many projects that wanted to be part of binance but only few goes in, those who are determine to market their own token. Besides, there is a promo of free listing.

Binance IEO NEVER failed to reach minimum sales, and the last IEO, which is KAVA coin, increases more than 2x from listing price
so, Binance IEO is good investment in this time. most of them is successfull
trying to read any information carefully, and always check so you dont get fooled

In my opinion, indeed every big market can only accept projects that really have a good future, and brands are more selective. In this case I am not saying that your project is bad. But market people surely they also don't want to be harmed. Indeed, not all of the projects can implement IEO in the already popular market such as binance. There are many reasons such as high fees, project developers must be willing to pay dearly so that the project can be accepted in binance. This is a matter of reputation and security. Whether it's bribing or not or someone inside works, I think it's a secret. So from that now a new exchanger is emerging, which includes IEO support, I think this is the effect of the above problem. With the difficulty of the acceptable IEO project, it may be that people think why not create their own exchanger that supports IEO and organizes it.

Let's take it to the fundamentals... Why would you want the project you're supporting to be listed on a top exchange like Binance when it is just starting out? - It's easy and cost effective to list on decentralized exchanges nowadays and almost anyone with an internet connection can trade there. Listing on a big exchange with big volume makes sense when the project is mature and the token economy needs more liquidity, but until then I don't see any reason for that. If the token has a working model it will thrive in any kind of trading environment. It is just a matter of supply and demand.

Each exchange has certain benchmarks or standards on volume and costs. that is why it is not easy to register on the top exchange, because this also affects the reputation of an exchange. The top exchanges definitely choose projects that are serious and have a lot of interest, if not the impact is a small volume and be shitcoin, of course the exchange does not like if this happens.

For the IEO problem in my opinion before it runs, there must be an agreement first. because it uses marketing strategies and forms of promotion involving a crypto exchange. so events like crowdfunding run more quickly and depend on the launcher of the IEO crypto exchange.

It's hard and it's expensive that's why I agree with you, the project can be listed first with decentralized exchange and allow the process of maturity, then when there are many supporters the team can think about listing it with big exchange as expected investors and traders will allow the coin to have better trading volumes and reach a good value when the project continue to succeed.

That is legit. Exchanges specially that have millions of users need to make sure that the projects they list on their platform are not scam or frauds. Because if in any way, they turned out to be lies, it will highly damage the reputation of an exchange. 5 bitcoin is a fair amount as scammers can never pay this much. But the serious projects can afford the charges. Binance is a renowned name certainly.

maybe if what you say actually happens then the potential for coins will also increase but unfortunately the obstacles that exist make it difficult for coins to be listed on large exchanges. and most investors certainly do not want to wait long, they are more expecting a good exchange list and quick profits. these constraints usually can occur apart from the quality of the token

Top exchanges still remains top and quality, they set their standards high and i think its for the best. Projects that can afford an IEO in any top exchange will gain a good exposure and awareness.

There are all kind of projects and exchanges, big and small in size and scope. There is a place for all. Big exchanges provide higher trading volume and liquidity over small ones. That is one reason they do not want the overhead of tiny projects with little trading volume.

This is one of the few reason why some new projects didn't have the chance to went out to the market, it was mostly because of the fee. On the other hand, we cannot really expect all of the new projects to be listed on top exchanges cause it would surely mess up the system. Not all new projects deserve to be listed, only those that were able to meet sll the requirements needed and I think that is one of the reason too why listing fee is still very high, to filter new projects at its best.

The market situation does not affect the exchanges and therefore they hold the same listing price. All projects have chances, the main thing that they enjoyed success.

The fee for listings on the best platforms is high, but it is not overwhelming for a project with the idea of solving modern problems.
This is the fee you need to pay to enter the current, rather dubious, market. If you are not ready, wait for a better time.

While it is true the fee can be very high for new projects I really think this is not only about the money, exchanges charge that fee to get listed because it is a way to filter many coins without having to do any research in them, but you are mistaken if you think this is the only way for a coin to get added to an exchange.

Many exchanges perform a poll regularly and they ask their customers which coin they will like to be added to their exchange and if a coin with a good development team but without too much money wins then their coin will be added to the exchange, this lead us to an obvious conclusion if the developers of a coin want to make sure their coin gets added to many exchanges then they need to make a good project.

I think more projects should look to make a mixed ICO/IEO. And that they do not do IEO exclusives. Instead, list IEO in as many exchanges as they can that way they can gather big volume and make sure they will have lots of exchanges to begin with.

Large volume exchangers actually dont care on what is the market situations its business and they can imposed fees they want to gain more profit like for example Binance is a very huge exchange and has a very huge listing fees but they also have some promotional offers like voting to be listed for free who wins the highest vote on the other hand about some projects listed on Binance IEO not all have the opportunity to list because they research first and they approve each project.   

Now IEO is already unpopular like its predecessor ICO and such. Somehow now investors are not interested and hope to a new project where most of the dead and useless. Bitcoin also dropped to make investors more not to glance crypto for now possible? Or they hold stable coin because now the market is still bad.

One of the reasons why listing on top exchange is not easily accessible to every project is because of the listing fee. It would be funny to ask the top exchange to reduce the cost of listing when the listing fee is a major source of income for running the exchange. The exchange won't be enviable if the necessary modalities are not in place and these modalities needs fund to maintain.

Part of their strategy is to hold stable coin or pairs with stable coins and take some advantage with small margin trades. It's hard to predict the future from this industry even old coins who once being successful are not performing so with bitcoin where the value still down from the last time high. You have to assess every decision that you will take make sure that you are done with all the necessary preparations before taking any actions.

It is not unpopular, but there are no projects that can attract the attention of investors. I'm pretty sure when there are IEO projects that sell on popular markets such as binance, huobi, and other popular markets, I think the project will reach the hardcap faster. in addition, IEO projects like that currently rarely appear. however, what you mean by IEO is that IEO sells in a market that is not very good, therefore sales are quite slow.
whether it's holding back developers from making sales on popular markets, whether it's project quality or fee fees for listing there. but I'm quite confused, why don't they ask to list in popular places if they really want to develop their project.

All listing have a requirements, those who successfully launched their IEO in Binance have successfully passed all the requirements that Binance has set on. And with regards to listing fee, the more popular the exchange is the higher their fee is. That is how the exchange works and if you are worried about the new projects that cannot afford the listing fee, then you should stop it as most of the projects that cannot afford that listing fee is just a shit projects.

Genuine projects are not that week to unable to collect the listing fee to any exchange that they like to list their tokens/coins.

Conducting IEO on binance is indeed very expensive and every project who were able to conduct their token sale in binance must have a very buoyant promoter. Despite the fact that most IEO in the industry have been going through a high failure rate, IEO carried out in binance have been much better, this shows that there's something extra enjoyed by binance projects

Now I am trying to differentiate self funded projects with IEO or ICO projects, my advice for developers is not to rely on funds if they have none to at least get the project going, its not a must to release new projects

naturally if a new project is difficult to list on top exchanges. Top exchanges certainly will not be arbitrary to list new projects in their exchanges. Just imagine, if the shit token list on the top exchange, it could be that over time, the exchange will become a shit exchange also because of loss of volume and trust

There is what we called QC I dont think shit token can easily penetrate good exchange such as Binance, Kucoin, and other big volume markets. They also scrutinizing some projects based on their aspect and it will only make them down if they list a project without any potential at all. Latoken, P2pb2b these exchange lack of fundamentals when it comes to listing and dont think the investors money as long as they can earned from payment listing.

a good project will have no trouble regarding registration fees on the exchange. even Binance has a voting path for the best projects to enter into binance. Binance always selects the best projects for listing in their markets. high cost, I think is to maintain price stability when it comes. and as a guarantee that the project is truly competent. other than that, about IEO. I think it's about obeying the rules. about the clarity of the project. and the agreed fee. guarantee against investors. like CUBIEX. I have followed that. when listing on the dex binance market. prices are falling, but the cubiex project has a BuyBack policy. so that investors remain guaranteed for their funds.

therefore Binance, Okex or Huobi very rarely do IEO like other exchanges do,
you can see P2pb2b and exmarkets there are a lot of IEO going on and the results are losing

It is right, of course that exchanges need good reputation too that given by users to them. I think it is good for us too, so we can really see if the project is really worth to trade in that exchange. But lose of profit will always depends on our hand.

haha, you should be aware that non-potential projects will usually not be listed on large exchanges and you should know the rule of thumb in the marketplace, that there is never any free help here!
If Binance is pitiful for bad projects and always lists them to increase liquidity, then where will the honor and reputation that Binance has built up over the years go? You should only blame the project that you join is not potential and bad projects must be eliminated early, done.

That's true, if the project is really promising, they will climb their way up and in that way, it will be easy for them to enter big exchange and listing fee won't matter to them.
There will be no free service nowadays and big exchanges is keeping their exchange as a shitcoin free because of this listing fee. If somehow Binance will lower their standard, their hardwork over the years will be put to waste.

Binance built a very good reputation and even compensated hacking customers and I think it is reasonable if Binance wants to maintain that good reputation by only listing projects that are promising for the development of the cryptocurrency market.

Do not worry, time for IEOs and ICOs will come again, but we need to have positive market. Look how investors behave in bull market and how in bear market. In bear market people stop believing in strong coins like BTC or ETH, so you want them to buy risky coins?

that is the reason why new projects are not so ambitious to enter quickly on a top exchange because there are indeed such concerns. okay, maybe that's the wrong reason but in reality most new projects always use exchanges with low entry costs. whereas on the other hand they can still enter the top exchange with high entry fees, because basically they have enough costs for it and also the initial struggle will definitely produce good results too when listed on the top exchange at least investors will more attention about it

All will have it's time, I do invest in top alts only now unlike before that I experiment in investing in different coins even in new ones, it's just that those existing coins were already struggling, how about those new ones that is just experiencing the market volatility it might be a double harder for them to survive.

Maybe the reason why big or well-known exchanges keep their listing fee that high despite of Bitcoin's devaluation in the market is to secure that only top performing projects can be able to afford being listed meaning, for a new project to be able to afford getting listed into such exchanges, they must have a successful output on sales from bounty hunters and investors most specially because getting into a big and well-known exchanges somehow means that the project have already established a good credibility through publicity and popularity demands to wish being listed into the top exchanges in the industry. All of the projects are capable to be listed on those exchanges but they must be able to establish first a good credibility to be able to have good sales in order to afford getting the needed funds to be listed on big exchanges.

Binance have the right to have a listing requirement for any projects, remember if listing is that easy many shitcoins will be on binance right now, any new project that wants to get on binance should be very well prepared

I believe exchanges has parameter about this one, must complete and reach high level than accepted. Exchanges has system to protect and give customer the best services, make coins listing but not profitable will give negative impact into exchanges reputation. Listing in exchanges in good step to create market more bigger for project but if can't project can built their own exchanges in their web site, everything has solutions.

Market conditions will always have an impact on investor attitudes, because they will always be careful in bearish market conditions but are more conducive when the market is bull. market conditions can indeed be an initial race for people to invest, and no one will dare to invest if they get a loss

Binance is very positive about it, they always carry the good name of Binance, the IEO held at Binance is all going well and there is no scam, so it will be very good if one day Binance announces a new IEO we must follow it

more with choice on selection as developer to release of token to put on exchange within the terms of ipo and gains on returns as supporting of plan on extensive as preparing completion of project with goods on product and service to offers of consumer.

If exchange listing has become that easy and that cheap, we will have tons of new projects launching because they can get listed in a big exchange right away, listing in big exchanges is like advertising, coins will have a good exposure to traders and investors, and of course, they have a very strict screening,  this is the reason why only good coin can enter big exchange.

Listing fees are quite high on top exchanges they are still charging hefty fees because I feel they can not lower their standards of listing criteria and there are some terms and conditions to follow to conduct IEOs. As we all know in this bearish market it's hard for any project to collect huge funds that's why it's not easy for them to list their coins on top exchanges due to high fees and I would like to say bitcoin is still strong and it is not losing its value its only a matter of time. 

Exchanging listing fees are so high that investors are afraid to exchange things. I think the exchange fee is because the currencies are trying to make more money and need a stable maintenance fee.

I wish you were the same. All projects like bitcoin or other projects should also have their own opportunities, with the current situation not as good.  :(

Now the new projects are having a lot of difficulties listing, leading exchanges rely on the listed funds but because the market is not in good season. I wish everything was better, the projects were less difficult, especially the projects that I was investing in.

Being able to list on Binance is one of the benchmarks of success and quality of a project at this time, because Binance is one of the global exchanges with quite large and popular volumes. With such a good reputation, projects can not be arbitrarily joined, the costs are also expensive, and the Binance team certainly has specific standards for ideal project criteria. So projects with low quality, low budget, low interest, will definitely be difficult to join Binance.

If the list of coins becomes easy in large exchanges, there will be many coins becoming shitcoin because many of the projects now develop only but after a long time they die, the project and the tokens die in the market, so the coins are worthless anymore, now that's a big exchange. very selective in choosing coins and really tight especially with expensive listing fees several times that of its regular exchange.

I have know a bit of information about binance IEO. If a project like an eminer is able to conduct an IEO on binance then others cannot for many reasons and especially the eminer was born for binance.

Listing fees are the killer but if the team behind new projects are willing to gamble with their creations and they trust that they can provide good services, it will not be an issue for them to pay for it using their own money and allow time to judges the success if there's real usages from the project that they've offered. Investors are keen to find good coins that have real value inside the industry they are going to research and investigate.

I don't know what the requirements are for your project to be selected, but for IEO selection by major exchanges you need to pay huge sums of money. And also your project must have celebrities and large investment funds invested, And your project must be clear, have working products ....

The point is not just any project that can be listed on the top exchanges in the market and every company always has its own procedures. so, actually this is logical, about projects that are difficult to be listed on large exchanges because of financial problems.
on the one hand, every company also does not want its reputation tainted, just because it includes unclear projects in it.

for me the most important is a project that has a product that works well for the community, because when the product works and works well people will use it and I think the price will follow it too

I really agree with what you say, because a project that has a product that is needed by the community will certainly continue to grow in line with public demand for the product, with an innovative product of course a project will not have difficulty in attracting investors to want to invest in a project, and this is where the developer's accuracy is needed in choosing an appropriate project concept to be applied in the project.

I believe that large exchanges like Binance consider themselves the best and do not see competitors. All this gives them the opportunity to keep the price of leasing, especially since such exchanges have large volumes, which attracts a large number of traders. However, they still give the opportunity to the best projects to get the opportunity of listing through voting. I have an opinion that such large exchanges already have a monopoly and can themselves set the conditions for the market and the community.

In my opinion, some large exchangers sometimes free up listing fees if the project is good. Binance has freed listing fees several times for several coins for several reasons and one of them is because of its large community.

This was to be expected, despite the huge amount of money that is moving in this market investors do not have an unlimited amount of money to invest in the markets, they need to obtain profits and if they do not then any investment vehicle is going to lose its popularity really fast.

And that is what it is happening to ieos supposedly they will fix all the problems of icos and all the scams that took place with that form of investing and after some time investors have realized that nothing has really changed and they keep losing as much money as before so they do not have any reason to keep believing in ieos.

Exchanges are private run businesses with the first of goal to make profit and charging listing fee is one way for them to make profit. If they open their doors cheaply, we will see an influx of shitcoins in exchanges so to wade of most of them their fees has to be high.